You are on page 1of 48

Storying Social Movement/s: Remaking

Meaning in the Mobilization of Identity


1st Edition Louise Gwenneth Phillips
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebookmass.com/product/storying-social-movement-s-remaking-meaning-in-the
-mobilization-of-identity-1st-edition-louise-gwenneth-phillips/
PALGRAVE STUDIES IN MOVEMENT ACROSS EDUCATION,
THE ARTS AND THE SOCIAL SCIENCES

Storying Social
Movement/s
Edited by
Louise Gwenneth Phillips
Tracey Bunda
Palgrave Studies in Movement across Education,
the Arts and the Social Sciences

Series Editors
Alexandra Lasczik
Faculty of Education
Southern Cross University
Bilinga, QLD, Australia

Rita L. Irwin
Department of Curriculum & Pedagogy
The University of British Columbia
Vancouver, BC, Canada
This series is a new and innovative proposition in the nascent and growing
space of movement studies. Emerging and established scholars who are
beginning to work within the contemporary practices and methods of
movement, seek resources such as this series seeks to provide. Education is
very much tied up within an awareness of space and place, for example, a
school can begin to take on an identity of its own, with as much learning
taking place within its corridors and playgrounds as occurs in the class-
rooms. As learners interact with these environments through movement it
is essential for researchers to understand how these experiences can be
understood, allowing for a very interdisciplinary approach. This series spe-
cifically explores a range of movement approaches, including but not lim-
ited to walking research, a relatively new and exciting field, along with
several other paradigmic lenses. The series will be commissioning in the
Palgrave Pivot format.
Louise Gwenneth Phillips • Tracey Bunda
Editors

Storying Social
Movement/s
Editors
Louise Gwenneth Phillips Tracey Bunda
Faculty of Education Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
Southern Cross University Studies Unit
Bilinga, QLD, Australia University of Queensland
St Lucia, QLD, Australia

Palgrave Studies in Movement across Education, the Arts and the Social Sciences
ISBN 978-3-031-09666-2    ISBN 978-3-031-09667-9 (eBook)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09667-9

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer
Nature Switzerland AG 2023
This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of
translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval,
electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information
in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the
­publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to
the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The
publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
­institutional affiliations.

Cover illustration: Pattern © Melisa Hasan

This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature
Switzerland AG.
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
To all activists who were, are and will be, for they teach and move many.
Foreword

Scholar activists need to write about our concerns, and the most powerful
way to express ourselves is through our writings. Writing is a way to empower
us, to state that we are not victims and that we are attempting to find answers
and to solve problems. (Devon Abbott Mihesuah, P. 23)

This book contains chapters from an incredible group of activists who


present their concepts, ideas, understandings, and specific events via their
storying. It is they who have decided how and what would be written and
re-written and what would be revealed and hence shared with others.
Writing in this way enables us as readers a deeper understanding of the
issues, events, and thinking behind the writing connecting the storyteller
and the reader/listener and enabling meaning making by both. In essence,
they bring forward the story of themselves as activists to the story of the
activism.
As activist scholars they offer their individual unapologetic interpreta-
tions of events, theories, and understandings, and give testimony to their
lives, along with the movements they are intimately engaged within. They
present a montage of real struggles, and actions, and no one way to see or
understand. It is their stories that form part of our learning, and for those
who are activists, they offer deeper understandings and ways of working
and combating complex problems within the world. While there are

vii
viii Foreword

differences presented in their stories and in their activism, there are also
similarities. Their collective work offers a greater understanding of scholar
activists and demonstrates how much the role of activist is central to who
they are as people, and the core of their very being. I am in awe!

The University of Queensland Bronwyn Fredericks


St Lucia, QLD, Australia Pro-Vice-Chancellor
(Indigenous Engagement)

Reference
Mihesuah, D. A. (2003). Indigenous American women: Decolonization, empower-
ment, activism (1st ed.). Nebraska Press.
Standing Foreword

What does it mean to stand up, stand against, stand with and stand for
some-thing in this moment we find ourselves? What does it mean to be
one who stands, one who under-stands, one who can with-stand and one
who takes a stand? The stories in this book stand. They stand strong, they
stand proud, they stand tall and they stand together—standing, anything
becomes possible. These stories of standing are stories that we rarely hear.
They are stories that we need to hear—over and over again, until we have
heard them. Standing, stories sneak up on truths we barely understand as
we try to figure them out in order to make a cruel world a more just and
bearable place. Standing, stories tell their own truths in their own way and
those speaking the stories are never left standing on their own.
My maternal grandmother’s family were coal miners in Cornwall,
women who remained standing long after their husband’s shoes were
placed on the kitchen table. Still today, there is an unwritten rule in my
house that new shoes are never to be stood on a table anywhere in the
house, not least of all the kitchen. I asked my Mum recently where this
custom had come from and she very proudly explained, “Well, it’s all to
do with your great grandfather, he was a Union man and a delegate to
boot”. I wish I knew more about my great grandfather—and my great
grandmother, the story is that she too stood for justice but by standing by,
with, for and up for the rights of women workers. This little-known story
of standing stands strong in the blood and bones of my memory. It has
stood the test of time and has often return to stand beside me in in my
own work as a Unionist feminist in the National Tertiary Education Union
(NTEU) of Australia. Standing: refusing to be a bystander even though

ix
x Standing Foreword

you know the work is hard and your feet are going to hurt. Standing:
holding your ground and position in places where the might and right of
power and privilege push you right onto the edges of fear and precarity.
Standing: an ethical and performative activist force which is not willing to
keep on going with the flow, regardless of the risk. Standing: with a mega-
phone in your hand and heart negotiating the right to speak to make sure
that others can. Standing: making a call and making a claim to something
because standing there in that moment matters in ways we can only begin
to imagine. Standing: because not standing is not standing at all—if some-
one is going to put my work boots on the kitchen table, I want them to
hear and hold right down to their blood and bones that right to the very
end I remained standing.
Stories of activism stand with courage and encourage others to tell their
own. Stories of activism stand with moral conviction and move us to think
and wonder about what living a more ethical life might be and become.
Stories of activism stand so powerfully, as Dorothy Allison suggests, they
will have to be heard, understood and acted upon (p. 177). Standing with
arms open wide, the stories of activism shared here provide us with a
moment to hear them, honor them and hold them with hope for what
might come to happen in the world, standing.

Faculty of Education Professor Liz Mackinlay


Southern Cross University
QLD, Australia

Reference
Allison, D. (1994). Skin: Talking about sex, class and literature. Firebrand Books.
Preface

Once again, Tracey and Louise are storying. We, however, gather together
with others for storying.
But before we write of this gathered-together storying with others, we
locate ourselves, taking up the Indigenous Australian cultural/relational
practise of acknowledging country and people. We stand on ceremony
(Wilson, 2008).

We acknowledge the traditional owners of the country/land on which we write


and the various Aboriginal countries from which the various authors of this
book have contributed. We pay respect to Elders and all Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander peoples who have survived, struggled and thrived in providing
contribution to their own communities and to wider and global communities.
We too acknowledge the multitude of stories of the known, unknown and
never to be named Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander story tellers of these
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander countries for it is their stories which have
spoken, painted, sung and danced all countries into being. This work, over
thousands of generations, has allowed us to be the beneficiaries of the various
countries where we now stand to continue the art and act through, with and as
storying.

Here, we extend storying with movement. We position the notion of


movement broadly: conceptualising movement as activism, but we also
incorporate movement as the stories the bodies tell. We have curated this
book to tell stories that are often not heard or seen: these are the stories of
movement in the margins. We name this location not only for ourselves
but also for the contributing authors who write their stories from the

xi
xii Preface

spaces of being widely unknown, new and experienced writers, and from
places where the voices of their movement experiences have been muted
and sometimes silenced. And in the memory of bell hooks, this location—
the margins—is a site of radical possibility (hooks, 2015). The majority of
contributors in this book are not scholars but rather live their lives at a
distance from the academy, in worlds where their every day is a theoretical
practice—analysing the need of the world to be different, conceptualising
how this can be so, delving deeper through methodologies that decon-
struct, disrupt and by making reference to others to find the right ‘ah-ha,
yes this will work’ solutions. Theoretical lives are stories and all of the
stories in the book form and inform a place where our voices collect, shift-
ing to stand with each other, where we are moving/writing together. The
stories in the book speak of resistance for protecting the earth and coun-
try; that in creating space for those who are voiceless and powerless there
is creative intercept; in thinking deeply about being through an ethically
just care practice and how the choreographing of stories in dance main-
tains traditions for next generations. We propose that through the varied
contributions from Indigenous, youth, and diverse identities and commu-
nities in the following chapters, we gain insight into how on-the-ground
movements work to produce change through story. Story and movement,
we acknowledge, are never far from each other.

Bilinga, QLD, Australia Louise Gwenneth Phillips


St Lucia, QLD, Australia  Tracey Bunda

References
hooks, b. (2015). Feminist theory: From margin to centre. South End Press.
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood
Publishing.
Contents

1 Storying:
 The Vitality of Social Movements  1
Tracey Bunda and Louise Gwenneth Phillips

2 Learning
 with Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta Activism 19
Simone Tur

3 How
 Breaking the Rules Is Changing the World 47
Ella Simons

4 Kooriography:
 Revolutionary Acts of Dance 61
Mariaa Randall

5 Brotherhood
 of the Wordless: Voiceless Wonders 79
Alice Owen

6 Always
 Pull Your People Up with You: The Liworaji
Aboriginal Corporation 99
Lilly Davidson and Maria Davidson

7 Developing
 an Individuated Sensibility at the Margins117
Agli Zavros-Orr

Index147

xiii
Notes on Contributors

Tracey Bunda is Academic Director of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait


Islander Studies Unit, University of Queensland, Australia.
Lilly Davidson and Maria Davidson are Yuggera women and sisters
who have lived their lives and raised their families in Ipswich and Brisbane
since the 1950s. The sisters have extensive experience in working for gov-
ernment and non-government organisations including Save the Children
Fund, the Red Cross, Department of Education, Catholic Education and
Department of Human Services, with Lillian holding the position of
Manager for a shelter for the homeless for approximately ten years. Their
work experience combines with multiple decades of lived experience of
Aboriginal communities. As founding members of the Liworaji Aboriginal
Corporation, their passion is to advocate for those within the Aboriginal
community who do not have a voice, who are not seen and are
disempowered.
Alice Owen is a speech pathologist with 50 years of experience in a vari-
ety of settings in UK and Australia. She also is a qualified dance therapist
with 29 years of experience in private practice. Since 1991 her work has
mainly been with children and adults with complex communication needs
and movement difficulties and diversity. As she has a lifetime interest and
experience in the arts including dance, theatre, singing and creative writ-
ing, she has always incorporated the arts into her therapy.
Louise Gwenneth Phillips is an Associate Professor in Education at
Southern Cross, University, Australia.

xv
xvi NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS

Mariaa Randall belongs to the Bundjalung and Yaegl people of the Far
North Coast of NSW. She resides on the lands of the Djadjawurung in
Bendigo and works extensively on Wurundjeri and Boonwurrung coun-
tries in Melbourne. Mariaa is a 1997 NAISDA Dance College Graduate
and the Victorian College of the Arts, University of Melbourne, obtaining
a Graduate Certificate in Indigenous Arts Management, Graduate
Diploma in Performance Creation and a Master in Animateuring (by
Research).
Ella Simons is a 15-year-old school strike for climate (SS4C) organizers
based on Yalukit Willam land in so-called Melbourne. She helped organize
the most recent student strikes for climate action in Melbourne and con-
tinues organizing the movement on a local and national level. Ella has
been organizing with SS4C since the 2019 election, which for her was a
turning point in the urgency for climate action and the need for the youth
activist movement to step up. From a young age, Ella has always loved the
outdoors and visiting her grandparents.
Simone Tur is an Associate Professor, from the Anangu community in
north-west South Australia and resides on Kaurna Yarta, Adelaide. She is
the inaugural Pro Vice-Chancellor (Indigenous) at Flinders University.
Her previous leadership roles in higher education include Director of the
Yunggorendi First Nations Centre for Higher Education and Research
from 2011 to 2015 and Associate Dean Tjilbruke Teaching and Learning
within Flinders’ Office of Indigenous Strategy and Engagement between
2015 and 2017.
Agli Zavros-Orr is an academic who advocates for an ethic of just-care in
educative contexts from an anti-bias approach. Agli is the founder of
diversitywise.com.au and undertakes advocacy and activist role within the
Victorian Intersex Expert Advisory Group (IEAG), is the chair for Intersex
Human Right Australia (IHRA), and Victorian Representative for Intersex
Peer Support Australia (IPSA).
List of Figures

Fig. 3.1 Ella being interviewed 53


Fig. 3.2 Ella at the Student Strike rally Melbourne, 21 May 2021 54
Fig. 4.1 I, dentity—Dancer Mariaa Randall. Photograph Jeff Busby 70
Fig. 5.1 Book cover of Triumph, revelation, transformation 95
Fig. 7.1 Journaling—Image by Agli 130
Fig. 7.2 Writing by Agli 135
Fig. 7.3 Collating by Agli 139

xvii
CHAPTER 1

Storying: The Vitality of Social Movements

Tracey Bunda and Louise Gwenneth Phillips

Abstract Story and storying have long held a compelling symbolic place
in social movements. We begin by sharing who we (Tracey and Louise) are
in story and social movements. We then set the scene for the book, with
our conceptualisation of storying movement by drawing from a/historical
and theoretical threads of stories, storytelling, activism, body, community,
and collective agency and how they knot together offering differing con-
figurations and wisdoms for being human. How story and movement hold
a long, entangled history together is discussed, elaborating on the five
principles we spoke for in storying research. We locate storying social
movements in new social movement theory as networked and collective
identities creating social change through story, told with words and bod-
ies. The power of dance in storying social movement is highlighted
through illustrations as the movement of social movements, provoking the

T. Bunda
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies Unit, University of Queensland,
St Lucia, QLD, Australia
e-mail: t.bunda@uq.edu.au
L. G. Phillips (*)
Faculty of Education, Southern Cross University, Bilinga, QLD, Australia
e-mail: louise.phillips@scu.edu.au

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature 1


Switzerland AG 2023
L. G. Phillips, T. Bunda (eds.), Storying Social Movement/s, Palgrave
Studies in Movement across Education, the Arts and the Social
Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09667-9_1
2 T. BUNDA AND L. G. PHILLIPS

embodiment of change and transformation. Further, we acknowledge the


profound breadth of learning that takes place in activism and elevated/
illuminated through critical race theory, decolonisation, and feminist the-
orising in storying as a key vehicle for meaning making and communica-
tion. We close with an overview of the composition of this edited collection
of black and white storied social movements in Australia.

Keywords Storying • Social movements • Activism • Wilfulness •


Dance • Social movement learning theory

Who We Are in Story and Social Movements


Tracey: Stories of movement in the margins—from that which is not often
seen, to that which is generally not known, in those places deemed our
locations—that deny and disparage our efforts to sustain our being; in
places and spaces from which we are supposedly fixed; places and spaces
from which we cannot rise. I know this place. I remember this place, I
remember others’—Aboriginal others—memories of this place and I
remember too that this is a place not of our own choosing. And, in case I
forget, sometimes the coloniser will take me back to the temper of this
place to remind me of the margins, where I and other Aboriginal peo-
ples—Goories, in my language—should be. My first ‘coming into a sense
of political being’ recalls this place in visual memory of my family’s and
other Aboriginal families’ actual physical/geographical location of living
outside of town. If a line could be drawn from that place where my old
peoples were incarcerated, the old Salvation Army Mission—Purga—a
place where many Aboriginal families and their ancestors had been incar-
cerated, to the centre of town, then this line would mark the separation
between black and white. It was an invisible line leading from the place of
marginality to the town centre where plenty abided. This line was drawn
as a reminder from the white and the powerful to ensure that Aboriginal
families would know our place. Even after this Mission closed many
Aboriginal families and individuals stayed close to where it had once been
located. Black fellas live here, this was our place. As a child, this was my
Aboriginal world. Perhaps from the perspective of white others, the
wealthy white others who did not have to share this location with us, there
was a sense that these locations represented deprivation and there is no
doubt we were (economically) poor but we were made poor. The machi-
nations of colonisation made us poor and made sure we stayed poor
1 STORYING: THE VITALITY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 3

generation upon generation upon generation. This characterisation was


not however the totality of our lives in this location. There was, in this
location, a richness that existed through the practice of traditions and
knowledges that maintained strong senses of who we were as Aboriginal
peoples, as humans unto ourselves even if that acknowledgement was not
forthcoming from white others.
To this day I can recite where the Aboriginal families lived behind that
imaginary line. The act of recalling is made easier because the line was
often travelled by my family—when visiting with other families, when
acknowledging members of the other families journeying on that line,
when we travelled for school, work, and other business. I recall no
Aboriginal families living in town though I do remember my mother tell-
ing me of one Aboriginal woman, married to a white man, who did live
there. The movement of Aboriginal families, shifting from the margins, to
be in and close to the predominately white living suburbs wasn’t until
much later, perhaps not until the 1970s and 1980s. And with this address
came other colonising expectations that Aboriginal families did not always
abide by or hold to as an absolute truth. Having lived through the era of
false (gammon) protectionism, (I say gammon in my way of speaking,
because policies of protection were thinly veiled acts of isolation, depriva-
tion, and punishment) Aboriginal peoples had to live through the machi-
nations of assimilation—to be white, to act white, to deny who we were.
Ridiculous really, how could we be white and why would we want to be?
Though it would never have been thought of in this way and at that time,
and for some of the Aboriginal families it may still not be thought of in
this way, but our acts of resistance, individually and collectively, revealed
the tensions between black and white. The colonising ethos that worked
at every turn to subjugate, was always going to be contested and resisted
and it was. Aboriginal sovereignties were not sleeping and had never been
ceded. Seemingly small acts of resistance by Aboriginal families to exist
and keep our human-ness were upheld by our men and women maintain-
ing employment, even when that employment meant hard physical labours
in unsafe spaces of regularly occurring racist slight; in accessing education
for the younger generations who themselves were part of a pioneering
brigade that broke through low expectation and educational neglect; and
through our socio-cultural prowess and sophistication in the arts and on
the sporting fields. The margins, in concert with strong senses of ourselves
through sovereignty, through our own knowledge of being human, is the
place from where we stepped over that partitioning line. My own power
4 T. BUNDA AND L. G. PHILLIPS

and privilege is as a direct result of those Aboriginal individuals and fami-


lies who stepped over that line. And I am grateful for that soulful courage.
Louise: As a fifth-generation white Australian travelling in India, when
I was 18, I was awakened to the lived realities of racism, sexism, and clas-
sism. On return, I searched for stories of the ongoing racism Aboriginal
Australian peoples have been (and continue to be) subjected to since colo-
nisation. January the next year was the bicentenary of the invasion of
Australia (1988), and I knew I had to join the largest protest in Sydney
(Gadi in Gadigal language) at the time to show my solidarity against the
genocide, violence, silencing, and lies this nation had been built on and
was celebrating with vile hypocrisy. I was honoured to walk with Aboriginal
Australian people, and continue to do so.
In winter that year, I was raped by a stranger in a park and kidnapped.
By 1990, I and two now dear friends formed a survivor’s advocacy group
(Social Conscious Against Rape and Sexual Assault—SCARS) and I
decided to write and publish my story of survival as a book. I knew then
that story had the power to make people think, empathise, and motivate
for social change. Across the many years it took me to write the book, I
would say when asked why I was writing the book, that many people
silently hold the trauma of rape and that the intimacy of reading another’s
story may offer some solidarity. There is much silence about rape: an invis-
ible lifelong injury to body, psyche, and relationships. In 1992, I was one
of the key speakers at the Sydney Reclaim the Night. I chose to share the
story of when I told my mother I had been raped. I stood on the side steps
of Sydney Town Hall facing a crowd of 5000 plus. The floodlights were
blinding. I couldn’t see faces to connect. I took myself back, narrating that
moment. The millenary audience held and heard my story and wept. The
book was published in 1994 (Phillips, 1994), with many media appear-
ances following. Responses to my storying told me that readers/ listeners
were affected. Lived stories catalyse empathy and social action.

Storying and Social Movements


In 2018, we defined ‘storying as the act of making and remaking meaning
through stories’, that ‘are alive and in constant fluidity as we story with
them’, constantly unfolding. We argued for ‘story as theory, as data, as
process, as text on the ethical grounds of accessibility and foregrounding
the marginalised’ (Phillips & Bunda, 2018, p. 7). For these qualities of
accessibility and voicing the margins and silenced, we see story and story-
ing hold an integral catalytic role in social movements.
1 STORYING: THE VITALITY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 5

For Aboriginal peoples, ‘stories are embodied acts of inter-textualised,


trans-generational law, and life spoken across and through time and place’
(p. 8). Social movements, in the lives of Aboriginal peoples have been and
continue to be, at once, out loud calls to community action that move to
harness collective senses of sovereignty and yet can also be subtle, quiet
gentle affirmations to individual spirits and bodies. There is in both, a
sense of being touched, never being the same again, transforming through
having been exposed to the movement.
In Louise speaking of being present at the 1988 protest march against
the white nation’s bicentennial celebration, I remember that I too was
present. As a young woman of 26, my activist pedigree was yet to be devel-
oped; however, I knew enough that I had to be in Sydney and participate.
A momentum was gathering, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
nations were activated from one end of the country to the other. You
could feel it in the air. We gathered and marched from Redfern; an inner
Sydney suburb known for having a large Aboriginal population to Hyde
Park in the city. This route was symbolic and purposeful. Other commu-
nity groups marched with us and banners were displayed in solidarity. The
Aboriginal flag could be seen flying from a tall building under construc-
tion. We chanted and cheered, caught up with family, and met new friends.
It felt euphoric, being part of a movement that was counted at approxi-
mately 50,000 people. This act of politicisation remade the meaning of
our being as one people, one cause, a history that would not be denied.
Two hundred years of white occupation paled in comparison to the mil-
lennia our peoples had lived and sustained our lands. For me, it was a
pivotal moment in my education, to stand with the mob, in unison for a
common cause. I would, from this time, continue to participate in pro-
tests. How could I not? My identity did not exist in a vacuum and the
struggle for our rights was righteous and remains so. Though political
protest on the street is infrequent to other forms of activism, this time was
foundational to the political and legal trek that we now march to resolve
the rightful place of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples through
treaty making as called for in the Uluru Statement from the Heart (2017).
As sociologist Francesca Polletta (2006) wrote in It was like a fever:
Storytelling in protest and politics, stories invite us to understand and feel
another’s perspective and empathise. We agree, we see that storying fore-
grounds bodies (sensation, emotions) and relationships. Polletta explains
that the stories that we tell ‘align our actions with our identities, often
subtly altering both. This is true of collective identities as well as individual
6 T. BUNDA AND L. G. PHILLIPS

ones. In telling the story of our becoming, as an individual, a nation, a


people, we define who we are’ (p. 12). We respond to stories, by identify-
ing with protagonists, feeling their fear and pain, and relief at their escape
and undeniable release of psychic energy with the arrival of resolution.
There needs to be some element of familiarity to identify with and relate
to, to be affected, as we imagine ourselves in their situation. For these
powerfully evocative reasons of identity-making and empathising, stories
in social movements can be strategically promoted ‘to strengthen a collec-
tive identity, but they also may precede and make possible the develop-
ment of a coherent community or collective actor’ (Polletta, 2006, p. 12).
Further, ‘stories make explicit the cultural schemas that underpin institu-
tional practices’ (Polletta, 2006, p. 13). That is, they offer details of con-
texts and social discourses of what is and isn’t accepted, welcomed, and
condoned across societal rules, routines, and rituals, to fully comprehend
the injustice at stake that the social movement acts for.
From the five principles we spoke of for storying in research, we see
they too hold resonance in storying social movements.

• Storying nourishes thought, body and soul—not always good and com-
forting, but rather nourishment that strengthens human integrity,
broadening worldly understandings of the plights of others, so we
empathise, question biases and injustices and are motivated to act.
• Storying claims voice in the silenced margins—to hear their lived reali-
ties. Social movements are propelled by stories from those who have
experienced the silenced injustice that the movement cam-
paigns against.
• Storying is embodied relational meaning-making—in that in hearing
stories of injustices, we feel their pain, and come to understand the
lived effect of the injustice, we come to know through hearts and
minds coalescing.
• Storying intersects the past and present as living oral archives—so that
audiences come to feel and understand the injustice/s in the now.
• Storying enacts collective ownership and authorship—of the move-
ment, in which individual and collective stories illustrate the collec-
tive movement.

Artist, activist, historian, Puerto Rican Elder, Aurora Levins Morales


too sees great wisdom in stories in activism, as she explains in her book
Medicine stories: Essays for radicals (2019) that stories ‘make that shift
1 STORYING: THE VITALITY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 7

happen, but the successful ones all begin with the particulars of people’s
lives and follow them down into our shared root systems’ (p. 42). Social
movements work with ‘stories that show resistance’; ‘expose the underpin-
nings of domination’; ‘crack open lies and make complacency intolerable’;
‘build trust, allow catharsis, honour grief, validate rage, offer unexpected
and heart-melting examples of solidarity and bestow courage’ (Morales,
2019, pp. 42–43). Stories in social movements are carefully crafted with
consideration as to, what is ‘the most effective way to change how people
around us think?’ (Morales, 2019, p. 46). Organisers in collaboration with
others identify the story to tell to provoke audiences to ‘see different pos-
sibilities and make new choices. Doing this well means listening more than
making speeches—really hearing the narratives people are living by’
(Morales, 2019, p. 45). Such deep listening and motivation to organise for
activism involves ‘analyzing, creating, and disseminating stories, and doing
so with courage, keenness, skill, and cunning, with the clear purpose of
changing human consciousness in the direction of choosing justice—this
is what organizing is all about’ (Morales, 2019, p. 46).
For these reasons, we see story and storying as key catalysts and actions
in social movements.

Movement as Activism
In storying social movements, we are locating with activist work of what is
referred to as new social movement theory, that arose from post-1960s
social movements, networked or ‘disorganized’ movements, and collective
identities creation, with roots and connections to feminist theory, anar-
chist studies, geographies of resistance, labour movement history, sexual-
ity studies, political elements of cultural studies, queer studies, postcolonial
theory, dance and music activist studies, and race and ethnicity studies (see
Jordan et al., 2002). We see that the real grit of scholarship in social move-
ments is forged by organisers, and so we have invited organisers creating
social change through story as the honourable authors for this edited col-
lection. In a true commitment to storying, this book brings to the fore,
the blood, sweat, and tears of the lived realities of social movements. The
stories told across the following six chapters breathe the “who-ness” of
peripheral peoples, highlighting their uniqueness as political agents’
(Forment, 1996, p. 314). As political philosopher Hannah Arendt
(1958/1998) proposed, we can only know who somebody is by knowing
the story in which she or he is the hero, that is in which they show the
8 T. BUNDA AND L. G. PHILLIPS

courage and ‘willingness to act and speak’, ‘to insert oneself into the
world’ (p. 186). The invited authors speak from experience of ‘willingness
to act and speak’ for and with peoples on the peripheries of dominant
society. They have demonstrated extraordinary wilfulness to create change
that has captured our attention and we feel deserve further attention
through publication in this book.
We see that central to the activism of social movements is wilfulness. As
feminist theorist Sara Ahmed (2014) traced feminist, queer, and antiracist
her/histories as being ‘those who are willing to be wilful’ (p. 134) citing
Alice Walker’s (2005) description of womanist as ‘outrageous, audacious,
courageous or wilful behaviour’ (p. xi) and Marilyn Frye’s (1992) descrip-
tion of radical feminism as ‘wilful creation of new meaning’ (p. 9) to name
a sample. Willing to be wilful. Wilfulness in ‘politics might involve not
only being willing to not go with the flow but be willing to cause its
obstruction’ (Frye, 1992, p. 161). A wilfulness to not be submerged in
the flow of dominant identities and ways of being, and to block those
flows through striking, as wilful bodies blocking traffic and economies. ‘A
history of wilfulness is a history of those who are willing to put their bod-
ies in the way, or to bend their bodies in the way of the will’ (Frye, 1992,
p. 161). As Rebecca Solnit (2003) writes, ‘Activism is not a journey to the
corner store; it is a plunge into the dark’. By this, Solnit (2003) is inferring
to the sensation of stepping into the unknown, of being wilful and straying
from or resisting the pack.
Collective identity is central to social movements and from a new social
movement position, particularly from a feminist and critical race theoreti-
cal position, we see collective identity as fundamentally political. The col-
lective identities of the social movements featured in this book we see as
‘fluid and relational’, involving acts of ‘perception and construction’
(Polletta & Jasper, 2001, p. 298). We recognise that this book fixes words
to pages at a point in time, but the words to define each social movement
will continue to be redefined according to circumstance, context, and
membership, ‘group definitions have no life of their own, and they are
constantly changing rather than static’ (Whittier, 1995, p. 15). ‘Any col-
lective identity developed in any movement must make space for a range
of standpoints, which may in turn be debated and contested as a part of
these processes’ (Maddison & Shaw, 2014, p. 418). Such is the liveliness
of the organic nature of social movements that stories can tell. No one
story can universally reveal the ‘who-ness’ of a social movement, but one
story can provoke an interest in the movement and an appetite for more.
1 STORYING: THE VITALITY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 9

We are uplifted by the Aboriginal women’s contributions in this book.


Aboriginal women writing of the political actions of other Aboriginal
women and of themselves articulate stories of struggle, challenge, and
liberation. Each draw on the tradition of Aboriginal women’s strength in
community, a tradition that is not dependent upon nor subservient to the
power exercised by Aboriginal brothers, fathers, uncles, etc. Within the
stories that are offered, there are being mapped, small but not inconse-
quential movements of resistance. Each story is imbued with a criticality
that affirms an Indigenous women’s standpoint (Moreton-Robinson,
2013) to acknowledge how colonising power is at play in the everyday.
These storying moments add to the larger historical storied collective of
Aboriginal protest and activism. Refusing to be assigned an assimilative
location as Randall, Davidson and Davidson have done in Chap. 4 or
refusing compliance with the white nation state imperative for mining as
the Kupa Piti Kungkas in Tur’s chapter (2) have done enacts a knowing
that a good is not a good for everyone (Simpson, 2014). In exposing that the
problematics of colonisation are unrelenting across time and characterised
by Australian contexts, the Aboriginal woman have moved to find real-life
solutions in decolonisation, emulating what Smith (2012) stipulates as the
necessary empowerment of Indigenous people to re-claim, re-name, re-­
write, and re-right. From point of contact, the Aboriginal decolonising
project has been to find social justice and peace through remembering old
ways, remembering the source of those knowledge systems, and the main-
tenance of those knowledges for translation to future generations.

Movement as the Stories Bodies Tell


Dance is literally the movement of social movements, the embodiment of
change and transformation. (Phillips-Fein, 2007, p. 422)

Dance contributes to social change, civic engagement, and activism in


multiple ways. As Diana Mills (2017) explains ‘At times the most dire and
seemingly hopeless situations give rise to novel and inventive ways of
mobilising the human body’ as ‘subjects who are deemed marginal in poli-
tics in and through verbal language find creative and inspiring ways to
show that they are never unequal to those who marginalise them’ (p. 12).
Think, for example, the Soweto gumboot dance that grew from the harsh
conditions of goldmine labouring in South Africa in the late nineteenth
century and the slapping of rhythms on gumboots became a keyway to
10 T. BUNDA AND L. G. PHILLIPS

communicate in the dark mine shafts (Dixon, 1998). And influential


New York choreographer, Martha Graham, known for her political dances
created across the twentieth century titled ‘Immigrant, Vision of
Apocalypse, Revolt, and Steps in the Street’ provoking social critiques
(Bannerman, 1999).
As Mills further explains ‘Dance enables its participants to unravel a
new world, offering new opportunities for its participants. Those oppor-
tunities may be inhibited in other political worlds they occupy’ (2017,
p. 18). The Soweto gold mine gumboot dances offered a means of com-
munication between Xhosa, Sothu, and Zulu labourers not understood by
white bosses. Dance can be used in many ways to challenge and change
the status quo, as political dance offers an ‘embodied language … inde-
pendent of words’ (Mills, 2017, p. 15). Marginalisation on the grounds of
race, sexuality, faith, and class can be equalised through dance, as dance
‘allows for the performance of equality of some subjects that may have
been deemed unequal in politics articulated in words’ (Mills, 2017,
p. 102). Alternative spaces for equality can be created through dance, as
Dabke has offered Palestinians in resistance to Israeli human rights abuses
against Palestinians (Rowe, 2010) and we see in Koori-ography for Koori
Australian dancers that Mariaa Randall describes in Chap. 4. Randall
makes clear that her dance intimately connects her to the stories of her old
people, ancestors who danced to story cultural traditions. A tradition that
existed for millennia and one which continues in her making of Koori-­
ography. A place from which she can dance into being new traditions, ones
that question why her own I-dentity (Raandall’s emphasis) has been ques-
tioned, to allow the dance to speak back. A revolutionary act of dance, a
revolutionary act to make less heavy widely held colonising social con-
structions of Aboriginal subjugations through assimilation. In Koori-­
ography she dances off this burden and is liberated through re-connecting
to family and community. ‘Dancing contributes to cultural continuity,
playing an important role in resisting colonialism, imperialism, and cul-
tural obliteration’ (Phillips-Fein, 2007, p. 420). Each culture has different
symbolic codes and motifs in movement, yet the human body is univer-
sally relatable, offering potential for community and cross-cultural under-
standing for another’s oppression.

The moving body relates to the moved body, whether or not political-legal
structures are in place to enable this relationship and sustain this relational-
ity. Those moments of shared empathy enable the recognition through the
1 STORYING: THE VITALITY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 11

body of the underly- ing assumption of the human rights doctrine: that all
human beings are equal in dignity. (Mills, 2017, pp. 114–115)

Storied Learning Through Social Movements


We see storying in social movements as pedagogical, and recognise that
extraordinary learning takes place through activism, which is explicitly
studied in social movement learning theory and espoused in Paulo Freire’s
(1974) concept of conscientization. Social movements are recognised as
highly fertile spaces for purposeful generation and distribution of knowl-
edge and social and structural change (Eyerman & Jamison, 1991).
Recognition of learning in social movements emerged from the 1990s and
has mostly been published by academics (Harley, 2014). What we are
most interested in is the unlearning of racist, patriarchal, and colonial log-
ics and the learning of new ways of relating, being, seeing, and doing that
social movements create (Webb, 2019) and storying makes sense by those
in the movements themselves.

Marginalized groups have historically played significant roles in social move-


ments. Yet, often due to the perception of that group as having no political
status, informal or formal, even social movement literature did not account
for the historic narratives of this involvement. (Rodgers, 2021, p. 96)

We also see critical race theory (CRT) as being well situated with learn-
ing through social movements. Critical Race Theory (CRT) developed
among African American scholars (Delgado & Stefancic, 2005) to make
visible the power of whiteness in the everyday experiences of being black.
This theoretical work has translatability in the Australian context given
that persistent colonial constructions of race permeate the formation of
relations between Aboriginal and white peoples. The translatability, how-
ever, differentiates at the point at which Aboriginal ontological relation-
ships are defined in country. Gloria Ladson-Billings (1998) has argued that,

CRT becomes an important intellectual and social tool for deconstruction,


reconstruction and construction: deconstruction of oppressive structures
and discourses, reconstruction of human agency and construction of equi-
table and socially just relations of power. (p. 9)
12 T. BUNDA AND L. G. PHILLIPS

CRT allows for understanding how race and racism are constructed and
embedded throughout societal institutions to create inequities. A key
component of CRT is found in the use of storytelling, for unmasking and
exposing racism, as an aspect of developing a CRT standpoint. The three
Aboriginal women’s stories included in this edition, read through the
CRT lens, are giving voice to their lived realities and for imagining other
ways of being. CRT has however been under attack with conservative
Australian Senator Pauline Hanson calling for the rejection of CRT from
the national curriculum (Anderson & Gatwiri, 2021). Her call follows the
US trend whereby 22 legislatures sought to ban CRT as a divisive element
in learning (Wong, 2021). Imagined senses that too much attention is
being paid to Aboriginal stories of colonisation, dispossession, and
Aboriginal truth-telling are the counter-stories that need to be heard, to
be moved from the margins to the centre.
Counter-storying in transformative critical pedagogy and critical educa-
tion studies has brought stories of gender, race, sexuality, and ability iden-
tity politics in social movements more into the public domain and in social
movement theory (understood as new social movements theory1). And
more recently intersectionality between domains of identity politics are
mobilised and researched, for which Terriquez (2015) offers the term
intersectional mobilization.
In the book, Children in Social Movements, Rodgers (2021) argues that
children have been a long-overlooked force in race, gender, sexuality, and
ability in social movements. Assumptions that children do not have ratio-
nal thought and agency have invisibilised their presence in political science
broadly (Bühler-Niederberger, 2010) and specific analyses of social move-
ments. Rodgers (2021) proposes that recognising children’s agency (as
does the sociology of childhood literature) and participation in social
movements enables greater understanding of the larger concept of agency
and social movements. Especially if social movements are recognised as
pedagogical through the collaborative, iterative, and dialogic processes as
Freire et al. described as ‘a pedagogy of desire’ (2007, p. 5), that is politi-
cal desire and dreams and an education of longing in a Pedagogy of Heart
(1997). Social movements desire and long for social change. Pedagogues
in social movements convoke radical imagination (Webb, 2019). Storying
of lived activism and imagined futures can do that. Recent works
published by Australian activists Sally Rugg (How powerful we are, 2019

1
Earlier social movements theory was largely class-based and framed by Marxism.
1 STORYING: THE VITALITY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 13

on the marriage equality campaign) and Jean Hinccliffe (Lead the way,
2021 on School Strikes 4 Climate movement) were written to document
and share their activism learning in making systemic change happen.

Overview of Chapters
We are all women as authors brought together in this book. We recognise
that women across the world, across history have and continue to be mar-
ginalised and silenced. Though none of the chapters are specifically on
women’s issues, the thread of recognition of women’s lived realities is
present through our authorship as women of across ages, black, white,
Jewish, and Cypriot migrant heritage. Across the time of curating this
edited collection, we have come to know these authors’ extraordinary pas-
sion, advocacy, and activism deeply and respectfully. We graciously honour
the stories they have shared. They are gifts that we think and know with,
in which ‘relations of thinking and knowing require care’ (Puig de la
Bellacasa, 2012, p. 198). We care for the authors, their stories, and the
movements they tell. We care that these stories are heard, so that more
empathise with the causes, and those who are affected by the injustices
build strength from knowing they are not alone.
In Chap. 2, Simone Tur, activist and academic, tells of the Irati Wanti
anti-nuclear campaign, a remembering of the fight to maintain sover-
eignty, to sustain Country as the specified tracts of land that determine
connection and identity, and to fight for Aboriginal people’s rights. The
Irati Wanti Anti-Nuclear Campaign is an important story that cannot be
left to linger unknown and unheard particularly when the world is so chal-
lenged by environmental and political instability. Here is an example of
Senior Aboriginal women fighting to protect Country for the spiritual
essence it provides in protecting stories. These Senior Aboriginal women
stand up in Country, as sovereign Aboriginal women do to speak against
uranium mining and political and economic indifference to the
consequences.
In Chap. 3, Ella Simons, youth climate change activist stories how her
location and ancestry shaped her commitment to the climate justice move-
ment from her late primary school years. Her story is a story of becoming
an activist, organiser, and media spokesperson, as a child and school stu-
dent with reduced access to civic institutions and independence.
In Chap. 4, Mariaa Randall, Kooriographer/choreographer, fore-
grounds embodied Aboriginal knowledges as the foundation for
14 T. BUNDA AND L. G. PHILLIPS

movement as activism. Through storied dance (Kooriography), Mariaa


tells of the losses and disconnections inflicted by British possession and
massacres on I-dentity (a fine line of uncertainty) in Aboriginal Australian
people’s identities in contemporary contexts. We feel the intimacy of
movement in Mariaa’s embodied storying as a Koori woman for Aboriginal
women treading the tightrope between two worlds.
In Chap. 5, Alice Owen, disability rights activist and dance and speech
therapist, stories with The Brotherhood of the Wordless, a group of cre-
ative writers with physical disabilities including the inability to use oral
speech to communicate. Through poetry crafted with individualised assis-
tance to communicate via typing, The Brotherhood tells of life in disabled
bodies. With the process of creative writing and assisted typing,
Brotherhood members have at last been recognised as people with some-
thing to say. Their movement into and with the Arts world (as opposed to
the pathologised Disabled world) welcomes and applauds their talents, so
that they finally feel valued and enabled to advocate individually and as a
group for changes in the way the Disabled world operates.
In Chap. 6, Lily and Maria Davidson orate their lives and the influences
of their activist parents for their own activism to help others disenfran-
chised with the community. As sisters, their activism for assisting members
of the community to reconnect, wade through struggle, and reconcile
long-held pain are the storied attempts to allow individuals, families, and
communities a vestige of wellness and to find strength. We stand with the
sisters and bring their stories from the margins to the centre to give voice
to the healing effects of the gentleness and care in their movements.
In Chap. 7, Agli Zavros-Orr, inter-sex human rights activist, autoeth-
nographically stories through journaling, visual re-presentations, and
poetry their individuated sensibility for and with an ethic of just-care. Their
authorial voice unashamedly talks back at the western, patriarchal socio-­
political-­medico landscape their lived realities of being intersex intertwined
with their intersex human rights work. Agli offers a generative reflexively
meditative response of inward and outward movement through entangled
thinking, feeling, and doing inviting rethinking of ethics and hupomne-
maticing (artful self-journaling).
Each chapter contributes thinking, knowing, and being about story
and movement. Relationships with the authors show momentum in col-
lective movements affirming direction. As we did in Research Through,
With and as Storying (2018), we two have gathered. We have called upon
our friends, colleagues, and acquaintances to contribute stories to this
1 STORYING: THE VITALITY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 15

edited collection. The authors story their movement. In respect of their


work and writing and as we have done for each other in our first co-­
authored book, we respond at the end of each chapter, with the authors
we worked closest with, forming a new ‘together’ with the individual
authors and sustaining theoretical threads through the book. In taking up
this practise again, we give thanks to the authors, ensuring that their
movement from the margin to the centre is seen and known but moreover
is the Indigenous relational practice of reciprocity—for that which has
been given, then something of equal value is given back. Balance is found.
We stand together.

References
Ahmed, S. (2014). Willful subjects. Duke University Press.
Anderson, L., & Gatwiri, K. (2021, June 22). The Senate has Voted to Reject
Critical race Theory from the National Curriculum. The Conversation. https://
theconversation.com/the-­s enate-­h as-­v oted-­t o-­r eject-­c ritical-­r ace-­t heory-­
from-­the-­national-­curriculum-­what-­is-­it-­and-­why-­does-­it-­matter-­163102
Arendt, H. (1958/1998). The human condition (2nd ed.). The University of
Chicago Press.
Bannerman, H. (1999). An overview of the development of Martha Graham's
movement system (1926–1991). Dance Research: The Journal of the Society for
Dance Research, 17(2), 9–46.
Bühler-Niederberger, D. (2010). Introduction: Childhood sociology—Defining
the state of the art and ensuring reflection. Current Sociology, 58(2), 155–164.
Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (Eds.). (2005). The Derrick Bell Reader. NYU Press.
Dixon, N. (1998, December 2). Behind the gumboot dance. Green left. (343).
https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/behind-­gumboot-­dance
Eyerman, R., & Jamison, E. (1991). Social movements: A cognitive approach.
Pennsylvania State University Press.
Forment, C. A. (1996). Peripheral peoples and narrative identities: Arendtian
reflections on late modernity. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference:
Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 314–330). Princeton University
Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1nxcvsv.
Freire, P. (1974). Education for critical consciousness. Sheed & Ward.
Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogy of the Heart. Continuum. ISBN 0-8264-1039-1.
Freire, P., Macedo, D., & Freire, A. M. A. (2007). Daring to Dream: Toward a
Pedagogy of the Unfinished (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/
9781315635309
Frye, M. (1992). Willful virgin: Essays in feminism, 1976–1992. Crossing Press.
16 T. BUNDA AND L. G. PHILLIPS

Harley, A. (2014). Social movement learning. In D. Coghlan & M. Brydon-Miller


(Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of action research (pp. 715–716). Sage
Publications.
Jordan, T., Lent, A., MacKay, G., & Mische, A. (2002). Social movement studies:
Opening statement. Social Movement Studies, 1(1), 5–6. https://doi.
org/10.1080/14742830120118864
Ladson-Billings, G. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what's it doing in
a nice field like education? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in
Education, 11(1), 7–24.
Maddison, S., & Shaw, F. (2014). Feminist perspectives on social movement
research. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), Handbook of feminist research: Theory and
praxis (pp. 413–433). Sage Publications.
Mills, D. (2017). Dance and politics moving beyond boundaries. Manchester
University Press.
Morales, A. L. (2019). Medicine stories: Essays for radicals. Duke University Press.
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2013). Towards an Australian indigenous Women's
standpoint theory. Australian Feminist Studies, 28(78), 331–347.
Phillips, L. (1994). Moving on: A journey through sexual assault. Sally Milner
Publishing.
Phillips, L. G., & Bunda, T. (2018). Research through, with and as storying.
Routledge.
Phillips-Fein, J. (2007). Dance and activism. In G. L. Anderson & K. G. Kerr
(Eds.), Encyclopaedia of activism and social justice (pp. 420–422). SAGE.
Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever: Storytelling in protest and politics. University
of Chicago Press.
Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements.
Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.
soc.27.1.283
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2012). ‘Nothing comes without its world’: Thinking
with care. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 197–216.
Rodgers, D. M. (2021). Children in social movement: Rethinking agency, mobili-
zation and rights. Routledge advances in sociology. Routledge.
Rowe, N. (2010). Raising dust: A cultural history of dance in Palestine. Tauris.
Simpson, A. (2014). Mohawk Interruptus. Duke University Press.
Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples
(2nd ed.). Zed Books.
Solnit, R. (2003). Tomgram: Rebecca Solnit on hope in dark times. [Web log post].
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/677/rebecca_solnit_on_hope_
in_dark_times
Terriquez, V. (2015). Intersectional mobilization, social movement spillover, and
queer youth leadership in the immigrant rights movement. Social Problems,
62(3), 343–362.
1 STORYING: THE VITALITY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 17

The Uluru Statement from the Heart. (2017). https://ulurustatement.org/


the-­statement/
Walker, A. (2005). In search of our mothers’ gardens. Phoenix.
Webb, D. (2019). Prefigurative politics, utopian desire and social movement learn-
ing: Reflections on the pedagogical lacunae in Occupy Wall street. Journal for
Critical Education Policy Studies, 17(2), 204–245.
Whittier, N. (1995). Feminist generations: The persistence of the radical women's
movement. Temple University Press.
Wong, J. C. (2021, July 1). The ACLU on fighting critical race theory bans: It’s
about our country reckoning with racism. The Guardian. https://www.the-
guardian.com/us-­n ews/2021/jul/01/aclu-­f ights-­s tate-­b ans-­t eaching-
­critical-­race-­theory
CHAPTER 2

Learning with Kupa Piti Kungka


Tjuta Activism

Simone Tur

Abstract Indigenous activism within Australia has a long history since


colonisation and is inclusive of the fight for land rights, native title, and
more recently constitutional recognition for Indigenous peoples through
the delivery of the Uluru Statement of the Heart. The Irati Wanti Anti-­
Nuclear Campaign is such an example of Senior Aboriginal women fight-
ing to protect Country as a sovereign right. This chapter is an honouring
of the fight taken up by the senior Kungkas (Aboriginal women) to the
then Federal government’s proposal to build a radioactive waste reposi-
tory on Country in South Australia. The Kungkas, to whom Simone has
kin connection, knew well of the impacts of nuclear testing which the
British exercised in South Australia in the 1950s. The Campaign brought
into sharp relief the differing value systems afforded to the desert—for one
a site for dumping and for the other, the site of home. This is the story of
the Kungkas’ resistance told by one who is kin of the younger generation

S. Tur (*)
Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
e-mail: simone.tur@flinders.edu.au

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature 19


Switzerland AG 2023
L. G. Phillips, T. Bunda (eds.), Storying Social Movement/s, Palgrave
Studies in Movement across Education, the Arts and the Social
Sciences, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09667-9_2
20 S. TUR

and who as an educator thinks deeply on her senior women’s actions to


inform the contemporary movement to decolonise.

Keywords Anangu • Irati wanti • Indigenous sovereignty • Kungka


• Silent activism • Activist

Cultural Warning: References are made to members of my community


who have passed away. Out of cultural respect, when I refer to family and
community members who have passed away, I will use the cultural term
Kunmanara.

Locating Self in Social Movement


I am the embodiment of Anangu1 Aboriginal person. Since birth I have
maintained my connection to Country and community—I have enacted
my responsibility and connection. I am same and different. My story is
embedded in my family’s story.
This story was sung into being. Singing is important to me—it is a key
medium for how I communicate as an Indigenous person, community
member, learner and teacher, activist, and performer. In a sense, singing is
a way of ‘being’ for myself and my community. The act of singing con-
nects me to Country through my Elders and family. It is a sensory and
literal embodied experience. Singing resonates. It allows me to say some-
thing important and also to feel Anangu ways of knowing from long ago
to the contemporary, in my body.Song and singing are like narrative part-
ners. They allow crucial and thoughtful ways of transmitting ideas of
being, in this case from the perspective of an Anangu Woman—grounded
in the teachings of Elders and Knowledge Holders within my community.
I see teaching as performative (hooks, 1991, 1994) and singing is an
important performative element in how I teach. Singing is central to my
professional experience in public performance in theatre and collective
creative work with colleagues.

1
Person in Yankunytjatjara language.
2 LEARNING WITH KUPA PITI KUNGKA TJUTA ACTIVISM 21

Irati Wanti2—Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta3


The poison, leave it
‘We Said NO straight away’
1998: The federal government announced a plan to build a national
radioactive waste dump in South Australia. Identified site Billa Kalina region,
central north South Australia. (Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown,
2005, p. 10)

Indigenous activism within Australia is associated with the fight for rec-
ognition of Indigenous people’s rights, connection to Country, and sov-
ereignty. The Irati Wanti Anti-Nuclear Campaign is such an example of
Senior Aboriginal women fighting to protect their Country as a sovereign
right. The following story reflects these struggles and successes and
addresses questions of: What does it mean to become knowledgeable from
an Anangu woman’s community standpoint, and does activism inform
Indigenous decolonising praxis? In this chapter, I acknowledge the Kupa
Piti Kungka Tjuta and particularly my Senior Knowledge Holders, many
of whom have now passed away: Kunmanara Crombie, Kunmanara
Brown, Kunmanara Watson, Kunmanara Wonga, Kunmanara Stuart,
and members who are still campaigning, Ngunytju4 Emily Munyungka
Austin and Kami5 Lallie Lennon. I also acknowledge all the Kungkas6 and
their activism who have passed and those who continue to protect their
Country: my late Mother Mona Ngitji Ngitji Tur, Kamuru Lester, Kami
Lucy Lester, Rose Lester and Karina Lester, and the Yankunytjatjara
Native Title Corporation. I also acknowledge Umoona Aged Care at
Coober Pedy for their ongoing support in my research when I spent time
with my Waltjapiti7 at the aged care centre.

We are the Aboriginal women. Yankunytjatjara, Antikarinya and Kokatha …


We know the Country. (Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown, 2005, p. 12)

2
The poison, leave it in Yankunytjatjara language
3
The Many Women from Coober Pedy in Yankunytjatjara language
4
Mother in Yankunytjatjara language.
5
Grandmother, great aunt in Yankunytjatjara language.
6
Women in Yankunytjatjara language.
7
Extended or full family, groups, or gathering of relations in Yankunytjatjara language.
22 S. TUR

Learning by Example
This chapter follows in the footsteps of the Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta, Irati
Wanti campaign, and the Senior Anangu Women’s activism. I critically
reflect on the significance of inter-generational transmission of knowledge
activism as part of an Embodied Activist Pedagogy. I discuss how the
ontology of Ngapartji-Ngapartj8 grounded my participation in The
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission authorized by the South Australian
Government in 2016, as a responsibility within my community context,
which honoured the teaching of the Senior Women and their campaign.
What follows is a collective story: words embedded with memories, and
knowledge past and present which is ethical—as it should be—and embod-
ied in my telling, through word and action. This story is not possible
without the knowledge, guidance wisdom and activism of those acknowl-
edges above and the many others who share and contribute their stories.

Activism and Embodied Pedagogy: Theory, Protocol,


and Priority

In Breaking the Boundaries: Australian Activists Tell Their Stories, Allen


and Noble (2016, p. 1) ask, ‘What makes an activist?’ This is an important
question. It is a question connected to practices of transformation and
connects to Aboriginal activism, which, I argue, can provide critical
insights into what it means to be Indigenous and especially an engaged
Indigenous academic in contemporary Australian education. This chapter
considers and supports the proposition that scholarly activism contributes
to necessary knowledge production from an Indigenous perspective.
Allen and Noble (2016) describe the qualities which underpin activism.
These include ‘thoughtfulness, courage and creativity, all underpinned by
the values and beliefs of social justice, human rights and sustainability’
(p. 1). What is common amongst all activists, say Allen and Noble, is the
commitment for change:

We want to encourage people to do something when they see a need for


change. The first step is often the hardest; but ordinary people can do
extraordinary things, and working together we can make a difference. (p. 3)

8
Mutual Reciprocation; In return; later I’ll give you something in return, give and give-in-
return in Yankunytjatjara language.
2 LEARNING WITH KUPA PITI KUNGKA TJUTA ACTIVISM 23

These features and the overall purpose outlined here are certainly true,
but Indigenous activism requires one step more.
Allen and Noble’s descriptions of activism are a beneficial reference
point in analysing the Irati Wanti campaign. However, for Indigenous
activists within their Country, I would argue that sovereignty through
connection to and ‘caring as Country’ (Rigney & Hemming, 2014) is a
critical characteristic to add to their definitions. Aboriginal accounts of
activism as ‘Indigenous sovereign acts’ performed as part of complex and
obligatory caring practices within Australia are important to the broader
intellectual contribution made by Indigenous people to civil discourse.
Allen and Noble (2016) and Ollis (2012) offer beneficial critiques; how-
ever, analysis of activism through ‘race’, racialisation, and white race privi-
lege within Australia (Moreton-Robinson, 2000; Nicoll, 2007;
Tannoch-Bland, 1998)—as identified discourses of social justice and
human rights critique—is needed to understand activism as necessary
Indigenous sovereign practice. Its connection to the concept of caring ‘as’
Country takes readings of activism into what has been referred to else-
where as Black space.
The Irati Wanti campaign, for example, has contributed to bridging
the gap between generic activist practices and methods and Indigenous-­
specific activist objectives of putting First Peoples first. In doing so, it has
been influential statewide, nationally, and internationally in shaping the
expression and what I call the ‘performance’ of public policy—in this case,
around the disposal of nuclear waste as a matter of infringement of Anangu
and therefore Indigenous sovereignty.
The Irati Wanti campaign is about human rights globally, uranium
mining, and nuclear waste storage, beginning from the position of ‘locat-
edness’ and extending its influence beyond one, to many, locations. This
is at once a local and an international matter. In the Kupa Piti Kungka
Tjuta resistance, they show that the local must meet global world issues in
relation to nuclear energy, mining, and storage. Whether through ‘silent’
activism, protests, public discourse on injustices, film, or creative praxis
activism, such ‘acts’ are always political. Performing activism is not with-
out its risks, or its losses, but activism can change lives and be life-­changing.
The Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta demonstrate this grounded commitment to
their community and their conceptualisation of nation and nations. In the
Kungkas’ words: We lost our friends. Never mind we lost our loved ones.
We never give up. Been through too much. Too much hard business and
still we keep going. Sorry business all the time. Fought through every hard
24 S. TUR

thing along the way. People trying to scare us from fighting, it was hard
work, but we never stopped. When we were going to Sydney, people say,
“You Kungkas cranky, they might bomb you”, but we kept going (Kupa
Piti Kungka Tjuṯa, 2005, p. 116).
A group of Senior Aboriginal Women can make a change. Here is their
story: it is the act of raising awareness as a sovereign, located, embodied,
and ‘performed’ activist pedagogy.

Raising Public Awareness and Focusing Attention by


Speaking Out Strong
In 1998 the Australian Federal Government, under Prime Minister John
Howard, announced the ‘plan to build a national radioactive dump waste
dump in South Australia’ (Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown, 2005, p. 10).
The proposed location was Billa Kalina which spans:

most of central-north South Australia … [and] includes the Woomera


Prohibited Area, the townships of Roxby Downs, Andamooka and Woomera,
and an extensive network of salt lakes. The region is very close to the Great
Artesian Basin and Coober Pedy.

From the start of the announcement, the Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta said
‘NO’. Irati Wanti—‘The poison, leave it’. This was grounded in the
Senior Women’s knowledge and responsibility to and ‘as’ Country and a
result of direct family effects from the Maralinga atomic bomb tests
(1950–1960s) (Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown, 2005, p. 78) on their
waltjapiti (family), Country, physical and spiritual well-being. The
Kungkas spoke out and did not stop telling their stories. They said:

We take our responsibilities very seriously toward: the land, the Country,
some of the special places, we know them the Tjukur9—the important sto-
ries of the land the songs that prove how the land is the Inma-song and
dance of the culture, all part of the land as well the bush tucker that we
know and do our best to teach the grandchildren, and even tourists when we
have the chance preserving the traditional crafts; the wira- wooden bowl,
wana-digging stick, punu-music sticks, and even kali-boomerang, that our
grandmothers have passed down to us through generations the language the

9
Story, Dreaming in Yankunytjatjara language.
2 LEARNING WITH KUPA PITI KUNGKA TJUTA ACTIVISM 25

family, that members have respect for one another. ‘All this is law’. (Kupa
Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown, 2005, p. 6)

These strong words, almost like a manifesto, make clear to the listener
the responsibility and deep knowledge of Country, and the importance of
inter-generational knowledge transmission as ‘embodied’ and enacted
sovereignty.
Audre Lorde (1980) says:

I have come to believe over and over again that what is most important to
me must be spoken, made verbal and shared, even at the risk of having it
bruised or misunderstood. That the speaking profits me, beyond any
other effect.

The Kungkas understood this and knew the importance of making


their worries about uranium known to the world: ‘We bring our worry, the
waste dump, here for support’ (Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown, 2005,
p. 72), they said. It was not a time to be silent. It was a time to be strong
and strategic. The connection of ‘worry’ and ‘support’ is important. The
Kungkas wanted change, but they needed allies to open Anangu histories
and logic.
As Vincent (2007a) too reflected on the Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta’s
activism and cultural responsibility acknowledging the strategic approach
the Senior Women undertook to fight the federal and South Australian
governments and that never faltered in what I would call ‘Aboriginal
women’s sovereign standpoint position’ (Moreton-Robinson, 2013) in
relation to the proposed sites. Vincent saw that the sharing of ‘counter-­
narratives’ transcended ‘cultural boundaries’. I agree with this and con-
sider the Kungkas’ activism was grounded in humanity as a struggle that
was not only important for Anangu but for all Australians.

The Kungka Tjuta did not accept they were powerless to change the course
of the waste repository project ‘the government’ planned to impose on
them. Talking and travelling became methods of articulating counter-­
narratives, which radically disrupted the federal government’s unconvincing
story. The counter-narratives resonated with many non-Indigenous
Australians and forced an epistemological contest between different ways of
knowing the Country. (Vincent, 2007b, p. 164)
26 S. TUR

Articulating the Counter-narrative: Inma


The Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta didn’t just tell their story, they sang their
story through inma, at public meetings such as the Australian Conservation
Foundation at the Adelaide Town Hall and Olympic Dam in 1999 (Kupa
Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown, 2005, p. 22). The Inma words demonstrate
knowledge and understanding of Country and the responsibility to leave
uranium in the ground: ‘Eileen Brown and Lucy Wilton sing Inma.
“That’s exactly what the song says; I left it [irati-poison] in the ground,
you leave it in the ground”’ (Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown, 2005,
p. 25). My Kangkuru, Karina Lester explains for Kunmanara Brown her
grandmother, the significance of Inma: ‘They know singing for the land
and doing the dance for the land is healing the land’ (Kupa Piti Kungka
Tjuṯa & Brown, 2005, p. 86).
The Kungkas took their message online through the development of
the Irati Wanti website and short documentary ‘Irati Wanti’ (Kupa Piti
Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown, 2005, pp. 39–40), with the support of key peo-
ple, as part of their campaign of raising public awareness about their fight
against the government. These were just some of their initiatives to get
their message into the public domain. The Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta also
connected with other Aboriginal communities in Australia who were hav-
ing to deal with the prospects of uranium exploration within their Country.
The following letter shares their concern and support:

Dear Jawoyn People, Hello. We are the Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta. We are the
Senior Aboriginal Cultural Women in Coober Pedy, South Australia. We are
dropping you a line to let you know about our struggle against the uranium
and how we are standing up strong for our Country. We are writing to let
you know that uranium is dangerous and not to give them the right of way.
(Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown, 2005, p. 44)

From International peace walks (Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown,
2005, p. 98) and road trips, to festivals, postcards, and posters, to letters
to politicians, the Kungkas were ‘talking straight out’: ‘initiating or join-
ing action groups, protests, boycotts and campaigns to bring about
change’ (Allen & Noble, 2016, p. 2).
Echoing Vincent’s (2007a) words, the Kungka Tjuta weren’t power-
less. In fact, the Kungkas became strategic lobbyists who formed many
important relationships, connections, and networks with communities of
2 LEARNING WITH KUPA PITI KUNGKA TJUTA ACTIVISM 27

like-minded individuals and groups who held and supported their perspec-
tive on caring for Country and anti-nuclear philosophy and action. The
Kungkas understood the importance of collective views. The Kungkas
called on Sister Michele Madigan to support the administration of the
Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta as an incorporated body (Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuṯa
& Brown, 2005, p. 6). They were able to voice and promote their con-
cerns to local politicians (such as the ‘greenies’ as the Kungkas called
them) and organisations such as Friends of the Earth (p. 16). They spoke
at public events and conferences, such as the 1998 Global Survival and
Indigenous Rights conference in Melbourne and, following this confer-
ence, formed a strong alliance with a group of ‘young non-Aboriginal
women’ from whom the Kungkas sought support. They came to be known
as the ‘Melbourne Kungkas’ (Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown,
2005, p. 20).
The outcome of the Irati Wanti campaign was successful. In July 2004,
the government abandoned its plans, and this resulted in legislation being
introduced in South Australia to prohibit the construction, operation, and
importation of nuclear facilities, storage, and waste. The Irati Wanti cam-
paign was fundamentally about Indigenous and human rights, and politi-
cians and the public recognised that (Allen & Noble, 2016, p. 2). The
success of the Irati Wanti campaign led to changes in state legislation.
Sections from the South Australian Nuclear Waste Storage Facility
(Prohibition) Act 2000, Acts 8, 9, and 13 of the legislation listed below
show this:

8—Prohibition against construction or operation of nuclear waste storage


facility;9—Prohibition against importation or transportation of nuclear
waste for delivery to nuclear waste storage facility;13—No public money to
be used to encourage or finance construction or operation of nuclear waste
storage facility. (Government of South Australia, 2000, p. 3)

Media reported the government’s new legislation after the Federal


Court ruling of 2004:

[T]he federal government abandoned the plan to build a radioactive dump


in SA. The decision reflected the strength and persistence of the campaign
against the dump. The victory was also helped by the ruling of the full bench
of the Federal Court in June 2004 that the government had illegally used
28 S. TUR

the urgency provision of the Land Acquisition Act. (Australian Map of


Nuclear and Uranium Sites, 2017)

The Kungkas’ response expressed the truth: ‘We are winners because of
what’s in our hearts’ (Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuṯa & Brown, 2005, p. 12).

Activism, Embodiment, and Healing


I joined the campaign and was mentored by members of the Kungkas. I
was privileged to attend some of the campaign events including at the
Adelaide Town Hall and an afternoon tea at the South Australian
Parliament House with members of the Labor, Liberal and Democrat par-
ties. I acknowledge my kinship relationships with the Kungkas and their
teachings which shape me today. Kinship is important to activism—but it
means different things in different contexts.
As an Indigenous person, I grew up understanding the importance of
survival, resistance, and activism in response to ‘race’ relations in Australia,
imposed policies of Protection and Assimilation and land rights. These
were and continue to be part of the ‘Indigenous everyday’. I may have not
always understood the significance of these experiences; however with age,
family and professional experience, community grounding, and also
through profound loss, coming to understand and voice the story of these
experiences has become part of my ‘being’, my pedagogy (drawn from
ontology) and standpoint. Aboriginal people understand the complex
relationship with the state and its underpinning institutions and pervasive,
often oppressive cultural practices. Lifelong activism and resistance are
therefore relevant to the lives and education of Indigenous people and
their communities, locally, nationally, and internationally. They are ways of
survival. In this respect, they are affirmation practices.
I see activism or resistance for many Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander people as part of the everyday within racialised societies in
Australia: an unavoidable way of being in the world. If it is part of the
everyday, then healing is necessary. Telling your story and talking straight
out become healing acts of activism.
Indigenous Australian activism and resistance in relation to Indigenous
land rights and sovereignty, in the context of the dispossession of Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander people and the ‘white possessive logic’ (Moreton-­
Robinson, 2015) within settler-colonial Australia, is necessary—for those
2 LEARNING WITH KUPA PITI KUNGKA TJUTA ACTIVISM 29

who are oppressed, but also for those for whom hegemony has been
‘naturalised’.
The Irati Wanti campaign demonstrates the lived, inter-generational
experience of that necessity: that knowledge of and being in Country are
important; that nuclear waste storage is unhealthy; that harming the
manta 10 means that ‘our’ ancestral, spiritual, and physical well-being is
affected; that telling your story is important in the praxis of activism; that
an Indigenous Embodied Activist Pedagogy does offer counter-­knowledges
(through counter-narratives) to those preferred by dominant systems.

Enactment, ‘Situatedness’, and ‘Really


Useful Knowledge’
My experience with the Kungkas and Irati Wanti has taught me what this
‘politics of radiation’ might be. It involves the ‘radiation’ of ‘charged’
ideas fuelled by motivations for change and transformation discussed so
far—focused emotion, embodied presence, speaking position, gender,
situationality, and locatedness—alongside considered and well-theorised
anti-racist discourse and an understanding of the complexities and particu-
larities of Indigenous epistemologies in relation to kinship groups, com-
munity, and Country. Further analysis of activism and Indigenous
resistance needs to be understood from these multiple perspectives, but
the Irati Wanti experience provides a real-world example of inter-­
generational effective and affective resistance from which to work and on
which to build.
I do see distinctions and nuances between meanings of activism and
resistance within Indigenous Australia arising from and based on a spec-
trum of relationships between the colonised and the coloniser. For many
Indigenous peoples—and this is reflected within my own family, personal
and community stories—resistance to colonialism is more than ‘just a way
of life’, as described by Ollis in her characterisation of a ‘lifelong activist’
(Ollis, 2012, p. 57). Activism from an Indigenous perspective needs to be
understood through inter-generational, resistive, assertive, sovereign
responses to colonialism and dispossession of Indigenous peoples from
our lands in general and in particular. We never have ceded our connec-
tion to Country, sky, and waters. I consider that resistance, as a general
and Country-specific practice, informs activism as a significant
10
Earth in in Yankunytjatjara language.
30 S. TUR

characteristic when constructing an Indigenous Embodied Pedagogy,


from a lived as well as theorised decolonising foundation of ‘race’ and
racialisation.

Activism, Embodiment, and Inter-Generational


Practice: The Royal Commission, 2015
The need to talk strong continues, both for the Senior Women and for my
generation. In February 2015, the South Australian Government
announced a Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission to investigate the
‘Exploration, Extraction and Milling, Further Processing and Manufacture,
Electricity Generation, and Management, Storage and Disposal of Waste’
(Government of South Australia, 2015).
In the same year, a public exhibition was held at the Adelaide Festival
Centre honouring and remembering Maralinga atomic bomb tests and the
Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta, Irati Wanti campaign, titled Talking Straight
Out: Images and Insights from the Campaign that Stopped South Australia
from Becoming a Nuclear Waste Dump.
The women sent out their message:

Dear Friend of the Irati Wanti campaign,


Emily Munyungka Austin, Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta, and Karina Lester,
granddaughter of Eileen Kampakuta Brown, invite you to attend a spe-
cial event:
October 15, 2015, marks 62 years since the first atomic bomb test at Emu
Junction, South Australia. The Kungka Tjuta remember, “All of us were liv-
ing when the Government used the Country for the bomb. Everybody got sick …
They thought they knew what they were doing then …” In February 1998 the
federal government announced its plan to build a national radioactive waste
dump in the South Australian desert. In March a council of senior Aboriginal
women from Coober Pedy, the Kupa Piti Kungka Tjuta, made an announce-
ment of their own. “We say no radioactive waste dump in our ngura—in our
Country”.
For six years the women travelled the Country, talking straight out. They
called their campaign Irati Wanti. “We all say enough is enough. Irati wanti—
the poison leave it”.
They explained, they demanded, they marched and sang. They told of
extraordinary personal histories. They worked with greenies and wrote pas-
sionate letters to politicians.
They won.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in
such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make


any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project


Gutenberg™ electronic works
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed


editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™,


including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how
to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

You might also like