CT075-3-2 Data Management Assignment Marking Scheme Page 1 of 3

Module Name: Data Management | Module Code: CT075-3-2-DTM

Explain the concepts related to data management, data

CLO1 warehousing and data mining (C2, PLO1). Final Exam

Apply suitable data management, data warehouse modelling

CLO2 and data mining techniques to solve specific problems (C3, Final Exam
PLO2).
Implement suitable data pre-processing techniques to clean a Individual Assignment -
CLO3 given dataset (C3, PLO2).
Data Pre-processing
Demonstrate research on the various techniques used in Individual Assignment -
CLO4 data mining within specified areas (A3, PLO9).
Research
Individual Assignment (25%): Research

  Question Vs Taxonomy  
Question   Affective Level  
No. Topic 1 2 3 4 5 PLO
  SQ SQ SQ SQ SQ  
Application of data mining techniques
1     80%   9
within a chosen area  
1 Presentation on research findings     20%     9
100
  Total        
%  

Marking Scheme:

Marks
Criteria Max Marks
Awarded
 Introduction to subject area 10

 Research findings 40

 Conclusion 10
 References – correct usage, relevance and
10
quantity
 Report layout – writing style, English language
10
usage, appropriate formatting
 Presentation 20

Total Marks (%) 100

Level 2 Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation 2020

CT075-3-2 Data Management
Application of data
mining techniques
within a chosen
area (80%)
Introduction to Subject Area
(10%)
Research Findings (40%)
Conclusion (10%)
References – correct usage,
relevance and quantity (10%)
Report layout – writing style,
English language usage,
appropriate formatting (10%)
Level 2
Distinction
80 - 100
Outstanding formulation of the Good formulation of the
introduction and elaborate
details on the subject area.
Outstanding evidence of wide
and deep systematic review
using multiple searches,
multiple databases.
The conclusion is perfect, and
address the study area with
outstanding implications and
recommendations.
There is full, accurate, and
professional citations of very
recent sources and reliable
references with correct for-
mat.
A very good report has been
produced showing no
deficiencies in organization.
The work will be of a
professional standard.
Excellent and professional
writing, few grammatical or
spelling mistakes.
70 - 79
introduction with all
components and enough
details, but there are some
minor deficiencies in the
explanation about the subject
area.
Very careful reviewing,
systematic combinations of
search terms, with minor
deficiencies.
The conclusion is very good,
and shows good depth of the
study area. There are good
implications and
recommendations.
Source are generally cited
correctly, the majority of
references are recent and
reliable, and format is mostly
correct.
A report has been produced of
a good structure containing
suitable sections and pleasing
referencing.
Clear and consistent writing,
with few grammatical or
spelling errors.
Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation
Assignment Marking Scheme
Merit
60 - 69
Introduction to the subject
area is written well, but few
components are not in
appropriate depth and details.
Most components are clear
and can be understood.
Evidence of reviewing and
using appropriate approaches,
but the scope is not enough
wide and deep.
Good conclusion which shows
the depth in the study area,
but still could be improved.
Recommendations are given,
but needs some improvement.
Citations are mostly done, and
references are up to date, but
there are some outdated and
non-reliable sources, suitable
format.
A reasonable report has been
produced with all required
sections. In areas, there will be
minor deficiencies such as
layout or poor referencing.
Generally good writing, some
errors, inconsistent spellings.
Pass
50 - 59
Satisfactory introduction and
the report can be understood
and justified, but there are
some major deficiencies in
some components.
Incomplete and not
systematic, but adequate to
identify part of the literature.
The conclusion is satisfactory,
but does not address the study
area fully. Recommendations
are partially addressed.
References and citations are
acceptable, but lack of high
quality and professional
sources, acceptable format
with some mistakes.
The created report is weak in
its presentation. Sections
required will be present but
not addressed at a suitable
level.
Writing is not very good, but
still understandable, with
some errors and inconsisten-
cies.
Fail
40 - 49
Fails to identify and justify
the introduction to the
subject area. But there are
some efforts to formulate an
explanation about the
subject.
Fails to sufficiently identify
the literature to yield an in-
formative review.
There are some conclusions
and recommendations, but
not very relevant. It does not
address the subject area.
Inadequate citations of
sources, outdated and unre-
liable references, poor for-
mat with many mistakes.
The report is very poor in
presentation with its
construction lacking
elements of the report (e.g.
unsuitable structuring).
Poor, grammar sometimes
makes meaning difficult to
interpret, Inconsistent
spelling, or grammar.
Page 2 of 3
0 – 39
Very weak introduction, and
there are major deficiencies
in most parts of the subject
area.
Little or no evidence of a
systematic approach,
incomplete review.
There is no or very little
evidence of conclusion and
recommendations.
Very poor citations, refer-
ences, and format.
The written document does
not adequately represent a
report.
Falls far below the standard
for submission and is
frequently difficult to follow.
2019
CT075-3-2 Data Management Assignment Marking Scheme Page 3 of 3

Presentation on Distinction Merit Pass Fail

research findings
80 - 100 70 - 79 60 - 69 50 – 59 40 - 49 0 - 39
(20%)
The presentation was The presentation had a clear The presentation had a clear The presentation had a mod- The presentation was No presentation or
excellent, with a clear structure and included most of structure and included most of the erately clear structure and in- weak in terms of very poor
structure and included all the the necessary parts and details. required sections, but some details cluded the required contents, but structure, contents, and presentation.
Communication Skills
necessary parts and contents Time Management and English were not presented. Time details of contents are not details.
(10%)
with details. Time presentation were good. management and English provided. Time management and Time management and
management, and English presentation needed to be English presentation were English presentation
presentation were excellent. improved. satisfactory. were weak.
The student was able to The student was able to The student was able to interpret The student was able to interpret The student was not able The student did not
interpret correctly the interpret correctly the correctly the questions, and answer correctly some questions, and to interpret many answer or was not
questions, and answer questions, and answer accordingly. Responses to most of answer accordingly. Responses questions correctly, and able to interpret the
accordingly and very accordingly. Responses to questions were at the correct to questions were mainly at the responses were not I majority of questions,
confidently. Responses to questions were at the correct depth, and in an appropriate correct depth, and in an correct depth and and responses were
Questions and Answers
questions were at the correct depth, and in an appropriate language given the audience. A appropriate language given the appropriate to the not correct or in an
(10%)
depth, and in an appropriate language given the audience. A knowledge and understanding of audience. Knowledge of the question. A low level of appropriate language.
language given the audience. knowledge and understanding the subject area was mostly subject area was satisfactory. knowledge and
A deep knowledge and of the subject area was demonstrated. understanding of topic is
understanding of the subject demonstrated. demonstrated by the
area was demonstrated. student.

Level 2 Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation 2019