Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The internationalization of finance and commerce has been brought about by the great advances
in transportation, communications, and information-processing technology. This development
introduces a dramatic new commercial reality—the global market for standardized consumer and
industrial products on a previously unimagined scale. It places primary emphasis on the one great
thing all markets have in common—the overwhelming desire for dependable, world-class
products at aggressively low prices. The international integration of markets also introduces the
global competitor, making firms insecure even in their home markets.
The transformation of the world economy has dramatic implications for business. Campuses have
students from many different countries. The chips in your laptop computer may have come from
Korea, the other hardware from China and its software could have been developed by Indian
engineers for a US branded computer. The concept of globalization refers to the increasing
connectivity and integration of countries and corporations and the people within them in terms of
their economic, political, and social activities. Because of globalization, multinational
corporations dominate the corporate landscape. A multinational corporation (MNC) produces and
sells goods or services in more than one nation. A prototypical example is the Coca-Cola
Company, which operates in more than 200 countries.
The doctrine of comparative advantage made an initial assumption that although the products of
economic activities could move internationally; the factors of production were relatively fixed in
a geographical sense. Land, labor and capital were assumed internationally immobile.
The fast growing of the cross-border business transactions in the second half of the last twentieth
century triggered the birth of multinational corporations, which is considered the most important
phenomena in the economic development in that century.
With growing operation of multinational corporations, a number of complexities arose in the area
of their financial decisions. Apart from the considerations of where, when and how to invest, the
decision concerning the management of working capital among their different subsidiaries and the
parent units became more complex, especially because the basic policies varied from one MNC
to another. Those MNCs that were more interested in maximizing the value of global wealth
adopted a centralized approach while those not interfering much with their subsidiaries believed
in a decentralized approach. Normally there is a mix of the two approaches in varying proportions,
for which the study of international finance has come to be more relevant.
Evolution of multinational corporations
Despite its increasing importance today, international business activity is not new. The transfer of
goods and services across national borders has been taking place for thousands of years, antedating
even Joseph’s advice to the rulers of Egypt to establish that nation as the granary of the Middle
East. Since the end of World War II, however, international business has undergone a revolution
out of which has emerged one of the most important economic phenomena of the latter half of the
twentieth century: the multinational corporation
International finance is the branch of economics that studies the dynamics of foreign exchange,
foreign direct investment and how these affect international trade. Also studies the international
projects, international investment and the international capital flow.
International Finance can be broadly defined, as the study of the financial decisions taken by a
multinational corporation in the area of international business i.e. global corporate finance.
International finance draws much of its background from the preliminary studies in the topics of
corporate finance such as capital budgeting, portfolio theory and cost of capital but now viewed
in the international dimension.
International finance is branch of economics that studies the dynamics of exchanges rates,
foreign investment and how these affect international trade. International finance covers all
procedures, techniques and tools that financial institutions, such as banks and insurance companies
provide to clients. These tools may include financing agreements and transaction strategies on
securities exchange. International finance is the study of the institutions, policies, and practices
that govern global financial management and/or financial aspects of global business.
Features of MNCs:
1. MNCs have managerial headquarters in home countries, while they carry out operations
in a number of other (host) countries.
2. A large part of capital assets of the parent company is owned by the citizens of the
company's home country.
3. The absolute majority of the members of the Board of Directors are citizens of the home
country.
4. Decisions on new investment and the local objectives are taken by the parent company.
5. MNCs are predominantly large-sized and exercise a great degree of economic dominance.
6. MNCs control production activity with large foreign direct investment in more than one
developed and developing countries.
7. MNCs are not just participants in export trade without foreign investments.
Based in part on the development of modern communications and transportation technologies, the
rise of the multinational corporation was unanticipated by the classical theory of international
trade as first developed by Adam Smith and David Ricardo. According to this theory, which rests
on the doctrine of comparative advantage, each nation should specialize in the production and
export of those goods that it can produce with highest relative efficiency and import those goods
that other nations can produce relatively more efficiently. Underlying this theory is the assumption
that goods and services can move internationally but factors of production, such as capital, labour,
and land, are relatively immobile. Furthermore, the theory deals only with trade in commodities
that is, undifferentiated products; it ignores the roles of uncertainty, economies of scale,
transportation costs, and technology in international trade; and it is static rather than dynamic. For
Classical trade theory implicitly assumes that countries differ enough in terms of resource
endowments and economic skills for those differences to be at the centre of any analysis of
corporate competitiveness. Differences among individual corporate strategies are considered to be
of only secondary importance; a company’s citizenship is the key determinant of international
success in the world of Adam Smith and David Ricardo.
Against this background, the ability of corporations of all sizes to use these globally available
factors of production is a far bigger factor in international competitiveness than broad
macroeconomic differences among countries. Contrary to the postulates of Smith and Ricardo, the
very existence of the multinational enterprise is based on the international mobility of certain
factors of production. Capital raised in London on the Eurodollar market may be used by a Swiss-
based pharmaceutical firm to finance the acquisition of German equipment by a subsidiary in
Brazil. A single Barbie doll is made in 10 countries—designed in California; with parts and
clothing from Japan, China, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Indonesia, Korea, Italy, and Taiwan; and
assembled in Mexico and sold in 144 countries.
The value added in a particular country product development, design, production, assembly, or
marketing depends on differences in labour costs and unique national attributes or skills. Although
trade in goods, capital, and services and the ability to shift production act to limit these differences
in costs and skills among nations, differences nonetheless remain based on cultural predilections,
historical accidents, and government policies. Each of these factors can affect the nature of the
competitive advantages enjoyed by different nations and their companies. For example, at the
moment, the United States has some significant competitive advantages. For one thing,
individualism and entrepreneurship characteristics that are deeply ingrained in the American spirit
are increasingly a source of competitive advantage as the creation of value becomes more
knowledge intensive. When inventiveness and entrepreneurship, along with a culture of openness
and innovation, are combined with abundant risk capital, superior graduate education, better
infrastructure, and an inflow of foreign brainpower, it is not surprising that U.S. companies from
Boston to Austin, from Silicon Alley to Silicon Valley dominate world markets in software,
biotechnology, Internet-related business, microprocessors, aerospace, and entertainment. Also,
U.S. firms are moving rapidly forward to construct an information superhighway and related
multimedia technology, whereas their European and Japanese rivals face continued regulatory and
bureaucratic roadblocks. Recent experiences also have given the United States a significant
competitive advantage. During the 1980s and 1990s, fundamental political, technological,
regulatory, and economic forces radically changed the global competitive environment. A brief
listing of some of these forces includes the following:
- Massive deregulation
- The collapse of communism
- The sale of hundreds of billions of dollars of state-owned firms around the world in
massive privatizations designed to shrink the public sector
- The revolution in information technologies
- The rise in the market for corporate control with its waves of takeovers, mergers, and
leveraged buyouts
These forces have combined to usher in an era of brutal price and service competition. The United
States is further along than other nations in adapting to this new world economic order, largely
because its more open economy has forced its firms to confront rather than hide from competitors.
Perhaps the most dramatic change in the international economy over the past three decades has
been the rise of China as a global competitor. From 1978, when Deng Xiaoping launched his
country’s economic reform program, to 2010, China’s gross domestic product rose by more than
3200%, an annual rate of 11%, the most rapid growth rate by far of any country in the world during
this 33-year period. Since 1991, China has attracted the largest amount of foreign investment
(FDI) among developing countries each year, with annual foreign investment by the late 1990s
exceeding $50 billion. Since 2002, China has been the world’s number-two destination (the United
States is number one) for foreign direct investment (FDI), which is the acquisition abroad of
companies, property, or physical assets such as plant and equipment, attracting over $105 billion
in FDI flows in 2010. About 400 out of the world’s 500 largest companies, employing 16 million
workers in 2008, have now invested in China.
Worldwide, the stock of FDI reached an estimated $18.9 trillion in 2010. Moreover, these
investments have grown steadily over time, facilitated by a combination of factors: falling
regulatory barriers to overseas investment; rapidly declining telecommunications and transport
costs; and freer domestic and international capital markets in which vast sums of money can be
raised, companies can be bought, and currency and other risks can be hedged. These factors have
made it easier for companies to invest abroad, to do so more cheaply, and to experience less risk
than ever before.
Thus, the greater a firm’s international investment, the riskier its operations should be. Yet, there
is good reason to believe that being multinational may actually reduce the riskiness of a firm.
Much of the systematic or general market risk affecting a company is related to the cyclical nature
of the national economy in which the company is domiciled. Hence, the diversification effect
resulting from operating in a number of countries whose economic cycles are not perfectly in
phase should reduce the variability of MNC earnings.
The theory of absolute advantage destroys the mercantilistic idea that international trade is a zero-
sum game. According to the absolute advantage theory, international trade is a positive-sum game,
because there are gains for both countries to an exchange. Unlike mercantilism this theory
measures the nation's wealth by the living standards of its people and not by gold and silver. There
is a potential problem with absolute advantage. If there is one country that does not have an
absolute advantage in the production of any product, will there still be benefit to trade, and will
trade even occur? The answer may be found in the extension of absolute advantage, the theory of
comparative advantage.
2. Theory of Comparative Advantage
The most basic concept in the whole of international trade theory is the principle of comparative
advantage, first introduced by David Ricardo in 1817. It remains a major influence on much
international trade policy and is therefore important in understanding the modern global economy.
The principle of comparative advantage states that a country should specialize in producing and
exporting those products in which is has a comparative, or relative cost, advantage compared with
other countries and should import those goods in which it has a comparative disadvantage. Out of
such specialisation, it is argued, will accrue greater benefit for all.
In this theory there are several assumptions that limit the real-world application. The assumption
that countries are driven only by the maximization of production and consumption, and not by
issues out of concern for workers or consumers is a mistake.
3. Heckscher-Ohlin Theory
In the early 1900s an international trade theory called factor proportions theory emerged by two
Swedish economists, Eli Heckscher and Bertil Ohlin. This theory is also called the Heckscher
Ohlin theory. The Heckscher-Ohlin theory stresses that countries should produce and export goods
that require resources (factors) that are abundant and import goods that require resources in short
supply.
The Heckscher-Ohlin theory is preferred to the Ricardo theory by many economists, because it
makes fewer simplifying assumptions. In 1953, Wassily Leontief published a study, where he
tested the validity of the Heckscher-Ohlin theory. The study showed that the U.S was more
abundant in capital compared to other countries, therefore the U.S would export capital- intensive
goods and import labour-intensive goods. Leontief found out that the U.S's export was less capital
intensive than import.
4. Product Life Cycle Theory
Raymond Vernon developed the international product life cycle theory in the 1960s. The
international product life cycle theory stresses that a company will begin to export its product and
later take on foreign direct investment as the product moves through its life cycle. Eventually a
country's export becomes its import. Although the model is developed around the U.S, it can be
generalised and applied to any of the developed and innovative markets of the world.
The product life cycle theory was developed during the 1960s and focused on the U.S since most
innovations came from that market. This was an applicable theory at that time since the U.S
dominated the world trade. Today, the U.S is no longer the only innovator of products in the world.
Today companies design new products and modify them much quicker than before. Companies
are forced to introduce the products in many different markets at the same time to gain cost
benefits before its sales declines. The theory does not explain trade patterns of today.
5. Theory of Mercantilism
According to Wild, 2000, the trade theory that states that nations should accumulate financial
wealth, usually in the form of gold, by encouraging exports and discouraging imports is called
mercantilism. According to this theory other measures of countries' well being, such as living
standards or human development, are irrelevant. Mainly Great Britain, France, the Netherlands,
Portugal and Spain used mercantilism during the 1500s to the late 1700s.
Mercantilistic countries practiced the so-called zero-sum game, (situation in which one
participant's gains result only from another participant's equivalent losses. The net change in total
wealth among participants is zero; the wealth is just shifted from one to another.) which meant
that world wealth was limited and that countries only could increase their share at expense of their
neighbors. The economic development was prevented when the mercantilistic countries paid the
colonies little for export and charged them high price for import. The main problem with
mercantilism is that all countries engaged in export but was restricted from import, prevention
from development of international trade
Nevertheless, there are problems associated with Transfer Pricing. Many governments do not like
transfer pricing strategy. When transfer prices are used to reduce a firm’s tax liabilities or import
duties, most governments feel they are being cheated of their legitimate income. Several
governments limit the ability of an international business to manipulate transfer prices.
11. International Taxation:
Taxes have a significant impact on areas, as diverse as making foreign investment decisions,
managing exchange risks, planning capital structures, determining financing costs and managing
inter affiliate funds flows. For the international business with activities in many countries, the
various treaties have important implications for how the international company should structure
its internal payments system among the foreign subsidiaries and the parent company.
12. Economic and Currency Crisis:
The Asian crisis, Malaysian crisis, Pacific-Rim country crisis are in relation to economic crisis
wherein they have experienced. RECESSION and ADVERSE, BALANCE OF PAYMENTS
position. The same countries along with Japan experienced currency crisis in that the value of
currencies were either depreciated or devalued and further they were exposed to shortage of
foreign exchange reserves.
13. Interest Rates Charging:
The rate of interest charged by World Bank on its loans disbursed is 7.5 per cent p.a. and Asian
Development Bank’s concessional interest rate is 4 per cent p.a. The equity cost of capital is less
when compared to debt funds in the global capital market. The increasing interest rate raises cost
of capital and profitability of the company is lessened interest rate is a parameter in global finance
which plays a dominant role in production and operational risks of global corporates.
14. Foreign Exchange Risk:
Exchange Rate refers to the price of one currency against another currency. The exchange of
currency happens in two ways ie fixed exchange rate and floating exchange rate. The exchange
rate risk is more pronounced under flexible or floating exchange rate. This is because floating
exchange rate is based on market forces of DEMAND for and SUPPLY of foreign currencies, at
a particular time Trade surplus/deficit vis-a-vis the currencies of the countries, a host of economic
factors like GNP, Fiscal Deficit, balance of payments position. Industrial production data, and
employment data, inflation rate differentials and interest rate differentials.
15. Cold war between countries:
The enmity, animosity, difference of opinion between and among countries be routed out at the
surface level. Hatred is external while jealousy is internal. The cold war among nations is because
of the twin pests — hatred and jealousy between the countries in the world.
16. Operational risks:
The operational risk encompasses commercial risks, foreign exchange risk, political risks and
country specific risks. Different currencies, payments and receipts socioeconomic systems, laws,
habits, tasks preferences, and environmental aspects lead to higher risks in the form of credit,
market access, currency and exchange risks.