Executive Summary

A. Project Title : Establishment of Double “A” Slaughterhouse

B. Project Location : Purok 1, New Visayas, Montevista, Davao de Oro
C. Project Category : New Construction
D. Project Scale/Dimension : _____________
E. Project Proponent : Municipal Government of Montevista
F. Implementing Unit : Municipal Government of Montevista
G. No. of Barangays Covered by the SP. : 20 Barangays
H. Mode of Implementation : By Contract
I. Operational Management : MLGU
J. Project Beneficiaries
Direct :

K. Total Project Cost and :P 27,079,129.46

Cost Sharing WB :P 21,663,303.57
GoP :P 2,707,912.95
LGU Equity :P 2,707,912.95

L. Economic Indicators
1) Economic Net Present Value (ENPV) : ________
2) Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) : ________
3) Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) : ________

M. Conclusion and Recommendations : a statement as to whether or not the project has

been found feasible from the marketing,
technical, economic and operational
viewpoint.

1
I. Introduction

Municipal Background

Montevista became a regular Municipality on June 18, 1966 by virtue of Republic Act
No. 4808 comprising the six barangays of San Jose, New Visayas, Camansi, Bankerohan Norte,
Bankerohan Sur and Linoan. These barangays were formerly part of the municipalities of
Nabunturan, Monkayo, Compostela and Asuncion.

The municipality of Montevista is located in the northern part of Davao de Oro and it
is about 12 kilometers from Nabunturan, the Provincial Capital. It falls within the latitude of
7’41”-7’52” SSE and 124’53”-126’ 03 NNE longitude. It is bounded on the north by the
municipality of Monkayo; on the south by the municipality of Nabunturan, on the southwest
by the municipality of New Corella, on the northwest by the municipality of Laak and on the
east by the municipality of Compostela. It is accessible by land transportation for vehicles
plying to Davao City-Butuan route. It lies south of Davao City, which is the seat of the regional
center, with an approximate distance of 102 kilometers.

Figure No.___
Map of Region XI showing the Province of Davao de Oro

2
 Figure No.
Map of Davao de Oro Province showing the Municipality of Montevista

The municipality has a total land area of 26,559.54 hectares. It constitutes 5.69
percent of the total land area of Davao de Oro Province and 1.35 percent to the total land
area of Davao Region.

%
Particular Land Area
Montevista 26,559.54
Davao de Oro 466,693
Region XI 1,967,183
Montevista / Davao de Oro 5.69
Montevista / Region XI 1.35

The municipality is politically subdivided into 20 barangays. Barangay Prosperidad is

the largest among barangays of the municipality with an area of 4,088.53 hectare or 15.39
percent to the total land area of Montevista. Barangay San Vicente follows with an area of
2,390.38 hectare or 9 percent. Barangay Bankerohan Sur has the smallest land area covering
533.02 hectare or 2.01 percent of the land area of the Municipality.

3
 Table No.
Land Area Distribution by Barangay

Barangay Land Area (in hectare) % to Total

Banagbanag 1,152.92 4.34
Banglasan 1,511.25 5.69
Bankerohan Norte 650.47 2.45
Bankerohan Sur 533.02 2.01
Camansi 1,680.22 6.33
Camantangan 567.17 2.14
Canidkid 771.67 2.90
Concepcion 847.86 3.19
Dauman 582.33 2.19
Lebanon 1,114.31 4.20
Linoan 1,614.89 6.08
Mayaon 2,132.56 8.03
New Calape 1,189.51 4.48
New Cebulan 933.01 3.51
New Dalaguete 581.67 2.19
New Visayas 1,191.97 4.49
Prosperidad 4,088.53 15.39
San Jose 1,795.00 6.76
San Vicente 2,390.38 9.00
Tapia 1,230.80 4.63
Total 26,559.54 100
Source: MPDO, Montevista, Davao de Oro

4
 Figure No.
Administrative Map of the Municipality

Demographics

The Municipality has a household population of 46,558 during the 2020 census of
population. It has an increase of 2,852 compared to the 2015 census of population with a
growth rate of 1.63 per cent.

The school going population of the municipality is 23,306 which is equivalent to 50.32
per cent of the municipal household population. It is composed of Pre-School Children with
5,755, the Elementary with 6,157, the Secondary with 8,100 and the Tertiary with 3,294. It is
observed that the male population dominates the female population in school going age
population.

The working – age population is 28,891 equivalent to 62.38 per cent of the municipal
household population. The male working – age population is more than the female working
– age population with a sex ratio of 1.15. The same with the labor force, the male labor force
is more than the female labor force with the sex ratio of 1.13. The labor force of the municipal
population is 31,341 which is 67.67 per cent of the household population.

The dependency ratio is equal to 60.29 per cent. There are 60 dependents in every
100 persons in the working age. The young dependents constitute 51.82 per cent or 52 young
5
dependents in every 100 persons in working age. While the old dependents constitute the
remaining 8.4 per cent or equivalent to 8 old dependents in every 100 persons in working age.

Table No.
Population Composition by School-Age, Working-Age, Dependent-Age Group and Sex,
2020

Both Male Female

Age Group Sex Ratio
Sexes No. % No. %
School going population 23,306 24,225 52.31 22,087 47.69 1.10
Pre-school (3-6) 5,755 2,935 51% 2,820 49% 1.04
Elementary (7-12) 6,157 3,202 52% 2,955 48% 1.08
Secondary (13-18) 8,100 4,374 54% 3,726 46% 1.17
Tertiary (19-22) 3,294 1,779 54% 1,515 46% 1.17
Working Age (15-64) 28,891 15,312 53% 13,579 47% 1.13
Labor Force (15 and over) 31,341 16,658 53% 14,683 47% 1.13
Dependent Population 17,421 9,059 52% 8,362 48% 1.08
Young (0-14) 14,971 7,785 52% 7,186 48% 1.08
Old (65-over) 2,450 1,225 50% 1,225 50% 1.00
Source: Computed based on the latest PSA data on population

Population Distribution

The population of the municipality is predominantly young. The population from age
group 0-4 to age group 20 – 24 is 23,683 or equivalent to 51.13 per cent of household
population of the municipality.

Male dominated the number of population in all age-groups in 2015. Male recorded
52% of the household population of the municipality in 2015 and roughly 53% in 2015 census
of population. Only in age-groups 70 – 74 and 80 and over that female has a greater in number
than male.

6
 Table No.
Population Distribution by Age Group and Sex

Censal Year 2 – 2020 Censal Year 1 – 2015

Age Group
Male Female Total Male Female Total
Under 1 - - - 569 455 1,024

0-4 2,439 2,270 4,709 2,243 2,055 4,298

5-9 2,532 2,438 4,970 2,603 2,552 5,155

10 - 14 2,781 2,511 5,292 2,636 2,319 4,955

15 - 19 2,439 2,394 4,833 2,635 2,227 4,862

20 - 24 2,067 1,812 3,879 1,841 4,029

2,188

25 - 29 2,036 1,736 3,772 1,735 1,449 3,184

30 - 34 1,824 1,556 3,380 1,492 1,312 2,804

35 - 39 1,546 1,329 2,875 1,287 1,216 2,503

40 - 44 1,337 1,170 2,507 1,332 1,144 2,476

45 - 49 1,197 1,067 2,264 1,142 1,062 2,204

50 - 54 1,159 1,001 2,160 968 842 1,810

55 - 59 906 882 1,788 744 650 1,394

60 - 64 766 667 1,433 508 494 1,002

65 - 69 470 500 970 388 370 758

70 - 74 314 319 633 285 288 573

75 - 79 234 229 463 163 180 343

80 and over 178 206 384 150 147 297

Total 24,225 22,087 46,312 23,068 20,603 43,671

7
Current and Projected Population by Barangay, Urban – Rural

The projected population by barangay is computed based on the projected population

of the municipality in the next nine years, 2023 – 2032, and the participation rate of barangay
population in 2020 census of population. Barangay San Jose, the urban barangay, has the
highest projected population of 11,019 in 2032 that constitute 19.49 per cent of the municipal
population.
Among the rural barangay, Barangay New Visayas has the highest projected
population of 7,009 followed by Barangay Linoan and Mayaon with a projected population of
5,808 and 4,049, respectively in 2032. The lowest number of projected population is Barangay
Banglasan with 1,009 in 2032.

Table No.
Current and Projected Population by Barangay, Year 2023-2032

Projected Population
BARANGAY
2020 PR 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030
46,55 48,87 49,66 50,47 51,30 52,13 52,98 53,85 54,72
TOTAL 1
8 2 9 8 1 7 7 1 9
Urban
10,00 10,16 10,32 10,49 10,66
San Jose 9,076 0.2 9,527 9,682 9,840
0 4 9 8 9
1
10,00 10,16 10,32 10,49 10,66
Sub-Total 9,076 0.2 9,527 9,682 9,840
0 4 9 8 9
1
Rural

Banagbanag 1,358 0.0 1,425 1,449 1,472 1,496 1,521 1,546 1,571 1,596
3

Banglasan 831 0.0 872 887 901 916 931 946 961 977
2
Bankerohan
1,356 0.0 1,423 1,447 1,470 1,494 1,518 1,543 1,568 1,594
Norte
3

Bankerohan Sur 1,473 0.0 1,546 1,571 1,597 1,623 1,650 1,676 1,704 1,731
3

Camansi 1,573 0.0 1,651 1,678 1,705 1,733 1,761 1,791 1,819 1,849
3

8
Camantangan 973 0.0 1,021 1,038 1,055 1,072 1,090 1,107 1,125 1,144
3

Concepcion 1,777 0.0 1,865 1,896 1,927 1,958 1,990 2,022 2,055 2,089
3

Dauman 1,711 0.0 1,796 1,825 1,855 1,885 1,916 1,947 1,979 2,011
4

Canidkid 1,331 0.0 1,397 1,420 1,443 1,467 1,490 1,515 1,539 1,565
4

Lebanon 1,206 0.0 1,255 1,287 1,308 1,329 1,351 1,373 1,395 1,418
3

Linoan 4,184 0.0 4,392 4,464 4,536 4,610 4,685 4,762 4,839 4,918
8

Mayaon 3,335 0.0 3,501 3,558 3,616 3,675 3,735 3,796 3,857 3,920
8

New Calape 1,061 0.0 1,114 1,132 1,150 1,169 1,188 1,208 1,227 1,247
2

New Dalaguete 1,036 0.0 1,087 1,105 1,123 1,142 1,160 1,179 1,198 1,218
2

New Cebulan 966 0.0 1,014 1,031 1,047 1,064 1,082 1,099 1,117 1,136
3

New Visayas 5,773 0.0 6,060 6,159 6,259 6,361 6,464 6,570 6,677 6,786
8

Prosperidad 2,652 0.0 2,783 2,829 2,875 2,922 2,970 3,018 3,067 3,117
6

San Vicente 2,274 0.0 2,387 2,426 2,465 2,506 2,547 2,588 2,630 2,673
4

Tapia 2,612 0.0 2,742 2,787 2,832 2,878 2,925 2,973 3,021 3,070
6
37,48 39,33 39,98 40,63 41,30 41,97 42,65 43,34 44,05
Subtotal
2 1 9 6 0 4 9 9 9

9
Economy

The municipality’s economy revolve mainly on agriculture. More than 66 percent of its
land resources or an approximate 17,970.54 hectares of land are devoted to agriculture more
specifically on rice production, high valued commercial crops and other agricultural activities.

Livestock and poultry production are also integrated as one viable farming activities for
the municipality given the number of farmers who are engage in both livestock and poultry
raising in some of the barangays in the municipality.

A progressive 500 sow level commercial piggery in barangay New Visayas has also been
a viable source of livelihood for the people in terms of employment and business. However, this
commercial piggery has temporarily stopped its operation due to the influx of the ASF,
nevertheless the local government did not discount it as a setback given that the company has
signified its intent work back pending internal negotiations with its owners. A commercial
banana plantation owned by the Sumitomo Fruits Corporation (Sumifru) are also evident in 5
barangays which became a source of livelihood for the people.

Agriculture and Rural Development Sectors

Montevista is adjudged as a predominantly an agricultural producing municipality based

on the classification stipulated in the municipal comprehensive development plan of the
municipality. Although the municipality lacks the access to coastal resources; however, the local
government has redirected its effort into developing its lowland and upland resources to
becoming more productive in the aspect of production for economic improvement.
A. Crop Production:

The Municipality of Montevista is primarily an agriculture - producing municipality

given the vast land devoted to agriculture comprising an approximate aggregate area of
17,970.54 hectares. These lands which are utilized for agricultural annual crops and
permanent crops composed about sixty-six percent (66%) of the total land area of the
municipality. Although a little portion of these lands are also planted to commercial tree
species, however, are classified to be within the agricultural producing areas.

On the contrary, there are annual or cash crops like corn, vegetables, root crops and
even bananas that are also planted at high degree slopes which are classified not appropriate
for sustainable farming and valuable production. Major crops of the Municipality aside from
rice and corn are coconut, banana and cacao on coco-based diversified farming. Rubber,
coffee and vegetables are also produced in identified barangays.

Table No. 81
Comparative Agricultural Crop Areas and Production, Year 2015-2016
Area (ha) Volume of Production MT
Major
Year 1 Year 2 %Increase Year 1 Year 2
Crops %Increase/
(2015) (2016) / (2015) (2016)

10
 Decrease Decrease
Rice 3,021 3,028 0.23 10,851 11,445 5.94
Corn 1,900 2,000 5.26 6,827 7,000 2.53
Cacao 595 615 3.25 490 520 5.77
Banana 1,450 1505 3.65 5200 5405 3.79
Coconut 4,092 4546 9.99 2,806 3,083.8 9.00
Rubber 115.5 127.5 9.40 49.5 51.6 4.07
Source: Municipal Agricultural Office

B. Livestock and Poultry:

Livestock and poultry had been considered indispensable in the municipality. Table
shows the number of animals raised in the different barangays of the municipality particularly
in the backyard. The presence of Valderrama Piggery Farm for hog production and Juniel’s
Farm for native (improved) chicken production have given positive effect on livestock in the
commercial sector since many businessmen and individuals availed the supply of hogs and
chicken from these farms.

Chicken has become the most widely raised in poultry consisting of 78,123 heads,
followed by swine3679 andgoat 1347.Carabao and cattle are also raised for draft
purposes.Livestock and poultry production is the most common component in an integrated
farming system engaged by farmers.

Livestock and poultry production areas at Purok 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of Barangay

Banagbanag are at high risk to flooding while those at Purok 2, 3, 5 and 7 of Linoan, Purok 1A,
1B, 1C, 4, 4B, 5, 6A, 7 and 8 of San Jose, Purok 2, 4,5 and 7 of New Visayas,Purok 6 of
Bankerohan Sur and Purok 2 and 4 of Dauman are at moderate risk to flooding.

Table No. 83
Existing Livestock and Poultry Farms, Year 2016
Hazard
Ar No Produc Production
Susceptibility
ea . of tion Product
Type Barangay Volu Fl Ln
(ha He Classifi Value Market
me
) ads cation (Php)
(kg)
Livestock
Carabao Banag- 49. 74 Backyar 330,00 H
3,300 Local
banag 3 d 0
78
Backya 245,00
Banglasan 52. 3,450 Local
rd 0
0 78

11
 30. 46 Backyar 210,00 M
Bank Norte 2,100 Local
7 d 0
8 Backyar M
Bank Sur 300 30,000 Local
5.3 d
Camantang 18. 28 Backyar 120,00 H
1,200 Local
an 7 d 0
72. 108 Backyar 480,00
Camansi 4,800 Local
0 d 0
41. 62 Backyar 270,00
Canidkid 2,700 Local
3 d 0
34. 52 Backyar 240,00
Concepcion 2,400 Local
7 d 0
38. 58 Backyar 270,00
Dauman 2,700 Local
7 d 0
37. 56 Backyar 240,00
Lebanon 2,400 Local
3 d 0
33. 50 Backyar 240,00 M
Linoan 2,400 Local
3 d 0
52. 78 Backyar 345,00
Mayaon 3,450 Local
0 d 0
41. 62 Backyar 270,00
New Calape 2,700 Local
3 d 0
New 50. 76 Backyar 330,00
3,300 Local
Cebulan 7 d 0
New 30. 45 Backyar 210,00
2,100 Local
Dalaguete 0 d 0
New 35. 53 Backyar 225,00
2,250 Local
Visayas 3 d 0
65. 98 Backyar 450,00
Prosperidad 4,500 Local
3 d 0
40. 60 Backyar 270,00
San Jose 2,700 Local
0 d 0
52. 78 Backyar 345,00
San Vicente 3,450 Local
0 d 0
45. 68 Backyar 300,00 M
Tapia 3,000 Local
3 d 0
Cattle 5 Backyar 18,000 H
Banagbanag 150 Local
3.3 d
12 Backyar 54,00
Banglasan 450 Local
8.0 d 0
12 Backyar 54,00
Bank Norte 450 Local
8.0 d 0
5 Backyar 18,00
Bank Sur 150 Local
3.3 d 0
Camantang 12 Backyar 54,00
450 Local
an 8.0 d 0

12
 13. 20 Backyar 108,0
Camansi 900 Local
3 d 00
5 Backyar 18,000
Canidkid 150 Local
3.3 d
10 Backyar 54,00
Concepcion 450 Local
6.7 d 0
10 Backyar 54,00 M
Dauman 450 Local
6.7 d 0
13. 20 Backya 108,0
Lebanon 900 Local
3 rd 00

Continuation of Table No. 83

Hazard
Ar No Produc Production
Susceptibility
ea . of tion Product
Type Barangay Volu Fl Ln
(ha He Classifi Value Market
me
) ads cation (Php)
(kg)

Livestoc
k
Cattle 6 Backya 36,00 M
Linoan 300 Local
4.0 rd 0
13. 20 Backya 108,0
Mayaon 900 Local
3 rd 00
New 10. 15 Backya 72,00
600 Local
Calape 0 rd 0
New 38. 58 Backya 846,0
7,050 Local
Cebulan 7 rd 00
New 32
Backya 162,0
Dalaguet 21. 1,350 Local
rd 00
e 3
New 43. 65 Backya 342,0
2,850 Local
Visayas 3 rd 00
Prosperid 24. 36 Backya 180,0
1,500 Local
ad 0 rd 00

13
 16. 25 Backya 126,0 M
San Jose 1,050 Local
7 rd 00
San 0 Backya
0 0 Local
Vicente 0.0 rd
10 Backya 54,00 M
Tapia 450 Local
6.7 rd 0
Hogs Banagban 0.0 19 Backya 639,9 H
7,110 Local
ag 36 8 rd 00
Banglasa 0.0 68 Backya 218,7
2,430 Local
n 12 rd 00
Bank 0.0 15 Backya 502,2
5,580 Local
Norte 28 6 rd 00
0.0 60 Backya 194,4
Bank Sur 2,160 Local
11 rd 00
Camanta 0.0 80 Backya 259,2
2,880 Local
ngan 14 rd 00
0.0 83 Backya 267,3
Camansi 2,970 Local
15 rd 00
0.0 82 Backya 263,2
Canidkid 2,925 Local
15 rd 50
Concepci 0.0 28 Backya 10,30 927,4
Local
on 52 7 rd 5 50
0.0 82 Backya 263,2 M
Dauman 2,925 Local
15 rd 50
0.0 62 Backya 198,4
Lebanon 2,205 Local
11 rd 50
0.0 29 Backya 10,62 955,8 M
Linoan Local
53 5 rd 0 00
0.0 27 Backya 899,1
Mayaon 9,990 Local
50 8 rd 00
New 0.0 22 Backya 737,1
8,190 Local
Calape 41 8 rd 00
New 0.0 12 Backya 405,0
4,500 Local
Cebulan 23 6 rd 00
New 17
Backya 558,9
Dalaguet 0.0 3 6,210 Local
rd 00
e 31
New 0.0 35 Com/B 12,60 1,134,
Local
Visayas 63 0 ackyard 0 000
Prosperid 0.0 21 Backya 704,7
7,830 Local
ad 39 8 rd 00
0.0 38 Backya 13,68 1,231, M
San Jose Local
68 0 rd 0 200
San 0.0 84 Backya 274,5
3,050 Local
Vicente 15 rd 00
14
Continuation ofTapia
0.0 38 Backya 13,99 1,259, M
Table No. 83 Local
70 9 rd 5 550
Banagban 20 Backya 28,80 H
240 Local
ag 4 rd 0
Banglasa 15 Backya 21,60
180 Local
n 3 rd 0
Bank 15 Backya 21,60
180 Local
Norte 3 rd 0
43 Backya 61,92
Bank Sur 516 Local
8.6 rd 0
Camanta 16. 82 Backya 118,0
984 Local
ngan 4 rd 80
40 Backya 57,60
Camansi 480 Local
8 rd 0
16. 82 Backya 118,0
Canidkid 984 Local
4 rd 80
Concepci 12. 63 Backya 90,72
756 Local
on 6 rd 0
39 Backya 56,16 M
Dauman 468 Local
7.8 rd 0
48 Backya 69,12
Lebanon 576 Local
9.6 rd 0
Goat 75 Backya 108,0 M
Linoan 900 Local
15 rd 00
50 Backya 72,00
Mayaon 600 Local
10 rd 0
New 14. 74 Backya 106,5
888 Local
Calape 8 rd 60
New 50 Backya 72,00
600 Local
Cebulan 10 rd 0
New 39
Backya 56,16
Dalaguet 468 Local
rd 0
e 7.8
New 37 Backya 53,28
444 Local
Visayas 7.4 rd 0
Prosperid 75 Backya 108,0
900 Local
ad 15 rd 00
16. 82 Backya 118,0 M
San Jose 984 Local
4 rd 80
San 16. 82 Backya 118,0
984 Local
Vicente 4 rd 80
49 Backya 70,56 M
Tapia 588 Local
9.8 rd 0

15
 Hazard
Ar No Produc Production
Susceptibility
ea . of tion Product
Type Barangay Volu Fl Ln
(ha He Classifi Value Market
me
) ads cation (Php)
(kg)

Livestoc
k
Poultry Banagban 0.0 2,6 Backya 354,4 H
2,363 Local
- ag 7 50 rd 50
Chicken Banglasa 0.0 3,7 Backya 504,6
3,364 Local
n 9 38 rd 00
Bank 0.0 2,0 Backya 272,5
1,817 Local
Norte 5 19 rd 50
0.0 2,2 Backya 306,9
Bank Sur 2,047 Local
6 74 rd 90
Camanta 0.0 2,5 Backya 340,2
2,268 Local
ngan 6 20 rd 00
0.0 3,7 Backya 502,9
Camansi 3,353 Local
9 26 rd 50
0.0 2,1 Backya 293,6
Canidkid 1,958 Local
5 75 rd 25
Concepci 0.0 2,5 Backya 340,2
2,268 Local
on 6 20 rd 00
0.0 2,8 Backya 389,0 M
Dauman 2,593 Local
7 82 rd 03
0.0 2,2 Backya 302,5
Lebanon 2,017 Local
6 41 rd 35
0.1 6,8 Com/ B 6,163 654,4 M
Linoan Local
7 48 ackyard 80
0.2 9,9 Backya 1,341,
Mayaon 8,944 Local
5 38 rd 563
New 0.0 2,9 Backya 403,3
2,689 Local
Calape 7 88 rd 80
New 0.0 2,1 Backya 283,5
1,890 Local
Cebulan 5 00 rd 00
New 2,1
Backya 288,7
Dalaguet 0.0 39 1,925 Local
rd 65
e 5
New 0.0 2,9 Backya 392,8
2,619 Local
Visayas 7 10 rd 50
Prosperid 0.1 4,3 Backya 583,2
3,888 Local
ad 1 20 rd 00

16
 10, M
Backya 1,408,
San Jose 0.2 43 9,388 Local
rd 185
6 1
San 0.1 5,8 Backya 785,7
5,238 Local
Vicente 5 20 rd 00
0. 3,8 Backya 525,4 M
Tapia 3,503 Local
10 93 rd 88
Source: MAGRO / CLUP – TWG, Montevista, Davao de Oro

C. Fishery

Inland fish production is acknowledged as the only source of fishery products of the
municipality. Inland fish production is only limited to backyard fishponds, ranging from 500
square meters to 1.2 hectares with a total of 5.731 hectares in the 15 barangays of the
municipality and with a total of 184 fisherfolks. The magnitude of fishpond products can be
found in 5 major inland fish producing barangays -Mayaon, Bankerohan Norte, Prosperidad,
New Visayas and Camansi.

Table No. 84
Existing Fishing Grounds and Aquaculture Production, Year 2016
Hazard
Production Post-Harvest Facilities suscepti
Fishin Prod
bility
g Baran uct
Nu Fl Ln
Grou gay Volu Mar
Valu m Capac
nds me Type Status ket
e be ity
(mt)
r
Inlan Maya 2.65 Functio Loca M H
d on Hook & Line 8 500 g nal l

17
 185, 20 – Functio
250. Lantern 2 50 kg nal
00 20 – Functio
Cast Net 2 50 kg nal
Spear Fishing Functio
Gadget 1 1 kg nal
Banke 1.4 98,0 20 – Functio Loca M M
rohan 00.0 Cast Net 1 50 kg nal l
Norte 0 Functio
Hook & Line 5 500 g nal
Cama 1.9 133, Functio Loca M H
nsi 000. Hook & Line 4 500 g nal l
00 Spear Fishing Functio
Gadget 1 1 kg nal
Canid 0.75 52,5 Functio Loca M H
kid 00.0 Hook & Line 1 500 g nal l
0 20 – Functio
Cast Net 1 50 kg nal
Spear Fishing Functio
Gadget 1 1 kg nal
Cama 0.15 10,5 L H
ntang 00.0 No Loca
an 0 None ne l

Continuation of Table No. 84

Hazard
Fishin Production Post-Harvest Facilities Prod suscepti
g Baranga uct bility
Grou y Volu Nu Mar Fl Ln
Capac
nds me Value Type mbe Status ket
ity
(mt) r
Inlan 0.3 21,00 Hook & Functio Loca H M
d San Jose 1.15 0.00 Line 2 500 g nal l H L

18
 New 220,5 20 – Functio Loca
Visayas 00.00 Lantern 2 50 kg nal l
Cast 20 – Functio
2
Net 50 kg nal
Cast 20 – Functio
Net 1 50 kg nal
New 0.3 26,00 Non Loca M H
Calape 0.1 0.00 None e None l
Prosperi 7,000. Non Loca M H
dad 00 None e None l
Source: MAGRO / CLUP – TWG, Montevista, Davao de Oro
Notes: Fl – flood; Ln- Landslide

b. Project Identification and Prioritization Profile

i. E-VSA Maps and Statistics (Show and discuss the data of the priority commodity
that is presented in the E-VSA Maps and Statistics)
ii. Value Chain Summary (Cite discussion and findings from Value Chain Analysis.)
iii. Commodity Profile (Cite excerpts from PCIP-the rationale of the SP inclusion in
the PCIP.
Highlight how the subproject was identified and how it will support the specific
Value Chain. Establish the issue/ problem that the proposal will address to
strengthen the Value Chain of the priority commodity.)

c. Existing I-REAP Enterprises to be supported by the Subproject (if none, then cite the
existing enterprise/s relative to the priority commodity that will be supported by the
subproject)

d. Other I-BUILD Subprojects funded by the Project (Only if applicable, identify other
subprojects funded by the Project located in the same municipality/city and describe the
status of its implementation. These include SPs proposed and implemented by PLGU).

II. The Subproject

Location:

The proposed project is located at Barangay New Visayas, Montevista, Davao de

Oro which is approximately 5 kilometers from Barangay San Jose (Poblacion) where the
government center is situated. Barangay New Visayas is located north of the municipality
classified as a rural barangay according to the zonification plan of the municipality. It is
about 1.5 hectares of agricultural land purchased by the municipal government
sometime in the year 2000 designated to be develop and to house the progressive

19
agriculture demonstration farms and consequently the municipal slaughterhouse of the
municipality. The site can be considered as an ideal location for a progressive
slaughterhouse giving consideration to accessibility, availability of power supply which
can be delivered/served by the North Davao Electric Cooperative (NORDECO) and
abundant supply of potable water.

Figure No. 18
Administrative Map of the Municipality

Geography

New Visayas is located north from the government center of the municipality (San
Jose) and is positioned as a boundary barangay to the nearby municipality of Compostela
in Davao de Oro.

The commercial growth center is located in the Poblacion (San Jose) where
business and facilities are installed; however, with the comparative distance of more or
less 1.5 kilometers it is projected that a remarkable benefit can be seen once the project
is implemented.

Topogtaphy

The Topography of the project site can be considered to be favorable in relation

to the implementation of the project. The data on slope classification of the project site
20
 showed that more than 77 percent of its land area are considered to be level and
undulating comprising about 926.58 hectares. The slope 8-18% classified to be
undulating to rolling has acquired some 142 hectares registered to be the second in
terms of area coverage of the project site. Please refer to Table No. ____.

Table No. 20
Slope Classification of the Project Site

Barangay Name Description Area (ha) Percent

New Visayas 0-8% Slope, Level to Undulating 926.58 77.69%
18-30% Slope, Rolling to Hilly 92.85 7.79%
30-50% Slope, Hilly to Mountainous 30.34 2.54%
8-18% Slope, Undulating to Rolling 142.84 11.98%
Total 1192.61 100.00%

Mapping the Subproject

The proposed construction site for the Municipal Slaughterhouse will be in

Purok 5, New Visayas, Montevista, Davao de Oro. The site is about 1.5 kilometers from
Poblacion, San Jose to where a large portion of the population may be consuming the
by-product of the slaughterhouse such as the wet market and the consuming public.
The site is also accessible to the national highway which can be a great advantage to
clients that would access the facility.

Initial validation of the project site has been conducted by government

agencies such as DPWH, DOH/RHU and NMIS to determine its viability and available
supply of electricity and potable water. On top of these advantages it was discovered
that the site is classified as within the agricultural zone which has a comparative
advantage in the aspect of land uses as per stipulated at the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan of the municipality. Please refer to Table No. ____

Table No. 20
Proposed Municipal Slaughterhouse

Estimation of PIA

As mentioned earlier, the project site is located on an area classified to be very

accessible to both the livestock sources and the residential areas. It can be easily
accessed by proposed clients of the slaughterhouse given the availability of good access
roads (concreted highways), availability of all kinds of transportation and/or vehicles. It
was even projected that the facility can cater to clients outside of the municipality or
21
from nearby municipalities in the province considering its geographic location viz a viz
the barangays and the neighboring municipality.

Figure No. 18
Map Showing the Proposed Municipal Slaughterhouse

Demographics: (Brief description in 1 paragraph)

The proposed Municipal Slaughterhouse will be constructed in Purok 5, New

Visayas, Montevista, Davao de Oro. Barangay New Visayas has the largest population of
3,664 and a household population of 726 households which is ranked first in the rural
barangay classification of the municipality.

Table No. 04

22
 Household Population by Urban and Rural Barangay and Average Household Size, Year
2015

Average Household
Barangay Population Number of Household
Size

Urban
San Jose 9,080 2,147 4.23
Sub-Total 9,080 2,147 4.23
Rural
Banagbanag 1,365 344 3.97
Banglasan 999 245 4.08
Bankerohan Norte 1,166 243 4.80
Bankerohan Sur 1,401 328 4.27
Camansi 1,442 329 4.38
Camantangan 1,097 289 3.80
Canidkid 1,299 352 3.69
Concepcion 1,829 361 5.07
Dauman 1,644 396 4.15
Lebanon 1,257 266 4.73
Linoan 3,553 776 4.58
Mayaon 3,538 876 4.04
New Calape 1,074 210 5.11
New Cebulan 1,109 207 5.36
New Dalaguete 882 208 4.24
New Visayas 3,664 726 5.05
Prosperidad 2,787 596 4.68
San Vicente 1,900 507 3.75
Tapia 2,620 670 3.91
Sub-Total 34,626 7,929 4.37
Total 43,706 10,076 4.34
Source: Computed based on the latest PSA Data on Population

Major Economy and Land Use (Brief description in 1 paragraph)

The project site has acquired the relevant prerequisite to house the municipal
slaughterhouse. In terms of economy, Barangay New Visayas possess adequate economic
activity on top of the other barangays in the municipality. As an agricultural based barangay, it
has the remarkable venue of agricultural investment present such as crops, commercial banana
industry, vast rice fields, privately owned commercial piggery project, backyard livestock
production, etc..

23
In terms of land use, the local government based on its comprehensive land use plan (CLUP)
designated the project site as dominantly agricultural zone which permits the establishment of
the agri demonstration farm compatible to agricultural land use.

iv. On-farm data - Agricultural Area and Crops Planted, livestock and fisheries
(Brief description in 1 paragraph)
v. Off-farm data – processing and marketing industry of agri-fishery products
vi. Poverty Incidence (how the SP will address alleviation of poverty in the PIA)

III. Subproject Objectives

a. Subproject objectives relative to increase in market value of the product, decrease in

the hauling/marketing cost (if applicable), decrease transport losses (if applicable),
projected revenue of the operation. Include in the general objective statement about
the need to implement the facility to support the commodity in the VCA.

IV. Project Feasibility Indicators

a. Market Analysis/ Demand-Supply Analysis

i. Supply Side - Discuss the availability of supply (no. of farmers, sources and
volume of production in terms of number of heads per type of livestock. Also,
discuss if there is a significant factor in the supply such as seasonality of the
specific livestock)

No. of Livestock Inventory

Raisers Backyard Commercial TOTAL

(Location)

Swine

Cattle

Goat

NOTE: Please present the inventory of livestock of the projected Project

Influence Area (Barangays covered or Municipal wide figures)
Source:

ii. Discuss the current situation of the growers without the intervention.
iii. Discuss the facilities present that offer the same intervention as the proposed
facility and the volume they currently cater.

24
 Total livestock heads
Capacity Gap
Locatio for slaughter
Type (no. of heads/yr) (no. of heads/yr)
n (no. of heads/yr)

Cattle Swine Goat Cattle Swine Goat Cattle Swine Goat

Source:

iii. Demand Side - Discuss the farmer’s current situation/practice and their
willingness to use the facility (the number of farmers willing to use the facility,
how many are willing to use shift in the proposed intervention)
iv. Discuss the improvement in the capacity with the intervention of the proposed
facility and the volume that will be catered with the project

Total livestock heads

Capacity Gap
for slaughter
Location Type (no. of heads/yr) (no. of heads/yr)
(no. of heads/yr)

Cattle Swine Goat Cattle Swine Goat Cattle Swine Goat

Source:

vi. Demand-Supply Analysis - Describe the gap (degree of the need) between the
desired (With Project) and current (Without Project) condition. (Include
discussion/comparison on how the facility will be beneficial to the commodity,
as presented in VCA, with the project and without the project.)

b. Technical Analysis

i. Location of the proposed Slaughterhouse or Dressing Plant (with perspective)

ii. Description of Existing Structures (if any)
iii. Description of the proposed facility
iv. Design Properties of Materials
v. Load Assumptions
vi. Subproject Layout
25
 vii. Proposed Sources and Location of Quarries, Borrow Pits and Construction
Materials
a. Relative distance of quarry and construction materials to project
site/Dumping site for surplus excavation (Attach Certificate signed by
Brgy. Captain and Lot Owner)
b. Handling of materials
c. Dependability and availability of required quantities
viii. Items of work and cost (POW Summary) – is it within the cost parameter?
ix. Implementation schedule of the sub-project (project duration, estimated start
and end of construction)

c. Operational Analysis

i. Pre-Implementation Phase
a. Organizational Structure of the Project Management Implementing Unit
(PMIU) to be set up at either the provincial LGU, city LGU or municipal
LGU, that will manage the project and their roles and responsibilities.
Mention the executive order creating the PMIU.

ii. Implementation Phase

a. Plan for management during construction, key roles and responsibilities
of assigned full time construction site personnel.

iii. Post-Implementation Phase

a. Ownership and Management (Post-Impl
1. Operational Management Structure
- Describe the Operation team, how will the subproject be managed
~ clearly discuss the roles of the LGU and other partners
2. Organizational Chart
- Describe the personnel recruitment or staffing pattern and the
responsibilities of each staff, job descriptions
3. Project Monitoring and Financial Reporting

b. Facilities & Equipment

- Describe the needed facilities and equipment (existing and
proposed) of the enterprise. What is the input and output capacity?
How much will be the estimated costs per operation?

c. Resources and Production - What are the production methods, the

process and the inputs required for each process, and staffing?
1. Illustrate the process flow (major steps to perform from raw material
sourcing to processed form).
2. What is the operational process and input requirements (from the
staff/ laborers and from the farmer beneficiaries)? This can be
26
 presented in tabular format (process steps, description of the step,
where it occurs-geographic and/or physical location, expected inputs
required in terms of materials, tools, equipment, to perform the step,
expected output/result, who will perform this step?
3. What is your capacity and level of Production? In terms of units, in
Pesos?
4. What are the production cycles?
5. What are the costs to manage wastes and other possible negative
environmental impacts? ~SES Part

d. Operations
1. What is the projected production schedule of the facility? (Show the
projected number of heads to be slaughtered by type of livestock
from year 1 to year 10).
2. Monthly Operations showing seasonality (peak and lean, if applicable)
3. Fees and Charges
4. Operating Expenses

vi. Sustainability Plan

a. Operation and Maintenance Plan and Budget (show the operation and
maintenance financing mix)
1. Show and discuss the O&M activities as detailed in the Annual
Maintenance Cost in EFA Tab 3a
2. Show and discuss the Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost (refer
to EFA tab 3B
3. Show and discuss the Investment Reserves
4. Utilization and Maintenance Plan and Budget (how will the income be
used?)
- Plan on Expanding the Operation (if any)
- What are the required technical assistance to ensure continuous
operation

d. Social Analysis

i. Subproject Beneficiaries
ii. Indigenous Cultural Community/Indigenous Peoples (ICC/IP)
iii. Site and Right-of-Way acquisition
iv. Damage to standing crops, houses and/or properties
v. Physical displacement of persons
vi. Economic displacement of persons
vii. Grievance redress mechanism
viii. Labor-related Risks
ix. Occupational Health and Safety

27
 x. Community Health and Safety
xi. Conflict Context Assessment

e. Environmental Analysis

i. Natural habitat
ii. Physical Cultural Resources
iii. Terrain, Soil Types and Rainfall
iv. Natural and Geologic Hazards/Risk Assessment
v. Resource Conservation and Pollution Control
vi. Integrated Pest Management/DA KASAKALIKASAN
vii. Status of Environmental Clearances

f. Social and Environmental Impacts

g. Financial Analysis
i. Total Project Cost by Financing Source and Cost Sharing (WB LP, GOP-DA, LGU)
- Show Table of Project Cost Sharing
- Provide a short write-up/narrative/explanation.
ii. Total Project Cost Breakdown
a. Direct
b. Indirect
- Provide a short write-up/narrative/explanation.
iii. Status of LGU equity availability and LFC certification – attach appropriation
ordinance stating the 10% equity for the SP and Cost for O & M for 10 years.
- Provide a short write-up/narrative/explanation.
viii. Sales/Revenue
ix. Depreciation Expense
x. Projected Income Statement
xi. Cash Flow

h. Economic Analysis and Evaluation

1. Economic Benefits
- Enumerate the project benefits valuated for the analysis. Explain
briefly each benefit and how it is calculated
a. Increase in Market Value (Market Price)
- Describe the increase in market value of meat with and
without the SP.
Table ____ (No.) Market Value of Meat WOP and WP
Price

28
 Livestoc Differenc
WOP WP
k e

Swine

Cattle

Goat

- Discuss the benefits generated from the total production

relative the incremental increase in Value WP
Table ____ (No.) Projected Benefits with the increase in Market Value
Livestock Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10

Swine

Cattle

Goat

TOTAL
Source:

b. Decrease in Marketing/ Production Cost/ Slaughtering Fee (if

applicable)
- Provide a comparative cost With and Without the Project.
Enumerate the costs incurred in using the SP compared to the
fees paid using the existing facilities.

Table ____ (No.) Comparative Cost With and Without the SP

WOP WP
Livestoc Othe Differen
k Slaugh Slaughte Other ce
r Total Total
ter Fee ring Fee Fees
Fees

Swine

Cattle

Goat

29
 Source:

- Provide a short write-up/narrative/explanation for the table.

- Make reference to a relevant Model/Detailed Table # of EFA

c. Revenue Generated
- Show and discuss the projected revenue generated by the
subproject. Discuss the fees per head of livestock slaughtered
- Provide a short write-up/narrative/explanation for the table.
Table ____ (No.) Revenue Generated, YYYY
Schedule of Fees Annual
Livestoc Generate
k Slaughter d
Fee Revenue

Swine

Cattle

Goat

TOTAL
Source:

2. Economic Costs
a. Capital Cost and O & M Cost Breakdown
- Show Capital Cost based on the POW
- Show O & M Cost Breakdown (total amounts should be identified
according to the stipulated thresholds)
- Provide a short write-up/narrative/explanation

b. Social Safeguards Related (SES) Cost

- Discuss the costs incurred for the preparation of requirements
for SES compliance and other fees required for social preparation
that are not included in the POW. (Tax is already excluded for
fees paid to the government either in the LGU or national
offices/agencies, hence financial cost equals economic cost)
- Present tab on SES Cost, refer to new EFA Template

c. Net Value of Crop Production Foregone

- Discuss the benefits forgone due to implementation of the
project, i.e. annual and perennial crops and lumber (specifically
for crops/goods marketed only and does not include crops used
household consumption)
30
 - Show NVCP Foregone Summary, Production Cost for Perennial
and Seasonal Crops in EFA template

3. Direct Jobs
a. Construction1
- No. of Unskilled Laborers to be hired and corresponding wage rate
- No. of Skilled Laborers to be hired and corresponding wage rate
Provide a short write-up/narrative/explanation
b. Operations
- No of staff to be hired once the SP is operational
Provide a short write-up/narrative/explanation.

4. Social and Environmental Safeguards Cost

- Discuss the costs incurred for the preparation of requirements for SES
compliance and other fees required for social preparation that are not
included in the POW. (Tax is already excluded for fees paid to the
government either in the LGU or national offices/agencies, hence
financial cost equals economic cost)
- Present tab on SES Cost, refer to new EFA Template

5. Adjustment of Financial Values to Economic Terms

- Provide a short write-up/narrative/explanation.
- Show Tab1 of EFA template

6. Economic Benefits Foregone (Dis-benefits)

- Discuss the benefits forgone due to implementation of the project, i.e.
annual and perennial crops and lumber (specifically for crops/goods
marketed only and does not include crops used household
consumption)
- Show Tab 9a, b c and d of EFA template

7. Results of the Economic Analysis

- Present and discuss EIRR, ENPV and BCR results.
- Make reference to a relevant Model/Detailed Table # of EFA Template

8. Economic Sensitivity Results

- Present and discuss results of sensitivity analysis.
- Describe if project is feasible with the change in benefits and cost at
10%
- Show summary table on Sensitivity Analysis tab
- Make reference to a relevant Model/Detailed Table # of EFA Template

9. List of the attached Models/Detailed Tables of EFA Template

1
Based on Detailed Estimates in the Program of Works
31
 Table 1a Economic Cost of Sub-Project
Table 1b SES-Related Cost
Table 2 Investment and O&M Costs
Table 3a Maintenance Cost (Facility)
Table 3b Annual Operating and Maintenance Cost
Table 4 Benefit – Increase in Market Value
Table 5 Benefit – Revenue Generated from Fees (Economic)
Table 6a Net Value of Crop Production Foregone
Table 6b Annual Crop Production Cost
Table 6c Perennial Crop Production Cost
Table 7 Economic Analysis
Table 8 Sensitivity Analysis (on cost, benefits & delays)
Table 9 Financial Revenue – Willingness to Pay
Table 10 Financial Assumptions and Schedule of Operating Expenses
Table 11 Annual Salaries and Benefits
Table 12 Depreciation Schedule
Table 13 Cash Flow
Table 14 Income Statement

V. Conclusions and Recommendations

i. Conclusions
(Provide a brief summary of the result of analysis made as presented and
discussed in the major section of the FS, i.e., project identification,
geographical, supply and demand analysis, technical and operational analysis,
social and environmental analysis, financial, economic and sensitivity analysis.)
ii. Recommendations
(Provide recommendations based on the findings summarized in the
conclusion.)

ANNEX 2

Guidelines on the Inclusion of Safeguards-Related Costs

in the Economic and Financial Analysis of
I-BUILD Sub-Projects for Funding Under the PRDP Scale-Up

Guidelines on the Inclusion of Safeguards-Related Costs in the Economic and Financial Analysis
of I-Build Sub-Projects for Funding Under the PRDP Scale-Up

32
A. Background and Purpose

These guidelines shall be used by the Local Government Units (LGU) proponents with guidance
from the concerned PRDP Project Support Office (PSO) and Regional Project Coordination Offices
(RPCO), to account for and determine the Social and Environmental Safeguards (SES)-related
costs directly incurred in the planning and implementation of each proposed sub-project.

B. Coverage and Applicability

These guidelines shall be applicable to all proposed I-BUILD sub-projects for approval under the
PRDP Scale-Up.

C. Roles and Responsibilities

The LGU-proponents (i.e., LGU-SES focal persons and the LGU-Economist) shall identify the
relevant costs that will be included in the economic and financial analysis (EFA) of proposed I-
BUILD sub-projects, to be incorporated in the narrative economic and financial analysis section
of the sub-project feasibility study (FS).

The RPCO-SES staff shall guide and assist the LGU-proponents in identifying the relevant SES-
related financial cost items and monetary values to be included in the EFA of the proposed sub-
project. Specifically, the RPCO-SES staff shall assist the LGU-proponent to:

a. Fill in the “Financial costs at Year 0” column of EFA Tab1b – Safeguards-related

Costs (see Annex 1); and

b. In case of right-of-way acquisition of land where there are crops that will be
affected, determine the “type of crops, production area affected, number of trees cut,
and percentage of productive trees cut” in EFA Tab9a - Valuation of Net Value of Crop
Production Foregone Due to Right-of-Way Acquisition.

The RPCO Economist shall guide and assist the LGU-Economist in the preparation of the EFA
specifically the following:

a. Conversion of financial costs to economic values (EFA Tab1b) and incorporating these
in the EFA Tab1a – Economic Costs;

b. In case of right-of-way acquisition of land where there are crops that will be affected,
calculation of the annual net value of crop production foregone per type of crop
specifically the average production or yields, farm gate price per unit, and economic
production cost in EFA; and

33
 c. Incorporating the costs in items a and b above in the Economic Analysis worksheet of
the EFA2.

The SES staff and Economists in the PSO and NPCO shall provide technical assistance to their
respective RPCO counterparts.

D. Safeguards-Related Costs

The following safeguards-related financial costs of sub-projects, where applicable, shall be

included as indirect costs to be shouldered by the LGU-proponent. (See Table 1 below). All
safeguards financial costs of a specific sub-project shall be itemized under a separate indirect
cost item category and labeled as “Safeguards-related costs” in EFA Tab1a. SES-related costs
such as tree cutting permit, water permit, NCIP certification, PAPs consultation, etc., that are
included in the pre-feasibility/pre-engineering costs shall be identified separately and should be
part instead of the safeguards-related costs.

Table 1. Safeguards-related Costs in the EFA of Proposed I-BUILD Sub-projects

No. Safeguards Activity Financial Costs 1/ Economic Costs 2/
1 Consultations (project Food, venue, transportation, and Same but excluding taxes.
beneficiaries meeting, other logistics for all
PAPs consultation, FPIC consultations conducted. If part
or broad-based of the FS/pre-engineering costs,
consultation, Tribal these should be moved to the
Chieftain Certification) Safeguards-related Cost
category.
2 DENR ECC/CNC Application expenses such as Exclude: Payment for fees for
application fees, notarization government-issued permits
and other logistics and licenses.
3 NCIP for Certificate of Application fees and other
Precondition or logistics Include: Direct operating
Certificate of Non – expenses incurred by the
Overlap LGU/PG in securing the
permits/licenses, e.g.,
4 Tree Cutting Permit Application fees, consultant fees transportation costs, payment
(PCA or DENR) (if necessary) and other logistics. for services of IEE preparer,
Note that removal of trees may notarization, etc.
be part of the POW. Hence,
should be excluded.
5 NWRB Permit Application fees and other
logistics
6 Water Quality Initial testing fee. If part of the Same but excluding taxes.
Tests/Potability Test FS/pre-engineering costs, this
(i.e. for CIS and/or PWS) should be moved to the

2
Numbering of Economic Analysis and Net Value of Crop Production Foregone worksheets in the EFA may differ for each
subproject type (i.e., FMRs, Irrigation, PWS, Value Chain Support Infrastructures).
34
No. Safeguards Activity Financial Costs 1/ Economic Costs 2/
Safeguards-related Cost
category.
7 Transfer of electric Transfer/relocation cost Excluded
posts
8 Notarized Waiver/Quit Funds needed to cover the Only operating expenses
Claims and/or Deed of expenses for activities directly incurred in the processing of
Donations related to land/right-of-way ROW documents shall be
acquisition for the subprojects. included, e.g., notarization
(i.e. Notarization fees including fees, cost of parcellary
the taxes of transfer, cost of surveys, appraisal, annotation,
parcellary surveys and appraisal supplies, etc. Taxes shall be
of properties affected by the excluded.
projects and cost of annotation.)
Note that logistics for signing
should be included under
consultation activities.
9 For Public Lands Application fees and other Exclude: Payment for fees for
(Special land Use Permit annual forest charges (include 1st government-issued permits
(SLUP)/Forest Land Use year payment only) and licenses.
Agreement (FLAg)
and/or Foreshore Lease Include: Direct operating
Agreement (FLA) issued expenses incurred by the
by the DENR) LGU/PG in securing the
10 For SPs within Multiple- One-time Development Fee for permits/licenses, e.g.,
use Zone (MUZ) – non-profit projects of the transportation costs, payment
Special Use Agreement government (as per IRR of the E- for services of IEE preparer,
in Protected Areas NIPAS law) notarization, etc.
(SAPA) issued by the
DENR
11 Location and zonal Application fees and other
clearances logistics
12 Rehabilitation/Relocati Resettlement costs which Excluded in econ analysis since
on/Resettlement Action include acquisition of land, this would be considered as
Plan installation of water, another subproject which is
construction of houses, expected to incur costs and at
electricity and other basic the same time generate
utilities, transfer fees, additional economic benefits.
assistance through livelihood,
among others.

35
No. Safeguards Activity Financial Costs 1/
13 Land Compensation Entitlement based on market
between the PAPs value including the taxes of
and LGU transfer and cost of
annotation
14 Reconstruction of Replacement costs of
damaged structures materials of the structure
including labor. Note that
removal of structures is part of
the POW. Hence, should be
excluded.
Economic Costs 2/
Value of land shall be
excluded in the economic
analysis. In lieu of such,
include only the opportunity
cost of lands or lots affected
by the right-of-way
acquisition. The opportunity
costs shall be based on any
one of the following:
For privately-owned lands:
a) annual land rental or
lease rates per square meter
prevailing in the barangay
for such type of land
(multiplied by the specific
area in square meters of
land/lot affected); or
b) In case affected land is
being utilized for agricultural
production, opportunity cost
shall be the Net Value of
Crop Production (NVCP)
foregone. Please see the
NVCP Tab of the EFA and
refer to the guidelines
(Section E) provided in the
following pages for the
calculation of NVCP
foregone.
The derived annual
opportunity costs shall be
included as dis-benefits over
the economic life of the sub-
project.
Not included except for
removal of structures which
is part of the sub-project’s
scope of work (from POW).
36
 No. Safeguards Activity Financial Costs 1/ Economic Costs 2/

15 Compensation and/or Agreed cost of the affected
Replacement of trees/plants based on market
affected tree crops or value and/or cost of
other plants/foliage replacement trees. Note that
removal of trees may be part
of the POW. Hence, should be
excluded.
Note: to be included in Tab1b
of the EFA.
This section covers trees
that are non-fruit bearing or
sold for lumber and other
standing crops planted by
informal settlers. Economic
costs will be the current
market value of the affected
trees and other standing
crops and included as Year 0
cost.

Note: to be included in
Tab1b of the EFA.

Net value of production

foregone of fruit-bearing
and other productive tree
crops and seasonal crops
(that generate annual
income) shall be covered
under Section 13-b.

16 Resettlement Action Exclude: Payment for fees for Exclude: Payment for fees
Plan government-issued permits for government-issued
and licenses. permits and licenses.
17 Land Conversion
Include: Direct operating Include: Direct operating
expenses incurred by the expenses incurred by the
18 IP Plan LGU/PG in securing the LGU/PG in securing the
permits/licenses, e.g., permits/licenses, e.g.,
transportation costs, payment transportation costs,
19 Biodiversity for services of IEE preparer, payment for services of IEE
Management Plan notarization, etc. preparer, notarization, etc.

20 Cultural Heritage
Management Plan

21 Integrated Pest
Management Plan

21 Other SES Related

Cost

1/ Relevant costs shall be included as separate SES cost items in the total subproject investment
costs.
2/ Applicable to economic analysis of proposed I-BUILD subprojects.

37
 E. Guidelines on the Economic Valuation of Net Value of Crop Production (NVCP)
Foregone due to Right-of Way (ROW) Acquisition

Net value of crop production foregone shall be calculated to determine the economic
opportunity costs of agricultural lands affected by right-of-way acquisition.

Coverage:

1. Proposed I-BUILD sub-projects requiring ROW acquisition that are for approval under
the PRDP Scale Up; and,
2. Agricultural lands affected by ROW acquisition that are currently planted or have
standing productive crops including seasonal or annual crops (e.g., palay, corn, root
crops, etc.) or perennial crops (e.g., coconut, abaca, cacao, coffee, rubber, etc.).

General Instructions:

1. The attached excel tables (Annex 2.1) contain the data to be generated in the calculation
of the annual net value of production foregone for each type of crop affected by ROW
acquisition. These tables are incorporated in the updated EFA templates of proposed
I-BUILD sub-projects (e.g., Tab 9a, 9b and 9c in the EFA for FMR/ bridge/ FMR with
bridge; Tab 10a, 10b and 10c for potable water supply; Tab 5a, 5b and 5c for irrigation
system; Tab 6a, 6b and 6c for slaughterhouse/ dressing plants; Tab 8a, 8b and 8c for fish
landing/ feeder port, and; Tab 7a, 7b and 7c for warehouse and warehouse with MPDP).
The resulting annual net value of production foregone shall be included in the economic
cost-benefits stream as dis-benefits (EFA Tab on Economic Analysis).

2. Please refer to Table Guides 1 and 2 below for the specific definition of the data
requirements. It is also important to refer to the footnotes provided under each excel
table.

3. For all data used, cite the sources and reference year (use the latest census). If possible,
provide a link to the website of the data source.

Data to be generated:

1. Use NVCP Table 1 in case there are annual crops affected.

2. Use NVCP Table 2 in case there are perennial crops affected.

Guide 1. Seasonal or Annual Crops Affected Due to ROW Acquisition (for NVCP Table 1)

38

Data Requirements/Description
Production area affected This refers to the area that will be
affected by type of crop
Average annual This refers to the average annual
production per hectare production volume by type of crop
affected
Production output Specify in what form the crop
marketed in the form of produce is being marketed/sold.
(i.e. for palay: dry or fresh)
Farm gate price per unit This refers to the price per
(Php/kg) kilogram of the commodity.
Economic production This refers to the total cost of
cost per hectare per production including labor and
cropping inputs involved from land
preparation to harvesting.
Guide 2. Perennial Crops Affected Due to ROW Acquisition (for NVCP Table 2)
Data Requirements/Description
Reliable and acceptable data
sources/Acceptable method of
data gathering
Inventory done by the LGU.
(SES form 1)
Data must be supported with a
data sheet of the volume of
production. Data inputs are
encouraged to be from the
local level (Barangay, MLGU
and PLGU).
Data inputs are encouraged to
be from the local level
(Barangay, MLGU and PLGU).
Data inputs are encouraged to
be from the local level
(Barangay, MLGU and PLGU).
Data must be supported with a
data sheet on the related
production costs. (See attached
Table 1.a of Annex 2.2) Data
inputs are encouraged to be
from the local level (Barangay,
MLGU and PLGU).
Reliable and acceptable data
sources/Acceptable method of
data gathering
39
 No. of trees affected/to These are the number of trees Inventory done by the LGU.
be cut that will be cut down/affected for (SES form 1)
the right of way acquisition.
% productive These are the % of trees that are
productive. This can be obtained
by getting the number of trees
productive and the total number
of trees affected.
Equation:

% Productive =
No. of trees productive from the
area affected
Total no. of trees affected
Production Form of This refers to the form of the
output marketed product being marketed. (i.e. for
coconut: nut, copra)
Average production per This refers to the volume of
tree per year (kgs) production of the commodity in
the area (in kilograms) per year.
Farm gate price per unit This refers to the price per
(P/kg) kilogram of the commodity.
Economic production This refers to the total cost of
cost per tree production including labor and
inputs involved from crop
management to harvesting.
Shadow wage rate shall be
applied to labor costs.
Data inputs are encouraged to
be from the local level
(Barangay, MLGU and PLGU).
Data must be supported with a
data sheet on the volume of
production. Data inputs are
encouraged to be from the
local level (Barangay, MLGU
and PLGU).
Data inputs are encouraged to
be from the local level
(Barangay, MLGU and PLGU).
Data must be supported with a
data sheet on the related
production costs. (See attached
Table 2.a of Annex 2.2). Data
inputs are encouraged to be
from the local level (Barangay,
MLGU and PLGU).

Attachments:

Table 2.1 - Template of EFA Tab1b – Safeguards-related Costs

Table 2.2 - Pro-forma excel tables on valuation of net value of crop production foregone

Table 1. SES Related Cost

Financial
Cost at Year
Conversio Economic
Particulars 0
n factors Cost
(current
prices)
1. Consultation activities with Community and PAPS

40
 Financial
Cost at Year
Conversio Economic
Particulars 0
n factors Cost
(current
prices)
1.1 Consultations with PAPs 1.12 0.00
1.2 Consultations with Direct Beneficiaries 1.12 0.00
2. ECC application
2.1. Application fee
2.2 Services of IEE/EIA preparer 1.12 0.00
2.3. Notarization fees/Other operating expenses 1.12 0.00
3. NCIP Certification
3.1 Work and Financial Plan 1.12 0.00
4. ROW acquisition
4.1 Parcellary survey 1.12 0.00
4.2 Appraisal of properties affected 1.12 0.00
4.3 Notarization fees/Other operating expenses 1.12 0.00
4.4 Cost for Annotation 1.12 0.00
4.5 Compensation for land
4.6 Compensation and/or reconstruction of affected
structures
4.7 Compensation and/or replacement of affected 1.00 0.00
trees/plants /a
4.8 Cost of additional assistance or livelihood
5. Cutting of Trees
5.1 Tree cutting permit
5.2 Tree Replacement Plan
6. Resettlement Action Plan 1.12 0.00
7. Relocation/Transfer of Electric Post/s and other utilities
8. Location and Zonal Clearances
9. Land Conversion
10. Special Land Use Permit/ Forest Land Use Agreement
10.1 Application Fee
10.2 Annual Fee
11. Special Use Agreement in Protected Areas
11.1 One time Development Fee
12. Water Quality/ Potability Tests 1.12 0.00
13. NWRB Water Permit
13.1. Application fee
13.2 Processing/ Direct Operating Expense 1.12 0.00
14. IP Plan
14.1 Cost of plan preparation/ Direct Operating Expense 1.12 0.00
15. Biodiversity Management Plan
15.1 Cost of plan preparation/ Direct Operating Expense 1.12 0.00
41
 Financial
Cost at Year
Conversio Economic
Particulars 0
n factors Cost
(current
prices)
16. Cultural Heritage Management Plan
16.1 Cost of plan preparation/ Direct Operating Expense 1.12 0.00
17. Integrated Pest Management Plan
17.1 Cost of plan preparation/ Direct Operating Expense 1.12 0.00
18. Other Costs (please specify) 1.12 0.00
Total Cost 0.00 0.00

Note: All fees paid to the government should not be included in the Economic Cost

Note: All costs spent for the preparation of plans or fees paid to private individuals or
institutions must be included in the Financial Cost.
a/ Amount paid by the LGU as compensation to PAPs for trees and other plants affected by
ROW acquisition and included as Year 0 cost. Said trees/plants are non-fruit bearing or non-
productive, sold for lumber, or standing crops planted by informal settlers.

Annex A. SAMPLE SCHEDULES

Following is the format of sample FA schedules. Note that the default period of financial
analysis is 10 years but may be extended to 15 or 20 years depending on the agreed period
for specific large-scale enterprise subprojects.

Schedule 1 – Capital Investment Plan

Source of Fund
If Implem.Proponent is
Particulars 1/
UNIT GOP- either
QTY. TOTAL LP
COST DA LGU FCA/FCA Cluster
20% 5% 15% In-
60% 20%
Cash Cash Kind
Civil Works
Enterprise Cost
Working Capital 2/

TOTAL PROJECT COST

(TPC)

42
1/ Cost items should be itemized based on the requirements of the enterprise proposal. Please
refer to the annotated business outline.
2/ Working or trading capital shall be fully shouldered by Implementing Proponents.

Schedule 2 – Financing Mix

Amount
Fund Source Cost Sharing
(in Php)
LP 60%
GOP-DA 20%
LGU/FCA or FCA 20%
Cluster
Cash
In-Kind
Sub-Total
TPC 100%

Schedule 3 – Gantt Chart of Operation

Activity Year 1 …. Year 10

Month 1… …. …Month … Month
12
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 …. Week … Week
Day 1… …Day 7 Day … Day
Hauling
Processing
Step 1 ---
…..
Packaging
Delivery
Payment

Schedule 4 – Gantt Chart of Implementation

Activity YEAR 1 …. …YEAR

10
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6 M7 M8 M9 M10 M11 M12 ….
Pre-
Implementation
Specific Activity
Operation
Specific Activity
…..

43
Schedule 5 – Sales Schedule
Particulars Year 1 … Year 10
Month 1… ...Month 12 … ….
Volume
Price
Sales

Schedule 6 – Assumptions

Source of
Assumptions Data Required
Data
A. Pricing
A.1. Direct cost
A.1.1. ▪ Buying price for year 1
A.1.2. Raw materials ▪ Buying price for year 2 and onwards
A.1.3. Fuel and oil Price of fuel and oil
A.1.4. Packaging materials ▪ Number of packaging materials
▪ Capacity of packaging material
▪ Price per piece of packaging
materials
A.2. Administrative and
other operating costs
A.2.1. Supplies and
benefits
A.2.2. Other costs such as
permits and licenses
A.3. Taxes Tax Rate (If exempted, provide
certificate of exemption)
B. Other incomes ▪ Vehicle and facility rentals
▪ Marketing of by-products
C. Working capital requirement
For farming-based enterprise ▪ Percentage of sales on credit
▪ Credit terms with buyers (days
receivable)
▪ Percentage of costs of goods sold on
credit
▪ Credit terms with suppliers (days
payable)
▪ Production period (planting)
▪ Inventory period (from harvest to
delivery)

44

Assumptions
For processing
For marketing and/ or trading
D.Depreciation schedule (for
existing and proposed fixed
assets) – see sample table below
E. Comparative analysis of renting
vs owning vehicles (see sample
table below)
F. ……..
Schedule 7 – Technical Analysis
Assumptions
A. Production Schedule
For farming-based enterprise
For processing
For marketing and/ or trading
Schedule 8 – Trucking Schedule
Source of
Data Required
Data
▪ Percentage of sales on credit
▪ Credit terms with buyers (days
receivable)
▪ Percentage of costs of goods sold on
credit
▪ Credit terms with suppliers (days
payable)
▪ Inventory period (from purchase of
raw materials to manufacturing)
▪ Production period (manufacturing)
▪ Inventory period (from stocking to
delivery of finished products)
▪ Percentage of sales on credit
▪ Credit terms with buyers (days
receivable)
▪ Percentage of costs of goods sold on
credit
▪ Credit terms with suppliers (days
payable)
▪ Inventory period (from purchase to
delivery of traded goods)
▪ Acquisition costs
▪ Year of acquisition
▪ Estimated useful life
▪ Estimated salvage value (if applicable)
Decision criterion: if NPV (own) < NPV
(rent), then purchase vehicle.
Data Required Data Source
▪ Mortality rate (%)
▪ % Rejects
▪ Conversion ratio
▪ % losses per
activity
▪ Handling losses
45
 Origin Destinat Year Annual
ion Month Number Monthly Fuel
Week of Trips/ Fuel Cost
Day Month Cost
Distance Time of Volume Fuel Fuel Total (PhP)
(km) Travel (kg.) Consum Price Fuel
(min.) ption (PhP)` Cost
(L/km)
Hauling

Delivery

Schedule 9 – Cost of Raw Materials

Particulars Month 1… ….Month 12 Year 1… …Year 10

Total Volume (kg.)
Price (Php)
Total Cost of Raw Mat
(Php)

Schedule 10 - Salaries and Benefits

Position Wage Monthly Benefits No. of Total Annual

Rate Salary Workers Monthly Salaries
SSS PhilHealt Pag-ibig 13th
Expense &
h Month
Benefits
Pay

Schedule 11 – Comparative Cost Analysis for Vehicle

Truck 1 M1… M12 Y1… …. …Y10

RENTING
Rental expenses
Other related expenses
Total rental expenses

OWNING
Acquisition cost
46
 Other cash outflows:
Interest expenses (if applicable)
Fuel expenses (see hauling and
delivery schedules)
Repair and maintenance costs
Other administrative costs (e.g.
salaries of driver and crew,
licensing fees, insurance)
Total costs before salvage value
Less: Salvage value
Total ownership costs

Net Present Value for Renting

Net Present Value for Owning

Schedule 12 – Depreciation Schedule

Asset Qty Acquisition Total Estimated Remaining Book Salvage Annual
Cost Cost Useful Life Useful Life Value Value Depreciation
(10%) Cost

Schedule 13 – Income Statement

Particulars Year 1 Year 1… …Year 10

Month 1…. ….Month 12
Sales
Other Income
Gross Revenue
Less: Cost of Goods Sold
Net Revenue/Gross Profit
Margin
Less: Expenses
Operating Expense
Selling Expense
Administrative Expense
Depreciation
Taxes
Total Expenses
NET INCOME

Schedule 14 – Cash Flow

Particulars Year 0 Year 1 Year 1… …Year 10

Month 1…. ….Month 12
CASH INFLOW
47
Cash Investment 1/
Sales
Other Income
Total Cash Inflow
CASH OUTFLOW
Purchase of Assets 2/
Cost of Goods Sold
Operating Expense
Admin and Selling
Expenses
Total Cash Outflow
NET CASHFLOW
1/ Includes capital investment from PRDP Scale Up and IP cash equity.
2/ Purchase of assets as part of project investment.

Schedule 15 – Balance Sheet

Year 1
Particulars Year 1… …Year 10
Month 1…. ….Month 12
ASSETS
Current Asset
Cash
Non-Current Asset
Properties
TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Non-Current Liabilities
Total Liabilities

IP EQUITY
Total IP EQUITY

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND IP EQUITY

Schedule 16 - Payback Period

Total Invest Cost = 0.00

Years Net income Cumulative Total

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
48
 7
8
9
10

Schedule 17 – Break-Even Analysis

Product 1 Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10
Annual Fixed Cost
Selling Price
Unit Variable Cost
Total Variable Cost
Production Volume
Contribution Margin
Per Unit
Contribution Margin
Ratio
Break-even Units
Break-even Sales
Break-even Price
Average break-even
units
Average break-even
sales
Average break-even
price

Schedule 18 – Comparative Farmer’s Income

WOP
Particulars
Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10
Average Production
Area/Farmer
SALES
Total Volume Produced
Price per kg.
Total Sales

PRODUCTION COST
Materials Cost
Production Input
Labor Cost
Marketing Cost
Total Production Cost

NET INCOME

OTHER BENEFITS
49
Patronage Refund
Share Capital
Total Other Benefits

TOTAL FARMER
BENEFIT

WP
Particulars
Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10
Average Production
Area/Farmer
SALES
Total Volume Produced
Price per kg.
Total Sales

PRODUCTION COST
Materials Cost
Production Input
Labor Cost
Marketing Cost
Total Production Cost

NET INCOME

OTHER BENEFITS
Patronage Refund
Share Capital
Total Other Benefits

TOTAL FARMER
BENEFIT

Schedule 19 – Job Generation

Wage/ Month/
No. of Jobs Wage/ Annum/ Year
Position Person
WOP WP WOP WP WOP WP

50
 Supply Demand

Livest
Barangay Meat Meat Other Total
ock Househol Femal
Proces Vendor Institution Male Populatio
Raiser d e
sors s al supplier n
s

Banagbanag 9 - 2 - 272 1,358

Banglasan 166 831

Bankerohan
1,356
Norte 271

Bankerohan Sur 295 1,473

Camansi 315 1,573

Camantangan 195 973

Canidkid 266 1,331

Concepcion 355 1,777

Dauman 342 1,711

Lebanon 241 1,206

Linoan 837 4,184

Mayaon 667 3,335

New Calape 212 1,061

New Cebulan 193 966

New Dalaguete 207 1,036

New Visayas 1,155 5,773

Prosperidad 530 2,652

San Jose 1,815 9,076

San Vicente 455 2,274

Tapia 522 2,612

Other Institutional Buyer includes:

Data Source: PhilAtlas

51