Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/271252402
CITATIONS READS
10 2,991
4 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Yongseung Yun on 15 August 2015.
Figure 1. Dotted square below process no. 28 is the location where the corroded samples were retrieved in coal syngas
IGCC plant of IAE.
Figure 2. Pitting is observed in the piping of the dotted square area in the industrial waste IGCC plant of IAE.
and partial pressures of individual gas constituents in other hand, industrial wastes are also intermittently
the mixed oxidants must be considered in defining the processed in the different IGCC plant of IAE to gener-
corrosiveness of the environment.1,4-5 ate syngas of essentially similar composition to that of
In the coal-gasifying IGCC pilot plant facility af- coal syngas IGCC of IAE, but the IAE industrial waste
filiated to IAE, material wastage and reduction of wall syngas was found to contain 10 ppm to ~200 ppm
thickness were found extensively on the inner surface of HCl, which turned out to be significantly higher
of Type 316L (UNS S31603)(1) stainless steel piping, than 7 ppm of IAE coal syngas. In the IGCC plant of
which connected particulate removal unit and water IAE where industrial wastes are processed, extensive
scrubber and was exposed to temperature range be- pitting was observed on the wall of Type 316L stain-
tween 150°C and 300°C. Figure 1 is a schematic dia- less steel piping, which connected syngas cooler and
gram of the location where the corroded samples were cleanup units and was exposed to temperatures of
retrieved in coal syngas IGCC plant of IAE. On the 40°C to ~60°C. The schematic diagram of the pitting
(1)
failure location is given in Figure 2. Therefore, actual
UNS numbers are listed in Metals and Alloys in the Unified Num-
bering System, published by the Society of Automotive Engineers Type 316L piping was taken from the failed spots of
(SAE International) and cosponsored by ASTM International. the IAE pilot plants to investigate the root cause of the
failure. The failed piping thus revealed either mate- Piping Sample from Industrial Waste Processing In-
rial loss, resulting in the thinning of the piping wall tegrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle Plant — An-
or pitting; the former is a typically observed example other Type 316L stainless steel piping was cut off from
of corrosion phenomena under these mixed oxidants industrial waste processing IGCC plant (dotted part
environments.4 of Figure 4[a]): a section between syngas cooler and
Therefore, metallographic examination using cleanup unit was exposed to temperatures of 40°C to
scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive x-ray ~60°C before being cut off. In this case, cumulative,
spectrometry (SEM-EDS) analysis and thermodynamic but not continuous, exposure time turned out to be
calculations should be performed to closely examine about 7 days while the piping had been installed in
and explain the observed failures by mixed oxidant place for about 18 months. One batch of operation
corrosion, following the methods of references.3-4,6 By also continued for 8 h and combustion operation was
this, mechanisms of materials degradation and root intermittently performed throughout 18 months until
cause of the observed corrosion behavior were ex- hours of operation totaled about 170 h. More severe
plained. corrosiveness of the internal piping environment is
quite evident as judged from extensive macroscopic
ExpErImEntAl procEdurEs pitting failures observed as shown in Figures 4(b) and
(c). Pits in different extents of progress are also macro-
Failed Piping from the Institute for Advanced scopically shown in Figure 4(c). Chemical composition
Engineering Syngas Plant of those Type 316L stainless steel piping is indicated
Two pieces of piping material were individually in Table 2, according to ASTM A240 316/316L7 and
cut off from two separate IGCC plant units of IAE, ASME SA240/SA240M 316/316L8 specifications.9
one producing coal syngas and the other process-
ing industrial waste, to examine and characterize the Specimen Preparation
failures. Visual inspection combined with periodic The corroded piping samples from longitudinally
monitoring of the piping in both units clearly revealed welded Type 316L stainless steel piping (ø 62 mm with
material loss, and it was quite evident that the two 5 mm thickness) were sectioned into proper sizes
corroded piping samples failed in different modes, using a band saw to fit into the 30 nm and 40 mm
depending on its exposure condition: uniform corro- diameters of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe, which was
sion and pitting of piping samples from coal syngas cut into a cylindrical shape of varying heights, 8 mm
producing and industrial waste processing plants, to 20 mm, to hold epoxy resin. The piping samples
respectively. The corroded piping retrieved from coal of section 2.1 were subsequently cold-mounted,
syngas IGCC of IAE had been subject to 0.9 MPa to ground, and polished on a variable speed rotating
1.1 MPa of internal pressure and the corrosive en- wheel grinder-polisher. Grinding was performed with
vironment of Table 1(a). Regular replacement of the rotating SiC papers from #200 to 2000, and the
piping with sufficient margin of safety was the only mounted samples were further polished with a rotat-
preventive measures taken. On the other hand, the ing cloth soaked with a suspension of alumina (Al2O3)
industrial waste IGCC piping of IAE had been subject particles (size: 0.3 µm). Upon completion of polishing,
to nearly atmospheric pressure of 0.11 MPa and cor- the mounted samples were properly etched using
rosive environment of Table 1(b). It was replaced only Kalling’s no. 2 etch (“waterless” Kalling’s: 100 mL eth-
when macroscopic pitting was visually confirmed. The anol [C2H5OH], 100 mL HCl, and 5 g of cupric chloride
representative compositions of coal and industrial [CuCl2])10 and then further prepared following the
wastes used in the IGCC of IAE are also shown in method of Singh, et al.,11 before examination and
Table 1. The original heat treatment conditions for the characterization of microstructures by SEM and EDS.
examined samples were not clearly known.
Piping Sample from Coal Syngas Integrated Coal Examination and Characterization by Scanning
Gasification Combined Cycle Plant — A piping and Electron Microscopy, Energy-Dispersive
flange made of Type 316L stainless steel was cut off Spectroscopy, and X-Ray Diffraction
from coal syngas IGCC plant section between particu- The morphological and microstructural analysis
late removal unit and water scrubber (dotted part of was conducted using SEM and EDS analyses of the
Figure 3), the internal part of which was exposed to mounted samples. Typical microstructure of the ex-
a temperature range between 150°C and 300°C. In amined Type 316L piping sample is shown in Figure
fact, cumulative, but not continuous, exposure time 5, revealing its grain boundaries. Surface chemical
was about 1 month, though duration of installation composition of the samples along a selected line was
before cutting off totaled about 54 months. One batch also examined. These analyses were made to iden-
of operation continued for about 8 h and combustion tify any possibility of carburization, characterize the
operation was intermittently carried out throughout observed corrosion products in the piping samples,
54 months until total hours of operation totaled about and to deduce and elaborate the mechanism of the
720 h. observed corrosion behavior prevailing in these spots
Table 1
Ranges of Input Gas Compositions Corresponding to the (a) Coal Syngas IGCC and (b) Industrial
Waste Processing IGCC Plant. The Relevant Compositions of Coal and Industrial Wastes are also
Presented in (c) and (d), Respectively. The Range of Input Gas Compositions in (a) and (b) also
Cumulatively Reflect Seasonal as well as Extensive Periods of Shutdown Effects.
(a) input gas composition of coal syngas igCC plant
CO 38% to 48%
H2 17% to 25%
CO2 4% to 10%
N2 10% to 20%
H 2S 250 ppm to 600 ppm
Particulate materials 10,000 mg/m3
HCl 7 ppm
H2O 5%
(c) representative composition of coal used in igCC: initial deformation temperature (iDT), softening
temperature (SF), hemispherical temperature (HT), and fluid temperature (FT) have their usual
significance
Proximate Analysis(1) Moisture 6.77
(wt%) Volatile Matter 40.07
Ash 5.90
Fixed Carbon 47.26
Ultimate Analysis(2) C 68.16
(wt%) H 5.62
N 2.69
S 0.40
O(3) 18.94
Ash Fusion IDT 1,230
Temperature ST 1,250
(°C) HT 1,270
FT 1,290
Gross Heating Value(2) (kcal/kg) 6,576
(1)
As received, (2) Moisture free basis, (3) by difference
(d) representative composition of industrial wastes used in igCC: volatile matter (VM), fixed carbon
(FC), higher heating value (HHV), and moisture free (MF) have their usual significance
Proximate analysis (wt%) HHV
Constituents (%) Moisture VM FC ash (Dry, kcal/kg)
Paper 9.9 7.79 71.45 9.49 11.28 4,158
Fiber 14.2 11.83 60.60 7.90 19.68 3,437
Wood 13.7 15.97 64.57 16.64 2.83 4,300
Vinyl/plastic 28.7 3.66 77.56 0.75 18.04 6,786
Rubber 6.5 1.06 61.96 8.59 28.40 4,468
Noncombustible 27.1 3.55 8.31 1.90 86.24 —
Total 100.0 6.71 52.99 5.61 34.68 3,723
ultimate analysis (MF, wt%)
Constituents (%) C H N S O ash
Paper 9.9 46.25 6.65 0.05 34.74 34.74 12.23
Fiber 14.2 49.11 4.41 9.10 14.87 14.87 22.32
Wood 13.7 43.73 5.66 2.50 44.46 44.46 3.36
Vinyl/plastic 28.7 70.46 10.53 0.03 0.22 0.22 18.73
Rubber 6.5 41.13 5.53 0.05 24.50 24.50 28.70
Noncombustible 27.1 100.00
Total 100.0 40.39 5.44 0.09 13.26 13.26 39.17
(a)
Figure 3. Corroded section between particulate removal unit
and water scrubber at coal syngas IGCC plant of IAE is marked as
dotted square.
Thermodynamic Perspectives
Although an extensive literature survey was
made, corrosion of Type 316L stainless steel piping
(b)
under similar IGCC operating environments rarely
has been considered.12 In view of the observed results
from the present experiments, uniform corrosion and
pitting were main modes of corrosion for Type 316L
stainless steel piping samples from coal syngas and
industrial waste IGCC pilot plants, respectively. A
literature result on corrosion tests of the commercial
alloy sample (0.04 C-2.5Si-0.8 Mn-13.1 Ni-17.3 Cr-Fe
balance in wt%) subject to 500 ppm and 1,000 ppm
HCl-containing gas mixture of 8% O2, 12% CO2, 15%
H2O, and 100 ppm SO2 at a temperature range from
480°C to ~580°C revealed increased (uniform) corro-
sion rates of test samples.12
As a starting point of mixed oxidants corrosion
study, Ellingham-Pourbaix stability diagrams were (c)
constructed using FactSage† software ver. 6.2 to in- Figure 4. (a) Corroded section between syngas cooler and
vestigate the thermodynamic stability of metal chlo- cleanup unit of industrial waste processing IGCC plant at IAE
marked as dotted square. Extensive pitting failure observed
rides and oxides at the test temperatures and define
externally and internally as shown in (b) and (c), respectively. Some
equilibrium conditions of the corrosion test.4,12-13
pits in different extents of progress are also observed in (c).
Other important thermodynamic parameters such
as carbon activity and dew points of corrosive gases
were also calculated using FactSage† steel (FSstel) <0.045%P, <0.03%C, <0.03%S, and balance Fe) at
and oxide (FToxid) databases. 300°C and 60°C for piping samples from coal syngas
Figures 6(a) and (b) show the stability of the reac- producing and industrial waste processing plants, re-
tion products from uniform corrosion and pitting of spectively. Solid squares represent partial pressures
Type 316L piping material (composed of 16% to 18.5% of chlorine and oxygen calculated by using actual cor-
Cr, 10% to 14% Ni, 2% to 3% Mo, <2% Mn, <1% Si, rosive environments of mixed oxidants encountered
†
Trade name. in the present research as a bases for aforementioned
Table 2
Chemical Composition as Represented by ASTM A240
and ASME SA-240 Specifications9 is Indicated in the Table
Below, Where –ab Denotes b—a Range of Compositions(A)
Chemical
Percentage by Weight Composition
(maximum unless of the
range is specified) analyzed Tube
Carbon 0.030 0.035
Manganese 2.00 >2.00
Silicon 0.75 >0.75
Chromium 16.00 16.00
18.00 18.00
Nickel 10.00 10.00
14.00 15.00
Molybdenum 2.00 2.00
3.00 3.00
Phosphorus 0.045 <0.045
Sulfur 0.030 0.005 Figure 5. Typical microstructure of Type 316L piping sample
0.017 examined by SEM.
Nitrogen 0.10 0.1<
Iron Bal. Bal.
(A)
The chemical composition of the analyzed tube is also shown in Corroded Piping Sample from Coal Syngas
the third column. Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle
Plant
thermochemical softwares: the process streams of From Figure 6(a) and Table 3(a), it is strongly in-
coal syngas IGCC and industrial waste processing ferred that mixture of the metal, oxides, and complex
IGCC plants could be regarded as belonging to reduc- oxides are stable at 300°C: Fe (face-centered cubic
ing environments. The ranges of input gas composi- [fcc]) + magnetite (Fe3O4[s]) + tephroite (Mn2SiO4[s]) +
tions are described in Table 1. The detailed reaction pyroxmangite (MnSiO3[s]) + chromite (FeCr2O4[s]) are
products corresponding to the numbers in the phase thermodynamically stable phases of a process stream
stability diagrams of Figures 6(a) and (b) are listed in environment as designated by no. 29 in Figure 6(a).
Tables 3(a) and (b), which represent many thermody- The XRD results (Figure 7[a]) of piping corrosion prod-
namically stable phases available at the given tem- ucts from the coal syngas producing plant revealed
peratures and corrosive environments. The reaction strong peaks of SiO2 and austenite, giving partial jus-
products from uniform corrosion and pitting at 300°C tification of the proposed reactions.
and 60°C could be experimentally differentiated using The observed failure was in the form of (rather
XRD analysis, which is shown in Figure 7. uniform) material loss on the inner wall of the piping,
(a) (b)
Figure 6. Stability diagrams calculated by commercial thermochemical software: (a) at 300°C and (b) at 60°C. Solid
squares represent partial pressures of chlorine and oxygen calculated by using actual corrosive environments of mixed
oxidants encountered in the present research as bases.
Table 3
Detailed Reaction Products Corresponding to the Areas
Given by Numbers in the Phase Stability Diagrams
of Figures 6(a) and (b)
(a) T = 300°C
1) fcc + CrCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + SiO2(s) + FeCl2(s)
2) fcc + MnCl2(s) + Cr2O3(s) + SiO2(s) + FeCl2(s)
3) fcc + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + FeCr2O4(s) + SiO2(s)
4) bcc + SiO2(s) + FeCr2O4(s) + Fe3O4(s) + MnSiO3(s) +
(NiO)(Fe2O3)(s)
5) M23C6 + CrCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + SiO2(s) + fcc + FeCl2(s)
6) M23C6 + MnCl2(s) + Cr2O3(s) + SiO2(s) + fcc + FeCl2(s)
7) M23C6 + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + SiO2(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s)
8) M23C6 + Fe2SiO4(s) + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s)
9) fcc + Fe2SiO4(s) + MnCl2(s) + Fe3O4(s) + FeCr2O4(s)
10) M7C3 + MnCl2(s) + FeCr2O4(s) + Fe3O4(s) + MnSiO3(s) +
(NiO)(Fe2O3)(s)
11) M7C3 + MnCl2(s) + Cr2O3(s) + SiO2(s) + fcc + FeCl2(s)
12) M7C3 + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + SiO2(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s)
13) M7C3 + Fe2SiO4(s) + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s) (a)
14) M23C6 + Fe2SiO4(s) + MnCl2(s) + Fe3O4(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s)
15) M7C3 + Fe2SiO4(s) + MnCl2(s) + Fe3O4(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s)
16) fcc + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + FeCr2O4(s) + SiO2(s)
17) M7C3 + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + SiO2(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s)
18) fcc + Fe2SiO4(s) + FeCl2(s) + FeCr2O4(s) + MnCl2(s)
19) M7C3 + Fe2SiO4(s) + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s)
20) bcc + MnCl2(s) + SiO2(s) + fcc + M7C3 + FeCr2O4(s)
21) bcc + Fe2SiO4(s) + MnCl2(s) + fcc + M7C3 + FeCr2O4(s)
22) bcc + MnCl2(s) + MnSiO3(s) + fcc + M7C3 + FeCr2O4(s)
23) bcc + Mn2SiO4(s) + MnSiO3(s) + fcc + M7C3 + FeCr2O4(s)
24) bcc + Fe2SiO4(s) + Mn2SiO4(s) + fcc + M7C3 + FeCr2O4(s)
25) 7C3 + Fe2SiO4(s) + MnCl2(s) + Fe3O4(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s)
26) M7C3 + Fe2SiO4(s) + Fe3O4(s) + Mn2SiO4(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s)
27) M7C3 + Fe2SiO4(s) + Fe3O4(s) + Mn2SiO4(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s)
28) M23C6 + Fe2SiO4(s) + Fe3O4(s) + Mn2SiO4(s) + fcc + FeCr2O4(s)
29) fcc + Fe3O4(s) + Mn2SiO4(s) + MnSiO3(s) + FeCr2O4(s)
30) M7C3 + FeCr2O4(s) + Fe3O4(s) + Mn2SiO4(s) + MnSiO3(s) +
(NiO)(Fe2O3)(s)
(b) T = 60°C
1) bcc + CrCl3(s) + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + SiO2(s) + NiCl2(s)
2) bcc + Cr2O3(s) + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + SiO2(s) + NiCl2(s) (b)
3) bcc + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + FeCr2O4(s) + SiO2(s) + NiCl2(s)
Figure 7. XRD patterns of powdered corrosion products from Type
4) bcc + MnCl2(s) + FeCr2O4(s) + Fe2O3(s) + SiO2(s) + NiCl2(s)
5) bcc + MnCl2(s) + FeCr2O4(s) + Fe2O3(s) + SiO2(s) + 316L piping samples exposed to 300°C and 60°C at (a) coal syngas
(NiO)(Fe2O3)(s2) producing and (b) industrial waste processing plant, respectively.
6) M7C3 + FeCl2(s) + MnCl2(s) + FeCr2O4(s) + SiO2(s) + NiCl2(s)
7) bcc + Fe3O4(s) + MnCl2(s) + FeCr2O4(s) + SiO2(s) +
(NiO)(Fe2O3)(s2)
plosion hazards and necessitated plant shutdown for
8) bcc + FeCr2O4(s) + Fe2O3(s) + MnSiO3(s) + SiO2(s) +
(NiO)(Fe2O3)(s2) regular checkup and replacements for prevention of
9) M7C3 + Fe3O4(s) + MnCl2(s) + FeCr2O4(s) + SiO2(s) + unexpected disaster. Judging from Figure 8, the
(NiO)(Fe2O3)(s2) thickness of corrosion product was observed to be
about 20 µm. Therefore, the rate of metal loss during
the cumulative exposure time of 1 month is calculated
and it was visually observed. Considering a uniform to be approximately 240 µm/y, which is acceptable
type of corrosion of the retrieved piping without any for coal syngas IGCC piping application. However, in
visible failure observed on the external part of the pip- view of the compound form of corrosion product as
ing, the corroded part of the internal piping was ana- revealed in Figure 7(a), it also has to be noted that
lyzed after it had been sectioned properly, mounted, corrosion products are normally much less dense
and polished as described in the “Specimen Prepara- than the underlying Type 316L stainless steel base
tion” section. Typical cross-sectional microstructure metal. Therefore, the thickness of the corrosion prod-
of the inner wall of the piping is shown in Figure 8. uct layer is equivalent to a much smaller loss of thick-
The observed thinning of the internal piping wall, ness in the base metal, which represents the true
presumably at 150°C to ~300°C, could create a leak corrosion rate. Such a calibration was not made to
path, which could have led insidiously to fire and ex- compensate for actual loss of thickness in the present
+
2MnS + 3H2 O + 2Cl – → 2MnC
nCl – + S 2 O2–
2MnCl 3 + 6H + 8e
–
(2)
(l)
Figure 9. Higher magnification SEM-EDS analysis of typical cross-sectional microstructure of the inner wall: chlorine (c), manganese (d),
and sulfur (k) peaks were detected along the marker line vertically shown in (b). The solid scale bar in (b) corresponds to 60°C. (c) through
(k) represent EDS peaks of respective elements as captioned. Weight percent of individual elemental mapping is analyzed in duplicate and
tabulated at the end. EDS scan was made across the discontinuous boundary between the corrosion product and Type 316L substrate of
pipe connecting particulate removal unit and water scrubber of IAE IGCC pilot plant producing coal syngas: the section was exposed to
temperature range between 150°C and 300°C, and the corrosion product is indicated by two arrows in (b).
(l)
Figure 10 (continued on next page). SEM-EDS analysis of pitting initiation (a), where horizontally scanned cross section was W-shaped
and concave downward toward the bottom of the paper. Strong chlorine, manganese, and sulfur peaks of (c), (d), and (e) observed along the
marker line scanned across the bright ring pattern (a) suggest formation of metal chloride and MnS. (f) through (k) represent EDS peaks of
respective elements as captioned. For reproducibility check, SEM-EDS analysis of the other pit (m) of different extent was similarly made in (n)
through (w). (o) through (w) also represent EDS peaks of respective elements as captioned. Weight percent of individual elemental mapping
for (b) and (n) are analyzed and tabulated in (l) and (x), respectively. The negative quantity for Mn in (x) is attributed to experimental uncertainty
since a finite intensity of Mn spectrum is observed in (u).
(x)
Figure 10 (continued). SEM-EDS analysis of pitting initiation (a), where horizontally scanned cross section was W-shaped and concave
downward toward the bottom of the paper. Strong chlorine, manganese, and sulfur peaks of (c), (d), and (e) observed along the marker line
scanned across the bright ring pattern (a) suggest formation of metal chloride and MnS. (f) through (k) represent EDS peaks of respective
elements as captioned. For reproducibility check, SEM-EDS analysis of the other pit (m) of different extent was similarly made in (n) through
(w). (o) through (w) also represent EDS peaks of respective elements as captioned. Weight percent of individual elemental mapping for (b)
and (n) are analyzed and tabulated in (l) and (x), respectively. The negative quantity for Mn in (x) is attributed to experimental uncertainty since
a finite intensity of Mn spectrum is observed in (u).
(a) (b)
Figure 11. Extensive pitting failure (a) and inside the Type 316L pipe connection (b) between syngas cooler and cleanup
unit of IAE IGCC pilot plant where industrial wastes are intermittently processed: the spot was exposed to temperature
range between 40°C and 60°C.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 12. (a) through (d) three-dimensional SEM profiles of W-shaped pits of Figure 10(a) taken by appropriately tilting
samples at different angles.
Extensive pitting failure was visually observed as fied by a relatively small proportion of corroded piping
shown in Figure 11. On the other hand, an example and is somewhat insidious, it could lead to sudden
of pits was visually observed in Figure 4(c) and the and quite unpredictable disaster caused by leaking
three-dimensional shape of pit initiation is shown in syngas. Therefore, corrosion mechanism was inferred
Figure 12. Figure 4(c) shows various pits of different again from SEM-EDS analysis of pitting initiation il-
extents of progress. Although pitting failure is typi- lustrated in Figure 10(a), where the scanned cross
section was W-shaped and concave downward toward hydrogen evolution controls the cathodic reaction
the bottom of the paper. The W shape of the pit is also rate.21
further inferred from its three-dimensional profiles According to a dew point corrosion mechanism
shown in Figures 12(a) through (d), which were taken suggested by Kivisäkk,5 HCl in contact with air could
by appropriately tilting samples at different angles. decompose to water and chlorine gas, which occurs
Complete penetration of Type 316L stainless steel pip- at temperatures below 600°C, and the driving force
ing was observed after cumulative exposure time of increases with decreasing temperature. Although the
about 1 week, and the maximum pitting rate was cal- corrosive environment of condensate encountered
culated using the equation: in the present research at 60°C cannot be deduced
quantitatively, the 1% HCl concentration obtained by
pit depth (mm) × 365 Kivisäkk5 for flue gas with 300 ppm to 400 ppm HCl
Pit mm/y = (4)
exposure time in days (condensing at 40°C), it is quite likely that less than
1% HCl concentration was present in the condensate
The result calculated is inordinately large of the present environment. However, Kivisäkk5 also
(>260 mm/y) and the Type 316L piping should be observed a significant corrosion rate of ≈3.21 mm/y
replaced with more corrosion-resistant alloy piping. for Type 304L samples located in the inlet of the heat
Strong chlorine, manganese, and sulfur peaks exchanger, which strongly implied effect of specimen
were observed along the marker line scanned across exposure condition on the observed corrosion behav-
the bright ring pattern in Figures 10(c), (d), and (e), ior of pitting failure.
respectively. For reproducibility check, SEM-EDS It is well known that MnS inclusion plays a role
analysis of another pit (Figure 10[m]) of a different of initiation site for pitting corrosion,21 and the con-
extent of progress was similarly made in Figures 10(n) centric ring structure of Figure 10(a) observed in the
through (w). Therefore, it is strongly inferred that for- corroded area was analyzed further by EDS as shown
mation of chloride and sulfide is highly feasible. As for in Figures 10(c) through (e). Also, pitting corrosion
the feasibility of metal dusting with carbides as reac- mechanism should be modified to consider a thin
tion intermediates, thermodynamic activity of (graph- layer of condensate, where pitting progresses prefer-
ite) carbon was again calculated using a commercial entially in the horizontal direction,21 unlike a deep-
thermochemical software with bulk concentration of type pit formed in the bulk chloride solutions. This
carbon as a basis. The carbon activity of 6.8×10–15 at difference of pit morphology is attributed to differ-
60°C thus calculated was too small to ensure any fea- ences in the mass transport and effective cathode
sibility of carbide intermediates and the metal dusting area.21 To clarify the distribution of MnS on the cor-
mechanism is again completely excluded. roded stainless steel surface, an EDS scan was per-
However, the dew point of the process stream cal- formed and the observed EDS spectra of Figures 10(d)
culated by a commercial thermochemical software for and (e) revealed almost similar intensity level peaks
the industrial waste processing IGCC process stream of Mn and S, which strongly indicated feasibility of
(CO: 46%, H2: 23%, CO2: 8%, N2: 17%, H2S: 300 ppm, MnS inclusion across the corroded area. The MnS
HCl: 7 ppm, H2O: 5%) is 74.15°C, which is higher most probably could have dissolved by catalyzation
than the reaction temperature of 60°C for the Type of chloride ions following the similar arguments dis-
316L piping. It is well known that the acid dew point cussed in the “Corroded Piping Sample from Coal
of corrosion in furnaces, especially in air preheaters, Syngas Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Plant”
commonly occurs at bulk temperatures well above the section. EDS analysis of the pit was made in duplicate
dew point and localized cold spots on the metal pip- to corroborate aforementioned arguments, and the
ing can create surface temperatures much lower than result is comprehensively presented in Figures 10(m)
the bulk temperature, resulting in the condensation through (w), where line scanning results are individu-
of corrosive liquids. Since actually measured internal ally or collectively identified as legends in Figures
tubing temperature varied from 40°C to 60°C, the po- 10(b) and (m).
tential for dew point corrosion of internal tubing was Figures 10(q), (r), and (u) also corroborate the
based on actually monitored bulk process tempera- arguments on MnS inclusion as a probable pit initia-
ture of flowing syngas stream. tion site.
In view of these, dew point corrosion by aqueous In view of these, pitting corrosion mechanism of
HCl condensate is a strong possibility while metal the Type 316L piping under condensate is suggested
dusting is completely excluded. From the definition of following Tsutsumi, et al.21 MnS dissolved first by the
the dew point it is inferred that wet corrosion mecha- reaction:
nisms occur when stainless steel is exposed to con-
densed vapor. The electrochemical reactions are the 2MnS + 3H2 O → 2Mn 2 + + S 2 O 2– +
3 + 6H + 8e
–
(5)
same as for wet corrosion.21 For aqueous condensate
systems containing HCl, such as encountered in the This reaction decreases pH in the vicinity of the
present research, metal dissolution takes place and MnS inclusion on the corroding surface, which initi-
ated dissolution of constituent metals, Fe, Ni, and MnS inclusion plays a role of initiation site for
Cr. The pH is further lowered by the hydrolysis reac- pitting corrosion21 and MnS dissolved under acid con-
tions of: densate by the reaction:
Fe 2 + + 2H2 O → Fe(OH
OH)2 + 2H +
e( OH) (6) 2MnS + 3H2 O → 2Mn 2 + + S 2 O 2– +
3 + 6H + 8e
–
(11)
Ni 2 + + 2H2 O → Ni(OH
OH)2 + 2H +
i( OH) (7) The pH is lowered further by the hydrolysis reac-
tions of:
Cr 3 + + 3H2 O → Cr(OH
OH)3 + 3H +
r(OH) (8)
Me 2 + + 2H2 O → Me(OH
OH)2 + 2H +
e( OH) (12)
The metal ions migrate and diffuse outward
through the thin water layer, lowering pH of the sur- where Me represents either Fe, Ni, or Cr.
roundings by the hydrolysis reactions, which further Pitting under a droplet progressed laterally be-
increased the corroded area. Pitting corrosion under cause of the widely formed low-pH region around a
a droplet progresses laterally since low-pH regions pit. The condensate over the corroded area is immedi-
are more widely formed around a pit, compared to ately saturated with the dissolved metal ions, owing to
pitting corrosion in the bulk solution. Besides, the the extremely limited amount of solution. The satura-
solution over the corroded area is immediately satu- tion could reduce the dissolution rate in the center of
rated with the dissolved metal ions because of an ex- the corroded area, which could lead to the W-shaped
tremely limited amount of solution. The saturation cross section.
may reduce the dissolution rate in the center of the
corroded area, which could explain the W-shaped conclusIons
cross section in Figure 10(a). Since the metal ions do
not saturate yet at a circumference of the corroded ❖ Corrosion behavior of Type 316L stainless steel pip-
area and the circumference is closer to the cathode, ing used in IGCC plant facilities processing coal and
the metals dissolve at a higher rate, leading to the industrial waste was explained using SEM/EDS, and
preferential growth of pitting corrosion in the horizon- relevant corrosion mechanism was suggested based
tal direction.21 on SEM/EDS examination and thermodynamic calcu-
lations. The observed material wastage and corrosion
Corrosion Mechanisms behavior of the Type 316L piping material cut off from
Uniform Material Loss on the Piping Sample of Coal the coal syngas IGCC plant were explained by com-
Syngas Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle bined effects of evaporation of iron chlorides and sub-
Plant — Under the predominantly reducing environ- sequent transformation into thin oxides. On the other
ment encountered, oxide phases could be discontinu- hand, the pitting corrosion phenomenon observed on
ous and metal chlorides could form directly on the the inner wall of Type 316L piping cut off from indus-
metal surface: trial waste processing IGCC plant was attributed to
modified pitting mechanism caused by the preferential
M(s) + Cl 2 (g ) → MCl 2 (s) (9) growth of pitting corrosion in the horizontal direction
under an aqueous condensate environment contain-
and M is Fe, Cr, or Ni. The formation of metal chloride ing HCl.
could be strongly favored at the oxide/metal interface ❖ Type 316L stainless steel with nominally 2.0% mo-
where partial pressure of oxygen could become very lybdenum offered less than marginal resistance to the
low. The metal chloride is subsequently transformed ordinary IGCC environments. Attempts to use Type
to oxides, following the arguments of Asteman and 316L stainless steel were mostly unsuccessful, and
Spiegel.4 pH and acid condensate must be limited and closely
Besides, it is strongly inferred that the MnS in- controlled to avoid pitting corrosion.
clusion dissolved by catalyzation reaction of chloride
ion:21 AcKnoWlEdGmEnts
2MnS + 3H2 O + 2Cl – → 2MnCl + + S 2 O2– +
3 + 6H + 8e (10) This work was supported by the Energy Efficiency
& Resources Program of the Korea Institute of Energy
which could further accelerate corrosion of the piping. Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant
Pitting Failure of the Piping Sample from Industrial funded by the Korea Government Ministry of Knowl-
Waste Processing Integrated Coal Gasification Com- edge Economy (no. 2008-C-CD11-P-05-0-000). Y.-B.
bined Cycle Plant — Extensive pitting by condensation Kang (Pohang University of Science and Technol-
of acids accounts for most of the corrosion failures, ogy, Pohang, Korea), J. Park, and B. Kim (of IAE and
where metal dissolution takes place and hydrogen Yonsei University, Korea, respectively) are gratefully
evolution controls the cathodic reaction rate.21 acknowledged for their experimental and editorial
assistance. Last, but not least, thanks are due to re- 10. A.M. Wusatowska-Sarnek, M.J. Blackburn, M. Aindow, Mater.
Sci. Eng. A360 (2003): p. 390-395.
viewers for helpful comments and suggestions. 11. M. Singh, R. Asthana, T.P. Shpargel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A498
(2008): p. 19-30.
rEfErEncEs 12. S.-H. Lee, M.J. Castaldi, N.J. Themelis, “The Effects of Varied
Hydrogen Chloride Gas Concentrations on Corrosion Rates of
Commercial Tube Alloys Under Simulated Environment of WTE
1. B.L. Eyre, Prog. Mater. Sci. 42 (1997): p. 23-37.
Facilities,” paper no. 1916, Proc. NAWTEC16, 16th Annual North
2. F. Pinto, R.L. André, C. Franco, H. Lopes, C. Carolino, R. Costa,
American Waste-to-Energy Conf., held May 19-21 (New York, NY:
I. Gulyurtlu, Fuel 89 (2010): p. 3340-3351.
ASME, 2008).
3. J. Zhang, K. Boddington, D.J. Young, Corros. Sci. 50 (2008): p.
13. S. Lee, K. Maemura, T. Yamamura, S. Nakazawa, K.H. Lee, D.
3107-3115. Chang, J.-H. Ahn, H. Chung, Corrosion 62 (2006): p. 13-28.
4. H. Asteman, M. Spiegel, Corros. Sci. 49 (2007): p. 3626-3637. 14. H.P. Nielsen, F.J. Frandsen, K. Dam-Johansen, L.L. Baxter, Prog.
5. U. Kivisääk, Corros. Sci. 45 (2003): p. 485-495. Energy Combust. Sci. 26 (2000): p. 283-298.
6. J. Xie, H. Cai, L. Davies, I. Sudlow, N. Lane, D. Oulton, Mater. 15. S. Hastuty, A. Nishikawa, T. Tsuru, Corros. Sci. 52 (2010): p.
Charact. 61 (2010): p. 145-153. 2035-2043.
7. ASTM A240, “Standard Specification for Chromium and Chro- 16. Z. Zeng, K. Natesan, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007): p. 3640-
mium-Nickel Stainless Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip for Pressure 3647.
Vessels and for General Applications” (West Conshohocken, PA: 17. H.J. Grabke, R. Krajak, J.C. Nava Paz, Corros. Sci. 35 (1993): p.
ASTM International, 2013). 1141-1150.
8. “BPVC Section II – Materials – Part A – Ferrous Materials Specifi- 18. H.J. Grabke, Corrosion 51 (1995): p. 711-720.
cations” (New York, NY: ASME, 2013). 19. H.J. Grabke, E.M. Müller-Lorentz, B. Eltester, M. Lucas, D.
9. Sandmeyer Steel Company, “Specification Sheet: Alloy 316/316L Monceau, Steel Res. Int. 68 (1997): p. 179-185.
(UNS S31600, S31603) W. Nr. 1.4401, 1.4404,” consulted August 20. H.J. Grabke, Corrosion 56 (2000): p. 801-808.
2013, www.sandmeyersteel.com/images/316-316L-317L-Spec- 21. Y. Tsutsumi, A. Nishikata, T. Tsuru, Corros. Sci. (2007): p. 1394-
Sheet.pdf. 1407.