Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TBC 1995
1. Determine the patient is an appropriate candidate for rehabilitation by ruling out serious
pathology and serious comorbidities
2. Determine whether patient is appropriate for self-care management
1. Determine the most appropriate rehabilitation approach given the patient’s clinical presentation
1. Symptom modulation approach (pt with recent-new / recurrent LBP episode that cause
symptomatic features)
2. Movement control approach (Pt with moderate ad disability status)
3. Function optimization approach (low pain and disability status)
Superficial tenderness: Tenderness over a wide area of lumbar skin to light touch or pinch.
Non-anatomic tenderness: Deep tenderness over a wide area that crosses the over non-anatomic
boundaries.
Axial loading: In axial loading patient stands and the examiner presses downwards vertically on the
patient’s head, eliciting lumbar pain.
Acetabular rotation: The examiner rotates the shoulder and the pelvis passively in the same plane while
the patient is standing. It is a positive sign if pain is elicited in the first 30 degrees of rotation.
Distracted straight leg raise discrepancy: In distraction test, the same positive physical finding is tested
but while the patient is distracted, which can be achieved by testing a body part of the patient and
observing another. Straight Leg Raising test can be used as a distraction test by using its variations. The
test is positive when the patient reports pain on formal SLR examination such as on supine and the pain
markedly decrease on performing the distracted SLR when the examiner extends the knee with the
patient sitting.
Regional sensory disturbance: The patient’s reports pain that follows a stocking-like disturbance and
doesn’t follow a dermatomal pattern.
Regional weakness: Weakness or cogwheel “giving away” that can’t be explained on neuroanatomical
basis.
Overreaction: Which is exaggerated painful response to a stimulus, that is not reproduced when the
same stimulus is given later.
A score of 3 or more out of the 5 categories is considered significant and the test is positive.
TBC 2007
TBC 2015
Patient psychological status and concurrent comorbidities can weaken the treatment effect
Education on
- Pain theory
- Muscle relaxation techniques
- Sleep hygiene
- Coping skills
- Address catastrophizing about pain and diagnostic findings
TBC // MDT // CFT // MSI
- Manipulation
- Extension-biased back pain
- Flexion-biased back pain
- Stability
- Traction
Manipulation
Fritz identified five criteria to help determine which LBP patients would benefit most from spinal
manipulation:
A JMPT study reported that LBP patients who met the preceding criteria and subsequently underwent
manipulation experienced:
Stability
A 2020 Musculoskeletal Science and Practice review (3) found that the following test cluster was most
accurate for identifying patients with spinal instability:
- Apprehension sign
- Instability catch sign
- Painful catch sign
- Prone instability test
A clinical prediction rule published in the Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (4) reported
the presence of three or more of the following variables predicts a 67% success rate with the
incorporation of a spinal stabilization program.
- Deadbug
- Bird dog
- Side bridge
The two following classification sub-groups, extension-biased and flexion-biased, typically (but not
always) include a radicular complaint into the buttock or leg. Classification into one of these two options
requires defining a “directional preference” based upon what happens to the radicular complaint when
the patient repeatedly performs either end-range extension or end-range flexion.
✓ Centralization: repeated end-range lumbar movements rapidly decrease the most distal referred
or radicular symptoms towards the midline.
✓ Peripheralization: repeated end-range lumbar movements rapidly increase the most distal
referred or radicular symptoms.
Determining which direction (extension vs flexion) relieves your patient's symptoms allows you to dial in
the most effective in-office treatments, exercises, and even home care recommendations. And the
results are pretty impressive:
“In patients with low back pain for more than six weeks … we found the directional preference method
to be slightly more effective than manipulation.”
Traction
The presence of three or more of the following predictors more than doubles the likelihood of disc-
related LBP “greatly improving” with lumbar traction (response increases from 23.3% to 48.7%).
- Sudden onset of symptoms
- Short duration of symptoms
- No segmental hypomobility
- Limited lumbar extension
- Low-level fear-avoidance beliefs