Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ai Pham MD
Ai Pham MD
Ai Vinh Pham Le
Kaunas, 2021
Abstract
This thesis examined and presented the relationship between code-switching and rap
community membership in the Rap Viet TV show from the sociolinguistic perspective.
The language practice encompassed verbal speech and code-switching between English
and Vietnamese. By employing both intra- and inter-sentential code-switching within
their turn, conversational participants were able to create their multiple authentic stances
while communicating their message. Language choice of rap artists and hip-hoppers as
animators represented their belief and allowed them to claim their group membership.
Via constant engaging in code-switching practices, members of Vietnamese rap
community conventionalized its use, hence, code-switching as a practice became a
marker of stance associated with this particular community of practice. The in-group
signaling contextualized their stances as characteristics of group solidarity, projecting
group memberships and specific social identity for the authors of the stances. The
universal code of English was the main resource for constructing “glocal” hip-hop
identities of hip-hoppers. Hip-hop artists paid much attention to adopt linguistic patterns
of African American English to construct and maintain the sense of shared community.
The authentic ideology intertwined the meaning of global hip-hop culture and local
culture language ideology in their speech. It left evidence for the co-authorship and co-
construction acts between hip-hop artists and the urban youth community.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 2
2. Globalization, the role of English and emergence of hip-hop culture in Vietnam: An
overview ................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 English as a foreign language in Vietnam ........................................................ 4
2.2 English-Vietnamese code-switching ................................................................. 6
2.3 Hip-hop subculture in Vietnam ......................................................................... 7
3. Theoretical approach ................................................................................................ 9
3.1 Defining code-switching: models, approaches and perspectives ...................... 9
3.1.1 Social factors focus (social function of code choice) ............................ 10
3.1.2 Conversation analysis and pragmatic movements of code-switching ... 11
3.2 Code-switching in rap music .......................................................................... 12
3.3 The language of hip-hop ................................................................................. 13
3.4 Stance .............................................................................................................. 18
4. Methodology .......................................................................................................... 21
4.1 Methodological approach................................................................................ 21
4.2 Data description and data collection ............................................................... 22
4.3 Data analysis ................................................................................................... 23
5. Findings .................................................................................................................. 25
5.1 Formal and structural characteristics of code-switching in Rap Viet show.... 25
5.2 Code-switching as a marker of stance ............................................................ 26
5.3 Code-switching as stancetaking act ................................................................ 26
5.3.1 Code-switching as positioning strategy ................................................. 27
5.3.2 Code-switching as evaluation strategy .................................................. 30
5.3.3 Code-switching as disalignment strategy .............................................. 31
5.4 Stances relating to hip hop identity ................................................................. 33
5.4.1 Code-switching as a marker of keepin’ it real stances .......................... 33
5.4.2 Code-switching as a marker of giving props/respect stances ................ 39
5.4.3 Code-switching as a marker of gangsta stances .................................... 46
6. Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 55
7. References .............................................................................................................. 58
Appendices
List of Abbreviations
16T 16Typh
AAE African American English
AFTA The Association of Southeast Asian Nations Free Trade Area
APEC The Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum
BZ BinZ
CS Code-switching
CA Conversation analysis
GD GDucky
GZ Gonzo
KR Karik
JT JustaTee
RO set The set of rights and obligations
RM Rhymastic
SB Suboi
TL TLinh
TRPs Turn transition-relevance places
TT Tran Thanh
WW Wowy
WTO The World Trade Organization
YunoBB Yuno Bigboi
2
1. Introduction
Hip-hop in general or rapping in particular blossomed in the late 1970s in New
York. The term hip-hop referred to the urban youth culture as a cultural production of
graffiti art, slang rapping, break dancing, styles of dress, love of basketball in America.
Originally, the term rap was credited by African American community and alluded to
romantic, sexualized interaction within their speech (Smitherman, 1997). Later on, when
it was spread to the public language in the late 1960s, its meaning was transformed to
“strong, aggressive, highly influential and powerful talk” (Smitherman, 1997: 4). From
the late 1980s, through the history of hip-hop culture development, the presence of hip-
hop culture has left significant sense as an important part in urban African American
culture (Morgan, 2001). Nonetheless, this hip-hop has involved not only the black
underclass youth or minority groups as a New York City phenomenon but also gained its
impact as a cultural movement from the United States to other youth groups around the
world (McGregor, 1998).
This movement under the lens of global linguistic flows was conceived as
“universal language” or ‘global idiom’ (Mitchell, 2011: 12 & 21). The global spread and
local appropriation of hip-hop culture, from Shanghai to Nairobi and São Paulo, hip-hop
was evolving into a global art of communication. The articulated hip-hop discourse of
glocalization has been documented from research outside the United States concerning
how ‘its various local articulations depart from the “original” in significant ways – in rap
music, for example, in terms of language choice, song topics, cultural references, and
sampling practices.” (Androutsopoulos, 2009). Hip-hop culture was introduced to
Vietnamese culture as the influences of foreign culture, the result of globalized economic
process, and the cultural interaction with American Vietnamese after two decades of
independence. Rapping penetrated the hip-hop subculture to the ground of traditional
music by the song “Vietnamese gang” (Thai Minh Ngo and Khanh Nho, 1997), published
in 1997 by American-Vietnamese rappers (Doan, 2018).
Sociolinguistic works centralized rap and hip-hop music as a “source for new
trends of discourse and as a frame for the interpretation of local events and productions”
(Androutsopoulos, 2009: 43-44). Pennycook (2003) argues that the use of English outside
North America was an expression of subculture identity and style. From the notion of
3
of English language used in daily life of Vietnamese has made impressive progress since
the beginning of the twentieth-first century. English is no longer a strange thing in daily
life – it has spread from the street to academia, from the far north mountainous areas to
the heart of modernized urban areas (Tran, 2017).
English usage is spreading from bustling cities to rural provinces in Vietnam, as
reflected in its “linguistic landscape” (cf. Gorter 2009), from advertising boards to shop
signs. The high demand for learning English raised many types of English classes all over
the country. Besides classes at school or university, students’ parents or learners have a
vast choice to improve their English level in the mushrooming era of language centers
and their English training courses. English is widely applied as a means of communication
not only between foreigners and foreigners, or Vietnamese and English-speaking
foreigners, but also between Vietnamese and Vietnamese in all contexts.
2.2 English-Vietnamese Code-Switching
Ho (2003) researched the Vietnamese-English code-switching forms in Australia
and the behavior of Vietnamese bilinguals, from the perspective of social and cultural
influence. He proved that the practices of intra- and inter-sentential CS are an integral
part of their lives. Data in his research revealed that the patterns of CS are affected by
various aspects of the Vietnamese linguistic and cultural features.
In Vietnam, as a result of second language teaching and economic demands for
English, young Vietnamese people in urban areas code-switch between Vietnamese and
English. Nguyen (2012) became aware that Vietnamese bilinguals tend to use inter-
sentential 66.7% more than intra-sentential CS. There was no evidence that the grammar
structure of English and Vietnamese interact with each other (Nguyen, 2012). In tertiary
educational context, Nguyen (2014) reconfirms that the frequency of inter-sentential is
more than intra-sentential CS. Moreover, the type of school (e.g private vs. public) seems
to affect the frequency of CS among children: students in public schools employ CS more
than in private schools. A number of factors trigger CS at schools, such as the in-class
budget, the students’ English levels, cultural factors, teacher evaluation systems, and the
teachers’ cognition. A pedagogical focus of CS in Vietnamese university EFL teachers’
classroom instruction by Grant & Nguyen (2017). Their study shows that CS is more
commonly practiced in English instruction classes selectively and deliberately. The
practice of teachers using signals that contain both instructional and social functions, due
7
to their lack of motivation to speak English in the classroom and the proficient level of
their students, partially explains that employing CS is not an automatic habit among
Vietnamese bilingual teachers.
The significant role of English in Vietnam as an international language is proven
by the way that the Vietnamese employ it in both written and spoken forms. English has
a remarkable influence on Vietnamese cultural and social factors, penetrating the
Vietnamese language which is revealed in English code-mixing in the online newspaper
VNExpress (Dao, 2019). A study by Le (2017) found that bilingual students practice inter-
sentential CS more often than intra-sentential one in digital platforms. The purpose of the
students' practice aims to switch for availability, formulate expression, respond to
previous language choice, and alteration of tone, moods, or feelings persistently and
naturally. On the cyber platforms, depending on the interactional needs of speakers, the
process of CS is flexibly customized. The act of mixing English as an alternative
language, used by Vietnamese has been employed widely in various domains of the
society, from outside Vietnam to the educational settings, public spheres, and cyber
platforms.
2.3 Hip-hop subculture in Vietnam
English is not the only influence from the capitalism embracement act of the
Vietnam Government at the end of the twentieth century and beginning of the twenty-
first century. So does popular culture, as part of the economic globalized process from
numerous foreign cultures leaves influences on the music and musical taste of many
urbanized Vietnamese youth, especially in the key economic regions like Saigon and
Hanoi. In Vietnam, the product of globalization includes Western homogenization and
the destruction of local traditions is called Vietnamization, which is “apparent within the
right side of the Arc of Culturation” (Olsen, 2008: 23). Vietnamization is the outcome of
people's demand after years of reconciliation between the North and the South Vietnam.
As Onishi (1998: 483) defines “As globalization proceeds, repertoires become unified,
and people need something new. Thus, local music culture is a good spice with which to
revitalize the global music scene”. The intertwinement of economic development and
Western culture influences as globalized realities has blurred the post-war consciousness
among Vietnamese youth. The subculture in Vietnam can be identified as a subdivision
8
between generations, especially preteen or/and young adults with their parents/older
generations.
Another factor that needed to be mentioned is ‘Viet Kieu’ (Vietnamese who have
left their homeland to live in another country) who contribute their performance to the
(new) local music flow. After the post-war immigrant flow to the US, they have returned
to Vietnam, united themselves with family and friends, and brought back the Western
culture tastes. Specifically in rap music, the new generation of Vietnamese living in the
US has adapted to the American rap subculture and emerged from the Vietnam rap culture
on the internet initially. Vietnamese Rap music has a unique origin, nurtured mostly from
the Vietnam war on American soil, and originated overseas by American-Vietnamese.
Rapper Thai Minh Ngo and rapper Khanh Nho (both from Portland, Oregon) are
considered the official leaders of Vietnamese rap culture after publishing the song
“Vietnamese Gang” online in 1997. The lyrics of this song featured in both English and
Vietnamese lyrics and caused a wave of excitement throughout the Vietnamese
communities from the US to Vietnam (Stanley, 2016). Their song matched the gangsta
rap style by its backdrop of violence and crime but still embraces the pride in his identity
of being Vietnamese (Straight Outta Saigon, 2016).
In addition to the growing spread of rap, the 1990s also witnessed the emergence
of breakdance culture. It was first known to the public in the form of Michael Jackson's
famed dance routine. Gradually, breakdance attracted attention and fascinated a certain
number of students. At first, only a few groups spontaneously, following some videos
sent back from abroad, or under the guidance of people who have lived abroad have the
opportunity to return home. By 1998, when the Vietnam Government officially opened
the way to the internet with the world, a series of latest and most updated information
about the hip-hop world came to Vietnam (Tran, 2010). At the beginning of the 1990s,
the hip-hop trend not only stopped at the dance segment, but clearly divided into different
small areas: breakdancing, graffiti, rapping, DJing, and MCing. Then the world music
wave with performances of foreign hip-hop singers, such as HOT (Korea), Usher, Lauryn
Hill, and 50 Cent (USA) rushed into Vietnam. These artists have made a strong
impression on the fashion style of many famous Vietnamese singers and young people
also raced to dress in that style (Tran, 2010). Lanca (2008) analyzed how urban youth in
Hanoi shared group interests, group nominative values and showed visual markers as their
9
3. Theoretical approach
3.1 Defining code-switching: models, approaches and perspectives
Code-switching of the speech community has attracted attention from various
scholars in linguistics, sociology, psychology, psycholinguistics, and sociolinguistics. As
both language and social contact phenomenon, CS acted as a reflective and constitutive
tool which represents the social reality and the social processes, where each code got
associated with particular social relationships and ideologies in bilingual situations
(Bailey, 1999). For linguistic anthropology, CS was defined as the basis of co-
membership which is called a language community (Silverstein, 1976). In the linguistic
community, it is a phenomenon of the language of individuals which has long been
investigated within the social context of the community in which it is spoken. From the
very early definition of CS, it has been understood as a speech event when speakers switch
10
between two or more language varieties in the same context over a short period of time
(Labov, 1966: 4). From that initial definition, modern sociolinguists regarded a new field
of language use in a particular human group, so-called interpersonal communication.
Hymes (1974:70) defined CS as “a common term for alternate use of two or more
languages or language varieties or even speech styles”. Appel and Muysken (1987)
documented three types of switching code textually, which determines whether it is: (1.)
tag-switching (emblematic) – involving exclamation; (2.) inter-sentential – changing
varieties simultaneously across sentences or clauses or (3.) intra-sentential – one variety
is alternated by another within one sentence. CS was defined by Hoffmann (1991: 110)
as “the alternative of two languages within the same utterance or during the same
conversation”. Just as important, Trask (1999) pointed out that, CS occurs in
circumstances where speakers changed back and forth between their language varieties,
whether within a single conversation or sometimes in the middle of an utterance (Trask,
1999).
3.1.1 Social factors focus (social function of code choice)
Sociolinguistic perspective has paid attention to the social motivations behind CS,
the impact of social change to linguistic practices of community members. The nature of
social boundaries, social associations of particular codes are functions of specific
histories of social relationships. In the process of interaction, Blom and Gumperz (1972)
study on the social meaning of CS in verbal communication in Norway community,
revealed the overarching (comprehensive) functions of CS of the individual language
choice. Under the lens of grammatical perspective, speakers chose the language varieties
which they wished to convey meaning reasonably. Blom and Gumperz identified two
types of social motivation behind CS practices: situational switching, “alternation
between varieties redefines a situation, being a change in governing norms”; and
metaphorical switching, “alternation enriches a situation, allowing for allusion to more
than one social relationship within the situation” (Blom and Gumperz, 1972: 409).
Hoffman (1991) conveyed the communicative intent of participants with ten reasons (1.)
talking about a particular topic, (2.) quoting somebody else, (3.) being emphatic about
something (express solidarity), (4.) interjection, (5.) Repetition used for clarification, (6.)
intention of clarifying the speech content for the interlocutor, (7.) expressing group
identity, (8.) to soften or strengthen requests or commands, (9.) because of real lexical
11
need, and (10.) to exclude other people when a comment is intended for only a limited
audience. The social forces left many factors that affected the performance of CS of
speakers and carry social meaning under different conversation circumstances.
3.1.2 Conversation analysis and pragmatic movements of Code-switching
Ethnographers of communication have pursued many informative and valuable
information of the social meaning in variable speech events, describing its reasons,
functions, and motivations particularly. Gumperz (1982) investigated the metaphorical or
conversational functions of CS under the ethnic boundaries, values, norms of language
usage in particular settings. He stated six conversational functions of CS: (1.) quotation,
a quote is code-switched; (2.) addressee specification, a code-switched message aims at
a particular/different addressee; (3.) repetition, a code-switched message repeats what has
just been said; (4.) interjection, an interjection is code-switched; (5.) message
qualification, i.e. a code-switched message elaborates what has been said; and (6.) facility
of expression. To interpret those functions, he introduced the marked and unmarked CS
theory by tracing the pattern of linguistic forms and generalizing them to the social
structure/meaning in particular conversational settings. Interlocutors tended to employ
the language code to index their social role, by this way, their identities are negotiated
with other participants within the conversation. The notion of the indexicality and style
projecting by the marked code choice was awarded between interlocutors (interpretation
process) (Gumperz, 1982).
On the conversational dimension of CS, Auer (1984) examined language choice
in spontaneous conversation to pursue its local (situated) interpretation, finding the exact
meaning of function of language alternation. He looked at the transitions from one
language to another in the context sensitive procedures and interpreted the value of the
code which interlocutors chose to reconstruct the conceptions of members. It was “much
more than just “one-to-one” relationship between language choice and situation” (Auer,
1984: 104). Myers-Scotton (1993) pointed out that speakers might choose marked code
for a variety of social reasons: showing deference, anger, solidarity, eloquence, or
distance. Speakers chose the form of conversation contribution and indexed the set of
rights and obligations (RO set) which they wished to be in force between them and their
addresses for the current exchange (Myers-Scotton (1993: 113). Their motivation when
they wished to establish a new RO set in the current speech exchange, marked their code
12
choice as a marked one. The causes of alternation, thereby, were defined depending on
the mutual understanding about the rights and obligations of participants. Of an utterance
(Myers-Scotton,1993: 479), that was, circumstances that “for certain interaction types,
the norm of those having power and prestige – a norm which other groups recognize,
whether they approve of it or not”. Myers-Scotton discussed the function of choice code
as the negotiation of “position” of speakers. She elaborated on the principle of the
markedness theory as
in bilingual and multilingual communities where conversational participants
are competent in the community languages, speakers' choice of language is
determined by their desire to index - i.e. assess or point to” (Myers-Scotton,
1993, as cited in Edwards, 1995: 302).
Participant signaled her/his understanding of the current situation as his/her relevant role
within the context. By using more than one language, speakers may initiate negotiation
over his/her relevant roles. Speakers must share at least some extents, an understanding
of the social meaning of each available code. Speakers made choices with the expectation
that interlocutors will recognize a choice as carrying a particular intention.
Finally, the active construction of position could change the social meanings (i.e.
the current RO set) by their unmarked choice as linguistics choice as link, creating
ambiguity, and ambiguity as confrontational (e.g. the inter-ethnic interaction) (Myers-
Scotton, 1999). Analyzing interlocutors and the purposive behavior under the principle
of the RO set, Myers and Agnes (2001) resumed the rational choice model as the actual
choice of an alternative as unmarked choice was the only choice which is most expected
or the best action. There were three reasons for choice code was raised:
(i) actors consider their desires and values as well as prior beliefs; (ii) they
confirm that these three elements are internally consistent; (iii) finally, they
make sure that their final desires, values, and beliefs take account of available
evidence. Myers and Agnes (2001: 14)
Consequently, CS was marked as mechanism and explanation for their unmarked choice
rationally.
3.2 Code-switching in rap music
Bilingual or multilingual speakers and their language mixing behaviors in song
lyrics or within stanzas have already attracted the attention of sociolinguists and applied
13
(battle, ‘breaking’, ‘deal’, ‘DJ’, ‘chicks’, ‘writer’, ‘wannabe) and CS (English and
Norwegian) between sentences and between parts of texts were employed. The transition
of English to Norwegian in its hip-hop community explained how performers found
themselves as part of hip-hop through Norwegian language. Equally, English has been
claimed as a medium usage of rap by Norwegian performers. As a result, the mixing
codes of English and Norwegian language illustrated how the global and the local were
blending and co-presenting in rap lyrics. Local hip-hoppers and rappers decided for
themselves “what is ‘real’ to text culture norm and attitudes that are indeed global, e.g.,
by recontextualization” (Brunstad, Røyneland & Opsahl, 2010: 249). Hip-hop did not
transport only American culture or global culture, but its development went beyond that
and transformed to the new local forms.
The hip-hop ideology of authenticity – keepin’ it real – in the South Korean hip-
hop community was subscribed by young Koreans. South Korean artists showed their
concerns on local youth identity by staying true as South Korean commentators on their
social issues. Besides, they utilized hip-hop English features in song lyrics and dressing
in hip-hop-style outfits and accessories in their performance. Those factors conveyed
their understanding of hip-hop culture and practiced it. This study indicated that Korean
hip-hop artists were part of the global ideology of authenticity (Lee, 2010).
Akande (2013) proved that Nigerian hip-hop artists employ different language
varieties in their performed rap lyrics. CS between English (dominantly) and other
languages in Nigeria has left evidence about bilingual competence achievement of hip-
hop artists. Their choice of English, especially American slang, showed the strong bound
and influence of this variety to the rap community of Nigeria, and potentially, in terms of
other English varieties, it may enrich the linguistic repertoire of hip-hop fans. (Akande,
2013).
3.3 The language of hip-hop
African American English has remained a strong bound with the language of hip-
hop. The communicative practices of the Hip-Hop Nation were rooted in the African
American speech community, such as tonal semantics, narrativizing, signification,
Africanized syntax, and so on (Smitherman, 1997). The Black oral traditions and
discursive practices of AAE which conveyed the Black struggle for survival during the
history of American slavery: “The rap music of the Hip-Hop Nation simultaneously
15
reflects the cultural evolution of the Black oral tradition and the construction of a
contemporary resistance rhetoric” (Smitherman, 1997:21). He added that the rap
artists/rappers of hip-hop employ “language that people know and understand”
linguistically to testify and to perform the idea of “speak the truth to the people''
(Smitherman, 1997:22). Rap music was the principle medium where African Americans
express their voice and their view for all the world to hear, it has become the norm of the
working class (under conditions of joblessness, poverty, and disempowerment)
(Smitherman, 1997).
Morgan (2001) explored the principles of language practices and the social
organization in African American hip-hop community, providing an insight to the
language ideology of hip-hop of young urban African American. The influence of hip-
hop culture to the language choices of urban youth speech reflected their community
linguistic norms. She stated that
The importance of relationship and performance ties in Hip Hop creates and
reflects a speech community that highlights region, ideology, and language
style. The solidification of the Hip Hop crew as a family/business unit
ushered in an era of artistic and cultural stability in the Hip Hop community
(Morgan, 2001: 193).
The speech style associated with hip-hop was rooted in African American language and
communicative practices. It has been widely spoken and transformed by other hip-hop
communities outside the US. Hip-hop artists paid a great attention to their speech and
considered it as a way to maintain their street credibility as part of their language
ideology. Her conclusion on their language ideology as:
...urban African American life is not simply represented in relation to in-
group intersubjectivities, but through cultural symbols and sounds, especially
linguistic symbols, which signify membership, role, and status so that, as
Rossi-Landi (1983: 49) argues, “words, expressions, messages circulate as
commodities’’. In this respect, the Word in Hip Hop is at once the realization
of Foucault’s The Discourse on Language (1972), Bakhtin’s Dialogic
Imagination (1981), and Labov’s Language in the Inner City (1972).
(Morgan, 2001: 205)
16
The language use of their community represented their urban youth culture and identity,
which indexed their membership and has consequences on the affiliation of other
members such as understanding or realizing the social role or status of sender. The in-
group social identity was projected and created within hip-hop as identity performance –
the semiotic resources such as language styles or gestures, gait, clothing, hairstyles,
accessories was considered as performance of social ‘selves’.
The expression ‘keepin’ it real’ has become practically a mantra in hip-hop and
an indicator of authenticity. It urged individuals to be true to their roots and not to “fronts”
or pretend to be something they are not” (Rickford & Rickford, 2000: 23). Perry (2004:
87) outlined some of the different possible meanings of ‘keepin’ it real’, from
'celebrations of the social effects of urban decay and poverty' to 'assertions of a paranoid
vigilance in protecting one's dignity'. He stated that it was
an 'authenticating device responding to the removal of rap music from the
organic relationship with the communities creating it' and 'an explicitly
ideological stand against selling one's soul to the devils of capitalism or
assimilation' (Perry, 2004; cited by Pennycook, 2006: 99).
Furthermore, Morgan (2005: 212) suggested:
Similarly, the hip-hop mantra "keepin' it real": represents the quest for the
coalescence and interface of ever-shifting art, politics, representation,
performance and individual accountability that reflects all aspects of youth
experience.
Or as statement of Mitchell (2001: 1-2):
Hip-hop and rap cannot be viewed simply as an expression of African-
American culture; it has become a vehicle for global youth affiliations and a
tool for reworking local identity all over the world.
The study of Newman (2005) about language use in hip-hop cyphers (informal gathering
of hip-hoppers) from diverse backgrounds (races, classes, educations, etc.) has pointed
out the role of literacy, which acted as a particular perspective of communicative form.
They inherited this form from the socio-practices and ideologies of their creators –
African-American motifs and culture. Keeping ethnicity was seen as the core hip-hop
value of authenticity:
17
persona was a serious identity in the hip-hop world. On the other hand, her prominence
to white audiences, who were fascinated by African American cultural and linguistic
forms, encouraged the market strategy of whites for commercial hip-hop (Eberhardt &
Freeman, 2015).
3.4 Stance
The notion of stance has become central to sociolinguist studies in recent years (cf.
Jaffe, 2009; Kiesling, 2009; Johnstone, 2009), the term stance has had numerous
definitions from different perspectives. In order to find out what kind of function it served
in a particular context. The stance interpretation on the social and pragmatic nature of
language employed by speakers provided an insight to the broader scope of language use,
interaction and sociocultural field. Stance was a key sociolinguistic phenomenon and a
useful analytical tool (Du Bois, 2007; Jaffe, 2009). It provided a unified framework and
a detailed groundwork for contextualizing and interpreting stance with its various
elements and processes in a dialogic context. The stance was also defined as
a public act by a social actor, achieved dialogically through overt
communicative means (language, gesture, and other symbolic forms),
through which social actors simultaneously evaluate objects, position
subjects (them- selves and others) and align with other subjects, with respect
to any salient dimension of the sociocultural field (Du Bois, 2007: 163).
The primary goals of sociolinguistic approaches to stance should take into consideration
social and historical context when analyzing how a particular stance is taken up.
Goffman (1981) discussed the production format of a discourse, he illustrated
various functions of “speaker” as animator (who produced utterances, author (who
composes utterances), and principle (who commits to utterances). Animator was
distinguished from others functions by the various statuses of a participant so that the
utterance was received differently. Based on this participant framework of Goffman,
stance was not only about a relationship of the animator to the propositions in their talk
and their interlocutor but also an intersubjective, socially constructed activity (Du Bois,
2002). Ochs (1993) mentioned the local conventions linking interlocutors together by
their mediated understanding/sense about relation of language and social identity. She
pointed out that
19
(1.) The indexical link between classroom utterance types and social
positions-identities and hierarchies. (2.) The modeling function of all teacher
discourse. (3.) Audience design: the attribution of audience competencies
and identities through teacher performance. (Jaffe, 2007: 73)
The importance of language alternative in interaction of Gaelic-English bilingual on the
Isles of Skye and Harris was emphasized by Smith-Christmas (2013). Employing CA,
she argued that CS is the most powerful communicative strategy to highlight their
epistemic and effective stance. To achieve a certain goal within talk, they used a specific
code to evoke social and personal identities. The contrastive function of CS between
Gaelic and English provided these bilingual speakers a communicative tool to ensure the
clear meaning while interacting with each other.
The study of Bassiouney (2012) relied on Du Bois (2007) stance triangle focused
to positioning stance as the key angle of stance act in Egyptians community during the
Egyptian revolution. She pointed out that CS was a marked choice of speaker and it was
an act of positioning, carrying a means of identity construction in Egyptian public
discourse of TV media stations. The distinctive indexes of Standard Arabic, Egyptian
Colloquial Arabic and English as linguistic resources allowed speakers to express
themselves with audiences. By switching code, they positioned and situated themselves
relation to their own country, political affiliation and identity, and showed their alignment
or disalignment with a specific target group. The target audiences in performed speech
were defined within that imagined community, where they shared the common idea of
belonging to a collective identity (Anderson, 1983). Bilinguals employed CS in media
discourse, projected their specific local consciousness and authentic local style in order
to achieve greater audiences (Androutsopoulos, 2007). The language choice of rappers in
French allowed them to project their multi-layered identities as the result of language
ideologies of hip-hop artists and youth. French rappers were able “to align themselves
with a diverse immigrant community as it is perceived to be the norm in French hip hop”
(Hassa, 2010: 62) by using various languages in their rap lyrics. Much sociolinguistic
research on stance taking of bilinguals has proved stance takers engaged CS as a social
and local meaning reproduction in their conventional associations. Providing a firm
theory and empirical evidence on the relationship of CS, stance, and identity construction.
21
4. Methodology
This thesis intended to answer the following three questions: (1) How code-
switching practices are employed in Rap Viet Show – a Vietnamese reality TV show for
seeking talented rappers? (2) To what extent is CS employed as a stancetaking practice
in Rap Viet? (3) What kind of communicative and contextual meanings do these practices
encode? In order to understand the language use of hip-hop artists and youth Vietnamese
in public media, the relationship between Vietnamese and English language use needs to
be examined, both of which are popularly used in the urban speech of Vietnam and in
public media.
4.1 Methodological approach
This thesis employs Conversation Analysis (CA) approach to study CS in talk-
interaction. The pragmatic research on CS focused on the conversational functions of CS,
its effects on conversational participants and pragmatic motivations of speakers (Auer,
1984). For a particular situation, depending on extra-linguistic factors (topics, settings,
speaker roles, community norms and values, societal, political, and ideological), speakers
code-switch to convey special community intent.
The meaning of CS must be interpreted with reference to the language choice in
the preceding and following turns by the participants themselves (Wei, 1998). In addition,
it is also important to account for the social and local contexts, as well as the orientation
of bilingual speakers. Therefore, this thesis also employs some conceptual and analytical
tools associated with the markedness model developed by Myers-Scotton (1993).
Conversational participants initiate and negotiate their social roles by choosing a code to
establish a new RO set and to signal his or her understanding of the current situation.
Following the practical pattern of Myers-Scotton, to trace the tendencies of CS in
interaction, whether it appeared in the form of inter-sentential (within a sentence) type or
intra-sentential (across sentences) type. Those types of CS in this investigation were also
examined under CS occurred between utterances/turns and within an utterance. The CA
approach to data of English and Vietnamese codes were employed as a resource for
interpreting the meaning of each code in interaction. In order to find out the situated use
of CS in public media and its discourse-related functions between English and
Vietnamese by turn-by-turn analysis of language choices. Rational choice model helped
to answer the question of why English code was the best action of the participants at
22
his/her turn in conversations happening in the Rap Viet show. It explained the motivation,
intention and desire of those participants on switching codes when it arrived at their local
intentions. In which, it was used as a filter model for the speaker-listener coordination, to
see if a specific code was taken up rationally to construct a social group membership, to
show solidarity or to accommodate their style with the previous turn. Or whether it was
derived from sequential structure as an act of distancing, contrasting or disagreeing. The
unmarked choice of speaker is an output of calculating a potential choice for a specific
interaction type, such as elaboration appraisal, alignment or disalignment with the
previous comments of other coaches/judges. It reflected and identified the speaker's goals,
attitude and belief, authority or interpretation in a giving interaction context. Right and
obligation set was a preferred indicator to process how a speaker used their linguistic
choice to project his/her own persona and social relations with other participants (such as
candidates, the MC, the judges and other coaches).
Hereof, the methodological approach in this investigation was ethnography of
naturally-occurring communication. The analysis of conversational CS in English and
Vietnamese was applied to trace and to identify user-related patterns of language use by
young people in public media – the Rap Viet TV show, such as the CS practices and the
enacted stances of speakers. Within the scope of this investigation, the turn-taking
techniques were employed for naturally occurring speech in hip-hop subculture contexts
in order to interpret their multilayered identities and their discursive positions when they
switch codes.
4.2 Data description and data collection
The data employed in this thesis consists of sixteen pre-recorded videos of the
Rap Viet show 2020 on YouTube. The Rap Viet TV program (2020) is a Vietnamese hip-
hop talent show, which was publicly broadcasted during primetime television (8PM every
Saturday) in Vietnam. The show is produced by Vie Channel (VieChannel, 2020) based
on a Thai show called The Rapper, which premiered in 2018 and was honoured as the
Best General Entertainment Programme at the 23rd Asian Television Awards in 2018.
The full video of the performances of the contestants in the first episode (on August 1st,
2020) of Rap Việt, uploaded on YouTube, has topped 19 million views just two weeks
after it was released. The second episode of Rap Viet, which aired on August 8th, attracted
23
more than 576,000 concurrent viewers (on Aug 12th), a record for a reality TV show in
Việt Nam. (Vietnam News, 2020).
In order to examine the turn taking strategies used among Vietnamese hip-hop
artists and youth, sixteen videos of the Rap Viet TV show were selected for analysis (Vie
Channel - HTV2, 2020). The length of each video was roughly one hour and a half to two
hours. The first video included in the analysis was released on August 01 , 2020, and the
st
latest on November 14 , 2020. The analysis focused only on interactions that contained
th
CS instances. First, I identified all such contexts and then transcribed the interactions
following CA transcription conventions (cf. Clift 2016). Only interactions that contained
CS instances were transcribed according to CA transcription conventions following Clift
(2016) and presented data of tonal language to English-speaking audiences following
Sidnell & Stivers (2013). Songs / performances and their lyrics were excluded from the
analysis, as well as written text that appeared on the screen during the show. Only spoken
interactions were included in the data set. The total amount of analyzed interaction is 214.
4.3 Data analysis
Data analysis focused specifically on the instances of CS, namely, I identified the
types (intra/inter) of CS in both verbal and non-verbal modes. In the context of CS, verbal
and nonverbal activities, function as “contextualization cue” (Gumperz (1982: 131), that
is, as cues that provide “an interpretive framework for the referential content of a
message”. The data was transcribed, and coded according to the following categories:
turn transition places where CS occurred (turn-initial, turn-internal, and turn-final), topic
(topic management & shift) and variety stances of speaker (hip-hop related stances and
the stance triangle).
In my analysis, I paid a special attention to turn transition-relevance places (TRPs)
due to their central role in sequential turn-organization. Sacks, Schegloff & Jefferson
(1974: 715) noted:
That talk can be continuous is provided in the rules by the fact that each option
provides a procedure whereby some next speaker can be located at any
transition relevance place. The exercise of options to talk, in the ordered
fashion in which they become available at each transition-relevance place,
yields a sequence of continuous talk.
24
Turn transition is a social action, underlining the decision and design of speakers between
turns whether turns were overlapped, disrupted, paused, or latched and might pursue topic
shift. Schegloff (1996) labelled stance-taking as a task of TRPs, showing how participants
heard and understood the prior turn (aligning with or against, registering, surprise or
familiarity). Therefore, when transcribing the data, I included such features of
conversation as: verbal feedback (turn-taking), nonverbal feedback (gazes, gestures),
hesitation, overlapping talk, connecting, pauses, self-correct, and interruption (turn
accession). Those features conveyed information about interactional consequences for
interlocutors, signaling how speakers project their stances towards other interlocutors and
to what they are saying.
In addition, there are rhythmic patterns of the preceding turns in conversational
events, which is subjected to accommodation among interlocutors (Auer et al. 1999).
Communication accommodation is a dynamic process in which participants adjust (or
accommodate) their style of speech to one another. Relying on the communicative
behavior of other conversational partners, the message senders try to minimize the social
differences between them and their interactants. This theory provides a mechanistic view
of social interaction, linking the language use, context, and identity of speakers (Giles,
Coupland & Coupland, 1991).
Depending on the resources such as the structural code switches between (as inter-
and intra- sentential switch styles in TRPs), I interpreted the collected data and evaluated
a social and situated meaning in verbal and non-verbal communication of participants.
The understanding of CS as a structural strategy that links to stance-taking in
contextualization cues (Jaffe, 2009). I referred to this theory to find out the
communicative behavior and the motivation when an addresser took up his/her stance and
how this stance was acknowledged by other addresses speakers under specific topics,
conditions and circumstances. The rhythmic patterns of CS between speaker turns were
an indicator to the powerful means of contextualizing information and a scope for the
discussion of their constructed identities.
Vietnamese hip-hop has gained its position in the Vietnamese community, and it
is considered as a cultural rebellion and transformation of the youth movement. This
movement has evolved hip-hop music from a musical genre to a subculture. Hip-hop
music in public media has become a playground for both artists and young Vietnamese
25
to create, express themselves, and use individual stances – not only to share and call for
the alignment of other team members. I argued that in the public domain, stance-takers
of the hip-hop community use their conversation switching style of in-group code for
interacting with their group members. The universal code of hip-hop English was a local
production of urban Vietnamese bilingual speech styles. Their linguistic practices allow
them to recontextualize the global culture of hip-hop and position themselves in the
notion of hip-hop authenticity. Thus, the given attention of public media for Rap Viet,
has provided Vietnamese hip-hop artists and participants a platform for the performers to
signal their glocal identities and to attract youth-cultural communities and audiences.
5. Findings
5.1 Formal and structural characteristics of code-swiching in the Rap Viet show
Participants of Rap Viet show employ both intra-sentential and inter-sentential
CS. Intra-sentential CS mostly are limited to the use of hip-hop-specific nouns or nominal
phrases, for instance, (underground, flow, trap, drill, a million dollar flow, hit maker flow,
old school, new school, etc.), adjectives (matched, international, flashy, rich, gospel,
cool, real, and so on), interjections (Yea, ya, yes, sure, sorry, salut, and more) adverbs
(always, exactly, so forth), and verbs (respect, rap, add). Meanwhile, inter-sentential CS
occurred less frequently and included such full clauses as Keep it real, Let’s get it!, Let’s
do it!, Make it bang!, Why not?, What do you think? , Doesn’t make sense!, Can’t do it,
Thank you!, So fancy right now.
In terms of CS position within the turn, three different patterns were identified: a)
turn-initial CS (for example, “keep it real” in excerpt 4, “million dollars” in excerpt 10,
“still here” in except 11, etc.), b) turn-internal CS (for example, “trap”, “flex”, and “dark”
in excerpt 11, “rich” & “gospel” in excerpt 12), and c) turn-final CS (for example, “real
flashy” and “fake flashy” in excerpt 6, “thank you” in excerpt 7 and 9, “make it bang”
excerpt 11). In the analyzed data, turn-initial CS and turn-final CS occurred more often
than the turn-internal CS. The position of CS within the turn is of central importance, as
it is primarily through the sequencing patterns that CS unfolded as markers of stance in
analyzed interactions.
26
sections: positioning stance (excerpt 1), evaluation (excerpt 2), and alignment (or
disaligment as in excerpt 3). With purpose to unfold the stance taking process, it depended
on CS as a mechanism that claims the indexes, the ideologies and identity of speakers.
5.3.1 Code-switching as positioning strategy
Excerpt 1: BinZ discussed with Gonzo (GZ) about the topic and the preparation for
16Typh performance in episode 13, the breakout round. BinZ is the coach of Gonzo (he
is a candidate belongs to BinZ’s team)
1 BZ 84:35:00 Thầy giáo chào thầy giáo ((pound hug))
Teacher greets teacher!
Coach greets the teacher!
2 GZ 84:36:00 (hih) Em chào thầy
Hello coach!
Hello coach!
3 BZ 84:38:00 Hi em! Cái vòng đấu của em thì những đối thủ của em là (point
to the poster)
Hi brother! The round battle of you so your opponents are
Hi! Your opponents in the next ground are...
4 GZ 84:41:00 Tage
Tage?
5 BZ 84:42:00 Yes, yes yes
84:43:00 Gonzo narrates
6 BZ 84:48:00 Tage cũng là học trò của em?
Tage also is student of you?
Is Tage your student?
84:49:00 BZ narrates
7 BZ 84:55:00 theo như anh biết là lần này cái chủ đề nó rất là open.
As I know is this time the topic it is open
As I know, the topic is so open
8 84:57:00 Của em sẽ là thành ngữ tục ngữ.
Yours will be idioms and proverbs
It's idioms and proverbs
9 84:59:00 Em có thể làm mọi thứ ở trên cái chủ đề này.
You can do everything on this topic
You can do everything about this topic
85:01:00 Gonzo narrates
85:11:00 BZ narrates
10 BZ 85:15:00 Cái sự trau chuốt, cái sự chỉnh chu ở trong cái flow của em,
anh là người thấy điều đó rất là rõ,
The carefulness, the elegance in the flow of you, I am the
person see it really clear
I can see the carefulness and elegance in your flow
11 85:19:00 và anh nghĩ cái nhịp old school sẽ là cái nhịp rất là tốt để làm
cho cái điều đó nó toả sáng.
And I think the beat old school will be the beat really good to
make those shiny
I think old school beat is good to help you shine
12 85:23:00 Mình có thể nghe thử cái beat nha để xem mình có cái gì hay
ho xảy ra không.
28
In excerpt 1, BZ and GZ talked about the topic of this round, exchanging their
idea of how Gonzo would develop his song, and listening to the prepared beat together.
At first, both BZ and GZ greet each other in English, which may mark they are both fluent
or familiar with this code (their background). It alerts the capacity to interpret other
linguistic choices cognitively. In line X, BZ then answers the question of GZ using
English interjection Yes, yes, yes (line 5) and starts mixing codes throughout his turns. In
line X, BZ informs GZ about the topic information and comments upon that with CS open
in line 7. He continues with giving suggestions for GZ from his own knowledge as a
coach, employing such CS as flow (line 10), old school (line 11), beat (line 12), (drum)
sample (line 16). All of these hip-hop-related English terms allow him to position himself
as a commentator in the conversation with GZ, therefore the marked choice of English is
preferred to position in the rap music setting. In line X, BZ uses "timeless" for the rap
genres that Gonzo mentioned. By taking an evaluation stance for Gonzo ("timeless
value"), he establishes his authoritative status (his knowledge) as a forerunner and an
30
artist who gains attention about rap music to multiple countries. Nonetheless, he aligns
with Gonzo idea about picking up the 19th rap genre for his next round. In the last turn,
line X, GZ agreed with BZ with Yes sir! Let's do it! (line 32) and laughs. BZ in response,
repeats GZ utterance in equal code Let’s do it! (line 33) and salutes with a pound hug.
Their moves in choosing linguistics codes are depends on (i) the topic of their
conversation (rap music performance), (ii) responses of their interlocutor (both switch) –
capacity of speakers to interpret choice of other, (iii) showing epistemic stance, and (iv)
their calculation on the in-group rap community input (hip-hop music genres and hip-hop
gestures) of other to turn in their marked choice.
5.3.2 Code-switching as evaluation strategy
Excerpt 2: Tran Thanh (TT), Karik (KR) and JustaTee (JT) discuss the performance of
TLinh (TL) in episode 15 – the final round. TT is the MC of the show; KR is one of four
coaches; JT is one of two judges; and TL is a candidate.
1 TT 44:19:00 Okay, tui thấy là KR phải đứng lên, KR thấy sao
Okay, I see that KR has to stand up, KR feel how?
Ok, I saw Karik stood up, what do you think?
2 KR 44:22:00 Bây giờ lúc này thì cái nón của JT để cứu TLinh nó quá xứng
đáng
Now at the moment that the hat of JT to save TLinh it so worth
I can see that golden hat of Justa Tee is so worth it
3 44:27:00 tại vì đây là tiết mục nó chất, chất không còn gì để nói
Because this is performance so swag, swag nothing to say
This is such a swag performance, nothing else to say
4 44:31:00 từ hình thể tới cách cách sắp xếp bố cục bài và cách chọn type
beat luôn
From body language to way arrange structure the song and
way select type beat also
From your body language to song structure, and beat type
choice
5 44:36:00 và kể cả vũ đạo của em và thần thái của em mọi thứ nó rất là
match(ed) với nhau
And also dancing move of you and spirit of you, everything it
really is matched together
Even your dancing moves and spirit, everything matches
6 44:40:00 và anh – anh muốn chết lặng luôn, so ((showing surrender))
((bowing))
And I – I want numb such, so
I feel like, numb, so (1.0)
7 TL 44:45:00 [Em cảm ơn
Thank you
Thank you
8 TT [Tui hiểu những gì KR đang trải qua
I understand things KR is experiencing
I know what KR going through
31
TLinh is the only female rapper that JT saved her by his golden hat at the end of
the breakout round. She performed the song “Chú chó trên ôtô" (nodding dog toy in the
car) of hip-hopper rock the stage. TT mentions KR action in Vietnamese đứng lên (stood
up – in line 1), to inform KR turn in the flow of conversation. He asked for KR
knowledge/opinion about the performance of TL – request for KR epistemic stance , as
if KR co-ordinates with his suggestion (the show was so great that KR had to stand up
and show his appreciation). To respond, KR projects his affective stance, he mixes codes
match(ed) (line 5), type beat (line 4) to confirm his belief that TL was successful. His CS
is calculated to communicate with TL, showing his empathetic and signals his identity as
a rapper. His role as a coach encouraged him to use English as keywords in his speech.
His turn is ended with so (line 6), gestures of supplicating and pause (1.0), they can be
interpreted as word-searching. This break is elaborated by TT international (line 9) and
an interjection Wow (line 11). TT uses his linguistic choice as links, from his identity as
non-rapper nor musical background, (i) to resume KR sentences (overlapped with TL to
co-construct the turn-in progress at KR turn); (ii) to align with KR stance.
5.3.3 Code-switching as disalignment strategy
Excerpt 3: Tran Thanh (TT), Wowy (WW), SuBoi (SB), BinZ (BZ) discuss WW's joke
on threatening other coaches and judges before performances of his team members in
episode 14, the breakout round. TT is the MC of the show; WW, SB and BZ are three of
four coaches.
1 SB 4:11 Ủa, còn bên đây thì sao?
Hay, abour here so what
Hey, what about me?
2 TT 4:13 Con - con gái, người ta hổng có ấy
A – a girl, he not do it
32
female rapper who is one of coaches in the show who WW approached lastly. BZ opts
for English code to disalign with WW and shakes his head. His position is overtly
negative toward WW act - , in line 6, he utters no, no, can't do it, can't do it is uttered to
confront WW, a person with whom he shares who has the same authoritative status, same
ethnic background, same gender (both male) and the same community of practice
(rapper). In the same line (line 6), he then chooses Vietnamese to request WW taking his
step back. His move displays his moral stance by protecting SB and disalignment with
WW. In line 11, TT interrupts WW with his appraisal of BZ employing manly, and takes
a full turn by a mix-code exclamation sentence (gentleman, line 17). He co-constructs in
the turn-in progress and aligns with BZ (uses the same code as BZ as a facility of
expression and distance from WW. English as an unmarked choice It appears that his
linguistic choice is rational, based on RO set, his belief on gender norms.
5.4 Stances relating to hip-hop identity
The sequencing pattern of CS in conversation left evidence on the function CS is
employed as primarily as a stance marker for interactants to project their social identities
and to signal their relationship (alignment, belonging) to the and language ideology of
hip-hop culture. The relationship to hip-hop culture is indexed through three different
stance projections, namely, realness (keepin’ it real stance in excerpt 4, 5, and 6), street
credibility (respect/give props stance in excerpt 7, 8, and 9), and aggressiveness (gangsta
stance in excerpt 10, 11, and 12). In the following sections I discuss these stancetaking
strategies in more detail. Those mentioned stance-taking strategies provided an insight
view of the complex sociocultural meaning and complex interactive constructed identity
of Vietnamese rappers, interpersonal interaction. They first use their stance to claim
authority and aligned or disaligned with other participants. There are three patterns that
were found out: turn-initial CS (for example, “keep it real” in excerpt 4, “million dollars”
in excerpt 10, “still here” in except 11, etc), turn-internal CS (for example, “trap”, “flex”,
and “dark” in excerpt 11, “rich” & “gospel” in excerpt 12), and turn-final CS (for
example, “real flashy” and “fake flashy” in excerpt 6, “thank you” in excerpt 7 and 9,
“make it bang” excerpt 11). In naturally-occurring conversation, the turn-initial CS and
turn-final CS occurred more often than the turn-internal code-switching.
5.4.1 Code-switching as a marker of keepin’ it real stance
According to Cutler (2003: 215), hip-hop’s “keepin’ it real” doctrine is built upon:
34
(1) the idea that people should present themselves for what they are not “front”
with respect to class, race and language use; and (2) the idea that realness has
to do with being connect to “the street” or the urban ghetto in both a physical
and a linguistic sense.
Hip-hop artists in Vietnam rely on this very same ideological doctrine of authenticity to
discursively construct themselves as belonging to this community of practice. The
language ideology of hip-hoppers was the referenced framework to analyze how
conversational participants construct themselves as authentic.
Excerpt 4: Tran Thanh (TT), Wowy (WW) discuss the performance of Thanh Draw (TD)
in episode 15 – the final round. TT is the MC of the show, WW is one of the coaches.
1 TT 76:03:00 WW em thấy sao?
WW, you feel how?
Wowy, what do you think?
2 WW 76:05:00 Keep it real, thành thật mà nói, thì em đã đoán trúng (shoulder
shrug) =
Keep it real, honestly to say, that I did guess right
Keep it real, I have to say honestly, I guessed it right
3 TD 76:08:00 = Yeah, you're right!
4 WW 76:10:00 (hahah) (0.5)
5 76:11:00 Em rất là cháy bỏng nha,
You really are hot
You have so much fire
6 76:13:00 khả năng của em cho tới hiện tại nó on the next level
ability of you until now it on the next level
your performing skill is at the next level
7 76:17:00 anh rất là vui khi mà thấy qua một cái chương trình RV như thế
này. Các bạn rapper có thể ngày càng ngày càng giống với các
superstars nhiều hơn nữa đó.
I really am happy when see through a show Rap Viet like this.
The fellow rappers can day by day like with the super stars
much more then.
I feel so happy after this show, rappers become more and more
like super stars
8 76:26:00 Anh hông có nhìn ra nổi em luôn đó.
I not recognize can you then
I can't recognize you
76:28:00 Em so fancy right now!
You so fancy right now!
You are so fancy right now!
9 TT 76:31:00 yeah, thật sự =
yeah, truly
yeah, truly
10 WW 76:32:00 = Tới mức mà anh ngồi anh nói tiếng anh luôn đó anh Thành
(2.0)
35
So much that you sit you speak English too Mr. Thanh
You even speak English, Mr.Thanh
11 76:36:00 Á lộn, [em ngồi em nói tiếng anh.] ((laugh))
Ah mistake, I sit I speak English
My mistake, I speak English
12 76:36:30 [(hahah)
13 TT 76:40:00 Okay, cảm ơn WW, anh biết là cái cảm xúc này rất là thú vị, tại
vì chúng ta rất phấn khích qua cái tiết mục vừa rồi.
Okay, thank WW, I know that the emotion this really is
interesting, because we really excited about the performance
recent.
Ok, I know how it feels, we're all so excited after his
performance
14 76:47:00 Thực sự là như vậy anh đứng ở dưới mà anh cứ nhún nhảy theo
em thôi. Tại vì nó thực sự là catchy
Really is like that, I stand over there and I also dance follow you
so. Because it really is catchy
For real though, I had to dance along, it's really catchy
In excerpt 4, Thanh Draw rapped a song named “Thành Thật” (Honesty) was
about the realness of a rapper. Before the performance of Thanh Draw, WW predicted
Thanh Draw would bring something strong, active and explosive to the stage. After TT
initiates the conversation by asking in Vietnamese if WW still keeps his opinion, WW,
em thấy sao? (How do you feel, WW?, line 1), WW’s (in line 2) immediate CS to English
“keep it real” allows him to position himself as both a coach (commenter) in this rap show
and a member of a rap community. The subsequent code-switches in line 6 (on the next
level), line 7 (superstar), line 8 (so fancy right now) help him to confirm his authoritative
stance and his empathetic about Thanh Draw ability. Turn-final CS is employed to close
up his turn with an exclamatory sentence in line 8, Em so fancy right now!. He
ambiguously indexes (i) his identity (underground rapper) in this answer, (ii) his persona
and (iii) the norm of in-group rap community. The mutual understanding about “Keep it
real” is a mantra in hip-hop, individuals' urge to be true to their roots is shared in public
discourse, (except TT). He rationally makes sure his position as (sincere) stance about his
previous prediction about TD performance. Thanh Draw shows his appreciation to WW
about his belief by switching to English yeah, you’re right, line 3. This act is encouraged
from his background of TD is a graphic designer who belongs to the younger rapper
generation than WW. He was born in Hai Phong and lives in Saigon (both urban cities).
The interaction in time of TD, no silence between him and WW, projects his clarification
on WW utterance, he eagerly supports WW belief about his performance. In this case,
36
unmarked choice of CS is rational (Myers S., 2001), he signals his understanding of (i)
the stance of WW, (ii) his role/ relation within this context as a candidate (WW is a coach)
(iii) his identity as a rapper – RO set, from rap community aspect, his linguistic choice as
links between him and WW. His affective stance is projected equal English code to WW
code of “Keep it real" – language in use in their rap community (WW & TD). WW set a
value for Thanh Draw's performance by his evaluation stance. As a person who has
succeeded and got respect from the Vietnamese Hip-hop community from the beginning.
Excerpt 5: The coaches and the judges were invited to give a comment on a battle of two
candidates (16Typh and LeeBoo) in episode 10. SB is the last coach who gives a comment
before Ryhmastic (RM) – one of the judges starts.
1 SB 37:14:00 Thật ra con gái không phải là mình cứ nói cái gì cool, ngầu hay
là màu mè, thì người ta thích đâu
Actually, the girls not have be we keep something cool, cool, or
is colourful, that they like yet.
Actually, girls don't always like cool and colorful things
2 37:19:00 Mà người ta muốn thấy được em là ai
Yet they want see well you are who
They want to know who you are
3 37:22:00 [Vâng
Yes
Yes
4 37:22:00 [Đó, cho nên chị nhìn những cái bài trước của em đó, nó rất là
hay
Yes, so that I look other songs previous of you, they really are
good
Your previous songs are so good
5 37:26:00 mà nếu như em bỏ 50% cái đó, rồi 50% mà em học của anh BZ
là chắc chắn là đẹp luôn
And if you combine 50% those, then 50% which you learn of
Mr. BZ that really great is.
If you combine 50% of your old self and 50% new things you
learn from BinZ, it'd be great
6 37:31:00 Em cảm ơn ạ
I thank you!
Thank you!
7 RM 37:35:00 Anh biết là 16Typh có một thế mạnh rất lớn khi mà rap về
những nội dung về xã hội,
I know that 16Typh has a strength really big when rap about
the issues about society.
I know 16 Typh has much strength to rap about social issues-
8 37:40:00 về tình cảm anh em, cũng như là cái lối sống real,
About the hood of brothers, as well as the lifestyle real.
about brotherhood or real lifestyle
9 37:44:00 và anh nghĩ là những cái chủ đề như thế nó sẽ giúp bật cái sức
mạnh của em lên hơn là một cái chủ đề về tình yêu.
37
And I think that those topics like that they will help show the
strength of you up more than a topic about love
I think those topics are better for you to show yourself than love
In excerpt 5, 16Typth (16T) and LeeBoo performed a flirting song "Gặp nhau là
skrrt" (Skrrt any time we meet) on the trap flow. Skrrtt is an onomatopoeia for the sound
of tires screeching, used by trap rappers. Trap music is a subgenre of hip-hop, it originated
from Atlanta where trap in slang means illegal drug selling area. The judges had to decide
who would be selected to go for the next round – the breakthrough. SB starts her turn by
mixing English code cool (line 1), to emphasize her dispreference and to contrast with
the cool image 16T and LeeBoo had shown in their performance. From her view of a
woman, opening up to two young male, about how girls would love to know about them.
Because 16T and LeeBoo belong to BZ’s team. She suggests they should keep their
selfness and learn from BZ to develop it in their songs. Subsequently RM also continues
on the flow of conversation by mixing English code real (line 8). He shows his authority
about the forte topic (brotherhood & real lifestyle) which would support 16T more than
a topic about love. His move is elaborating on the suggestion of SB for 16T to be his real
version (who is from an underground background). Interacting with SB and 16T, RM not
only projects his identity as a speaker but also creates a link between his turn and SB turn
by using his linguistic choice of English. Moreover, he rationally picks English as a code
to put forward the core ideology of hip-hoppers and this act can be identified as the keepin'
it real stance of Ryhmastic.
Excerpt 6: Tran Thanh, Karik, Wowy, BinZ and JustaTee (JT) discuss the performance
of Hanh Or in episode 6. TT is the MC of the show; KR, WW and BZ are three coaches;
and JT is one of two judges.
1 TT 82:05:00 Và bây giờ hai giám khảo sẽ là người quyết định, Hành về với
tô cháo nào
And now two judges will be persons decide Hanh go to bows
porridge which
Now two judges decide which "porridge" bow that "Hanh"
belongs to
2 KR 82:11:00 (hah)
3 JT 82:13:00 Đây là một cái lá bài rất là mạnh
This is a card really such strong.
He's such a strong factor
4 82:15:00 Cho nên là ở đây có ai muốn nói bất cứ điều gì để =
So that is right here have anyone want talk any thing to
38
In the first round of the show (the conquering round), four couches had to press
his/her button to select a candidate into his/her team while this candidate was
performing. If there were more than one couch choosing a candidate, the decision would
belong to two judges. Hanh Or was selected by all couches and touched their admiration
by his song "Beethoven trappin'" on the soundtrack of "Fur Elise'' (Beethoven),
combining classical music with hip-hop. He owned an impressive performance with his
artistic style, mastering the voice and stage and his dancing capability. In excerpt 6,
39
WW and BZ were two promising teams for the coaches to resolve. JT invites both of
them to speak for themselves and persuades him and RM. The debate is in Vietnamese
until BZ presented himself as flashy in English (line 9). He contrasts himself with WW
by using metaphor, Hanh Or as a star. He points out that the rap style of WW was
simple, and his is flashy (line 9), enough for the star to shine. His intention was to stress
his catchy rap style would fit Hanh Or more than of WW. For communicative purposes,
WW reflects himself in response for BZ as real flashy (line 13). Thus, he corrects the
statement of BZ without hesitation and shows distance with BZ as fake flashy (line 13).
His stance is constructed based on his situational coherence, from his position as
forerunner underground rapper who had kept the realness from the beginning of his
career until now. On the other side, based on his authoritative status, he implicitly
invites and encourages Hanh Or to build up the same real style as him. Both WW and
BZ self-present themselves by employing English code as the turn-final alternative
code. WW, in particular, his calculation on the previous turn of BZ exposes to an extent
of the markedness model. The language use arrived between BZ and WW was
Vietnamese mixed with English adjectives specifically, and in the hip-hop community
at large.
5.4.2 Code-switching as a marker of giving props/respect stances
Membership in the hip-hop nation is a reward in which it is created, recognized
and reconciled by its audience. Hip-hop artists with their length of service and stability
in hip-hop music are reckoned as long-term members. They serve as national builders and
have power to influence their fellow and to monitor the authenticity of audiences and
artists (Morgan, 2001). Receiving props or having respect from a long-term member
would be considered as granting membership to the younger hip-hop generations in their
community. Through hip-hop sub-cultural and linguistic symbols (word, expression, and
messages, etc), urban youth signify their membership, role and status in their speech
(Cutler, 2003). They constantly re-work the language style of AAE and represent the hip-
hop culture, which provides a frame for researchers to recognize and to interpret their
stance behind it. Their linguistic practices in following excerpts would serve as evidence
of how they define themselves with respect to others within the hip-hop community in
Vietnam.
40
Excerpt 7: TT, BZ discusses the performance of Ricky Star, GDucky (GD) and KR in the
final round. TT is the MC of the show; BZ and KR are both coaches; Ricky Star and
GDucky are candidates.
1 BZ 69:13:00 Một tràng pháo tay nồng nhiệt cho ba thầy trò. Woa:::
An applause big for three coach attendants. Woa::
A big applause for this triple!
2 69:20:00 Explosion, ô, thật sự bùng nổ
Explosion, oh, really explosed.
Explosion. Oh, it's real explosion
3 69:21:00 BZ, em thấy thế nào
BZ, you feel how?
BZ, how do you feel?
4 69:23:00 Trước hết em nói về người bạn của em KR, trước - trước khi anh
nói về hai em
At first I talk about the friend of mine KR, before – before I talk
about two you
I have to say about my friend Karik first, before talking about
you two
5 69:26:00 Thực sự là ở đây mình cảm nhận được là KR ở trên đó rap cả
con tim ra ngoài luôn
Really is right here I feel can that KR up there rap all the heart
out.
I can really feel that Karik raps all of his heart out
6 69:30:00 Mình cảm nhận được điều đó và mình nể phục điều đó
I feel can that thing and I admire that thing.
I can feel it and I admire it
7 69:32:00 Respect, much respects ((clap hands)) =
8 69:33:00 = Cho KR thêm một tràng pháo tay, được không ạ ((clap hands))
9 Give KR more one applause, can you?
One more applause for Karik, please!
10 69:37:00 Gducky và Ricky Star, cả hai em đều có những cái sự tinh tế ở
trong cái bài nhạc
GDucky and Ricky Star, both two you evenly have much the
elegance in the song.
Both GDucky and Ricky Star have elegance in this song
11 69:42:00 Cách tụi em ra vào trong cái bài nhạc, làm sao tụi em thả về cái
hook hoặc là tụi em vào cái hook ra sao
Way you go out in of the song, way you let go the hook or you
come back in the hook how
The way you hold and let the hook go
12 69:46:00 Mọi thứ nó đều rất là đẹp, và rất là tuyệt vời
Everything is so nice and great
13 69:48:00 Một bài hát amazing ((clap hands))
A song amazing
Such an amazing song!
14 69:50:00 Thank you! ((clap hands))
69:51:00 thank you cho cái màn trình diễn vừa rồi
15 Thank for this performance!
41
In excerpt 7, GDucky, Ricky Star and KR. Their song was ALA ELA, which made
everyone have to stand up and dance along. After TT giving his expression in English
Explosion (line 2), he initiates the conversation by asking BZ’s opinion on this
performance in Vietnamese BinZ, em thấy thế nào? (BZ, how do you feel) in line 3. BZ
replies in Vietnamese and code-switches to English respect (line 7) and claps his hands
to finish his part which was only to his addressee - KR. This action allows him to position
himself as (i) a commenter in the show, (ii) an audience and (iii) a member of a rap
community. He uses English code respect - a keyword used in the hip-hop community to
give props (respect) to hip-hop artists, which in this case, is to KR. His next sentence, in
line 8, he calls for appraisal and alliance from the audiences and other attendants by
clapping their hands. This give props/respect stance is not only held within the hip-hop
community but also shouted to the larger audience/community. The subsequent code-
switches hook (line 11), amazing (line 13), thank you (line 14 & 15) help him to confirm
his authoritative stance and his alignment with TT initial CS about the performance
GDucky, Ricky Star and Karik.
Excerpt 8: Tran Thanh, JustaTee and Rhymastic discuss the performance of Dế Choắt
(DC) in episode 3. TT is the MC of the show, JT and RM are the two judges; and DC is
a candidate.
1 TT 63:53:00 JT?
2 JT 63:54:00 Trước hết, là phải ngưỡng mộ cách bạn ấy chọn lọc từ,
First of all, is have admire way he select word
First, I admire how he uses the words
3 63:57:00 Không thừa không thiếu
No excess no lack
No less, no more
4 63:58:00 Từ nào cũng rất là đắt trong cái bài nhạc này
Word any also really is costly in the song this.
All the words are brilliant
5 64:00:00 Và thứ hai, cái sự biến hoá của em (0.2) trên sân khấu, phóng
khoáng, tự do
And the second, the way changing of you (0.2) on the state,
open, free
Second, how you change on stage openly and freely
6 64:03:00 em đã làm rất tốt ở vòng đầu rồi
You did do really well in round audition already.
It's so free, you did it so well in the audition round
7 64:07:00 Mọi người có thể thấy em chạy khắp sân khấu
Everyone able to see you run around the stage
We saw you running around the stage
8 64:10:00 Xong rồi em làm mọi thứ nó rất là hồn nhiên
42
Excerpt 9: Tran Thanh, Wowy, BinZ, Karik discuss the performance of Duy Andy, MCK,
and Yuno Bigboy in episode 8. TT is the MC of the show; WW, BZ and KR are three of
four coaches; Duy Andy, MCK, and Yuno Bigboy(YunoBB) are candidates
1 WW 45:56:00 Yeah yeah, anyway, anh rất là happy, anh rất là happy
I so am happy, I so am happy
Anyways, I'm so happy
2 TT 46:05:00 Xin cảm ơn đóng góp của huấn luyện viên WW
Would thank feedback of coach WW
Thank the feedback from Wowy!
3 46:08:00 Đó người ta đang trách BZ là tại sao nãy giờ không đứng lên,
để ngồi địa hàng đúng hông
See he blames BZ that why during time not stand up, to hunt
right?
He blames BinZ for not standing up, you focus on hunting
4 BZ 46:12:00 WW nói đúng (á) thực sự một cái bài hát quá hay, đập vào
mặt anh. Anh chỉ có vài phút để anh không hiểu, tại sao mình
chỉ được chọn một người trong cái bộ ba quá kinh khủng này
WW says correctly really a song great, hit on my face. I only
have few minutes to I not understand, why I only can choose
one in the triple so super this
Wowy is right, this song is so great, and I had only a few
minutes to process why I can only choose one in the super
triple
5 46:20:00 Cái việc KR đang làm anh respect cái điều đó
The thing KR is doing I respect the thing that
I respect what Karik is doing
6 46:22:00 Tại vì cái sự hy sinh KR phải có để tạo ra cái tác phẩm hôm
nay
Because the sacrifice KR must have to create the product
today
Because he has to sacrifice to have this product
7 46:26:00 Thank you KR để có một cái màn trình diễn tuyệt vời như
vậy
to have a performance great like this.
Thank Karik for such a great performance!
8 KR 46:28:00 ((KR bumps his fist to his chest))
9 BZ 46:29:00 Khi mà cái nốt đầu tiên của MCK vang lên là anh biết đây sẽ
là một cái gì đó rất là kinh khủng
When the note at first of MCK is on that I know this will be
something really super
When MCK's note hit it, I knew it would become something so
super
10 46:34:00 cho những năm sắp tới của hip-hop Việt nam
For the years upcoming of hip-hop Viet Nam
For the upcoming years of Viet Nam hiphop
12 46:36:00 Và nối tiếp theo sau đó là Andy, em dùng cái kỹ thuật
beatbox của mình rất là đúng chỗ,
And continue after that is Andy, you use the skill beatbox of
you really right place,
45
And then Andy, you used your beatbox skill at the right place
12 46:41:00 và không có lạm dụng nó
And you not overuse it.
You didn't use it too much
13 46:42:00 Và tới khi Yuno BB xuất hiện thì một cái nốt end quá đẹp
cho cái verse 1, và đến cái chorus thì mọi thứ nổ tung lên
luôn
And until Yuno BB appear so a note end so nice for the verse
1, and until the chorus so everything exploded well
Yuno Bigboi was a good ending for verse 1 and until the
chorus, things exploded
14 46:50:00 Sorry tụi em vì không thể đứng lên anh nhảy, tại vì anh vẫn
đang không hiểu tại sao phải loại hai tụi em ra trong ba người
này,
Sorry all you because not able stand up dance, because I still
being not understand why must eliminate two of you in three
persons here
I'm sorry for not standing up and dancing along, since I
didn't understand why we should eliminate 2 in this triple
15 46:55:00 Chúc mừng màn trình diễn =
Congrats the performance
Congrats on this performance!
16 46:56:00 = Em cảm ơn anh (Duy Andy, MCK, and Yuno BB chorus)
I thank you brother
Thank you!
17 TT 46:58:00 Biết tại sao phải loại hông BZ, tại vì người ta biết là sẽ có
người quăng nón á (hah) =
Know why must eliminate BZ, because he knows that will be
someone throw hat so
Do you know why we have to eliminate them? Because he
knows someone will throw a hat
18 KR 47:05:00 = Yeah, exactly
Except 9 was pulled from episode 8, KR team stepped in the battle round (3rd
round). Team members were paired into two or three members to battle. The judges (JT
and RM) can only choose one candidate in each battle to join the breakout round. This
conversation is about the battle of three members: Duy Andy, MCK, and Yuno Bigboy.
They are three most talented candidates in the team of KR which bring up a hard time for
the judge to decide. They perform the song "M.A.Y", belonging to the boom bap
genre, about their love for a girl named Rap. It was so stirring that all coaches and judges
had to stand up, except BZ. During WW previous turn, he answered when TT mocked
BZ of why he did not stand up and cheer while Duy Andy, MCK, and YunoBB were
performing. WW guessed that BZ was wondering whether to throw the hat because there
is still a team left to perform (team of SB). WW mentioned that BZ was just as WW, still
have their rights to use the golden hat (the hat is used to save one rapper from other teams
46
who is not selected by JT and RM). SB team members were so strong, he kept thinking
as if he should use his hat or not until the song ended. WW put an end for his turn by
employing English interjection Yea Yea and adjective happy (line 1). His sentence
confirms his evaluation stance of how happy he is, watching the performance. TT gives
the floor to BZ with a question in Vietnamese, asking for the confirmation on the claim.
BZ's first reaction is to align with WW clarification for his action (not standing to dance
and encourage). He then switches code with respect (line 5) and Thank you (line 7) to
signal his stance toward KR. This code raises multiple meanings in BZ statement: (i)
support his evaluation on the performance (ii) his appreciation to KR arrangement (iii)
project his empathy on how and why KT put three out-standing rappers into one battle.
His respect stance not only sets a high value for the performance but also reveals an extent
of deferring. KR immediately recognizes this respect stance of BZ and gestures himself
by bumping his fist to the chest, line 8 – a way of presenting respect in the hip-hop
community. BZ and KR calculate both the code choice (English) and the gesture to
converse their respect stance – one of the core ideological doctrines of the hip-hop
community in this interaction. The following code switches, BZ assigns beatbox (line 12)
for Duy Andy, end (line 13) for Yuno Bigboy, and chorus (for all), supporting his
authoritative stance as a commentator. In addition, he apologizes in English, sorry (line
14) for not cheering them at first and elaborate on it. At this point, he refers back to WW
evaluation, showing his regret and aligning with WW evaluation stance one more time.
TT concludes the discussion in Vietnamese as a tease, predicting BZ would use the right
of his gold hat to scout one rapper to his team (out of two expelled ones). In the Vietnam
rapper community, WW, BZ and KR are considered as long-term members and nation
builders by their influences on the newbie (rapper at fresh level). Vietnamese code is a
dominant language in between the coaches (WW, BZ, and KR) but hip-hop English
keywords and English code are employed for some specific aspects such as evaluation,
praise and solidarity in their hip-hop social group. It presents their beliefs and has
consequences on others by their tun-in-progress conversation.
5.4.3 Code-switching as a marker of gangsta stances
The aggressive or gangsta rap is the common theme in rap lyrics which relates to
the violent lifestyle as thug or gangsta. Even though the quintessential gangsta track as
defined by Quinn (2005: 6) is “rich, dramatic storytelling in the first person; an ethic of
47
Excerpt 10: BZ is the last coach giving comment on the performance of 16T (a candidate),
before JT, RM (who are the judges) discuss the performance of 16T in episode 4 – the
conquering round.
1 BZ 72:27:00 Anh nghĩ là bản thân em biết rõ hơn ai hết, cái này là cái
million dollar flows em có ngay ở đây
I think you know clear more than anyone, this is a million dollar
flow you have right here.
I know you know for sure that it's a million dollar flow you have
2 72:33:00 Em phải biết điều đó
You have know that.
You have to know it
3 72:34:00 Cái flow này là hit maker flow, nó không phải flow để nghe,
mà là flow cho hit
A flow this is hit maker flow, it is not flow to hear, but is flow
for hit.
It's a hit maker flow, not for listening, it's to be a hit
4 72:38:00 Anh nhìn thấy được điều đó ở em
I see can that in you
I can see it in you
5 72:39:00 Như JT có nói á, mình làm (0.2) phức tap rất là dễ, nhưng mà
mình làm cho nó đơn giản mà hay nó sẽ rất là khó
As JT have talk that, we make (0.2) complicated very is easy,
but we make it simple yet good it will very is hard.
Like Justa Tee says, it's easy to make a complicated song, it's so
hard to make a simple but good song
6 72:46:00 Tại vì anh nghĩ là với cái tư cách một người viết nhạc, một
người nghệ sĩ thì cái việc mà mình add thêm vào.
48
In the excerpt 10, 16Typh performed a song named "Khói thuốc" (Smoke) about
a love breakup. Despite other coaches, commenting on his rap lines/lyrics, BZ focuses on
the music flow of 16T and he calls it a million dollars flow (line 1). He starts his turn with
unmarked intra-sentential CS, and projects his gangsta stance to value the performance
of 16Typth. Leaving evidence for this gangsta stance and allocates his social background
(i) a Vietnamese lived abroad who went back and joined the subculture music flow here,
(ii) his skill in gangsta rap, (iii) a coach who offered 16T join to his team explicitly. The
subsequent code-switch in line 6, add, conveys his concern on how 16T would be able to
make such a costly hit but remained simple. In addition, it exhibits his judgement from
the perspective of a commercial rapper in Vietnam, who has released many hits on the
same gangsta rap genre. To close up his turn, he uses English interjection Salut! (line 9).
CS that is used in BZ turn matches with (i) his situational comprehension and his local
intentions in this conversation. When 16T joined the conversation in Vietnamese (line
20), expressed his faith in the choice of JT and RM handing him to a coach team. RM
starts his turn in Vietnamese then switches to English to repeat flow and million dollar
(line 22). He legistes what BZ had said and shows solidarity. In this turn, he signaled his
understanding and authority of the current situation, what BZ meant and the trust of 16T
from the role of (i) a producer (ii) a rapper (iii) an evaluator. This unmarked CS implicitly
confirms that BZ was the most matched choice, according to the gangsta stance he casted.
They shared coherence of English to the extent of hip-hop culture and the meaning of
gangsta image within it. And combined it in the commercial palatability of hip-hop in
Vietnam, which triggered the cause of alternation.
Excerpt 11: BinZ discussed with 16T about the topic and the preparation for 16T
performance in episode 11. BZ is the coach of 16T (a candidate belonging to BZ team).
1 BZ 40:29:00 Still here! ((pound hug))
50
16 BZ 41:20:00 = Ya ((nod))
17 41:21:00 Thì anh với anh Hoàng cũng chuẩn bị sẵn một cái beat cho em
So I and Mr. Hoang also prepared already a beat for you
I and Mr.Hoang prepared a beat for you
18 41:23:00 Anh xin Mie cho anh
I would ask Mie for me.
Mie, please drop the beat!
(music on)
41:32:00 BZ narrates
19 16T 41:39:00 (rapping on the beat)
41:43:00 16Typh narrates
20 BZ 41:50:00 Thank you em, thank you em! (talk to Mie)
Thank you sister, thank you sister
Thank you! Thank you!
21 16T 41:51:00 Hợp lý đấy anh ạ
Make sense brother.
It makes sense
41:52:00 BZ narrates
22 BZ 41:56:00 Có cái gì nó xảy ra ở trong đầu em ngay lúc này hông?
Have anything it happen in the head of you right now or not?
Anything happening in your mind right now?
23 16T 42:00:00 Chắc em sẽ làm hơi trêu chọc một tí
Maybe I will do slightly tease a bit.
I'll do it a bit teasing
24 BZ 42:02:00 Anh ủng hộ
I support
I support you
25 42:02:00 Nhưng mà trêu chọc ai chứ? Trêu chọc Mie?
But then tease whom? Tease Mie?
But who to tease? Mie?
26 16T 42:06:00 Thôi anh ạ, em là em sẽ giữ [ở trong bài nhạc
No brother, I am I will keep [in the song
No, I'll keep it a secret
27 BZ 42:07:00 [(hah) [Mình cook, mình cook nó
sau
We cook, we cook it later
We will cook it later.
28 42:09:00 [Để em suy nghĩ cho nó chính
chắn anh ạ
Let me think about it careful
brother
I'll consider it carefully
42:11:00 16Typh narrates
29 BZ 42:17:00 (Out loud) thôi=
(Out loud) let’s
Let’s (out loud)
20 16T 42:17:30 = Yeah ((stand up))
31 BZ 42:19:00 Let's go ((shouder shrug) =
32 16T 42:19:30 = Let's do it! Make it bang anh ạ!
Let’s do it! Make it bang brother!
Let’s do it! Make it bang!
52
In excerpt 11, the conversation between 16T and BZ after 16T was selected to go
on the next round (episode 6). In episode 11, BZ announced the topic of the breakthrough
ground to 16T, including letting him listen to the prepared beat from the producer of this
show, and build up the idea for his coming performance. Opening the conversation, BZ
greeted 16T in English Still here! (line 1) and a pound hug gesture. The English
interjection Yay! (line 2) was used in response to BZ. Their code choice signaled their
ability of mastering English in conversation. Since 16T was from Hai Phong city, one of
five largest cities in Vietnam and he has been devoted to rap music since 2015. After
telling 16T the topic was "trending saying", BZ values 16T rap style as swag (line 7) and
knows that it might help him beating his opponents in this round. 16T understands BZ
projection, he confesses his identity as rapper from underground (line 10). And hoping
to bring this underground identity and gangsta style to the mainstream stage. With this
thought, he tried to set up a new RO set, he acknowledged his identity as an underground
rapper with passion for trap music. To the Vietnamese culture which is tightened with
Confucianism and Taoism, featured in humble, studious and respect. Meanwhile, gangsta
lifestyle involves a hard-hitting, angry, aggressive attitude. BZ filled the pause of 16T
(0.5) (line 13) as a sign of hesitation, using his mix-code comment on 16T as trap and
flex (line 15). In this interaction, he gestured (i) his understanding on the claimed identity
of 16T (ii) his authoritative status as an advisor who has knowledge on the same field of
trap sub-genre music, and (iii) his alignment and encouragement for 16T belief. 'Flexing'
or 'flex' is a hip-hop keyword whose design as a way of signaling the wealth and ability
of the rapper. 16T turn overlapped with BZ showed his empathy in talking with BZ, and
his effort to pursue his alignment with BZ gangsta stance. Their turn-final CS was
remarkable to look at. Both switched to English Out loud (line 26), Let's get it! (line 27),
Let's do it! and Make it bang (line 29) as a marked alteration code, this act would serve
as the ending point of their conversation. Closing up by the same gesture, they establish
the hip-hop environment where English was mixed with Vietnamese throughout their
conversation.
Excerpt 12: Tran Thanh, JustaTee, Rhymastic and GDucky discuss the performance of
GD in episode 12 – the breakout round. TT is the MC of the show; JT and RM are the
judges; and GD is a candidate.
53
Không đứng trước cái nguồn năng lượng như thế này thì em
1 JT 90:53:00 nghĩ mình nên thu mình đi một tí
No stand in front the source energy like this that I think I should
smake smaller myself a little bit
I think I need to make myself smaller in front of this huge energy
2 90:58:00 ẩn mình đi một tí
Hide myself away a bit
I hide myself a bit
3 TT 90:59:00 Ừ
Yes
Yes
4 RM 91:00:00 người ta giàu mà =
The person rich much
He's so rich
5 JT 91:01:00 = trông rich quá
Look rich so much
He looks so rich
6 RM 91:01:00 (heheh)
Okay, cái bài hát này của em không chỉ mình anh TT sởn da gà
7 JT 91:13:00 đâu,
Okay, the song here of you not only Mr TT get goosebumps so
Not only Mr.Thanh get goosebumps due to your song
8 91:18:00 mà em làm cho anh sởn da gà từ những cái bài đầu tiên của em.
That you make me get goosebumps form the first songs of you
You've made me get goosebumps from your first songs
Nguyên cái bài hát này anh hú hét rất là nhiều ở những cái phân
9 91:22:00 đoạn cao trào,
The whole performance I shouted a lot at the chorus climax
During your performance I shouted a lot at the climate of chorus
thực sự là nó quá hàn lâm so với một con người có thể mang cái
10 91:25:00 màn trình diễn này lên đây
Really is it too academic compare to a person can bring such
performance up here.
It's so academic for a man to bring this performance on the
stage
11 GD 91:29:00 Em cảm ơn anh
Thank you brother
Thank you!
Khi mà bước vào chương trình Rap Việt trong thâm tâm anh
luôn mong muốn là một ai đấy trong thí sinh có thể mang được
12 91:31:00 ví dụ là một dàn đồng ca,
When enter program Rap Viet in the mind of me always hope
that someone among candidates can bring example is a choir
Coming to this show, I always hope there's a rapper who can
bring a choir on stage
13 91:40:00 hoặc là một cái gì đấy như kiểu là thánh đường ấy,
Or is something such genre of cathedral
Or something like a cathedral
14 91:44:00 kiểu nó mang cái ý nghĩa (1.0)
Such genre carry the meaning
It means...
15 RM 91:45:00 Gospel =
16 JT 91:46:00 = Đúng rồi
54
Right
Right
và hôm nay anh được mãn nguyện khi mà em mang cái opera
17 91:47:00 lên đây,
And today I am satisfired when you bring the opera up here
Today I'm satisfied you can bring opera here
18 91:51:00 nó đẩy cái cảm xúc cao trào của cái bài hát này cùng với em,
It pushes the emotion climax of this song together with you
it pushes the emotion to the chorus with you
cực kỳ là hiệu quả và đây là cái điều anh thực sự mãn nguyện
trong
19 91:55:00 cái phần trình diễn này
highly effective and this is the thing I really satisfy in this
performance of you
it's highly effective and I feel so satisfied about it in this
performance
20 GD 91:58:00 Em cảm ơn anh ạ
Thank you brother
Thank you!
In excerpt 12, GDucky brought in the rap "Money a lot for what", his appearance
was imaged as a “king”, powerful and wealthy in a long huge fur coat. This gangsta image
has been long depicted in the hip-hop community by rappers in gangsta rap. TT asks JT
to give a comment for GDucky performance by calling JT name. JT at first answered in
Vietnamese, but when his turn was interrupted by RM appraisal (another judge) in
Vietnamese giàu (rich), in line 4. He then mixes his code, constantly reconfirms RM
statement by rich, in line 5. Their turns are unmarked CS which are connecting
simultaneously. JT’s move (i) shows his authority (ii) is driven from his empathy about
GDucky performance and appearance (iii) expresses his solidarity with RM. The
affective stance of RM receives JT alignment. Conversely, when IT pauses (1.0) to find
the suitable music term.. RM jumps in RM shows his alignment by using the English
Gospel in line 15 to fill in the pause of JT, RM follows the links in JT speaking of dàn
đồng ca (choir) in line 12 and thánh đường (cathedral) in line 13. While JT finished his
turn as a commenter (his role) who project evaluation stance to GDucky. Their
competence-related interpretation has mutally achieved – they both are capable to
interpret the linguistic choice of another. Their choices of mixing code are rational acts,
cautiously/reasonably calculated in the given interaction. Their unmarked choice also
provided proof about language use in their community (group awareness) (i) urban
citizents (both live in Hanoi) (ii) rappers.
55
6. Conclusion
The global flow of hip-hop culture has brought the identity of hip-hoppers to an
extent surpassing what an American hip-hopper would be able to express the metaphor
of authenticity. Hip-hop artists around the world, therefore, pay a great deal of attention
to their speech, overall language-use and language ideology. In order to be associated
with the communicative language practices of the AAE hip-hop community to maintain
their street credibility, they adopt hip-hop linguistic patterns (hip-hop keywords or
phrases as their focus on the meaning of words) that are rooted in AAE as methods of
their in-group speech. Those patterns allow them to signal their identity and invite other
participants' associations in the flow of conversation. Equally, Vietnamese hip-hop artists
and urban youth have adopted hip-hop subculture (Lanca, 2008), applied these patterns
into their speech style (Pham, 2018), to shape their local identity of hip-hop community
of linguistic practice. The interpretation of the CS practices in interaction of Vietnamese
hip-hoppers in this thesis has contributed to facilitating meaning and understanding their
identity-related stances. These specific stances were highlighted and emphasized by their
motivations, social features, and multilayered identities when they switched codes in the
Rap Viet show.
This thesis has showed that CS is employed by Vietnamese rappers as a resource
for stancetaking, which as allows them to index their group membership or social identity
(cf. Ochs, 1993), and project their interpersonal and social relationships between
themselves and their audiences (cf. Jaffe, 2009), such as: group solidarity, group identity,
and individual identity. With a particular intention of investment, turn-in-interaction
conversations of participants in the show had an embedded layer of stancetaking which
carries multiple ambiguous meanings in the form of CS (Jaffe, 2009; Kiesling, 2009).
Speakers in public discourse associated linguistic resources of Vietnamese and English
to take a stance and gave themselves a specific identity and imposed on others a different
one. In connection with CS, this analysis has pointed out that the unmarked choice of
interlocutor enabled them to position themselves within the concept of the hip-hop
community. English and Vietnamese had different indexes in public discourse of the Rap
Viet show, they both employed to position speakers in relation to their country, their
community ideology, and aligned or disaligned with others within their hip-hop sub-
culture group.
56
This analysis confirmed the relationship between language and identity in the hip-
hop community under the global flow of hip-hop culture. The mixing codes of English
and Vietnamese language illustrated how the global and the local are blending and co-
presenting in rap-related conversations of long-term members and the younger
generations. In examples from the keepin’ it real stance, the speakers switched and
referred to English to cast authorization on their comments. Projecting hip-hop related
stances, these Vietnamese rappers appeal to the indexes of English and to language
ideologies associated with English as an indicator of the hip-hop authenticity, and claim
their knowledge or authority. In examples from the give props/respect stance, hip-hop
English featured the connection between an evaluator and rap performers. Turn-internal
and turn-final CS showed the self-representation of Vietnamese rappers, based on their
calculations of other interlocutors. Through turn-internal CS, they expressed their
emotions, accelerated other’s evaluation, and showed solidarity with their members. The
gangsta stances of the last examples, hip-hop keywords were borrowed to legitimize the
claim of the previous turn and align with speakers of that turn. In their speech, language
practices were regarded as a localized process and manifested their social norms as part
of glocalization or Vietnamization outcome. It was triggered by the demand of urban
Vietnamese youth, for different purposes of expression, they connected/bridged their
traditional culture and hip-hop subculture in their performed code-switching.
At first, one limitation of this thesis is that it presented plainly two directions of
stance functions (follow the stancetaking act of Dubois’ triangle and the hip-hop related
stances) where CS was employed as a tool. The hip-hop artists, young generation rappers,
and the urban youth in Vietnam may project other stances with different purposes of
communication to not only their in-group community but also the out-group one. Further
research addressing a wider sociolinguistic context would be beneficial in establishing
the use of CS by re-examining the transcribed data. On that account, it might help to
conclude a more generalized interpretation about all possible kinds of stances.
Secondly, this ethnographic research included the transcribed data without taking
the visual effects into account, such as the more prominent use of English which appeared
in the written text that appeared on the screen during the show. The translated scripts
when speakers switched to English or the advertising signs during the break time and
before the performance, might have a stronger presence of English. They were
57
7. References
Akande, A. (2013). Code-switching in Nigerian Hip-hop Lyrics. Language Matter:
Studies in the Languages of Africa, 44 (1), 39-57.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2007). Bilingualism in the Mass Media and on the Internet. In M.
Heller, Bilingualism: A Social Approach (pp. 207-230). Toronto: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2009). Language and the Three Spheres of Hip Hop. In H. Alim,
A. Ibrahim, & A. Pennycook, Global Linguistic Flows Hip Hop Cultures, Youth
Identities, and the Politics of Language (pp. 43-62). Taylor & Francis.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2010). Multilingualism, Ethnicity and Genre in Germany’s
Migrant Hip Hop. In M. Terkourafi, The Language of Global Hip-Hop (pp. 19-
43). London: Continuum .
Appel, René and Muysken, Pieter C. (1987). Language Contact and Bilingualism.
London: Edward Arnold.
Auer, P. (1984). Bilingual Conversation. Antwerp: John Benjamins.
Auer, Peter; Couper-Kühlen, Elizabeth; and Müller, Frank . (1999). Language in Time:
The Rhythm and Tempo of Spoken Interaction. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Babalola, E. Taiwo and Taiwo, Rotimi. (2009). Code-switching in Contemporary
Nigerian Hip-hop Music. Itupale Online Journal of African Studies, 1, 1-26.
Bailey, B. (1999). Switching. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9 (1-2), 241-243.
Bassiouney, R. (2012). Politicizing identity: Code choice and stance-taking during the
Egyptian revolution. Discourse & Society, 23 (2), 107-126.
Blom, Jan-Petter and Gumperz, John. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structure:
code-switching in Norway. In J. Gumperz, & J.-P. Blom, Directions in
Sociolinguistics. The Ethnography of Communication (pp. 407-434). New York:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Brunstad, Endre; Røyneland, Unn; and Opsahl, Toril. (2010). Hip Hop, Ethnicity and
Linguistic Practice in Rural and Urban Norway. In M. Terkourafi, The
Language of Global Hip-hop (pp. 223-255). London: Continuum.
59
Bucholtz, Mary; and Lopez, Qiuana. (2011). Performing blackness, forming whiteness:
Linguistic minstrelsy in Hollywood films. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15 (5),
680–706.
Clift, R. (2016). Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cutler, C. (2003). "Keepin' It Real": White Hip-Hoppers' Discourses of Language,
Race, and Authenticity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 13 (2), 211-233.
Dao, T. (2019). A Study on English-Vietnamese Code-Mixing in VNexpress Online
Newspaper. Gyeongsang National University (pp. 29-51). Jinju: Contemporary
English-American Language and Literature Society.
Davies, Eirlys E. and Bentahila, Abdelali. (2006). Code switching and the globalisation
of popular music: The case of North African rai and rap. Multilingua, 25 (4),
367-392.
Denham, P. A. (1992). English in Vietnam. World Englishes, 11 (1), 61-69.
Do, H. T. (1996). Foreign Language Education Policy in Vietnam: The Emergence of
English and Its Impact on Higher Education. Los Angeles: University of
Southern California.
Doan, T. N. (2018, June 26). Medium. Retrieved from Rap/Hip-Hop: the Rising of
Underground Music and Youth Culture in Vietnam:
https://medium.com/@namphuongthidoan/rap-hip-hop-the-rising-of-
underground-music-and-youth-culture-in-vietnam-45b4526d9682
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). In R. Englebretson, Stancetaking in Discourse. Subjectivity,
evaluation, interaction (pp. 139-182). John Benjamins B. V.
Eberhardt, Maeve and Freeman, Kara. (2015). ‘First things first, I’m the realest’:
Linguistic appropriation, white privilege, and the hip-hop persona of Iggy
Azalea. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(3), 303–327.
Edwards, W. F. (1995). Reviewed Work(s): Social Motivations for Codeswitching.
Evidence from Africa by Carol Myers-Scotton. Language in Society, 24 (2),
302-305.
Giles, Howard; Coupland, Nikolas; and Coupland, Justine. (1991). Accommodation
theory: communication, context and consequence. In N. Coupland, J. Coupland,
& H. Giles, Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied
Sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60
Lanca, J. (2008). Subculture in Hanoi – Different from the West, Different from the
Rest. The Pacific Geographies (PG), 29.
Le, P. H. (2017). Code-switching in Digital Communication: A Case Study of Senior
Students of English Majors. Hanoi: University of Languages and International
Studies.
Lee, J. S. (2010). Glocalizing Keepin' it Real: South Korean Hip-Hop Playas. In M.
Terkourafi, The languages of global hip-hop (pp. 139-161). London :
Continuum.
Ministry of Education and Training. (2006). A Scheme for Foreign Language Education
in the Vietnamese Educational System for the 2006–2010 Period. Hanoi.
Ministry of Education and Training. (2010, 08 12). The Pilot Primary Curriculum.
Retrieved from Portal of Ministry of Education and Training:
https://moet.gov.vn/van-ban/vbdh/Pages/chi-tiet-van-ban.aspx?ItemID=1894
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018, 12 26). Circular of General Educational
Curriculum. Retrieved from Portal of the Ministry of Education and Training:
https://moet.gov.vn/van-ban/vanban/Pages/chi-tiet-van-ban.aspx?ItemID=1301
Mitchell, T. (2001). Introduction: Another Root - Hip hop outside the USA. In T.
Mitchell, Global noise : rap and hip-hop outside the USA (pp. 1-38).
Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press.
Morgan, M. H. (2001). Grammar and language ideology in Hip Hop identity . In S. L.
Lanehart, Sociocultural and Historical Contexts of African American English
(pp. 187-210). Georgia: John Benjamins .
Morgan, M. H. (2001). “Nuthin’ but a G thang’’: Grammar and language ideology in
Hip Hop identity. In S. L. Lanehart, Sociocultural and Historical Contexts of
African American English (pp. 187-210). Georgia, US: John Benjamins.
Morgan, M. H. (2005). After ... word! The philosophy of the hip-hop battle. In D.
Darby, & T. Shelby, Hip Hop & Philosophy: Rhyme 2 Reason (pp. 205-212).
Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company.
Myers-Scotton, C. (1993). A markedness Model of Codeswitching. In C. Myers-
Scotton, Social Motivations For Codeswitching. Evidence from Africa (pp. 113-
150). New York: Oxford.
62
Wei, L. (1998). The 'Why' and 'How' Questions in The Analysis of Conversational
Code-Switching. In P. Auer, Code-Switching in Conversation (pp. 156-179). London &
New York: Routledge.
66
Plagiarism Declaration
I declare and confirm that this Paper is my own work and was written without help or any aids
other than those specified therein. I also affirm that all text passages, drawings, sketches,
illustrations, and similar that were taken from other works and quoted either literally or
correspondingly have been identified as such. I declare and confirm that this Paper has not been
submitted in this or any other form to any institution in the context of examination
requirements.
I understand that plagiarism is wrong and that it can take different forms, some direct and some
indirect.
I also understand that plagiarism in any assignment (essay, project or thesis) will result in a
greatly reduced mark, rejection of the paper entirely or a failed course.