Project Work Phase I Review and Evaluation Guidelines.

o Project work Phase I review and evaluation shall be done twice during 7th
semester term days.
o 1st review shall be scheduled during 3rd /4th week of November, and the 2nd
review shall be scheduled during the 3rd /4th week of December 2022.
o The review committee shall be constituted by Project coordinator in
consultation with HOD.
o The project review committee for each of the batch shall consist of One Senior
faculty member/ project coordinator, guide and two faculty members
specialized in the Project work domain. The same committee shall evaluate
review for project phase 1.
o The Head of the Department shall monitor the review at their convenience.
o The Project work coordinator shall announce the schedule for evaluation well
in advance to the students and staff.
o The rubrics for evaluation should be bought to the notice of the students and
familiarize the content of the rubrics to all the students well in advance.
o The review and evaluation shall be through PPT presentation/demonstration.
o Students are not allowed for presentation without prior approval of the
respective guide.
 Phase -1 [Review -1, Total Marks: 30]
Rubrics for Project Review and Evaluation, 2022-23.
Good Moderate Average Remarks
Parameters
[Marks] 5 2-4 1
Problem Social / Social
Identification New Commercial /Commercial
Product/idea relevance. relevance.
[5M]
Research Environmental.
outcome Agricultural.

8-10 4-7 1-3

Introduction Detailed Moderate Brief
[10M] explanation. explanation. explanation.
Background Background Background
Societal Objectives /Objectives
Relevance
Objectives
8-10 4-7 1-3
Literature Literature Literature Literature
Survey review with review with review with
good moderate average
[10M]
substantiation of substantiation of substantiation of
the project title the project title the project title
and references and references and references
minimum of 6 minimum of 4 papers less than
papers from papers from 4 from reputed
reputed journals reputed journals journals

Presentation and 5 2-4 1

Q & A [5M] Good Moderate Average
Presentation presentation presentation.
with answering with answering
all questions few questions
Review 2: 70 Marks
1. Introduction: 5
2. Literature Survey: 10
3. Methodology: 15
4. Q&A/discussion: 5
5. Outcomes: 5
6. Report: 20
7. Attendance: 10
 Phase -1 [Review -2, Total Marks: 70]
EXCELLENT GOOD AVERAGE Remarks
Parameters 5 3-4 1-2
[Marks]
Introduction [5M] Detailed Moderate Brief explanation.
explanation. explanation.
Background Background Background
Societal Relevance Objectives /Objectives
Objectives

9-10 6-8 1-5

Literature Survey Literature review Literature review Literature review
[10M] with good summary with moderate with average
and substantiation summary and summary and
of the project title substantiation of the substantiation of the
and references project title and project title and
minimum of 10 references minimum references papers
papers from reputed of 8 papers from less than 7 from
journals. reputed journals reputed journals
12-15 6-11 1-5
Methodology/Tech Detailed Moderate Brief explanation of
niques [15M] explanation of the explanation of the the methodology to
methodology to be methodology to be be adopted to
adopted to achieve adopted to achieve achieve the
the objectives with the objectives with objectives with
relevant block relevant block relevant block
diagrams or flow diagrams or flow diagrams or flow
charts. charts charts
The process The process The process
incorporated is in- incorporated is in- adopted is in-
line with objectives. line with few sufficient to meet
Partial demo / objectives. the objectives.
results.

4-5 2-3 1
Q&A/discussion Good Presentation Moderate Average
[5M] with answering all presentation with presentation.
questions answering few
questions
5 3-4 1-2
Outcome Innovative products Product / new Objectives not
[5 ] / Funding Potential / technology. clearly substantiated
16-20 8-15 Less than 8
Report Evaluation Excellent Good Average
(By Guide)
[20]
9-10 6-8 1-5
Attendance [10] 81-100% 60-80% 50-60%