Republic of the Philippines

SORSOGON STATE UNIVERSITY

College of Teacher Education and Midwifery
Sorsogon City Campus
Magsaysay St., Sorsogon City

CRITERIA FOR RESEARCH PAPER

Research Paper Title. An Exploratory Study On Self-Regulated Problem Solving

(SERP’s) In Mathematics
Researcher/s: Camacho, Evita Carla R., Guamos, Carla and Japon, Hazel Jane M.

Highest Evaluator’s
Criteria Possible Rating
Rating
ORIGINALITY (20%)
1. Provision for new ideas. 10
2. Observance of IPR and proper acknowledgment 10
of sources.
TECHNICAL MERIT OF THE STUDY (30%)
1. Adequacy, attainability, and clarity of the 10
objectives.
2. Clarity of the rationale and the state-of-the-art o 5
analyze the problem
3. Methodology 10
a. Appropriate of research paper design and
statistical tools.
b. Sufficiency and relevance of variables.
c. Adequacy of data collection method.
4. Consistency of activities with research objectives 5
methodology and expected outputs.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FINDINGS (40%)
1. Importance of the project. 10
2. Contribution to instruction/education, science, 10
art, rural households, industry, community
sector, regional or national development.
3. Usefulness of the expected outputs or findings to 10
increase in scientific workforce.
4. Superiority of outputs to the existing 10
knowledge/information/technology.
MANUSCRIPT/WRITE-UP (10%)
1. Appropriateness and accuracy of language 5
(tone) and figures
2. Clarity, style, and logic 5
Total 100

___________________________________
Evaluator’s signature over printed name
 Republic of the Philippines
SORSOGON STATE UNIVERSITY
College of Teacher Education and Midwifery
Sorsogon City Campus
Magsaysay St., Sorsogon City

CRITERIA FOR ORAL PRESENTER

Research Paper Title. An Exploratory Study On Self-Regulated Problem Solving

(SERP’s) In Mathematics
Researcher/s: Camacho, Evita Carla R., Guamos, Carla and Japon, Hazel Jane M.

Criteria Highest Evaluator’s

Possibl Rating
e Rating
PRESENTATION (60%)
1. Clarity (vocal and visual) 10
2. Uniqueness and logical arrangement of the 20
presentation
3. Compliance to time allocation 10
4. Visual- impact of the presentation 20
ORAL DEFENSE (40%)
1. Confidence and/ or ability to respond to queries 20
2. Clarity and consistency of ideas 20
Total 100

___________________________________
Evaluator’s signature over printed name