Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
Porphyry and high-sulfidation epithermal deposits form in dis-
tinct geologic and geochemical environments within magmatic-hy-
drothermal systems associated with intermediate to felsic magmas
(Hedenquist and Lowenstern, 1994). In porphyry deposits, dissem-
inated or stockwork Cu (6 Au and/or Mo) mineralization forms
within, or close to, an intrusive stock at depths .2 km and temper-
atures .350 8C. High-sulfidation epithermal deposits are located
mostly within extrusive rocks, as veins or structurally controlled ore-
bodies, and form at temperatures of ;150 –300 8C and depths ,1
km. Both deposit types share an association with advanced argillic
alteration, and a close spatial relation has been noted (Sillitoe, 1983,
1991) and used in the exploration for new ore deposits. However,
although suggested (Sillitoe, 1989), a genetic connection has not
been proven, in part because no chronological data exist to support
unambiguously a direct temporal relation between porphyry and
epithermal mineralization. If a genetic connection can be demon-
strated, this will have implications for the interpretation of ore-
forming processes related to high-level intrusions.
We report the results of K/Ar dating of mineral separates from
fresh and altered rocks from an area with closely related porphyry
and epithermal mineralization in the Mankayan mineral district of
northern Luzon, Philippines (Fig. 1). Coupled with the available
geologic data on the Lepanto enargite-Au deposit and the Far
Southeast (FSE) porphyry Cu-Au deposit, the K/Ar ages are used Figure 1. Map of Mankayan district in northern Luzon (inset), Philip-
pines, showing simplified geology and location and type of known hy-
to determine the timing of magmatism and associated Cu-Au min- drothermal deposits. Outlines of economically most important depos-
eralization and the life span of the ore-forming magmatic-hydro- its (i.e., FSE [Far Southeast], Guinaoang, and Lepanto) are shown
thermal system. projected to surface (based on Garcia, 1991).
Data Repository item 9517 contains additional material related to this article.
Figure 3. Radiometric ages for mineral separates from fresh and hy-
drothermally altered igneous rocks associated with Lepanto and Far
Southeast (FSE) deposits. Samples are arranged arbitrarily by litho-
logic or mineral groups, and by age (older to left) within each group.
Analytical uncertainty at 2s level is contained within size of symbols,
except where indicated with bar. Illite separates were concentrated in
<2 mm size fraction (<4 mm in three samples) and contain up to 20%
quartz 6 anhydrite 6 plagioclase 6 chlorite 6 sulfides. Hydrothermal
biotite separates (100 –150 mm size fraction) contain <10% chlorite.
Alunite separates were prepared by microdrilling and contain up to Figure 4. K/Ar age (Ma) vs. percentage of radiogenic 40Ar in total 40Ar
30% kaolinite 6 quartz. Igneous hornblende and biotite samples were released from hydrothermal minerals from Lepanto and Far Southeast
all fresh. Ranges of weight percent K concentration for different min- (FSE) deposits. Shaded regions represent premineralization and post-
eral groups are 0.18 6 0.01 to 0.30 6 0.02 for hornblende, 5.23 6 0.11 mineralization ages based on K/Ar dating of country rocks. Rectangles
to 7.47 6 0.15 for biotite, 4.42 6 0.09 to 7.46 6 0.15 for illite, and 2.90 indicate range of values for each mineral group, excluding alunite sam-
6 0.06 to 5.63 6 0.11 for alunite. ples with 40Arrad/S40Ar # 10%.