Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0263876219300218 Main1
1 s2.0 S0263876219300218 Main1
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Carbon dioxide (CO2 ) considerably contributes to the greenhouse effects and consequently,
Received 9 May 2018 to the global warming. Thus, reduction of CO2 emissions/concentration in the atmosphere is
Received in revised form 22 an important goal for various industrial and environmental sectors. In this research work, we
December 2018 study CO2 capture by its absorption in mixtures of water and piperazine (PZ). Experimental
Accepted 21 January 2019 techniques to obtain the equilibrium data are usually costly and time consuming. Ther-
Available online 29 January 2019 modynamic modeling by Equations of State (EOSs) and connectionist tools leads to more
reliable and accurate results, compared to the empirical models and analytical modeling
Keywords: strategies. This research work utilizes Genetic Programming (GP) and Genetic Algorithm-
CO2 absorption Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (GA-ANFIS) to estimate the solubility of CO2 in
Piperazine mixtures of water and piperazine (PZ). In both methods, the input parameters are temper-
Solubility ature, partial pressure of CO2 , and concentration of PZ in the solution. A total number of
Deterministic tools 390 data points is collected from the literature and used to develop GP and GA-ANFIS mod-
Accuracy els. Assessing the models by the statistical methods, both models are found to acceptably
Environmental implication predict the CO2 solubility in water/PZ mixtures. However, the GP exhibits a superior perfor-
mance, compared to GA-ANFIS; the values of Average Absolute Relative Error (AARD) are
5.3213% and 9.7143% for the GP and GA-ANFIS models, respectively. Such reliable predictive
tools can assist engineers and researchers to effectively determine the key thermodynamic
properties (e.g., solubility, vapor pressure, and compressibility factor) which are central to
design and operation of the carbon capture processes in a variety of chemical plants such
as power plants and refineries.
© 2019 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction leading to acid rains and global warming. Water, methane, nitrous
oxide, and ozone are other greenhouse gases found in the atmosphere
Although fossil fuels such as coal and petroleum are used as the (Crutzen et al., 2016; Wallington et al., 2009). The combustion of fos-
main sources of energy supply, they raise environmental concerns. For sil fuels, destruction of forests, use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in
instance, burning fossil fuels emits carbon monoxide (CO), carbon diox- refrigeration systems, and utilization of CFCs and halons in firefight-
ide (CO2 ), and potentially a small amount of hydrogen sulfide (H2 S), ing systems increase the concentration of greenhouse gases in the
∗
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: szendehboudi@mun.ca (S. Zendehboudi).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.01.019
0263-8762/© 2019 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
406 Chemical Engineering Research and Design 1 4 4 ( 2 0 1 9 ) 405–417
ity, and heat of absorption are increased by adding PZ to the 1, where j = 1, node i refers to an adaptive node with the input
amine gas purification solvents (Lepaumier et al., 2009; Li et al., of x (or y). Ai (or Bi−2 ) represents a linguistic label attributed
2013). The absorption processes with the amine solutions are to this node. Hence, the membership function for this node is
usually conducted at the temperature range of 45 ◦ C–55 ◦ C. expressed as follows:
The carbon capture capacity of the PZ is significant at this
temperature condition. PZ is distilled and recycled to the pro- O1i = Ai (x) , i = 1, 2 (1)
cess after the flash distillation at temperatures up to 150 ◦ C.
PZ is a cyclic diamine, which is promising in absorbing CO2 or
due to the rapid formation of CO2 from carbonates (Freeman
et al., 2010b; Rochelle et al., 2011). The amine groups on the PZ O1i = Bi−2 (y) , i = 3, 4 (2)
molecule promptly react with CO2 to create the PZ carbamate
(at the reduced loading) and PZ bicarbamate at an opera- Thus, O1i denotes the membership function of a fuzzy set A
tional condition of 0.31–0.41 mol CO2 /equiv PZ, improving the (A1 , A2 , B1 , or B2 ) and it determines the level to which the input
rate of CO2 solubility. As a result, there is not a significant x (or y) correlates to the quantifier A. The Membership Func-
amount of free PZ in the solvent that causes a reduction in tions (MFs) for A and B can be represented by the generalized
the volatility and precipitation rates through formation of bell functions, as given below:
PZ.6H2 O (Rochelle et al., 2011). Concentrated piperazine (CPZ)
is a novel absorbent that has a higher CO2 absorption capacity, 1
Ai (x) = x−r 2q (3)
compared to MEA (Freeman et al., 2010b). CPZ is more reac- 1+ p i i
i
tive and thermally more stable (compared to MEA), which is
expected to reduce the capital and operation costs of the CO2 In Eq. (3), pi , qi , and ri resemble the parameter sets. Through
capture based on the CSIRO pilot plant tests (Cottrell et al., changing these parameters, the function shape is altered. In
2013; Li et al., 2013). the next layer, where j = 2, the inputs are multiplied using the
nodes such that their product is expressed by the following
3. Mathematical modeling approach relationship:
Model selection is normally based on the knowledge about the O2i = wi Ai (x) Bi (y) , i = 1, 2 (4)
problem and set objectives. There are advantages and draw-
backs with any model (Rodrigues and Minceva, 2005). Physical Every node product demonstrates the rules firing strength.
and chemical phenomena/behaviors to describe the process In layer 3, which is called the normalization layer, the ratio of
form the foundations of theoretical models. In general, the firing strength of node i to sum of all rules’ firing strengths is
main governing equations to simulate the process behav- calculated as follows:
iors are obtained from the conservation laws of momentum, wi
mass, and energy. The complex (and nonlinear) mathemati- O3i = w̄i = , i = 1, 2 (5)
w1 + w2
cal algebraic equations need proper tools to attain solutions.
A majority of the solution methods may encounter serious In layer 4, node i calculates the portion of the ith rule to the
issues such as lack of proper curve fitting and convergence. total output as given below:
Artificial Intelligence (AI) models have a capability to offer
effective models when they learn and simulate processes O4i = w̄i zi = w̄i (ai x + bi y + ci ) , i = 1, 2 (6)
(Zendehboudi et al., 2018; Kamari et al., 2015a,b; Chamkalani
et al., 2014). They appear to be a good choice when it is difficult in which, w̄i denotes the normalized firing strength (layer 3
to find physical or chemical concepts/phenomena to describe output) and ai , bi , and ci represent the set of parameters, which
a system, or when the model formulation is not feasible by are called the consequent parameters.
existing knowledge, experience, and data. Previous studies In layer 5, the ultimate output is computed by summation
show high capabilities of ANN approaches to obtain appro- of the entire incoming signals in a node as follows:
priate formulations and solutions for complex and nonlinear
systems/ problems (Azizi et al., 2017; Zendehboudi et al., 2018). wi zi
In this section, the modeling tools are briefly described.
i
O5i = w̄i zi = (7)
i wi
3.1. Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) i
The modeling approach of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference In this study, the GA approach is applied to optimize the
System (ANFIS) was initially proposed by Jang (1993); it values of the membership function variables in the ANFIS
hybridizes ANN and Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) to compen- algorithm.
sate for the drawbacks of the stand-alone ANN and FIS models.
ANFIS is a class of adaptive multi-layer feed forward network 3.2. Genetic algorithm
that is used to forecast the target parameters in nonlinear sys-
tems (Ying and Pan, 2008). Given its structure comprises of The concept and capability of Genetic Algorithm (GA) in solv-
nodes formed in five different layers (Yun et al., 2008), ANFIS ing the science and engineering optimization problems were
is a fuzzy logic-based model with the fuzzy rules, which are first explored by John Holland in 1975. More applications of the
obtained during the training step (Kamari et al., 2015a). Each GA were discussed in several research studies (Houck et al.,
node is described by its membership function. The output 1995). Generic Algorithm (GA) finds the best criteria for the fit-
j
from the ith node of layer j is shown by Oi . For instance, in layer ness function. The algorithm is made of chromosomes, which
Chemical Engineering Research and Design 1 4 4 ( 2 0 1 9 ) 405–417 409
are the strings of genes. The optimal criteria in GA are obtained dard Deviation (STD), and Mean Squared Error (MSE) to check
through the fitness functions that can be either maximized the reliability of the GP and GA-ANFIS models. The definitions
or minimized. The genetic operators are subsequently repro- of these statistical criteria are given below (Arabloo et al., 2015;
duced, mutated, migrated, and crossed over, starting from an Ghiasi et al., 2014).
initial population of chromosomes to upgrade their quality.
The single point and matrix crossover are the common oper-
1 exp
n
2
ators in the GA (Goldberg, 1989). MSE = yi − ysim
i
(8)
n
i=1
4. Data acquisition and analysis First, the ANFIS model whose structure is optimized by GA
is developed. The maximum number of generations, size of
The accuracy, robustness, and reliability of any model have to population, mutation (%), crossover (%), selection pressure,
be checked with the actual data and behavior trends through and mutation rate are the parameters of the GA algorithm for
®
employing statistical tools (Dadkhah et al., 2017; Nasery et al., which their optimal values are determined. We use MATLAB
2016; Tatar et al., 2016b; Kamari et al., 2014a,b,c). For each to develop the GA-ANFIS model. The GA role is to effectively
model, there are always independent input parameters that relate the model inputs to the output through a proper opti-
considerably influence the output parameter(s). In our study, mization scheme. Finding the optimal parameters of the GA
temperature, partial pressure of CO2 , and concentration of PZ is vital in the development of a robust smart model. Trial and
are considered as the independent input parameters and the error procedure is employed to tune the GA parameters. The
CO2 solubility in aqueous PZ solution, which is defined as mole GA is also used to optimize the ANFIS structure, as depicted
CO2 /mole PZ, is an output parameter. In data selection pro- in Fig. 3.
cess, it is important to have reliable data points to train and Temperature (in K), partial pressure of CO2 (in kPa), and
to evaluate the model. We gathered 390 experimental data for the PZ concentration (in mol/L) are considered as impor-
the solubility of CO2 in PZ solution from the previously pub- tant factors, affecting the solubility of CO2 in the PZ/H2 O
lished works, as listed in Table 1 (Bishnoi and Rochelle, 2000; solutions. The MFs in the fuzzy sub-domain are of general-
Dash et al., 2011a; Derks et al., 2005). Data points are randomly ized Gaussian type, as recommended by the previous studies
divided into two categories such that 70% are used at the train- (Ganjidoost et al., 2016; Ghasemi et al., 2016; Ghiasi et al., 2016;
ing stage and the remaining data points are utilized at the Hasanipanah et al., 2016; Tatar et al., 2016a, c). The GA-ANFIS
testing phase. related MFs for estimation of solubility of CO2 in solutions of
In the training stage, the model is developed and in the PZ/H2 O are illustrated in Fig. 4. Table 2 also lists the properties
testing stage, its performance is evaluated with quantifying of the GA-ANFIS model used for determination of CO2 solubil-
the objective function(s). To check the model reliability, a para- ity in the solutions. According to Table 2, the optimal values of
metric sensitivity analysis is conducted. In this research work, the maximum generation number, maximum population size,
we use four statistical parameters including Average Absolute mutation (%), crossover (%), selection pressure, and mutation
Relative Error (AARD), coefficient of determination (R2 ), Stan- rate are obtained at 100, 1000, 0.7, 0.65, 8, and 0.05, respectively.
410 Chemical Engineering Research and Design 1 4 4 ( 2 0 1 9 ) 405–417
Table 1 – Ranges of temperature (T), partial pressure of CO2 (PCO2 ), and concentration of PZ (CPZ ) of the collected data
points (n).
PCO2 (kPa) T (K) CPZ (mol/L) CO2 solubility (mol CO2 /mol PZ) n References
lows:
x2
2
0.006072 9.89314484 − ex2
y = 0.0001494x1 −
19.937466+ex3
x2 + x1 +1
x3
0.0001494 11.872896 − x2 0.0001494x2
+ +
x3 x3
x2
0.0006357 0.006072 x2 − x3 − x12 + x3
− +
x2 x1
0.0001494 (x2 − 2x1 + 2.942727)
Fig. 3 – Schematic diagram of combined GA and ANFIS −
0.3469x3 − 2.883
model.
0.0001494 (2x3 + 18.122610)
+ + 2.816 (12)
5.2. GP results x1 x32
The maximum generations of 1000, 100 populations, the max- where x1 , x2 , and x3 stand for the temperature (K), par-
imum depth of trees of 7, and the tournament selection tial pressure of CO2 (kPa), and concentration of PZ (mol/L),
approach are taken into account in the GP algorithm. The best respectively. The evolutionary algorithm for this deterministic
®
value for the tree depth is selected to be 7 after the mag- approach is performed by the GPTIPS toolbox in the MATLAB
nitudes of 6–12 trees were tested so that the runtime and software.
error percentage hold the minimum values at the depth of The model results (for both deterministic tools) are com-
trees of 7. To generate proper mathematical models using pared against the actual values and this comparison is
the GP, the function set of (+, −, ×, /, and exp) is chosen. depicted in Fig. 5, showing a slope near one. It implies that
An independent variable (X) or an integer is considered as the predictions and experimental data are in a good match.
the terminal. As mentioned earlier, temperature (in K), par- The coefficient of determination (R2 ) of the GA-ANFIS model
tial pressure of CO2 (in kPa), and PZ concentration (in mol/L) is 0.9531, while the R2 of the GP approach is 0.9735. Therefore,
are the independent input variables, and the CO2 solubility is both methods are successful in explaining a major part of cor-
the objective function. To evaluate the fitness function perfor- relation in the data, though the GP model shows a slightly
mance, the Mean Squared Error (MSE) of the GP, representing better performance.
the difference between the predictions and experimental val- Fig. 6 illustrates the experimental data and model estima-
ues, is used. Table 3 presents the specifications of the GP tions versus the data index to examine the accuracy of both
model. models. As it is clear, there is a very good agreement between
Employing the GP model, the best correlation to determine the estimated magnitudes of solubility and the experimental
the CO2 solubility in the PZ/H2 O solutions is obtained as fol- data within a wide range of operating conditions. It can be con-
Chemical Engineering Research and Design 1 4 4 ( 2 0 1 9 ) 405–417 411
Fig. 4 – The Membership Functions (MFs) for (a) temperature, (b) partial pressure of CO2 , and (c) concentration of PZ in
prognostication of solubility of CO2 in PZ/water solutions on the basis of the GA-ANFIS model.
cluded that both GA-ANFIS and GP result in accurate values for bution confirm that the models follow relatively the normal
the target parameter (e.g., CO2 solubility in PZ solutions). His- distribution curves.
tograms of the model errors are shown in Figs. 7 and 8. For The relative error (%) in the model outputs compared to
both GA-ANFIS and GP models, the histogram for the training the experimental data is demonstrated in Fig. 9. Except for
and testing phases is presented. The results of error distri- the lower range of pressure (P < 0.5 MPa), the errors are ran-
412 Chemical Engineering Research and Design 1 4 4 ( 2 0 1 9 ) 405–417
Table 4 – Statistical values while estimating the CO2 solubility in mixture of PZ and H2 O through utilization of various
models in this study.
Parameter GA-ANFIS GP
n
(xk,i − xk · m )(yi − ym )
i=1
rk = (13)
n
2
n
2
(xk,i − xk · m ) (yi − ym )
i=1 i=1
Fig. 10 – Objective function determined by the GA-ANFIS and GP models versus temperature and partial pressure of CO2 :
T = 313 K & PZ concentration = 0.6 M (Bishnoi and Rochelle, 2000); T = 343 K & PZ concentration = 0.6 M (Bishnoi and Rochelle,
2000); and T = 298 K & PZ concentration = 0.2 M (Dash et al., 2011a). The solid and dashed lines show the GP and GA-ANFIS
model estimates, respectively, and the scatter points represent the experimental data.
6. Conclusions
the GA-ANFIS model results exhibit a very good match with Cottrell, A., Cousins, A., Huang, S., Dave, N., DoT, F.P., McHugh, S.,
the real data, as well. The GP model can be used by various Sinclair, M., 2013. Concentrated piperazine based
researchers, who are not familiar with artificial intelligence post-combustion-capture for Australian coal-fired power
plants. Summary Report to Australian National Low
science to predict the CO2 solubility. The sensitivity analysis
Emissions Coal Research and Development CSIRO.
shows that the partial pressure of CO2 has the highest influ- Crutzen, P.J., Mosier, A.R., Smith, K.A., Winiwarter, W., 2016. N2 O
ence on the CO2 solubility in the PZ solution. release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming
reduction by replacing fossil fuels. In: Crutzen, Paul J. (Ed.), A
Pioneer on Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Change in
References the Anthropocene. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 227–238.
Dadkhah, M.R., Tatar, A., Mohebbi, A., Barati-Harooni, A.,
Aghaie, M., Rezaei, N., Zendehboudi, S., 2018. A systematic review Najafi-Marghmaleki, A., Ghiasi, M.M., Mohammadi, A.H.,
on CO2 capture with ionic liquids: current status and future Pourfayaz, F., 2017. Prediction of solubility of solid compounds
prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 96, 502–525. in supercritical CO2 using a connectionist smart technique. J.
Aghaie, M., Rezaei, N., Zendehboudi, S., 2019. Assessment of Supercrit. Fluids 120, 181–190.
carbon dioxide solubility in ionic liquid/toluene/water Das, A., Choucair, M., Southon, P.D., Mason, J.A., Zhao, M., Kepert,
systems by extended PR and PC-SAFT EOSs: carbon capture C.J., Harris, A.T., D’Alessandro, D.M., 2013. Application of the
implication. J. Mol. Liq. 275, 323–337. piperazine-grafted CuBTTri metal–organic framework in
Anderson, T.R., Hawkins, E., Jones, P.D., 2016. CO2 , the postcombustion carbon dioxide capture. Microporous
greenhouse effect and global warming: from the pioneering Mesoporous Mater. 174, 74–80.
work of Arrhenius and Callendar to today’s Earth system Dash, S.K., Bandyopadhyay, S.S., 2016. Studies on the effect of
models. Endeavour 40, 178–187. addition of piperazine and sulfolane into aqueous solution of
Arabloo, M., Bahadori, A., Ghiasi, M.M., Lee, M., Abbas, A., N-methyldiethanolamine for CO2 capture and VLE modelling
Zendehboudi, S., 2015. A novel modeling approach to optimize using eNRTL equation. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 44, 227–237.
oxygen?steam ratios in coal gasification process. Fuel 153, 1–5. Dash, S.K., Samanta, A., Samanta, A.N., Bandyopadhyay, S.S.,
Aroua, M., Mohd Salleh, R., 2004. Solubility of CO2 in aqueous 2011a. Vapour liquid equilibria of carbon dioxide in dilute and
piperazine and its modeling using the Kent–Eisenberg concentrated aqueous solutions of piperazine at low to high
approach. Chem. Eng. Technol. 27, 65–70. pressure. Fluid Phase Equilib. 300, 145–154.
Azizi, N., Rezakazemi, M., Zarei, M.M., 2017. An intelligent Dash, S.K., Samanta, A.N., Bandyopadhyay, S.S., 2011b. Solubility
approach to predict gas compressibility factor using neural of carbon dioxide in aqueous solution of
network model. Neural Comput. Appl., 1–10. 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol and piperazine. Fluid Phase
Babamohammadi, S., Shamiri, A., Borhani, T.N.G., Shafeeyan, Equilib. 307, 166–174.
M.S., Aroua, M.K., Yusoff, R., 2018. Solubility of CO2 in aqueous Dashti, A., Asghari, M., 2015. Recent progresses in ceramic
solutions of glycerol and monoethanolamine. J. Mol. Liq. 249, hollowfiber membranes. ChemBioEng Rev. 2, 54–70.
40–52. Dashti, A., Harami, H.R., Rezakazemi, M., 2018a. Accurate
Bäck, T., Fogel, D.B., Michalewicz, Z., 1997. Handbook of prediction of solubility of gases within H2 -selective
evolutionary computation. Release 97, B1. nanocomposite membranes using committee machine
Baghban, A., Ahmadi, M.A., Shahraki, B.H., 2015. Prediction intelligent system. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43, 6614–6624.
carbon dioxide solubility in presence of various ionic liquids Dashti, A., Raji, M., Azarafza, A., Baghban, A., Mohammadi, A.H.,
using computational intelligence approaches. J. Supercrit. Asghari, M., 2018b. Rigorous prognostication and modeling of
Fluids 98, 50–64. gas adsorption on activated carbon and Zeolite-5A. J. Environ.
Baghban, A., Bahadori, A., Mohammadi, A.H., Behbahaninia, A., Manage. 224, 58–68.
2017a. Prediction of CO2 loading capacities of aqueous Derks, P., Dijkstra, H., Hogendoorn, J., Versteeg, G., 2005. Solubility
solutions of absorbents using different computational of carbon dioxide in aqueous piperazine solutions. AIChE J. 51,
schemes. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 57, 143–161. 2311–2327.
Baghban, A., Mohammadi, A.H., Taleghani, M.S., 2017b. Rigorous Derks, P., Kleingeld, T., Van Aken, C., Hogendoorn, J., Versteeg, G.,
modeling of CO2 equilibrium absorption in ionic liquids. Int. J. 2006. Kinetics of absorption of carbon dioxide in aqueous
Greenh. Gas Control 58, 19–41. piperazine solutions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 61, 6837–6854.
Bishnoi, S., Rochelle, G.T., 2000. Absorption of carbon dioxide into Doshi, E.M., 2016. A review of climate changes due to the global
aqueous piperazine: reaction kinetics, mass transfer and worming. In: MSc thesis. Sudan University of Science and
solubility. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55, 5531–5543. Technology, Khartoum, Sudan, p. 45.
Bolin, B., Warrick, B.R., Jager, R.A., Dôôs, J., 1986. The Greenhouse Du, Y., Li, L., Namjoshi, O., Voice, A.K., Fine, N.A., Rochelle, G.T.,
Effect, Climatic Change, and Ecosystems. Wiley, San 2013. Aqueous piperazine/N-(2-aminoethyl) piperazine for
Francisco, USA. CO2 capture. Energy Procedia 37, 1621–1638.
Burney, J.A., Davis, S.J., Lobell, D.B., 2010. Greenhouse gas Dugas, R., Rochelle, G., 2009. Absorption and desorption rates of
mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. carbon dioxide with monoethanolamine and piperazine.
107, 12052–12057. Energy Procedia 1, 1163–1169.
Chakravarty, T., Phukan, U., Weilund, R., 1985. Reaction of acid Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K.,
gases with mixtures of amines. Chem. Eng. Prog. (United Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen,
States) 81. G., Schlömer, S., 2011. IPCC special report on renewable energy
Chamkalani, A., Zendehboudi, S., Bahadori, A., Kharrat, R., sources and climate change mitigation. In: Prepared By
Chamkalani, R., James, L., Chatzis, I., 2014. Integration of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
LSSVM technique with PSO to determine asphaltene Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
deposition. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 124, 243–253. Ermatchkov, V., Pérez-Salado Kamps, Á., Speyer, D., Maurer, G.,
Chaudhary, P., Kumar, R., Verma, A.K., Singh, D., Yadav, V., 2006. Solubility of carbon dioxide in aqueous solutions of
Chhillar, A.K., Sharma, G., Chandra, R., 2006. Synthesis and piperazine in the low gas loading region. J. Chem. Eng. Data
antimicrobial activity of N-alkyl and N-aryl piperazine 51, 1788–1796.
derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14, 1819–1826. Freeman, S.A., Davis, J., Rochelle, G.T., 2010a. Degradation of
Chetan, B., Bunha, M., Jagrat, M., Sinha, B.N., Saiko, P., Graser, G., aqueous piperazine in carbon dioxide capture. Int. J. Greenh.
Szekeres, T., Raman, G., Rajendran, P., Moorthy, D., 2010. Gas Control 4, 756–761.
Design, synthesis and anticancer activity of piperazine Freeman, S.A., Dugas, R., Van Wagener, D.H., Nguyen, T., Rochelle,
hydroxamates and their histone deacetylase (HDAC) G.T., 2010b. Carbon dioxide capture with concentrated,
inhibitory activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20, 3906–3910.
416 Chemical Engineering Research and Design 1 4 4 ( 2 0 1 9 ) 405–417
aqueous piperazine. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 4, piperazine through absorption process. Int. J. Greenh. Gas
119–124. Control 50, 179–189.
Ganjidoost, H., Mousavi, S.J., Soroush, A., 2016. Adaptive Khan, S.N., Hailegiorgis, S.M., Man, Z., Shariff, A.M., Garg, S., 2017.
network-based fuzzy inference systems coupled with genetic Thermophysical properties of concentrated aqueous solution
algorithms for predicting soil permeability coefficient. Neural of N-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), piperazine (PZ), and ionic
Process. Lett. 44, 53–79. liquids hybrid solvent for CO2 capture. J. Mol. Liq. 229, 221–229.
Gettys, K.E., Ye, Z., Dai, M., 2017. Recent advances in piperazine Kirk-Davidoff, D., 2017. The Greenhouse Effect, Aerosols, and
synthesis. Synthesis 49, 2589–2604. Climate Change, Green Chemistry. Elsevier, New York, USA,
Ghasemi, E., Kalhori, H., Bagherpour, R., 2016. A new hybrid pp. 211–234.
ANFIS–PSO model for prediction of peak particle velocity due Koza, J.R., 1992. Genetic Programming II, Automatic Discovery of
to bench blasting. Eng. Comput. 32, 607–614. Reusable Subprograms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Ghiasi, M.M., Arabloo, M., Mohammadi, A.H., Barghi, T., 2016. Lepaumier, H., Picq, D., Carrette, P.-L., 2009. New amines for CO2
Application of ANFIS soft computing technique in modeling capture. I. Mechanisms of amine degradation in the presence
the CO2 capture with MEA, DEA, and TEA aqueous solutions. of CO2 . Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 9061–9067.
Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 49, 47–54. Li, L., Voice, A.K., Li, H., Namjoshi, O., Nguyen, T., Du, Y., Rochelle,
Ghiasi, M.M., Bahadori, A., Zendehboudi, S., 2014. Estimation of G.T., 2013. Amine blends using concentrated piperazine.
the water content of natural gas dried by solid calcium Energy Procedia 37, 353–369.
chloride dehydrator units. Fuel 117, 33–42. Mao, Z., Zheng, X., Qi, Y., Zhang, M., Huang, Y., Wan, C., Rao, G.,
Goldberg, D.E., 1989. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, 2016. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel hybrid
and Machine Learning, 1989. Addison-Wesley, Reading. compounds between chalcone and piperazine as potential
Hamzehie, M., Mazinani, S., Davardoost, F., Mokhtare, A., Najibi, antitumor agents. RSC Adv. 6, 7723–7727.
H., Van der Bruggen, B., Darvishmanesh, S., 2014. Developing a Mazari, S.A., Ali, B.S., Jan, B.M., Saeed, I.M., 2014. Degradation
feed forward multilayer neural network model for prediction study of piperazine, its blends and structural analogs for CO2
of CO2 solubility in blended aqueous amine solutions. J. Nat. capture: a review. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 31, 214–228.
Gas Sci. Eng. 21, 19–25. Mumford, K.A., Wu, Y., Smith, K.H., Stevens, G.W., 2015. Review of
Hamzehie, M., Fattahi, M., Najibi, H., Van der Bruggen, B., solvent based carbon-dioxide capture technologies. Front.
Mazinani, S., 2015. Application of artificial neural networks for Chem. Sci. Eng. 9, 125–141.
estimation of solubility of acid gases (H2 S and CO2 ) in 32 Nasery, S., Barati-Harooni, A., Tatar, A., Najafi-Marghmaleki, A.,
commonly ionic liquid and amine solutions. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Mohammadi, A.H., 2016. Accurate prediction of solubility of
Eng. 24, 106–114. hydrogen in heavy oil fractions. J. Mol. Liq. 222, 933–943.
Haramoto, Y., Yamada, T., Nanasawa, M., Funahashi, M., Hanna, Nath, K., 2017. Membrane Separation Processes. PHI Learning Pvt.
J., Ujiie, S., 2002. Conductive liquid crystalline compounds Ltd., New Delhi, India.
having a piperazine structure. Liq. Cryst. 29, 1109–1111. Nguyen, T., Hilliard, M., Rochelle, G.T., 2010. Amine volatility in
Hasanipanah, M., Amnieh, H.B., Arab, H., Zamzam, M.S., 2016. CO2 capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 4, 707–715.
Feasibility of PSO–ANFIS model to estimate rock Norouzbahari, S., Shahhosseini, S., Ghaemi, A., 2015. Modeling of
fragmentation produced by mine blasting. Neural Comput. CO2 loading in aqueous solutions of piperazine: application of
Appl., 1–10. an enhanced artificial neural network algorithm. J. Nat. Gas
Haykin, S., Network, N., 2004. A comprehensive foundation. Sci. Eng. 24, 18–25.
Neural Netw. 2, 41. Olajire, A.A., 2010. CO2 capture and separation technologies for
Headley, J., Peru, K., Adenugba, A., McMartin, D., 2012. Tandem end-of-pipe applications—a review. Energy 35, 2610–2628.
Mass Spectrometry of Alkanolamines in Environmental Padaki, M., Murali, R.S., Abdullah, M.S., Misdan, N., Moslehyani,
Samples, Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Applications and A., Kassim, M., Hilal, N., Ismail, A., 2015. Membrane
Principles. IntechOpen Limited, London, UK. technology enhancement in oil–water separation. A review.
Ho, Y.-S., 2006. Review of second-order models for adsorption Desalination 357, 197–207.
systems. J. Hazard. Mater. 136, 681–689. Raji, F., Pakizeh, M., Saraeian, A., Raji, M., 2016. A detailed study
Houck, C.R., Joines, J., Kay, M.G., 1995. A genetic algorithm for on adsorption isotherms of Hg(II) removal from aqueous
function optimization: a Matlab implementation. Ncsu-ie tr solutions using nanostructured sorbent ZnCl2 -MCM-41.
95, 1–10. Desalin. Water Treat. 57, 18694–18709.
Jang, J.-S., 1993. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference Rezakazemi, M., Dashti, A., Asghari, M., Shirazian, S., 2017.
system. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 23, 665–685. H2 -selective mixed matrix membranes modeling using ANFIS,
Kamari, A., Safiri, A., Mohammadi, A.H., 2015a. Compositional PSO-ANFIS, GA-ANFIS. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42,
model for estimating asphaltene precipitation conditions in 15211–15225.
live reservoir oil systems. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 36, 301–309. Rezakazemi, M., Dashti, A., Harami, H.R., Hajilari, N., 2018.
Kamari, A., Bahadori, A., Mohammadi, A.H., Zendehboudi, S., Fouling-resistant membranes for water reuse. Environ. Chem.
2015b. New tools predict monoethylene glycol injection rate Lett., 1–49.
for natural gas hydrate inhibition. J. Loss Prevent. Proc. Ind. Rochelle, G., Chen, E., Freeman, S., Van Wagener, D., Xu, Q., Voice,
33, 222–231. A., 2011. Aqueous piperazine as the new standard for CO2
Kamari, A., Mohammadi, A.H., Bahadori, A., Zendehboudi, S., capture technology. Chem. Eng. J. 171, 725–733.
2014a. A reliable model for estimating the wax deposition rate Rodrigues, A.E., Minceva, M., 2005. Modelling and simulation in
during crude oil production and processing. Petrol. Sci. chemical engineering: tools for process innovation. Comput.
Technol. 32 (23), 2837–2844. Chem. Eng. 29, 1167–1183.
Kamari, A., Mohammadi, A.H., Bahadori, A., Zendehboudi, S., Saeidi, S., Amin, N.A.S., Rahimpour, M.R., 2014. Hydrogenation of
2014b. Prediction of air specific heat ratios at elevated CO2 to value-added products—a review and potential future
pressures using a novel modeling approach. Chem. Eng. developments. J. CO2 Util. 5, 66–81.
Technol. 37 (12), 2047–2055. Sartori, G., Savage, D.W., 1983. Sterically hindered amines for
Kamari, A., Bahadori, A., Mohammadi, A.H., Zendehboudi, S., carbon dioxide removal from gases. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam.
2014c. Evaluating the unloading gradient pressure in 22, 239–249.
continuous gas-lift systems during petroleum production Seo, D.J., Hong, W.H., 2000. Effect of piperazine on the kinetics of
operations. Petrol. Sci. Technol. 32 (24), 2961–2968. carbon dioxide with aqueous solutions of
Khan, A.A., Halder, G., Saha, A., 2016. Comparing CO2 removal 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39,
characteristics of aqueous solutions of monoethanolamine, 2062–2067.
2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol, methyldiethanolamine and Shakun, J.D., Clark, P.U., He, F., Marcott, S.A., Mix, A.C., Liu, Z.,
Otto-Bliesner, B., Schmittner, A., Bard, E., 2012. Global
Chemical Engineering Research and Design 1 4 4 ( 2 0 1 9 ) 405–417 417
warming preceded by increasing carbon dioxide Waszkielewicz, A.M., Pytka, K., Rapacz, A., Wełna, E., Jarzyna, M.,
concentrations during the last deglaciation. Nature 484, 49. Satała, G., Bojarski, A., Sapa, J., Żmudzki, P., Filipek, B., 2015.
Sodeifian, G., Raji, M., Asghari, M., Rezakazemi, M., Dashti, A., Synthesis and evaluation of antidepressantlike activity of
2018. Polyurethane-SAPO-34 mixed matrix membrane for some 4substituted 1-(2-methoxyphenyl) piperazine
CO2 /CH4 and CO2 /N2 separation. Chin. J. Chem. Eng., in press. derivatives. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 85, 326–335.
Takai, T., Koike, T., Honda, E., Kajita, Y., Nakamura, M., Morimoto, Yang, H., Xu, Z., Fan, M., Gupta, R., Slimane, R.B., Bland, A.E.,
S., Hoashi, Y., Kamata, M., Watanabe, T., Igari, T., 2015. Design Wright, I., 2008. Progress in carbon dioxide separation and
and synthesis of piperazine derivatives as a novel class of capture: a review. J. Environ. Sci. 20, 14–27.
␥-secretase modulators that selectively lower A 42 Yarveicy, H., Ghiasi, M.M., Mohammadi, A.H., 2018. Performance
production. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 23, 1923–1934. evaluation of the machine learning approaches in modeling of
Tan, Y., Shao, Z.-B., Yu, L.-X., Long, J.-W., Qi, M., Chen, L., Wang, CO2 equilibrium absorption in piperazine aqueous solution. J.
Y.-Z., 2016. Piperazine-modified ammonium polyphosphate as Mol. Liq. 255, 375–383.
monocomponent flame-retardant hardener for epoxy resin: Ying, L.-C., Pan, M.-C., 2008. Using adaptive network based fuzzy
flame retardance, curing behavior and mechanical property. inference system to forecast regional electricity loads. Energy
Polym. Chem. 7, 3003–3012. Convers. Manage. 49, 205–211.
Tatar, A., Barati-Harooni, A., Najafi-Marghmaleki, A., Mohebbi, A., Yokozeki, A., Kuchitsu, K., 1971. Molecular structure of piperazine
Ghiasi, M.M., Mohammadi, A.H., Hajinezhad, A., 2016a. as studied by gas electron diffraction. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 44,
Comparison of two soft computing approaches for predicting 2352–2355.
CO2 solubility in aqueous solution of piperazine. Int. J. Yong, Z., Mata, V., Rodrigues, Ar.E., 2002. Adsorption of carbon
Greenh. Gas Control. 53, 85–97. dioxide at high temperature—a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 26,
Tatar, A., Barati-Harooni, A., Partovi, M., Najafi-Marghmaleki, A., 195–205.
Mohammadi, A.H., 2016b. An accurate model for predictions Yu, C.-H., Huang, C.-H., Tan, C.-S., 2012. A review of CO2 capture
of vaporization enthalpies of hydrocarbons and petroleum by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 12,
fractions. J. Mol. Liq. 220, 192–199. 745–769.
Tatar, A., Barati, A., Yarahmadi, A., Najafi, A., Lee, M., Bahadori, Yun, Z., Quan, Z., Caixin, S., Shaolan, L., Yuming, L., Yang, S.,
A., 2016c. Prediction of carbon dioxide solubility in aqueous 2008. RBF neural network and ANFIS-based short-term load
mixture of methyldiethanolamine and N-methylpyrrolidone forecasting approach in real-time price environment. IEEE
using intelligent models. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 47, Trans. Power Syst. 23, 853–858.
122–136. Zargar, V., Asghari, M., Dashti, A., 2015. A review on chitin and
Voigt, C., Lamprecht, R.E., Marushchak, M.E., Lind, S.E., chitosan polymers: structure, chemistry, solubility,
Novakovskiy, A., Aurela, M., Martikainen, P.J., Biasi, C., 2017. derivatives, and applications. ChemBioEng Rev. 2, 204–226.
Warming of subarctic tundra increases emissions of all three Zendehboudi, S., Rezaei, N., Lohi, A., 2018. Applications of hybrid
important greenhouse gases–carbon dioxide, methane, and models in chemical, petroleum, and energy systems: a
nitrous oxide. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3121–3138. systematic review. Appl. Energy 228, 2539–2566.
Wallington, T.J., Srinivasan, J., Nielsen, O.J., Highwood, E.J., 2009. Zhang, Z., Chen, F., Rezakazemi, M., Zhang, W., Lu, C., Chang, H.,
Greenhouse gases and global warming. Environ. Ecol. Chem. Quan, X., 2018. Modeling of a CO2 -piperazine-membrane
1, 36. absorption system. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 131, 375–384.
Wang, M., Joel, A.S., Ramshaw, C., Eimer, D., Musa, N.M., 2015. Zhou, Y., Zhang, L., Zhou, J., Zhou, X., 2017. Benzo five-membered
Process intensification for post-combustion CO2 capture with nitrogen heterocyclic piperidine or piperazine derivatives and
chemical absorption: a critical review. Appl. Energy 158, preparation methods and pharmaceutical compositions
275–291. thereof. Google Patents.