Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES
1 SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES
1.1 MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT
ref Annex 19 text
1.1.1 The service provider shall
define its safety policy in
accordance with international
and national requirements.
The safety policy shall:
e) be signed by the
accountable executive of the
organization
g) be periodically reviewed to
ensure it remains relevant
and appropriate to the
service provider
1 based on Regulation (EU) No 2016/1377 for the time being.
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
There is a safety policy that includes a It is reviewed periodically to ensure it The accountable manager is
commitment to continuous improvement, remains relevant to the organisation. familiar with the contents of the
observe all applicable legal requirements, safety policy.
standards and considers best practice
signed by the accountable manager.
Assessment results
- Potpis aktuelnog izvršnog direktora
What to look for
- Talk to accountable manager to assess their knowledge and understanding of the safety policy.
- Confirm it meets EU Regulations.
- Interview staff to determine how readable and understandable it is.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS1 ATCO Training Org.
ORO.GEN.200 ORA.GEN.200 Law on Air Transport, ATS.OR.200 ‘Safety ATCO.OR.C.001
'Management system' point 'Management system' point article 106, paragraphs 4 management system’ ‘Management system of training
(a)(2) and (a)(6) (a)(2) and (a)(6) and 5 Point (1) organisations ‘point
AMC1 AMC1 AMC1 (b)
ORO.GEN.200(a)(2) ORA.GEN.200(a)(2) Regulation on standards ATS.OR.200(1)(i) Safety AMC1 ATCO.OR.C.001(b)
'Management system' - 'Management system' - and criteria for use of management system Management system of
[complex operators] [complex organisations] manouvering surfaces, SAFETY POLICY — training organisations
AMC1 AMC1 facilities and equipement at COMPLEX ATS SAFETY POLICY
ORO.GEN.200(a)(1)(2) ORA.GEN.200(a)(1)(2) aerodrome, article 6, PROVIDERS
(3)(5) 'Management (3)(5) 'Management paragraph 4 AMC1 ATS.OR.200(1);
system' point (e) - system' point (e) - (2); (3) Safety
[noncomplex operators] [noncomplex management system
organisations] GENERAL [noncomplex
ATS providers]
1|Page

ref Annex 19 text
1.1.2 The safety policy shall
b) include a clear statement
about the provision of the
necessary resources for the
implementation of the
safety policy
PRESENT
The safety policy includes a statement to
provide appropriate resources.
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES
SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
The organisation is assessing The organisation is reviewing and
the resources being provided to taking action to address any
deliver a safe service and taking forecasted shortfalls in resources.
action to address any shortfalls.
Assessment results

What to look for

- Review available resources including personnel, equipment and financial.
- There are sufficient and competent personnel.
- Review planned manpower vs actual manpower.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
AMC1 AMC1 Law on Air Transport, article ATS.OR.200 ‘Safety ATCO.OR.C.001
ORO.GEN.200(a)(2) ORA.GEN.200(a)(2) 106, paragraphs 4 and 5 management system’ ‘Management system of
'Management system' - 'Management system' - Point (1) training organisations
[complex operators] [complex organisations] Regulation on standards and and related AMCs/GM ‘point (b)
AMC1 AMC1 criteria for use of and related AMCs/GM
ORO.GEN.200(a)(1)(2) ORA.GEN.200(a)(1)(2) manouvering surfaces,
(3)(5) 'Management (3)(5) 'Management facilities and equipement at
system' point (e) - system' point (e) - aerodrome, article 6,
[noncomplex operators] [noncomplex paragraph 4
organisations]

2|Page
 Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES

ref Annex 19 text PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE

1.1.3 The safety policy shall There is a means in place for the The safety policy is communicated People across the organisation are
communication of the safety policy. to all personnel (including relevant familiar with the policy and can
f) be communicated, with contract staff and organisations). describe their obligations in
visible endorsement, respect of the safety policy
throughout the
organization
Assessment results
See 2.1.2 for c) include safety
reporting
procedures What to look for
- Review how safety policy is communicated.
- Safety policy is clearly visible.
- Question managers and staff regarding knowledge of the safety policy.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
AMC1 AMC1 Law on Air Transport, article ATS.OR.200 'Safety AMC1 ATCO.OR.C.001(b)
ORO.GEN.200(a)(2) ORA.GEN.200(a)(2) 106, paragraphs 4 and 5 management system' 'Management system of
'Management system' - 'Management system' - (1)(i) training organisations' point
[complex operators] [complex operators] Regulation on standards and AMC1 (d)
Point (a)(3) Point (a)(3) criteria for use of ATS.OR.200(1)(i)
manouvering surfaces, 'Safety management
Not addressed for Not addressed for facilities and equipement at system' SAFETY
noncomplex operators noncomplex organisations aerodrome, article 6, POLICY — [complex ATS
paragraph 4 providers]
AMC1 ATS.OR.200(1);
(2); (3) Safety
management system
GENERAL [noncomplex
ATS providers]

3|Page
 Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES

ref Annex 19 text PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE

1.1.4 The safety policy shall
a) reflect organizational
commitment regarding safety,
including the promotion of a
positive safety culture
The management commitment to safety is The accountable manager and the
documented within the safety policy. senior management team are
promoting their commitment to the
safety policy through active and
visible participation in the safety
management system.
Decision making, actions and
behaviours reflect a positive
safety culture and there is good
safety leadership that
demonstrates commitment to the
safety policy.

Assessment results

What to look for

- All Managers are familiar with the key elements of the safety policy.
- Evidence of senior management participation in safety meetings, training, conferences etc.
- Feedback from safety culture surveys.
- Relationship with regulator and other stakeholders.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
AMC1 AMC1 Law on Air Transport, ATM/ANS.OR.B.015(a) AMC1 ATCO.OR.C.001(b)
ORO.GEN.200(a)(2) ORA.GEN.200(a)(2) article 106, paragraphs 4 (2) 'Management system of
'Management system' point 'Management system' point and 5 GM3 training organisations' points
(a)(2) - [complex (a)(2) - [complex ATM/ANS.OR.B.005(a) (2) (c), (e) and (f)
operators] organisations] Regulation on standards Management system
AMC1 AMC1 and criteria for use of SAFETY CULTURE
ORO.GEN.200(a)(1)(2) ORA.GEN.200(a)(1)(2) manouvering surfaces, and
(3)(5) 'Management (3)(5) 'Management facilities and equipement at ATS.OR.200 'Safety
system' point (e) - system' point (e) - aerodrome, article 6, management system'
[noncomplex operators] [noncomplex paragraph 4 (1)(i)
organisations] AMC1 ATS.OR.200
(1)(i) 'Safety
management system'

4|Page
 Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES

ref Annex 19 text PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE

1.1.5 The safety policy shall
d) clearly indicate which types
of behaviors are
unacceptable related to the
service provider’s aviation
activities and include the
circumstances under which
disciplinary action would not
apply.
See also Reg. (EU)
376/2014 Article 16.
A Just Culture Policy and principles have There is evidence of the Just Culture The Just Culture policy is applied
been defined that clearly identifies policy and supporting principles in a fair and consistent manner
acceptable and unacceptable behaviours to being applied and promoted to staff. and people trust the policy.
promote a Just Culture. There is evidence that the line
between acceptable and
unacceptable behaviour has
been determined in consultation
with staff and staff
representatives.
Assessment results
Nije jasno definisano šta je prihvatljivo a šta
neprihvatljivo ponašanje, ne radi se staff safety
culture survey
What to look for
- Evidence of when the just culture principles have been applied following an event.
- Evidence of interventions from safety investigations addressing organisational issues rather than focusing only on the individual.
- Review how the organisation is monitoring reporting rates.
- The number of aviation safety reports appropriate to the activities.
- Safety Reports include the reporter’s own errors and events they are involved in (events where no one was watching).
- Feedback on just culture from staff safety culture surveys.
- Interview staff representatives to confirm that they agree with just culture policy and principles.
- Talk to staff to check they are aware of the just culture policy and principles.

Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements

Air Operations
Reg. 376/2014 Article
16(11)
AMC1
ORO.GEN.200(a)(2)'M
anagement system' point
(a)(4) 'safety reporting
principles' - [complex
organisations
Aircrew
Reg. 376/2014 Article
16(11)
AMC1
ORA.GEN.200(a)(2)'M
anagement system' point
(a)(4) 'safety reporting
principles' -
[complex organisations]
Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
Law on Air Transport, Reg. 376/2014 Article Reg. 376/2014 Article 16(11)
article 106, paragraphs 4 16(11)
and 5 AMC1 ATCO.OR.C.001(b)
ATS.OR.200 'Safety 'Management system of
Regulation on standards management system' training organisations'
and criteria for use of (1)(i)
manouvering surfaces, AMC1
facilities and equipement ATS.OR.200(1)(i)
at aerodrome, article 6, 'Safety management
paragraph 4 system' SAFETY
POLICY – [complex ATS
providers]
ATM/ANS.OR.A.065

5|Page

ref Annex 19 text
1.1.6 (New Std. 1.1.2)
Taking due account of its
safety policy, the service
provider shall define safety
objectives.
The safety objectives shall:
a) form the basis for
safety performance
monitoring and measurement
as required by 3.1.2
b) reflect the service
provider’s commitment to
maintain or continuously
improve the overall
effectiveness of the SMS
c) be communicated
throughout the organization
d) be periodically
reviewed to ensure they
remain relevant and
appropriate to the service
provider.
SUMMARY COMMENTS on 1.1. ‘MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT’
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
Safety objectives have been established Safety objectives are relevant to the Achievement of the safety
that are consistent with the safety policy organisation and are being regularly objectives is being monitored by
and there is a means to communicate them reviewed and are communicated senior management and action
throughout the organisation. throughout the organisation. taken to ensure they are being
met.
Assessment results
What to look for
- Assess whether the safety objectives are appropriate and relevant?
- Objectives are defined that will lead to an improvement in processes, outcomes and the development of a positive safety culture
- Assess how safety objectives are communicated throughout the organisation. - Safety objectives are being measured to monitor achievement
through SPIs.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
AMC1 AMC1 Law on Air Transport, ATM/ANS.OR.B.005(a) (3) ATCO.OR.C.001
ORO.GEN.200(a)(2) ORA.GEN.200(a)(2) article 106, paragraphs 4 'Management Management system of
'Management system' 'Management system' and 5 system' training organisations AMC1
point (c)(3) - [complex point (c)(3) - [complex AMC2 ATCO.OR.C.001(b)
organisations] organisations] Regulation on standards ATM/ANS.OR.B.005(a) (3) Management system of
AMC1 AMC1 Management training organisations
and criteria for use of
ORO.GEN.200(a)(3) ORA.GEN.200(a)(3) manouvering surfaces, system SAFETY POLICY
Management system Management system facilities and equipement AMC1
point (d)(1) - [complex point (d)(1) - [complex at aerodrome, article 6, ATS.OR.200(1)(i) Safety
organisations] organisations] paragraph 4 management system
AMC2 AMC2 SAFETY POLICY —
ORO.GEN.200(a)(5) ORA.GEN.200(a)(5) COMPLEX ATS
Management system point Management system point PROVIDERS point
(a) - [complex (a) - [complex (b)(3)
organisations] organisations]
6|Page

1.2 SAFETY ACCOUNTABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITIES
ref Annex 19 text
1.2.1 The service provider shall
a) identify the accountable
executive who, irrespective of
other functions, is
accountable on behalf of the
organization, for the
implementation and
maintenance of an effective
SMS
ref Annex 19 text
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
An accountable manager has been The accountable manager ensures The accountable manager
appointed with full responsibility and that the SMS is properly resourced, ensures that the performance of
ultimate accountability for the SMS. implemented and maintained and the SMS is being monitored,
has the authority to stop the reviewed and improved.
operation if there is an unacceptable
level of safety risk.
Assessment results
What to look for
- Evidence that the accountable manager has the authority to provide sufficient resources for relevant safety improvements.
- Evidence of decision making on risk acceptability.
- Review SMS activities are being carried out in a timely manner and the SMS is sufficiently resourced.
- Evidence of activities being stopped due to unacceptable level of safety risk.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
ORO.GEN.200 ORA.GEN.200 Law on Air Transport, ATS.OR.200 'Safety ATCO.OR.C.001
'Management system' point 'Management system' point article 105, paragraph 2 management system' Management system of
(a)(1) (a)(1) and article 106, paragraphs point (1)(ii)(iii) training organisations, (a)
ORO.GEN.210 ORA.GEN.210 4 and 5 AMC1 ATCO.OR.C.010
'Personnel 'Personnel ATS.OR.200(1)(ii);(iii) ‘Personnel requirements’ point (a)
requirements' point (a) requirements' point (a) Regulation on detailed Safety management
requirements for issuance system
of aerodrome operator ORGANISATION AND
certificate, article 4, point 6 ACCOUNTABILITIES
AMC2
Part 5, point 1 (a) of Annex ATS.OR.200(1)(ii);(iii)
of Regulation on detailed Safety management
requirements for issuance system
of aerodrome operator ORGANISATION AND
certificate ACCOUNTABILITIES
[complex ATS providers]
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
7|Page

1.2.2 The service provider shall
b) clearly define lines
of safety accountability
throughout the organization,
including a direct
accountability for
safety on the part of
senior management,
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES
The safety accountability, authorities and Everyone in the organisation is
responsibilities are clearly defined and aware of and fulfil their safety
documented. responsibilities, authorities and
accountabilities and encouraged
to contribute to the SMS.
Assessment results
The accountable manager and
the senior management team
are aware of the risks faced by
the organisation and safety
management system principles
exist throughout the
organisation so that safety is
part of the everyday language.

c) identify the
responsibilities of all
members of management,
irrespective of other
functions, as well as of
employees, with respect to
the safety performance of
the organisation
d) document and
communicate safety
accountability,
responsibilities, and
authorities throughout the
organization,
e) define the levels of
management with authority to
make decisions regarding
safety risk tolerability.
What to look for
- Question managers and staff regarding their roles and responsibilities.
- Confirm senior managers are aware of the organisation’s safety performance and its most significant risks.
- Evidence of managers having safety related performance targets.
- Look for active participation of the management team in the SMS.
- Evidence of appropriate risk mitigation, action and ownership.
- Levels of Management authorised to make decisions on risk acceptance are defined.
- Acceptance of risk is aligned with authorisations.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
Law on Air Transport, article 105,
paragraph 2 and article 106, paragraphs 4
and 5
Regulation on detailed requirements for
issuance of aerodrome operator certificate,
article 4, point 6
Part 5, point 1 (a) (c) of Annex of
Regulation on detailed requirements for
issuance of aerodrome operator certificate
Regulation on standards and criteria for
use of manouvering surfaces, facilities and
equipement at aerodrome, article 6,
paragraph 10

8|Page
 Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES
1.3 APPOINTMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

ref Annex 19 text PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE

1.3.1 The service provider shall A competent safety manager who is See Annex 19 Note: The safety manager has The safety manager is
appoint a safety manager responsible for the implementation and implemented and is maintaining the competent to manage the SMS
who is responsible for the maintenance of the SMS has been SMS. and identifying improvements in
implementation and appointed with a direct reporting line with The safety manager is in regular a timely manner.
maintenance of the SMS. the accountable manager. communication with the accountable There is a close working
manager and escalates safety relationship with the accountable
issues when appropriate. manager and the safety
manager is considered a trusted
advisor and given appropriate
status in the organisation.
Assessment results
Review of safety report action and closure
timescales( ne radi se)- follow up
korektivnih aktivnosti da poboljšamo
What to look for
- Review safety manager role including credibility and status.
- Appropriate safety training received.
- Evidence of maintained competency.
- Review how the safety manager gets access to internal and external safety information.
- Review how the safety manager communicates and engages with operational staff and senior management.
- Review safety manager workload / allocated time to fulfil role.
- Check there are sufficient resources for SMS activities such as safety investigation, analysis, auditing, safety meeting attendance and
promotion.
- Review of safety report action and closure timescales.
- Interviews with accountable manager and safety manager.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
Law on Air Transport, ATS.OR.200(1)(iii) ATCO.OR.C.010
article 105, paragraph 2 Personnel requirements
and article 106, paragraphs
4 and 5

Regulation on standards
and criteria for use of
manouvering surfaces,
facilities and equipement at
aerodrome, article 6,
paragraph 10

9|Page
 Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES
Annex 19 Note: Depending on the size of the service provider and the complexity of its aviation products or services, the responsibilities for the implementation and maintenance of the SMS may be assigned to
one or more persons, fulfilling the role of safety manager, as their sole function or combined with other duties, provided these do not result in any conflicts of interest.

ref EASA rule reference PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE

1.3.2 Management System AMCs
for complex organisations
The organisation has established There is evidence of meetings taking
appropriate safety committees(s) that place in accordance with the terms
discuss and address safety risks and of reference detailing the attendance
compliance issues and includes the and frequency of meetings. The
accountable manager and the heads of safety committees monitor the
functional areas. effectiveness of the SMS and
compliance monitoring function by
reviewing there are sufficient
resources, actions are being
monitored and appropriate safety
objectives and SPIs have been
established.
Assessment results
Safety committees include key
stakeholders. The outcomes of
the meetings are documented
and communicated and any
actions are agreed, taken and
followed up in a timely manner.
The safety performance and
safety objectives are reviewed
and actioned as appropriate.

What to look for

- Review safety committee and meeting structure and Terms of Reference for each committee / meeting.
- Review meeting attendance levels.
- Review meeting records and actions.
- outcomes are communicated to the rest or the organisation
- Evidence of safety objectives, safety performance and compliance being reviewed and discussed at meetings.
- Participants challenging what is being presented when there is limited evidence.
- Senior management are aware of the most significant risks faced by the organisation and the overall safety performance of the organisation.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
AMC1 AMC1 Law on Air Transport, Not applicable
ORO.GEN.200(a)(1) ORA.GEN.200(a)(1) article 106, paragraphs 4
‘Management system’ ‘Management system’ and 5
points (b), (c) and (d) points (b), (c) and (d)
Part 5, point 1 (a) (c) of
Annex of Regulation on
detailed requirements for
issuance of aerodrome
operator certificate

10 | P a g e

1.4 CO-ORDINATION OF EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANNING
ref Annex 19 text
1.4.1 The service provider required
to establish and maintain an
emergency response plan for
accidents and incidents in
aircraft operations and other
aviation emergencies shall
ensure that the emergency
response plan is properly
coordinated with the
emergency response plans of
those organizations it must
interface with during the
provision of its products and
services.
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
An appropriate emergency response plan The ERP is reviewed and tested to The results of the ERP review
(ERP) has been developed and distributed make sure it remains up to date. Key and testing are assessed and
that defines the procedures, roles, personnel have easy access to the actioned to improve its
responsibilities and actions of the various relevant parts of the ERP at all effectiveness.
organisations and key personnel. times. There is evidence of
coordination with other organisations
as appropriate.
Assessment results
Da napravimo bolju konekciju i koordinaciju sa
ERP, da bude dostupan osoblju erp plan na AT,
kao što je np
What to look for
- Review emergency response plan.
- Review how co-ordination with other organisations is planned.
- Review how ERP is distributed and where copies are held.
- Talk to key personnel and check they have access to the ERP - Different types of foreseeable
emergencies have been considered.
- Review when plan was last reviewed and tested and any actions taken as a result
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
ORO.GEN.200 ORA.GEN.200 Law on Air Transport, ATS.OR.200(1)(iv) Not applicable
'Management system' point 'Management system' point article 106, paragraphs 4 AMC1 (ANSP ERP provisions apply)
(a)(3) (a)(3) and 5 ATS.OR.200(1)(iv)
AMC1 AMC1 Safety management
ORO.GEN.200(a)(3) ORA.GEN.200(a)(3) Regulation on detailed system
'Management system' point 'Management system' point requirements for AMC1
(g) - [complex (g) - [complex issuance of aerodrome ATS.OR.200(1)(iv)
operators] organisations] operator certificate, Safety management
AMC1 AMC1 article 4, point 4 system
ORO.GEN.200(a)(1)(2)(3) ORA.GEN.200(a)(1)(2)( 3) COORDINATION OF
(5) 'Management system' (5) 'Management system' Part 4, point 3 of Annex of EMERGENCY
point (f) - [non-complex point (f) - [noncomplex Regulation on detailed RESPONSE
operators] organisations] requirements for issuance PLANNING FOR
of aerodrome operator ATS PROVIDERS
certificate [complex ATS
providers]
11 | P a g e
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES

12 | P a g e
 Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES

1.5 SMS DOCUMENTATION

ref Annex 19 text PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE

1.5.1 The service provider shall The SMS documentation includes the See Annex 19 note SMS documentation is consistent SMS Documentation is
develop and maintain an SMS policies and processes that describe the with other internal management proactively reviewed for
manual that describes its: organisation’s safety management system systems improvement
and processes. and is representative of the actual
a) safety policy and processes in place. Changes to the
objectives SMS documentation are managed
b) SMS requirements Everyone has easy access to,
familiar with and follow the relevant
c) SMS processes and parts of the SMS documentation.
procedures
Assessment results
d) accountability,
responsibilities and
authorities for SMS processes What to look for
and procedures - Review the SMS Documentation and amendment procedures
- Check for cross references to other documents and procedures.
- Check availability of SMS documentation to all staff
- Check staff know where to find safety related documentation including procedures appropriate to their role.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
AMC1 ORA.GEN.200 Law on Air Transport, ATM/ANS.OR.B.005(b) AMC1 ATCO.OR.C.001(e)
ORO.GEN.200(a)(5) 'Management system' article 106, paragraphs 4 AMC1 Management system of
'Management system' point (a)(5) and 5 ATM/ANS.OR.B.005(b) training organisations
point (a) AMC1 'Management system' and Point (e)(8)
AMC2 ORA.GEN.200(a)(5) Regulation on detailed Annex IV
ORO.GEN.200(a)(5) - 'Management system' requirements for issuance ATS.OR.200(1)(v)
[complex operators] point (a) of aerodrome operator
AMC1 certificate, article 4, points
ORA.GEN.200(a)(5)- 1 and 2 AMC1
[complex organisations] ATS.OR.200(1)(v) Safe
ty management system

Annex 19 Note: Depending on the size of the service provider and the complexity of its aviation products or services, the SMS manual and SMS operational records may be in the form of stand-alone documents
or may be integrated with other organizational documents (or documentation) maintained by the service provider..

13 | P a g e

ref Annex 19 text
1.5.2 The service provider shall
develop and maintain SMS
operational records as part of
its SMS documentation.
SUMMARY COMMENTS on 1.5. ‘SMS DOCUMENTATION’
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY POLICY AND OBJECTIVES
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
The SMS documentation defines the SMS SMS activities are appropriately SMS records are routinely used
outputs and which records of SMS activities stored and found to be complete as inputs for safety management
will be stored. and consistent with appropriate data related tasks and continuous
protection and control. improvement of the SMS
Assessment results
Da nađemo model za sistematičnije
čuvanje i sortiranje dokumentacije SMS
(2.7. poglavlje u priručniku)
What to look for
- Review the supporting SMS documentation (hazard logs, meeting minutes, safety performance reports, risk assessments etc).
- Check how safety records are stored and version controlled.
- Data protection and confidentiality rules have been defined and are consistently applied.
- Check appropriate staff are aware of the records control processes and procedures.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
ORO.GEN.220 ORA.GEN.220 Law on Air Transport, ATM/ANS.OR.B.030 ATCO.OR.C.020 Record
‘Record-keeping’ ‘Record-keeping’ article 106, paragraphs 4 Record keeping keeping
AMC1 AMC1 and 5 ATS.OR.200(1)(v) AMC1 ATCO.OR.C.020(a);(b)
ORO.GEN.220(b) ORA.GEN.220(b) AMC2 Record keeping
‘Record-keeping’ ‘Record-keeping’ ATS.OR.200(1)(v) Saf ety
Regulation on standards management system
and criteria for use of
manouvering surfaces,
facilities and equipement
at aerodrome, article 6,
paragraphs 8 and 9
14 | P a g e

2 SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT
2.1 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
ref Annex 19 text
2.1.1 The service provider shall
develop and maintain a
process to identify hazards
associated with its aviation
products or services.
Hazard identification shall be
based on a combination of
reactive and proactive
methods.
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
There is a process that defines how The hazards are identified and The organisation has a register
reactive and proactive hazard identification documented. Human and of the hazards that is maintained
is gathered from multiple sources (internal organisational Factors related and reviewed to ensure it
and external). hazards are being identified. remains up to date. It is
continuously and proactively
identifying hazards related to its
activities and operational
environment and involves all key
personnel and appropriate
stakeholders. Hazards are
assessed in a systematic and
timely manner
Assessment results
-definisati konačnu formu( izgled) registra
opasnosti koji će da biti baziran na reaktivnim i
proaktivnim metodama identifikovanja hazarda
What to look for
- Review how hazards are identified, analysed and recorded.
- Consider hazards related to: possible accident scenarios / Human and organisational factors / business decisions and processes / Third party
organisations
- Review what internal and external sources of hazards are considered such as: Safety reports / audits / safety surveys / investigations /
inspections / brainstorming / Management of Change activities / Commercial and other external influences etc.
- Investigations of safety occurrences establish causal/contributing factors (why it happened, not just what happened) and identify Human and
organisational contributing factors. Hazards identified from occurrences are processed in compliance with Reg. (EU) 376/2014 Article 4 and 5
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
Law on Air Transport, ORA.GEN.200 ADR.OR.D.005
article 106, paragraph 5 'Management system' 'Management system' point (b)
point (a)(3) (3)
AMC1 AMC1
ORA.GEN.200(a)(3) ADR.OR.D.005(b)(3)
'Management system' 'Management system'
point (a)(1) - [complex
organisations]
AMC1
ORA.GEN.200(a)(1);(2) ;
(3);(5) 'Management
system' points (a), (b) and
15 | P a g e
 Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT

(d) - [non-complex
organisations]

ref EU Regulations PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE

2.1.2 Regulation 376/2014 and There is a confidential reporting The reporting system is simple to There is a healthy reporting
Annex 19 safety reporting system to capture mandatory use, being used and accessible to system based on the volume of
procedures 1.1.1 (c) occurrences and voluntary reports that all personnel. There is feedback to reporting and the quality of
includes a feedback system and the reporter of any actions taken (or reports received.
stored on a database. not taken) and, where appropriate, Safety reports are acted on in a
Responsibilities have been defined as to the rest of the organisation. timely manner Personnel
required by Reg. (EU) 376/2014. Reports are evaluated, processed, express confidence and trust in
The process identifies how reports analysed and stored. People are the organisations reporting
are actioned and timescales aware and fulfil their responsibilities policy and process.
specified. in respect of the reporting system The reporting system is being
Reports are processed within the used to make better
defined timescales. management decision
making and continuous
improvement
The reporting system is available
for third parties to report
(partners, suppliers, contractors).
Assessment results
-radionice sa zaposlenima na kojim će se
govoriti o načinima izvještavanja,
-ispitati tehničku mogućnost da se forma
dobrovoljne prijave iz galiota generiše na
aerodromski sajt
What to look for
- Review the reporting system for access and ease of use.
- Check staff trust the reporting system, are familiar with it and know what should be reported.
- Review how data protection and confidentiality is achieved.
- Evidence of feedback to reporter, the organisation and third parties.
- Assess volume and quality of reports including self reporting.;
- Review report closure rates.
- Check availability to contracted organisations and customers to make reports.
- The system supports analysis and follow-up.
- Confirm responsibilities with regards to occurrence analysis, storage and follow-up clearly defined.
- Check relevant staff are aware of which occurrences should be mandatory.
- Assess how senior management engage with the outputs of the reporting system.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations

16 | P a g e
 Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT

Regulation (EU) 376/2014 Article 4 ‘Mandatory reporting’, Article 5 ‘Voluntary reporting’, Article 13 ‘Occurrence analysis and follow-up at national level’, Article 16
‘Protection of the information source’.

17 | P a g e

2.2 RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION
ref Annex 19 text
2.2.1 The service provider shall
develop and maintain a
process that ensures
analysis, assessment
[and control] of the safety
risks associated with
identified hazards.
See Annex 19 note.
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
There is a process for the analysis and Risk analysis and assessments are Risk analysis and
assessment of safety risks. The level of risk carried out in a consistent manner assessments are reviewed for
the organisation is willing to accept is based on the defined process. consistency and to identify
defined. The defined risk acceptability is improvements in the
being applied. processes. Risk assessments
are regularly reviewed to
ensure they remain current.
Risk acceptability criteria are
used routinely and applied in
management decision making
processes and are regularly
reviewed.
Assessment results
-definisati izgled i formu hazard loga,
- definisati koje matrice rizika koristiti shodno
tipu opasnosti (da li se već dogodilo ili
prediktivno)
What to look for
- Review risk classification scheme and procedures.
- Severity and likelihood criteria defined (or alternative methodology described).
- Review layout of risk register.
- Sample an identified hazard and how it is processed and documented.
- Review what triggers a risk assessment.
- Check any assumptions made and whether they are reviewed.
- Review how issues are classified when there is insufficient quantitative data available.
- Process defines who can accept what level of risk.
- Risk register is being reviewed and monitored by the appropriate safety committee(s).
- Evidence of risk acceptability being routinely applied in decision making processes.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
Law on Air Transport, article 106,
paragraphs 4 and 5
Regulation on standards and criteria
for use of manouvering surfaces,
facilities and equipement at
aerodrome, article 6, paragraph 2
18 | P a g e

Annex 19 Note: The process may include predictive methods of safety data analysis.
ref Annex 19 text
2.2.2 The service provider shall
develop and maintain a
process that ensures
[analysis, assessment and]
control of the safety risks
associated with identified
hazards.
-kontrola sigurnosnog rizika kroz praktikovanje
follow up procesa
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY RISK MANAGEMENT
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
The organisation has a process in Appropriate risk controls are being Risk controls are practical and
place to decide and apply the applied to reduce the risk to an sustainable and applied in a
appropriate risk controls. acceptable level including timelines timely manner and do not create
and allocation of responsibilities. additional risks. Risk Controls
Human Factors are considered as take into consideration
part of the development of Human Factors.
risk controls
Assessment results
What to look for
- Risk controls consider human and organisational factors.
- Evidence of risk controls being actioned and follow up.
- Aggregate risk is being considered.
- Look at whether the risk controls have reduced the residual risk.
- Risk controls clearly identified.
- Review the use of risk controls that rely solely on human intervention.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
AMC1 AMC1 Law on Air Transport, ATS.OR.200(2)(i) ATCO.AR.B.001
ORO.GEN.200(a)(3) ORA.GEN.200(a)(3) article 106, paragraph 5 Management system, (a)(4);
‘Management system’ ‘Management system’ Furthermore, ATSP provisions
point (b) point (b) Regulation on standards apply.
and criteria for use of
manouvering surfaces,
facilities and equipement
at aerodrome, article 6,
paragraph 2
19 | P a g e

3 SAFETY ASSURANCE
3.1 SAFETY PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT
ref Annex 19 text
3.1.1 The service provider shall
develop and maintain the
means to verify the safety
performance of the
organization and to validate
the effectiveness of safety
risk controls.
See Annex 19 Note.
Annex 19 Note: An internal audit process is one means to monitor compliance with safety regulations, the foundation upon which SMS is built, and assess the effectiveness of these safety risk controls and
the SMS. Guidance on the scope of the internal audit process is contained in the Safety Management Manual (SMM) (Doc 9859).
RAG Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY ASSURANCE
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
There is a process in place to assess Risk controls are being verified to Risk controls are assessed and
whether the risk controls are applied and assess whether they are applied actions taken to ensure they are
effective. and effective. effective and delivering a safe
service. The reasons for
ineffectiveness of risk controls
are investigated.
Assessment results
-ovo smo rekli da je operational još uvijek,
radimo risk control kroz HLF obrasce, ali treba
da radimo provjere djelotvornosti tih mjera,
What to look for
- Evidence of risk controls being assessed for effectiveness (eg. audits, surveys, reviews).
- Evidence of risk controls applied by contracted organisations / third parties being assessed.
- Information from safety assurance and compliance monitoring activities feeds back into the safety risk management process.
- Review where risk controls have been changed as a result of the assessment.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
ORO.GEN.200 ORA.GEN.200 Law on Air Transport, ATS.OR.200 (3)(i) Not applicable, however Air
'Management system' 'Management system' article 106, paragraph 5 Traffic Service Provider
point (a)(3) point (a)(3) provisions apply.
AMC1 AMC1 Regulation on standards
ORO.GEN.200(a)(3) ORA.GEN.200(a)(3) and criteria for use of
'Management system' 'Management system' manouvering surfaces,
point (d)(1) - [complex point (d)(1) - [complex facilities and equipement
operators] organisations] at aerodrome, article 6,
paragraph 13
20 | P a g e

ref Annex 19 text
3.1.2 The service provider’s
safety performance shall be
verified in reference to the
safety performance
indicators and safety
performance targets of the
SMS in support of the
organization’s safety
objectives.
RAG Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY ASSURANCE
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
There is a process in place on how the The safety performance of the SPIs are demonstrating the
safety performance of the organisation will organisation is being measured and safety performance of the
be measured including safety performance the SPIs are being continuously organisation and the
indicators and targets linked to the monitored and analysed for trends. effectiveness of risk controls
organisation’s safety objectives. based on reliable data. SPIs are
reviewed and regularly updated
to ensure they remain relevant.
Where the SPIs indicate a risk
control not being effective
appropriate action is taken.
Assessment results
What to look for
- Evidence that SPIs are based on reliable sources of data.
- Evidence of when Safety performance indicators were last reviewed.
- The defined SPIs and targets are appropriate to the organisation’s activities, risks and safety objectives.
- SPIs are focused on what is important rather than what is easy to measure.
- Consideration of any State SPIs.
- Review whether any action has been taken when an SPI is indicating a negative trend (reflecting a risk control or an inappropriate SPI).
- Evidence that results of safety performance monitoring are discussed at senior management level.
- Evidence of feedback provided to the accountable manager.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
ORO.GEN.200 ORA.GEN.200 Law on Air Transport, ATM/ANS.OR.B.005(a) Not applicable, however Air
'Management system' 'Management system' article 106, paragraphs 4 (3) Traffic Service Provider
point (a)(3) point (a)(3) and 5 AMC2 provisions apply.
AMC1 AMC1 ATM/ANS.OR.B.005(a) (3)
ORO.GEN.200(a)(3) ORA.GEN.200(a)(3) Regulation on standards Management system
'Management system' 'Management system' and criteria for use of AMC1
point (d)(1) - [complex point (d)(1) - [complex manouvering surfaces, ATS.OR.200(1)(v) Safe
operators] organisations] facilities and equipement ty management system
at aerodrome, article 6,
paragraph 6
21 | P a g e

3.2 THE MANAGEMENT OF CHANGE
ref Annex 19 text
3.2.1 The service provider shall
develop and maintain a
process to identify changes
which may affect the level of
safety risk associated with its
aviation products or services
and to identify and manage
the safety risks that may
arise from those changes.
RAG Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY ASSURANCE
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
The organisation has established a The management of change The management of change
management of change process to identify process is being used. It includes process is used for all safety
whether changes have an impact on safety hazard identification and risk related changes including
and to manage any identified risks in assessments with appropriate risk Human Factors issues and
accordance with existing safety risk controls being put in place before considers the accumulation of
management processes. the decision to make the change is multiple changes. It is initiated in
taken. Human Factors issues a planned, timely and consistent
have been considered and being manner and
addressed as part of the change includes follow up action that the
management process. change was implemented safely.
Assessment results
Jasno i konkretnije propisati priručnikom koji su
to procesi usluge oprema sistemi kadrovi zbog
kojih se radi CMF
What to look for
- Key stakeholders are involved in the process.
- Review what triggers the process.
- Review recent changes that have been through the risk assessment process.
- Change is signed off by an appropriately authorised person.
- Transitional risks are being identified and managed.
- Review follow up actions such as whether any assumptions made have been validated.
- Review whether there is an impact on previous risk assessments and existing hazards.
- Review whether consideration is given to the accumulative effect of multiple changes.
- Review that business related changes have considered safety risks (organisational restructuring, downsizing, IT projects etc.)
- Evidence of Human Factors issues being addressed during changes.
- Review impact of change on training and competencies.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
Law on Air Transport,
article 106, paragraphs 4
and 5
Regulation on standards
and criteria for use of
manouvering surfaces,
facilities and equipement
at aerodrome, article 6,
paragraph 2
22 | P a g e

3.3 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT OF THE SMS
ref Annex 19 text
3.3.1 The service provider shall
monitor and assess its SMS
processes to maintain or
continuously improve the
overall effectiveness of the
SMS.
RAG Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY ASSURANCE
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
There is a process in place to monitor and There is evidence of the SMS being The assessment of SMS
review the effectiveness of the SMS using periodically reviewed to support the effectiveness uses multiple
the available data and information. assessment of its effectiveness and sources of information including
appropriate action being taken. the safety data analysis that
supports decisions for
continuous improvements.
Assessment results
Interni sistemski audit koji nam radi QMS i ova
sad self-assesment
What to look for
- What information and safety data is used for management decision making for continuous improvement?
- Evidence of: o Lessons learnt being incorporated into SMS and operational processes;
o Best practice being sought and embraced
o Surveys and assessments of organisational culture being carried out and acted upon.
o Data being analysed and results shared with Safety Committees.
- Evidence of follow up actions.
- Feedback from external occurrences, investigation reports, safety meetings, hazard reports, audits, safety data analysis all contribute towards
continuous improvement of the SMS.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
Reg. 216/2008 Reg. 216/2008 Essential Law on Air Transport, ATS.OR.200(2)(iii) AMC1 ATCO.OR.C.001(e)
Essential requirements for requirements for pilot article 106, paragraphs 4 Management system of
air operations point licensing point 3.a.1(ii) for and 5 training organisations point
8.a.4 ATOs and 4.c.1(ii) for (b)
ORO.GEN.200 AeMCs Regulation on standards
'Management system' ORA.GEN.200 and criteria for use of
point (a)(3) and (a)(6) 'Management system' manouvering surfaces,
AMC1 point (a)(3) and (a)(6) facilities and equipement
ORO.GEN.200(a)(3) AMC1 at aerodrome, article 6,
'Management system' ORA.GEN.200(a)(3) paragraphs 3 and 7
point (f) - [complex 'Management system'
operators] point (f) - [complex
AMC1 organisations]
ORO.GEN.200(a)(1);(2 AMC1
);(3);(5) 'Management ORA.GEN.200(a)(1);(2) ;
system' point (e) - (3);(5) 'Management
[noncomplex operators] system' point (e) -
[noncomplex
organisations]
23 | P a g e
RAG Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY ASSURANCE

24 | P a g e

4 SAFETY PROMOTION
4.1 TRAINING AND EDUCATION
ref Annex 19 text
4.1.1 The service provider shall
develop and maintain a safety
training programme that
ensures that personnel are
trained and competent to
perform their SMS duties.
The scope of the safety
training programme shall be
appropriate to each
individual’s involvement in the
SMS.
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY PROMOTION
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
There is a training programme for SMS in The SMS training programme is SMS Training is evaluated for all
place that includes initial and recurrent delivering appropriate training to the aspects (learning objectives,
training. The training covers individual different staff in the organisation and content, teaching methods and
safety duties (including roles, being delivered by competent styles, tests) and is linked to the
responsibilities and accountabilities) and personnel. competency assessment.
how the organisation’s SMS operates.
Training is routinely reviewed to
take into consideration feedback
from different sources.
Assessment results
-nema predavača za SMS
What to look for
- Review the SMS training programme including course content and delivery method.
- Check training records against the training programme.
- Review how the competence of the instructors is being assessed.
- Training considers feedback from external occurrences, investigation reports, safety meetings, hazard reports, audits, safety data analysis,
training, course evaluations etc.
- Review how training is assessed for new staff and changes in position.
- Review any training evaluation.
- Does the training include human and organisational factors?
- Ask staff about their own understanding of their role in the organisation’s SMS and their safety duties. - Check all staff are briefed on
compliance.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
Law on Air Transport, article 106,
paragraphs 4 and 5
Regulation on standards and criteria
for use of manouvering surfaces,
facilities and equipement at
aerodrome, article 6, paragraph 5
Part 5, point 2 of Annex of Regulation
on detailed requirements for issuance
of aerodrome operator certificate
25 | P a g e
 Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY PROMOTION

ref EASA rule reference PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE

4.1.2 EASA There is a process in place to ensure that There is evidence of the process The competency assessment
ORX.GEN.200(a)(4) the organisation has trained and competent being used and being recorded. programme takes appropriate
requirements for personnel. remedial action when necessary
maintaining personnel and feeds into the training
trained and competent to programme.
perform their safety and
compliance tasks Assessment results
Sprovesti anketu, sa upitnikom o provjeri
poznavanja procedura iz domena
sigurnosti/oblasti rada na siguran nacin
What to look for
- Review how competence assessment is carried out on initial recruitment and recurrently.
- Check it includes safety duties and responsibilities and compliance management
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
ORO.GEN.200 ORA.GEN.200 Law on Air Transport, ATM/ANS.OR.B.005(a)(6) AMC1 ATCO.OR.C.001(d)
'Management system' 'Management system' point article 106, paragraphs 4 Annex IV ATS.OR.200 'Safety Management system of training
point (a)(4) (a)(4) and 5 management organisations
AMC1 AMC1 system' (4)(i) ) PERSONNEL
ORO.GEN.200(a)(4) ORA.GEN.200(a)(4) Regulation on standards
'Management system' point 'Management system' point and criteria for use of
(a) (a) manouvering surfaces,
facilities and equipement at
aerodrome, article 6,
paragraph 5

Part 5, point 2 of Annex of

Regulation on detailed
requirements for issuance
of aerodrome operator
certificate

4.2 SAFETY COMMUNICATION

26 | P a g e

ref Annex 19 text
4.2.1 The service provider shall
develop and maintain a
formal means for safety
communication that: ensures
personnel are aware of the
SMS to a degree
commensurate
with their positions conveys
safety-critical information
explains why particular
actions are taken to improve
safety; and explains why
safety procedures are
introduced or changed
See also Reg. (EU)
376/2014 (Article 13(3))
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY PROMOTION
PRESENT SUITABLE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVE
There is a process to determine what safety Safety critical information is being The organization analyses and
critical information needs to be identified and communicated communicates safety
communicated and how it is communicated throughout the organisation to all critical information effectively
throughout the organisation to all personnel personnel as relevant including through a variety of methods as
as relevant. This includes contracted contracted organisations and appropriate to maximise it being
organisations and personnel where personnel where appropriate. understood.
appropriate.
Safety communication is
assessed to determine how it is
being used and understood and
to improve it where appropriate.
Assessment results
-da li su sigurnosna upozorenja i bilteni
djelotvorni, da li su dostupni relevantnom
osoblju
P.S. kroz sve HLF obrasce uvijek nam je jedna
od korektivnih mjera da se kroz program
redovnih obuka osoblju prezentuju događaji i
posledice koje su bile evidentirane i analizirane
What to look for
- Review the sources of information used for safety communication.
- Review the methods used to communicate safety information e.g., meetings, presentations, emails, website access, newsletters, bulletins,
posters etc.
- Assess whether the means of communication is appropriate.
- Is the means for safety communication being reviewed for effectiveness and material used to update relevant training.
- Significant events, changes and investigation outcomes are being communicated.
- Check accessibility to safety information.
- Ask staff about any recent safety communication.
- Review whether information from occurrences are communicated to all relevant personnel (internal and external) and it has been
appropriately dis-identified.
Corresponding EU/EASA Requirements
Air Operations Aircrew Aerodromes ATM/ANS ATCO Training Organisations
Law on Air Transport, article
106, paragraphs 4 and 5
Regulation on standards and
criteria for use of manouvering
surfaces, facilities and
equipement at aerodrome,
article 6, paragraph 7
27 | P a g e
Cross-domain SMS assessment tool – SAFETY PROMOTION

28 | P a g e
- - implementirano

- - nije u potpunosti implementirano