Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Manufactured In-house
Manufactured by Outsourcing manufacturing the process, or
Purchased from the market
5. Performance Review
The last step in the process of capital budgeting is reviewing the investment. Initially, the
organization had selected a particular investment for a predicted return. So now, they will
compare the investments expected performance to the actual performance.
In our example, when the screening for the most profitable investment happened, an expected
return would have been worked out. Once the investment is made, the products are released in the
market, the profits earned from its sales should be compared to the set expected returns. This will
help in the performance review.
5. Profitability Index
Profitability Index is the ratio of the present value of future cash flows of the project to the initial
investment required for the project.
Each technique comes with inherent advantages and disadvantages. An organization needs to use
the best-suited technique to assist it in budgeting. It can also select different techniques and
compare the results to derive at the best profitable projects.
Conclusion
Capital budgeting is a predominant function of management. Right decisions taken can lead the
business to great heights. However, a single wrong decision can inch the business closer to shut
down due to the number of funds involved and the tenure of these projects.
The main objective of the firm is to maximize profit either by way of increased revenue or by cost
reduction. Broadly, there are two types of capital budgeting decisions which expand revenue or
reduce cost.
Importance of Capital Budgeting decisions
The following are the objectives of capital budgeting;
1. Involves commitment of large amount of funds in the firm
2. Are irreversible (projects) at substantial loss
3. They influence the firm growth in the long run (future)
Initial investment
Consumer demand
Price
Variable cost
Fixed cost
Project lifetime
Fund transfer restriction
There are various factors related to a MNC that may affect its cost of capital, including:
Size of the firm
Access to international capital markets
International diversification
Tax concessions
Exchange rate risk
Country risk
POLITICAL RISK – is the exposure to a change in the value of an investment or cash position
resulting from government actions – the change in value could be positive or negative.
a) Checklist approach
b) Delphi techniques
c) Quantitative analysis
d) Inspection visits
e) Combination of techniques
a) CHECKLIST APPROACH
It involves judgment of the political and financial factors (both macro and micro) that contribute
to a firm’s assessment of country risk such as real GNP growth which can be measured from
available data while others such as probability of entering into a war must be subjectively
measured.
The factors should then be converted to some numerical (indices) form in which they can be
assessed for a particular country.
Those factors thought to have a greater influence on country risk should be assigned greater
weights.
Scores are aggregated and updated regularly as the world political environment changes countries
are then rated as to:
Minimal risk ( 0 to 19 rating points)
Acceptance risk (20 to 34 rating points)
High risk (35 to 44) rating points
Prohibitive risk( > 45) rating points
b) DELPHI TECHNIQUE
Involves collection of independent opinions on country risk without group discussion by the
assessors who provided these opinions. The assessors here may be employees of the firm
conducting the assessment or outside consultants.
The MNC can oversee these country risk scores in some manner and even assess the degree of
disagreement by measuring dispersions of opinions.
c) QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
Attempts to identify the characteristic that influence the level of country risk.
They include;
Discriminant analysis, a statistical tool.
Regression analysis, measures sensitivity of one variable to other variables.
d) INSPECTION VISITS
Involves travelling to country and meeting with government officials, firm executives and
consumers.
e) COMBINATION OF TECHNIQUES
Could use one or more of the above techniques since each technique has is strengths and
weaknesses.
In capital budgeting for a foreign project, a higher discount rate should be used for the countries
with low risk ratings (high risk countries)
Even after a project is accepted and implemented, country risk must continue to be monitored.
Political risk may be controlled at the pre- investment stage or in the course of operations or both.
1. Cannibalization.
When Honda introduced its Acura line of cars, some customers switched their purchases from the
Honda Accord to the new models. This example illustrates the phenomenon known as
cannibalization, a new product taking sales away from the firm’s existing products.
Cannibalization also occurs when a firm builds a plant overseas and winds up substituting foreign
production for parent company exports. To the extent that sales of a new product or plant just
replace other corporate sales, the new project’s estimated profits must be reduced by the earnings
on the lost sales.
2. Sales Creation.
Black & Decker, the U.S. power tool company, significantly expanded its exports to Europe after
investing in European production facilities that gave it a strong local market position in several
product lines. Similarly, GM’s auto plants in Britain use parts made by its U.S. plants, parts that
would not otherwise be sold if GM’s British plants disappeared. In both cases, an investment either
created or was expected to create additional sales for existing products. Thus, sales creation is the
opposite of cannibalization.
3. Opportunity Cost.
Suppose IBM decides to build a new office building in Sao Paulo on some land it bought 10 years
ago. IBM must include the cost of the land in calculating the value of undertaking the project.
Also, this cost must be based on the current market value of the land, not the price it paid 10 years
ago. This example demonstrates a more general rule. Project costs must include the true economic
cost of any resource required for the project, regardless of whether the firm already owns the
resource or has to go out and acquire it. This true cost is the opportunity cost, the maximum amount
of cash the asset could generate for the firm should it be sold or put to some other productive use.
4. Transfer Pricing.
By raising the price at which a proposed Ford plant in Dearborn,
Michigan, will sell engines to its English subsidiary, Ford can increase the apparent profitability
of the new plant but at the expense of its English affiliate. Similarly, if Matsushita lowers the price
at which its Panasonic division buys microprocessors from its microelectronics division, the
latter’s new semiconductor plant will show a decline in profitability. These examples demonstrate
that the transfer prices at which goods and services are traded internally can significantly distort
the profitability of a proposed investment. Whenever possible, the prices used to evaluate project
inputs or outputs should be market prices. If no market exists for the product, then the firm must
evaluate the project based on the cost savings or additional profits to the corporation of going
ahead with the project.