You are on page 1of 19

ASSIGNMENT

HMEE5013
EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION
MAY 2022 SEMESTER
___________________________________________________________________________

SPECIFIC INSTRUCTION

1. Answer in English or Malay.

2. Number of words: 3000 – 5000 words excluding references.

3. Submit your assignment ONCE only in MULTIPLE files.

1
4. Submit your assignment ONLINE.

5. Submission date : 19 JULY 2022.

6. This assignment accounts for 60% of the total marks for the course.

2
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this assignment is to enable students to demonstrate their ability to write a
research proposal in the area of education administration. The students will be exposed to
the issues of educational administration better through self-reading and discovery.

TASK REQUIREMENT
This assignment is divided into two parts. In part 1, you are required to write a research
proposal related to any professional situation or event related to the area of educational
administration. In part 2, you need to prepare creative PowerPoint slides based on the
assignment in Part 1. The details of the content expected and allocation of marks for the
assignment are explained in the accompanying Content and Scoring Rubric.

Part I
QUESTION 1 (40%)
You are required to write a research proposal about your interest in the area of educational
administration. The proposed research title should be related to the topics we have covered
in this course. For example, you might want to explore the implementation of a program in
your school by looking at it in terms of some of the change literature, or describe what is
happening in a particular situation by referring to leadership literature. You will be writing

3
an academic proposal by referring to course readings or any support materials you believe
would be appropriate. This paper should consist of the following aspects:

1. Introduction – (i) background of study, (ii) problem statement, (iii) research objectives,
(iv) research questions, (v) significant of study.

2. Literature Review – analyze any 3 (THREE) past studies (the latest ten years) related to
your topic/research.  You need to highlight the problem statement, research objectives
or questions, research method (such as research design, respondents, etc.), findings,
and conclusion.
3. Research Methodology – research design, population and sample (for quantitative),
information about respondents (quantitative) / key informants (qualitative), research
instrument, data collection procedure, data analysis procedure.

(Note: use the future tense in this section because it is what you plan to do)

4. References - references should be between 7 and 10 journals/articles/books and follow


the APA style (7 edition)  

4
[Total: 40 marks]

QUESTION 2 (10%)

Based on the above assignment in Part 1, prepare creative PowerPoint slides. Your
Powerpoint slides need to be uploaded separately from your Part 1 assignment in the
myINSPIRE submission system. Your PowerPoint slides mark will be based on the given
assessment rubric. 

Number of slides: 8 to 10 slides

[Total: 10 marks]

Part II
ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION (10%)

5
This part requires students to participate actively in the MyINSPIRE eforum. Discuss the
following topics in the forum and submit proof of your participation with your tutor and
peers in the eforum online discussions:

Online discussion question:


(a) Are teachers considered professionals in the teaching profession? Explain with relevant
examples.
(b) Why do teachers need to participate in decision-making in schools?

Drucker, P (2017). Human


Prosperity in a Changing
World. Peter Drucker
challenge 2017. The future
economic man. P
INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO SUBMIT PROOF OF ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION (10%)
Do the following:
1. Select the best FIVE (5) postings from the forum discussion set up by your tutor.
2. Do screenshots of the postings and include them as images in your assignment.
3. The screenshots should be in the image file (either in JPG or PNG format) . Refer to the sample of Screen
Grab below
4. The screenshots should contain: Name, Title of the discussion, Day, Date and Time.

6
Guidelines for Submission:
a. Use double space and 12-point Times New Roman font.
b. Provide reference using the American Psychological Association (APA) format 7 th
edition.
c. References should be the latest (the year 2010 onwards)
Notes:
● Assignments should be submitted according to the due date.
● You are to submit a softcopy of your assignment online through myINSPIRE.
● Plagiarism is not acceptable. If you are unsure what plagiarism means, refer to the
various websites that discuss this matter, e.g. owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts.

7
[Total: 10 marks]

[TOTAL: 60 MARKS]

Drucker, P (2017). Human


Prosperity in a Changing
World. Peter Drucker
challenge 2017. The future
economic man. PDC 2017.
Drucker, P (2017). Human
Prosperity in a Changing
World. Peter Drucker
challenge 2017. The future
economic man. PDC 2017.

8
Drucker, P (2017). Human
Prosperity in a Changing
World. Peter Drucker
challenge 2017. The future
economic man. PDC 2017
Drucker, P (2017). Human
Prosperity in a Changing
World. Peter Drucker
challenge 2017. The fut

9
ATTACHMENT
ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS
HMEE5013 EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION / MAY 2022
PART 1: QUESTION 1 (40 MARKS)

Unsatisfactory
Excellent Good Fair Poor Or
No response

Max
*QN CLO
Criteria Weight Marks

4 3 2 1 0

10
1 1 Title The title is excellent The title is good and it The title is not so The title is not very No title provided
0.5 and it reflects the reflects the approach clear, it does not clear, it does not 2
approach used and used and the study can reflect the approach reflect the approach
the study is doable. be considered. used. Not suitable to used.
proceed.

1 1 Introduction The introduction The introduction The introduction The introduction is There is no
2.0 describes all describes some describes only certain poor. Lack of introduction at 8
components components of the parts of the coherence. The all.
(background of study, background, research background explanation is
research objectives, objectives, research components of the confusing.
research questions questions and study, research
and significance of significance of the objectives, research
study) and the report study. The report is questions and
is well written. good. significance of the
study. The
explanation is
insufficient.

11
1 3 Literature Review - A detailed analysis is A detailed analysis is A partial or brief A very brief analysis No analysis was
Analysis of the THREE 3.75 provided of the five provided of the five analysis is provided was provided but only provided. 15
journals/articles elements. The elements. of the five elements. on one or two of the
Highlighting (i) problem analysis is above five elements.
statement, (ii) research expectation.
objectives or research
questions, (iii) research
method (such as research
design, respondents etc.),
(iv) findings, and (v)
conclusion.

1 4 Research Methodology A detailed A detailed explanation A brief explanation A very brief No explanation
with FIVE components 3.25 explanation of five of five components, and lack some explanation and lack was presented. 13
(i) research design, (ii) components with a few lacking. components. many components.
population and sample convincingly and
(for quantitative), coherently.
information about
respondents (quantitative)
/ key informants

12
(qualitative), (iii) research
instrument, (iv) data
collection procedure, (v)
data analysis procedure.

1 2 Reference APA style 7th All the references Many references Some references Only a few references No reference.
edition 0.50 follow APA strictly. follow APA strictly. follow APA. follow APA. 2
References should be
between 5 and 7
journals/articles/books.

Total 10.00 40

13
*QN = Question Number

PART 1: QUESTION 2 / POWERPOINT SLIDES (10 MARKS )

Criteria Weightage Excellent Good Fair Low Unsatisfactory/No Max Marks

14
QN CLO Response

4 3 2 1 0

2 3 Presentation slide They are creative, They are creative and Not interesting. Not interesting at all. No presentation slides
1.0 interesting, clear and interesting. were provided. 4
enhance the
effectiveness of the
presentation.

2 3 Contents All the information is Most of the information Information is valid Information is not Information is not valid
1.5 relevant and is relevant. but not related to the related to the and not related to the 6

15
appropriate for the purpose of the assignment. assignment at all.
requirements of the assignment.
slide presentation.

Total 2.5   10

*QN = Question Number

16
PART II: ONLINE CLASS PARTICIPATION (10 MARKS)

Online Class CLO Criteria Weighting Excellent Good Fair Poor No Maximum
Question response marks

17
4 3 2 1 0

(a) Are teachers Quality  • All the five • All the five • All the five • All the five responses No
considered of 2.5 responses or comments responses or responses or or comments are not postings 10
professionals in Postings are very relevant and comments are comments are relevant and not related were
the teaching very meaningful relevant and quite relevant and • The postings are not given as
profession? Affective • The postings are meaningful entirely tactful in their approach proof of
Explain with Domain very tactful in their • The postings are meaningful • The responses are too participati
relevant 3 (A3) approach tactful in their • The postings brief (e.g. “I agree with on in the
examples. approach are quite tactful in Tina”) discussion
(b) Why do their approach
teachers need to
participate in
decision- making
in schools.

18
Total Marks 2.5 10

19

You might also like