TOMINJAO NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Tominjao, Daanbantayan, Cebu

FINAL EXAM IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your Final Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for all CHAPTERS will be your final score.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in these chapters will be considered PERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. Your research teacher will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
5. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
6. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
7. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
8. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
Excellent (10 points): Good: (9 points): Good to Average: (8 points): Below Average (7 and below):
Excellent to superior work in fair work in most aspects; Passing work, but in serious Confusing, lacks explanation or
all areas as indicated in the minor deficiency in relation to need of improvement in many completion; little conforming to
instructors’ written instructors’ written areas, especially in regard to instructors’ written
expectations; exemplary expectations regarding content, form and content; minimal expectations regarding content,
performance, participation, writing style or procedures; grasp of facts, analysis and writing style or procedures;
creativity and writing; fully adequate grasp of facts, application; very few clear overall, below professional
addresses the criterion; analysis, and practical statements or explanations quality standards; not quality
excellent grasp of facts, application; clear statements work
analysis and application; and explanations are limited,
consistently clear statements but above average quality
and explanations
Area of Assessment Points Earned
Research Title. (Area 1)
The title of the study clearly states the topic of the study with variables.
Rationale of the Study. (Area 2)
The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem
with supporting literature/studies.
Conceptual Framework. (Area 3)
The conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm and at least
three (3) supporting concepts that establish ground as bases for the research.
Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 4)
The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious
language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are
logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.
Significance of the Study. (Area 5)
The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides
benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be
used by practitioners or others in practical ways).
Statement of Null Hypothesis and Scope and Limitations/Delimitations. (Area 6)
The scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically
reiterating the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers must take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 7)

The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in
research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.
Review of Related Literature and Studies (Area 8)
Must contain at least 10 related literature and studies.
Research Design/Instruments/Respondents. (Area 9)

Clearly states the specific design, instruments and respondents used in the study.
Synthesis (Area 10)
Gives the over-all results of the research study.
General Comments:
_______/100

RUBRICS FINAL EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)

RC CODE SH-PROG-2A12-C210-008
ORAL DEFENSE

Researchers Presentatio Q&A Total Score

n (50 points)
(50 points)
Lead Researcher:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
Research Associate:

IVY C. ATUP, MAEd – Math

Subject Teacher
1. Why did you choose this topic?
2. What are the limitations you faced in writing this topic?
3. Why did you choose this method?
4. What are the recommendations of the study?
5. How did you relate your study to existing researches?
6. Can you summarize your research in just few sentences?
7. What is the weakness part of your work?
8. If you could start over, what have you done differently?
1. The most common question you may be asked is what you learned from the study you have done. You
have to sum up your entire study in a few sentences and remember the technical terms you have mentioned in
your research because that is what your examiner wants to hear from you.
2. The next question to follow by default is why you chose this particular topic or what your inspiration
behind this study was. This is one of the trickiest questions as you have to prove your convincing power to the
panel of the teachers that what you did is valuable for the society and was worth their time. Tell about how
zealous you were about this particular problem.
3. What is the importance of your study or how will it contribute or add up to the existing body of
knowledge?
4. You may be asked to summarize your key findings of the research.
5. What type of background research have you done for the study?
6. What are the limitations you have faced while writing?
7. Why did you choose this particular method or sample for the study?
8. What will you include if you are told to add something extra to the study?
9. What are the recommendations of your study?
10. Who identify your respondents and why you selected this particular age group?
11. What was your hypothesis and how you framed it?
12. If given a chance, would like to do something different with your work?
13. What are the limitations you faced while dealing with your samples?
14. How did you relate your study to the existing theories?
15. What is the future scope of this study?
16. What do you plan to do with your work after you have completed your degree?
17. What are the research variables you used?
18. Do you have any questions to be asked?
19. Did you evaluate your work?
20. How would you improve your work?

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your First Quarter Examination in Practical Research 2.
 2. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your First Quarter Examination composed of
seven
(7) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered PERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The
grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY.

RUBRICS FIRST QUARTER EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)

Excellent (30-28 points): Good: (27-25 points): Average: (24-22 points): Below Average (less than 20
Excellent to superior work in Good to fair work in most Passing work, but in serious points):
all areas as indicated in the aspects; minor deficiency in need of improvement in many Confusing, lacks explanation or
instructors’ written relation to instructors’ written areas, especially in regard to completion; little conforming to
expectations; exemplary expectations regarding content, form and content; minimal instructors’ written
performance, participation, writing style or procedures; grasp of facts, analysis and expectations regarding content,
creativity and writing; fully adequate grasp of facts, application; very few clear writing style or procedures;
addresses the criterion; analysis, and practical statements or explanations overall, below professional
excellent grasp of facts, application; clear statements quality standards; not quality
analysis and application; and explanations are limited, work
consistently clear statements but above average quality
and explanations
Area of Assessment Points Earned
Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)
The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem
with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical Background of the Study. (Area 2)

The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm
and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for
the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)

The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious
language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are
logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)

The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides
benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be
used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Statement of Null Hypothesis and Scope and Limitations/Delimitations. (Area 5) The

scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating
the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers must take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)

The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in
research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:
_______/90
RC CODE SH-PROG-2A12-C210-002
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score
Lead Researcher: SAMOSINO, JOHN LESTER
Asst. Lead Researcher: RABADON, MESIE
Research Associate: MOMO, TRICIA MARIE
Research Associate: PELANDAS, JACOB CLIFF
Research Associate: BORDADORA, KIM
Research Associate: CELESTIAL, YOLLY
Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT

Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your First Quarter Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your First Quarter Examination composed of
seven
(7) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered PERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The
grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY.

RUBRICS FIRST QUARTER EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)

Excellent (30-28 points): Good: (27-25 points):
Excellent to superior work in Good to fair work in most
all areas as indicated in the aspects; minor deficiency in
instructors’ written relation to instructors’ written
expectations; exemplary expectations regarding content,
performance, participation, writing style or procedures;
Average: (24-22 points):
Passing work, but in serious
need of improvement in many
areas, especially in regard to
form and content; minimal
grasp of facts, analysis and
Below Average (less than 20
points):
Confusing, lacks explanation or
completion; little conforming to
instructors’ written
expectations regarding content,

creativity and writing; fully adequate grasp of facts, application; very few clear writing style or procedures;
addresses the criterion; analysis, and practical statements or explanations overall, below professional
excellent grasp of facts, application; clear statements quality standards; not quality
analysis and application; and explanations are limited, work
consistently clear statements but above average quality
and explanations
Area of Assessment Points Earned
Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)
The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem
with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical Background of the Study. (Area 2)

The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm
and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for
the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)

The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious
language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are
logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)

The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides
benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be
used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Statement of Null Hypothesis and Scope and Limitations/Delimitations. (Area 5) The

scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating
the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers must take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)

The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in
research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:
_______/90

RC CODE SH-PROG-2A12-C210-003
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score
Lead Researcher: TRASMONTE, LEILA MAE
Asst. Lead Researcher: CHIONG, AIRANIÑA
Research Associate: PITOGO, RYAN
Research Associate: BALABA, STEPHEN
Research Associate: OLIVIA, JIMMUEL
Research Associate: ARROYO, ABBE
Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT

Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your First Quarter Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your First Quarter Examination composed of
seven
(7) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered PERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
 7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The
grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY.

RUBRICS FIRST QUARTER EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)

Excellent (30-28 points): Good: (27-25 points): Average: (24-22 points): Below Average (less than 20
Excellent to superior work in Good to fair work in most Passing work, but in serious points):
all areas as indicated in the aspects; minor deficiency in need of improvement in many Confusing, lacks explanation or
instructors’ written relation to instructors’ written areas, especially in regard to completion; little conforming to
expectations; exemplary expectations regarding content, form and content; minimal instructors’ written
performance, participation, writing style or procedures; grasp of facts, analysis and expectations regarding content,
creativity and writing; fully adequate grasp of facts, application; very few clear writing style or procedures;
addresses the criterion; analysis, and practical statements or explanations overall, below professional
excellent grasp of facts, application; clear statements quality standards; not quality
analysis and application; and explanations are limited, work
consistently clear statements but above average quality
and explanations
Area of Assessment Points Earned
Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)
The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem
with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical Background of the Study. (Area 2)

The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm
and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for
the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)

The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious
language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are
logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)

The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides
benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be
used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Statement of Null Hypothesis and Scope and Limitations/Delimitations. (Area 5) The

scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating
the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers must take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)

The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in
research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:
_______/90

RC CODE SH-PROG-2A12-C210-004
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score
Lead Researcher: ROSALES, VANREY CHRIS
Asst. Lead Researcher: RUEDAS, RAYVEN JOHN
Research Associate: PANSOY, MAY VALERIE
Research Associate: TABAR, ARBY
Research Associate: TULABING, SHEILA
Research Associate:
Research Associate:
 NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT
Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your First Quarter Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your First Quarter Examination composed of
seven
(7) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered PERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The
grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY.

RUBRICS FIRST QUARTER EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)

Excellent (30-28 points): Good: (27-25 points): Average: (24-22 points): Below Average (less than 20
Excellent to superior work in Good to fair work in most Passing work, but in serious points):
all areas as indicated in the aspects; minor deficiency in need of improvement in many Confusing, lacks explanation or
instructors’ written relation to instructors’ written areas, especially in regard to completion; little conforming to
expectations; exemplary expectations regarding content, form and content; minimal instructors’ written
performance, participation, writing style or procedures; grasp of facts, analysis and expectations regarding content,
creativity and writing; fully adequate grasp of facts, application; very few clear writing style or procedures;
addresses the criterion; analysis, and practical statements or explanations overall, below professional
excellent grasp of facts, application; clear statements quality standards; not quality
analysis and application; and explanations are limited, work
consistently clear statements but above average quality
and explanations
Area of Assessment Points Earned
Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)
The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem
with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical Background of the Study. (Area 2)

The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm
and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for
the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)

The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious
language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are
logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)

The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides
benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be
used by practitioners or others in practical ways).
Statement of Null Hypothesis and Scope and Limitations/Delimitations. (Area 5) The
scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating
the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers must take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)

The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in
research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:
_______/90

RC CODE SH-PROG-2A12-C210-005
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score
Lead Researcher: ESPINOZA, ROMMEL VINCENT
Asst. Lead Researcher: ENRIQUEZ, GODWIN
CLAYD
Research Associate: MUÑASQUE, CATHERINE MAE
Research Associate: MONICIT, CHRISTINE MAE
Research Associate: MATARANAS, REX
Research Associate: ABANID, RYAN
Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT

Research Lecturer

GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your First Quarter Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your First Quarter Examination composed of
seven
(7) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered PERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.

7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The
grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY.

RUBRICS FIRST QUARTER EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)

Excellent (30-28 points): Good: (27-25 points): Average: (24-22 points): Below Average (less than 20
Excellent to superior work in Good to fair work in most Passing work, but in serious points):
all areas as indicated in the aspects; minor deficiency in need of improvement in many Confusing, lacks explanation or
instructors’ written relation to instructors’ written areas, especially in regard to completion; little conforming to
expectations; exemplary expectations regarding content, form and content; minimal instructors’ written
performance, participation, writing style or procedures; grasp of facts, analysis and expectations regarding content,
creativity and writing; fully adequate grasp of facts, application; very few clear writing style or procedures;
addresses the criterion; analysis, and practical statements or explanations overall, below professional
excellent grasp of facts, application; clear statements quality standards; not quality
analysis and application; and explanations are limited, work
consistently clear statements but above average quality
and explanations
Area of Assessment Points Earned
Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)
The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem
with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical Background of the Study. (Area 2)

The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm
and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for
the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)

The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious
language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are
logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)

The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides
benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be
used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Statement of Null Hypothesis and Scope and Limitations/Delimitations. (Area 5) The

scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating
the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers must take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)

The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in
research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.

Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)

Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:
_______/90

RC CODE SH-PROG-2A12-C210-006
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score
Lead Researcher: CAHAYAGAN, MARY ROSE
Asst. Lead Researcher: LAPINIG, MARY JOY
Research Associate: DIAMOS, CLINT D’ART
VINCENT
Research Associate: ALVADA, VICTOR
Research Associate: AGCOL, JASON
Research Associate: TABANAO, REEJAY
Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT

Research Lecturer
 GENERAL RULES

1. This assessment rubric will be used in evaluating your First Quarter Examination in Practical Research 2.
2. The total score for Chapter 1: Introduction will be your First Quarter Examination composed of
seven
(7) areas.
3. Remember, ALL the areas in this chapter will be considered PERFORMANCE TASKS.
4. All researchers will have the same score ONLY in area 7.
5. Make sure to put the corrected versions of your output as this will be final and irrevocable except
for suggestions and recommendations by your research instructor.
6. Your research instructor will rate the output based on the rubrics below.
7. The lead researcher will rate his/her research associates based on the gravity of effort shared. The
lead researcher MUST see to it that there is a proper basis for the grade he/she will give. The
grading will be done in front of the research associates to avoid biases/personal gains.
8. NO EXTENSIONS will be given in the submission.
9. The lead researcher shall submit all the outputs to the instructor.
10. The output SHOULD be clean and presentable. Print all the documents in SHORT BOND ONLY.
11. The score given will be final and irrevocable.
12. Submit your output on or before August 20, 2018. The submission is until 6:00 pm ONLY.

RUBRICS FIRST QUARTER EXAMINATION IN PRACTICAL RESEARCH 2 (QUANTITATIVE)

Excellent (30-28 points): Good: (27-25 points): Average: (24-22 points): Below Average (less than 20
Excellent to superior work in Good to fair work in most Passing work, but in serious points):
all areas as indicated in the aspects; minor deficiency in need of improvement in many Confusing, lacks explanation or
instructors’ written relation to instructors’ written areas, especially in regard to completion; little conforming to
expectations; exemplary expectations regarding content, form and content; minimal instructors’ written
performance, participation, writing style or procedures; grasp of facts, analysis and expectations regarding content,
creativity and writing; fully adequate grasp of facts, application; very few clear writing style or procedures;
addresses the criterion; analysis, and practical statements or explanations overall, below professional
excellent grasp of facts, application; clear statements quality standards; not quality
analysis and application; and explanations are limited, work
consistently clear statements but above average quality
and explanations
Area of Assessment Points Earned
Rationale of the Study. (Area 1)
The rationale of the study clearly states its purpose appropriate for the research problem
with supporting literature/studies.

Theoretical Background of the Study. (Area 2)

The theoretical – conceptual framework of the study provides a clear research paradigm
and at least three (3) supporting theories and concepts that establish ground as bases for
the research.

Problem/Purpose Statement. (Area 3)

The problem/purpose statement section states the research problem in direct and obvious
language and the problem is properly placed in a relevant context. Sub-problems are
logically arranged and clearly stated the issues to be answered.

Significance of the Study. (Area 4)

The significance of the study is clearly stated the need for research and provides
benefactors of the research in different areas of discipline (i.e., how the research might be
used by practitioners or others in practical ways).

Statement of Null Hypothesis and Scope and Limitations/Delimitations. (Area 5) The

scope and limitations section provide a clear direction of the study specifically reiterating
the sets of the scope and limitations the researchers must take.

Definition of Terms. (Area 6)

The definition of terms follows the alphabetical order and has included key terms in
research with a clear definition of difficult and key words in the study.
Grammar, Sentence Construction, and APA Style Format. (Area 7)
Grammar and sentence construction are properly observed in all components of research.
Uses APA format to properly cite the reference material used for research.

General Comments:
_______/90

RC CODE SH-PROG-2A12-C210-007
PEER ASSESSMENT/EVALUATION

Researchers Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Total

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score
Lead Researcher: VILLAFRANCA, HEART HAROLD
Asst. Lead Researcher: SALONOY, EMMACULATE
Research Associate: RAMIREZ, ALCEL AZIEL
Research Associate: ANDOC, JOHN PHILIP
Research Associate: REALES, CHRISTOPHER
Research Associate: LANO, CHARLES JUSTIN
Research Associate:

NONIEL JOHN VASQUEZ ERNO, LPT

Research Lecturer