Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ensayo Argumentativo Escritura Academica
Ensayo Argumentativo Escritura Academica
Posición: A favor.
Argumento #1: Mal uso del elemento Uranio.
Argumento #2: Las armas nucleares causan daños catastróficos.
Argumento #3: Las armas nucleares son las únicas armas de destrucción masiva que
aún no han sido (realmente) prohibidas.
Fuentes y Citas:
1. Siracusa, J. (2008). Nuclear Weapons: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford
University Press.
https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezbiblio.usfq.edu.ec/lib/usfq/reader.action?
pq-origsite=primo&ppg=18&docID=415598
“Nuclear explosions are also accompanied by radioactive fallout, lasting a few seconds,
and remaining dangerous over an extended period of time, potentially lasting years. The
release of radiation is, in fact, unique to nuclear explosions.” (Siracusa, J., 2008, p.21)
2. Stimson, H. (2017). The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb. Great Neck
Publishing.
https://web-p-ebscohost-com.ezbiblio.usfq.edu.ec/ehost/detail/detail?
vid=4&sid=816bf640-8782-427a-aaed-6bcc96f6bd6f
%40redis&bdata=Jmxhbmc9ZXMmc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1saXZl#db=a9h&AN=212
12319
As a result, it is indicated that the future may see a time when such a weapon may
be constructed in secret and used suddenly and effectively with devastating power
by a willful nation or group against an unsuspecting nation or group of much greater
size and material power. With its aid even a very powerful unsuspecting nation
might be conquered within a very few days by a very much smaller one. (Stimson,
H., 2017, pp.22)
4. McKinney, Sagan & Weiner. (2020) why the atomic bombing of Hiroshima
would be illegal today. Bulletin of the atomic scientists, Vol.76 (4), p.157-165).
https://web-p-ebscohost-com.ezbiblio.usfq.edu.ec/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?
vid=0&sid=2fea26df-9c6a-4c7b-823a-4cbe5f2d1ddf%40redis
“A nuclear strike against a legitimate military target could be legal only if it met all
three criteria: no intentional targeting of civilians, absence of disproportionate collateral
damage, and with all feasible precautions made to reduce collateral damage.”
(McKinney, et al., 2020, pp.10)