Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Email – alexnaveenprasad@gmail.com
2. Travancore Nature History Society (TNHS), MBRRA 65, Jyothis, Mathrubumi Road,
Vanchiyoor695035, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
3. Greeshmam, BN439, Bapuji Nagar, Medical College P.O., Thiruvananthapuram,
Kerala, India,PIN 695011; Email: kaleshs2002in@gmail.com
4. Centre for Conservation Ecology and Department of Zoology, Muslim Educational
Society (MES) Mampad College, Kerala 676 542, India
5. Sichuan Institute Key Laboratory for Protecting Endangered Birds in the Southwest
Mountains, College of Life Sciences, Leshan Normal University, Leshan 61004,
Peoples Republic of China
Key-words: Butterflies, endemic, diversity, Checklist, Nilgiri Landscape, migration
Abstract: This paper discusses thebutterfly diversity of Nilambur Valley, including the
Karimpuzha Wildlife Sanchuary, Nilambur North and South Forest Division, in the
India. Ofthe 336 species of butterflies reported from the Western Ghats and 326 species
fromKerala, we found 271 species from the study region. This includes 18 species of
Hesperiidae. Thirty-nine species were strict Western Ghats endemics, 21 were IUCN Red-
listed, and 62 were listed in the WPA (Wildlife Protection Act 1972 and its amendments till
2022). We also give a comparative account of the various indices between of Karimpuzha
Wildlife Sanchuary and its bufferzone. Migratory movement of butterflies in the region is
also discussed, in addition to the checklist of butterflies from this relatively understudied
Introduction
Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) are insects that play diverse roles and thus
contribute to the sustainability of ecosystems (Seymoure 2018). Tropical forests are rich
centers of butterfly diversity with nearly 80% of all known butterflies belonging to this
ecosystem (Bonebrake et al. 2010). Effects of global climates, forest fires, logging of trees,
projects and cattle grazing consist of major factors negatively affecting the tropical forests
(Misiukas et al. 2020). These factors have started negatively affecting butterfly populations,
with several studies demonstrating that populations decline along different tropical forests
(Theng et al. 2020; Leidner et al. 2010). Conservation of tropical biodiversity is the key to
maintaining the ecosystem balance on the Earth, and butterflies are a core part of this
ecosystem. Recording their status and diversity is the initial step in any conservation effort
The tropical forests of the Western Ghats are the most species-rich in South Asia, and
along with Sri Lanka being the world's eight 'hottest hotspots' of biological diversity
(Sadasivan & Sengupta, in press 2023). Western Ghats hosts around 336 species out of which
around 326 species are seen in Kerala, of which 39 species are endemic to Western Ghats
(Sadasivan & Sengupta, in press 2023). The Nilambur valley (110 14’-110 24’N & 760 19’-
760 33’E) consist of KWLS, NNFD and NSFD. The New Amrmbalam region, comprising an
area of 265.72 square kilometres in KWLS, was a reserved forest prior to declaration of
KWLS. This ecoregion in the Nilgiri landscape forms an important part of the Western Ghats,
with it being located adjacent to the Nilgris Hills and Silent Valley national park.
The region despite being known for its rich biodiversity, the studies on butterflies in this
region are very few, with notable works from the New Amarmablam Reserve Forest by
Mathew (2009) and Sharma et al (2002). These studies report 133 species of butterflies from
NARF, among which twenty-eight species were either endemic or protected species. The
studies have also reported Species richness, Dominance index, Species diversity, and
Equitability indices of insects including butterflies across different habitats within NARF.
This studies also a migratory movement of butterflies from NARF, the migratory swarms
majorly consisting of the Common Albatross (Appias (Catophaga) albino swinhoei (Moore,
1905)). These observations on migration were published as a separate report by Geroge and
Mathew (2002). A study by Palot (2010) mentions the migration of Dianane butterflies from
the region. Two other studies, one on fruit feeding community of the area (Alex and Das
2014) and other one on Lifecycle of two Hespiridae species from the region were also
reviewed (Alex et al. 2014). Literature on butterfly fauna from the adjacent landscapes like
Silent Valley and the Nilgiris reveals high diversity (Evershed 1910; WIlliams 1938; Briscoe
1952; Larsen 1978, 1987; Sadasivan et al. 2023). From the adjacent Nilgiri hills, Hampson
(1888) had 260 valid taxa, Yates (1935) included 282 species, Wynter-Blyth mentioned 290
species, and Larsen (1987, 88) had 299 species. The Silent Valley National Park also records
high diversity of butterflies, from the Western slopes of SNVP bordering with KWLS,
Mathew and Rahamathulla (1993) and Mathew (1994, 1999) reported around 100 species. A
more recent study by Sadasivan et al. (2023) reports 290 species of butterflies from SVNP
and its buffer zone. Migration of butterflies, especially Danainae and Pieridae butterflies has
been historically well-documented from the nearby Nilgiri Hills (Evershed 1910; Williams
1938; Briscoe 1952; Larsen 1978, 1987). There is also a report on Danainae migration from
No other published records are available on the butterfly diversity of Nilambur Valleys.
This paper prepared in light of our decade long fieldwork provides a checklist of butterflies
of the Nilambur region and also a comparison of butterfly diversity between the KWLS and
its buffer zone. We also report observations on butterfly migrations observed from the region.
The Nilambur valley is located in the slope of the Nilgiri hills of the Western Ghats. The
region is the catchment area of Chaliyar River and its tributaries. The region is located in the
Nilambur taluk of the Malappuram District of Kerala State and can be described as the
catchment area of Chaliyar River and its tributaries. It consists of Nilambur North Forest
Division (NNFD), Nilambur South Forest Division (NSFD) and the Karimpuzha Wildlife
Sanctuary (KWLS). NNFD (849.73 acres) is located in the northern part of the region and is
divided into three ranges: Edavanna, Nilambur and Karulayi. NSFD is located in the southern
part of the valley and is divided into two ranges Karulayi and Kalikkavu. KWLS is spread
across the central area and NSFD. KWLS declared as a wildlife sanctuary on 3 July 2020, it
covers an area of 227.97 sq km and comprises the New NARF and Vadakkekotta vested
forest, except the Manjeri colony of the Cholanaikar tribe. KWLS links the Silent Valley
National Park in Kerala and Mukurthi National Park in Tamil Nadu and thereby creates a
contiguous protective area stretch. The NNFD borders Vellarimala Hills mountain range in
the northern part of the study region. The KWLS occupies the western slope of the Nilgiri
plateau. The region is an important part of the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve along with Silent
The study region is mostly composed of tropical moist deciduous, tropical semi
temperate forests and montane wet temperate grasslands,distributed along the altitudinal
gradient,rising from 40 m to 2554 m above msl .The region has high flora diversity, with
some rare and endangered plant species reported (Sivarajan& Mathew 1997). There are also
different monoculture and multispecies plantations along the peripheral areas, mainly
consisting of teak Tectona grandis and mahogany Swietenia mahagoni. The region also hosts
rich fauna, with 100 taxa of birds, 26 large mammals, 202 moths, 65 Coleoptera, 51
Hymenoptera and 43 freshwater fishes recorded (Mathew 2009; Sharma et al.2002; Baby et
al. 2010).
The climate of the region varies among different areas, depending on location,
topography, altitude etc. An inverse relationship between the temperature and altitude is a
notable feature of the Nilambur region. In the Valleys, the temperature often reaches 45 OC
during summer, whereas temperature in the Ghat region remains 230C. The region receives
more than 4000 mm of annual rainfall (Mathew 2009; Sharma et al. 2002). It is one of the
locations in the Western Ghats that receives high precipitation, which is distributed over two
The Nilambur region is situated in the catchment area of Chaliyar River and its major
tributaries. The Chaliyar River basin covers 6.7 per cent of the total area of Kerala River
basins. The major tributaries in Nilambur region are Cherupuzha and its tributaries, the
Karimpuzha and its tributaries, the Punnapuzha and its tributaries and Kuruvanpuzha. The
major tributaries of Chaliyar River are the Karimpuzha River and its tributaries Talipuzha,
Panapuzha, Manjakallanthodu and Arikayamthodu. There are several small waterfalls along
the course of these rivers. The Cherupuzha River originates from Mukurthi National Park in
Nilgiris district of Tamil Nadu, the river and its tributaries form the major water source for
Nilambur South Forest Division. Punnapuzha is also known as Pandiyar. While one branch of
the river originates from the Northern slopes of Mukurthi National Park, another branch
originates from Gudalur region of Tamil Nadu. Two of these branches join together in
Punnzapunzha merges with Karmipuzha at Chaliyarmukku. Two out of three branches of the
Kuruvanpuzha originate from Kakkadampoyil region, whereas one from the slopes of
The field data were collected by using the standard transect methodology (3 km in 3
hours) described in Sadasivan et al. (2023) using modified Pollard walks (Royer et al. 1998).
Covering all the habitats and elevational gradients of Nilambur region. The localities assessed
Elanchery, Chungathara and Kozhipara. The transact surveys were done in such a way that
each habitat was surveyed at least 10 times from 2012–2018. The details of sampling sites are
given in table 1. Butterflies were identified with visual observations and photographs taken in
field. Evans (1927 & 1949), Larsen (1987, 1988) and Gaonkar (1996) were used to confirm
No. Area
1 Nedumgayam Nilambur Tropical Moist Deciduous 352.1
Forest
u Forest
Forest
Forest
a Forest
Forest
Hill Forest
Forest
Forest
Forest
Churam Forest
Forest
Forest
Forest
forest
forest
The transect encounters (population status) are classified as very common (VC) if
they are seen in >75% of transects, common (C) if they are seen in 50 -75% of transects, not
rare (NR) if they are seen in 25 -50% of transects, rare (R) if they are seen in 5 -25%, and
very rare (VR) if they are seen in 5% of transects following Sadasivan et al. (2023).The
global conservation status as per the Red List information obtained from the IUCN website,
http://www.iucnredlist.org (IUCN 2023), and The Indian Wildlife Protection Act (WPA)
1972 and its amendments till 2022 have been consulted, to determine the legal conservation
The migrationof butterflies of KWLS were observed for 8 years (2012–2020). The
three major butterfly migrations were those of Danines (Euploea and Tirumala), Catopsilia,
and Appias. The butterfly counts were done as per the method described in Mathew & Biony
(2002). The observer stood about 5 meters away from the migration path of the butterflies,
and all of the butterflies that flew in one minute were counted. The counting started from the
were calculated for the KWLS and its buffer zone. The diversity indices were calculated
species richness of mobile organisms such as insects (Hellman and Fowler 1999).
Results
Among the 336 species of butterflies found in Western Ghats and 326 species in
Kerala, we found 271 species of butterflies from Nilambur and its environs (Fig. 2). This
While a total of 265 species of butterflies were found in the study area, 258 species were
recorded from the Karimpuzha Wildlife Sanctuary, while an additional 7 species were
Kerala and Western Ghats were found in Nilambur.Twentysix species of Pieridae were
observed in the study region out of the 32 species in Kerala and 34 species in Western Ghats.
Eighty Nymphalidae species out of 97 recorded from Kerala and 100 from Western Ghats
were found in Nilambur. All two of the Riodinidae species observed in Kerala and Western
Ghats, Abisara bifasciata (suffusa Moore, 1882) and Abisara echerius prunosa (Moore,
1879) were found here. Seventy-Eight species of Lycaenidae out of 94 species in Kerala and
98 in the Western Ghats were observed here. Out of 82 species of Hesperiidae in the Western
2009; Sharma et al.2002), therefore this study reports a more accurate and realistic number of
Fig.2–Family wise distribution of species in Western Ghats, Kerala and Nilambur region.
Endemicity
Fourty nine of the species of butterflies from the region had some sort of endemicity (Fig.
4). There are 39 species recorded to be strictly endemic to the Western Ghats among which
these, Telinga adolphei, Argynnis hybrid, Mycalesis igilia, Mycalesis orcha and Thoressa
sitala are super-endemic to the Nilgiris–Coorg landscape of Western Ghats, only seen in
Table 2- Family-wise list of endemic species and their known distribution (WG–Western
No.
Felder, 1865)
1859)
1843)
1927)
1897)
1897)
1866)
Twenty-one species listed in the IUCN threatened List out of Twenty-two butterflies
listed in from Western Ghats was observed in the study region (Fig. 5). Two species, Idea
malabarica and Parantica nilgiriensis, are listed as Near Threatened, and the rest under Least
Table 3 - Family wise list of species under Red List of IUCN (LC–Least Concerned,
NT–Nearly Threatend)
No. Status
(Fabricius, 1775)
Gaonkar, 1999)
Seventyone species of butterflies are protected under the WPA 1972 in Western Ghats
and 70 in Kerala. Nilambur region had 62 species under the schedules. Five species are listed
under Schedule I, 53 Species under Schedule II, one species under Schedule IV, one species
under both Schedule I& II and one species under both II&IV. Among the butterflies listed in
WAP 1972 and its ammenments, 6 belonged to Papiliondae, another 6 from Pieridae, 17 from
Table 4 - List of species in Nilambur valleys and its environs under WPA 1972 and its
amendments
No. amendments
(Swinhoe, 1885)
1862)
1906)
1908)
1913)
Mason, 1881)
1890)
1868)
1885)
1916)
1925)
1916)
1865)
1915)
1865)
1889)
Population Status
Out of 265 butterflies of recorded, 41 were very common, 78 were common, 82 were not
Danainae and Pieridae butterfly migration has been historically well-documented from
the nearby Nilgiri Hills (Evershed 1910; Williams 1938; Briscoe 1952; Larsen 1978, 1987).
There is also a report on Danainae migration from adjacent Silent Valley National Park
Migration of butterflies from the Nilmabur valley may be read in Mathew and Binoy
(2002) and Palot (2010). Appias (Catophaga) albina swinhoei (Moore, 1905) migration was
reported along the banks of Chaliyar River from northeast to southwest direction (Mathew
and Binoy 2002). Palot (2010) reported danainae migrations from the area, consisting
observed two times a year. During April and May danines observed flying in South-West to
North-East direction, while during October and November, the swarms were seen flying in
the opposite direction of North-East to South-West direction. The six species of butterflies
observed in the swarm were T. limniace exoticus, T. septentrionis dravidarum, E. core core,
E. sylvester coreta, Danaus chrysippus chrysippus (Linnaeus, 1758), and D.genutia
genutia (Cramer, 1779) (Table 5). Throughout eight years common T. limniace dominated
the swarms in number, followed E. core and T. septentrionis (Fig 7) (Table 6). The swarm
were flying 1–3 meters above the ground. It may be also noted that the number of migrant
butterflies has significantly reduced during the eight years (Fig 7) (Table 6).
Appias (Catophaga) albina swinhoei (Moore, 1905) migration was also bidirectional. The
migratory movements were observed in the month of April-June and November- December,
along the banks of the river Chaliyar River at Chaliyarmukku. The movement during April-
May was from southwest to northeast direction and the movement during November-
December was in the opposite direction. The swarm was seen flying 1-2 meters above ground
level. The butterflies observed in the swarm were A. Albina, A. indra shiva (Moore, 1958), A.
wardii (Moore, 1884), Cepora nadina remba (Lucas, 1852), Graphium sarpedon
teredon (Felder & Felder, 1865) and Belenois aurota aurota (Fabricius, 1793). When it
comes to the species composition the A. albina was more in number throughout the
year.Similar to the Danainae butterflies the number of Albatrosses also reduced consistently
In November, 1–2 meters above ground, Catopsilia pomona pomona (Fabricius, 1775)
migration was seen in Nedugayam, flying from northeast to southwest. C. pomona pomona,
C. pyranthe pyranthe (Linnaeus, 1758) and Eurema hecabe hecabe (Linnaeus, 1758) were
the butterflies that were spotted in the swarm. C. pomona pomona was more prevalent
throughout the year in terms of species composition (Table 5). Similar to other butterflies, the
number of Emigrants also steadily declined over eight years (Fig 7) (Table 6). There is no
previous report about the migration of Common Emigrants from Nilambur region.
bochus (Stoll, 1782), Hypolimnas bolina jacintha (Drury, 1773) and Pachliopta aristolochiae
aristolochiae (Fabricius, 1775). The migration of J. bochus, was observed in Nadugani
during June 2020, from the South-West to the North-East direction. The swarm was noticed
from around 11:00 hrs to 12:30 hrs. Whereas the migration of H. bolina jacintha and P.
aristolochiae aristolochiae were seen migrating in Chungathara during April 2019, in South-
No
Fig. 7- Total number migratory butterflies each year from 2012- 2020
No.
septentrionis dravidarum (Fruhstorfer, 1899), Euploea core core (Cramer, 1780), Euploea
sylvester coreta (Godart, 1819), Danaus chrysippus chrysippus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Danaus
genutia genutia (Cramer, 1779) and Belenois aurota aurota (Fabricius, 1793))
1 2012 10903
2 2013 9270
3 2014 9100
4 2015 8200
5 2016 7980
6 2017 7400
7 2018 5114
8 2019 6255
9 2020 3998
septentrionis dravidarum (Fruhstorfer, 1899), Euploea core core (Cramer, 1780), Euploea
sylvester coreta (Godart, 1819), Danaus chrysippus chrysippus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Danaus
10 2012 10913
11 2013 9280
12 2014 9110
13 2015 8210
14 2016 7990
15 2017 7410
16 2018 5124
17 2019 6265
18 2020 4008
Swarm : Pieridae (Species involved— Appias (Catophaga) albina swinhoei (Moore, 1905),
Appias indra shiva (Moore, 1958), Cepora nadina remba (Lucas, 1852), Belenois aurota
aurota (Fabricius, 1793) and Graphium sarpedon teredon (Felder & Felder, 1865))
19 2012 2818
20 2013 2711
21 2014 2604
22 2015 2597
23 2016 2390
24 2017 2239
25 2018 2113
26 2019 1983
27 2020 1810
Swarm : Pieridae (Species involved— Appias (Catophaga) albina swinhoei (Moore, 1905),
Appias indra shiva (Moore, 1958), Cepora nadina remba (Lucas, 1852), Belenois aurota
aurota (Fabricius, 1793) and Graphium sarpedon teredon (Felder & Felder, 1865))
28 2012 2718
29 2013 2611
30 2014 2404
31 2015 2397
32 2016 2190
33 2017 2039
34 2018 1913
35 2019 1883
36 2020 980
Swarm : Pieridae (Species involved— Catopsilia pomona pomona (Fabricius, 1775),
Catopsilia pyranthe pyranthe (Linnaeus, 1758) and Eurema hecabe hecabe (Linnaeus, 1758))
37 2012 960
38 2013 840
39 2014 710
40 2015 655
41 2016 610
42 2017 590
43 2018 510
44 2019 490
45 2020 326
Diversity Indices
The diversity indices of butterflies are listed in Table 7. The diversity index of KWLS
(4.89) and the buffer zone (4.88) was similar (Table 8). KWLS (83.33) and buffer zone
(80.23) recorded similar values (Table 8) for Species richness. The evenness value of KWS
(0.81) was greater than the buffer zone (0.74) (Table 8).
Discussion
The KWLS and its buffer zone host a wide variety of habitats with undulating terrain
interspersed with extensive forests, this provides diverse ecological conditions. The study
shows that the region has high species diversity of butterflies. The butterflies of the region
Papilionidae species found from Kerala and Western Ghats, 76.47 % of Pierids in Western
Ghats and 81.25 % of Pierids in Kerala, 80 % of Nymphalidae in Western Ghats and 82.47 %
of Nymphalidae in kerala, 100 % of Riodinidae species in Western Ghats and Kerala, 79.59
% Lycaenids in the Western Ghats and 82.97 % of kerala and 81.70 % of Hesperiidae in
The region also hosts a good number of endemic butterflies, 18.08 % of butterflies
found in Nilambur were endemic in some way. It includes 14.39 % of Western Ghats
endemics and 1.84 % are super endemics to Nilagiri-Palani hills (Sadasivan & Sengupta, in
press 2023; Sadasivan et al. 2023). The region hosts 61.53 % of all the butterflies endemic to
Western Ghats. Additionally, there were several protected species in the study region.
Butterflies of Nilambur region consisted of 7.38% of species listed in IUCN Threatend List
of Threatened species, with 0.007% being listed under Nearly Threatend catogeory. That is
95.45 % of butterflies listed in IUCN Threatend List from Western Ghats. Out of the entire
butterfly fauna of Nilambur region 22.87 % were listed under WPA and its ammenments,
while the region holds 87.32 % of the species listed under WPA known from Western Ghats
The study on population status of butterflies of the region showed that 15.49 % were
very common, 29.15 % were common, 31.73 % were not rare, 17.71 % were rare and 5.90 %
The diversity and species richness of the KWLS and the buffer zone were similar,
indicating the ecological importance of the buffer zone. The buffer zone of KWLS (NNFD) is
understudied in terms of biodiversity, and this study shows that the biodiversity of the region
A comparison of butterfly diversity of the Nilambur region with other areas of the
Western Ghats revealed high diversity (Table 9). Only Silent Valley National Park and
Nilagiri Bioshpere Reserve reported a higher number of butterflies than the study region.
Butterfly migrations are known from various parts of the world. Several factors like
climate change, habitat fragmentation, forest fires, reduction of host plants in roosting sites
etc are known to negatively affect migrant butterfly populations and migration pattern
globally (Reppert and Roode 2018). This paper stands as the first study to report the decline
of migrant butterfly populations from India. Planning for the conservation of butterfly
migrants must be coordinated across time and space (Chowdhury et al. 2021). Hence more
decline in their populations (Misiukas et al. 2020). During this study, it was noticed that the
Karimpuzha Wildlife Sanctuary despite being an ecologically diverse and important region,
these challenges were not absent. Forest fires, anthropogenic factors like the use of pesticides
in nearby plantations, and invasive plants were alarming threats to butterflies, as well as the
whole biodiversity of the region, noticed during the study. KWLS being home to highly
diverse species of flora and fauna as well as located in the Western Ghats adjacent to the
Table 9 – A comparison of butterfly diversity of study region with other areas of Western
Ghats
butterflies
1 Silent Valley National Park and its environs 331 Sadasivan et al.
2023
et al. 2014
Rajasree 2012
2022
Pramod 2005
2 2004
Acknowledgements
We are extremely thankful to Dr. Muhammed Jaffer Palot (Zoological Survey of India) for all the
advice given during this study. The First author stand thankful Dr. John Mathew and Dr. Shivani
Jadeja from Krea University, Aleena Jolly (DTU, Denmark) and Rajat Anilkumar (KU, Denmark) for the
Wildlife Protection Act and its amendments till 2023 Schedule. ☆ in Schedules indicate that
the taxon is protected under the Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act 2002 under its old
Species (Scientific name and Common Name) POP* END** IUCN# WPA##
Family: Papilionidae
Lime Swallowtail
Common Jay
Swordtail
Narrow-banded Bluebottle
Mime
Lime Swallowtai
Swallowtail
Blue Mormon
Mormon
17 Papilio paris tamilana (Moore, 1881) — Sahyadri Paris C
Peacock
Peacock
Family: Pieridae
Gull
Common Gull
Orange-tip
Chocolate Albatross
Albatross
Albatross
Lemon Emigrant
Mottled Emigrant
Yellow
Grass Yellow
Puffin
Clouded Yellow
Family: Nymphaliade
Beak
Beak
Tiger
Tiger
Plain Tiger
Striped Tiger
Crow
King Crow
Black Crow
57 Charaxes psaphon imna (Butler, 1870) — Indian Plain NR II☆
Tawny Rajah
Nawab
White-bar Bushbrown
Long-brand Bushbrown
Bushbrown
Common Bushbrown
Dark-branded Bushbrown
Bushbrown
Common Treebrown
72 Lethe drypetis todara (Moore, 1881) — Dakhan Treebrown NR SI&SL
Treebrown
ring
Medus Brown
Evening Brown
Evening Brown
Evening Brown
Cruiser
Yeoman
Rustic
Common Leopard
86 Phalanta alcippe (Stoll, 1782) - Small Leopard R
Commander
Sergeant
Blackvein Sergeant
Common Lascar
Sailer
Chestnut-streaked Sailer
Sailer
Sailer
Dakhan Baron
101 Euthalia lubentina lubentina (Cramer, 1777) — Sahyadri NR
Gaudy Baron
Yellowjack Sailer
Grey Count
Castor
Common Castor
Black Prince
Admiral
Admiral
Pansy
114 Junonia almana almana (Linnaeus, 1758) — Oriental VC LC
Peacock Pansy
Pansy
Lemon Pansy
Eggfly
Redspot Duke
Family:Rionodidae
Judy
Double-banded Judy
Family: Lycanidae
Red Pierrot
Common Pierrot
Blue
Common Quaker
Malayan
Plains Cupid
Grass Blue
Blue
Blue
Ciliate Blue
Forget-me-not
Cerulean
Cerulean
157 Ionolyce helicon viola (Moore, 1877)— Sri Lankan Pointed NR WG&S II
Lineblue L
158 Nacaduba kurava canaraica (Toxopeus, 1927)— Karwar NR
Transparent Six-Lineblue
Six-Lineblue L
Pale Four-Lineblue
Opaque Six-Lineblue
Lineblue
Lineblue
White-tipped Lineblue
Silverstreak Blue
Leaf Blue
Many-tailed Oakblue
Large Oakblue
170 Arhopala centaurus pirama (Moore, 1881) —Centaur C
Oakblue
Oakblue
Oakblue
Sunbeam
Metallic Cerulean
Imperial
Royal
Royal
183 Tajuria cippus cippus (Fabricius, 1798) — Indian Peacock C II
Royal
Common Onyx
Common Tinsel
Orchid Tit
190 Zeltus amasa amasa (Hewitson, 1865) — Indian Fluffy Tit C PI&SL
Cornelian
Blue
Guava Blue
Flash
L
198 Bindahara moorei (Fruhstorfer, 1904) — Blue-bordered NR II☆
Plane
banded Silverline
Family:Hesperiidae
207 Bibasis sena sena (Moore, 1866) —Indian Orange-tail Awl R II☆
Orange Awlet
Green Awlet
Awl
White-banded Awl
213 Hasora vitta indica (Evans, 1932)— Indian Plain Banded R
Awl
Hopper
Bush Hopper
swift
Swift
Redeye
Chestnut Bob
229 Matapa aria (Moore, 1866) — Common Branded Red-Eye C
Philippine Swift
Philippine Swift
Partwing
Bob
244 Taractrocera ceramas (Hewitson, 1868) — Incomplete NR
Dart
Ace
Ace/Bicolor Ace
Flitter
Dartlet
Golden Angle
Angle
Spotted Flat
Spotted Flat
257 Coladenia indrani indra (Evans, 1926) — Dakhan Tricolor NR
Pied Flat
Yellow-breasted Flat
Marbled Skipper
Chestnut Angle
Flat
Snow Flat
PiedFlat
269 Ampittia dioscorides dioscorides (Fabricius, 1793) — Indian C
Bush Hopper
Reference
butterflies from Nilambur. 24th Swadeshi Science Congress 2014. Book of Abstracts.
from Chungathara, Nilambur and their life cycles. 26th Kerala Science Congress. Book
3. Arun P. R. 2003. Butterflies of Siruvani forests of, Western Ghats with notes on their
4. Bonebrake, Timothy C, Lauren C Ponisio, Carol L Boggs, Paul R. Ehrlich. 2021. More
than just indicators: a review of tropical butterfly ecology and conservation. Biological
5. Briscoe, M V. 1952. Butterfly migration in the Nilgiris. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 83:
456-458.
6. Champion H G, Seth S K. 1968. A Revised Survey of Forest Types of India, Govt. of
India Press, NewDelhi p. 404.FSI. Atlas Forest Type of India. Forest Survey of India,
Dehradun
11. Evans W H. 1949. A catalogue of the Hesperiidae from Europe, Asia, and Australia in
the British Museum (Natural History). British Museum of Natural History, London, 502
pp.
12. Evershed J. 1910. Note on migrations. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society. 20:
90-391
https://forest.kerala.gov.in/images/go/GO26220.pdf
14. Gaonkar H. 1996. Butterflies of the Western Ghats, India (including Sri Lanka: A
17. Larsen T B. 1978. Butterfly migrations in the Nilgiri Hills of South India. Journal of
(Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 84(1): 26–
19. Larsen T B. 1988. The butterflies of the Nilgiri mountains of southern India
(Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 85(1): 26–
43
21. Mathew George, Rahamathulla V K. 1993. Studies on the butterflies of silent valley
Peppara Wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala, India. Zoos’ Print Journal, 19(11), 1680-1683.
25. Mathew G. 2009. Insect diversity of New Amarambalam Reserve Forest in the Nilgiri
26. Mathew G. 2011. A Handbook on the Butterflies of Nilgiri Biosphere reserve. Kerala
27. Murrins M, Jennifer S C, Martin Herold. 2021. Tropical forest monitoring: Challenges
overview. In: First Indian Biodiversity Congress 2010. Book of Abstracts. No. 01.29
30. Royer R A, Austin J E, Newton W E. 1998. Checklist and “Pollard walk” butterfly
survey methods on public lands. The American midland naturalist, 140(2), 358-371.
32. Sadasivan K A. Sengupta. 2023. The butterflies of Western Ghats–their status and
Eravikulam National Park and its environs in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India.
Kochunarayanan B. 2023. Butterflies of Silent Valley National Park and its environs,
35. Seymoure Brett M. 2018. Enlightening Butterfly Conservation Efforts: The Importance
of Natural Lighting for Butterfly Behavioral Ecology and Conservation. Insects 9, no. 1:
22. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects9010022
40. Theng Meryl, Wan FA Jusoh, Anuj Jain, Blanca Huertas, David JX Tan, Hui Zhen Tan,
108401.
41. Williams C B.1938.The migration of butterflies in India. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 40:
439-457