Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SELECTION OF AN AGENCY FOR IMPLEMENTATION, OPERATIONS & MAINTAINANCE OF THE NEXT PHASE OF THE CG DIAL – 112
PROJECT
Corrigendum - 2
1. Volume-1 Section 2. Glossary 15. Large IT Project 15. Large IT/ITeS Project
2.0
To be used for PQ criteria no. 7 & TQ To be used for PQ criteria no. 7 & TQ
Other 6.6 Pre-
criteria no. 4 criteria no. 4
impacted Qualification
sections: Criteria – Clause
No.7 The Bidder should have implemented The Bidder should have implemented
6.6 (Completed /Partially completed) a large IT (Completed /Partially completed) a large
6.7.1 6.7.1 Technical Bid project for any Central Government/ State IT/ITeS project for any Central Government/
Evaluation Criteria Government/ PSU/ Municipal Corporation/ State Government/ PSU/ Municipal
– Clause No. 4 substantially funded by Government having Corporation/ substantially funded by
the order value of minimum 75 crores (as Government having the order value of
sole or Lead Bidder) involving large IT minimum 75 crores (as sole or Lead Bidder)
Application Implementation and Post involving large IT Application
Implementation Support (including Implementation and Post Implementation
minimum 10 crores from Application Support (including minimum 10 crores from
development / customization / Application development / customization /
configuration and Operations & configuration and Operations &
maintenance of Software and maintenance of Software and
corresponding IT hardware) in last 5 years corresponding IT hardware) in last 5 years
as on bid submission date. as on bid submission date.
Page 2 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
Notes: Notes:
Project should have been Completed Project should have been Completed
/Partially completed in last five years, as on /Partially completed in last five years, as on
date of the bid submission. date of the bid submission.
Page 3 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
3. Volume-1 Section 6.6 Pre- 6.6 Pre-Qualification Criteria – Clause 6.6 Pre-Qualification Criteria – Clause
6.6, Qualification No.1,4,5,6 No.1,4,5,6
Criteria – Clause Clause to be read as: -
Other No.1,4,5,6
impacted Last five (5) Financial Years (i.e., 2017-18, Last five (5) Financial Years (i.e., 2018-19,
sections: 6.7.1 Technical Bid 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21 & 2021-22). 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-2023).
Evaluation Criteria
6.7.1, – Clause No. 1,2,3 6.6 Pre-Qualification Criteria – Clause 6.6 Pre-Qualification Criteria – Clause
12.4, No.1,4,5,6 No.1,4,5,6
12.7 12.4 Declaration
for Existence of Wherein the FY 2021-22 as the mandatory
The Firm requirement.
Page 4 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
4. Volume-1 Section 6.6 Pre- 6.6 Pre-Qualification Criteria – Clause 6.6 Pre-Qualification Criteria – Clause
6.6 Qualification No.1 No.1
Criteria
The Bidder(s) must be a registered The Bidder(s) must be a registered
company in India under any of the company in India under any of the following:
following:
5. Volume-1 Section 6.6 Pre- 6.6 Pre-Qualification Criteria – Clause 6.6 Pre-Qualification Criteria – Clause
6.6 Qualification No.8 - Experience in Call Center/ Safe/ No.8 - Experience in Call Center/ Safe/
Criteria Smart City project. Smart City/ICT project.
Page 5 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
Other 6.7.1 Technical Bid The Sole/Lead Bidder should have The Sole/Lead Bidder should have
impacted Evaluation Criteria implemented at least one 24*7 operational implemented at least one 24*7 operational
sections: call center (Contact Center Solution) with call center (Contact Center Solution) with
12.0 Annexures 2 - minimum 30 seaters in India for any minimum 30 seaters in India for any Central
6.7.1, Formats for Central Government/ State Government/ Government/ State Government/ PSU/
12.0, submission of the PSU/ Municipal Corporation/ substantially Municipal Corporation/ substantially funded
12.22 Pre-Qualification
funded by Government and same should by Government and same should be
Bid
be operational/completed in last 5 years as operational/completed in last 5 years as on
12.22 Bidder’s on date of bid submission. date of bid submission.
Experience - Call Or Or
Center/ Safe/
Smart City project The Sole/Lead Bidder should have The Sole/Lead Bidder should have
implemented Centralized Command implemented Centralized Command Center
Center of minimum 10 seats with 500 of minimum 10 seats with 500 active nodes
active nodes in Safe/Smart City project in in Safe/Smart City project/ICT Project in
India for any Central Government/ State India for any Central Government/ State
Government/ PSU/ Municipal Corporation/ Government/ PSU/ Municipal Corporation/
substantially funded by Government and substantially funded by Government and
same should be operational/completed in same should be operational/completed in
last 5 years as on date of bid submission. last 5 years as on date of bid submission.
Note: - The above mentioned change will
also be applicable to below sections:-:-
6. Volume-1 Section 6.6 Pre- 6.6 Pre-Qualification Criteria – Clause 6.6 Pre-Qualification Criteria – Clause
6.6, Qualification No.10 - Resource strength: No.10 - Resource strength:
Criteria The Technology Bidder (Sole/Lead Bidder) The Technology Bidder (Sole/Lead Bidder)
have at least Resource strength of 300 have at least Resource strength of 300
12.9 Resource
Strength – Human people out of which at least 50 people people out of which at least 20 people
Page 6 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
Other Resource should be technically qualified (BE/ B. should be technically qualified (BE/ B. Tech/
impacted Certificate Tech/ M. Tech/ MCA on firm’s payroll at M. Tech/ MCA on firm’s payroll at the time
section: the time of bid publication date (i.e. 12th of bid submission date.
June 2023)
12.9 Note: - Revised HR Certificate Format for
Note :- Along with HR Certificate, Bidder to as mentioned below in Annexure – 2
also share EPF Statement for the month of
April 2023, May 2023. The bidder has to submit Annexure-2 of this
corrigendum document instead of 12.9
Resource Strength – Human Resource
Certificate.
7. Volume-1 Section Technical Bid 6.7.1 Technical Bid Evaluation Criteria – 6.7.1 Technical Bid Evaluation Criteria –
6.7.1 Evaluation Criteria Clause No.- 7. Resource strength : – Clause No.- 7. Resource strength : –
Maximum Score – 5 Maximum Score – 10
Other 12.9 Resource
impacted Strength – Human The Technology Bidder (Sole/Lead Bidder)
section: Resource have at least Resource strength on firm’s
Certificate The Technology Bidder (Sole/Lead Bidder) payroll at the time of bid submission date
12.9 have at least Resource strength on firm’s
payroll at the time of bid publication date
(i.e. 12th June 2023) >=300 people & <400 people: 3 marks
>=400 people & <500 people: 4 marks
>=300 people & <400 people: 3 marks
>=500 people : 5 marks
>=400 people & <500 people: 4 marks
>=500 people : 5 marks The Technology Bidder (Sole/Lead Bidder)
have at least 20 technically qualified (BE/ B.
Tech/ M. Tech/ MCA on firm’s payroll at the
Note:- Along with HR Certificate, Bidder to time of bid submission date
also share EPF Statement for the month of
>=20 people & <30 people: 3 marks
April 2023, May 2023.
>=30 people & <40 people: 4 marks
>=40 people: 5 marks
Page 7 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
9. Volume-1 Section Technical Bid New Clause Proposed Resource from Sole/Lead Bidder
6.7.1 Evaluation Criteria (Payroll of the Bidder) - Maximum Score – 5
Page 8 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
10. Volume-1 Section 6.7.1 Technical Bid 6.7.1 Technical Bid Evaluation Criteria – 6.7.1 Technical Bid Evaluation Criteria –
6.7.1, Evaluation Criteria Clause No.-1- Turnover – Maximum Clause No.-1- Turnover – Maximum Score
Score – 15 – 10
Other 12.7 Statutory
impacted Auditor Certificate Average Annual Turnover during any 3 out Average Annual Turnover during any 3 out
section: – Financial Status
of the last 5 audited financial years (FY of the last 5 audited financial years (FY
of last Five years
Page 9 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
In the case of Consortium the Bidder In the case of Consortium, the Bidder
(Lead Bidder & Consortium member) (Lead Bidder & Consortium member)
should jointly have Overall Turnover should jointly have Overall Turnover
11. Volume-1 Section 6.7.1 Technical Bid 6.7.1 Technical Bid Evaluation Criteria – 6.7.1 Technical Bid Evaluation Criteria –
6.7.1 Evaluation Criteria Clause No.-2 - IT/ITES Turnover of the Clause No.-2 - IT/ITES Turnover of the
Other 12.7 Statutory Sole/Lead Bidder – Maximum Score – 15 Sole/Lead Bidder – Maximum Score – 10
impacted Auditor Certificate
During any 3 out of the last 5 audited During any 3 out of the last 5 audited
sections: – Financial Status
financial years (FY 2017-18, 2018-19, financial years (FY 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-
of last Five years
12.7 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22) 21, 2021-22,2022-23)
Page 10 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
12. Volume-2 Section Firewall 5. The appliance must have 2 x 5. The appliance must have 2 x redundant
6.2.2 redundant power supplies from day power supplies from day one.
one. Power supplies must be hot
swappable.
13. Volume-2 Section Firewall 6 The appliance must have hot 6 The appliance must have in-built FAN
6.2.2 swappable fans. to ensure sufficient cooling
14. Volume-2 Section Firewall 8 The proposed solution should support 8 The proposed solution should support
6.2.2 (minimum) (minimum)
b) Firewall Throughput (TCP) b) Firewall Throughput (UDP) - 20 Gbps
Realworld Throughput with all g) SSL VPN Throughput - 1 Gbps -
features enabled - 20 Gbps (Min) check point
g) SSL VPN Throughput - 1 Gbps - i) SSL Inspection Throughput - 1
check point Gbps - checkpoint
i) SSL Inspection Throughput - 1
Gbps - checkpoint
15. Volume-2 Section Firewall 9 The proposed vendor must have 9 The proposed vendor must have
6.2.2 "Recommended" rating in NSS LABS "Recommended" rating in NSS LABS
test with min 99% Evasion block test with min 98% Evasion block
capability and min 97.5% Security capability and min 97% Security
Effectiveness as per <2019 NSS Labs Effectiveness as per 2019 NSS Labs
Next Generation Firewall Test Report> Next Generation Firewall Test Report.
16. Volume-2 Section Firewall 31 Solution should be able to provide a 31 Solution should be able to provide a
6.2.2 complete trajectory of malware file complete trajectory of malware file
propagation which helps identify the propagation which helps identify the
targeted endpoint IP including the targeted endpoint IP including the
providing details of process and providing details of process and
trajectory of spread across trajectory.
endpoints without any agents
Page 11 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
17. Volume-2 Section Firewall 32 Solution should support at least 32 Solution should support at least
6.2.2 15,000+ IPS Signatures 10,000+ IPS Signatures
18. Volume-2 Section Firewall 42 The proposed solution must support 42 The proposed solution must support
6.2.2 different actions in the policy such as different actions in the policy such as
deny, drop, reset client/server deny, drop/reset client/server
19. Volume-2 Section Firewall 46 The proposed firewall should have the 46 The proposed firewall solution should
6.2.2 ability to create custom application have the ability to create custom
signatures and categories directly on application signatures and categories.
firewall without the need of any Also the device should have capability
third-party tool or technical support. to provide detailed information about
Also the device should have capability dependent applications to securely
to provide detailed information about enable an application.
dependent applications to securely
enable an application
20. Volume-2 Section Firewall 48 Firewall should have specific DNS 48. Firewall should have specific DNS
6.2.2 Security Signature Categories of Security Signature Categories support
domains based on the risk that to protect DNS based attack.
these domains pose should be able
to block DNS based attacks for
include C2 (encompasses DGA and
DNS tunnelling), malware, DDNS,
newly registered domains, and
phishing
21. Volume-2 Section Firewall 53 The proposed solution shall support 53 The proposed solution shall support
6.2.2 packet captures based on: - packet captures for troubleshooting
Applications -Unknown Applications based on Source IP, Destination IP,
-any threat -data- filters Port No etc.
Page 12 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
22. Volume-2 Section Firewall 55. The IPS capability of proposed OEM 55. The clause stands deleted
6.2.2 should have received NSS labs's
"Recommendation" rating of LATES
NGIPS test report
23. Volume-2 Section Firewall 63. IPS solution should have capability to 63. IPS solution should have capability to
6.2.2 protect against Denial of Service protect against Denial of Service (DOS)
(DOS) and DDOS attacks. Should and DDOS attacks. DOS and DDOS
have flexibility to configure protection should be applied, and
threshold values for each of the attacks stopped before firewall policy
Anomaly. DOS and DDOS protection look-ups.
should be applied and attacks stopped
before firewall policy look-ups.
24. Volume-2 Section Firewall 76. Should be able to scan any file 76. Should be able to scan any file upto
6.2.2 irrespective of it size. 100 MB
Page 13 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
Date: dd/mm/yyyy
To,
Police Headquarters,
Whereas M/s <<Name of Bidder>>, a company incorporated under the <<Act>>, its registered office at
…………………………. or (hereinafter called 'the Bidder') has submitted its Proposal dated -------------- for
“Selection of an agency for implementation, operations, and maintenance of next phase of the CG Dial-
112 ”.
1. If the Bidder withdraws its bid during the period of bid validity specified by the Bidder in the Bid
2. If the Bidder, having been notified of the acceptance of its Proposal by the Client during the period of
validity of Proposal, Bidder:
a. withdraws his participation from the Proposal during the period of validity of Proposal
document.
b. fails to extend the validity if required and as requested or
c. fails to produce Performance Bank Guarantee in case of award of tender within 15 days of
award of LOI or awarding contract whichever is earlier
We undertake to pay to the Client up to the above amount upon receipt of its first written demand, without
the Client having to substantiate its demand, provided that in its demand the Client will note that the
amount claimed by it is due to it owing to the occurrence of one or any or a combination of the above
conditions, specifying the occurred condition or conditions.
This guarantee will remain in force up to the period of bid validity and its validity should be extensible to
180 days beyond the bid validity date. Any demand in respect thereof should reach the Bank not later
than the above date.
Page 14 of 15
CG – Dial 112 Project (Next Phase) Corrigendum - 2
Date: dd/mm/yyyy
To,
Police Headquarters,
Dear Sir,
We have carefully gone through the Terms & Conditions contained in the RFP document for “Selection
of an agency for implementation, operations, and maintenance of next phase of the CG Dial-112
Project”. We hereby declare that our company <company’s name> has below mentioned Resource
strength as on date of bid submission date.
Yours sincerely,
__________________________________________
Signature of Authorized Signatory (with official seal)
Name :
Designation :
Address :
Telephone & Fax :
E-mail Address :
Page 15 of 15