CENGR511 – Hydrology 1

MODULE NO. 3
CHAPTER 3
INFILTRATION

Learning Objectives:

1. Discuss the concept of Infiltration

2. Explain the Infiltration Capacity

3. Discuss how to measure Infiltration.

4. Discuss how to model Infiltration using different equations.

5. Explain how to determine the parameters in Infiltration.

6. Solve problems in Infiltration.

OVERVIEW
Infiltration is defined as the flow of water from aboveground into the subsurface. The topic of
infiltration has received a great deal of attention because of its importance to topics as widely
ranging as irrigation, contaminant transport, groundwater recharge, and ecosystem viability. More
generally, a quantitative understanding of this process is vital to our ability to relate surface and
subsurface processes in describing the hydrologic cycle.
While the definition of infiltration is simple, it can involve all aspects of flow through a
variably saturated porous medium, ranging in complexity from steady-state, saturated flow in a
homogeneous, isotropic medium to transient, unstable, unsaturated flow through an anisotropic,
heterogeneous medium. The rate and pattern of infiltration vary with the distribution and rate with
which water is supplied at the ground surface, the depth of the water table, the hydraulic properties
of the subsurface materials, and the antecedent moisture content distribution. The following
discussion focuses on infiltration into a homogeneous, isotropic medium as a basis for
understanding the infiltration process.

INFILTRATION
Infiltration is the flow of water into the ground through the soil surface. The distribution
of soil moisture within the soil profile during the infiltration process is illustrated in Figure 3.1.
When water is applied at the surface of a soil, four moisture zones in the soil, as indicated in
Figure 3.1 can be identified.

Zone 1: At the top, a thin layer of saturated zone is created.

Zone 2: Beneath zone 1, there is a transition zone.
Zone 3: Next lower zone is the transmission zone where the downward motion of the moisture
takes place. The moisture content in this zone is above field capacity but below saturation.
Further, it is characterized by unsaturated flow and fairly uniform moisture content.
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 2

Zone 4: The last zone is the wetting zone. The soil moisture in this zone will be at or near field
capacity and the moisture content decrease with the depth. The boundary of the wetting zone is
the wetting front where a sharp discontinuity exists between the newly wet soil and original
moisture content of the soil. Depending upon the amount of infiltration and physical properties
of the soil, the wetting front can extend from a few centimeters to meters.

Figure 3.1. Distribution of Soil Moisture in the Infiltration Process

The infiltration process can be easily understood through a simple analogy. Consider a small
container covered with wire gauze as in Figure 3.2.

Figure 3.2. An analogy of Infiltration

If water is poured into the container a part of it will go into the container and a part
overflow. Further, the container can hold only a fixed quantity and when it is full no more flow
into the container can take place. While this analogy is highly simplified, it underscores two
important aspects; viz. (i) the maximum rate at which the ground can absorb water, the infiltration
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 3

capacity and (ii) the volume of water that the ground can hold, the field capacity. Since the
infiltered water may contribute to the ground water discharge in addition to increasing the soil
moisture, the process can be schematically modelled as in Figure 3.3, (a) and (b) wherein two
situations, viz. low intensity rainfall and high intensity rainfall are considered.

Figure 3.3. An Infiltration Model

INFILTRATION CAPACITY
The maximum rate at which a given soil at a given time can absorb water is defined as the
infiltration capacity. It is designated as fp and is expressed in units of cm/h. The actual rate of
infiltration f can be expressed as

f = fp when i ≥ fp
f = i when i < fp (3.1)

where i = intensity of rainfall. The infiltration capacity of a soil is high at the beginning of a storm
and has an exponential decay as the time elapses.

The typical variation of the infiltration capacity fp of a soil with time is shown in Figure
3.4. The infiltration capacity of an area is dependent on a large number of factors, chief of them
are:

• Characteristics of the soil (Texture, porosity and hydraulic conductivity)

• Condition of the soil surface
• Current moisture content
• Vegetative cover
• Soil temperature
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 4

Figure 3.4. Variation of Infiltration Capacity

a. Characteristics of Soil
The type of soil, viz. sand, silt or clay, its texture, structure, permeability and
underdrainage are the important characteristics under this category. A loose, permeable, sandy
soil will have a larger infiltration capacity than a tight, clayey soil. A soil with good underdrain-
age, i.e., the facility to transmit the infiltered water downward to a groundwater storage would
obviously have a higher infiltration capacity. When the soils occur in layers, the transmission
capacity of the layers determines the overall infiltration rate. Also, a dry soil can absorb more
water than one whose pores are already full. The land use has a significant influence on fp. For
example, a forest soil rich in organic matter will have a much higher value of fp under identical
conditions than the same soil in an urban area where it is subjected to compaction.

b. Surface of Entry
At the soil surface, the impact of raindrops causes the fines in the soil to be displaced and
these in turn can clog the pore spaces in the upper layers of the soil. This is an important factor
affecting the infiltration capacity. Thus, a surface covered with grass and other vegetation which
can reduce this process has a pronounced influence on the value of fp .

c. Fluid Characteristics
Water infiltrating into the soil will have many impurities, both in solution and in
suspension. The turbidity of the water, especially the clay and colloid content is an important
factor and such suspended particles block the fine pores in the soil and reduce its infiltration
capacity. The temperature of the water is a factor in the sense that it affects the viscosity of the
water by which in turn affects the infiltration rate. Contamination of the water by dissolved salts
can affect the soil structure and in turn affect the infiltration rate.
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 5

MEASUREMENT OF INFILTRATION
Infiltration characteristics of a soil at a given location can be estimated by
• Using flooding type infiltrometers
• Measurement of subsidence of free water in a large basin or pond
• Rainfall simulator
• Hydrograph analysis

a. Flooding Type Infiltrometers

Flooding-type infiltrometers are experimental devices used to obtain data relating to
variation of infiltration capacity with time. Two types of flooding type infiltrometers are in
common use. These are (a) Tube-type (or Simple) infiltrometer and (b) Double-ring infiltrometer.

a.1. Simple (Tube Type) Infiltrometer

This is a simple instrument consisting essentially of a metal cylinder, 30 cm diameter and
60 cm long, open at both ends. The cylinder is driven into the ground to a depth of 50 cm, Figure
3.5.(a). Water is poured into the top part to a depth of 5 cm and a pointer is set to mark the water
level. As infiltration proceeds, the volume is made up by adding water from a burette to keep the
water level at the tip of the pointer. Knowing the volume of water added during different time
intervals, the plot of the infiltration capacity vs time is obtained. The experiments are continued
till a uniform rate of infiltration is obtained and this may take 2-3 hours. The surface of the soil
is usually protected by a perforated disc to prevent formation of turbidity and its settling on the
soil surface.

A major objection to the simple infiltrometer as above is that the infiltered water spreads
at the outlet from the tube (as shown by dotted lines in Figure 3.5.(a)) and as such the tube area
is not representative of the area in which infiltration is taking place.

Figure 3.5. Flooding Type Infiltrometers

a.2. Double-Ring Infiltrometer

This most commonly used infiltrometer is de- signed to overcome the basic objection of
the tube infiltrometer, viz. the tube area is not representative of the infiltrating area. In this, two
sets of concentrating rings with diameters of 30 cm and 60 cm and of a minimum length of 25
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 6

cm, as shown in Figure 3.5(b), are used. The two rings are inserted into the ground and water is
applied into both the rings to maintain a constant depth of about 5.0 cm. The outer ring pro- vides
water jacket to the infiltering water from the inner ring and hence prevents the spreading out of
the infiltering water of the inner ring. The water depths in the inner and outer rings are kept the
same during the observation period. The measurement of the water volume is done on the inner
ring only. The experiment is carried out till a constant infiltration rate is obtained. A perforated
disc to prevent formation of turbidity and settling of fines on the soil surface is provided on the
surface of the soil in the inner ring as well as in the annular space.

b. Rainfall Simulator
In this a small plot of land, of about 2 m x 4 m size, is provided with a series of nozzles
on the longer side with arrangements to collect and measure the surface runoff rate. The specially
designed nozzles produce raindrops falling from a height of 2 m and are capable of producing
various intensities of rainfall. Experiments are conducted under controlled conditions with
various combinations of intensities and durations and the surface runoff rates and volumes are
measured in each case. Using the water budget equation involving the volume of rainfall,
infiltration and runoff, the infiltration rate and its variation with time are estimated. If the rainfall
intensity is higher than the infiltration rate, infiltration capacity values are obtained. Rainfall
simulator type infiltrometers give lower values than flooding type infiltrometers. This is due to
effect of the rainfall impact and turbidity of the surface water present in the former.

c. Hydrograph Analysis
Reasonable estimation of the infiltration capacity of a small watershed can be obtained by
analyzing measured runoff hydrographs and corresponding rainfall records. If sufficiently good
rainfall records and runoff hydrographs corresponding to isolated storms in a small watershed
with fairly homogeneous soils are available, water budget equation can be applied to estimate the
abstraction by infiltration. In this the evapotranspiration losses are estimated by knowing the land
cover/use of the watershed.

MODELING INFILTRATION CAPACITY

Figure 3.6 shows a typical variation of infiltration capacity fp with time.

Figure 3.6. Curves of Infiltration Capacity and Cumulative Infiltration Capacity

 CENGR511 – Hydrology 7

Cumulative infiltration capacity Fp (t) is defined as the accumulation of infiltration

volume over a time period since the start of the process and is given by
t
Fp = ∫0 fp (t) dt (3.2a)

Thus, the curve Fp (t) vs time in Figure 3.6 is the mass curve of infiltration. It may be
noted that from Eq. (3.2-a) it follows that
dFp (t)
fp ( t) = (3.2b)
dt

Many equations have been proposed to express the curves fp (t) or Fp (t) for use in
hydrological analysis. In this section four such equations will be described.

a. Horton’s Equation (1993)

Horton expressed the decay of infiltration capacity with time as an exponential decay
given by

fp = fc + (fo - fc )e-Kht for 0 ≥ t ≤ tc (3.3)

where:
fp = infiltration capacity at any time t from the start of the rainfall
f0 = initial infiltration capacity at t = 0
fc = final capacity/final steady state infiltration capacity occurring at t = tc . Also,
fc is sometimes known as constant rate or ultimate infiltration capacity.
Kh = Horton's decay coefficient which depends upon soil characteristics and
vegetation cover. (hr-1 )

The difficulty of determining the variation of the three parameters f0 , fc , and Kh with soil
characteristics and antecedent moisture conditions preclude the general use of Eq. 3.3.

b. Philip’s Equation (1957)

Philip's two term model relates Fp (t) as

Fp = st1/2 +Kt (3.4)

where:
s = a function of soil suction potential and called as sorptivity
K = Darcy's hydraulic conductivity

By Eq. (3.2-b) infiltration capacity could be expressed as

𝟏 1/2
fp = st +K (3.5)
𝟐
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 8

c. Kostiakov Equation (1932)

Kostiakov model expresses cumulative infiltration capacity as

Fp = atb (3.6)

where a and b are local parameters with a > 0 and 0 < b < 1.
The infiltration capacity would now be expressed by Eq. (3.2-b) as

fp =(ab)t(b-1) (3.7)

d. Green-Ampt Equation (1911)

Green and Ampt proposed a model for infiltration capacity based on Darcy's law as

ηSc
fp = K (1+ Fp
) (3.8)

where:
η = porosity of the soil
Sc = capillary suction at the wetting front and
K = Darcy's hydraulic conductivity

Eq. 3.8 could be considered as

n
fp = m + (3.9)
Fp

where m and n are Green-Ampt parameters of infiltration model.

ESTIMATION OF PARAMETERS OF INFILTRATION MODELS

Data from infiltrometer experiments can be processed to generate data sets fp and Fp
values for various time t values. The following procedures are convenient to evaluate the
parameters of the infiltration models.

a. Horton’s Model
Value of fc in a test is obtained from inspection of the data. Equation (3.3) is rearranged
to read as

(fp - fc ) = (fo - fc )e-Kht (3.3a)

• Taking logarithms ln(fp - fc ) = ln(fo - fc )e-Kh t

• Plot ln(fp - fc ) against t and fit the best straight line through the plotted points.
• The intercept gives ln((fo - fc ) and the slope of the straight line is Kh .
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 9

b. Philip’s Model
Use the expression for fp as

𝟏 1/2
fp = st + K (3.10)
𝟐
• Plot the observed values of fp against t-1/2 on an arithmetic graph paper.
• The best fitting straight line through the plotted points gives K as the intercept and (s/2)
as the slope of the line.
• While fitting Philip's model it is necessary to note that K is positive and to achieve this
it may be necessary to neglect a few data points at the initial stages (viz. at small values
of t) of the infiltration experiment.
• K will be of the order of magnitude of the asymptotic value of fp .

c. Kostiakov Model
Kostiakov model relates Fp to t as
Fp = atb (3.11)

• Taking logarithms of both sides of Eq. (3.11),

ln(Fp )= ln(a) + b ln(t)

• The data is plotted as ln(Fp ) vs ln(t) on an arithmetic graph paper and the best fit straight
through the plotted points gives ln a as intercept and the slope is b.
• Note that b is a positive quantity such that O < b < 1.

d. Green-Ampt Model
n
• Green-Ampt equation is considered in the form fp = m + .
Fp
• Values of fp are plotted against (1/Fp ) on a simple arithmetic graph paper and the Fp best
fit straight line is drawn through the plotted points.
• The intercept and the slope of the line are the coefficients m and n respectively.
• Sometimes values of fp and corresponding Fp at very low values of t may have to be
omitted to get best fitting straight line with reasonably good correlation coefficient.
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 10

Sample Problem No. 1

The initial infiltration capacity fo of a watershed is estimated as 1.5 in/hr and the time
constant is taken to be 0.35 hr-1 . The equilibrium capacity fc is 0.2 in/hr. use Horton’s equation
to find (a) the values of fp at t = 10 min, 30 min, 1 hr, 2 hr, and 6 hr, and (b) the total volume of
infiltration over the 6-hr period.

Solution:
From the Eq. (3.3)

fp = fc + (fo - fc )e-Kh t

Substitute the values for fo , fc and k gives,

fp = 0.2 in/hr + (1.5 in/hr - 0.2 in/hr)e-0.35t

fp = 0.2 in/hr + 1.3in/hr(e-0.35t )

Solving for each value of t gives the following:

a. t = 10 min or 1/6 hr

fp = 0.2 in/hr + 1.3in/hr(e-0.35(1/6) )

fp = 1.43 in/hr

b. t = 30 min or 1/2 hr

fp = 0.2 in/hr + 1.3in/hr(e-0.35(1/2) )

fp = 1.29 in/hr

c. t = 1 hr

fp = 0.2 in/hr + 1.3in/hr(e-0.35(1) )

fp = 1.12 in/hr

d. t = 2 hr

fp = 0.2 in/hr + 1.3in/hr(e-0.35(2) )

fp = 0.85 in/hr

e. t = 6 hr
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 11

fp = 0.2 in/hr + 1.3in/hr(e-0.35(6) )

fp = 0.36 in/hr

t(hr) fp (in/hr)
1/6 1.43
1/2 1.29
1 1.12
2 0.85
6 0.36

The volume (in inches over the watershed) can be found by plotting the curve given by
the table of values and then finding the are under the curve bounded by t = 0 and t = 6. The plot
is shown below. The curve is given by the equation below, and to find Fp ', the volume of
infiltration and the area under the F curve, we must integrate Horton’s equation.

(fo - fc )e-Kht
Fp '= fc t +
-k

fp = 0.2 in/hr + 1.3in/hr(e-0.35t )

Integrating over the interval t = 0 to t = 6 hr gives,

Vol = ∫ f dt
= ∫ 0.2 + 1.3(e-0.35t)dt
1.3 6
= [0.2t+ (-0.35) e-0.35t ]
0
Vol = 4.46 in. over the watershed Ans.
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 12

Sample Problem No. 2

Infiltration capacity data obtained in a flooding type infiltration test is given below:

a. For this data, plot the curves of

(i) infiltration capacity/rate vs time,
(ii) infiltration capacity vs cumulative infiltration
(iii) cumulative infiltration vs time

b. Obtain the best values of the parameters in Horton's infiltration capacity equation to represent
this data set.

Solution:
Incremental infiltration values and corresponding infiltration intensities fp at various data
observation times are calculated as shown in the following Tables.

Column 1: Time since start (in minutes)

Column 2: Cumulative Infiltration Depth (in cm)

Column 3: Incremental depth in the interval (cm)

At the starting time of 5 minutes,
= 1.75 (encircled in red) – 0 (encircled in yellow)
= 1.75 (encircled in blue)

At 10 minutes,
= 3.00 – 1.75
= 1.25

At 15 minutes,
= 3.95 – 3.00
= 0.95 ..and so on.
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 13

Time in Cum. Incremental Infiltration ln (fp - fc) Time in

Minutes Depth, Depth in the rate, hours
Fp (cm) interval (cm) fp(cm/h)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

0 0
5 1.75 1.75
10 3.00 1.25
15 3.95 0.95
25 5.50 1.55
45. 7.25 1.75
60 8.30 1.05
75 9.30 1.00
90 10.20 0.90
110 11.28 1.08
130 12.36 1.08

Column 4: Infiltration rate, fp (cm/hr)

Cumulative Depth (cm)

Time (hr)

At the starting time of 5 minutes,

Incremental Depth (cm)

= Interval Time (hr)
1.75 cm
= 1 hr
(5 min - 0 min)( )
60 min
= 21.0

At 10 minutes,
1.25 cm
= 1 hr
(10 min - 5 min)( )
60 min
= 15.0

At 15 minutes,
0.95 cm
= 1 hr
(15 min - 10 min)( )
60 min
= 11.4
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 14

Time in Cum. Incremental Infiltration ln (fp - fc) Time in

Minutes Depth, Depth in the rate, hours
Fp (cm) interval (cm) fp(cm/h)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

0
5 1.75 1.75 21.0
10 3.00 1.25 15.0
15 3.95 0.95 11.4
25 5.50 1.55 9.30
45. 7.25 1.75 5.2
60 8.30 1.05 5
75 9.30 1.00 4.2
90 10.20 0.90 0
11.28 1.08 4.0
110
12.36 1.08 0
130
3.6
0
3.2
4
3.2
4
Column 5: ln (fp - fc)

At the starting time of 5 minutes,

= ln(21.0-3.24 (encircled in blue))
= 2.877

At 10 minutes,
= ln(15.0-3.24)
= 2.465 …..and so on

Note: In Column 5, fc is the value of final capacity or when the capacity became constant.
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 15

Time in Cum. Incremental Infiltration ln (fp - fc) Time in

Minutes Depth, Depth in the rate, hours
Fp (cm) interval (cm) fp(cm/h)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

0
5 1.75 1.75 21.0 2.877
10 3.00 1.25 15.0 2.465
15 3.95 0.95 11.4 2.099
25 5.50 1.55 9.30 1.802
45. 7.25 1.75 5.2 0.698
60 8.30 1.05 5 -0.041
75 9.30 1.00 4.2 -0.274
90 10.20 0.90 0 -1.022
11.28 1.08 4.0
110
12.36 1.08 0
130
3.6
0
3.2
Column 6: Time in hours 4
Convert Column 1, minute to hour. 3.2
4

Time in Cum. Incremental Infiltration ln (fp - fc) Time in

Minutes Depth, Depth in the rate, hours
Fp (cm) interval (cm) f p(cm/h)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)

0
5 1.75 1.75 21.0 2.877 0.083
10 3.00 1.25 15.0 2.465 0.167
15 3.95 0.95 11.4 2.099 0.250
25 5.50 1.55 9.30 1.802 0.417
45. 7.25 1.75 5.2 0.698 0.750
60 8.30 1.05 5 -0.041 1.000
75 9.30 1.00 4.2 -0.274 1.250
90 10.20 0.90 0 -1.022 1.500
11.28 1.08 4.0 1.833
110
12.36 1.08 0 2.167
130
3.6
0
3.2
4
3.2
4
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 16

a. Plot the curve

(i) infiltration capacity/rate vs time, fp vs time

25

20
Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)

15

10

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Time (hr)

Chart 1. Plot of fp vs time

(ii) infiltration capacity/rate vs cumulative depth of infiltration

25
fp = Infiltration Rate (cm/hr)

20

15

10

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Fp = Cumulative Depth of Infiltration (cm)

Chart 2. Plot of fp vs Fp
 CENGR511 – Hydrology 17

(iii) cumulative depth of infiltration vs time

14
Fp = Cumulative Depth of Infiltration
12

10

8
(cm)

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Time (hr)

Chart 3. Plot of Fp vs Time

b. Obtain the best values of the parameters in Horton's infiltration capacity equation to represent
this data set.

1
ln (fp - fc)

0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
-1
y = -2.6754x + 2.8871
-2 R² = 0.9859

-3

-4
TIME (HR)

Chart 4. Horton’s Equation. Plot of ln (fp - fc) vs Time

 CENGR511 – Hydrology 18

The broken line shown (Chart 4) interpret as the best fitted line. Equation of the line can
be obtained by plotting the chart in Excel for accuracy or you can solve it manually. Refer to
figure below.

From the estimation of parameters of infiltration models,

• The intercept gives ln((fo - fc ) and the slope of the straight line is Kh .

Equation of the line: y = -2.6754t+ 2.8871

2.8871 – intercept
-2.6754 – slope of the line

Therefore,

ln((fp - fc ) = 2.8871 - -2.6754 t

-Kh = slope of the best fit line

= -2.6754
Kh = -2.6754h-

ln((fo - fc ) = intercept
ln((fo - fc ) = 2.8871
fo - fc = 17.936
fo - 3.24 = 17.936
fo = 14. 696 cm/hr Ans.