DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

MINDANAO INCLUSIVE AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROFILE
1st Quarter (January to March 2024)
Name: JIMS KIRBY S. SERDONCILLO
Position: GIS Officer
CORE TARGETS SPECIFIC OUTPUTS Indicators Relative Relative Quantity Quality Timeliness RATING (Point Score)
Weight Weight (%) Target Actual Target Actual Target actual (Refer to attached
(%) 4th Quarter Mechanics of Rating)

1 30% 30% 8 5 8 8 8 7 4 8 6 6.00 1.80

Geographical Data Request and Compilation
Request and acquisition of data related to target Ancestral
Domains specially updated Ancestral Boundaries, Municipal Eight (8) sets of data were
Boundaries, Hazard Maps, Zoning Maps (alienable and completely requested and
disposable areas), existing crop production maps, forest areas, compiled within this quarter
protected areas, and updated road maps.

2 30% 30% 8 4 8 8 8 7 2 8 6 5.33 1.60

Provide Suitability Maps, Hazard Maps to be used in
Map Generation of requested and available preparatory activities, and provide other Miscellanous maps as Six (6) sets of initial maps were
data requested by components 1-4 under MIADP generated within this quarter

2 20% 20% 8 4 8 8 8 8 2 8 8 6.00 1.20

Attendance to Training/Orientation on AGT Tools Application One (1) PSO activity and one (1)
Participation on RPCO (BARMM) and PSO to be conducted by PSO Mindanao and Applied Geotagging RPCO activity were completely
GGU orientation and training activities Tools Mainstreaming by RPCO-BARMM facilitated within this quarter

3 20% 20% 8 6 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 6.67 1.33

Assist in the pre-entry activities of MIADP RPCO XII specifically
the conduct of regional launching, consultation activities, and Two (2) pre-entry activities were
Support on MIADP Activities formulation of LPMIU with LGUs and IPOs on project successfully conducted
counterparts

4
Subtotal 100% 100% 32 19 32 32 32 30 12 32 28 24 6
TOTAL 100% 100% 32 19 32 32 32 30 12 32 28 24 7.27
Total Equivalent Point Score (EPS) 7.27
Prepared by: Recommending Approval Approved By: Weighted Average Score (WAS), multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation (60%) 4.4
Legend:

Name: JIMS KIRBY S. SERDONCILLO MARIA CECILIA E. FRANDO JOHN B. PASCUAL, DVM QN - Quantity
Position: GIS Officer Deputy Project Director Project Director QL - Quality
Office of the Deputy Project Director TL - Timeline
APS - Average Point Score (QN+QL+TL divided by 3)
EPS - Equivalent Point Score (APS multiplied by sub-weight)
PART II. BEHAVIORAL DIMENSIONS (40%)

CRITICAL FACTORS RATING RATING SCALE

EQUIVALENT
Polite, kind and thoughtful behavior in manner of speech and OVERALL POINT EQUIVALENT
1. COURTESY 8 NUMERICAL
actions. SCORE ADJECTIVAL RATING
RATING

Integrates concern for people at work, office clientele, and

2. HUMAN RELATIONS 8 9.1 - 10.0 10 EXCELLENT
supervisor-subordinate relationship into work situation.

Observes behavior of coming to the office on time or to be present

3. PUNCTUALITY & ATTENDANCE 8 7.1 - 9.0 8 ABOVE AVERAGE
at work to complete assigned responsibilities.

Starts action, projects and performs assigned tasks without being

4. INITIATIVE 8 5.1 - 7.0 6 AVERAGE
told and under minimal supervision.

5. STRESS TOLERANCE Stability of performance under pressure or opposition. 8 3.1 - 5.0 4 BELOW AVERAGE

The manner of guiding, influencing, motivating and developing

6. LEADERSHIP (for supervisors only)
confidence of subordinates and partners to work as a team and
8 2.0 - 3.0 2 POOR
accomplish tasks, leading the organizational unit to achieve its
goals and objectives enthusiastically.

Ability to identify and analyze problems then develop alternative

7. JUDGMENT/DECISION-MAKING
solutions to problems, evaluate fact or courses of actions, and
(for supervisors only)
reach sound decision and readiness to take action or commit
oneself.
Total Point Score 48 Discussed Rating with:
Average Point Score (total point score divided by total number of factors involved) 9.60
Equivalent Point Score (APS multiplied by 40%) 3.84
Overall Point Score (WAS of Part I & EPS of Part II) 8.20

Equivalent Numerical Rating JIMS KIRBY S. SERDONCILLO

Equivalent Adjectival Rating GIS Officer
(Immediate supervisor / rater is required to give comments below if
COMMENTS:

MARIA CECILIA E. FRANDO

Deputy Project Director

JOHN B. PASCUAL, DVM

Regional Project Director
PART III. SUMMARY REVIEW OF RATEE'S PERFORMANCE

1. List down employee's key strengths that had contributed to the successful accomplishment 4. Does the employee appear to have strong potentials to assume heavier responsibilities
of his/her major assignments. at this point of time? Why and what particular higher position/function you might
recommend for him/her?

MARIA CECILIA E. FRANDO

2. Employee's performance shortfalls or the specific areas in which he/she needs to improve are: Deputy Project Director
(Immediate Supervisor)

EMPLOYEE'S COMMENTS:
(Ratee is required to give comments regarding his/her overall performance evaluation.
He/she is likewise encouraged to add certain insights/points that his/her immediate
supervisor failed to include or discuss about.)

3. What training programs / key development plans you believe the employee should undergo to
improve his/her performance or hasten his/her professional growth?

JIMS KIRBY S. SERDONCILLO

GIS Officer
 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
MINDANAO INCLUSIVE AGRICULTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROFILE
4th Quarter (November- December 2024)
Name: Adam Ibrahim A. Canape
Position: Media Production Officer

CORE TARGETS SPECIFIC OUTPUTS Indicators Relative Relative Quantity Quality Timelines RATING (Point Score)
Weight Weight (%) Target Actual Target Actual Target actual (Refer to attached Mechanics of Rating)
(%) 4th Quarter

1 Develop visual creative work plan on overall workplan Number of workplan created 10% 1 - 1 - 1 - 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
communications plan of MIADP
2 Draft and finalize layouts of info-advocacy news ads, newsletters, brochures, pamphlets, tarpaulins Number of materials 15% 5 - 5 - 5 - 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
materials
3 Design and install photo and product exhibits, backdrops, standees, streamers, audio/video presentations, Number of events/activities 15% 2 2 2
backdrops, billboards, streamers set/venue design
4 Document MIADP activities and organize files audio/photo/video recording and documentation, Number of activities documented 40% 2 2 2 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
for release on various communication edited/prepared media files Number of media prepared/edited
channels
5 Create presentation slideshows for events powerpoint presentations, PDFS and other formats Number of presentation material 20% 2 2 2 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
such as trainings, coordinative meetings and edited/prepared
others need by the project
6 100 100 100 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Subtotal 100% 102 102 102 - - - - 0.0
TOTAL 100% 102 102 102 - - - - 0.00
Total Equivalent Point Score (EPS) 0.00
Prepared by: Noted by: Recommending Approval Approved By: Weighted Average Score (WAS), multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation (60%) 0.0
Legend:

Name MARIA CECILIA E. FRANDO JOHN B. PASCUAL QN - Quantity

Positiom Component Head Deputy Project Director Project Director QL - Quality
Component TL - Timeline
APS - Average Point Score (QN+QL+TL divided by 3)
EPS - Equivalent Point Score (APS multiplied by sub-weight)