Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Reading is an activity or cognitive process that seeks to find various
complex process and complicated. When we are reading, our eyes and minds will be
connected to each other. Our eyes will recognize the eyes, while the mind will
understand and connect the meaning of the word. These words' meanings are
connected to the meanings of phrases, clauses, and sentences, and ultimately to the
meaning of the whole passage. Since the eyes and mind must cooperate in order to
process. Reading in English lessons is a receptive skill. Receptive skills are abilities
(KTSP), one of the objectives of learning English in junior high school is to develop
the ability to communicate in English in written and oral form. Communication skills
include writing, reading and listening. By using several types of text (genres) such as
junior high school level. Based on the competency standards set by the government,
there are several types of texts that must be studied at junior high school level,
namely narrative texts, recount texts, procedural texts, descriptive texts, and others.
There are a lot of texts, recount text is a lesson taught in the second grade of junior
high school, this material is usually taught in the second semester. Giving his opinion
about recount text is a text that tells a number of events in the past in a certain time
series sequentially. Recount text is written with the aim of providing information and
significance of the information read in order to gain knowledge and create new
knowledge. This reading comprehension includes various aspects such as the ability
to read, understand, interpret and reconstruct the meaning of what is read. Tarigan
exercise can be done by reading various types of reading materials, ranging from
Sukma, D. (2015)
they enable students to understand and interpret written texts effectively. Recount text
is a type of text commonly used in educational settings, which retells past events or
experiences. The ability to understand recount text is an important skill for students,
because it helps them to learn from other people's experiences and gain knowledge
difficulties can be classified into two groups, namely internal factors and external
Galingging (2021) said that learning difficulties can be shared into two major groups,
Recount text is writing that recounts a story through previous occurrences or present-
day actions, such as those that took place over the holidays or in our daily lives.
According to (Rosalinah et al., 2020), a recount text is a piece of writing that includes
personal experiences or historical experiences of the author or other people. This text
beginning to end. In this sense, recount text can be used to entertain or provide
information to readers. In addition, narrative text can also provide new insights about
events or experiences that occurred, and can help readers better understand how these
events occurred.
METHODE
experimental approach.
this research was the tenth grade at SMAN 1 Bangkinang for the 2022/2023 the
academic year. In this research total sampling technique was utilized to choose the
sample for this investigation. The control class (X3) , has 28 students, while the
experiment group (X1), has 27 students. There are 55 students in this research's
sample.
due to the different treatment given to two classes, namely the experimental class (X)
and the control class (Y). The control group is a class that is not taught reading
comprehension skills using small group discussion. Classes taught using small group
discussion are indicated as experimental groups, both the experimental group and the
control group in this study were taken from different students or classes.
to collect data for their research study. A reading assessment is the research tool. The
Recount text is where the test is found. There are 30 multiple-choice questions on the
There were two classes used as the research sample in this study. Students
take tests from researchers. The pre-test, which is the test taken before receiving
treatment, and the post-test, which is the test taken after treatment, were the two types
of tests that the researcher given both before and after the treatment was given in the
class. After receiving of the class's pre- and post-test results, the researcher applied
After collecting data, the researcher continued to analyze the data. The results
of this research were presented by showing the result of t-test table in comparing the
difference result of students’ reading ability in the pre-test and the post-test.
Table 1.
Comparison of the Pretest and Posttest Scores of the Experimental
Class
Pretest Posttest
Categorie
Class Interval Frekuens
s Frekuensi Mean Mean
i
Excellent 86-100 0 6
Very Good 76-85 0 8
Experiment Good 65-75 0 48.52 10 75.43
Fair 55-64 3 1
Poor <55 24 2
27 27
Based on table 1 and it can be seen that from the results of the experimental
class pretest scores obtained an average value of 48.52 in the “poor category”. The
highest score is in “fair category” with 3 students. The mean score of the students in
the post-test is 75.43 and is in the “good category”. The highest score is in “Excellent
category” with 6 students.
Table 2.
Comparison of the Pretest and Posttest Scores of the Control Class
Based on table 2. and it can be seen that from the results of the control class
pretest scores obtained an average value 43.93 in the “poor category”. The highest
score is in “fair category” with 1 students. The mean score of the students in the post-
test is 63.10 43 and is in the “fair category”. The highest score is in “Very Good
Levene's Test
for Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95%
Std. Confidence
Mean Error Interval of the
Sig. (2- Differe Differe Difference
F Sig. t Df tailed) nce nce Lower Upper
Post- Equal
5.80
Test variances .189 .665 53 .000 12.336 2.124 8.076 16.596
8
assumed
Equal
5.80 52.9
variances not .000 12.336 2.124 8.076 16.596
8 31
assumed
Based on table 3. it can be seen that the sig value (2-tailed) < 0.05, which is
0.665. Based on the research hypothesis, if the sig value (2-tailed) <0.05 then Ho is
The result of students’ pre-test in experimental class showed that the highest
score was 60 , the lowest score was 33 , the mean score was 48.52. Therefore, after
conducting the pre-test, the researcher started to teach the students twice by using
small group discussion method as a treatment. The condition in the classroom when
the researcher gave the treatment, students were being enthusiastic in teaching and
class, the highest score was 93, the lowest score was 63, the mean score was 75.43.
showed that there was a significant difference between students’ reading skill from
the experimental class that received treatment and the control class that did not
receive treatment. Students in the experimental class got a better score in reading than
students’ from the control class. In addition, based on the result of the statistic
calculation indicated that the value of t-test = 0.665 > 0.05 and the value of df 53
with significance 5% is 2.00. The result showed that t-test > t-table (5.80 > 2.00). It
means that t-test was higher than t-table. Since t-test score in the table is higher than
t-test score obtain from the result of calculating, so the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is
accepted and the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. To be concluded there is any effect
Based on the result of the data analysis, it can be concluded that small group
SMAN 1 Bangkinang, according to the findings of the data analysis and discussion.
Comparatively to the control class, which did not get instruction in the small group
reading comprehension abilities after utilizing the strategy. The results of the data
analysis show that pupils in the experimental class do better than those in the control
class.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I want to thank God for his gracious and guidance so that the researcher can
finish this thesis. In addition, I would like thanks to my parents and my siblings who
has given me affection and support. Thankyou for my first advisor, Miss Putri
Asilestari, M.Pd and my second advisor Miss Dr. Citra Ayu, M.Pd, and thanks for
Miss Lusi Marleni, M.Pd and Miss Vitri Angraini guidance, correction, and
directions given.
REFERENCES
Devana, T., & Agustina, A. (2019). Effect of Screen text in Improving Students’
Reading Rate and Reading Comprehension. Jambi-English Language Teaching
Journal, 4(2), 74–80.
Gunawan Tambunsaribu, & Yusniaty Galingging. (2021). Masalah Yang Dihadapi
Pelajar Bahasa Inggris Dalam Memahami Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Dialektika:
Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Budaya, 8(1), 30–41.
https://doi.org/10.33541/dia.v8i1.3110
Kurniawan, D., & Wahyuningsih, T. (2018). Analysis of Student Difficulties in
Statistics Courses. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education
Research, 1(2), 53–55. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v1i2.39