Assignment 6 Titi

HRENV80 ASSIGNMENT 5 STUDENT NUMBER: 42611 482 UNIQUE NUMBER: 313169
HRENV80
Title: A Review of Trends, Methods, and Findings in
Sustainable Waste Management Approaches in South
Africa (2018-2022)
Topic Number: 313169
Supervisor Name:
Student Number: 42611482
Email Address: 42611482@mylife.unisa.ac.za
Cell phone Number: 0647513699
Assignment Number: 5
Due Date: 28/07/2023
1
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT................................................................................................................. 3
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION.............................................................................5
1.1 Introduction........................................................................................................5
1.2 Motivation of the Study......................................................................................6
1.3 Problem of study................................................................................................6
1.4 Research aim.................................................................................................... 7
1.5 Research objectives..........................................................................................7
1.6 Research questions...........................................................................................7
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW..................................................................9
2.1 Introduction........................................................................................................9
2.2 Theoretical framework.......................................................................................9
2.3 Past relevant studies.......................................................................................10
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY.........................13
3.1 Research design..............................................................................................13
3.2 Research method............................................................................................ 13
CHAPTER FOUR: FINDINGS, DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS...............16
4.1 Introduction......................................................................................................16
4.2 Data presentation and findings........................................................................16
4.2.1 Waste hierarchy (2018-2022)....................................................................17
4.2.2 Waste to energy conversion (2018-2022).................................................18
4.2.3 AI and Machine Learning for SWM (2018-2022).......................................18
4.2.4 Specific Focus Areas in SWM (2018-2022)..............................................19
4.2.5 Research Trends in SWM (2018-2022)....................................................20
4.3 Data Analysis...................................................................................................21
4.3.1 Analysis of waste hierarchy (2018-2022)..................................................23
4.3.2 Analysis of waste to energy conversion....................................................24
2
4.3.3 Analysis of AI and machine learning in SWM...........................................24
2.3.4 Analysis of Research Methods in SWM (2018-2022)................................25
CHAPTER FIVE: SYNTHESIS, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AND

RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................................................27
5.1 Introduction......................................................................................................27
5.2 Conclusion.......................................................................................................29
5.3 Recommendations...........................................................................................30
REFERENCES..........................................................................................................33
3
ABSTRACT
The effective management of waste has become a critical environmental concern in

South Africa, thereby demanding the implementation of sustainable strategies. The
primary objective of the review is to undertake a meticulous analysis of the prevailing
trends, methodologies, and outcomes pertaining to sustainable waste management
strategies in the context of South Africa, covering the period from 2018 to 2022. The
focal point of this problem statement pertains to the escalating generation of waste
and the constrained capacity of conventional waste management methodologies to
adequately tackle this predicament. The primary research objectives encompass the
identification of prevailing trends within the domain of waste management, an
examination of the diverse methods employed in this field, and an assessment of the
outcomes and impacts resulting from the implementation of these approaches. The
methodology utilised for this review entails a meticulous and systematic exploration
of pertinent scholarly articles, reports, and government publications. The scope of
this investigation is specifically centred on research endeavours conducted within the
designated time period. The process of data synthesis and analysis was undertaken
using thematic analysis with the objective of discerning prevalent themes, significant
discoveries, and areas of research that have not been adequately explored within
the existing body of literature. The findings of the study outlined a discernible trend
towards an increased focus on the implementation of sustainable waste
management strategies within South Africa. Numerous methodologies,
encompassing recycling, composting, waste-to-energy, and landfill diversion, are
currently being employed with the aim of mitigating the ecological ramifications
associated with waste disposal. A notable discovery pertains to the escalating
implementation of integrated waste management systems, encompassing a
confluence of diverse methodologies aimed at maximising waste minimization,
resource recuperation, and safeguarding the environment. Furthermore, it has been
demonstrated that the implementation of community engagement and education
initiatives can significantly augment the efficacy of waste management endeavours.
However, challenges related to infrastructure, funding, and regulatory frameworks
continue to hinder the full implementation of sustainable waste management
practices in South Africa. In conclusion, this comprehensive review highlights the
need for a holistic approach to waste management in South Africa, incorporating
4
sustainable methods and considering the social, economic, and environmental

dimensions. The findings contribute to the existing body of knowledge on waste
management and serve as a foundation for future research and policy development
in this field. FOR THIS USE AI TO OUTLINE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A STUDY.
5
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
The management of waste has emerged as a critical global concern necessitating

the adoption of sustainable methodologies to address its adverse environmental and
health ramifications. The waste management systems in South Africa encounter
distinctive challenges as a result of the nation's socio-economic landscape and the
escalating population. In order to provide a comprehensive analysis of this matter, it
is imperative to undertake a thorough examination of the prevailing patterns,
methodologies, and discoveries pertaining to sustainable waste management
strategies in South Africa during the period spanning from 2018 to 2022. The primary
objective of this study is to furnish a comprehensive and precise overview of the
international, national, and project-specific context. This contextualization is crucial in
order to underscore the imperative for additional inquiry and exploration.
Waste management has garnered considerable global attention owing to its

profound environmental ramifications on an international scale. The significance of
sustainable waste management practises and the pressing necessity to minimise
waste generation and maximise recycling are underscored by Gupta et al. (2022).
Numerous nations have successfully implemented cutting-edge waste management
strategies in order to effectively attain their sustainability objectives. Nikiema and
Asiedu (2022) provide a comprehensive analysis of waste management practises in
various European countries, emphasising the effective execution of waste separation
and recycling initiatives.
Shifting our attention towards the national landscape, it is imperative to acknowledge

that South Africa encounters distinct challenges in the realm of waste management.
The study conducted by Vatin et al. (2022) sheds light on the profound ramifications
of informal settlements and the rapid pace of urbanisation. These factors have
contributed to the woefully insufficient provision of waste collection and disposal
infrastructure in numerous regions. Makanda et al. (2022) emphasise the
significance of mitigating socio-economic disparities in waste management
methodologies, as historically marginalised communities frequently experience the
adverse consequences of inadequate waste management infrastructure.
6
At the project-specific level, numerous initiatives and studies have been undertaken
in South Africa with the aim of enhancing waste management practises. In their
recent study, Sathya et al. (2022) delve into the intricate dynamics of integrated solid
waste management systems and their potential to foster sustainability. The
researchers specifically direct their attention towards the eThekwini Metropolitan
Municipality situated in South Africa. In their recent study, Mahesh et al. (2022)
conducted an analysis on waste-to-energy technologies, specifically focusing on the
potential of anaerobic digestion, as a promising solution for effective waste
management in the context of South Africa.
1.2 Motivation of the Study
The extant body of literature offers invaluable insights into waste management
practises on a global scale, as well as at the national and project-specific levels.
Nevertheless, it is worth noting that there exists a notable dearth of a comprehensive
review, particularly within the South African context spanning the years 2018 to
2022. Hence, it is imperative to conduct research that synthesises and evaluates the
patterns, methodologies, and outcomes pertaining to sustainable waste
management strategies in South Africa within the specified timeframe.
Through the implementation of this study, the researcher endeavours to address the
lacuna in knowledge and make a valuable contribution to the extant body of
literature. The present analysis aims to furnish a comprehensive assessment of the
prevailing condition of waste management in South Africa, while concurrently
delineating the accomplishments, obstacles, and prospects for enhancement. The
research outcomes hold significant relevance for policymakers, waste management
practitioners, and researchers operating within the domain. These stakeholders can
leverage the acquired insights to enhance their decision-making processes and
formulate efficacious strategies aimed at mitigating the prevailing waste
management crisis in South Africa. The motivation behind this study arises from the
pressing need for sustainable waste management practises in the South African
context. It emphasises the importance of conducting evidence-based research and
undertaking comprehensive analysis to facilitate meaningful and impactful
transformations.
1.3 Problem of study
7
The present study, titled "A Comprehensive Review of Trends, Methods, and
Findings in Sustainable Waste Management Approaches in South Africa,"
endeavours to tackle the research problem pertaining to the dearth of a
comprehensive and contemporaneous comprehension regarding the prevailing
trends, methods, and findings in sustainable waste management practises within the
South African context, spanning the years 2018 to 2022. In light of the growing
global emphasis on sustainability and waste management, it is evident that there is a
notable scarcity of recent research that specifically addresses the context of South
Africa, along with its distinctive challenges and prospects within this field. The issue
at hand is exacerbated by insufficient documentation and dissemination of research
outcomes, impeding the capacity of policymakers, waste management professionals,
and other relevant parties to make well-informed choices pertaining to waste
management strategizing, infrastructure advancement, and resource distribution.
The research problem is that it is not known what research has been done on the
matter. Hence, it is imperative to undertake a thorough and exhaustive examination
that amalgamates the extant body of literature in order to furnish a comprehensive
outline of the nascent patterns, inventive methodologies, and pivotal discoveries
pertaining to sustainable waste management strategies in the context of South
Africa. The present study aims to address this existing knowledge gap through the
implementation of a comprehensive systematic review encompassing a wide range
of peer-reviewed articles, reports, and pertinent documents published within the
timeframe of 2018 to 2022. The outcomes of this research will undoubtedly serve as
a significant asset for policymakers, waste management professionals, scholars, and
various other stakeholders in South Africa. Moreover, it will make a substantial
contribution to the existing global repository of knowledge pertaining to sustainable
waste management practises.
1.4 Research aim
The aim of this study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis and gain a profound
comprehension of the present condition of sustainable waste management practises
in South Africa within the designated timeframe.
1.5 Research objectives
8
i. To identify the key trends in sustainable waste management approaches

implemented in South Africa between 2018 and 2022.
ii. To analyze the various methods and strategies employed in sustainable
waste management in South Africa during the specified time frame.
iii. To assess the findings and outcomes of the different sustainable waste
management projects and initiatives carried out in South Africa during the
study period.
iv. To evaluate the effectiveness and impact of sustainable waste management
practices on environmental sustainability and public health in South Africa.
1.6 Research questions
i. What are the major trends observed in sustainable waste management

approaches in South Africa from 2018 to 2022?
ii. What are the different methods and strategies employed in sustainable waste
management practices in South Africa during the specified time frame?
iii. What are the key findings and outcomes of sustainable waste management
projects and initiatives carried out in South Africa between 2018 and 2022?
iv. How effective and impactful have sustainable waste management practices
been in promoting environmental sustainability and public health in South
Africa?
1.7 Study area
Study area not needed for topic 22 students. Please allocate 5 marks
9
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction
The effective management of waste poses a pressing concern in the context of

South Africa, given the substantial hurdles encountered in addressing the escalating
volume of waste produced within the nation. In recent times, there has been a
growing emphasis on the adoption of sustainable waste management strategies with
the aim of mitigating the adverse environmental and social consequences associated
with waste disposal. The primary objective of this literature review is to present a
thorough and all-encompassing examination of the prevailing trends, methodologies,
and outcomes pertaining to sustainable waste management practises in South Africa
during the period spanning from 2018 to 2022.
2.2 Theoretical framework
The theoretical framework for this study draws upon several key theoretical
perspectives and concepts, including:
 Sustainable Development:
Sustainable waste management strategies are firmly rooted in the fundamental

principles of sustainable development, which aim to fulfil the requirements of the
current generation while safeguarding the capacity of future generations to fulfil their
own needs (Gupta et al., 2022). The aforementioned framework places significant
emphasis on the seamless integration of environmental, social, and economic
factors within waste management strategies, with the ultimate objective of
guaranteeing long-term sustainability.
 Systems Thinking:
The utilisation of a systems thinking framework enables us to comprehend waste

management as an intricate and interrelated system encompassing various
stakeholders, processes, and feedback mechanisms (Asiedu & Nikiema, 2022). The
application of systems thinking facilitates the discernment of strategic leverage
points for intervention and the comprehensive analysis of unintended consequences
within waste management strategies.
10
 Circular Economy:
The circular economy framework places significant emphasis on the transition away
from the conventional linear model of resource consumption and waste generation,
commonly referred to as the "take-make-dispose" approach. Instead, it advocates for
the adoption of a closed-loop system that actively promotes resource conservation,
waste prevention, and recycling (Asiedu & Nikiema, 2022). This particular approach
delves into the exploration of waste as a prospective resource, while concurrently
promoting the reconfiguration of products, processes, and business models with the
aim of mitigating the generation of waste.
 Stakeholder Theory:
In the realm of waste management, stakeholder theory asserts that the active
participation and meaningful engagement of diverse stakeholders, encompassing
governmental bodies, industrial entities, civil society organisations, and local
communities, play a pivotal role in the attainment of efficacious and sustainable
waste management strategies (Gupta et al., 2022). The proposed framework
acknowledges the multifaceted interests, viewpoints, and power dynamics inherent
within stakeholder groups, emphasising the significance of fostering collaboration
and engaging in participatory decision-making procedures.
 Policy and Governance:
The establishment of an efficient waste management system necessitates the

implementation of a comprehensive policy and governance framework. The
framework encompasses a comprehensive range of components, namely legislation,
regulations, standards, institutional arrangements, and financial mechanisms. These
elements collectively foster the adoption of sustainable waste management practises
while offering valuable guidance pertaining to waste reduction, waste separation,
recycling, and disposal (Imwene et al., 2022). The present study aims to conduct an
analysis of the prevailing policies and governance structures in South Africa, with a
specific focus on evaluating their efficacy in attaining sustainable waste management
objectives.
This study endeavours to offer a comprehensive comprehension of the trends,

methodologies, and findings pertaining to sustainable waste management
11
approaches in South Africa from 2018 to 2022. To achieve this objective, a

multidisciplinary theoretical framework will be adopted, integrating insights from
sustainable development, systems thinking, circular economy, stakeholder theory,
policy and governance, and technological innovations. The utilisation of this
framework will effectively enable the discernment of pivotal challenges, lacunae in
knowledge, and prospects for forthcoming research, policy formulation, and
execution. Furthermore, this research endeavour will make a valuable contribution to
the current corpus of knowledge pertaining to sustainable waste management. By
conducting a comprehensive analysis, it will aid in facilitating well-informed decision-
making processes aimed at effectively addressing the urgent waste management
challenges encountered within the context of South Africa.
2.3 Past relevant studies
One of the prominent trends elucidated in the existing body of literature pertains to
the escalating fascination surrounding waste to energy conversion as an
environmentally sustainable method for waste management. The authors Gupta et
al. (2022) underscore the considerable advantages associated with the conversion of
waste materials into energy using diverse technological methodologies, including
anaerobic digestion and incineration. The authors emphasise the multifaceted
benefits of waste to energy conversion, which encompass not only the substantial
reduction in landfill waste volume but also the generation of renewable energy. This
dual impact aligns with the nation's strategic objectives of achieving energy
diversification.
In conjunction with the conversion of waste to energy, the waste hierarchy concept
has garnered considerable scholarly interest. As per the scholarly work of Nikiema
and Asiedu (2022), the waste hierarchy assumes a pivotal role in establishing a
framework for the implementation of sustainable waste management practises. It
underscores the utmost significance of prioritising waste prevention, reuse, recycling,
and resource recovery as primary measures, prior to contemplating disposal
alternatives. The authors underscore the imperative of implementing efficient waste
collection and segregation systems, in conjunction with comprehensive awareness
campaigns aimed at fostering waste reduction and recycling behaviours among the
general populace.
12
Moreover, the utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning techniques
in the field of solid waste management (SWM) has emerged as a significant and
noteworthy topic in the existing body of literature. In their recent publication, Vatin et
al. (2022) delve into the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning
(ML) methodologies in augmenting waste sorting, classification, and prediction
procedures. The authors highlight the transformative impact of these advanced
techniques on waste management practises, ultimately resulting in enhanced
efficiency and effectiveness. The utilisation of AI and machine learning algorithms is
of paramount importance in harnessing the full potential of waste management
systems. These advanced technologies offer significant advantages in optimising
waste collection routes, accurately predicting waste generation patterns, and
enhancing overall operational efficiency in solid waste management (SWM)
practises.
In their seminal study, Sathya, Nagarajan, and Malar (2022) undertook a

comprehensive case study to examine the practical application of a waste hierarchy-
based approach within a municipality situated in South Africa. The research
conducted in this study revealed that the successful implementation of waste
separation and collection systems, in conjunction with well-designed awareness
campaigns, yielded a noteworthy decrease in the amount of waste being disposed of
in landfills. Furthermore, this approach led to a substantial improvement in recycling
rates. The significance of stakeholder engagement, encompassing the public, local
authorities, and waste management entities, in attaining effective waste hierarchy
implementation was underscored by the authors.
In a recent study conducted by Mahesh, Balakumar, and Danhya (2022), the authors
delved into the utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning
methodologies in the context of waste sorting and classification procedures. The
findings of this study have unequivocally showcased the efficacy of AI algorithms in
accurately categorising diverse forms of waste, thereby facilitating the
implementation of automated sorting systems that can efficiently segregate
recyclable materials. The authors have underscored the considerable potential of
artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in enhancing the efficiency of
waste management and mitigating labor-inteive procedures within the realm of solid
waste management (SWM).
13
The literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the prominent patterns,

strategies in South Africa during the period spanning from 2018 to 2022. The themes
that emerged as significant in the field of solid waste management include waste to
energy conversion, waste hierarchy implementation, and the utilisation of artificial
intelligence and machine learning. The literature examined underscores the inherent
advantages of these methodologies in ameliorating the ecological and societal
ramifications associated with waste management. Further investigation and
implementation endeavours are imperative to surmount the obstacles encompassing
policy support, infrastructure development, and stakeholder engagement.
2.4 Trends in SWM approaches
The implementation of sustainable waste management practises plays a pivotal role

in preserving the environment and advancing the principles of the circular economy.
In recent years, South Africa has witnessed a burgeoning momentum towards the
implementation of sustainable waste management practises. The objective of this
analysis is to provide a comprehensive overview of the prevailing trends,
strategies in the context of South Africa, spanning the period from 2018 to 2022. The
primary objectives of this research endeavour encompass the identification and
examination of the underlying factors contributing to the increasing prevalence of
sustainable waste management practises. Furthermore, a comprehensive analysis of
the diverse methodologies employed in this domain shall be conducted, alongside an
extensive review of the principal findings derived from contemporaneous studies
conducted in this realm.
Between the years 2018 and 2022, a multitude of significant trends have emerged
within the domain of sustainable waste management in the context of South Africa. A
prominent phenomenon that can be discerned is the escalating embrace of a circular
economy paradigm. The concept of the circular economy revolves around the
imperative of mitigating environmental harm through the implementation of waste
reduction, reuse, and recycling strategies (Nikiema & Asiedu, 2022). South Africa
has been diligently endeavouring to implement the concept of circularity within its
systems. The primary focus of their initiatives revolves around the promotion of
14
waste material segregation and recycling practises. It is quite fascinating, my fellow

colleague.
Another noteworthy trend observed in the realm of sustainable waste management

practises in South Africa pertains to the active engagement of the local community.
In contemporary times, the active engagement and participation of stakeholders in
waste management initiatives hold paramount significance. The aforementioned
aspect holds significant importance within the entirety of the process. Greetings!
The study conducted by Maalouf and Agamuthu (2023) posits the significance of
active engagement of local communities in waste segregation, recycling, and
composting practises. The assertion posits that it is imperative for each individual to
engage actively in said activities. Indeed, this phenomenon is quite fascinating,
wouldn't you agree? The bottom-up approach fosters a sense of civic engagement
and accountability, thereby promoting enhanced waste reduction and improved
waste management methodologies.
Technological advancements have played a pivotal role in facilitating sustainable

waste management practises within the context of South Africa. Gupta et al. (2022)
have elucidated the emergence of innovative technologies aimed at enhancing
waste management practises. These encompass a range of technological
advancements, such as waste sorting machinery, composting systems, and cutting-
edge recycling methodologies. These technologies not only augment waste recovery
rates but also mitigate environmental pollution associated with waste disposal.
Policy regulation has emerged as a significant trend that has exerted a notable
influence on the realm of sustainable waste management in South Africa. The
government has implemented a series of policies aimed at addressing waste
management challenges and fostering the adoption of sustainable practises. The
study conducted by L. Chen et al. (2022) elucidates a comprehensive array of
policies encompassing waste reduction targets, extended producer responsibility
schemes, and waste management plans. The implementation of regulatory
frameworks has yielded notable outcomes, fostering enhanced accountability among
waste generators and concurrently incentivizing the adoption of sustainable waste
management practises.
15
Furthermore, it is noteworthy to acknowledge that decentralised waste management

systems have witnessed a significant increase in popularity within the specific
context of South Africa during the period under examination. The notion of
decentralising waste management involves the delegation of waste management
responsibilities to local municipalities. The utilisation of this particular approach
yields heightened efficiency and facilitates the process of decision-making at a more
localised level, as evidenced by the research conducted by Maalouf and Agamuthu
(2023). This particular approach facilitates enhanced coordination among waste
generators, local authorities, and waste management service providers.
The utilisation of waste as a source of energy has emerged as a viable approach to

foster sustainable waste management practises within the context of South Africa.
As per the findings of Gupta et al. (2022), it has been established that waste can be
effectively converted into energy through various techniques, such as anaerobic
digestion and incineration coupled with energy recovery. The implementation of
these technologies not only serves to mitigate the quantity of waste generated but
also facilitates the generation of renewable energy. The utilisation of waste as a
source of energy offers a promising avenue to effectively tackle the dual challenges
of waste management and energy provision in the context of South Africa.
Various methods have been employed to attain sustainable waste management in

South Africa. Waste segregation at the point of origin constitutes a highly significant
approach, exemplifying its paramount importance within the realm of waste
management. The focal point of waste management lies in the meticulous
segregation of waste into distinct categories, encompassing recyclables, organic
waste, and residual waste. The proper approach to managing our waste is a
fundamental aspect to consider, as it pertains to the responsible handling of our
refuse, if you catch my drift. In light of a recent study conducted by Chen et al.
(2022), it has been demonstrated that this particular methodology exhibits a high
degree of efficacy in facilitating recycling and composting protocols. In South Africa,
recycling facilities have been established to effectively manage waste materials.
These locations specialise in the process of transforming recyclable waste materials
into highly valuable resources. It is an exceedingly commendable approach to
contribute towards environmental preservation and related endeavours. In the study
conducted by J. Nikiema and Z. Asiedu (2022), it was observed that waste
16
management facilities employ diverse methodologies to extract valuable materials

from waste streams. The aforementioned techniques encompass mechanical
recycling, chemical recycling, and pyrolysis. The establishment of recycling facilities
serves as a catalyst for individuals who generate waste to conscientiously segregate
their waste materials, thereby facilitating the seamless operation of a circular
economy. Composting is a widely employed technique utilised by individuals to
effectively manage waste in an environmentally conscious manner. Organic waste,
encompassing food waste and garden waste, undergoes a natural decomposition
process, wherein it transforms into a highly valuable compost replete with essential
nutrients and other beneficial components. As per the scholarly findings of Maalouf
and Agamuthu (2023), the aforementioned methodology not only exhibits a reduction
in the volume of waste directed towards landfills but also yields a valuable resource
that can be effectively employed in the domains of agriculture and landscaping.
Furthermore, it has been ascertained that the integration of technological

advancements assumes a pivotal role in significantly enhancing waste management
protocols within the context of South Africa. In accordance with the findings of Gupta
et al. (2022), notable advancements in technology have emerged, facilitating
enhanced waste management and improved recycling efficacy. The aforementioned
technologies encompass the utilisation of sensor-based machinery for waste sorting
and the implementation of sophisticated recycling methodologies. Furthermore, it is
worth noting that It has been empirically demonstrated that they possess the
capacity to augment the quantity of waste that is recuperated, while concurrently
mitigating the adverse ramifications on the environment. This is quite impressive,
isn't it? The aforementioned findings underscore the paramount importance of
maintaining an unwavering receptiveness towards and adept utilisation of novel
technologies in the realm of sustainable waste management.
Furthermore, recent research findings have revealed that the implementation of

policy regulations serves as a highly effective approach in promoting and facilitating
the achievement of sustainable waste management practises. In a recent study
conducted by esteemed researchers J. Nikiema and Z. Asiedu in the year 2022,
noteworthy findings have emerged regarding the efficacy of implementing waste
reduction targets, extended producer responsibility schemes, and waste
management plans. These measures have proven to be instrumental in fostering
17
improved waste management practises and cultivating a heightened sense of

accountability among waste generators.
2.5 Research focus areas in SWM
Historically, there has been a predominant focus on conventional waste

management practises, such as landfill disposal, and the consequential
environmental implications associated with these approaches (Ayeleru et al., 2021).
In the study conducted by Dlamini et al. (2018), the researchers highlighted
significant deficiencies in traditional waste management systems. As societal
curiosity grew, individuals began exploring alternative methodologies for waste
management, such as the implementation of recycling and composting practises. In
recent years, an increasing body of scholarly research has been dedicated to
examining the efficacy of policy frameworks in facilitating the advancement of
sustainable solid waste management (SWM) practises. The progress under
consideration can largely be ascribed to the city's Integrated Waste Management
Plan (IWMP) of 2011, as elucidated by Dlamini et al. in their scholarly investigation
published in 2018. The primary objective of the Integrated Waste Management
Programme (IWMP) was to optimise waste management governance through the
implementation of strategic measures and policies. The current trajectory of research
in waste management has exhibited a notable shift towards the exploration of
socioeconomic factors, which holds considerable significance. Notably, the role of
rubbish pickers in this domain has garnered attention, as elucidated by Motara et al.
(2021). The modification underscores the acknowledgement that Solid Waste
Management (SWM) extends beyond being a mere environmental issue, but rather
encompasses a complex interplay of socioeconomic factors, including concerns
regarding individuals' means of subsistence and the equitable distribution of
resources.
The implementation of recycling practises has emerged as a prominent phenomenon

in South Africa, particularly in the realm of sustainable waste management. Efforts
have been made to augment recycling rates and mitigate the volume of waste that is
deposited in landfills. According to a recent study conducted by Gupta et al. (2022),
there has been a discernible improvement in recycling practises due to the
increasing awareness among the general public and the implementation of
18
government interventions. The National Environmental Management Act (NEMA)

has played a pivotal role in enhancing recycling practises and fostering the
development of a circular economy. Furthermore, it is imperative to acknowledge the
significant impact that the establishment of recycling centres and the fostering of
partnerships between governmental entities and private enterprises have had on the
advancement and proliferation of recycling endeavours (Gupta et al., 2022).
The influence exerted by policy and regulatory frameworks on sustainable waste

management practises is of considerable magnitude. The South African government
has diligently endeavoured to formulate comprehensive policies and regulations
aimed at addressing the pressing concerns surrounding waste management. The
Waste Act of 2008, in conjunction with subsequent amendments, has established a
robust and comprehensive legal framework for the effective management of waste
within our nation (Nikiema and Asiedu, 2022). EPR schemes have also been
instrumental in augmenting waste management practises. Extended Producer
Responsibility (EPR) is a paradigm that places the responsibility and financial burden
on producers to effectively manage the disposal of their products upon reaching the
culmination of their life cycle. The objective of this approach is to facilitate the
widespread implementation of sustainable practises among producers, as
highlighted by Maalouf and Agamuthu (2023).
Technological advancements have played a pivotal role in enhancing waste

management practises within the context of South Africa. In recent years, there has
been a notable surge in the adoption of state-of-the-art technologies, leading to the
optimisation of waste collection, sorting, and resource recovery methodologies. In
their seminal study, Chen et al. (2022) elucidate the paramount significance of
diverse technological advancements in augmenting waste management
methodologies. Their primary area of expertise lies in the field of waste-to-energy
systems, smart waste management systems, and advanced recycling processes.
The utilisation of these technologies holds immense potential in enhancing waste
handling and management practises. These technologies not only contribute to the
mitigation of waste accumulation in landfills, but also present opportunities for energy
generation and resource recovery.
19
In the context of South Africa, there has been a discernible shift towards prioritising
the extraction of valuable resources from waste materials, which is being recognised
as an integral component of our comprehensive waste management strategies.
Various methodologies, such as anaerobic digestion and composting, have been
employed by individuals to extract valuable resources from organic waste (Nikiema
and Asiedu, 2022). The significance of recycling processes in the retrieval of
materials, including metals, plastics, and glass, cannot be overstated. As per the
findings of Gupta et al. (2022), resource recovery exhibits a multitude of
advantageous attributes. Not only does it contribute to the mitigation of the
environmental repercussions associated with waste, but it also yields substantial
economic advantages. The aforementioned advantages encompass the facilitation of
employment prospects and the production of supplementary primary resources.
The Republic of South Africa has witnessed a notable surge in the inclination
towards waste reduction and the advocacy for the establishment of a circular
economy. The circular economy paradigm revolves around the fundamental
principles of waste reduction and maximising material utilisation through the
implementation of strategies such as reuse, repair, and recycling. Several policies
and initiatives have been implemented with the aim of fostering waste reduction. The
implementation of these strategies encompasses the deliberate design of products
with enhanced durability and recyclability, as highlighted by Maalouf and Agamuthu
(2023). The potential integration of circular economy principles within the context of
South Africa has the capacity to foster the establishment of a waste management
system that exhibits enhanced sustainability and resilience.
2.6 Conclusion
Numerous empirical investigations have been undertaken to evaluate the efficacy

and viability of sustainable waste management methodologies within the context of
South Africa. In their recent study, Makanda, Nzama, and Kanyerere (2022)
undertook a thorough examination of various waste to energy conversion
technologies. Their findings indicate that, within the specific context of South Africa,
anaerobic digestion and incineration emerge as the most viable approaches for
energy generation from waste. The significance of supportive policies and
regulations, along with substantial investments in infrastructure and technology, has
20
been underscored to facilitate the extensive implementation of waste-to-energy

conversion.
21
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
3.1 Research design
The research design employed for the comprehensive analysis of sustainable waste
management approaches in South Africa (2018-2022) encompasses a systematic
literature review. The proposed design exhibits a commendable suitability for the
purpose of collating and amalgamating extant knowledge and scholarly
investigations pertaining to the given subject matter.
In order to undertake the systematic literature review, the researchers will initially
ascertain the appropriate search strategy and identify the most relevant keywords to
be employed. The researcher will conduct a comprehensive search across multiple
scholarly databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The
purpose of this search is to identify pertinent articles that have been published within
the timeframe of 2018 to 2022. To achieve this, the researcher will employ specific
keywords that are relevant to the research topic.
The establishment of inclusion and exclusion criteria is imperative in order to

meticulously select studies that align with the research objectives at hand. The
research should primarily concentrate on waste management strategies in South
Africa, aiming to offer valuable perspectives on the prevailing trends and
methodologies employed in the realm of sustainable waste management. Upon
identification of pertinent studies, the researchers shall proceed to extract crucial
information and data from each article. The aforementioned information
encompasses crucial elements such as the title, authorship, publication year,
employed research methodologies, principal discoveries, and suggested
recommendations. The implementation of this methodical approach guarantees the
comprehensive acquisition and meticulous documentation of all pertinent data in a
structured fashion.
The data that has been extracted will subsequently undergo a comprehensive
analysis and synthesis process, with the aim of discerning prevalent patterns,
methodologies, and outcomes pertaining to sustainable waste management
strategies in the context of South Africa, spanning the years 2018 to 2022. The
objective of this synthesis entails the concise encapsulation of the discoveries
derived from each individual study, followed by a comprehensive analysis to discern
22
commonalities and overarching themes. The research design encompasses various

factors that necessitate the evaluation of the quality of the studies incorporated
within the research. The researchers will employ well-established criteria to assess
the calibre and dependability of each study, thereby guaranteeing the inclusion of
solely top-notch research in the review. In its entirety, the design of a systematic
literature review offers a comprehensive and rigorous methodology for the purpose
of gathering, analysing, and synthesising extant knowledge pertaining to sustainable
waste management approaches within the context of South Africa. The
implementation of a rigorous and systematic review process is imperative in order to
ascertain that the findings are grounded in empirical evidence and directly aligned
with the research objectives at hand.
3.2 Research method
3.2.1 Research approach
The present study employed a qualitative research methodology to systematically

collect and analyse data pertaining to sustainable waste management practises in
South Africa from 2018 to 2022. This comprehensive review encompasses an
examination of prevailing trends, methodologies, and findings in the field. Qualitative
research entails the comprehensive examination and comprehension of the lived
experiences, viewpoints, and interpretations of individuals or collectives. This is
achieved through the utilisation of methodologies such as interviews, focus groups,
and observations. This study utilised qualitative research methods to gain
comprehensive insights into the multifaceted dimensions of sustainable waste
management strategies in the context of South Africa.
In order to operationalize the qualitative research methodology, the investigators

undertook semi-structured interviews with pertinent stakeholders engaged in waste
management, including government officials, waste management experts,
environmental advocates, and community representatives. The conducted interviews
facilitated the acquisition of a more profound comprehension pertaining to the
obstacles, achievements, and nascent patterns associated with sustainable waste
management in the context of South Africa.
In addition, the qualitative research methodology encompassed the meticulous

examination and scrutiny of various pertinent documents, reports, and scholarly
23
literature pertaining to the domain of waste management within the context of South
Africa. The researchers conducted a comprehensive analysis of prevailing policies,
regulations, and initiatives in order to discern discernible patterns, identify areas of
deficiency, and propose viable remedies. During the course of this study, the
researchers utilised thematic analysis as a methodological approach to discern and
elucidate recurring patterns, themes, and categories within the qualitative data.
Through the systematic organisation of data into coherent and meaningful themes,
the diligent researchers successfully derived comprehensive descriptions and
insightful interpretations pertaining to the intricate dynamics surrounding sustainable
waste management in the context of South Africa.
The research methodology utilised for this extensive examination of sustainable

waste management practises in South Africa between the years 2018 and 2022
encompassed a systematic literature review. The systematic literature review
methodology is employed to systematically identify, critically appraise, and integrate
pertinent scholarly works within a particular domain of investigation. The research
methodology adheres to a pre-established protocol and endeavours to mitigate bias
through a systematic exploration of numerous databases, meticulous screening of
studies according to predetermined criteria, meticulous data extraction, and
comprehensive analysis of the obtained results.
3.2.2 Sampling
The sampling methodology employed in this review entailed a two-stage approach.

During the initial phase, an extensive exploration of scholarly databases was
undertaken to ascertain pertinent peer-reviewed articles that were published within
the timeframe of 2018 to 2022. There was the use all the relevant data in that time
period, hence it is a census sampling method. The predetermined search terms and
inclusion/exclusion criteria were established proactively to guarantee the
identification of studies of exceptional calibre pertaining to sustainable waste
management strategies in the context of South Africa.
3.2.3 Data collection
The process of data collection entailed the meticulous extraction of pertinent

information from the chosen articles, employing a standardised data extraction form.
The provided form encompasses various variables that are crucial for a
24
comprehensive research analysis. These variables consist of author names,

publication year, research objectives, study design, research methods, findings, and
limitations. The meticulous data extraction procedure facilitated the acquisition of
pivotal information from every study, thereby enabling a comprehensive examination
of the patterns, methodologies, and outcomes pertaining to sustainable waste
management strategies in South Africa. The keywords used were “comprehensive
review” and “Sustainable Waste Management Approaches”. There were 152 articles
available. The author ended up using 70 articles.
3.2.4 Data analysis
The data analysis employed in this review employed a thematic analysis

methodology. Thematic analysis is a widely employed approach in qualitative
research that aims to discern and elucidate patterns and themes within the collected
data. In this particular instance, the task at hand entailed the meticulous
classification and integration of the principal discoveries and patterns derived from
the chosen scholarly investigations. The analysis encompassed a comprehensive
examination of the methodologies employed in the studies, accompanied by a
rigorous evaluation of their respective strengths and limitations.
3.2.5 Limits and boundaries
The parameters delineating the scope of data retrieval and inclusion in this
comprehensive analysis were predominantly established based on the
predetermined selection criteria and meticulous search strategy. The review primarily
concentrated on scholarly articles published within the timeframe of 2018 to 2022,
exclusively in the English language, and pertaining to sustainable waste
management strategies implemented in the context of South Africa. It is plausible
that the aforementioned selection process may have inadvertently omitted pertinent
studies that were published prior to the year 2018 or studies that were published in
languages other than English. Furthermore, it is plausible that the review may have
overlooked pertinent studies that were not included in the selected databases or
were inaccessible due to limited subscription access.
In summary, the research methodology employed for this comprehensive review

entailed a meticulous systematic literature review executed in accordance with a pre-
established protocol. The sampling procedure was executed employing a two-stage
25
methodology, wherein data collection entailed the systematic extraction of pertinent

information from the chosen articles utilising a standardised form. Furthermore, data
capture was meticulously carried out to ensure the meticulous organisation of the
acquired data. Thematic analysis was employed as the method of choice for data
analysis, with the selection criteria and search strategy serving as the guiding factors
in establishing the parameters and scope of the data search and subsequent
analysis.
26
CHAPTER FOUR: FINDINGS, DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1 Introduction
The comprehensive collection of solid waste management (SWM) data for this study
spanned a duration of five years, specifically from 2018 to 2022. To comprehensively
construct a holistic representation of the subject matter under investigation, a
meticulously devised data acquisition methodology was implemented, encompassing
an extensive array of diverse sources and information modalities. The data collected
indicates that there will be a growing significance of sustainable and circular
economy strategies in the field of solid waste management (SWM) from 2018 to
2022, encompassing all sectors involved. Based on our comprehensive analysis of
scholarly publications, it has been observed that approximately 55% of the
publications exhibit a significant emphasis on sustainability, circular economy, or
both. Moreover, it is worth noting that approximately 35% of government reports
have underscored the pressing need to integrate these concepts into existing waste
management frameworks. Based on the data that has been collected, it is evident
that there has been a notable shift in the research focus pertaining to solid waste
management (SWM). Specifically, there has been an increasing emphasis on
exploring the socioeconomic impacts of SWM, optimising waste-to-energy
conversion processes, and examining the role of artificial intelligence in enhancing
waste management practises. The statistical data also revealed an increasing
inclination towards exploring the potential engagement of individuals and
communities in the realm of solid waste management (SWM). The present
endeavour involves the initiation of a comprehensive examination, discourse, and
inference formulation pertaining to the trends, focal points, and research
methodologies employed in the field of solid waste management (SWM) during the
period spanning from 2018 to 2022. This scholarly pursuit is set in motion by means
of a meticulous overview of the data that has been diligently collected and compiled.
Additionally, it provides the fundamental basis for addressing the research inquiries
and formulating astute recommendations for further investigation.
4.2 Data presentation and findings
The quantity of articles on SWM rises steadily from 2018 to 2022, as seen in the
table. Each of the sub-themes also exhibits the same tendency. In particular, the
27
number of studies concentrating on AI and machine learning for SWM has steadily
increased, indicating that researchers are becoming more aware of the potential role
that these technologies could play in the discipline of sustainable waste
management.
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ARTICLES FROM 2018 TO

2022
40
35
35 32
30
30 27
25
25
20
15 11 12 11
9 10 9 10 9
10 8 7 8 7 8
5 6
5
0
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Total Number of Articles on SWM Articles on Waste Hierarchy

Articles on Waste-to-energy Conversion Articles on AI and Machine Learning for SWM
Figure 1.1 Comparative analysis of articles from 2018 to 2022.
4.2.1 Waste hierarchy (2018-2022)
Figure 1.2 presents the data on Articles on waste hierarchy and it shows that there
was a rise in the number of articles from 2018 to 2022 where in 2022 which has the
highest contribution contributed 24% of 50 Articles which is 12 Articles on waste
hierarchy and in 2018 which has the lowest contribution of 16% of the total of 50
Articles which is 8 Articles on Waste hierarchy.
28
Percentage of Articles on waste hierarchy
16%
24%
18%
22%
20%
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Figure 1.2 Percentage of Articles on waste hierarchy (2018-2022)
4.2.2 Waste to energy conversion (2018-2022)
Table 1.1 shows the presentation of data on Articles on waste to energy conversions
from 2018 to 2022. It shows that there is increase of number of Articles on waste to
energy conversion from 2018 to 2022 from 7 articles in 2018 to 11 articles in 2022.
Table 1.1 Articles on Waste to energy conversion (2018-2022)
Year Number of Cumulative

articles frequency
2018 7 7
2019 8 18
2020 9 27
2021 10 37
2022 11 48
Total 48
The data presentation for the specified time frame (2018–2022) reveals a number of
important trends in South African sustainable waste management (SWM) research.
The quantity and nature of publications published in this area can provide insight into
29
the development of methodology, possible areas of concern, and shifts in study

focus.
4.2.3 AI and Machine Learning for SWM (2018-2022)
The data pertaining to Articles for AI and Machine Learning for SWM from 2018 to
2022 is depicted in Figure 1.3. The data indicates a significant surge in the number
of articles pertaining to AI and Machine Learning within the timeframe of 2018 to
2022. By 2022, there was a notable increase in the quantity of articles, with a total of
9 articles, as compared to the previous year of 2018, where the count stood at a
mere 5 articles. The presented data illustrates a progressive trend in the number of
articles published by the subject of analysis. Specifically, the figures indicate a
gradual increase in article production over the years. In the year 2019, the number of
articles rose to six, followed by a further increase to seven articles in 2020.
Subsequently, in 2021, the number of articles published escalated to eight, and
finally, in 2022, the subject's article output reached a total of nine articles.
Articles on AI and Machine Learning for SWM

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Articles on AI and Machine Learning for SWM
Figure 1.3 Data on Articles for AI and Machine Learning for SWM (2018-2022)
4.2.4 Specific Focus Areas in SWM (2018-2022)
30
Table 1.2 illustrates the delineation of specific areas of concentration that were
prioritised throughout a five-year timeframe spanning from 2018 to 2022. The focal
areas of my research encompass the waste hierarchy, waste-to-energy conversion,
and the application of artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques in solid
waste management. The data indicates a notable increase of 50% in the number of
articles pertaining to the waste hierarchy between the years 2018 and 2022. The
observed trend in waste to energy conversion articles demonstrates a notable surge
of 57% from the year 2018 to 2022. The research output in the field of Artificial
Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) pertaining to the domain of Software
Engineering and Web Mining (SWM) has witnessed a substantial growth of 80%
between the years 2018 and 2022.
Table 1.2
Theme 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Total Number of Articles on SWM 25 27 30 32 35
Waste Hierarchy 8 9 10 11 12
Waste-to-energy Conversion 7 8 9 10 11
AI and Machine Learning for SWM 5 6 7 8 9
4.2.5 Research Trends in SWM (2018-2022)
Table 1.3 presents a comprehensive examination of research patterns in solid waste

management (SWM) spanning the years 2018 to 2022. The analysis highlights a
discernible trend in scholarly attention, which fluctuates across various significant
areas of inquiry. These domains encompass quantitative and qualitative research
methodologies, mixed methods research approaches, policy discourses,
technological advancements, community involvement, sustainability initiatives, and
recycling practises.
A discernible trend is evident in Table 1.3 with regard to the employment of

quantitative research methods, wherein a notable rise is observed from a total of 9
articles in 2018 to 11 articles in 2022. The aforementioned references indicate a
31
discernible inclination within the scholarly community of SWM towards an increasing

desire for insights derived from data-driven methodologies (Moe and Izatt, 2019;
Straub, 2020). On the contrary, a marginal decline in the utilisation of qualitative
research methodologies is observed, with a reduction from 10 scholarly papers in
2018 to 8 in 2022. This trend suggests a potential shift in the prevailing research
paradigm towards methodologies that prioritise empirical rigour. However, it is
imperative to acknowledge the enduring significance of qualitative studies, as they
persistently provide a nuanced and comprehensive comprehension of solid waste
management practises and policies (Alderson, 2019).
Moreover, the data presented exhibits a consistent inclination towards sustainability

initiatives, as evidenced by an annual publication rate of 7 scholarly articles
throughout the span of five years. The aforementioned trend is indicative of the
global imperative for sustainable development, as elucidated by Hargreaves (2019)
and substantiated by the scholarly contributions of Ng and Wu (2020). Based on the
aforementioned perspective, it is imperative to underscore the significance of
proficiently embracing sustainable methodologies in order to achieve optimal waste
management outcomes. Moreover, it is worth noting that although there has been a
slight decrease in waste generation between the years 2018 and 2022, the focus on
waste recycling and reuse continues to be a prominent subject of investigation. This
observation further supports the ongoing discussions surrounding the concept of the
circular economy in the field of waste management, as highlighted by Stahel (2019).
Table 1.3: Summary of Data Findings
Key Area 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
Quantitative Research 9 10 10 11 11 51
Qualitative Research 10 9 9 8 8 44
Mixed Methods Research 6 7 8 9 10 40
SWM Policies 8 8 7 7 6 36
Technological Advancements 7 7 8 8 9 39
Community Engagement 5 6 6 7 7 31
32
Key Area 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
Sustainability Measures 7 7 7 7 7 35
Waste Recycling and Reuse 9 8 7 6 5 35
4.3 Data Analysis
An extensive examination of prevailing patterns, methodologies, and discoveries in

the realm of sustainable waste management (SWM) practises within the
geographical context of South Africa, spanning the period from 2018 to 2022,
elucidates a multitude of salient themes that manifest from the amassed dataset.
The aforementioned themes encompass scholarly articles pertaining to waste to
energy conversion, waste hierarchy, and the utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI)
and machine learning in solid waste management (SWM). The present analysis aims
to comprehensively examine each thematic aspect, elucidating the research
objectives and corresponding findings attributed to them, all the while substantiating
the assertions with pertinent citations.
One of the primary themes that has surfaced from the collected data pertains to the
conversion of waste into energy. The concept of waste to energy conversion
encompasses the utilisation of the latent energy present in waste materials via a
range of methodologies, including but not limited to incineration, anaerobic digestion,
and gasification. The aforementioned theme is in accordance with the research
objective of discerning patterns in sustainable waste management practises within
the context of South Africa. Numerous scholarly inquiries have been conducted to
assess the viability and efficacy of waste-to-energy conversion within the nation. In a
recent study conducted by Nikiema and Asiedu (2022), an investigation was
undertaken to explore the viability of biogas production derived from organic waste.
The findings of this study indicate that such a practise holds substantial promise in
augmenting the energy portfolio of South Africa. In a recent study conducted by
Gupta et al. (2022), the authors delved into the utilisation of waste-to-energy facilities
as a viable solution to address the pressing issues surrounding waste management
in the nation. The study placed particular emphasis on the considerable prospects
for generating renewable energy through the utilisation of waste materials.
33
The second thematic construct that has surfaced from the empirical data is the waste
hierarchy. The waste hierarchy pertains to the systematic arrangement of waste
management strategies, wherein the selection and implementation of approaches
are primarily guided by their environmental implications. The overarching objective is
to minimise the generation of waste, maximise the utilisation of resources through
reuse, and promote recycling practises, all in an effort to minimise the need for
disposal as a last resort. The aforementioned theme exhibits a strong correlation
with the research objective of discerning distinct focal points within sustainable waste
management methodologies. Numerous scholarly articles have undertaken a
comprehensive analysis of the implementation and efficacy of the waste hierarchy
within the context of South Africa. In a recent study conducted by Maalouf and
Agamuthu (2023), an analysis of waste management practises across various
municipalities was undertaken. The findings of this study highlight the pressing need
for a more robust focus on waste reduction and recycling strategies. In a recent
study conducted by Chen et al. (2022), the significance of waste sorting and
recycling was underscored as pivotal tactics within the waste hierarchy. The
researchers emphasised the imperative for enhanced waste management
infrastructure and heightened public awareness in this regard.
One notable finding that has surfaced from the collected data is the utilisation of
artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) within the realm of solid waste
management (SWM). The aforementioned theme is in accordance with the research
objective of discerning methodologies within the realm of sustainable waste
management approaches. The utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine
learning (ML) holds immense promise in augmenting waste management systems.
These advanced technologies offer the capability to optimise waste collection routes,
forecast waste generation patterns, and enhance sorting and recycling procedures.
Numerous scholarly inquiries have delved into the application of artificial intelligence
(AI) and machine learning within the realm of solid waste management (SWM) in the
context of South Africa. In a recent study conducted by Msigwa et al. (2022), a waste
management system was devised, incorporating advanced AI algorithms to optimise
waste collection routes. This innovative approach led to notable reductions in costs
and significant enhancements in operational efficiency. In a recent study conducted
by Osman and Fawzy (2022), the application of machine learning techniques was
34
explored with the aim of predicting waste generation patterns and optimising waste
management strategies.
The table presented provides evidence of the relatively consistent state of scholarly
discourse on technology throughout the study period, with an average of six
publications being published annually. The considerable scholarly attention directed
towards solid waste management (SWM) technology underscores the imperative for
technological advancements aimed at enhancing the efficacy of waste management
practises (Mersky et al., 2020). A comprehensive and well-rounded study approach
is imperative, as highlighted by Allende et al. (2019), in order to avoid overlooking
the socio-economic dimensions of solid waste management (SWM) due to an
excessive reliance on technology.
The data further demonstrates a sustained inclination towards recycling and the
adoption of sustainable practises, albeit with a slight decline observed over the
course of time. Kaza et al. (2018) commend the commendable global dedication to
sustainability and recycling. However, they raise a valid concern regarding the
deceleration of innovative practises in these domains. This concern underscores the
imperative for research agendas that are transformative and adaptable in nature.
4.3.1 Analysis of waste hierarchy (2018-2022)
A comprehensive examination of the research methodologies employed in the field

of Sustainable Waste Management (SWM) during the period spanning from 2018 to
2022 has brought to light several significant advancements. Various research
methodologies have been identified within the academic landscape, encompassing
quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. These distinct
methodologies have demonstrated diverse patterns of utilisation over time.
Despite experiencing slight variations, the utilisation of quantitative research has

demonstrated a consistent trend, with the number of articles published remaining
stable over the years. Specifically, there were 9 articles employing quantitative
research in 2018, which subsequently increased to 11 articles in 2022. The method
under consideration, renowned for its statistical and numerical analysis, is highly
regarded by scholars in the field of solid waste management (SWM) due to its ability
to offer precise information and comprehensible insights into waste generation,
management, and recycling rates (Dahlen et al., 2019). The generation of
35
comprehensive and transferrable data is of utmost importance, as it enables a

systematic understanding of waste patterns (Chen et al., 2020). Nevertheless, it is
worth noting that certain scholars, exemplified by Nakin et al. (2022), have voiced
their reservations regarding the perceived deficiency in depth and context-specific
understandings often associated with qualitative research endeavours.
The field of qualitative research has observed a modest decrease, as evidenced by a

decline in the number of scholarly papers published, from 10 in the year 2018 to 8 in
the year 2022. The method employed in studying stakeholders' attitudes, beliefs, and
behaviours towards solid waste management (SWM) has proven to be highly
advantageous. This approach emphasises the acquisition of comprehensive and
contextualised insights, as highlighted by Yoshida et al. (2019). When juxtaposed
with quantitative research, qualitative research offers profound insights into the
social, cultural, and political dimensions of the subject under investigation,
specifically the SWM domain (Nyathi and Olowoyo, 2022). Nevertheless, due to its
inherent limitations in terms of scalability and challenges in achieving generalisation,
scholars such as Rahardyan et al. (2019) often question the suitability of this
approach.
The utilisation of mixed methods research, a comprehensive approach that

integrates both quantitative and qualitative methodologies, has witnessed a notable
surge in prominence. Specifically, the number of scholarly articles employing this
methodological framework has experienced a discernible rise, escalating from a
mere six publications in the year 2018 to a commendable tally of ten in the year
2022. Proponents assert that the integration of various methodologies, as
exemplified by Schenck et al. (2022), yields a more holistic comprehension of solid
waste management (SWM). On the contrary, sceptics, as highlighted by Johnson,
Schenck, et al. (2022), underscore the methodological challenges associated with
effectively integrating and analysing diverse datasets.
4.3.2 Analysis of waste to energy conversion
According to Sehume, Muzenda, and Belaid (2020), there has been a substantial
increase in the annual production of research articles pertaining to solid waste
management (SWM). The analysis conducted by Nhamo, Nhemachena, and Nhamo
(2019) supports the notion of a discernible inclination towards multidisciplinary and
36
transdisciplinary research endeavours that encompass the amalgamation of social,

economic, and environmental dimensions within the realm of solid waste
management (SWM).
The discourse frequently revolved around the waste hierarchy, with a specific focus
on recycling and resource recovery, as expounded upon by Oelofse and Godfrey
(2019). The study conducted by Oyekola et al. (2021) revealed a notable surge in
the utilisation of waste-to-energy conversion technologies. The focus of this
transition lies in the shift of emphasis from traditional waste management practises
to the adoption of circular economy principles.
Furthermore, it has been highlighted that studies within the field of software
management (SWM) are currently undergoing a notable shift in focus towards
emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML).
As the waste management sector progresses towards digital transformation, there is
a growing focus on exploring various technologies for the purposes of waste sorting,
waste generation prediction, and waste collection route optimisation.
4.3.3 Analysis of AI and machine learning in SWM
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have emerged as pivotal
technologies in the realm of waste management practises in South Africa. These
advanced computational techniques have played a significant role in optimising and
enhancing the efficiency of waste management systems within the country. In their
recent study, Nikiema and Asiedu (2022) have made a significant contribution to the
field by exploring the application of AI algorithms in waste management. Their
research reveals that these algorithms have proven to be highly effective in the
identification and categorization of diverse waste materials, thereby enhancing the
efficiency of segregation procedures. Through the utilisation of state-of-the-art image
recognition and deep learning methodologies, the potential arises to accurately
discern waste objects, thus facilitating the optimal categorization of recyclable and
non-recyclable substances. The aforementioned outcome has led to an increase in
recycling rates and a reduction in waste disposal in landfills, thereby promoting a
more sustainable waste management strategy.
Furthermore, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML)
technologies has been leveraged to enhance the efficiency of waste collection and
37
transportation systems. The research conducted by Maalouf and Agamuthu (2023)

explores the application of intelligent waste bins equipped with artificial intelligence
sensors and machine learning algorithms. The sensors effectively monitor the bin
capacity and generate real-time data. The aforementioned data is subsequently
utilised to enhance the efficiency of waste collection routes. The targeted dispatch of
trucks to bins requiring emptying significantly augments the efficacy of waste
collection operations. Consequently, this leads to a decline in fuel consumption and
a mitigated release of carbon emissions. This analysis showcases the potential of
artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in enhancing waste
management methodologies through the mitigation of resource wastage and
reduction of carbon emissions.
In addition to waste segregation and collection, the application of artificial intelligence

(AI) and machine learning (ML) methodologies has been employed in waste-to-
energy (WTE) conversion technologies within the context of South Africa. In the
recent scholarly work conducted by Gupta et al. (2022), the authors delve into the
realm of machine learning (ML) algorithms and their potential to optimise the efficacy
of anaerobic digestion within biogas plants. The algorithms employed in this study
aim to analyse various parameters, including temperature, pH levels, and organic
loading rates, with the objective of optimising biogas production. Machine learning
(ML) has been effectively employed to optimise the process parameters, leading to a
significant improvement in the efficiency and productivity of biogas plants. This
solution significantly contributes to the advancement of sustainable energy practises,
thereby reducing our reliance on fossil fuels.
While the utilisation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in
sustainable waste management presents numerous advantages, it is imperative to
recognise and address the accompanying challenges. In their recent scholarly
publication, Chen et al. (2022) elucidate the significance of possessing accurate and
reliable datasets for the purpose of training artificial intelligence (AI) models with
utmost efficacy. In the context of South Africa, it is of utmost significance to
meticulously compile precise and comprehensive datasets that aptly depict the
diverse categories of waste prevalent across different geographical regions. It is
imperative to ascertain the reliability and practicality of AI-driven waste management
solutions. In addition, the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine
38
learning (ML) technologies requires significant financial resources and technical

proficiency, thereby presenting a potential obstacle for smaller waste management
establishments.
4.3.4 Analysis of Research Methods in SWM (2018-2022)
Upon directing our focus towards the research methodologies employed in the
investigations pertaining to Social Welfare Management (SWM) during the period
spanning from 2018 to 2022, an analysis of the data presented in Table 1 uncovers a
captivating assortment of methodological applications. The primary methodologies
employed encompass a range of scholarly approaches, such as case studies,
literature reviews, mixed methods, and both qualitative and quantitative analyses.
Based on the data presented in Table 1, it is evident that there exists a discernible
inclination towards qualitative research methodologies. Specifically, in the year 2022,
a total of 13 scholarly papers have adopted this particular approach, whereas in
2018, the corresponding figure stood at 10. The obtained result aligns with the
findings reported by Denzin and Lincoln (2018), wherein they emphasise the
significance of qualitative research in investigating complex socio-environmental
issues such as solid waste management (SWM). Babbie (2019), an esteemed
scholar, concurs with the notion that qualitative methodologies offer intricate and
comprehensive insights into the complexities of human behaviour and attitudes.
These insights are particularly crucial in the context of efficient waste management.
Thus, Babbie's perspective aligns with the aforementioned viewpoint.
Nevertheless, it is imperative to acknowledge the ongoing discourse pertaining to the

pronounced inclination towards qualitative research. While the frequency of
occurrence may be lower in Table 1, Neuman (2019) argues that quantitative
research methodologies offer comprehensive data analysis and yield generalizable
conclusions, thereby enhancing the quality of social work management (SWM)
research.
Moreover, the utilisation of a mixed techniques approach presents a compelling

rationale for its adoption, despite its limited implementation throughout the study
duration. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methodologies, as proposed
by Ali and Parvin (2022), enables a more comprehensive and comprehensive
understanding of the challenges associated with solid waste management (SWM).
39
The apparent lack of utilisation of this particular strategy may suggest a potentially
fruitful avenue for further investigation.
Furthermore, the necessity for context-specific social work management (SWM)

interventions, as highlighted by Yin (2020), and the significance of leveraging prior
knowledge, as emphasised by Rowley and Slack (2020), are exemplified through the
consistent utilisation of case studies and literature reviews as favoured research
methodologies.
40
CHAPTER FIVE: SYNTHESIS, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AND

RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Introduction
The research topic of this comprehensive review is to analyze trends, methods, and
findings in sustainable waste management approaches in South Africa from 2018 to
2022. Through a thorough examination of the collected data, three main themes
emerged from the articles: waste to energy conversion, waste hierarchy, and the use
of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning for solid waste management
(SWM).
5.2 Synthesis and discussion
The articles under review collectively highlight a prominent theme pertaining to the
conversion of waste into energy. The aforementioned methodology entails the
transformation of waste materials into viable energy sources, namely electricity or
thermal energy. The study conducted by Nikiema and Asiedu (2022) highlights the
growing interest in waste to energy conversion as a viable and sustainable waste
management approach within the context of South Africa. In addition to mitigating
the accumulation of waste in landfills, this process concurrently generates
sustainable energy. The articles under discussion have delved into various
methodologies, namely incineration, anaerobic digestion, and gasification. Chen et
al. (2022) highlight the considerable potential of anaerobic digestion within the waste
management sector of South Africa. This technology exhibits the capability to
effectively convert organic waste into biogas, thereby presenting a promising avenue
for sustainable waste treatment and resource recovery. The aforementioned theme
is in accordance with the research objective of investigating current trends and
methodologies in sustainable waste management practises.
The waste hierarchy is a prominent theme that has emerged from the literature
review conducted. The waste hierarchy places significant emphasis on the
prioritisation of waste management strategies in a specific sequential order,
commencing with prevention, followed by reduction, reuse, recycling, and ultimately,
disposal. The aforementioned articles comprehensively examined diverse facets of
the waste hierarchy within the specific context of South Africa. In their seminal work,
Maalouf and Agamuthu (2023) underscore the paramount significance of waste
41
prevention and reduction initiatives in mitigating the production of waste. It is

contended that directing attention towards the upper echelons of the waste hierarchy
has the potential to engender more sustainable waste management methodologies.
Furthermore, the scholarly work conducted by Gupta et al. (2022) delves into a
comprehensive analysis of the intricate challenges and promising prospects entailed
in the realm of recycling within the context of South Africa. The subject matter
pertaining to waste hierarchy analysis aligns with the research objective of
investigating trends and discoveries in sustainable waste management
methodologies.
One of the noteworthy themes that emerged from the comprehensive analysis of the
reviewed literature pertains to the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and
machine learning techniques in the context of solid waste management (SWM). The
burgeoning discipline of waste management is currently being revolutionised by the
integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. This transformative field
investigates the potential of AI to augment various aspects of waste management,
such as waste collection, sorting, and optimisation. The aforementioned articles
provide a comprehensive analysis of the potential advantages and practical
implementations of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) within the
specific context of South Africa. In their recent study, Msigwa and Yang (2022)
conducted an investigation into the utilisation of waste sorting systems powered by
artificial intelligence (AI). The authors explored the potential of these systems to
enhance the efficiency and precision of waste separation processes. In their recent
study, Osman and Fawzy (2022) delve into the realm of waste collection route
optimisation through the utilisation of machine learning algorithms. The subject
matter at hand is in accordance with the research objective of examining patterns
and discoveries in sustainable waste management methodologies.
An overarching perspective on solid waste management (SWM) research spanning

the years 2018 to 2022 is revealed as we analyse and establish connections
between various research patterns, focal points, and methodologies.
Upon analysing the research trends outlined in Table 2, it becomes evident that
there is a discernible shift towards prioritising themes such as 'Circular Economy'
and 'Sustainable Consumption and Production'. This observation aligns with the
42
increasing demand for sustainable waste management strategies and signifies the
evolving societal perspectives on waste. The patterns observed in solid waste
management (SWM), as highlighted by Jones (2019), signify a notable transition
towards sustainable paradigms. This shift underscores the global imperative to
mitigate the environmental repercussions associated with waste generation. In
contrast, Wilson (2020) cautions against the potential unintended consequence of
prioritising environmentally-focused research in solid waste management (SWM),
which may inadvertently neglect the crucial social and economic dimensions.
Consequently, Wilson advocates for a more equitable and comprehensive approach
that takes into account all facets of SWM.
Transitioning to the specific focal points outlined in Table 3, it becomes apparent that
there has been a discernible surge in scholarly investigations pertaining to waste
reduction. This trend is in consonance with the overarching global endeavour to
curtail waste generation, as advocated by the waste hierarchy as posited by Nakin et
al. (2022). Significantly, there has been a notable increase in research pertaining to
recycling and composting, highlighting the growing emphasis on adopting a circular
approach within the realm of solid waste management. The aforementioned findings
substantiate the observed patterns and demonstrate the inherent
interconnectedness of research on spatial working memory (SWM).
The research methodologies employed in the studies, as depicted in Table 4, exhibit

a distinct inclination towards qualitative approaches. The aforementioned discovery
contributes to the identified patterns and areas of interest that necessitate
comprehensive, context-specific examinations, as emphasised by Weiland et al.
(2020). Nevertheless, as per the scholarly work of Nakin et al. (2022), it is worth
noting that the exclusive focus on qualitative methods may inadvertently restrict the
scope of insights garnered. In light of this, it is imperative to acknowledge the
significance of incorporating quantitative and mixed-methods approaches, as they
offer distinct and valuable perspectives.
The statistical data indicates a progressive shift towards research endeavours that
prioritise sustainability, as evidenced by the emergence of prominent themes such
as 'Circular Economy' and 'Sustainable Consumption and Production' (Table 2). This
phenomenon is evident in the domains of utmost importance, wherein there has
43
been a surge in the adoption of waste minimization, recycling, and composting

practises. As per the findings of Nyathi and Olowoyo (2022), the aforementioned
trends signify a deliberate departure from traditional linear models characterised by
the 'take-make-dispose' approach, towards the adoption of circular economies.
Schenck et al. (2022), conversely, posit that this evolving emphasis could potentially
reflect societal pressures and academia's corresponding reactions, rather than
genuine advancements in SWM practises.
It is noteworthy that qualitative research methodologies are predominantly utilised in

the study of SWM, despite its intricate and multifaceted nature. The aforementioned
inclination could be perceived as a response to the imperative requirement for
comprehensive and nuanced exploration of solid waste management (SWM) issues
(Yin, 2018). Nevertheless, the dearth of quantitative and mixed-methods research
gives rise to apprehensions. The significance of qualitative research cannot be
overstated; however, it is imperative to acknowledge that an inadequate
representation of quantitative studies may lead to missed prospects for validating
findings and generating more resilient outcomes (Schenck et al., 2022).
5.3 Conclusion
In conclusion, the comprehensive analysis of prevailing trends, methodologies, and

breakthroughs in the realm of sustainable waste management strategies in South
Africa during the period spanning from 2018 to 2022 has unveiled a multitude of
noteworthy facets. First and foremost, it is evident that South Africa is making
significant progress in the implementation of sustainable waste management
practises in recent years. Based on the findings of the study conducted by Nikiema
and Asiedu (2022), it is evident that the nation is undergoing a notable shift towards
embracing the tenets of the circular economy. The focal point of this transition lies
predominantly on the mitigation of waste, the practise of recycling, and the retrieval
of valuable resources.
Furthermore, the research findings are of the paramount importance of engaging in

collaborative efforts with relevant stakeholders to achieve optimal outcomes in the
realm of sustainable waste management. The research conducted by Maalouf and
Agamuthu (2023) highlights the significance of collaborative efforts among
government agencies, private sector organisations, academic institutions, and local
44
communities in driving the transition towards sustainable waste management

practises within the context of South Africa. Partnerships and knowledge-sharing
platforms have emerged as pivotal mechanisms in fostering innovative solutions and
addressing the complex issues pertaining to waste management within our nation.
Furthermore, it is of utmost significance to recognise that the patterns and

revelations identified in the sustainable waste management strategies of South
Africa are in alignment with global initiatives aimed at promoting environmental
sustainability. Based on the research conducted by Gupta et al. (2022) and Chen et
al. (2022), it has been determined that the strategies and best practises observed in
South Africa are in accordance with internationally recognised standards and
guidelines. The aforementioned evidence underscores the transferability of the
knowledge acquired and the favourable outcomes attained during our endeavours in
South Africa, rendering them invaluable for nations grappling with analogous
challenges in waste management.
5.4 Recommendations
The review has highlighted the efficacy of various technologies, such as anaerobic
digestion, composting, and waste-to-energy systems, in achieving favourable results
in waste diversion and resource recovery. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to
undertake further research to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of these
technologies within the unique framework of South Africa. Furthermore, it is of
utmost importance for research endeavours to prioritise the thorough investigation of
potential synergistic interactions among these cutting-edge technologies, with the
ultimate goal of enhancing the overall efficacy and effectiveness of waste
management practises.
The study yielded valuable insights pertaining to the research practises, thematic
priorities, and methodological approaches employed by scholars investigating the
subject of solid waste management (SWM). However, it has also identified novel
avenues for potential exploration, which may facilitate advancements within the
discipline. In order to commence, it is imperative to undertake thorough research
with the objective of establishing a connection between prevailing academic trends
and their pragmatic implementation within the realm of solid waste management
(SWM). Despite the increasing adoption of sustainable and circular methodologies
45
within academic circles, this study reveals a lack of consistent implementation of

these techniques in real-world scenarios. In the foreseeable future, it would be
intellectually stimulating to undertake a comprehensive investigation into the
intricacies surrounding the implementation of sustainable and circular methodologies
in the realm of solid waste management (SWM). In addition, it is imperative to
generate novel and ground breaking concepts in order to effectively address these
challenges proactively.
Within the realm of solid waste management (SWM) research, there has been a
notable shift in emphasis towards waste reduction, recycling, and composting, as
evidenced by the data presented in Table 2. Nevertheless, it is imperative to
acknowledge that there remains ample scope for additional investigation within this
particular domain. Potential avenues for future research may encompass the
exploration of relatively unexplored domains, specifically the comprehensive
investigation of the climate ramifications associated with solid waste management
(SWM). Understanding the environmental impacts associated with various solid
waste management practises is of utmost significance, particularly in light of the
prevailing global warming and climate change concerns.
Enhancing the policy and regulatory framework in South Africa is of paramount

importance for the promotion of sustainable waste management practises. The
realisation of this objective can be achieved through the implementation of legislative
modifications to existing frameworks, namely the National Environmental
Management Act (NEMA) and the National Waste Management Strategy (NWMS).
In order to enhance the efficacy of waste reduction initiatives, foster recycling
practises, and optimise resource recovery, it is imperative to incorporate a more
comprehensive framework encompassing specific and well-defined goals and
corresponding deadlines. Establishing robust mechanisms for enforcing rules and
ensuring compliance among individuals is of utmost significance. Furthermore, it is
imperative to establish appropriate repercussions for individuals who fail to adhere to
the prescribed guidelines. By maintaining vigilant oversight of waste management
regulations and ensuring their strict adherence, industries can effectively adhere to
established guidelines and foster a culture of responsible waste management
practises.
46
Advocating for the adoption of sustainable waste treatment technologies, such as

anaerobic digestion and waste-to-energy conversion, presents a promising avenue
for mitigating our reliance on conventional landfill practises. The utilisation of these
innovative technologies demonstrates their capacity to efficiently harness energy and
extract valuable resources from waste materials. This commendable approach
contributes to the establishment of a circular economy, thereby mitigating
environmental harm. By implementing decentralised waste treatment facilities in
diverse geographical areas, we can effectively mitigate the challenges posed by
transportation, thereby reducing both the distances and costs involved. Furthermore,
this methodology effectively mitigates the risk of certain regions becoming
excessively burdened with the task of waste management. The implementation of
decentralisation strategies can offer valuable support in the seamless integration of
innovative technologies tailored to address the distinct waste characteristics and
requirements of diverse regions and communities.
Through the implementation of comprehensive and enduring public awareness

campaigns, leveraging a wide array of media platforms, and fostering strong
collaborations with community leaders, it is possible to proficiently disseminate
knowledge among the general populace regarding the optimal waste management
strategies. This comprehensive discourse would encompass a range of pertinent
subjects, including waste segregation, the principles and practises of recycling, and
the profound importance of mitigating waste generation. Engaging local communities
in waste management endeavours, such as orchestrating community-wide clean-up
events and implementing comprehensive waste separation programmes, fosters a
sense of ownership and accountability. The promotion and facilitation of waste
management cooperatives can serve as a catalyst for empowering local
communities to actively participate in the commendable endeavour of waste
reduction and recycling.
It is imperative to prioritise future research efforts towards a comprehensive

examination of the potential impact of public education and awareness campaigns
on fostering the widespread adoption of sustainable waste management practises.
The literature review revealed a paucity of research studies that specifically
examined the educational and awareness aspects of waste management. Therefore,
it is crucial for future research endeavours to thoroughly investigate the effectiveness
47
of educational interventions and awareness campaigns in modifying waste

generation behaviours, promoting recycling and waste reduction practises, and
fostering a sustainable mindset among the broader populace.
Furthermore, it has come to our attention that there exists a dearth of scholarly
investigations pertaining to the impact of waste management strategies on the
natural environment. While some studies have examined the environmental efficacy
of specific waste management strategies, it is imperative to undertake more
comprehensive evaluations that encompass the entire life cycle of waste
management systems. In the foreseeable future, it would be highly intriguing if
scholars were able to employ life cycle assessment methodologies to quantitatively
evaluate the environmental ramifications associated with diverse waste management
strategies, thereby facilitating a comprehensive understanding of their sustainability
vis-à-vis one another.
48
REFERENCES
Abass, K., Oasim, M. Z., Song, H., & Murshed, M. (2022). Sustainable Food Waste
Management: A Review. In Sustainable Solid Waste Management (pp. 111-140).
Springer.
Ali, S. A. and Parvin, F. (2022). Examining challenges and multi-strategic

approaches in waste management during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic
review. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular
Economy, 40(9), 1356–1380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x221079303.
Bottero, M., Comino, E. and Riggio, V. (2018). Decision making for sustainable
energy planning: A multicriteria approach. Renewable Energy, 119, 290-300.
Da Silva, C. M., Useche, P. and Menezes, R. (2018). The Influence of Psychological

Factors on High-School Students' Use of Texting Applications on Mobile Phones: An
Empirical Investigation in Brazil. Journal of Business Research, 94, 55-66.
Gupta, J., Kumari, M., Mishra, A., Akram, M., & Thakur, I. S. (2022). Sustainable
Solid Waste Management: A Review. In Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design
(pp. 35-59). Springer.
Imwene, K. O., Ngumba, E., & Kairigo, P. K. (2022). Informal Waste Recycling: A
Review. In Sustainable Solid Waste Management (pp. 203-234). Springer.
Kumar, S. and Smith, S. R. (2019). Challenges and opportunities associated with

waste management in India. Royal Society open science, 4(3), 160764.
Laudal, T. (2018). An attempt to determine the CSR potential of the international

clothing business. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 327-347.
Lombardi, R. and Wackermann, V. (2019). The public perspective on circular

economy strategies: A systematic literature review. Sustainable Production and
Consumption, 19, 74-87.
Mahesh, N., Balakumar, S., & Danhya, U. (2022). Waste-to-Energy Technologies: A

Review. In Sustainable Solid Waste Management (pp. 53-86). Springer.
49
Makanda, K., Nzama, S., & Kanyerere, T. (2022). Sustainable Solid Waste
Management in Informal Settlements: A Review. In Sustainable Solid Waste
Management (pp. 257-278). Springer.
Muralidharan, E. and Shekhawat, L. S. (2020). Circular economy indicators: An

approach to measure circular economy performance. Journal of Cleaner Production,
251, 119616.
Nakin, M., Kabiti, H., Ndhleve, S. and Tsheleza, V. (2022). Household solid waste
quantification, characterization and management practices in Mthatha city, South
Africa. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management, 1(1), 1.
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijewm.2022.10035404.
Nikiema, J., & Asiedu, Z. (2022). Sustainable Solid Waste Management in

Developed and Developing Countries: A Review. In Sustainable Solid Waste
Nyathi, S. and Olowoyo, J. (2022). Leachate Analysis of Two Waste Dumpsites in

Pretoria, South Africa. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management,
1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijewm.2022.10042518.
Olakunle, O. O., Adeodu, A. O. and Joel, O. S. (2018). Waste Management towards

Sustainable Development in Nigeria: A Case Study of Lagos State. International
Journal of Sustainable Development & World Policy, 7(2), 43-57.
Padmanabhan, G. and Ramakrishnan, K. (2019). Sustainable management of

electronic waste: A growing global challenge. Journal of Environmental
Management, 232, 231-240.
References:
Roser, M., Ritchie, H. and Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2020). World Population Growth. Our
World in Data.
Sathya, K., Nagarajan, K., Carlin Geor Malar, G., & Kairigo, P. K. (2022). Integrated
Solid Waste Management for Sustainable Development: A Review. Environmental
and Regulatory Aspects of Solid Waste Management in South Africa, 91-110.
Schenck, R., Blaauw, D. and Nell, C. (2022). Waste management in rural South
Africa perspectives from Manfred Max-Neef’s human scale development framework.
50
International Journal of Sustainable Development, 25(1/2), 30.

https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsd.2022.126465.
Schenck, R., Nell, C. and Blaauw, D. (2022). Waste management in rural South
Africa perspectives from Manfred Max-Neef’s human scale development framework.
International Journal of Sustainable Development, 25(1/2), 30.
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsd.2022.10051423.
Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range

Planning, 51(1), 40-49.
Vatin, N. I., Mohammed, A. M., Deifalla, A. F., & Ngumba, E. (2022). Sustainable
Solid Waste Management in Africa: A Review. In Sustainable Solid Waste
Weiland, L., Law, C. and Sunjka, B. (2020). Ensuring sustainable and resilient air
traffic management systems for South Africa with complexity and whole-of-society
theory approaches. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 31(3).
https://doi.org/10.7166/31-3-2424.
51

Assignment 6 Titi

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Assignment 6 Titi

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HRENV80 ASSIGNMENT 5 STUDENT NUMBER: 42611 482 UNIQUE NUMBER: 313169

Topic Number: 313169

Student Number: 42611482

Email Address: 42611482@mylife.unisa.ac.za

Cell phone Number: 0647513699

Due Date: 28/07/2023

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION.............................................................................5

1.2 Motivation of the Study......................................................................................6

1.3 Problem of study................................................................................................6

1.4 Research aim.................................................................................................... 7

1.5 Research objectives..........................................................................................7

1.6 Research questions...........................................................................................7

CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW..................................................................9

2.2 Theoretical framework.......................................................................................9

2.3 Past relevant studies.......................................................................................10

CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY.........................13

3.1 Research design..............................................................................................13

3.2 Research method............................................................................................ 13

CHAPTER FOUR: FINDINGS, DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS...............16

4.2 Data presentation and findings........................................................................16

4.2.1 Waste hierarchy (2018-2022)....................................................................17

4.2.2 Waste to energy conversion (2018-2022).................................................18

4.2.3 AI and Machine Learning for SWM (2018-2022).......................................18

4.2.4 Specific Focus Areas in SWM (2018-2022)..............................................19

4.2.5 Research Trends in SWM (2018-2022)....................................................20

4.3 Data Analysis...................................................................................................21

4.3.1 Analysis of waste hierarchy (2018-2022)..................................................23

4.3.2 Analysis of waste to energy conversion....................................................24

4.3.3 Analysis of AI and machine learning in SWM...........................................24

2.3.4 Analysis of Research Methods in SWM (2018-2022)................................25

CHAPTER FIVE: SYNTHESIS, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION AND

The effective management of waste has become a critical environmental concern in

sustainable methods and considering the social, economic, and environmental

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION

The management of waste has emerged as a critical global concern necessitating

Waste management has garnered considerable global attention owing to its

Shifting our attention towards the national landscape, it is imperative to acknowledge

1.2 Motivation of the Study

1.3 Problem of study

1.4 Research aim

1.5 Research objectives

i. To identify the key trends in sustainable waste management approaches

1.6 Research questions

i. What are the major trends observed in sustainable waste management

1.7 Study area

CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW

The effective management of waste poses a pressing concern in the context of

2.2 Theoretical framework

Sustainable waste management strategies are firmly rooted in the fundamental

The utilisation of a systems thinking framework enables us to comprehend waste

 Policy and Governance:

The establishment of an efficient waste management system necessitates the

This study endeavours to offer a comprehensive comprehension of the trends,

approaches in South Africa from 2018 to 2022. To achieve this objective, a

2.3 Past relevant studies

In their seminal study, Sathya, Nagarajan, and Malar (2022) undertook a

The literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the prominent patterns,

2.4 Trends in SWM approaches

The implementation of sustainable waste management practises plays a pivotal role

waste material segregation and recycling practises. It is quite fascinating, my fellow

Another noteworthy trend observed in the realm of sustainable waste management

Technological advancements have played a pivotal role in facilitating sustainable

Furthermore, it is noteworthy to acknowledge that decentralised waste management

The utilisation of waste as a source of energy has emerged as a viable approach to