Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This essay analyses the fault lines of the Middle East from historical
and geopolitical perspectives.
Introduction
Originally coined by the British Foreign Office in the 19th century, the
term the Middle East refers to the region between Western Asia in the
east and Egypt in the west. The British divided the region into three
sub-regions: the Near East, the area closest to the United Kingdom and
most of North Africa; the Far East, which was east of British India; and
the Middle East, which was between British India and the Near East.
Except for Turkey and Iran, the region is predominantly Arab and
predominantly Muslim. Modelled on European nation-states, most of
these countries are artificial creations, containing warring tribes for
whom nation-building is still in an embryonic stage.
The present crises in the Middle East are by and large an unfinished
agenda of the past, which has left several legacies. History being a
continuum, we can discern at least six distinct legacies of the history of
the region that are now playing their role, individually or collectively,
in the situation obtaining on the ground.
1. Ancient History
Known as the Fertile Crescent because of its fertile soil and rich
cultural history, the Middle East is the cradle of several civilizations
and the birthplace of three world religions. Because of its strategic
location at the crossroads of three continents, namely Asia, Africa, and
Europe, the Middle East has been the scene of internal conflicts and
external invasions throughout its history, absorbing the best and the
worst of all these great civilizations. While the Akkadians gave the
Middle East its cultural foundations, they also bequeathed to it the first
dimension of the present crisis, i.e., a racial and cultural schism among
the communities living in the region.
3. Islam
4. Ottomans
The Ottoman rule resulted in creating nationalistic feelings in the
hitherto diverse communities and invited, by default, the penetration
of European colonial powers—the fourth dimension of the crisis, i.e.,
Pan-Arabism and anti-imperialism feelings of the rulers and the
general public.
5. Colonialism
The Western colonial era gave the Middle East its present boundaries
as well as the oppressive, extractive state apparatus — the fifth
dimension of the crises, i.e. arbitrary nation-states with artificial
boundaries containing divided social, ethnic, and sectarian
composition and loyalties being ruled by non-representative regimes
that use these oppressive state structures to preserve themselves,
contain the centrifugal aspirations of the captive nationalities, or both.
6. Neo-colonialism
1. Location
This unique location has made the Middle East an arena where anyone,
who has the pretensions to be a global player, comes to jostle for
influence, starting regional conflicts. Albert Hourani, a British-
Lebanese historian who specialized in Middle Eastern studies, rightly
stated that “He who rules the Near East, rules the world; and he who
has interests in the world is bound to concern himself with the Near
East.”
2. Boundaries
Except for a few countries, the Middle East has been under Ottoman
Empire or European control for 500 years before WW1. After the First
World War, the rest of the decolonized part of the Ottoman Empire
was carved up and divided among the Europeans. The lines drawn on
the drawing boards to delineate the respective spheres of influence
between the French, the Italians, the Spanish, and the British, secretly
arranged through the Sykes-Picot Agreement (1916), became the
official borders when these countries got independence.
Whether these borders made sense or not, the USA, which inherited
the mantle of leadership of Western civilisation after the 2nd World
War, informally confirmed the legitimacy of these borders through the
Eisenhower Doctrine in 1957. These cartographic blunders of the
colonial powers have created arbitrary nation-states with artificial
boundaries, containing divided social, ethnic, and sectarian
compositions and loyalties.
3. Resources
This water insecurity has further escalated the ethnic conflicts and
sectarian strife for which the Middle East is notorious. According to
social scientists, 70% to 80% of conflicts in these countries’ rural
regions are water- and land-related. Some water disputes survive two
generations. One of the major points of contention between Turkey,
Israel, and Syria is the apportionment of water from the rivers.
4. Popular Unrest
5. Underdevelopment
All the countries in the Middle East carry a lot of historical baggage of
social, economic, and political underdevelopment inherited by them at
the time of their independence from their colonial masters. Ruled by
dynastic oligarchies, these countries suffer from economic and
technological backwardness, and widespread regional and tribal
inequality with stalled state-building and nation-building processes,
keeping most of the population as sideliners.
6. Divided Loyalties
While the tribal division of the Arab Society is thousands of years old,
the sectarian division among the Muslims started with the Prophet
Mohammed’s death in 632 and a power struggle over who would
succeed him in ruling the Islamic Caliphate. Though Ali lost the fight,
his supporters, the Shia, held on to the idea that he was the rightful
successor. Over some time, this group grew into an entirely separate
branch (sect) of Islam. Today, about 15 per cent of Muslims worldwide
are Shia, the majority in Iran and Iraq and a significant presence in
neighbouring countries.
All the above fault lines, individually and collectively, have given birth
to several interstate and intrastate conflicts and crises in the region,
which make the situation extremely complex and volatile. No war, big
or small, is a single-dimensional phenomenon. There is always conflict
among several actors for a variety of reasons, and several issues are at
stake.
There are nearly a dozen major and minor state and non-state actors
jostling for power and influence in the Middle East. We can discern at
least seven types of conflicts, crises, and wars going on among the
stakeholders, with multiple agendas and strange combinations. These
are:
While Saudi Arabia claims this position as being the custodian of the
two most sacred places in the Muslim world, Egypt aspires to this
position as the champion of Arab nationalism. Turkey lays claim to
being the inheritor of the Ottoman Empire, while for Israel, it is the
only way to ward off the existential threat it faces in hostile territory.
Iran is vying for the leadership role on two counts — as the inheritor of
the Old Iranian Empire and as the leader of the Shiite branch of Islam.
All of them are relying on different sources of support for their claims.
Iran is using its soft power in the form of shite communities and its
militant proxies, while Saudi Arabia has the political support of all the
Sunni states and the emotional backing of the Sunni population of the
region, as well as the support of the Western powers. Turkey and Israel
both have strong armies and Western support to advance their claims.
Some states and their proxy non-state actors are using this sectarian
division, which has so far been ignored or suppressed, as tools of
statecraft. Some of the non-representative oppressive regimes are also
promoting these conflicts to divert the attention of their respective
restive populations from their high-handedness.
This sectarian divide has now mutated into a war between two groups
of countries in the Middle East. Sunni nations like Egypt and Saudi
Arabia are at odds with Shiite nations like Iran, Syria, and Iraq. At the
same time, non-state groups are fighting among one another as well as
with the states in ways that cross state borders.
6. Struggle for Self Determination
7. Clash of Ideologies:
On the broad ideological plane, we may not agree with the clash of
civilizations thesis of Huntington, but there is no escaping the fact that
there are several ideological dimensions to these conflicts. No doubt
there has been a rivalry between the Christians and the Muslims in the
Middle East for many centuries, but by and large, it has never resulted
in an open war between the two communities. However, the creation of
the state of Israel introduced the third variable in the age-old equation:
political Jewry.
The onset of the Cold War introduced another ideological conflict, i.e.,
capitalism vs. communism. Although the latter lost the epic battle in
the last quarter of the 20th century but left several innovative ideas for
the socio-political reengineering of the societies and their economic
management. These ideas are still the stuff of debates at social and
intellectual levels, whether ‘History’ has ended or not.
Thus, there are two clear nexuses in the Middle East, one comprising
Russia, Iran, and Syria, and the other consisting of Saudi Arabia,
Israel, and Turkey, jostling for power in the region. These conflicts
have turned the Middle East into a playground where the global
powers are using the politically non-representative regimes as pawns
and Israel as the bully or regional policeman to secure their permanent
interests.
Conclusion
The Middle East has been a troubled region for centuries, and it will
remain so for the foreseeable future because of the structural fault lines
and the resulting conflicts discussed above. Almost all the countries in
the region have alliances of convenience among themselves that,
interestingly, cut across their respective stands on one issue or
another. If one country is backing a group in one conflict, she opposes
it in another, and so on.
This has created an ideal situation for footloose mercenaries and even
outright criminal gangs to operate with impunity for their vested
interests. In such a complex situation, there are no simple solutions.
Introduction
During his time in the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, he had the
privilege of meeting his mentor, Sheikh Abu Tahir bin Ibrahim, a
distinguished scholar known for his deep understanding of Islamic
jurisprudence, theology, and spirituality. Shah Waliullah’s exposure to
the broader Islamic world and the teachings of his mentor had a
profound impact on his worldview. He became deeply concerned about
the decline of Islamic knowledge and spirituality in the Indian
subcontinent, coupled with the political turmoil of the time.
Political Environment:
5. European Colonialism
4. Educational Reform
7. Socio-cultural Reforms
Shah Waliullah advocated for the reform of Muslim society and the
revival of Islamic principles. He emphasized the need for Muslims to
adhere to the true teachings of Islam and to reject any practices that
deviated from its core principles. He highlighted the significance of
ethical conduct, piety, and righteousness in individuals and society at
large. His teachings aimed to address social ills and promote a just and
harmonious society based on Islamic values.
8. Political Engagement
Critique
Conclusion
From the 1526 War of Panipat until its dissolution in 1857, the Mughal
Empire was one of the largest empires in the world. Covering more
than a million square kilometers, the empire stretched from the outer
fringes of the Indus basin in the west, northern Afghanistan in the
northwest, Kashmir in the north, Bangladesh in the east, and the
uplands of the Deccan Plateau in South India. Its population numbered
more than 100 million, consisting of 100 distinct nationalities.
Most scholars hold Aurangzeb responsible for the ultimate decline and
collapse of the Mughal Empire. To them, it was his 20-year-long
campaign to crush the Deccan states that led to the depletion of
resources, and his long absence from the headquarters resulted in
weakening the writ of the state. He was, they maintain, trying to do too
much in too short a time and badly mishandling it. However, it is not
true, as the Mughal Empire was already falling apart at the seams.
None could have done anything to stop this decline. History will always
remember Aurangzeb for his last-ditch efforts to preserve Muslim rule
in India.
2. Succession Wars
The Mughal Empire, like any other power in history, was created by
power and must keep on improving its military muscle to sustain itself.
The Mughal Empire forgot this fundamental law of history. The
military, with which the earlier strong rulers carried on the conquest
and extended the empire, had now become demoralized and
inefficient. There was a lack of discipline, cohesion, patriotism, and
ignorance in modern military warfare in the army. The military was
also divided on a religious, linguistic, and ethnic basis. Thus, in the
final showdown, the British proved to be formidable foes, largely due
to their superior weapons, training, and strategy, which play a decisive
role in any military contest. The very Enfield rifle that the rebels had
refused to operate became their nemesis for its accuracy.
Although India used to produce 25% of the world’s GDP in the 1600s,
more than 80% of her income was produced by the agricultural sector.
Her growing population ensured that there was enough supply of
labour force, obviating the necessity to use machines in agricultural
operations or their
The king and sultans like Altutmash. Balban, and Alauddin Khilji.
Muhammad Tughluq, Sikandar Lodhi, Babar, Akbar, and Aurangzeb,
were competent, hardworking, and intelligent people, who were well
aware, of the art of smooth sailing in government. The remaining
rulers were neither competent nor of the highest character. The
courtiers and the nobles of the Mughal rulers of the 17th and 18th
centuries were not men of character and were divided on an ethnic and
linguistic basis.
6. Rise of Marhattas
8. Foreign Invasions
The attacks of Nadir Shah and Ahmed Shah were a fatal blow to the
Mughal authority and resulted in the rise of regional powers and the
deterioration of the central authority. Deccan, Orissa, Oudh, Bengal,
Bihar, etc., all declared their independence. Unfortunately, the Muslim
rulers neglected the importance of educational institutions. When
Europe was being illuminated by the Renaissance movement,
establishing universities, hospitals and welfare institutions, our rulers
were indulged in making gardens, palaces and palace intrigues
Paul Kennedy, in his book about the reasons for the fall of the great
powers, maintains that the great powers start declining when they
overstretch themselves. It fits perfectly in this case; the Mughal Empire
had stretched itself too much but did not have enough resources to
cover the costs of this imperial burden. It had 100 distinct nationalities
and nations under its fold, all aspiring for independent status on a
different basis. Once the Deccan states gave Aurangzeb a tough time, it
was an unstoppable process. State after state started asserting their
independence. Deccan, Orissa, Oudh, Bengal, Bihar, etc., all declared
their independence.
Conclusion
Aurang Zeb was the last Mughal emperor and the last effective Muslim
ruler of India; When he died, chaos interrupted his empire, and a war
of succession among his descendants proved disastrous to Mughal
glory. The invasion of Ahmed Shah Abdali, during the reign of
Muhammad Shah, proved fatal for the crumbling Mughal Empire.
Bahadur Shah, the last Mughal Emperor, was merely a titular head, a
pensioner of the East India Company. The 1857 War of Independence
resulted in the formal end of the Muslim Empire, and the East India
Company took control of the subcontinent.
Causes of the 1857 War of
Independence
Introduction
“The decline and fall of empires are not affairs of greased cartridges.
Such results are occasioned by adequate causes, and by an
accumulation of adequate causes.”
C. Religious Tensions
D. Social Discontent
E. Political Tensions
The occupation of India by the East India Company was not for any
altruistic motives, but rather for pure mercantilist objectives. It was
exploitative imperialism, pauperizing the colonies for the benefit of the
centre. This exploitation through fiscal, monetary, and commercial
policies, transferred huge resources from India, leaving every section of
society economically frustrated.
2. Increasing Unemployment
After gaining the right to collect revenue in Bengal in 1765, the East
India Company became so rich that it stopped importing gold and
silver from Britain, which it had hitherto used to pay for goods shipped
back to Britain. It also utilized this income in waging wars against local
principalities, with the result that the money in circulation was greatly
diminished.
3. Inflationary Pressures
The East India Company had no constitutional legitimacy to rule India,
but they still enjoyed a certain degree of performance legitimacy for
ensuring law and order and some semblance of good governance in
contrast with the last days of the Mughal Empire. However,
inflationary pressures started to emerge due to oppressive taxation
measures and crop failures. With high inflation, their legitimacy
started to dwindle.
4. Pauperized Peasantry
B. Military Unrest
The British Indian Army was the first and best institution the East
India Company introduced in India. A well-trained, well-equipped, and
well-paid Indian soldier, proud of being a servant of the Company
Bahadur, was the vanguard of British imperialism in the Subcontinent.
However, as the Company changed from a trading organisation to the
ruling elite, paradoxically, the soldier lost his importance over time,
adversely affecting his loyalty towards his employer. There were
several reasons for this alienation of a common shareholder of the
company:
While inflationary pressures had eroded the value of the local currency,
the pay and perks of the native soldiers were not increased accordingly.
At its peak, the Company had around 50,000 British officers and
soldiers in its armed forces against more than 280,000 Sepoys.
However, more than 50 % of the budget was allocated for the officers
and soldiers of European descent, while less than half of the budget
went to pay and perks for the native soldiers. In addition, the Bengal
Army was paid less than the Madras and Bombay Armies. Chances of
promotion for the native soldiers were always scant, but they became
bleak after the recruitment of British soldiers in greater numbers.
Many Indian officers could not hope to reach commissioned rank until
they were too old to be effective. In the armed forces, the higher ranks
were closed to Indians, who could only aspire to a salary of no more
than Rs. 60 after a lifetime of service. Another financial grievance
stemmed from the General Service Act, which denied retired Sepoys a
pension; While this applied only to recruits, it was suspected that it
would also apply to those already in service.
After the victory at the Battles of Plassey and Buxer, a large number of
soldiers were absorbed into the Bengal Army of the East India
Company. Suspecting their loyalty, the Company started recruiting
high-caste Rajputs and Brahmins and almost stopped the entry of
lower classes in some regiments. These high-caste soldiers used to
observe their traditional customs and rites very religiously, and any
infringement was protested by the members of these elite units.
Mangal Pandey, who first rebelled against one such infringement, was
from one of these elite units.
Not only among the elite units but even among the native soldiers,
there was also a common perception that the Company was
introducing rules and regulations that went against the religious
customs and beliefs of the Indian soldiers. Innovations in uniforms
that created resentment amongst both Hindu and Muslim Sepoys led
to the Vellore Mutiny in 1806. Similarly, orders suppressing the
wearing of caste marks on the forehead, earrings, or even beards were
interpreted as attempts to interfere with the faith of both Hindus and
Muslims. The General Service Enlistment Act of 1856, requiring an
oath from everyone to serve even outside of India, greatly demoralised
the Hindu soldiers, who were averse to sea travel for religious reasons.
4. Communication Gap
5. Severity of Punishment
The use of European draconian punishments to suppress any
resentment by the Indian soldiers was one of the main reasons for the
1857 Uprising Expressions of open resentment by the Sepoys had
always been treated leniently in the old Mughal/state armies because
the Indian soldier, however poor he might have been, regarded himself
as a gentleman, and that was how the rest of society looked at him. In
Europe, soldiers came from working classes for which harsh
punishments were necessary and were considered normal. The 1857
Uprising was not the first of its kind. The “White Mutiny” of European
soldiers in the East India Company’s Forces in 1808, which resulted in
the massacre not of the European mutineers but of the Indian soldiers
they led, was one such example. However, each such act of ferocity left
its mark on the soldier’s subconscious memories.
6. Overseas Journeys
7. Loss of Privileges
With the annexation of the native states, the Company increased its
areas of jurisdiction and revenue, but its Sepoys discovered that they
had also lost their privileged status. Before the annexation, these
soldiers had the right to demand the residents’ intervention on their
behalf in the domestic problems of their families vis-à-vis the state
administration. Similarly, the annexation of Punjab and Sindh resulted
in the discontinuation of Bhatta (extra ration) for the Sepoys, who used
to get this additional perk for serving in these foreign lands.
8. Cartridge Controversy
The last straw on the camel’s back was the widespread rumours that
the cartridges of the new Enfield rifle were encased in paper greased
with the fat of cows and pigs — offensive equally to Hindus and
Muslims. The prescribed drill for loading the new rifle required the end
of the cartridge to be bitten off by the soldiers, an act that would
effectively pollute their faith. The whole purpose, according to the
rumour, was that the polluted Sepoys should be left with no option but
to embrace the Christian faith.
Not only were the Sepoys and the social, economic, and political elite of
India feeling alienated due to the highhandedness of the East India
Company, but even the common man also had grudges of his own
against them for one reason or another. Some of these reasons were
The last Mughal King, though a mere figurehead, and with all his
weaknesses and diminished position, was still a symbol of what India
stood for before the British came. Over time, British Residents
stationed in Delhi stopped paying him due respect and sometimes,
even showed him overt disrespect. Lord Dalhousie, the Governor-
General of India, had asked the Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah Zafar
and his successors to leave the Red Fort, the palace in Delhi. Later,
Lord Canning, the next Governor-General of India, announced in 1856
that Bahadur Shah’s successors would not even be allowed to use the
title “king’. In a close and traditional society like Delhi, such
discourtesies were taken as a personal slight by every Indian who
considered the Mughal King as the symbol of Indian pride
If the Mughal King was not given proper respect, the nobility was
subjected to greater ignominy. Not only did they become unemployed
after the confiscation of their lands and property, but they were also
reduced in social esteem and felt humiliated in the public eye. They
became an object of ridicule in common parlance after the confiscation
of their perks and privileges as a result of the loss of government
offices.
Another reason for general dissatisfaction with British rule was the
introduction of the European civil and criminal justice systems. In
place of a simple, direct, and fairly informal administration of justice,
the new system was a highly formalized court procedure dependent on
the pleader’s ability to present his case. In a highly illiterate society, it
was the biggest cause of frustration among the people.
4. Introduction of Technology
D. Religious Discontent
1. Doctrine of Lapse
2. Colonial Arrogance
3. Reward-less Titles
In the Mughal period and even before that, the nobility in India was
awarded titles along with monetary rewards and land grants for the
services rendered to the rulers. The East India Company replaced those
with titles like Khan Bahadur, Rao Sahib, and the like, which were
purely decorative honorifics given to rich gentlemen who possessed the
means to support these dignitaries and were usually awarded for
services of a political nature. The idea of a titled aristocracy, divorced
from functional office, was novel to India and did little to enhance the
prestige of either the recipients or the givers.
Course and Events of the
1857 War of Independence
Introduction
The Simmering:
Mangal Pandey tried to incite his comrades into an open and active
rebellion; after failing to achieve his objective, he tried to commit
suicide but did not succeed. He was court-martialed on April 6 and
hanged after two days. Jemadar Ishwari Prasad, too, was sentenced
to death and hanged on April 22. The whole regiment was
disbanded.
The Revolt:
The Rebellion:
When the 11th and 20th native cavalry of the Bengal Army
assembled in Meerut on May 10, they broke rank and turned on
their commanding officers. They then liberated the 3rd Regiment
and attacked the European cantonment, where they are reported to
have killed all the Europeans they could find, including women and
children, and burned their houses. The rebellious forces were then
engaged by the remaining British forces in Meerut, which had the
largest percentage of British troops of any station in India, i.e.,
2,038 European troops with 12 field guns versus 2,357 Sepoys,
lacking artillery.
The War:
Over the next few months, the revolt took the shape of a full-fledged
war in much of north-central India, where people started pitching
battles with the British army. It turned into an all-out popular revolt
that enveloped all classes of the population. Due to the paucity of
British troops throughout the region, the Company forces found it
difficult to suppress these outbreaks and had to struggle hard to
control or stop the progress of the revolt.
After taking Delhi, on May 30, rebel forces laid siege to the British
garrison at Lucknow, home to nearly five hundred British women
and children. In late June, they forced the surrender of the small
British garrison in nearby Kanpur (Cawnpore). Although the terms
of surrender had promised the British population free passage to
Allahabad, three hundred fifty men of the garrison were murdered
near the Ganges River, and a week later, one hundred twenty-five
women and children were also killed, and their bodies were thrown
into a well.
The Counterstroke:
The End:
Although the rebellion was over by the end of 1857, there were some
pockets of resistance that prolonged the formal end of the war. The
last rebels were defeated in Gwalior on June 20, 1858. On July 8,
1858, a peace treaty was signed, and the war ended. Rebel leaders
Bakht Khan and Nana Sahib were never heard of again; probably
both had been slain while fleeing.
The Retribution:
The end of the war was followed by the usual retribution, whose
graphic descriptions are now available in some of the books written
on this issue. There were four cardinal principles, religiously
followed while meting out the punishment;
The movement could not succeed in achieving any of its objectives due
to the following reasons.
Although the ground was ripe for such an eventuality, the uprising
itself was a spontaneous and, hence, unplanned act. According to
Malleson and Wilson, the revolutionaries had planned to start the War
throughout the country on May 31, 1857. However, the cartridge
incident resulted in its premature outbreak. It was doomed to fail right
from the start because of this lack of vision, strategy, and planning on
the part of the rebel forces.
Leadership Failures
The lack of strong political and capable military leadership played the
most crucial role in this fiasco. The rebellious forces selected a dying,
frail old man as their political leader, who had no desire to play the
role. He was neither a brave general nor an astute leader of the people.
The same was the case with the military leadership of the rebels, which
was no match for the brilliant British leadership. On top of it was the
nonexistence of any well-managed, centralised command and control
system that could provide the proper guidance and plan to the rebel
forces.
As luck would have it, the main arsenal of the rebels in Delhi was
destroyed in a fire, either accidentally or by the traitors, leaving the
defending forces with a limited quantity of ammunition. Attempts by
the rebels to collect modern equipment from Russia failed, as their
one-member delegation (Rao Tularam) sent to Russia for this purpose
died on the way.
Internal Rifts
After the euphoria of the initial revolt was over, inter-communal, inter-
racial, and inter-regional rifts started among the rebels. The battle cry
of the Muslims to wage Jihad became anathema for the Hindus. Many
Indians supported the British, due to their dislike of the idea of the
return of Mughal rule. Durbar intrigues and personal rivalries
precluded any common strategy of war.
The role played by the favourite wife of the Mughal King, Zeenat
Mahal, was quite dubious. The same was the case concerning the
loyalty of several of his confidants, particularly Ahsanullah Khan. In
Awadh, Sunni Muslims, perceiving it to be a Shia rebellion, refused to
join it as they did not want to see a return to Shiite rule. Instead, they
declared war against the rebels and chose Haji Imdadullah as their
Ameer. Ironically, only a few months ago, Haji Imdadullah had led the
Sunni forces against the British in the famous Battle of Shamli.
Desperate Fight
The British were fighting with their backs against the wall because they
knew there was no option for them. It was a do-or-die situation for
them. Once the British got a foothold, they mustered all their resources
and made a big assault on Delhi with full force.
Lack of Response
Only three other big cities rebelled, with the result that the British
didn’t have to fight on different fronts. If the rebels had been successful
in getting similar revolts and uprisings in a dozen cities across the
country, the situation would have been different. Most of southern
India remained passive, with only sporadic and haphazard outbreaks
of violence. Most of the states did not take part in the war, as many
parts of the region were ruled by the Nizams or the Mysore royalty and
were thus not directly under British rule.
Local Support
Unequal Fight
1. Preservation of Islam
After the fall of the Mughal Empire in the aftermath of the 1857 War of
Independence, Islam as an institution came under attack from two
sources: the British rulers and the Hindu revivalists. Both considered
Islam more dangerous than the Indian Muslims and tried to banish it
from India. One of the most lethal attacks came in the form of the
abolition of their financial grants. In these dark days, it was these
religious leaders who took up the mantle of Islam and saved it from
elimination by British India.
Remember, if these ulema had not defended Islam the way they did,
Islam would have faced the same fate as so many other creeds like
Jainism and Buddhism. Km Pannikar, a great analyst and security
advisor to Nehru, has rightly pointed out that, unlike other religions
that came to India and fitted in horizontally, Islam survived because it
kept on standing vertically. If there had been no Islam, there would
have been no Muslims, and hence no Pakistan.
4. Reformist Movements
6. Socio-Political Awakening
Ulema’s support for the Pakistan Movement came in the form of the
New Medina construct, which was formulated by the Barelvis and a
section of the Deobandi clergy. In its election campaign in 1946, the
Muslim League drew upon the support of Islamic scholars and Sufis
with the rallying cry of “Islam in danger”. The majority of Barelvis
supported the creation of Pakistan, and Barelvi ulama issued fatwas in
support of the Muslim League. In contrast, most Deobandi ulama (led
by Maulana Husain Ahmad Madani) opposed the creation of Pakistan
and the two-nation theory. Maulana Husain Ahmad Madani and the
Deobandis advocated composite nationalism, according to which
Muslims and Hindus were one nation. Madani differentiated between
“qaum”, which meant a multi-religious nation, and “millat” which was
exclusively the social unity of Muslims.
Conclusion
Born into a scholarly and affluent family in Delhi in 1817, Sir Syed
Ahmed Khan was raised in an environment steeped in Islamic
teachings and cultural traditions. His family had a long history of
service to the Mughal courts, which provided him with exposure to
Persian and Arabic languages, as well as Islamic literature. This
upbringing deeply influenced his intellectual inclinations and religious
beliefs. However, his outlook was not confined to religious dogma; he
possessed a progressive mindset that sought to reconcile Islamic
teachings with modern knowledge and scientific advancements.
After completing his early education, Sir Syed joined the British East
India Company’s civil service in 1838. His tenure as a civil servant
exposed him to British administrative and educational systems, and he
became acutely aware of the educational and socio-economic
disparities between the British and Indian communities. This
experience laid the foundation for his later efforts to bring about
educational reform among Indians, particularly Muslims.
Environment
The era in which Sir Syed Ahmed Khan lived and formulated his ideas
was marked by a complex social, economic, and political environment
in British India. This environment had a profound impact on his
thoughts and initiatives, which aimed to uplift the Muslim community
and bridge the gap between tradition and modernity.
Another significant factor that influenced Sir Syed’s ideas was the class
and sectarian disunity within the Muslim community. Muslims were
divided along various lines, such as religious sects, socio-economic
classes, and regional affiliations. This disunity weakened their
collective strength and hindered their ability to advocate for their
rights and interests effectively. Sir Syed recognized the urgent need for
unity among Muslims to address their shared challenges.
In this environment, Sir Syed Ahmed Khan realised that if the British
Indian Muslims did not accept the changed post-1857 environment
and respond adequately to the following challenges adequately, their
existence as a separate entity and their beliefs and practices would face
the same fate as the Spanish Muslims had faced nearly 500 years ago.
1. Socio-Political Marginalization
The aftermath of the 1857 rebellion had left British Indian Muslims
marginalized in the socio-political landscape. The loss of power,
coupled with a deep distrust of British rulers due to their perceived
harsh response to the rebellion, led to a sense of resentment among
Muslims. The ascendency of Hindus in the colonial administration and
public institutions further exacerbated these feelings. Muslims found
themselves at a disadvantage in terms of representation and influence,
prompting the need for strategic efforts to regain their political
relevance. Thus, there was a danger that soon the British Indian
Muslims would become an underclass in a country ruled by the British
in association with the Hindus.
1. Economic Disempowerment
Sir Syed emphasized the need for Muslim unity and strategic political
engagement. He advocated for Muslims to participate in
administrative and political roles under British rule, understanding
that this engagement was crucial for safeguarding their interests. He
believed that cooperation with the British administration would
provide Muslims with opportunities to influence policies that affected
their community directly.
Sir Syed understood that political confrontation with the British was
not a viable option. He advocated for Muslims to engage in a
constructive relationship with British rulers by participating in
administrative and governmental roles. This approach was aimed at
safeguarding the interests of Muslims and enabling them to influence
policies that directly affected their community. By aligning with the
British administration, Muslims could secure positions of authority
and contribute to the governance of the country.
Sir Syed believed that preserving the distinct identity of Muslims was
crucial for their socio-cultural integrity. He emphasized the need for
Muslims to take pride in their Islamic heritage while simultaneously
embracing modern education and values. He advocated for a balance
between religious identity and adaptability, encouraging Muslims to
maintain their cultural distinctiveness while participating in the
changing world. This approach aimed to foster a sense of unity and
pride among Muslims.
A. Ideas he Gave
Out of his numerous ideas, I can identify the following five as the most
crucial contributions of Sir Sayed Ahment Khan in many areas:
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan believed that language played a crucial role in
shaping the identity of a community. He championed the promotion of
the Urdu language as a unifying factor for Muslims. He saw Urdu as a
symbol of their cultural heritage and a means to transcend regional
and linguistic differences within the Muslim community. By
advocating for the preservation and propagation of Urdu, he aimed to
strengthen the sense of unity among Muslims and foster a distinct
identity for the community.
1. Institutions He Created
2. Institutions He Inspired
e. All India Muslim League: While founded after Sir Syed’s time,
the Muslim League embodied his idea of Muslims as a separate nation
with distinct interests. It eventually became the political vehicle for
Muslim representation.
C. Individuals he Inspired
Sir Syed’s approach to preserving Islam was not one of isolation but of
adaptation. His emphasis on reinterpreting Islamic teachings in the
light of modern circumstances showcased his belief that Islam’s core
values could coexist with modernity. By advocating critical thinking
and embracing scientific knowledge, he ensured that Islamic thought
remained relevant and in harmony with the contemporary world. His
writings and lectures bridged the gap between traditional Islamic
teachings and the advancements of the time, fostering a dynamic
Islamic discourse that continues to influence scholars and thinkers
today.
Sir Syed’s most notable contribution lay in charting a roadmap for the
survival and progress of British Indian Muslims in the face of
marginalization and socio-political challenges. Sir Sayed Ahmed Khan
authored a comprehensive book to pinpoint the real causes of the 1857
Rebellion and try to dispel the myth that it was the Indian Muslims
who were to blame for this revolt
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan recognized that education was vital for the
progress of Muslims in India. He emphasized the importance of
Western education alongside Islamic education. In 1875, he founded
the Muhammadan Anglo-Oriental College in Aligarh, which later
became the Aligarh Muslim University. This institution aimed to
provide modern education while preserving Islamic values. It played a
crucial role in producing a new generation of educated Muslim
professionals.
Sir Syed’s advocacy for practical morality and interfaith dialogue laid
the foundation for harmonious coexistence among religious
communities. His belief in the shared ethical values of different
religions contributed to an environment of tolerance and
understanding, essential for a diverse society like India.
6. Social Reforms
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan’s reforms extended beyond education. He
advocated for social and cultural changes that would help Muslims
adapt to the evolving socio-political landscape. He emphasized the
importance of rationality, scientific inquiry, and critical thinking
within the framework of Islamic teachings. He also promoted the
learning of English and other modern subjects to enhance
employability and socio-political participation. Sir Syed Ahmed Khan
emphasized the need for a rational and progressive interpretation of
Islam. He sought to dispel misconceptions and superstitions that
hindered Muslim progress. He advocated for reforms within the
Muslim community, encouraging critical thinking and a broader
understanding of Islamic teachings.
Conclusions
Sir Syed Ahmed Khan’s contributions laid the foundation for the
intellectual and educational revival of Muslims in India. His ideas and
efforts continue to shape the discourse on modern education, interfaith
dialogue, and social reforms within the Muslim community in India
and beyond.
Although the 1857 uprising was a common struggle among the Indians,
the ultimate blame for this event was laid on Muslim’s shoulders. They
were singled out, individually and collectively, by the English for
retribution, which ranged from personal persecution to outright denial
or limited access to economic opportunities, social esteem, and
political participation for two decades after the uprising.
Impact
Suppose the religious scholars teaching in the Madrassas were the ones
who saved Islam from its banishment from the Subcontinent in the
period following the 1857 Rebellion. In that case, saving Indian
Muslims from extreme persecution at the hands of the British is due to
the leaders and workers produced by the Aligarh Movement.
It is anybody’s guess what would have happened to the Indian Muslims
if visionaries like Sir Sayed Ahmed Khan and his colleagues had not
come forward to build bridges between them. On the other hand, they
convinced the British about the good wishes of the Indian Muslims,
and they also tried their best to ensure the mainstreaming of the
Indian Muslims by persuading them to learn Western education
2. Multi-dimensional Impact
3. Geographical Spread
4. Khilafat Movement
The Khilafat Movement was the first mass mobilisation of the Indian
people for their political rights. And who were the people who
launched, and steered this movement—students and alumni of Aligarh
University!
5. Pakistan Movement
Pakistan owes its creation to multiple factors, but the main credit must
be given to those hundreds and thousands of old students of Aligarh
University who spread in every nook and corner of British India to
create consumers about Pakistan and a support base. And who was
leading this campaign? The majority were associated with Aligarh in
one form or another. That is why Quaid-e-Azam used to spend so much
time with the students of Aligarh University.
Partition of Bengal:
Significance in Pakistan
Movement
Introduction
Announced on July 19, 1905, the Partition of Bengal was the territorial
reorganization of the Bengal Presidency of British India by Lord
Curzon, the then Viceroy of India. While partitioning Bengal into two
new provinces of manageable size — East and West Bengal—Lord
Curzon, known for administrative efficiency, was not specifically
aiming to divide Hindus from Muslims. However, it so happened that
the new province of East Bengal, with a population of thirty million
and Dacca as its capital, became a Muslim-majority province. On the
other hand, West Bengal with a population of 54 million and Calcutta
as its capital, turned out to be a Hindu-majority province
Muslims’ Response
Hindus Response
While the Bengali Muslims overwhelmingly supported the partition
plan, the Hindus opposed the move tooth and nail for multiple
reasons.
There were several reasons why the British were forced to retract their
plan.
Consequences
Like any momentous event, the Partition of Bengal and its subsequent
annulment had a far-reaching impact on the political landscape of
British India
Context
But this system proved futile, as from 1892 to 1906, not even a single
Muslim representative could secure a seat in the legislative councils, as
the local bodies were also dominated by Hindus, who always voted on
religious grounds. The British Indian Muslim elite was becoming
acutely conscious of this political marginalization of their community
in the new political governance system being introduced by the British
colonialists and was thinking of creating a political organization of
their own.
Although the 1857 uprising was a common struggle among the Indians,
with Hindus playing equally, if not more, than their Muslim
compatriots, it was the British Indian Muslims who were singled out,
individually and collectively, by the English for retribution. This
blatant discrimination against Indian Muslims inevitably resulted in
the creation of three types of classes, each a trendblazer:
Islamists: Islamists, who ascribed the fall of the Mughal Empire to
the Muslims' deviation from their religion, advised aloofness from
mainstream social and political life to Muslims and tried to revive the
old Islamic spirit of jihad through religious education.
Moderates: Moderates who thought that the British were here to stay
for long innings and the violent overthrow was impossible. They,
therefore, advocated the acquisition of modern Western knowledge
and stressed cooperation with the British to safeguard their rights.
Fearing that the first group, namely Islamists, might take over the
leadership of the Indian Muslims using the religious card, the British
encouraged the other two groups to come forward and lead the
Muslims. The Simla Delegation was the start of this policy of inducting
Muslim moderates into the political stream in the same way they had
done with the Hindus by forming the Indian National Congress.
The 1857 War of Independence led to several trends, of which three are
the most important: Indian nationalism, Indian Muslim separatism,
and its offshoot, Bengali Muslim separatism
· Indian Nationalism: While the Indian Muslims were still in a shell
shock after the 1857 War and the revenge taken by the British, the
Hindu population seized the initiative, became more educated, and
gained lucrative positions in the Indian Civil Service: many ascended to
influential posts in the British government. This economic
empowerment of Hindus led to their collective consciousness of being
the true inheritors of Indian civilization, which led to their intensive
Indianization.
While the Indian Hindus got their own political party, namely the
Indian National Congress, the British Indian Muslims realized the
need for a similar organization to safeguard their national interests.
4. Partisan Attitude of Indian National Congress
The turning point came in the summer of 1906, during John Morley’s
budget speech, in which he hinted at constitutional reforms. At that
time, Muslims did not have a political platform to demand their share.
It was reasserted that they wanted a separate political platform.
The Shimla Delegation was the first formal effort by the Indian Muslim
elite to safeguard the interests of their community by presenting their
demands to the highest authority in British India. It became essential
for Muslims to establish a political party of their own when Minto
offered the fullest sympathy to Muslim demands. The success of the
delegation compelled the Muslims to have a separate political
association of their own.
Course
The first session of the all-India Muslim League was held in Karachi on
December 29, 1907, and was presided over by Adamji Peer Bhai.
It was felt from the beginning that the All-India Muslim League would
not achieve considerable success without winning the British public's
support. Therefore, Syed Ameer Ali organized the branch of the
Muslim League in London.
Impact
The Indian National Congress (INC) was formed in 1885 with the aim
of seeking political rights and representation for Indians under British
colonial rule. Similarly, the All India Muslim League was the first
formally organized political platform representing the geographical
and cross-sectional representation of the British Indian Muslims to
articulate the demands of the British Muslims and present them to the
higher authorities as a sole representative. Because of its high-profile
leadership and mass following, it was difficult for the British
Government, British Indian Government, India, and other parties to
ignore the demands they were making
3. Leadership Funnel
Like any other political party, the Muslim League was instrumental in
the political socialization of the British Indian Muslims as well as in
recruiting and training the political leadership for the running of a
state. It was the Muslim League that helped produce the bulk of the
leadership, which not only created Pakistan but also helped steer the
new country after its formation.
Shimla Deputation:
Genesis and Significance
Introduction
Context
But this system proved totally futile, as from 1892 to 1906, not even a
single Muslim representative could secure a seat in the legislative
councils, as the local bodies were also dominated by Hindus, who
always voted on religious grounds.
Simla Delegation was the first formal effort by the Indian Muslim elite
to safeguard the interests of their community by presenting their
demands to the highest authority in British India
Although the 1857 uprising was a common struggle among the Indians,
with Hindus playing an equal, if not greater, role in toppling the
government than their Muslim compatriots, the ultimate blame for this
event was put on Muslim’s shoulders. They were singled out,
individually and collectively, by the English for retribution. This
blatant discrimination against Indian Muslims inevitably resulted in
the creation of three types of classes, each a trendblazer:
a. Islamists: Islamists, who ascribed the fall of the Mughal Empire to
the Muslims' deviation from their religion, advised aloofness from
mainstream social and political life for Muslims and tried to revive the
old Islamic spirit of jihad through religious education.
Fearing that the first group, namely Islamists, might take over the
leadership of the Indian Muslims using the religious card, the British
encouraged the other two groups to come forward and lead the
Muslims.
The Simla Delegation was the start of this policy of inducting Muslim
moderates into the political stream in the same way they had done with
the Hindus by forming the Indian National Congress.
The Shimla Deputation, led by Aga Khan and other Muslim leaders,
met with Viceroy Lord Minto on October 6, 1905, and presented a set
of demands. The demands centred around protecting the interests and
political representation of the Muslim community in the changing
political landscape of British India. The key demands made by the
Shimla Deputation were:
1. For the first time, the Hindu-Muslim conflict was lifted to the
constitutional plane. The rift in society was now to be
translated into legal and political institutions.
2. The Muslims had made it clear that they had no confidence in
the Hindu majority, and that they were not prepared to put
their future in the hands of assemblies elected on the
assumption of a homogeneous Indian nation. By implication,
they rejected the idea of a single Indian nation on the grounds
that the minority could not trust the majority.
3. From this, it was but a short step to demanding a separate
state for the Muslims of India In this sense, the beginnings of
separate electorates may be seen as the glimmerings of the
two-nation theory. The significance of the Shimla demand lay
in the reservations that the Muslims had about their Indian
nationality
Minto-Morley Reforms of
1909: Genesis and
Significance
Introduction
Context
By the early 20th century, Indian nationalism and demands for self-
governance were gaining momentum. The British government
recognized the need to accommodate Indian aspirations while
maintaining British control. The INC and other political organizations
had been pushing for political representation and participation in
governance. The Muslim League, formed in 1906, also demanded
safeguards for Muslim interests.
Course
Consequences
Conclusion
Context
1. Self-government in India.
2. Abolition of the Indian Council.
3. Separation of the executive from the judiciary.
4. Salaries of the Secretary of State for Indian Affairs are to be
paid from British coffers and not Indian funds.
5. 1/3rd representation to be given to Muslims in the Central
Government.
6. The number of Muslims in the provincial legislatures is to be
laid down for each province.
7. Separate electorates for all communities until a joint
electorate is demanded by all.
8. Introduction of a system of weightage for minority
representation (it implied giving minorities more
representation than their share in the population).
9. Increasing the term of the Legislative Council to 5 years.
10. Half the members of the Imperial Legislative Council were
Indians.
11.All elected members are to be elected directly based on the
adult franchise. 4/5ths of the members of the provincial
legislatures are to be elected and 1/5th to be nominated.
12. Members of the Legislative Council elect their President
themselves.
Montague Chelmsford
Reforms, 1919
Introduction
Context
Significance
Conclusion
Context
The institution of the Caliphate has always been an emotional issue for
every Muslim throughout history. Being the caliph, the Ottoman sultan
was nominally the supreme religious and political leader of all Sunni
Muslims across the world.
2. Revolutionary Ideas
In 1920, they published the Khilafat Manifesto, which called upon the
British to protect the caliphate and for Indian Muslims to unite and
hold the British accountable for this purpose. The Khilafat Movement
had the following stated objectives to achieve:
Khilafat leaders such as Dr. Ansari, Maulana Azad, and Hakim Ajmal
Khan also grew personally close to Gandhi. These leaders founded the
Jamia Millia Islamia in 1920 to promote independent education and
social rejuvenation for Muslims.
Consequences
Conclusion
Context
Significance
Conclusion
Context
Although the British came to India as a colonial power, they always had
the view that one day they would have to leave it and wanted to leave a
lasting legacy. One of the legacies they wanted to leave was the British
form of representative government. Thus, soon after assuming direct
rule, the British Government began introducing piecemeal
constitutional reforms. The time had come to increase the range of
these reforms
The British government had realized that it was not possible to hold on
to their British Indian Empire indefinitely and was thus seriously
considering granting them some sort of dominion status. Even a
substantial portion of the intellectual elite in the UK believed that India
needed to move towards dominion status.
Leaders of both parties, namely the Congress and Muslim League, had
presented their respective points of view about the future
constitutional setup of India in the Nehru Report and the 14 points of
Mohammed Ali Jinnah. Although these reports differed in many ways,
they provided an excellent working template to discuss the differences
and find common ground
Course
Consequences
Conclusion
The Round Table Conferences were pivotal in shaping the discourse
around India’s self-governance and constitutional reforms. They
provided a platform for dialogue, highlighted the diversity of Indian
voices, and set the stage for further negotiations that eventually
culminated in the realization of India’s independence.
Introduction
On the other hand, some people politically misuse it and equate it with
the Two Nations Theory, which was the basis of the creation of
Pakistan, while others bracket it with Islamic Ideology. They fail to
understand that all these three concepts, namely Two Nations Theory,
Pakistan Ideology, and Islamic Ideology, are interrelated but distinct in
their application, as explained in the article later.
What is an Ideology?
It is, thus, a neutral term, meaning any idea that unites a nation,
providing its citizens with a worldview and a vision along with a set of
rules for leading their lives. In that sense, Pakistan, like every country,
has an ideology, a set of ideas about its reason to be, its dreams, and
the way it likes its society, politics, and economy to work.
Historical Background
To press for their demands, they used the term Two Nations Theory,
which provided them with a moral narrative and political justification
for the geographical division of India based on the claims of the
Muslims of India as being a separate nation, not a community, and
hence entitled to have a separate state.
Interestingly, it was their last option, not the first choice, as is evident
from the acceptance of the Cabinet Mission Plan by the Muslim League
when a last-ditch effort was made by the British to leave a united India
as their legacy
Need for Pakistan Ideology?
After the creation of Pakistan, this battle cry lost its relevance as there
were no longer two nations in Pakistan as everyone, whether a Hindu,
Christian, or Muslim, was a Pakistani. This was very eloquently
explained by the founder of Pakistan in his famous August 11th speech
in the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan. There was, thus, a need for a
new political narrative for two reasons.
A. Islamic Moorings
Islam, which was used as a battle cry for the creation of Pakistan, is the
bedrock of Pakistan’s Ideology. As Islam prescribes a complete code of
life for Muslims, including their personal lives, guidance for social
relations, economic ethics, and political conduct, Pakistan’s ideology
draws heavily from this source. It also provides them with a world view
and norms of behaviour toward other countries.
The vision given by the founding fathers during the freedom struggle
and after its successful completion is the second source of Pakistan’s
Ideology. They certainly wanted the country to be guided by Islamic
principles, but they never wanted it to be a theocracy run by some
mullahs asserting their right to rule under divine authority. In this
connection, the views expressed by the founder of Pakistan in his
interview with Reuters in 1946 serve as the guiding principles of
Pakistan’s ideology.
Similarly, Khan Liaquat Ali Khan, the first Prime Minister of Pakistan,
clearly stated:
“The investment of power in the people eliminated any danger of the
establishment of a theocracy. Many persons who use the word
theocracy in the same breath as the polity of Pakistan are either
labouring under a grave misapprehension or indulging in
mischievous propaganda.”
C. Constitutional Obligations
D. Global Commitments
1. Islamic Identity
3. Unity in Diversity
One of the most prominent features of Pakistan’s Ideology is its firm
belief in unity in diversity. Every modern nation-state is a multi-ethnic,
multi-religious entity with different markers for its identification.
Pakistan is home to over 15 major ethnic groups that differ in physical
features, customs, dress, food, music, etc. It is a melting pot of South
Asian, Central Asian, Western Asian, Middle Eastern, and European
influences brought about by foreign invasions and trade relations.
5. Quality of Life
6. National Cohesion
“Now I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal, and you
will find that in the course of time, Hindus will cease to be Hindus and
Muslims will cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense because
that is the personal faith of the individual, but in the political sense as
citizens of the state.”
It strives to mainstream marginalized sections and disgruntled
elements of society by ensuring good governance at different levels of
interaction and taking affirmative action on a selective basis where
needed
7. Peaceful Coexistence
“Our foreign policy is one of friendliness and goodwill towards all the
nations of the world. We do not cherish aggressive designs against
any country or nation. We believe in the principles of honesty and
fair play in national and international dealings and are prepared to
make our utmost contribution to the promotion of peace and
prosperity among the nations of the world. Pakistan will never be
found lacking in extending its material and moral support to the
oppressed and suppressed peoples of the world, and in upholding the
principles of the United Nations Charter.”
8. Democratic Governance
Pakistan owes its creation to a democratic struggle, and as such, liberal
democracy as envisioned by its founding fathers is one of the most
important pillars of Pakistan’s Ideology. It strengthens the democratic
dividends by promoting a true political culture (of tolerance and
accommodation), strengthening its democratic structures (of
parliaments, and election commissions), and letting the various
democratic processes (of holding elections at federal, provincial, and
local levels) continue uninterruptedly.
Conclusion
Introduction
Two-Nation Theory:
Genesis and Evolution
What is the Two-Nation Theory?
The Two-Nation Theory is one of the most central drivers of the history
of the Sub-continent in general and of the Pakistan movement in
particular. Its three most important roles are
It played a pivotal role in the demand for the partition of India, arguing
that the creation of a separate Muslim-majority state, later known as
Pakistan, was essential to address the perceived injustices and
insecurities faced by Muslims under a Hindu-dominated political
framework. The Two-Nation Theory was one of the formulas used to
find a solution for the peaceful dissolution of the vast but crumbling
British Indian Empire in the 1940s.
It suggested that the Hindus and Muslims of India were two separate
nations based on their respective cultural markers, particularly their
religious beliefs, and practices. Hence, as per the principle of self-
determination, they needed separate states where they could practice
their religion freely and shape their socio-political destiny according to
Islamic principles.
The Two-Nation Theory entered its third and final stage in 1930 with
the famous Allahabad address delivered by Allama Iqbal, demanding
the creation of separate states for the British Indian Muslims. It was
reinforced by the publication of Ch. Rehmat Ali’s pamphlet, delineated
the boundaries and names of the envisioned new states for British
Indian Muslims. These demands were solidified and put forth during
the Lahore Resolution, and the Theory attained its ultimate triumph
with the establishment of a separate state of Pakistan in 1947.
Mainsprings of the Two-nation Theory
Out of the multiple social, economic, and political factors shaping this
theory, we can identify the following as the mainsprings of the Two-
Nation Theory:
The early 20th century saw the rise of Indian nationalism, with the
Indian National Congress at the forefront of the independence
movement. However, the perception among some Muslims that their
interests were not adequately represented within the Indian National
Congress led to concerns about their future in a Hindu-majority-
independent India.
Prominent figures like Sir Sayed Ahmed Khan, Allama Iqbal, and
Muhammad Ali Jinnah played pivotal roles in formulating and
popularizing the Two-Nation Theory. Allama Iqbal’s speeches and
writings emphasized the distinct identity of Muslims in India, while
Jinnah, as the leader of the All India Muslim League, became a
prominent advocate for the demand for a separate Muslim nation.
F. Global Developments
At the same time, the 1917 Russian Revolution created feelings of mass
empowerment Similarly, near home, a successful revolt led by Dr. Sun
Yat-sen in China during the 1920s was an inspiration for the
nationalists in India. His achievements were recognized and admired
not only by the local and overseas Chinese but also by the global
community
Conclusion
Hindus and Muslims in British India were two separate nations based
on their respective cultural markers, particularly their religious beliefs
and practices. They, therefore, needed their respective separate
geographical spaces where they could live their lives accordingly.
Pakistan has done impressively despite all the handicaps and external
shocks to maintain a fairly consistent rate of growth throughout its 70
years of existence as an independent state. However, this rate has not
been as impressive as it should have been, keeping in mind its
potential in terms of its geo-economic location, resources, and
opportunities. Secondly, this rate has not been consistent throughout;
high rates are followed by depression in the next year, and so on. One
of the main reasons for this lopsided development has been the speed,
scope, and style of her industrial development
With the current rate of economic growth of around 3% over the past
several years, it will not be possible to absorb this rising labour force.
The already overburdened public sector can only absorb a fraction of
this increase in the increased labour force. On the other hand, the large
industrial houses in the private sector have neither the expertise nor
the incentive to upgrade their enterprises. The small and medium-scale
enterprises have more life in them, but, given their size and lack of
finance, they have also not been able to modernize.
The same is the case with Pakistan’s export performance; it has been
lacklustre and far below its potential, constituting a meagre 0.15% of
total world exports. Pakistan’s export profile is a mixed bag in terms of
volume, composition, destination, and growth rates. No doubt, its
exports have increased from 15.43 billion US dollars in 2005 to 25.45
billion US $ in 2019, depicting an annual growth rate of around 6–7%
per year. However, these growth rates are far below their potential, and
have not been consistent over this period; extraordinary growth in one
year has been followed by a paltry increase next year, and so on.
4. Neglecting Agriculture:
All over the world, it is the agricultural revolution that has preceded
the industrial revolution and not vice versa. Agriculture is a vital sector
that provides both a market and raw materials for the industrial sector.
Neglecting agriculture has resulted in missed opportunities for
industrial growth, as a thriving agricultural sector can fuel agro-
processing industries and provide a stable domestic market.
5. Lack of FDI:
Response
The best strategy for rapid industrialisation and consequent export
promotion entails reinforcing Pakistan’s existing strength in those
sectors that are already exporting. These should be supplemented by
creating the basis for establishing a new competitive advantage. It will
not only increase the quantity of our industrial products but also
expand their range to be used domestically as well as export higher
value-added goods. For this purpose, it must address the following
broad economic and trade-related issues, which play a crucial role in
affecting the overall competitiveness of a country’s industry to face
competition domestically and globally.
The confident private sector is forcing the state to give them more
space in policy formulation, shed its extra load, and shift from the all-
encompassing roles of service provider, enabler, and regulator to
merely regulation. Pakistan is no exception to this universal trend, and
the private sector has become an active partner and player in
development, especially in the export sector. However, it needs
incentives like easy access to loans, better infrastructure, tax
concessions, etc.
A country that wants to grow has to expand its market; if the local
market is not large enough to absorb the expansion in output, it has to
find external markets for which its exportable surplus must be
competitive. Either your costs of production should be lower or your
cost of exchange (value of your currency) should absorb the increased
costs and be devalued to that extent. That means maintaining an
appropriate effective exchange rate to ensure certainty, not necessarily
rigid stability.
One of the major reasons for Japan's growth has been its continuous
efforts to improve its competitiveness by adopting both methods of
cost reduction through efficiency improvement and currency
depreciation. The Chinese learned their lesson from them and kept
their currency undervalued. Americans failed to do so and lost their
manufacturing, first to Japan and later to the Chinese.
Education System in
Pakistan: Challenges and
Response
Introduction
“Utopias of equality are biologically doomed, and the best that the
amiable philosopher can hope for is an approximate equality of legal
justice and educational opportunity.”
A. Adult Literacy
B. School Enrollment
C. School Dropouts
More than 50% drop out of school before completing primary, and
80% drop out before matriculation. Girls and those in underdeveloped
regions are the worst, only better than those affected by insurgency and
terrorism. Our middle and high school graduation rates are still very
low. Too many children do not continue beyond primary school or
drop out later. But the Constitution’s Article 25A, the right to
education, promises “free” and “compulsory” education to all five- to
16-year-olds. If we are serious about educating the youth of Pakistan,
we must focus on middle and high schools.
D. Educational Curriculum
E. Teaching
At least the number of teachers is now not a problem, but their own
educational attainment and teaching capabilities need much
improvement. While the issue of Ghost Schools has been blown out of
proportion, the teacher absenteeism rate is high among government
teachers. Besides weak accountability, teachers who live farther from
school are absent more, especially female teachers who do not have
independent transport. The government also often assigns teachers to
non-teaching duties: helping with anti-polio drives, elections, etc.
Another very common reason for absenteeism is private after-school
tuition offered by the majority of the teachers.
F. Quality of Education
Although Pakistan produces about 445,000 university graduates and
10,000 computer science graduates per year, the quality of the
products is far below international standards due to the defective
educational system. For the second year in a row, none of Pakistan’s
universities have made it to the world’s top 500 institutes. Pakistan’s
universities feature somewhere in the top 800, and that too includes
only three universities. Compared to this, India has seven universities,
and China has 24 in the world’s top 500.
G. Educational Divide
There are three divides in the education stream, which are almost
coterminous-rich/poor, rural/urban, and semi-secular/purely
religious, each with a different curriculum and quality of education:
English-medium schools in urban areas for the rich, Urdu medium
schools for the middle classes, and madrassa education for the
marginalised in urban slums and rural areas.
H. Gender Disparity
I. Facilities
Causes
A. Historical Baggage
B. Resource Deficiency
C. Political Governance
While the above two provide the perfect background, it is the political
leadership, past and present, which can be held accountable for their
lack of vision, for their incompetence in formulating appropriate policy
framework, for their self-centeredness, etc. Of course, the record of the
military dictators in this record is not impressive either, but they came
to power for other motives; expecting a long-term vision from them is
asking for the moon. The nationalisation of private schools and
colleges in the 1970s was a bolt from the blue for the private sector,
which took nearly two decades to recover.
We must admit that part of the blame for the current state of affairs in
education lies with society in general and civil society organizations in
particular for not being very vocal and aggressive in this respect. With
few exceptions, there are few non-governmental organizations that
have taken practical steps to fill the vacuum. No doubt, religious
groups have been very active in this field but the output coming out of
the educational institutions established by them is creating its own
problems
F. External Environment
Secondly, we can blame the aid in the form of loans, which no doubt
eased our financial position but created a debt problem for the coming
generations. One-third of our budgetary resources are spent each year
on debt repayment, again leaving less for other societal projects.
Thirdly, it is the global financial crises that hit us hard off and on,
either in the form of higher oil prices or lower commodity prices
Recommendations:
But this figure relates only to government expenditure and 60 per cent
of students who go to government schools. If one includes the private
spending of US$ 8 Billion on education, national expenditure on
education doubles to at least $15 billion, crossing the 4 per cent of GDP
mark.
A. Formulation of a Vision
Any transformation starts with a vision backed by total commitment at
the political and executive levels. The same is true for improving the
educational profile of the country. Countries that have achieved
universal public schooling have done so as part of larger favourite
projects of the elite. According to Faisal Bari,
B. Policy Formulation
After the formulation of a long-term vision for where the country will
be in the medium to long term in terms of education, the elected
representatives should, in association with all the stakeholders, frame a
comprehensive legal regulatory framework that is in sync with the
globally accepted best practices. Some of the fields requiring clear-cut
policy formulation and legislative enactment are
G. Policy Implementation
Here is the test of the leadership capabilities of the civil servants. The
best legal framework and institutional mechanisms can fail to deliver
results if not properly implemented. Attract the best technical and
managerial brains from within the country. Despite all the misgivings
people have about the critical shortage of this crucial element in a
developing country, we can find dedicated and hard-working people
with impeccable integrity to run these institutions. Of course, if such a
talent is not available locally, employ expatriates or even foreigners to
run these institutions with capable and dedicated staff
If we have done this in the past, we can do it in the future too. In this
connection, the state should declare an educational emergency making
education up to matriculation compulsory for boys and girls between
the ages of 6 to 18. The state should take responsibility for primary
education while incentivizing the private sector and reputable NGOs to
come forward in a big way to deliver education at the middle to high
school level. While they could charge a market-based fee, the state
should provide vouchers to deserving students to enroll themselves at
the nearest appropriate-level private school.
In this article, I will try to shed light on the following six structural
fault lines in Pakistan and how they affect everything in Pakistan’s
socio-political landscape and its economic performance.
1. Pakistan’s Geography
2. Historical Traumas
3. Ethnic Composition
4. Economic Fragility
5. Democratic Deficit
6. Institutional weaknesses
Conclusion
Climate Change:
Challenges & Response
Abstract
Climate change is one of the most pressing issues facing our world
today. It is caused by natural actions as well as human activities such
as burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and agriculture, which release
greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and cause global temperatures
to rise. This increase in temperature has far-reaching consequences,
including melting ice caps, rising sea levels, and more frequent and
severe natural disasters.
The effects of climate change are already being felt around the world,
and they will only become more severe unless action is taken to
address the root causes of the problem.
In this article, we will explore the causes and consequences of climate
change and examine some of the ways that individuals, communities,
and governments can work together to mitigate its impact.
When fossil fuels (such as coal, oil, and natural gas) are burned for
energy production, transportation, and industrial processes, they
release significant amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other GHGs,
such as methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). These GHGs trap
heat from the sun in the atmosphere, preventing it from escaping back
into space. This phenomenon is often referred to as the greenhouse
effect.
It’s important to note that global warming refers to the long-term trend
of increasing temperatures, while short-term fluctuations and
variations in weather patterns are considered part of natural climate
variability and not indicative of global warming on their own.
Global warming and climate change are related but not exactly the
same. Global warming refers specifically to the long-term increase in
Earth’s average surface temperature, primarily caused by human
activities that release greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
Climate change is a reality unfolding gradually but surely. Not only are
the frequency and virulence of the extreme meteorological phenomena
increasing, but they are also becoming more persistent due to the
unprecedented speed with which it have unfolded. According to the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), since 1880, the
average global temperature has increased by 0.85°C, sea levels have
risen by 19 cm, and the Arctic has lost 1.07 million km2 of ice per
decade. As per the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO), the
five-year period 2015–2020 was the hottest of all time.
Well, the climate of our planet has changed throughout its life, through
natural causes that can be measured in hundreds and even millions of
years. Several areas have been researched over the years, including
anthropogenic global warming (AGW), which puts a lot of blame on
man-made emissions. However, others do not claim that man-made
emissions are a major cause of climate change. Each theory is plausible
and sheds light on some likely causative factors for climate change.
Some of these are as follows:
Milankovitch theorized that the last ice age ended about 12,000 years
ago. And the next ‘cooling cycle’ may occur in about 30,000 years. A
natural cause of climate change; is just global cooling rather than
global warming.
As per this theory, changes in the coronal ejections and magnetic fields
of the sun cause changes in cloud formation, ocean currents, and wind
that cause the climate to change. An increase in sunspots (which come
and go in a 10- to 11-year cycle) is associated with increased solar
output. It has been calculated that at the height of an 11-year cycle, the
global temperature rises by approximately 0.4%.
3. Cloud formation /El Niño–La Niña cycle.
Some changes occur in the earth’s climate that have no external trigger.
These types of changes are caused by factors and interactions within
the climate system itself. One example of this phenomenon is the El
Niño–La Niña cycle.
When an asteroid strikes the earth, dust and debris particles are
thrown into the upper atmosphere. The sun’s rays are blocked, causing
the insulation to be reduced and the climate to cool. This happens
because energy from the sun is bounced back into space instead of
coming straight through and warming the planet. The effect of this is
immediate and quite profound; this is what happened to the dinosaurs
66 million years ago!
Luckily, the chances of asteroids of that size striking Earth are slim.
However, it has been suggested that our planet, occasionally, passes
through areas of space that contain pockets of asteroids that could also
have had a significant impact on Earth’s climate.
5. Volcanic Activity
Adding up all emissions produced by volcanic eruptions, scientists
estimated that about 0.645 billion metric tons of CO2 is emitted per
year, contributing to climate change. A seemingly tiny number
compared to the 43.1 billion metric tons of CO2 produced by human
activity in 2019.
6. Ocean currents
7. Bio-thermostat
5. Global level (UNO plus other state and non-state entities like NGOs)
A. State-level
Some of the areas in the state that can perform their roles as
regulators, facilitators, and service providers to effectively tackle the
threats posed by climate change are as follows:
Some of the ways the private sector can help the state and society
appropriately respond to the climate change challenge are by
C. Society level
While the state and the private sector can do a lot to respond to the
challenge of Climate Change, all their actions come to naught if society
at large does not cooperate with them wholeheartedly. Some of the
ways it can respond are
D. Individual-level
E. Global Level
Needless to say, climate change is a global crisis and thus needs action
at the global level of adaptation and mitigation through cooperation in
R&D, sharing, and helping. There is still time for us to adopt all the
adaptive and mitigation measures to ensure a decent quality of life in
these harsh times. Policies on adapting to climate change will help us
withstand the consequences of global warming.
Relationship between
Economic Development &
Political Stability
Introduction
1. stable government
2. stable political system
3. internal law & order
There are four different ways in which poor economic performance can
cause political instability
1. General Unrest
2. Regime Changes
3. System Changes
4. Existential Threat
A. General Unrest
A higher growth rate with social justice means a higher quality of life
and general happiness; economic slowdown creates general unrest
because of increasing unemployment, scarcity of goods and services,
and resultant inflationary pressures
It, in turn, adversely affects better income/ job opportunities for their
children, perpetuating generational inequalities. Terrorism has
multiple causes but poverty and inequality become major push factors
for fuelling terrorism in a country.
B. Regime Change
In 1991, days after the Kuwait War, George Bush was enjoying a 90%
approval rating. Clinton’s campaign advantageously used the then-
prevailing recession in the United States as one of the campaign’s
means to successfully unseat George H. W. Bush.
C. System Survival
D. Existential Threat
And do not forget, this deterioration in the quality of life of citizens due
to the poor economic performance of the country could pose an
existential threat to the country itself. Remember the fall of Dhaka in
1971?
Yes, the separation of East Pakistan from its Western wing and
becoming a separate state had had multiple historical reasons but one
major reason was this feeling of being left behind in terms of an
improved standard of living of those living there
1. State Performance
2. Corporate Sector
3. Society
4. Foreign Sector
Let me explain