You are on page 1of 1

FOOD PARTNER COPY

6 In the event the kitchen audit fails i.e. the A 2 week business improvement plan shall be implemented and the Food Partner shall
cafeteria kitchen scores are below 65%. have to incorporate the changes suggested by HungerBox. In the event, the kitchen
rating does not improve, HungerBox shall be entitled to terminate SOW at its sole
discretion.

7 Rating below 3.8 in a month- more than 60% A 2 week business improvement plan shall be implemented and the Food Partner shall
of the time, subject to the rating being given have to incorporate the changes suggested by HungerBox. In the event, the kitchen
by a cross section of employees and not only rating does not improve, HungerBox shall be entitled to terminate SOW at its sole
one set of employees. discretion.

8 In the event the menu is not as per a) First Instance - Warning


specifications b) Second Instance – Warning
c) After Third Instance – The Food Partner shall be liable to pay Rs. 5000 for
each instance as and by way of liquidated damages and not by way of
penalty for each instance.
9 In the event compliance documents not up to a) You shall be obligated to provide these documents within 7 days. Pursuant
date pursuant to audit by HungerBox/Client to which, the SOW may be terminated.

10 In the event background verification reports You shall be obligated to provide these documents within 7 days. Pursuant to which,
and medical reports of personnel are not SOW may be terminated.
available or up to date pursuant to audit of
HungerBox

11 In the event Food Partner staff is involved in Termination of SOW immediately


moral turpitude, improper behavior, violent
or insolent acts, causing willful damage, etc.
during the course of providing Services.

12 Misconduct which shall include but not be a) First Instance - Handover of the concerned personnel to the Client’s
limited to: (a) theft, damage, or unauthorized corporate security and prohibit the concerned personnel from operating in
possession or unauthorized use of Client/ the Premises.
HungerBox property/systems; (b) theft, b) Second instance – Termination of SOW without notice.
damage, or unauthorized possession or Notwithstanding the above, the Food Partner shall be liable for any claims arising
unauthorized use of property. therefrom.

13 Use of or in possession of alcohol, arms, a) In case of use or possession of alcohol, the Food Partner shall prohibit the
ammunition concerned personnel from operating at the Premises.
b) In case of possession or use of arms/ ammunition, the SOW shall be
terminated without notice and Food Partner will be blacklisted.
14 Non Adherence of HB Operations Checklist a) First Instance - Warning
b) Second Instance – Warning
• A rating of 2 and below would be c) After Third Instance – The Food Partner shall be liable to pay Rs. 5000 for
non adherence each instance as and by way of liquidated damages.
• ‘No’ comment would be non
adherence
15 In the event cash is received/accepted by the The Food Partner shall be liable to pay the following amounts as and by way of
Food Partner where cash is not a permitted liquidated damages and not by way of penalty:
mode of transaction.
a) First Instance- INR 5,000
b) Second Instance – INR 10,000 or 10% of daily sales (whichever is higher)
c) Third Instance – Termination of SOW
However, the Parties agree that the SOW shall not stand terminated in the event such
aforementioned cash receipt is due to an error in the HungerBox’s POS and order
placement mechanism. Food Partner agrees in case of such an error in the
HungerBox’s POS and order placement mechanism, the Food Partner shall promptly
inform the site manager present at the site. In the absence of a site manager in the
above scenario, the Food Partner shall submit a detailed written report of the incident
to HungerBox, which will be further scrutinized.

16 In case of rejection of HungerBox application On scrutiny by HungerBox, the SOW will be terminated in the first instance itself.
orders on deliberation
However, Parties agree that the SOW shall not stand terminated in the event such
aforementioned rejection is due to a reason beyond the reasonable control of the Food
Partner and/or if there is an error in the Hunger Box’s POS and order placement
mechanism. The Food Partner agrees in case of such an error in the Hunger Box’s POS
and order placement mechanism, the Food Partner shall promptly inform HungerBox’s
site manager present at the site. In the absence of a site manager in the above

You might also like