BOOKS

1. Build Competency Management System in Corporates: An implementation approach discovered

from Public Sector Companies (1st Ed.). Notion Press. ISBN No. 979-8890024176
2. Mechanism To Establish Performance Standards In Central Public Sector Enterprises: A
Compilation of selected guidelines of Department of Public Sector (1st Ed.). Amazon Kindle. ISBN
NO. 979-8376234549
3. Design your Mentorship Program: To improve productivity, performance and diversity of the organization (2nd
Ed.). Amazon. ISBN NO. 979-8852509789
4. Job Analysis: A comprehensive tool for job design, re-design & work standardization (1st Ed.). Amazon Kindle KDP. ASIN
No. B0CDQWGW2S
5. Guidelines for Safe Working of Organisation during COVID-19 Pandemic. Bureau of Indian Standards.
IS 17472 : 2020
CHAPTERS
1. Contribution of PSUs in building Competent workforce for the Nation (chapter) in “Revisiting Sustainable
Development Goals for Nation Building: Repositioning India as a Vishwmitra with Vishwa Mantra” (pp. 161–179) by Indian Institute of Public
Administration, New Delhi, ISBN No. 978-81-955533-7-2
2. Strategies for increasing the contribution of Women in Nation Building (chapter) in “Revisiting Sustainable
Development Goals for Nation Building: Repositioning India as a Vishwmitra with Vishwa Mantra” (pp. 59–72) by Indian Institute of Public
Administration, New Delhi ISBN No. 978-81-955533-7-2
3. HEC Model & Policy Framework to Develop Community Practices of Circular Economy (chapter) in
"Integrated Waste Management: The Circular Economy" (pp. 37–58) by Cambridge Scholars Publishing. ISBN No. 1-5275-9461-0

4. Role of Business Intelligence and HR Planning in Modern Industrialization (Chapter) in "Business

Intelligence and Human Resource Management: Concept, Cases, and Practical Applications" (1st ed.), eBook ISBN: 9781003184928; Productivity
Press (Routelage Taylor & Francis
RESEARCH ARTICLES
1. Digital Roadmap for Corporate Governance; Chartered Secretary: The Journal for Governance Professionals;
Vol. 52(08); Aug, 2022; pp. 36-42
2. Standards & Trends in Online Shopping; Asian Resonance; Vol. III (01); Jan, 2014, pp. 6-9; ISSN: 0976-8602
3. Authentication Methods: A Review; Productivity; 52 (04); Jan-Mar, 2012; pp. 243-248; ISSN: 0032-992; e-ISSN:
0976-3902
4. Impact of Promotion on Consumer Attitude for Shopping of Electronic Goods; Journal of
Commerce, Economics & Computer Science; Vol. 01(02), April-June, 2015; pp. 151-160; ISSN: 2395-7069
5. Fusion of Vedic and Modern Education Systems as per Social Need Assessment; DStreet Dravya
2023: Annual Business and Investment Journal; Vol. 2.0; Jan, 2024; pp. 6.1-6.5
UNDER PUBLICATIONS
1. Compensation and Reward Management
2. PIM Framework for impactful CSR Projects: A research based approach
to create best practices
3. Labour Productivity Indexes of Public Sector
4. DEI Model for Inclusive Growth of Companies & Development of
Human Resource
5. National Skill Data Grid: empowering workforce development and
organizational transformation
6. A case study on Data Governance and Quality Index framework of
NITI Aayog
7. Enhancing People Management through Strategic Analytics
 Vision Grading Confidentiality
Appraisal
Approach
ACR Judgemental Non-numerical Non-disclosable except Linear
adverse comments
APAR Developmental Numerical Disclosable Division

Conclusion:
• Appraisal should be developmental, not judgemental.
• Non-communication of comments is arbitrary.
• Grading/Comments must be shown.
• Right to representation
Last Date to Submit Action
31st March Distribute blank APAR to Ratee
15th April Submission of self-appraisal by Ratee
30th June Reporting Officer to Reviewing Officer
31st July Reviewing Officer to Accepting Authority or APAR cell
31st August Accepting Authority, if any, approves
10th September /10th October Disclosure to Ratee/In case of Accepting Authority
Within 15 days from date of disclosure Representation by Ratee
30th September /31st October Forwarding Representation to Competent Authority/In
case of Accepting Authority
One month Disposal of representation
Within 15 days of decision by the Competent Authority Communication of disposal to Ratee
 x<4 4≤ x <6 6≤ x <8 8≤ x ≤10
Poor Average Good Outstanding
(9 as average for empanelment/promotion)

Note:
1. Minimum Grading of APAR required to get Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) is 7
2. Minimum Grading of APAR to get promotion is 4
 RO RA AA

RO
Accomplishment of planned work/work
allotted as per subjects allotted
Quality of output
Analytical ability
Accomplishment of exceptional work
unforeseen tasks performed
Overall Grading on ‘Work Output’
RA AA Attitude to work
Sense of Responsibility
Maintenance of Discipline
Communication Skills
Leadership Qualities
Capacity to work in team spirit
Capacity to work in time limits
Inter-personal relations
Overall Grading on “Personal
Attributes”
 RO RA AA
Knowledge of rules/regulations/procedures in the area of function
and ability to apply them correctly
Strategic planning ability
Decision making ability
Coordination ability
Ability to motivate and develop subordinates
Overall Grading on “Functional Competence”
 Weightage RO RA
Marks Weighted marks Marks Weighted marks
Work Output 40% A =40%xA P =40%xP
Personal Attributes 30% B =30%xB Q =30%xQ
Functional Competence 30% C =30%xC R =30%xR
Overall Grade ∑RO ∑RA

Note:
Filling Integrity Column: In case of doubtful integrity, a secret note is attached to APAR by RO and with the approval of RA.
RO Ratee Higher to RO
(HRO)

• sent copy of • Representation • Disposal of

APAR on upgradation Representation
of grading or in 30 days
expansion of
comments in 15
days
DPE’s MoU Framework
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU)

Action Aspect
Issues policies Corporate Governance
related to General Management
Wage
Performance
Other Matters
Agreement Memorandum of Agreement
CPSEs → Administrative M/D
Monitoring Administrative M/D
DPE
Award/Penalty Ratings
Weightage
Incentive Performance Related Pay

21
Setup Objectives and Key Result Areas (OKR)

Part No. Parameter Max Marks Part Parameter Max Marks

Revenue 5 No.

Physical Output 20 CSR Guidelines -1

A Corporate Governance -3
CAPEX 10
Forex earning/saving 8 E Asset Monetization -1

B Profitability 30 Procurement -3

Procurement 2 Health and Safety -1

C Trade Receivables 8 TOTAL -9

R&D 2
D Value Creation 15
TOTAL 100
 MoU Evaluation Process
Performance of CPSEs

Parameters Framework Evaluation

• Revenue from Operations S. Category Max Marks MoU Score MoU Rating
• Asset Turnover Ratio No.
Score ≥ 90 Excellent
• EBDITA 1 Revenue, Physical 43
• Return on Net Worth Output, CAPEX and Forex Score ≥ 70 Very Good
earning
• Return on Capital Score ≥ 50 Good
/ saving
• Market Capitalization 2 Profitability 30 Score ≥ 33 Fair
• CAPEX
• Export-Import 3 Procurement, Trade 12 Score < 33 Poor
Receivable and R&D
• Procurement from MSEs,
4 Value creation for 15
• GeM Procurement
Shareholders
• DPE guidelines compliance 5 TOTAL 100

6 Compliance Parameters -09

23
APAR (2010) Channel of Submission
• CEO level (SECY → Minister → Minister)
Common Format
• FD level (CEO level → SECY → Minister)
• Top Management: CEO, Functional Directors, • ED level (FD level → CEO level → CEO level)
Executive Directors (E9), GM (E8) • GM level (ED level → FD level → CEO level

Components Monitoring
• JS at Administrative Ministry
• MoU Targets
• CPSE Nodal Officer
• Individual Targets
• Personal Attributes and Functional competencies Additional Information
• Annual Medical Examination, Annual
Time Schedule Property Return, Training Program
Attended, Additional Qualification Acquired
• Finalization of Targets/Relative Weights
Grading
• Blank Form, Self-Appraisal (60 days), Appraisal
(15 days), Review (15 days), Acceptance (15 • Bell Curve Approach
days), Disclosure (15 days), Representation (15 • Only 10-15% graded excellent (1-1.5)
days), Repository (15 days)
24
Performance Appraisal of Top Management

Designation Weightage
MoU Individual targets Personal attributes and Total
target flowing from MoU functional competencies
targets
Chief Executives 75 - 25 100
Functional 40 35 25 100
Directors
Executive Directors 25 50 25 100
(E9) & General
Managers (E8)

25
SPARROW
NIC developed for IAS Officer (2018-19) and CPSE Officers (2019-20)

Officers Purpose Implement

Nodal Officer Clearing Probation SPARROW
Application
Officer Reported Upon Confirmation
Reporting Officer Promotion
Reviewing Officer CSS Selection
/Deputation
Accepting Authority
Sensitive Posting
FR 56(j)
26
 Workflow Authorization & Document
Setting Access Roles Upload option

Centralized Database
Digital Signing & e- Online PAR De-Centralized
Signing Generation Administration

Delegation
Linkage to eOffice Alerts & Notifications
( Authority &
PIMS
Permission)
SPARROW - Process
Custodian

Select the Assessment

Select Period of Assessment, Define channel of PAR
Year and Officer
Work Status and Form Type submission of APAR Generation
Reported Upon

Service Controlling Authority

Channel Hierarchy
Representation Section wise
DOSSIER
Basic Information
Put For

Officer fill Self

Officer Appraisal
Accept Acceptance

Reporting Authority
Custodian
Reviewing Authority

PAR Completion
PAR Discloser Accepting Authority
(Closure)
SPARROW system for Top Management

S. No. Appraisal by Time Schedule Force Forward by Ministry

of Nodal Officer
1 Self-appraisal to Reporting Officer 31st October
2 Reporting Officer 15th November 5th December
3 Reviewing Authority 30th November 20th December
4 Accepting Authority 31st December

30
PAR Flow
Standard Representation Referral Memorial against
Assessment
• Custodian • Officer • Officer • Officer
• Officer • Custodian • Custodian • Custodian
• Reporting Authority • Representation Board • Referral Board • Competent Authority
• Reviewing Authority • Custodian • Custodian • Custodian
• Accepting Authority • Officer • Officer • Officer
• Custodian • PAR is closed • PAR is closed • PAR is closed
• Officer
• PAR is closed

SPARROW p. 12
 PMS

Thank You
Dr Nitin Aggrawal
+91 987-158-3751

nitin.varnit@gmail.com

linkedin.com/in/nitinaggrawal/