Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There are always sound practical reasons for adapting materials in order to make them as
accessible and useful to learners as possible. However, reasons for adaptation have varied and
changed as the field has developed and views on language acquisition and teaching practice have
become better informed by research and experience.
Adaptation is also appropriate when materials are not ideal, as presented in the following:
a. Methods
b. Language contents
c. Subjects matter
d. Balance of skills
e. Progression and grading
f. Fit an outside syllabus or staging
g. Cultural content
h. Image
Candlin and Breen (1980) focus on adaptation issues that relate to materials specifically
designed for communicative language learning. Their list implies that published materials are
limited in that they do not provide many opportunities for real communication.
Having clear objectives is a necessary starting point for adopting any materials. Clear
adaptation objective(s) for the materials or knowing what ‘works’ for your class will help guide
your choice of adaptation technique(s) as well as help decide the appropriate content or language
choice. McDonough and Shaw start a list of objectives that a teacher may hope to achieve by
adapting classroom materials. They state that, in order to attain greater appropriacy from
materials, you can adapt to: Personalize, individualize, localize, modernize.
learners can decide whether they would like to follow a route that caters to their preferred
cognitive learning style (style matching) or to try a cognitive style that is less comfortable (style
stretching). Learners could choose between the styles of field dependent or independent, global
or analytical, impulsive or reflective, intuitive-random or concrete-sequential, perceiving or
judging, and feeling or thinking, among others (for definitions of these learning styles, see Reid,
1995).
Adapting material to provide for learner autonomy may mean including learner training
with the objective of helping learners acquire language outside the classroom or without the
guidance of the teacher. An example may be setting time in class for reading and listening for
pleasure and discussing material that students liked or did not like, rather than using the material
to exemplify discrete language points or as text for comprehension questions. Activities that
encourage learners to discover independently rules and conventions about the target language
could also have the potential to create autonomous learners.
There are different ways to make input more engaging. One way is to rewrite or re-record
text, to give it more authenticity or interest. Another way is to change the form of input. For
example, a reading text as input might be presented as a game or interactive activity, rather than
simply as a reading passage. Another way to make input more engaging is to change the nature
of the tasks. For example, rather than have a reading task which focuses on comprehension,
switch the task to prediction, or allow students to finish creatively a story with their own ending.
By participating in this type of activity, learners still demonstrate comprehension or a lack of
comprehension but without direct testing and the risk of failure.
a. Adding
b. Deleting
c. Simplifying
d. Reordering
e. Replacing Material
In order to exemplify some of the adaptation principles and techniques mentioned in this
paper, we will describe a real teaching scenario and select published course book that could be
realistically used in this scenario.
In first language acquisition, the most basic theory is the conscience hypothesis which
states that language acquisition is strongly supported by the LAD (Language Acquisition Device)
or language acquisition device. According to Chomsky, as a pioneer of the nativism view, LAD
is owned by children from birth, thus enabling them to acquire a language (both mother tongue
and other languages). Therefore, there are many grammatical features of the mother tongue that
one does not need to learn consciously or specifically. It is assumed that the inborn structures
and patterns of language are the same in all languages.
Language acquisition and language learning are two important concepts in the study of
the linguistics, and they both have an impact on those who work in language instruction. Both of
these terms refer to ways that human beings learn language. Language acquisition is the process
by which humans acquire the capacity to perceive and comprehend language, as well as to
produce and use words and sentences to communicate.
Language learning more focuses on the rules and structures of a language or not
communicative or rarely use in daily conversation. Language learning focuses on developing the
ability to communicate in a second language. In language learning, students have conscious
knowledge of the new language and can talk about that knowledge. The student will have a deep
knowledge of the grammatical forms and their usages but will struggle to be able to
communicate them in context.
Language Acquisition is the process of imitation or reinforcement which sometimes
called as the habit formation. Therefore, from those view we can conclude that people, especially
the child commonly get linguistics forms through the process of analogy with other form. In the
late decade, however, those views are objected by many studies and observations done which
indicate that child cannot proceed in the acquisition of language by relying only on a process of
analogy.
On the other hand, by relying on the phenomenon which shows that environment still
gives effect to the first language learners, they need both incoming data and something that
allows them to process the data they are exposed to only for learning a language. Moreover,
children are able to speak a language that never been heard by applying the structure of the
language which unconsciously understood through LAD and internalize it.
Furthermore, in the process of acquiring language, LAD receives the language from the
environment either in well-formed or not. LAD has a mechanism for choosing and separating the
incoming data or language thus only the well-formed which will be taken. For instance, in
communication process, we often forget what we want to speak and finally we produce a
sentence or language ungrammatically such as “the man, over there I love, who wears, are
standing blue clothes” which is actually arranged as “I love the man who wears blue clothes
standing over there”. LAD is also a hypothesis maker that make a conclusion of a statement in
one language and evaluate it among the rules provided by considering which one the most well-
formed, the most efficient, and the most economic as well.
Aitchison has the same perspective with Chomsky that defines LAD as the process of
acquiring a language in which Linguistic Universal is received and it will be concluded by
hypothesis maker then evaluated. Finally it will be produced or spoken in well-formed or
grammatically is true.
In short, the process of acquiring language depends on the Language Acquisition Device
(LAD) which has been owned by children since they were born. Then, that condition makes
children be easier to acquire a language by predicting a structure of one language. Therefore,
they need not learn a characteristic of many languages consciously. They just need to utilize the
work of Language Acquisition Device (LAD) itself.
Bilingualism is a term which stands for the ability to use two languages. “To be bilingual
means different things to different people. Bilingualism encompasses a range of proficiencies
and contexts”. Therefore, the child may learn one language at home and another at school. But
sometimes bilingualism is a choice, and parents may wish to expose their child to another
language, even if they do not speak a second language themselves. Bilingual children are better
able to focus their attention on relevant information and ignore distractions.
Bilingual individuals have been shown to be more creative and better at planning and
solving complex problems than monolinguals.
The effects of aging on the brain are diminished among bilingual adults.
Bilingual individuals have greater access to people and resources.
This topic may seem as simple grammar understanding. Yet, there is much deeper
comprehension than just the grammar. Most people may comprehend that mother language and
mother’s language are the same way to convey the term native Mother Language VS Mother’s
Language. The term mother language is actually the term of native language because it
represents the term about what language that is acquired by a child as his first language.
If a child was born from a Javanese mother but he was raised in England since he was a
baby for a long time, English language is his mother language despite his mother’s Javanese
genes. This means that This means that whatever language we learnt first since we were children
will be our native language.
According to Darjowidjojo (2005: 242), the term mother’s language is synonymous with
the terms mothers, parents, and child directed speech. Mother’s language is a language which is
used by adult or teenager to communicate with a younger kid who is still starting to learn
language. This can be described when we are talking to a kid in kindergarten grade. We are
actually speaking with mother’s language since we will mostly try to speak with following ways:
using rather short sentences, high-pitched voice, a bit exaggerating in the intonation, quite slow
speech, repetition, and lot of nicknames.
Since mother’s language only concerns about the way a language is communicated
toward a child, we cannot conclude that mother’s language is the native language. Mother’s
language is just a way in communicating a language.
Chomsky describes mother’s language as a degenerate form of language since this kind
of language is not based on rule- governed system which makes the language not neat and nice.
However, Gleitman (1997) and Snow (1997) argue that mother’s language is not as bad as
Chomsky describes. On the contrary, they state that the mother’s language still have many
positive aspects and effects towards language learning of a child.
Resume Group 6 English Material Development
General English is one of the English learning programs for the general category. In
practice or in the learning process, General English teaches speaking and listening more than
theory. However, General English also focuses on teaching reading and writing skills in addition
to grammar and vocabulary. The courses are designed for people who want to improve their real-
life English core skills: reading, listening, speaking and writing as well as the two language
foundations: grammar and vocabulary. Mastering this skill will provide you with more
professional and academic opportunities in the future.
The following is the General English material based on its level, such as:
1. General English Beginner Level Material
This beginner level is intended for beginners who are just about to learn basic or basic
English. At this level, the General English material taught is usually in the form of daily English
conversation/use, increasing vocabulary savings, and improving speaking-listening skills by
increasing practice sessions. The following is a complete description of the material taught at the
beginner level.
Listening
Reading
Speaking
Grammar
2. Material General English Level Intermediate
After completing the basic level, go up one level at the intermediate level or advanced /
intermediate level. If at the beginner level they teach more everyday conversations, then at this
level students are invited to get used to using formal variety of conversations, emphasizing strict
grammar learning and effective communication. Here are more or less details of the material
taught at the intermediate level:
Listening: the material being taught includes listening to the direction and
dialogue on various topics.
Reading: Deepening part of speech material, translating, and answering questions.
Speaking: Learn speaking about describing various kinds of things, practicing
pronunciation.
Grammar: at this level, grammar material that is taught focuses more on clauses,
sentences, active and passive voice.
3. General English Level Advanced Material
At the advanced level, students are taught to use academic language, study grammar
masters, up to the level of studying business speech and writing. The following materials are
usually taught in advanced level General English:
Writing
Speaking
Grammar
There are differences, however, between GE and EFL contexts. In GE, students are
physically in the English-speaking environment. The learners face immediate needs for everyday
communication to cope with life outside the classrooms. The length of GPL courses tends to be
short (e.g. two-four weeks); therefore the learners will expect visible short-term benefits with
which they can go back to their countries. The number in a class is on the small side and classes
tend to consist of multi-cultural learners with different previous training experiences.
EFL learners, on the other hand, do not have immediate everyday communication needs
outside the classroom, such as buying tickets at the cinema or ordering food in a restaurant. The
length of the course tends to be at the level of term, semester or academic/calendar year and the
class is more likely to consist of a homogenous mono-lingual/mono-cultural group. EFL learners
often face examinations.
Even though it is used in English-speaking countries, in fact the course book for general
English still has many discrepancies in it. according to the survey, GE students seem to indicate
that they will want material that helps them manage day-to-day interactions in the specific
English-speaking environment they are in. They also commented that they prefer what they do in
class to have more connection with what happens to them outside of the classroom. GE students
and teachers stated that often the activities in the low-level materials were too easy, they wished
for more interesting text materials and activities.
On the other hand, EFL teacher and learners seem to find texts which focus on everyday
interaction in the UK or USA to be interesting but not relevant enough. Through the responses in
the survey, it is concluded that no matter how good the materials are, they will never be able to
meet the different needs and desires stemming from the different learning contexts, learning
styles, cultural norms, and experiences of each learner. It would be unrealistic to expect global
materials to meet all student needs and wants.
Based on the survey, the following are some of the major problems with GE material:
a. There are too many dry and dull texts
b. Many of the texts are not authentic or real
c. Texts and activities are not preparing students for real life situations
d. Texts and activities do not engage the interest of foreign students
e. Texts and activities seem to be culturally biased toward white middle-class British
f. Grammar exercises are often not related to the texts
g. There are so many activities to get through
h. Format are repetitive
A. Self-Access Material
In this material offer experience of language in authentic use and some set the learners
authentic tasks. On the stereotypical image of self-access materials is still of practice exercises
which enable the learners to work on what they need in their own time and at their own pace
without reference to a teacher. Such materials attempt to achieve the desirable objective of
learner centered, learner-invested activity. Typically, they are used to supplement (or even
replace), when classroom learning activities and usually they focus on providing practice in the
use of specific language items or language skills which are problematic for the students.
According (Lin and Brown 1994), Believe that the value of single focus materials is for
self-access learners, have identified their specific problems and are interested in improving their
language skills. The development of such materials and their attractive accessibility in learning
center or learning packages remains a positive feature of foreign language-learning pedagogy.
However, the main strength of self-access materials has often been their main weakness too. In
order to make sure that learners can work entirely on their own and still receive useful feedback,
there has often been a limiting tendency to restrict the activities to those which can most easily
be self-marked by the learners themselves. most self-access materials still consist of controlled or
guided practice activities which use cloze, multiple choice, gap-filling, matching and
transformation activities to facilitate self-marking and focused feedback.
1. Principle of access-self activities
Be self-access in the conventional sense of providing opportunities for learners to choose
what to work on and to do so in their own time and at their own pace.
Be open-ended in the sense that they do not have correct and incorrect answers, but rather
permit a variety of acceptable responses.
Engage the learners’ individuality in the activities in such a way as to exploit their prior
experience and to provide opportunities for personal development.
Involve the learners as human beings rather than just as language learners.
Require a personal investment of energy and attention in order for learner discoveries to
be made (as recommended in Tomlinson 1994a, 2007 and as exemplified in Bolitho and
Tomlinson 2005).
2. Suitable texts for access-self materials
Ronnqvist and Sell (1994) say in discussing the value of literature in language education
for teenagers, ‘the reading of literary texts in the target language gives genuine and easily
available experience in the pragmatics of relating formal linguistic expression to situational and
socio-cultural contexts’. Of course, in order for this potential to be realized, the learners have to
want to interact with the text and therefore have to be provided with a wide choice of texts to
choose from. It has certainly been my experience that ‘providing the learners have some say in
the choice of texts and are not forced to “study”, then literature can motivate even the most
reluctant learners because of its appeal to their humanity’ (Tomlinson 1994b). Other genres and
text-types with similar access-self potential are newspaper reports, editorials and articles,
television and radio news broadcasts, advertisements, magazine articles and television discussion
and documentary program. One of the obvious advantages of narrative, though, is that it can be
written for any level of learner without any loss of authenticity”.
B. Definition of Extensive Reading
Theory and practice extensive reading as an approach to foreign language teaching in
general, and to the teaching of foreign language reading in particular are worked out by Harold
Palmer (1968), extensive reading is reading easy book and don’t have to understand every words,
the readers are going to go to concern with the general understanding than meaning of sentence
(Richard,1998) State that “ER can be defined as the independent reading of a large quantity of
material for information or pleasure”, students are able to start with easy and interesting text,
they choose what they want to read based on their interests. If a student finds a book is too
difficult or they don't enjoy it, they can change it for another one. They free to get material and
topics easily so that they can read as many topics as possible, the topic can start with picture
books so that they get excited with stories and learn and remember them to find information and
general description or meaning, overall meaning.
The most important basic principles of extensive reading that the material is simple and
reading material from various topics for language learning. extensive reading will not succeed if
students are faced with difficult material, so they have to struggle hard in understanding terms
that they do not yet know. finding the material they want and brands they like will encourage
interest in reading and minimize boredom in reading. Day and Bamford explicitly state that there
are two characteristics as Extensive Reading principles what students read.
1. Principle of Extensive Reading
Principles in teaching reading are the principles that will direct the direction of the goal
reading learning process, because a principle will influence and produce various actions or processes.
This research will discuss the principles of extensive reading proposed by Julian Bamford and Ricard
R. Day, they identify ten characteristics found in successful extensive reading programs.
The reading material is easy
A variety of reading material on a wide range of topic
Learners choose what they want to read
Learners read as much as possible
Reading speed is usually faster rather than slower
The purpose of reading is usually related to pleasure, information, and genera
understanding.
2. Extensive Reading Materials
Reading for pleasure requires a large selection of books be available for students to
choose from at their level. According to Harmer one of the fundamental conditions of a
successful extensive reading program is that students should be reading material which they can
understand (Harmer, 2001). Here, teachers can make good use of graded readers (books which
have been written specifically for EFL/ESL students or which have been adapted from authentic
texts). Selecting appropriate reading materials can help build reading confidence, reading ability
and build a life-long love of reading in English. Conversely, selecting inappropriate materials
can lead to a vicious circle of poor reading (The Extensive Reading Foundation (ERF) 2011).
Teachers should be careful to watch that students do not choose their books too quickly.
The students should:
Read some of the book itself, not only at the tittle, cover and illustrations
Choose something interesting to read
Find something they can read at about 150-200 words per minute
Choose something they can read without a dictionary.