Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bhattacharya ClassCharacterSexuality 1987
Bhattacharya ClassCharacterSexuality 1987
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Social Scientist
'TO WRITE stories about peasants and such people for the delectation o
the 'babus," who having easier access to means of subsistence for the bo
can find leisure for the cultivation of emotions-to provide aesthe
pleasure merely on the basis of the sexual relationship between two h
starved bodies, while suppressing, out of deference to that leisure-seek
reader, the fact of the unremitted, unspeakably harsh struggle for existenc
in which the peasant man and the peasant woman are engaged-this fo
of literary hoax does not hold water any more, although it has not be
completely called off yet. To exploit the literary marketability of
sexuality of peasants and workers in this way, is to concede, in
literary sphere, to the same kind of sick voyeurism that derivcs titillat
from the observation of the sexual acts of birds and beasts'.
The above is a quotation from Manik Bandopadhyay's contribution
to the debate among Bengali Marxist intellectuals in 1948 constituting t
'self-criticism of progressive writers'. Without going into the circum
tances and the details of this debate, we may observe a couple of poin
about this passage. Manik here is talking of the literary conventi
operating among a predominantly urban middle class readership of ficti
He also points out how the integrity of these literary conventions is sou
to be kept intact, even while introducing a new, potentially disturbin
element into this fictional discourse-namely the figure of the peasant m
and the peasant woman.
The kind of realism in which Bengali fiction had already achieve
certain mastery, according to Manik, rendered the representation of
peasant possible in fictional discourse. The rough skin of the peas
woman, the smell of coconut oil in her hair, the filth and raggedness
village life integral to economic deprivation, the crude picturesquenes
local dialect-all this may be presented in fiction in minutest detail
provide a novel attraction. A new kind of sexuality, acceptable on
because it is supposed to be quite outside the purview of middle c
norms,-analogous to the sexuality of 'birds and beasts'-may be impute
to the peasant man and the peasant woman. In this way, the integrity
*Jadavpur University, Calcutta.
middle class norms of sexuality may be rendered safe. The exquisite and
self-deceptive pleasure of 'slumming' may be reproduced through fiction
methods.
However, this symptomatic reading of a particular genre of Bengali
fiction which was becoming popular in the 1930s and 1940s2 does not lead
Manik to the too easy conclusion that the structure of fiction, because o
its class-basis, will always tend to a 'deferral' of signification which goe
beyond the interest of the dominant class, that the 'peasant' as fictiona
construct will always be an abstracted alienation from the peasant i
actuality.
He rather sees the experiments of the above-mentioned naturalistic
school in Bengali fiction as symptoms of the possible onset of a change in
the structure of fictional discourse-a change responsive to certain changes
in the objective historical situation. The fact that the representation of
the peasant, the artisan, the factory worker or the fisherman, becomes such
a crucial challenge to writers of fiction, itself shows a certain responsive-
ness, willy-nilly, to social change. What Manik is more concerned with is
the function that such representation might serve within the over-all
structure of fiction. The new fictional construct, by its rootedness in
extra-fictional reality, may be made into a device for looking at the total
structure from the 'wrong' end, for looking at it upside down, and thus
disturbing the ideological relations which hold the edifice together. It may,
in other words, in changing extra-aesthetic circumstances, resist absorption
into the ideological ambience of bourgeois fiction. The problem that
Manik faces as a writer is: how to make this new fictional construct,
namely 'the peasant' perform this subversive act ?
In the same article a little later, he makes a reference to a specific
crisis in the life of the peasant, which the naturalist writer makes extensive
use of. The peasant woman sells off her body to a willing customer.3
Circumstances, which I will discuss later more specifically, had made this a
relatively common phenomenon in Bengal in the 1940s. But the naturalist
writer, with his deep but restricted acquaintance with the moral and
emotional ambiguity of petty bourgeois life, transforms this problem into
a purely moral and emotional one, while suppressing unwittingly the total
interaction of social relations which forces the peasant woman towards
such an exigency. Thus we have an expurgated version of peasant life
where pathos is created exclusively out of 'the rape of moral values'. 'The
tragedy of land relations' being enacted in the 1940s in rural Bengal, the
general pattern of economic and political oppression, embodied in the
phenomenon of the peasant woman selling her body, is expunged from this
reductive, abstracted presentation of peasant life.
Ideological Conventions
In his short stories, written in the 1940s, Manik tries to use the
figure of the peasant as an analytical tool, to question the ideological
When the famine began, he had taken to looting rice from hoard
and distributing it among the hungry. The effort was short-lived bec
who would agree to loot rice only to give it away ? Later, he goes to
district town and joining the herds of beggars who flock to the reli
kitchen run by the government starts counselling them to grab and eat. Bu
he finds them too lethargic, only waking up to push and jostle each o
when time for the distribution of watery 'khichuri' arrives. Then one
a big consignment of rice comes for the relief kitchen. Before this ca
spirited away to be sold in the black market, Jogi manages to create
furore at the railway station with the help of a few 'anti-socials', so t
those in the management of the kitchen, temporarily baffled, are for
to deposit all the rice at the godown of the relief kitchen. Following t
for a couple of days the 'khichuri' becomes more substantial and even
potato per head is added to it. This creates an astounding change amo
the recipients, who acquire a sudden militancy and start urging Jog
lead them to grab and eat. But Jogi is not just a robber, he is an org
nizer. And he takes time to make plans for launching the attack. In
meantime, the black-marketeers are not sitting idle. At dead of night
the rice vanishes. Next day, the 'khichuri' is more watery than e
Initially this provokes wild anger, but Jogi still needs time, still holds the
back, and by the time he is ready, his companions, back to their usu
watery diet, have sunk into the depth of lethargy again.
Jogi mocks at the usual explanations given by 'babus' to
question why they did not grab and eat, explanations such as: peasan
being naturally law-abiding, did not want to do anything illegal or t
they were, by training, fatalists and accepted death as their fate, or t
they were used to starvation. Jogi exposes the silliness and self-decept
involved in such arguments. No doubt he would also have mocked at
version of the so-called 'entitlement thesis' supplied by foreign academ
of more recent times such as Greenough, according to whom the trad
nalism of the Indian peasantry was such that they morally accepted
situation where food was denied to them by feudal or patriarchal
superiors : in other words, cultural conditioning, (apparently some-
thing unchangeable) was a crucial factor in multiplying the number of
starvation-deaths.7 I am referring to Greenough's thesis here because it
shows how apparently objective scholarship, even today, absorbs without
demur, long-standing myths regarding the cultural staticness of the
peasantry in what was in fact one of the stormiest periods in its history.
What was the mental state of the Bengali peasant when he was starving to
death in 1943 ? A much more plausible reconstruction of this is to be
found in Manik Bandopadhyay's short story than in Greenough's work.
For Manik Bandopadhyay, Jogi is a narrational device exposing the
limitedness of the petty bourgeois understanding of the life and the
moral values of the poor peasant. But Jogi's extraordinary articulateness
is not purely a matter of external authorial intervention, it is a case of
The mode of narration in 'Why Did They Not Grab and Eat ?' is
different, but not less effective. Here the sexuality of the peasant woman is
explicated from two separate angles of vision: (a) through the eyes of
Jogi, (b) through the eyes of Jogi's visitor who makes Jogi tell his story;
both different from the point of view which exploits her as a commodity.
Mechanics of Consent
It is clear that the focus here is not on the supposed philosophical
resignation of the Bengali peasant but on the mechanics of consent in a
semi-feudal society. During the famine ('man-made' not in Greenough's
sense, but in the sense that control over the market was maintained by
landlords and by profiteers big and small) middle and poor peasants,
artisans, fishermen, sharecroppers and landless labourers were not only
forced to live in marginal conditions dictated by the dominant classes, but
they were also forced to die in dictated conditions. Greenough's attempt