You are on page 1of 12

 3rd variable problem (lurking

Scientific Foundations of variable)– diff. variable is responsible


Psych (10-14%) for relationship (breast implants &
• Psychology is derived from physiology suicide)
(biology) and philosophy  Illusory correlation – belief of
• EARLY APPROACHES correlation that doesn’t exist (periods
o Structuralism – used INTROSPECTION don’t actually sync)
(act of looking inward to examine • SURVEYS: usually turned into
1870s

mental experience) to determine the correlation. Subject to:


underlying STRUCTURES of the mind o Social desirability – ppl lie to look
o Functionalism – need to analyze the  Double-Blind: Exp. where neither the good
PURPOSE of behavior participant or the experimenter are o Wording effects – how you frame
• APPROACHES KEY WORDS aware of which condition people are the question can impact your
o Psychoanalytic/dynamic – unconscious, assigned to (drug studies) answers (see Loftus in Cognition)
 Single-Blind: only participant blind – • NATURALISTIC OBSERVATION:

childhood
o Behavioral – learned, reinforced used if experimenter can’t be blind Adv: real world validity (observe people
o Humanistic – free will, choice, ideal, (gender, age, etc) in their own setting) Disadv: No cause
actualization o Quasi-experimental design – and effect
o Cognitive – Perceptions, thoughts random assignment to conditions • CASE STUDY:
o Evolutionary – Genes is impossible (can’t randomly Adv. Studies ONE person (usually) in
o Biological – Brain, NTs assign gender) great detail – lots of info Disadv: No
Today

o Sociocultural – society • Operational Definition: clear, precise, cause and effect


o Biopsychosocial – combo of above typically quantifiable definition of your • DESCRIPTIVE STATS:shape of the data
• PEOPLE: variables – allows replication o Measures of Central Tendency:
o Mary Calkins: First Fem. Pres. of APA • Confound: error/ flaw in study  Mean: Average (use in normal
o Margaret Floy Washburn–1st fem. PhD • Random Assignment: assigns distribution)
o Charles Darwin: Natural selection & participants to either control or  Median: Middle # (use in skewed
evolution experimental group at random –increase distribution)
o Dorothea Dix: Reformed mental chance of equal representation among  Mode: occurs most often
institutions in U.S. groups (spreads the lefties across both • Skews – created by outlers
o Stanley Hall: 1st pres. of APA1st journal groups) o Neg skew = left skew
o William James: Father of American • Random Sample (selection): method for o Pos skew = right skew
2 dads

Psychology – functionalist choosing participants for your study –


o Wilhelm Wundt: Father of Modern everyone has a chance to take part,
Psychology – structuralist increases generalizability
• RANDOM TERMS o Assignment and sampling can be
o Basic research – purpose is to increase done via names in a hat, computer
knowledge (rats) generation, etc
o Applied research – purpose is to help • Representative Sample: Sample mimics
people the general pop. (ethnic, gender, age)
o Psychologist – research or counseling – • Stratified Sampling: if you need to
MS or PhD ensure a rep. sample you can separate
o Psychiatrist – prescribe medications and your population before you sample (ex.
diagnose – M.D. make sure get 80% women, 20% men)
Research Design • CORRELATION:
• EXPERIMENT : Adv: identify relationship between two
Adv: researcher controls variables to variables Disadv: No cause and effect
establish cause and effect Disadv: (CORRELATION DOES NOT EQUAL
difficult to generalize CAUSATION) • INFERENTIAL STATISTICS:
o Independent Variable: purposefully o Positive Correlation – variables establishes significance (meaningfulness)
altered by researcher to look for effect increase & decrease together • STATISTICAL SIGNIFANCE = results
 Experimental Group: received the o Negative Correlation – as one not due to chance, exp.manipulation
treatment (part of the IV); can have variable increases the other decreases caused the difference in means
multiple exp, groups o The stronger the # the stronger the • ETHICAL GUIDELINES (IRB
 Control Group: placebo, baseline relationship REGARDLESS of the APPROVAL NEEDED FOR PPL)
(part of the IV); can only have 1 pos/neg sign. Cannot be < or > than 1. o Confidentiality: names kept secret
 Placebo Effect: show behaviors o Stronger relationships = tighter o Informed Consent: must agree to be
associated with the exp. group when clusters on graph part of study
having received placebo o Debriefing: must be told the true
o Dependent Variable: measured purpose of the study (done after for
variable (is DEPENDENT on the deception)
independent variable) o Deception must be warranted
o No harm– mental/physical
o Dopamine: Reward & movement  Somatosensory Cortex: map of our
Biological Basis o Serotonin: Moods and emotion touch receptors –in parietal lobe *can
(8-10%) o Acetylcholine (ACh): Memory only mention touch in FRQ
*NT = neurotransmitter, AP = action o Epinephrine & Norepinephrine:  Motor Cortex: map of our motor
potential, NS = nervous system sympathetic NS arousal receptors – located in frontal lobe
• NEURON: Basic cell of the NS o Endorphins: pain control o Left hemisphere only – damage results
o Dendrites: Receive incoming NTs o Oxytocin: love and bonding in aphasia (damaged speech)
o Soma: Cell body (includes nucleus) • Agonist: drug that mimics a NT  Broca’s Area: Inability to produce
o Axon: AP travels down this • Antagonist: drug that blocks a NT speech (Broca – Broken speech)
o Myelin Sheath: speeds up AP down • Reuptake: Unused NTs are taken back up  Wernicke’s Area: can’t comprehend
axon, protects axon, MS destroys this into the sending neuron. SSRIs (selective speech (Wernicke’s what?)
o Terminals: release NTs – send signal serotonin reuptake inhibitors) block o Corpus Callosum: bundle of nerves that
onto next neuron reuptake – treatment for depression connects the 2 hemispheres – sometimes
o Vesicles: sacs inside terminal contain severed in patients with severe seizures –
NTs (rhymes w/?) leads to “split-brain patients”
o Synapse: gap b/w neurons  Split-brain experiments: done by Sperry
• Action Potential: movement of Na and K & Gazzaniga.
ions across membrane sends an electrical
charge down the axon (more Na outside –
like a salty banana)
o All or none law: stimulus must trigger
the AP past its threshold, but does not
increase the intensity of the response
(flush the toilet) Image shown to R
o Refractory period: neuron must rest • AREAS OF THE BRAIN: eye processed in L hemi – patient can
and reset before it can send another • Hindbrain: oldest part of the brain say what they saw; image shown to L
AP (toilet resets o Cerebellum – movement/balance eye processed in R hemi, can’t say
(walking a tightrope balancing a bell) what was seen
o Medulla – vital organs (HR, BP) • BRAIN PLASTICITY: Brain can “heal”
o Pons – bridge b/w regions – basic itself (brain is malleable)
functions • NATURE VS. NURTURE: ANSWER
• Midbrain IS BOTH
o Reticular formation: alertness o Twin Studies:
• Forebrain: higher thought processes  Identical twins – Monozygotic (MZ)
o Limbic System  Fraternal twins – Dizygotics (DZ)
 Amygdala: emotions, fear (Amy, da! o Genetics: MZ twins will have a higher
You’re so emotional!) percentage of also developing a disease
 Hippocampus: memory (if you saw a o Environment: MZ twins raised in
• Sensory neurons – receive sense signals hippo on campus you’d remember it!) different environments show differences
 Hypothalamus: Reward/pleasure • ENDOCRINE SYSTEM: sends
• Afferent neurons brainAccepts signals center, eating behaviors – link to hormones throughout the body
• Motor neurons – signals to move endocrine system o Pituitary Gland: Controlled by
o Thalamus: relay center for all but smell hypothalamus. release growth hormones
• Efferent neurons – signal Exits brain (you MUST (thalaMUST) use your o Adrenal Glands: related to sympathetic
• Interneurons – cells in spinal cord thalamus, unless its MUSTY – smell) NS: releases adrenaline
responsible for reflex loop • BRAIN IMAGING:
• CENTRAL NS: Brain and spinal cord o EEG: brain activity – not specific
• PERIPHERAL NS: Rest of the NS o XRAY: not useful, doesn’t show tissues
o Somatic NS: Voluntary movement o CT / MRI: shows structures (tumors)
o Autonomic NS: Involuntary (heart, o PET: glucose shows brain activity (when
lungs, etc) in doubt pick this one)
increase / decrease) for FRQ
Must include bio response (HR

 Sympathetic NS: Arouses the body for o fMRI: oxygen shows activity: real time
fight/flight (generally activates – o lesion – destruction of brain tissue
sympathetic to you getting eaten by a • STATES of CONSCIOUSNESS:
tiger helps you run away) o Cerebral Cortex: outer portion of the o Higher-Level: controlled processes –
 Parasympathetic NS: established brain – higher order thought processes totally aware
homeostasis after a sympathetic  Occipital Lobe: vision – mom’s eyes! o Lower-Level: automatic processing
response (generally inhibits)  Frontal Lobe: decision making, (daydreaming, phone numbers)
• NEUROTRANSMITTERS (NT): planning, judgment, movement, o Altered States: produced through drugs,
Chemicals released in synaptic gap, personality fatigue, hypnosis
received by neurons  Parietal Lobe: sensations o Subconscious: Sleeping and dreaming
o GABA: Major inhibitory NT  Temporal Lobe: hearing and face o No awareness: Knocked out
o GlutamatE: Major Excitatory NT recognition
(glutes excite you!)
• SLEEP: o Dependence: Become addicted to the
Beta Waves: awake (you betta be awake drug – must have it to avoid withdrawal
for the exam) symptoms
Alpha Waves: high amp., drowsy o Withdrawal: Psychological and
NREM (non REM) stages- physiological symptoms associated
Stage 1: light sleep with sudden stoppage. Unpleasant –
Stage 2: bursts of sleep spindles can kill you.
Stage 3 Delta waves: Deep sleep Sensation & Perception
Rapid Eye Movement (REM): • THEORIES OF COLOR VISION:
dreaming, cognitive processing (6 – 8%) o Trichromatic – three cones for
Entire cycle takes 90 minutes, REM • ABSOLUTE THRESHOLD: detection of receiving color (blue, red, green)
occurs inb/w each cycle. REM lasts signal 50% of time (is it there)  Explains color blindness - they are
longer throughout the night missing a cone type
• DIFFERENCE THRESHOLD
o Opponent Process – complementary
(also called a just noticeable
colors are processed in ganglion cells –
difference (JND) and follows
explains why we see an after image
WEBER’S LAW: two stimuli must
differ by a constant minimum • Visual Capture: Visual system
proportion. (Can you tell a change overwhelms all others (nauseous in an
(stronger / weaker?) IMAX theater – vision trumps vestibular)
• SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY: • Constancies: recognize that objects do
detection depends on experience, not physically change despite changes in
• CIRCADIAN RHYTHM: 24 hour sensory input (size, shape, brightness)
biological clock of Body temp & sleep expectations, alertness, etc. (more likely
to notice a door slam outside when • Phi Phenomenon: adjacent lights blink
o Controlled by the Suprachiasmatic on/off in succession – looks like
nucleus (SCN) in the brain waiting on the pizza guy)
• Sensory Adaptation: diminished movement (traffic signs with arrows)
o Explains jet lag
sensitivity as a result of constant • Stroboscopic movement: motion
• SLEEP DISORDERS produced by a rapid succession of slightly
o Insomnia: Inability to fall asleep (due stimulation (can you feel your
underwear?) varying images (animations)
to stress/anxiety)
• Sensory Habituation: diminished • MONOCULAR CUES (how we form a
o Sleep walking/talking: (due to fatigue,
sensitivity due to regular exposure (do 3D image from a 2D image)
drugs, alcohol) – NOT during REM
you notice the train?) o Interposition:
o Night terrors: extreme nightmares –
• Perceptual Set: tendency to see overlapping
NOT in REM sleep – typical in
something as part of a group – speeds up images appear
children
signal processing closer
o Narcolepsy: fall asleep out of nowhere
o Relative Size:
(due to deficiency in orexin)
2 objects that
o Sleep Apnea: stop breathing suddenly
are usually similar in size, the smaller
while asleep (due to obesity usually)
one is further away
• DREAM THEORIES: o Linear
o Freud’s Unconscious Wish • Inattentional Blindness: failure to notice Perspective:
Fulfillment: Dreaming is gratification something added b/c you’re so focused on parallel lines
of unconscious desires and needs another task (gorilla video) converge with
 Latent Content: hidden meaning • Change Blindness: failure to notice a distance
 Manifest Content: obvious storyline change in the scene (door study) (think railroad
• Activation Synthesis: Brain produces • Cocktail party effect: notice your name tracks)
random bursts of energy – stimulating across the room when its spoken, when o Relative
lodged memories in limbic sys. Dreams you weren’t previously paying attention Clarity: hazy
start random then develop meaning • VISUAL SYSTEM: objects appear further away
• PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS: o Cornea – protects the eye o Texture Gradient: coarser objects=closer
o Triggers dopamine release in the brain o Pupil/iris – controls light entering eye o Relative Height: things higher in our
Pathway of light follows this direction 

o Depressants: Alcohol, barbiturates, o Lens – focuses light on retina field of vision look further away
tranquilizers, opiates (narcotics) o Retina – contains rods and cones o Motion Parallax: closer objects appear to
 Decrease sympathetic NS activation, o Fovea–area of best vision(cones here) move faster than objects that are farther
highly addictive o Rods – black/white, dim light • BINOCULAR CUES: (how both eyes
o Stimulants: Amphetamines, Cocaine, o Cones – color, bright light (red, green, blue) make up a 3D image)
MDMA (ecstasy), Caffeine, Nicotine o Bipolar cells – connect rods/cones
o and Retinal Disparity: Image is cast slightly
 Increase sympathetic NS activation, ganglion cells different on each retina, location of
highly addictive o Ganglion – create optic nerve image helps us determine depth
o Hallucinogens: LSD, Marijuana o Blind spot – occurs where theooptic Convergence: Eyes strain more (looking
 Causes hallucinations, less addictive nerve leaves the eye inward) as objects draw nearer
o Tolerance: Needing more of a drug to o Feature detectors – specialized cells • TOP-DOWN PROCESSING: Whole 
achieve the same effects that see shapes, lines, etc. located in smaller parts (painting w/ faces)
occipital lobe (experiments by Hubel & • BOTTOM-UP PROCESSING: Smaller
Weisel) Parts  Whole (dog of bunch of dots)
• AUDITORY SYSTEM:  Proximity: group things together that
All operant conditioning
o Pathway of sound: sound  pinna  appear near each other
auditory canal ear drum (tympanic  Similarity: group things together OPERANT CONDITIONING:
membrane)  hammer, anvil, stirrup based off of looks SKINNER!
(HAS)  oval window  cochlea   Continuity: tendency to mentally form O LAW OF EFFECT (Thorndike):
auditory nerve  temporal lobes a continuous line Behaviors followed by pos. outcomes
o Outer Ear: pinna (ear), auditory canal are strengthened, neg. outcomes weaken
o Middle Ear: ear drum, HAS (bones a behavior (cat in the puzzle box)

FRQ – make sure to indicate reinforcement


vibrate to send signal) • PRINCIPLES OF OPERANT COND:
o Inner Ear: cochlea – like COCHELLA O Pos. Reinforcement: Add something

results in a continued behavior


(sounds 1st processed here); basilar nice to increase a behavior (gold star for
membrane is IN the cochlea turning in HW)
O Neg. Reinforcement: Take away
something bad/annoying to increase a
behavior (put on seatbelt to take away
annoying car signal)
O Pos. Punishment: Add something bad
to decrease a behavior (spanking)
O Neg. Punishment: Take away
something good to decrease a behavior
(take away car keys)
Learning O Primary Reinforcers: innately
satisfying (food and water)
(7-9 %) O Secondary Reinforcers: everything else
• THEORIES OF HEARING: both occur
(stickers, high-fives)
in the cochlea All associated w/ classical conditioning
 Token Reinforcer: type of
o Place theory – location where hair cells
CLASSICAL CONDITIONING: PAVLOV! secondary- can be exchanged for other
bends determines sound (high pitches)
o Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS): causes stuff (game tokens or money)
o Frequency theory – rate at which action
response w/o needing to be learned (food) O Generalization: respond to similar
potentials are sent determines sound
o Unconditioned Response (UCR): response stimulus for reward
(low pitches)
that naturally occurs w/o training (salivate) O Discrimination: stimulus signals when
• COMMON ILLUSIONS: behavior will or will not be reinforced
o Neutral Response (NS): stimulus that
O Muller-lyer – doesn’t (light on means response are accepted)
normally doesn’t evoke a response (bell)
work on cultures w/o o Conditioned Stimulus (CS): once NS that O Extinction / Spontaneous Recovery:
exposure to modern now brings about a response (bell) same as classical conditioning
architecture O Overjustification Effect: reinforcing
o Conditioned Response (CR): response
O Ponzo – happens due to behaviors that are intrinsically
after conditioning, follows a CS (salivate)
linear perspective motivating causes you to stop doing
o Contiguity: Timing of the pairing, NS/CS
O McGurk effect – see mouth saying ba or them (give a child 5$ for reading when
must be presented .5-1 sec BEFORE the US
fa overrides what you actually hear (va) o Acquisition: process of learning the they already like to read – they stop
Common FRQ terms – don’t mix the terms

• OTHER SENSES: response pairing reading)


o Touch: Mechanoreceptors  spinal cord o Extinction: previously conditioned O Shaping: use successive approximations
 thalamus  somatosensory cortex response dies out over time to train behavior (reward desired
o Vestibular: Sense of balance o Spontaneous Recovery: After a period of behaviors to teach a response – rat
(semicircular canals in the inner ear time the CR comes back out of nowhere basketball)
effect this) o Generalization: CR to like stimuli (similar O Continuous Reinforcement schedule:
o Kinesthetic (proprioception): Sense of sounding bell) Receive reward for every response
body position (neurons in ligaments & o Discrimination: CR to ONLY the CS (only O Fixed Ratio schedule: Reward every X
body tell you this) drool to that one bell, no others) number of response (every 10 envelopes
o Pain (nociception): Gate-control theory: CONTINGENCY MODEL: Rescorla & stuffed get $$)
we have a “gate” to control how much Wagner – classical conditioning involves O Fixed Interval schedule: Reward every
pain is experienced cognitive processes X amount of time passed (every 2 weeks
o Taste (gustation): 5 taste receptors: CONDITIONED TASTE AVERSION get a paycheck)
bitter, salty, sweet, sour, umami (savory) (ONE-TRIAL LEARNING): John O Variable Ratio schedule: Rewarded
o Smell (olfaction): Only sense that does Garcia – Innate predispositions can allow after a random number of responses (slot
NOT route through the thalamus 1st. classical conditioning to occur in one trial machine
Goes to temporal lobe and amygdala (food poisoning) O Variable Interval schedule: Rewarded
• GESTALT PSYCHOLOGY: Whole is John Watson (father of behaviorism) and after a random amount of time has
greater than the sum of its parts Little Albert – conditioned a fear in a baby passed (fishing)
Gestalt Principles: – eventually leads to behavioral treatments O Variable schedules are most resistant to
 Figure/ground: organize information for fear (counterconditioning) extinction (how long will keep playing a
into figures objects (figures) that stand slot machine before you think its
apart from surrounds (back ground) broken?)
 Closure: mentally fill in gaps
SOCIAL (OBSERVATIONAL) STORAGE: Retaining info over time • Repressed memories: unconsciously
LEARNING: BANDURA! • Information Processing Model – buried memories – are unreliable
• Modeling Behaviors: Children model Sensory memory, short term memory, • Encoding failure: forget info b/c you
(imitate) behaviors. Study used BoBo long term memory model never encoded it (paid attention to it) in the
dolls to demonstrate the following • Sensory Memory – stores all incoming first place (which is the real penny)
O Prosocial – helping behaviors stimuli that you receive (first you have • Encoding specificity principle: the more
O Antisocial – mean behaviors to a pay attention) closely retrieval cues match the way we
• MISC LEARNING TYPES o Iconic Memory – visual memory, learned the info, the better we remember
O Latent learning (Tolman!) – learning is lasts 0.3 seconds the info (like state dependent memory)
hidden until useful (rats in maze get o Echoic Memory – auditory memory, • Forgetting curve: recall decreases rapidly
reinforced half way through, lasts 2-3 seconds at first, then reaches a plateau after which
performance improved • Short Term Memory – info passes little more is forgotten (EBBINGHAUS)
 Cognitive maps – mental from sensory memory to STM – lasts
representation of an area, allows 30 secs, and can remember 7 ± 2 items
navigation if blocked o Rehearsal (repeating the info) resets
O Insight learning (Kohler!) – some the clock
learning is through simple intuition • Working Memory Model splits STM
(chimps with crates to get bananas) into 2 – visual spatial memory (from
O Learned Helplessness – no matter what iconic mem) and phonological loop
you do you never get a positive outcome (from echoic mem). A “central
so you just give up (word scrambles) executive” puts it together before
passing it to LTM • Proactive interference
Cognition • Long term memory – lasts a life time OLD info blocks new info
o Explicit (Declarative):
(13 – 17%)  Episodic: events
• Retroactive interference
ENCODING: Getting info into memory  Semantic: facts NEW info blocks old info
• Automatic encoding – requires no effort o Implicit (Nondeclarative): • Misinformation effect: distortion of
(what did you have for breakfast?)  Classical conditioning memory by suggestion or misinformation
• Effortful encoding – requires attention  Priming: info that is seen earlier (Loftus – lost in the mall, Disney land)
(school work) “primes” you to remember • Framing – the way a question is framed
• Shallow, intermediate, deep processing: something later on impacts how info is recalled / perceived
the more emphasis on MEANING the  Procedural: skills (muscle (how fast were the cars going when they
deeper the processing, and the better memory)** needs to CLEARLY be smashed)
remembered an example w/o conscious thought • Anterograde amnesia: amnesia moves
• Imagery – attaching images to information on FRQ forward (forget new info – 50 first dates)
makes it easier to remember (shoe w/ • Memory organization • Retrograde amnesia: amnesia moves
spaghetti laces) o Hierarchies: memory is stored backwards (forget old info)
• Self-referent encoding – we better according to a hierarchy • Source Amnesia: forget who told you,
remember what we’re interested in (you’d o Semantic networks: linked where you heard it
remember someone’s phone number who memories are stored together • ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE: caused by
you found extremely attractive) o Schemas: preexisting mental concept destruction of acetylcholine in
• Dual encoding – using multiple methods of how something should look (like a hippocampus
of processing to remember (photo + words) restaurant) LANGUAGE
• Chunking – break info into smaller units • Memory storage • Phonemes: smallest unit of sound (ch
to aid in memory (like a phone #) o Acetylcholine neurons in the sound in chat)
• Mnemonics – shortcuts to help us hippocampus for most memories • Morpheme: smallest unit that caries
remember info easier o Cerebellum for procedural meaning (-ed means past tense)
o Acronyms – using letter to remember memories • Grammar: rules in a language that enable
something (PEMDAS) o Long-term potentiation: neural basis of us to communicate
o Method of loci – using locations to memory – connections are strengthened • Semantics: set of rules by which we
remember a list of items in order over time with repeated stimulation (more derive meaning (adding –ed makes
o Peg-word – using a rhyme w/ firing of neurons) something past tense)
imagery to remember lists in order RETRIEVAL: Taking info out of storage • Syntax: rules for combining words into
• Context dependent memory – where • Serial Position Effect: tendency to sentences (white house vs casa blanca)
you learn the info you best remember remember the beginning (primacy effect) • Surface structures: actual written/ spoken
the info (scuba divers testing) and the end (recency effect) of the list best message
• State dependent memory – the • Recall: remember what you’ve been told • Deep structures: intended meaning (I
physical state you were in when w/o cues (essays) never said she stole my money – has 7
learning is the way you should be when • Recognition: remember what you’ve been different interpretations)
testing (study high, test high) told w/ cues (MC) • Babbling stage: 1st stage of speech
• Depth of Processing – the deeper • Flashbulb memories: particularly vivid • One-word stage: duh (holophrastic)
(more effort, thought) you think about memories for highly important events
• Two-word stage: duh duh (telegraphic
something the more you remember (9/11 attacks)
speech)
• Theories of language development: • Divergent thinking: ability to think • Types of Tests:
o Behavioral Theory (SKINNER): about many different things at once o Aptitude: predicts your abilities to learn
learn language through pos. (Creative) a new skill (ASVAB)
reinforcement • Convergent thinking: limits creativity – o Achievement: tests what you know(SAT)
 Imitation: Kids repeat what they hear one answer • TEST CREATION:
o Nativistic theory (lang. acquisition INDIVIDUAL THEORIES ABOUT o Standardization: administer a test to a
device): NOAM CHOMSKY – INTELLIGENCE representative sample of future test takers
language is innate / biological; we are • GALTON: 1st to suggest intelligence was to establish a basis for meaningful
predisposed to learn inherited. Supported eugenics. comparison (test it out 1st)
 Overregularization: grammar • CATTELL: 2 clusters of mental abilities o Should be reliable: same results over
mistake- children over use certain o Crystalized intelligence: language skills time
morphemes (I go-ed to the park) and facts - what you learn in school –hard  Split-half reliability: compare two
o Critical period: period of time where (like crystals!) facts, increase w/ age halves of the test
something must be learned or else it o Fluid intelligence: spatial abilities,  Test-retest reliability: use the same
cannot ever happen (language must be processing speed, abstract thinking – test on 2 different occasions
learned young – Genie the Wild Child) can’t learn in school. decrease w/ age o Should be valid: test is accurate –
o Linguistic determinism: language • SPEARMAN’S G FACTOR: said a measures what it is intended to
influences the way we think (Hopi have general intelligence (g) underlies all mental  Content validity: test measures what
no words for past, do not think about abilities (typical IQ of today) you want it to (an IQ test actually
the past) developed by WHORF • GARDNER: multiple intelligences (8): measures IQ)
THINKING linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical,  Predictive validity: test is able to
• Metacognition: thinking about (reflecting spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, intrapersonal accurately predict a trait (high math
upon) the way you think (self), interpersonal (others), naturalist scores predicts good engineer)
• Concepts: mental categories used to group • STERNBERG: TRIARCHIC THEORY • Standardized tests establish a normal
objects, events, characteristics o Analytical: mental components to solve distribution
• Prototypes: all instances of a concept are problems, what IQ tests assess (book • Standard dev are used to compare scores.
compared to an ideal example (what you smarts) Standard deviation measures how much the
first think of) o Practical: ability to size up new scores vary from the mean. The percentages
• Algorithms: step by step strategies that situations and adapt to real-life demands stay the same in every curve
guarantee a solution (formula) (street smarts)
• Heuristics: short cut strategy (rule of o Creative: intellectual and motivational
thumb) processes that lead to novel solutions,
o Representative Heuristic: make idea, products
judgment based on your experience (like • BINET: developed 1st intelligence test,
a stereotype) – assume someone must be combined with TERMAN – developed the
a librarian b/c they’re quiet STANFORD-BINET IQ TEST
o Availability heuristic: make a
judgement based on the first thing that
pops in your head (assume planes are
dangerous b/c crash in the news) o Chronological age = actual age
• Mental Set - keep using one strategy to o Mental age = tested age compared to Development
solve a problem – cannot think outside the other of that age
box o 100 is average, SD = 15 (7-9%)
• Functional Fixedness: can only see one • WECHSLER: developed the WAIS and • Prenatal Development:
(common) use for an item– cannot think WISC – most commonly used today o Zygote: 0 – 14 days, cells are dividing
outside of the box • FLYNN effect: IQ has steadily risen over o Embryo: until about 9 weeks, vital
• Belief bias: tendency of one’s preexisting the past 80 years – probably due to organs being formed
beliefs to distort logical reasoning by education standards and better IQ tests o Fetus: 9 wks to birth
making invalid conclusions • Extremes of Intelligence: high IQ = above o Teratogens: external agents that can
• Belief perseverance: cling to our beliefs 135; intellectually disadvantage = below 70 cause abnormal prenatal development
in the face on contrary evidence • Causes of mild intellectual disadvantage: (alcohol, drugs, etc)
• Confirmation bias: look for evidence to o PKU – liver fails to produce an enzyme  Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS): large
support what we already believe needed to breakdown chemicals amount of alcohol leads to FAS, causes
o Down syndrome – extra copy of 21st deformities, mental disability, death
3 Part FRQ Answers: B.P. – belief,
chromosome • Physical Development:
contrary evidence, belief stays. C.B. – o Maturation: natural course of
o Fragile X – higher chance in boys due to
belief, seek supporting evidence, belief development, occurs no matter what
stays
ONE X chromosome
• Influence on IQ: (walking)
o Genetics: MZ twins have similar IQ, o Reflexes: innate responses we’re born w/
• Inductive reasoning: data drives  Rooting, sucking, swallowing,
decisions,(inductive ends with an idea adopted kids more similar to biological
parents grasping, Moro (startle), stepping,
(I/I) Babinski (toes spread when foot
o Environment: early neglect leads to
• Deductive reasoning: driven by logic, touched)
lower IQ, good schooling to higher IQ
deductive ends w/ data (d/d)
o Eyes have the most limited • BAUMRIND: parenting styles • PUBERTY! (rapid skeletal and sexual
development, takes till 1 year o Authoritarian: rules & obedience, “my maturation)
 Visual cliff: babies have to learn depth way or the highway” – kids lack o Primary sex characteristics: necessary
perception, so they will cross a “cliff” initiative in college structures for reproduction (ovaries,
o Other senses are fairly developed o Permissive: kids do whatever – no rules testicles, vagina, penis)
• JEAN PIAGET’S COGNITIVE DEV. – kids lack initiative in college o Secondary sex characteristics:
• Schemas – concepts or frameworks that o Authoritative: give and take w/ kids – nonreproductive characteristics that dev
organize info kids become socially competent and during puberty (breasts, hips, deepening
• Assimilation: incorporate new info into reliable – best type of voice, body hair)
existing schema (aSSimlation – same stuff). • MARY AINSWORTH: developed the o Frontal lobe continuous dev (not fully
Cat is a dog b/c 4 legs. strange situation paradigm (children left developed till 25)
• Accommodation: adjust existing schemas alone in a room w/ a stranger, then reunited • GENDER DEVELOPMENT: sex =
to incorporate new information w/ mom – determines your attachment style chromosomes, gender = what you identify
(ACcommodation - All Change). Cat and o Secure attachment (60% of infants): yourself as
dogs = different. upset when mom leaves, easily calmed o Gender roles: expected behaviors
• Sensorimotor Stage: Birth to 2 years: on return. Tend to be more stable adults (norms) for men/women
focused on exploring the world around o Avoidant attachment (20% infants): o Social learning theory: we learn gender
them actively avoids mom, doesn’t care when roles and identity from those around us
o Lack Object Permanence: Objects when she leaves • AGING:
removed from field of view are thought to o Ambivalent attachment(10% infants): o Cellular clock theory: cells have a
disappear (peek-a-boo) actively avoids mom, freaks out when maximum # of divisions before they
o Dev. Sense of Self: by 2 yrs can she leaves can’t divide anymore
recognize themselves in the mirror (blush o Disorganized attachment (5%): o Free-radical theory: unstable oxygen
test) confused, fearful, dazed – result of abuse molecules w/in cells damage DNA
• Pre-operational Stage: 2 – 7 years: use • KOHLBERG’S MORAL DEV o Over time skills decrease (reaction
pretend play, developing language, using o Preconventional morality: Children: time, memory)
intuitive reasoning they follow rules to avoid punishment • CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY: studies
o Lack Conservation: recognize that o Conventional morality: adolescents: ppl of different ages at the same point in
substances remain the same despite follow rules b/c it’s the law, or to gain time
changes in shape, length, or position (girls social approval o Adv: inexpensive & quick
with juice in glasses) o Postconventional morality: adults: they o Disadv: can be differences due to
o Lack Reversibility: cannot do reverse do what they believe is right (even if it generational gap
operations (count out both 4+2 and 2+4) goes against society) • LONGITUDINAL STUDY: studies same
o Are egocentric: inability to distinguish • Carol Gilligan: said moral reasoning and ppl over time
one’s own perspective from another’s – moral behaviors are two different things o Adv: eliminates groups (cohort)
think everyone sees what they see (what you say isn’t always what you do) differences, lots of detail
• Concrete Operational Stage: 7-11 yrs: use • Also said mean use “justice” for postcon. o Disadv: expensive, time consuming, high
operational thinking, classification, and women use “caring for others” drop out rates
can think logical in concrete context • ERIKSON’S SOCIOEMOTINAL DEV. :
• Formal Operational Stage: 11-15 yrs: use each stage represents a crisis that must be Motivation, Emotion, and
abstract and idealist thoughts, resolved, results in competence or weakness
hypothetical-deductive reasoning o Trust vs Mistrust (birth – 18 months): if Personality
• Problems with Piaget’s theory: stages too needs are met infants dev basic trust (11-15%)
discrete, dev. differs b/w kids o Autonomy vs shame&doubt (1 -3 yrs):
THEORIES OF MOTIVATION
• VYGOTSKY’S THEORY: cognitive learn to exercise their will (I WANT TO
• INSTINCT: complex behaviors have fixed
development is a social process too, need to DO IT – pours milk)
patterns and are not learned (explains
interact w/ others o Initiative vs guilt (3-6 yrs): learn to
animal motivation)
o Zone of Proximal Development: gap initiate tasks and carry out plans (WHY
kid) • DRIVE REDUCTION: physiological need
b/w what a child can do on their own and creates aroused tension (drive) that
w/ support. Need scaffolding (teachers) o Industry vs inferiority (6 yrs to
puberty): learn what you’re good or motivates you to satisfy the need (driven by
SOCIOEMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT homeostasis: equilibrium). “I’m hungry, I
• Temperament: patterns of emotional accomplished at (school / sports success)
o Identity vs role confusion: (adolescence seek out food to decrease my hunger”
reactions and babies (precursor to o Primary drive: unlearned drive based
personality) thru 20s): refine a sense of self by testing
roles and forming an identity on survival (hunger, thirst)
• Imprinting: baby geese believe the first o Secondary drive: learned drive
thing they see after hatching is their mom – o Intimacy vs isolation: (20s—40s): form
close relationships and gain capacity for (wealth or success)
happens during a critical period (from • INCENTIVE THEORY: driven by
LORENZ) love
o Generativity vs stagnation: (40s-60s): external rewards
• HARRY HARLOW: discovered that o Intrinsic motivation: inner motivation
discover sense of contributing to the
contact comfort is more important than – you do it b/c you like it
world, thru family & work
FRQ Favs

feeding (monkeys fed on wire or cloth o Extrinsic motivation: motivation to


o Integrity vs despair: (60s and up):
mothers). Monkeys raised in isolation obtain a reward (trophy)
reflect on your life, feel satisfaction or
couldn’t socialize
failure
• COGNITIVE DISSONANCE: Eating Disorders: INDUSTRIAL/ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCH
(FESTINGER): two opposing thoughts o Anorexia: weight loss of at least 15% • Industrial / Organizational Psych:
conflict w/ each other, causing discomfort ideal weight, distorted body image psychof the work – employee recruitment,
(dissonance), which makes us find ways to  Causes: overly critical parents, training, satisfaction, productivity
justify the situation (cult that was going to perfectionist tendencies, societal ideals • Ergonomics / Human Factors: intersection
be abducted by aliens, smokers) o Bulimia: usually normal body weight, go of engineering and psych – focuses on
• OPTIMUM AROUSAL (ALSO through a binge-purge eating pattern (eat safety and efficiency of human-machine
CALLED THE YERKES DODSON massive amounts, then throw up) interactions
LAW): humans seek optimum levels of  Causes: same as anorexia • Hawthorne effect: productivity increases
arousal –easier tasks requires more arousal, o Binge Eating: engage in binge patterns when workers are made to feel important
harder tasks need less only, no purge (teacher teaches when principal comes in)
SEXUALITY • Theory X management: manager controls
• Biology of sex: employees, enforces rules. Good for lower
o Hypothalamus: stimulation increases level jobs
sexual behavior, destruction leads to • Theory Y management: manger gives
sexual inhibition employees responsibility, looks for input.
 Males – testosterone Good for high level jobs
 Females - estrogen STRESS AND HEALTH
o Sexual Response Pattern: Excitement • Problem-focused coping: solving or doing
phase, plateau, orgasm, refractory period something to alter the course of stress
(resolution phase) (cannot “fire” again (planning, acceptance)
until you reset, guys only) • Emotion-focused coping: reducing the
o Alfred Kinsey: created Kinsey scale of emotional distress (denial, disengagement)
homosexuality (ranges on a spectrum)
• GENERAL ADAPTATION
Studies lacked a representative sample SYNDROME (GAS): three phases of a
o Homosexuality: biological roots:
stress response (SELYE came up w/ this)
differences in the brain, identical twins
• HIERARCHY OF NEEDS: theory derived more likely to both be gay, later sons
by MASLOW – needs lower in the pyramid more likely to be (hormones from mom)
have priority over needs higher in the THORIES OF EMOTIONS
pyramid Older Theories
• James Lange – Stimulus  Arousal (SNS)
 Emotion
• Canon Bard – Stimulus  Arousal /
Emotion simultaneous
New Theories o GAS on the FRQ – MUST
• Schacter Two Factor – Stimulus REFERENCE A PHYSIO REPSONSE
arousal  label / emotion simultaneous o Alarm: SNS ˄ immune system ˅
• Lazarus Appraisal – Stimulus  Label o Resistance: SNS ˄ immune system ˄
HUNGER Arousal / Emotion (LL – Lazarus Labels o Exhaustion: SNS ˄ immune system ˅
• Signals of hunger: First) • Type A Personality: rigid, stressful person,
Not valid today

o Stomach contractions tell us we’re hungry Biological Theory (Le Doux) perfectionist. At risk for heart disease
o Glucose (sugar) level is maintained by • Some • Type B Personality: laid back, nonstressed.
the pancreas (endocrine system). stimuli are Theories of Conflict (Lewin)
o Insulin decreases glucose. Too little routed • Approach approach conflict: win – win
glucose makes us hungry. directly to situation; conflict is which win you have
o Hormones signal eat: Ghrelin,orexin the to choose (you can eat out at ONE of your
(GO eat) amygdala two favorite restaurants – you can only
o Hormones signal stop: PYY, leptin bypassing choose one though)
o Lateral hypothalamus: stimulated the frontal cortex (gut reaction to a • Approach avoidance conflict: win – lose
makes you hungry; lesioned you will cockroach) situation; outcome has positive and
never eat again. (I’m LATE for lunch. • Behavioral factors: there are SIX universal negative aspects (marriage)
I’m hungry. The LATEral emotions (happiness, anger, sadness, • Avoidance avoidance conflict : lose –
hypothalamus makes you hungry.) surprise, disgust, feat) seen across ALL lose; both outcomes are bad but you have
• Ventromedial hypothalamus: stimulated cultures (Eckman’s theory) to choose one (clean your room or do
you feel full, destroyed you eat eat eat eat • Non-verbal cues: gestures, duchenne smile your homework)
• Obesity: (you can tell a real smile from a fake one) • Multiple approach avoidance conflict:
o Can be genetic – adopted children • Facial feedback hypothesis: being forced two (or more) win-lose situations; conflict
resemble their biological parents to smile will make you happier (cartoon is which to choose (College A is good for
o Set point: control system dictates how study with pen in mouth) your major but no scholarship, College B
much fat you should carry – every person • Display Rules: social group or culture’s is bad for your major but has a
is different norms of how to express certain emotions scholarship)
PERSONALITY THEORIES
PSYCHODYNAMIC EXPLANATION What’s wrong w/ Freud theory? – What’s wrong w/ these tests?
SIGMUND FREUD said personality was unverifiable, descriptive not predictive • They’re long, social desirability can be an
largely unconscious. What’s good about it? – 1st theory about influence, and they’re too broad
• Conscious: current awareness personality, sparked psychoanalysis HUMANISTIC PERSPECTIVE
• Preconscious: available to awareness How do we test this approach? • Emphasized personal growth and free will.
(phone #s) • Psychoanalysis: analyze a person’s You don’t like yourself? So change!
• Unconscious: unavailable to awareness unconscious motives thru the use of: • CARL ROGERS: talked about our self-
• id: our hidden true animalistic wants and o Free Association: say aloud everything concept (idea of who we are). Your self-
desires – operates on the pleasure principle, that comes to mind w/o hesitation concept is the center of your personality
all about rewards and avoiding pain (devil o Transference: looks for feelings to o Actual (social) self: what others see
on your shoulder – entirely unconscious) transferred to psychoanalyst o Ideal (true) self: who you WANT to be
• superego: our moral conscious (angel on o Dream interpretation: analyze the What wrong with humanistic theory? -
your shoulder, all 3 consciousness) manifest (seen message) and latent too optimistic about human nature, abstract
• ego: reality principle, has to deal w/ society, (hidden messages) content concepts are difficult to test
stuck mediating b/w the id and superego (its o Projective Tests: ambiguous stimuli What’s good about it? – emphasizes
you! – conscious and preconscious) shown to look at your unconscious conscious experiences and change
When ego cannot mediate b/w the id and motives (THESE SUCK B/C THEY • Individualistic Cultures: give priorities to
superego, we use defense mechanisms ARE VERY SUBJECTIVE) own goals over group goals. Define your
• Repression: push memories back into the  Thematic apperception test (TAT) : identify in terms of you (American society)
unconscious mind (sexual abuse is too tell a story about a picture (when • Collectivistic Cultures: give priority to the
traumatic to deal w/ so you repress it) someone has a tattoo (tatt) you ask goals of the group, your identity is part of
what it means that group (China)
• Projection: attribute personal shortcomings
 Rorschach inkblot: show an inkblot SOCIAL-COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE
& faults on to others (man who wants to
NEO-FREUDIANS • Behavior is a complex interaction of inner
have an affair accuses his wife of one)
• Denial: refuse to acknowledge reality • CARL JUNG: believed in the collective process and environmental influence –
unconscious (shared inherited reservoir of which influences personality
(refuse to believe you have cancer)
memory – explains common myths across • Emphasizes conscious awareness, beliefs,
• Displacement; take feelings out on
civilizations & time) expectations, and goals
something else (can’t tell at teacher, go
• KAREN HORNEY: said personality • BANDURA! Talked about RECIPROCAL
home and yell at the dog)
develops in context of social relationships, DETERMINISM: interaction of behavior,
• Reaction formation: transform
NOT sexual urges (security not sex is cognitions, and environment make up you.
unacceptable motive into his opposite
motivation, men get womb envy) {I’m outgoing
(insecure about masculinity becomes extra)
• ALFRED ADLER: coined “inferiority (behavior), I
• Regression: go into an earlier development
complex” also argued a social nature choose to teach b/c
period in the face of stress (during exam
TRAIT PERSPECTIVE it lets me be
week you start to suck your thumb)
• Traits: enduring personality characteristics, outgoing
• Rationalization: replace a less acceptable
people can be described by these – have (environment), and
reasoning with a more acceptable one (don’t
strong or weak tendencies. They are stable, I have thought this
get into your college – justify it was a crap
genetic, and predict other attributes. through which is why I teach despite making
college anyway)
• Use factor analysis: statistical procedure less money (cognitive)}
• Sublimation: replace unacceptable impulse
used to identify similar components • Self-efficacy: belief that one can succeed,
w/ a socially acceptable one (person who
likes fighting becomes professional • TRAIT THEORIES: so you ensure you do through actions
kickboxer) • Big Five: (by Costa & McCrae) (acronym *****FRQ FAVORITE
FREUD’S PSYCHOSEXUAL STAGES OCEAN) You vary on each of these • Internal locus of control: you control your
FRQ Favs

o Openness : high levels = imaginative, own fate


• Oral stage (0-18 months): born entirely id
independent, like variety
• Anal stage (18 – 36 months): ego forms • External locus of control: chance / outside
o Conscientiousness: high levels =
• Phallic stage (3 – 6 yrs): superego forms forces control your fate
organized, careful, disciplined
o Oedipal complex: young boys learn to What’s wrong with social-cognitive? – Too
o Extraversion: high levels = sociable, fun-
identify w/ their father out of fear of specific, cannot generalize
loving, affectionate (opposite is
retribution (castration anxiety) What’s good about it? – Highlights
introversion: shy, timid, reserved)
o Electra complex: young girls learn to situations, and cog. explanations
o Agreeableness: high levels = soft
identify w/ their mother b/c they cannot How do we test it? – Observations &
hearted, trusting, helpful
with their father (penis envy) interviews (time consuming)
o Neuroticism (emotional stability): high
• Latency stage (6 yrs to puberty): levels = emotions, easy to stress
personality is set What’s wrong with trait theory? – ignores
• Genital State (adulthood): sexual the role of the situation in behavior
reawakening – oedipal and electra What’s good about it? - identifying traits
“feelings” are repressed, turn sexual wants gives us perspectives about careers,
onto an appropriate person relationships, health
• FIXATION: can become “stuck” in an How do we test this approach?
earlier stage – influences personality (oral • Personality Inventories like:
stage smokes/drinks, anal is “anal o MMPI –for mental health and jobs
retentive”, phallic is promiscuous)
DISSOCIATIVE DISORDERS CAUSES OF DEPRESSIVE AND
Clinical Psychology • Dissociative Identity Disorder: formerly BIPOLAR DISORDERS
(12 – 16%) multiple personalities – person fractures • Biology: lower levels of serotonin &
• Defining abnormal behavior: into several distinct personalities who norepinephrine linked to depression, higher
o Requires “clinically significant” normally have no awareness of each other. levels of norepinephrine linked to mania.
disturbance in cognition, emotional NOT SCHIZOPHRENIA! Runs in families suggesting GENES. Twin
regulation or behavior AND o Usually caused by childhood abuse studies also support this.
o Significant distress or disability social • Dissociative Amnesia + Fugue: following • Cognitive: negative thought patterns leads
situations, occupations or other important a traumatic event a person leaves, taking on to depression
activities a whole new life & personality w/ no PERSONALITY DISORDERS
• Historical causes: biology, psychological memory of the previous one • Marked by disruptive, inflexible, enduring
issues, supernatural issues (demons) SCHIZOPHRENIA behavior patterns – makes this very
• Medical model: emphasizes treatment of NOT MULTIPLE PERSONALITIES! difficult to treat!
disorders, as they have a biological origin. THEY HAVE ONE PERSONALITY! o Antisocial: NOT “avoidant of
• Biopsychosocial model: currently used • SYMPTOMS socialization” – more like “anti-society” –
model – stress biological, psychological, o Positive Symptoms (not good – means disregard for others, manipulative, breaks
and social causes something added)) laws
• Diagnosing abnormal behavior:  Hallucinations: sensory experiences o Borderline: instable interpersonal
o DSM: manual listing all currently w/o sensory stimulation (seeing and/or relationships & self-image
accepted psychological disorders. hearing things) o Histrionic: excessive emotionality &
Classifies them based on criteria –  Delusions: fixed, false beliefs (people attention seeking
provides no explanation of causes or are out to get them, grandiose thoughts o Narcissistic: need for admiration & lack
treatments (I am God) of empathy
• Dorothea Dix – reform movement –  Disorganized thinking, Disorganized OTHER DISORDERS
helped reform psychiatric care in early speech • Obsessive-compulsive Disorders
America o Negative Symptoms (something taken (OCD): person is overwhelmed with
• Rosenhan study – indvs. Purposefully away) both:
got admitted to institutions, caused  Flat affect: lack ability to show o Obsessions: persistent unwanted
reform in institutions again emotions thoughts (did I leave the stove on?)
ANXIETY DISORDERS  Impaired decision making, inability o Compulsions: senseless rituals (hand
Most common disorders in the U.S. to pay attention washing)
• Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): o Catatonia: become frozen over periods • Post-traumatic stress disorders
person is generally anxious, all the time, for of time (exhibit waxy flexibility: can (PTSD): flashbacks, problems w/
NO REASON move them into new positions) concentration, and anxiety following a
• Panic Disorder: person is prone to frequent • CAUSES OF SCHIZOPHRENIA traumatic event (war, natural disasters)
panic attacks (feeling like you’re having a o Brain abnormalities: enlarged ventricles • Autism Spectrum Disorder: usually
(atrophy), smaller frontal cortex diagnosed in childhood, characterized by
heart attack). Can come w/ agoraphobia:
o Genetics: runs in families, MZ twins at an impairment in social relationships,
anxiety about being in places you cannot
escape (fear of public spaces / people) higher risk communication, and activities
o Dopamine hypothesis: too much TREATMENT OF DISORDERS
• Phobias: irrational fear that disrupts your
dopamine in the brain • PSYCHODYNAMIC APPROACH: SEE
life
o Diathesis – Stress: individual has a PERSONALITY SECTION
CAUSES OF ANXIETY DISORDERS:
genetic predisposition, disease must be • HUMANISTIC APPROACH:
• Psychodynamic: repressed thoughts &
feelings manifest in anxiety and rituals “turned-on” by environmental stimuli o Client-centered therapy: (developed by
• Behaviorist: fear conditioning leads to (like stress) –most commonly developed CARL ROGERS) techniques include
anxiety, which is then reinforced. Phobias during college years active listening, accepting environment,
might be learned through observational DEPRESSIVE DISORDERS focuses on patient growth (you figure
learning • Major depressive disorder: extreme out what needs to change and do it)
Biological: natural selection favored those with sadness and despair, apathy towards life • COGNITIVE APPROACH:
certain phobias (heights). Twins often share • Disruptive mood regulation disorder:
disorders. Often see less GABA in the brain
o Rational-emotive therapy: (developed
Frequent temper tantrums inconsistent with by ELLIS) techniques include analyzing
SOMATOFORM DISORDERS developmental level self-defeating behaviors to change
• Psych disorders w/ no physical cause • Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD): form thought patterns – and then change
o Conversion disorder: loss of feeling or of depression that occurs typically winter – behaviors associated w/ said patterns
usage of a limb or body part (sight) – found mostly in Northern areas (Alaska,  Best for anxiety disorders
absolutely no physiological cause though Ireland) UNIQUE TREATMENT =  Very confrontational
o Illness Anxiety Disorder: person LIGHT THERAPY o Cognitive therapy: (developed by
obsesses over the possibility of having BIPOLAR DISORDERS BECK) illogical thoughts 
an illness (no physical symptoms)
• Bipolar disorder: bouts of severe psychological problems, challenges
o Somatic Symptom Disorder: person
depression & manic episodes those thoughts
interprets normal symptoms as a major
o Mania: heightened mood, characterized  Best for depression
disease
by risky behaviors, fast talking, flights of  Self-directed – you figure out your
ideas errors
• BEHAVIORAL APPROACH (typically o Psychosurgery (frontal lobotomy): • Obedience: classic experiment done by
used for anxiety disorders / phobias) frontal lobe is surgically destroyed. Used MILGRAM: participants were to “teach”
o Classical Conditioning: to treat depression or violent individuals – another individual using shocks. 60% of
 Counterconditioning Little Albert & almost never used anymore participants would administer lethal shocks
Watson Social to another person simply b/c they were told
• Aversive conditioning: associate an GROUP INFLUENCE
unpleasant experience (e.g. nausea) (8-10%) • Social facilitation: perform better on
w/ an unwanted behavior (e.g. SOCIAL COGNITION simple or well learned tasks in the presence
drinking alcohol) • Attribution theory: we explain others of others
 Exposure therapy: slowly expose behaviors by crediting the situation or the • Social inhibition: perform worse on
people to whatever it is that makes person’s internal disposition (personality) difficult or unpracticed tasks in front of
them anxious • Actor-observer bias: when its others
• Systematic desensitization: others – blame the person, when its you, • Social loafing: tendency for ppl in a group
associate a pleasant relaxed state w/ blame the situation to exert less effort when pooling their effort
gradually increasing anxiety • Fundamental attribution error together (tug of war)
triggering stimuli (create a Tendency for observers to blame a • Deindividuation: loss of self-awareness
desensitization hierarchy – ex. List of person’s disposition (personality) and not and self-restraint occurring in group
things about flying that makes you consider the situation (that guy cut me off situations that foster arousal and anonymity
nervous – step through each one till b/c he’s a jerk – not that his wife could be (mob mentality)
you can do it) in labor) • Group polarization: the more time spent
• Intensive exposure therapy • Central route to persuasion: change w/ a group the stronger their thoughts /
(Flooding): force someone to people’s attitudes through logical opinions will become
experience the fear (afraid of arguments and explanations. Leads to • Groupthink: desire for harmony w/in a
drowning, throw you in a pool) long term behavior change group leads to everyone going along w/ the
o Operant Conditioning: use behavior • Peripheral route to persuasion: change same thinking, ignoring other possibilities
modification (reward good behaviors w/ people’s attitudes through incidental cues or bad ideas
token reinforcers ). Used in schools, w/ (like a speaker’s attractiveness). Leads to • Risky shift: groups make riskier decisions
autistic children, etc. temporary behavior changes together rather than alone
• OTHER THERPAIES: • Foot in the door phenomenon: PREJUDICE
o Family therapy: treats the family as a complying w/ a small request then leads • Ingroup: “US” – ppl w/ whom we share a
system, individual behaviors are to going along w/ a larger request (can I common identity
influenced by family dynamics have $5? Yes. Now can I have $25?) • Outgroup: “them” – ppl perceived as
o Group therapy: therapy through a group • Door in the face phenomenon: a large different or not part of the group
– lets patients see “they’re not alone” request is turned down, when then leads • Ingroup bias: tendency to favor our own
• BIOLOGICAL APPROACH: CALLED you to be more likely to comply w/ a group
BIOMEDICAL THERAPIES small request (can I have $100? Heck no! • Outgroup homogeneity bias: we are
o Drug therapies (psychopharmacology): How about $20? Okay) different, they are alike
 Anti-psychotics: decrease dopamine: • Halo effect: if your 1st impression • Scapegoat theory: prejudice offers an
treats schizophrenia someone is good you’ll interpret other outlet for anger by providing someone else
• Side effects: TARDIVE DYSKINESIA: info about them in a good way to blame
hand tremors (similar to Parkinson’s- • STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT • Ethnocentrism: tendency to see your own
due to lack of dopamine), worsening (ZIMBARDO): classic “experiment” group as more important than others
of negative symptoms, extreme where individuals were assigned to be • Just-world phenomenon: tendency for ppl
sedation guards / prisoners. w/in days they took on to believe that the world is just and
• Drug names: thorazine, clozapine their roles and went too far. Highly therefore ppl get what they deserve
 Mood stabilizers: used in the treatment unethical (homeless ppl)
of BIPOLAR disorder : LITHIUM SOCIAL INFLUENCE AGGRESION
 Anti-anxiety drugs: depress the • Conformity: classic experiment done by • Social learning theory (BANDURA) –
central nervous system (dangerous in ASCH – showed lines of different lengths, observing violence in others makes us
combo w/ alcohol) Xanax, Ativan confederates gave wrong answers to see if more violent for a time
 Anti-depressants: increase serotonin others would go • Frustration-aggression hypothesis:
through REUPTAKE inhibition along w/ it frustration creates anger, which leads to
• Side effects: drowsiness, anxiety, can o Normative aggression
increase suicide risk in teens social • Hostile aggression: emotional /
• Drug names: SSRIs (selective influence: we impulsive anger (setting car on fire)
serotonin reuptake inhibitors) like conform to
• Instrumental aggression: premediated –
Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil. SNRIs (selective gain approval or to not stand out from
goal is to get something (give me your
norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors) the group (be part of the norm)
lunch money)
Cymbalta, Effexor o Informational social influence: we
ATTRACTION
o Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): send conform to others b/c we think their
electricity to induce minor seizures. Used • Mere exposure effect: repeated exposure
opinions must be right (change answers
(rarely) to treat depression (when nothing to novel stimuli increases liking of them
to math hw)
else works). Thought to “reboot” the brain (the more time you spend around
something the more you like it)
• Physical attractiveness: pretty ppl are
thought to be more credible, less likely to
do bad things AP Exam Formatting: THOMPSON’s FRQ Tips:
• Similarity: we prefer ppl similar to us
• Passionate Love: Early stage of romance 100 Multiple Choice Questions – 70 1. Handwriting – FRQs are scanned in.
– intense pos. obsession w/ another (due minutes Its IMPERATIVE that you write in
to arousal) pen and write legibly. Skip lines
• Companionate Love: Later stage – deep 10 minute break between each line if you have bad
attachment to someone who your life is handwriting to make it easier.
intertwined w/ - best with equality and TWO FRQs – 50 Minutes 2. If you accidently indicate you’re
self-disclosure (revealing intimate details answering question one instead of
about self) • One FRQ specific to research question two or vice versa, label at
ALTRUISM methods the top of the page which question
• Altruism: unselfish regard for the • One FRQ conceptually based you’re answering, and how many
welfare of others pages you took (page 1 of 2, etc).
• Bystander effect: the more ppl around 3. Answer BOTH questions. It’s not a
the less likely we are to help someone in choice.
need (Kitty Genovese) FRQ TIPS: 4. Answer what you know on EACH
• Social exchange theory: social behavior FRQ first. (you have MORE than
(helping) is an exchange process – aim is Remember SODA CANS. enough room to space out your
to maximize benefits and minimize cost terms and keep them in order)
5. Then answer what you think you
• Reciprocity norm: we give so we can get Spacing – leave a space between each know
CONFLICT term that you are writing 6. Check your time – if you have <5
• Social trap: conflicting parties pursue about. The directions tell you minutes reread what you’ve wrote
their own best interests, which can result
not to. Do it anyway. and fix anything – if you have >10
in destructive results (prisoner’s dilemma
minutes –BS the terms you didn’t
– game theory) (choose 5 or 15 demo)
• Superordinate goals: two or more Order– write in order know at all, then reread and fix what
you wrote on the ones you did
groups work together to achieve a
Define – DEFINE EVERY TERM.** 7. Finally, DEFINE DEFINE
common goal, creates cohesiveness
DEFINE.
SOCIAL SELF
• False-consensus effect: we overestimate **w/ the exception of IV /
the degree to which everyone else thinks / DV; experimental group and THOMPSON’s Last Minute
acts the way we do control group Cramming Tips:
• Self-fulfilling prophecy: a belief that
leads to its own fulfillment (I expect you 1. Review Social. 95% likeliness to be
all to pass, you know this, you study – on the FRQ
fulfilling my prophecy) Apply – apply the concept to the
Context - scenario given – make sure 2. Review Cognition. 90% likeliness to
to refer to the prompt, don’t be on the FRQ.
Must have all 3 for FRQ – belief behavior change
3. Review Research – ENTIRE FRQ
 belief give random examples with GUARANTEED
no context. Use the terms 4. Review Confusing Pairs.
• Self-serving bias: tendency to attribute
from the prompt. 5. Make sure you know what the
our successes to internal, personal factors
& and our failures to external, situational sympathetic nervous system does
factors Apply - use the person’s name in and what correlation means.
• Spotlight effect (self-objectification) : Names - the prompt 6. Sleep.
tendency of an individual to overestimate 7. Eat.
the extent to which others are paying Synonyms – don’t parrot the prompt – 8. Don’t chug 3 Red Bulls.
attention to them try to use synonyms when
• Stereotype threat: feel at risk of possible
conforming to the group, influences your
behaviors, cognitions

Created by C.Thompson; 2013 - updated March 2023

colleenthompson@katyisd.org

You might also like