Outstanding (demonstrates excellent creativity and originality)
Above Average (portrays good level of creativity and originality) Average (indicates some level of expectations) Marginal (below standards and expectations) Unacceptable (Project is out of scope and formatting does not adhere to standard)
Criteria Rating Rating Scale
Introduction (the introduction section clearly states the project purpose, significance, motivation, and problem statement). 10 Related Work (The project have considered and revised quality 10 and up-to-date related literatures). Method/Techniques (The project has utilized appropriate 10 technique(s) in analyzing the process). Results/Analysis (The results of the project are concise and well 10 explanatory). Conclusion (The findings are clearly stated, consistent with the 10 results, and mentions future research idea). References and citation (The reference are well in line with the project; the number of references is enough to justify the outcome; the references are up-to-date; the references were 10 properly cited in the manuscript and the citation format adhere to the approved style). Project formatting, Language, and Structure (The project has adhered to the standard and approved template; the language is 10 properly formatted to a very good readable level). Quality of presentation slides 10 Attendance and Live Clarity of presentation 10 Presentation Ability to answer questions 10