Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Version 1.05
Flückiger Werner
Stocker Beat
E3 (MPT 03/14906/E)
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION 3
1. INTRODUCTION
It is generally accepted that material leakage and spillage from transfer points
considerably increase the operating costs of bulk material handling facilities.
In reality; after the conveyor design engineer has elaborated the conveyor layout, he will
go on to size critical items such as belts, idlers, motors, speed reducers, etc. and will
leave chute detailing to someone else. If the chute detailer has plenty of field experience
the resulting transfer point will work well. If not, the result can be a poor system. The
chute may not look radically different from a successful design, but performance
differences may be sufficient to create significant problems and loss of profit.
A close examination of the original designs of many transfer points gives the impression
that the designer was counting on some form of magic to induce the product to go in the
right direction. Either that, or it was hoped that the last rebound of product out of the
chute would, just by luck, be in the right direction.
With today’s available technology, these typical problems can and must be reduced to a
minimum. It is therefore required that properly designed and constructed feed and
discharge chutes must be installed.
A clear understanding of the flow of bulk solids within a chute is essential for rational
design.
The design of any type of conveying system must meet two basic requirements:
• the system objectives - in terms of capacity, conveying distance, product
distribution, etc.
• the characteristics of the bulk solids product in terms of flow properties,
abrasion resistance of chute materials, etc.
Considering what happens when product flows through the chute. Firstly, flow
through a chute is a transient phenomenon happening in a very short time.
What happens to the product coming off the feed belt:
• some of the fines float into the surrounding air-stream.
• some of the product sticks to the sides of the chute.
• some of the product gets carried back on the return belt.
• some of the product escapes from the chute and settles on the floor.
• at times product will block the chute and cause overflow.
• some of the fines end up in the head pulley and bearings.
• the balance of the product continues the journey to the next transfer point.
The material load should be fed by the chute work to a fully troughed belt, and
not in an area where the belt is undergoing transition. Also, provisions should be
made in the chute design to ensure that the material flow is centred onto the
receiving belt.
While accurate transition distances are available from the belting supplier, the
following «rules of thumb» have been used to estimate requirements. As a minimum
the skirt should not start until full troughing of belt has been achieved.
Fig. 6:
For Fabric Belt:
L = 1.0 x belt width for 20 degrees troughing idlers
L = 1.5 x belt width for 35 degrees troughing idlers
L = 2.0 x belt width for 45 degrees troughing idlers
For steel-cord belts:
L Double of L for fabric belts
Skirt-boards must be properly sized and distanced from the belt, to minimise
the possibility of material escaping from the loading point. They must also be
equipped with wear liners to help centre the material on the belt and to prevent
material from contacting and prematurely wearing the skirt-board sealing system.
Skirt-board and wear liner should be installed to provide relief in the direction of the
belt travel to prevent material entrapment. In cases where the design of the loading
point involves a dual chute wall construction, i.e.; where a space exists between the
interior chute wall and an outside chute wall, wear liner plates are not required.
Fig. 7: The steel to belt distance opens Fig. 8: Wedge-shaped loading chute
in the belt moves toward the exit of the
transfer point.
The skirt-board sealing system, in combination with a properly supported belt and
properly positioned chute wear liners must be able to contain small particles as well
as prevent the escape of material fines and dust from the load zone.
Dust curtain
To help increase the dust containment capabilities as well as decrease the amount
of air escaping the loading chute, the installation of dust curtains at the exit of the
chute work should be considered.
50 mm (2")
clearance for
load on belt
P DE DESG. 37
P DE 1/4"
Step chute
Material
centralization
plates
Fig. 17: Multiple rock boxes inside the chute Fig.18: Example grizzly bars inside the
loading chute
Impact
plates
(movable)
Anti-sticking
lining
Stainless
steel lining
Impact
chain
Fig. 22: Example skirt board sealing for coarse wet material
Adjustable
skirt plate
The product is carried toward the head pulley by the conveyor belt. If the belt is
running at a high enough speed, inertia will carry the product over the pulley in the
same direction, and at the same speed, as the belt. If the belt is running more slowly
the product tends to roll down the face of the pulley.
Discharge chute
Fig. 24: Example impact protection Fig. 25: Example impact protection
on chute by plastic lining on chute by rubber lining
Inspection openings
Very often flow problems within chutes and belt cleaner adjustment could be more
easily solved if the flow stream could be observed. Therefore observation is
necessary to enable appropriate adjustments to be made.
Many chutes have only one inspection door. This does not permit a view of the
actual flow path, the skirt area and the cleaner.
Sufficient accessible inspection doors shall be installed at any chute.
Such doors must be dust tight and located on the non-wearing side of the chute.
Depending on their location they must also be capable of withstanding the side
pressure from a plugged chute condition.
Chute design
The minimum valley angle shall correspond to the material characteristics but shall
not be less than 60°, expect for clinker, where a minimum valley angle of 50° is
acceptable.
All chutes, covered skirt-boards and hoods shall be designed for effective dust
suppression and shall be provided with flanged dust exhaust connections where
required.
Chute- and chute support connections shall be flanged and bolted and shall be
designed to facilitate ease of field erection and future replacement of parts.
Chutes shall be designed with removable top covers or large access doors for
replacement of the liner plates.
Chutes shall be constructed of a minimum 4 mm thick plate. Accessible inspection
doors shall be hinged and shall be held in closed position by quick release clamps.
Chute lining
All chutes handling clinker or other abrasive material shall be provided with rock
boxes and wear lining (Ni-hard or similar, approx. 20 mm thick).
Chutes handling sticky materials shall preferably be lined with low coefficient of
friction materials suitable for the application (UHMW polyethylene, stainless steel
etc.). As an alternative, heated chutes may be foreseen.
Appendix 1
T
V
C Factor
x b
O
- If factor K>1: the discharge point is on
the tangent point T.
R
2) Determination of parabola
5
m/se
c.
0,2se
8 0.8 0.8 3.136
0,3m c
4
3 0,1se
9 0.9 0.9 3.964
c
2
1
0,15m 10 1.0 1.0 4.900
0,049m
0,784m
0,441m
C
00
°
ø4
30,6
1 15° b
x
m
0,1
2
m
0,1
3
0,196m
m
0,1
4
Example 1 Example 2
0,441m
0,784m
v =1
2
sin x [°]
1
v=1
= 30.6°
v=1m/sec.
9.81 • 0.2
APPENDIX 2
1494 EXT.
PERNO ROSCADO DE 3/8" ø x 100
29 1436 C.a C. BARRS 29
LONG. C/TUERCA HEX. STD. Y
ROLDANA DE PRESION
35 1366 BASTIDOR 35
15
794 C.a C. BARRS
7
BARRS. 11/16" ø
35 35 P/TORNS. 5/8" ø
12
P DE 1/4"
40
30
12
6
84
54
150
80
15?
420
VER DET 1
30
258
P DE DESG. 37
855
843
P DE 1/4" 385 PL.
229
232
67 70 66
3 DECK.
SOL 1/4" x 2 1/2"
203
APS - 1 1/4" x 1/4"
APPENDIX 3
DETAIL 1 32 50
76
457
50
38
178
76
35°
150
229
SLOTTED HOLES
c 4 x 5,4 @ 1500 c/c RBT.
FOR ADJUSTEMENT
FULL LENGHT OF SKIRTBOARD
108
APPENDIX 4
APPENDIX 5