Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The paper should not be a laundry list description, but should offer inferences drawn
from what your eye sees. What does the work suggest by way of its forms, color,
placement of figures, composition, scale, dimensions, treatment of the surface, framing,
the presumed relationship to the viewer, etc? Much of your paper will indeed be based
on the careful observation of forms, however, the paper must show how the described
object works. How is meaning enacted? You may choose to craft your paper around a
particular aspect of a given work, taking into consideration its relationship to other forms
within the work.
You are welcome to conduct further research on a particular work insofar as it enables
you to refine your formal analysis. But, please, no excessive focus on context (e.g.,
a paper that is mostly biographical will receive no credit).
--By the same measure, does the analysis align with the conditions of production? In
other words, is the analysis historical?
--Is the organization logical? Does each point lead into the next?
--Avoid overly general phrasing: ask yourself if it sounds too much like ChatGPT. We
can definitely tell!
--Is the conclusion satisfactory, bringing the paper to an end without repeating what was
stated before?