Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Textbook Anatomy of Authoritarianism in The Arab Republics Joseph Sassoon Ebook All Chapter PDF
Textbook Anatomy of Authoritarianism in The Arab Republics Joseph Sassoon Ebook All Chapter PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-reawakening-of-the-arab-
world-challenge-and-change-in-the-aftermath-of-the-arab-spring-
samir-amin/
https://textbookfull.com/product/state-and-nation-making-in-
latin-america-and-spain-republics-of-the-possible-miguel-a-
centeno/
https://textbookfull.com/product/authoritarianism-and-the-elite-
origins-of-democracy-michael-albertus/
https://textbookfull.com/product/authoritarianism-and-the-elite-
origins-of-democracy-michael-albertus-2/
The Edinburgh Companion to the Arab Novel in English
The Politics of Anglo Arab and Arab American Literature
and Culture 1st Edition Nouri Gana
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-edinburgh-companion-to-the-
arab-novel-in-english-the-politics-of-anglo-arab-and-arab-
american-literature-and-culture-1st-edition-nouri-gana/
https://textbookfull.com/product/human-rights-in-china-a-social-
practice-in-the-shadows-of-authoritarianism-1st-edition-eva-pils/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-arab-of-the-future-a-
childhood-in-the-middle-east-1978-1984-a-graphic-memoir-the-arab-
of-the-future-1-riad-sattouf/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mobilising-the-diaspora-how-
refugees-challenge-authoritarianism-alexander-betts/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-book-of-horror-the-anatomy-
of-fear-in-film-matt-glasby/
Anatomy of Authoritarianism
in the Arab Republics
joseph sassoon
University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107618312
© Joseph Sassoon 2016
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception
and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements,
no reproduction of any part may take place without the written
permission of Cambridge University Press.
First published 2016
Printed in the United States of America by Sheridan Books, Inc.
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library
ISBN 978-1-107-04319-0 Hardback
ISBN 978-1-107-61831-2 Paperback
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of
URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication,
and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain,
accurate or appropriate.
To Rachey
Contents
3 The military 73
Military and politics 73
The military and wars 85
Watching the guardians of the nation 94
Officers and soldiers 100
Conclusion 111
vii
viii Contents
Conclusion 252
Appendix: Timeline of major events in the Arab republics 270
Bibliography 277
Index 315
Tables
ix
Acknowledgments
During the years of research and writing this book, I amassed a large
debt of gratitude to many people and a few organizations. Georgetown
University, my new academic home, has been a wonderful and
supportive place for me and I feel fortunate to be at the Center for
Contemporary Arab Studies. Osama Abi-Mershed, the director of the
Center, Rochelle Davis, and Fida Adely are friends and colleagues who
provided help and advice on many levels.
Many colleagues have read chapters and provided excellent
suggestions: Eugene Rogan, Michael Willis, Gretchen Helmke, and
Rochelle Davis. Furthermore, I benefited from discussing the project
with a number of colleagues, among them Martin Dimitrov and Dina
Khoury, particularly at the early stages.
Another organization that I am indebted to is the Woodrow Wilson
Center for International Scholars. During the academic year 2014–15,
I was given a fellowship, which allowed me to write the book in the
most congenial atmosphere possible for scholars. I would like to thank
Haleh Esfandiari and Robert Litwak for their help and encouragement.
The Library team at the Center is a dream team for every researcher:
Janet Spikes, Katherine Wahler, and Michelle Kamalich. A great
advantage of being at the Center is the presence of other fellows and
scholars who provide invaluable suggestions. I would like to thank in
particular Robert Worth, Max Rodenbeck, and Roya Hakakian for
their wonderful friendship and support.
Alissa Walter accompanied this project from its genesis. Her
knowledge of the region and Arabic, her organizational skills, her
research capabilities, and her dedication are truly the envy of any
academic. I thank her profusely for her help. Special thanks are due to
Virginia Myers for help with editing the book in the early stages.
The team at Cambridge University Press has been wonderful. I would
like to thank in particular my copy-editor, Mary Starkey, for her superb
editing, commitment to the project, and attention to detail.
x
Acknowledgments xi
For most Arabic names and words, this book uses a modified
transliteration system based on the guidelines of the International
Journal of Middle East Studies (IJMES). In the interest of making
Arabic terms accessible to non-specialist readers, I have only included
diacritical marks for the Arabic letters ayn ( ‘ ) and hamza ( ’ ).
Otherwise, Arabic letters have been transliterated according to the
IJMES system with diacritical markings omitted.
Two important exceptions have been made to this system. First,
correct transliteration can have the unfortunate effect of rendering
famous names unrecognizable, changing, for instance, Gamal ‘Abd
al-Nasser to Jamal ‘Abd al-Nasir or Béji Caïd Essebsi to Baji Qa’id al-
Sabsi. Thus, for heads of state only I have broken with the IJMES
system and have instead used spellings that are more easily
recognizable. For presidents from North Africa, where French is
widely spoken, I have used the common French rendering of names.
For the others, I have used common English spellings. A list of the
names of Arab presidents can be found in Table 3.1.
Second, a small number of the memoirists examined in this book
published their writings in English or French, in addition to Arabic. In
these cases, I consistently used the authors’ own preferred English or
French spelling of their names, rather than using a “correct”
transliteration of their names according to the IJMES system, even
when referring to their writings in Arabic. This applies to authors
such as Mohamed Mzali, Ahmed Mestiri, and Khalid Nezzar.
xii
Glossary and abbreviations
xiii
xiv Glossary and abbreviations
Abbreviations
FLN Front de Libération Nationale (National Liberation Front) –
Algeria
NDP al-Hizb al-Watani al-Dimuqrati (National Democratic
Party) – Egypt
PSD Parti Socialiste Destourien (Constitutional Socialist Party) –
Tunisia
RCD Rassemblement Constitutionnel Démocratique (Democratic
Constitutional Rally) – Tunisia
SSO Special Security Organization – Iraq
Map of the eight Arab republics
Algiers
Tunis SYRIA
TUNISIA Mediterranean Sea Damascus Baghdad
Tripoli
IRAQ
Cairo
er
P
sia
ALGERIA nG
LIBYA u lf
EGYPT
Re
d
SUDAN Se
a
Khartoum
YEMEN
San‘a’
den
f A
lf o
Gu
xv
Introduction
Five years after the uprisings that swept through the Arab republics in
2011, it is hard to argue that the people in these countries are faring any
better than before, except in the case of Tunisia. All eight republics –
Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, and Yemen – have
long been characterized as authoritarian regimes. This book seeks to
deepen our understanding of the authoritarianism and coercive systems
that prevailed in these countries, and such knowledge is also critical to
making a successful transition to a more open and free society.
The failure and collapse of countries such as Libya or Yemen, and
Syria’s protracted civil war, suggest that the demise of authoritarianism
in the region is perhaps remote. Western observers’ misunderstanding
of the uprisings was partly due to their lack of awareness of how
authoritarian regimes operated. Many were propelled by a wave of
enthusiasm that engulfed not only local people but also scholars and
commentators. A salutary lesson can be drawn from the continuing
research into Latin American and Eastern European regimes where
authoritarianism has been perpetuated in spite of their apparent transi-
tion to democracy. This underlines the importance of detailed and
accurate analysis of the inner workings of these powerful and pervasive
systems.
When researching my previous book (Saddam Hussein’s Ba‘th Party:
Inside an Authoritarian Regime), which was based on the archives of
the Ba‘th Party regime in Iraq (which ruled from 1968 to 2003), I kept
asking whether the other Arab republics were similar or not to Iraq and
to each other. To answer that question, I would ideally have to examine
the archives of other authoritarian Arab regimes. Unfortunately, they
are inaccessible to any researcher. Consequently, I turned to memoirs
written by those who were embedded in the system: political leaders,
ministers, generals, security agency chiefs, party members, and busi-
nessmen close to the center of power. I also examined memoirs of
people who were on the outside: political opponents of these regimes
1
2 Introduction
1
Lisa Anderson, “Authoritarian Legacies and Regime Change: Towards
Understanding Political Transition in the Arab World,” in Fawaz A. Gerges (ed.),
The New Middle East: Protest and Revolution in the Arab World (New York:
Cambridge University Press, 2014), p. 48.
Introduction 3
memoirs have been written in Morocco and Jordan, few have emerged
from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf.
Among the Arab republics, Lebanon was not covered because of its
particular political structure, and it lacks many of the elements of
authoritarian Arab regimes. Palestine was also not included, since most
of the country still toils under occupation, and while aspects of the
Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) are similar to other republics,
it is nevertheless an anomaly. Iran, an obviously authoritarian republic,
is excluded because it is not an Arab state, and its political system is
somewhat unique compared to those of its regional neighbors.
Certain disciplines, such as anthropology and literature, have drawn
widely on memoirs from the region, yet memoirs are less commonly
used as a primary source in modern history and politics, especially in
studies of the Arab world. Historians of other regions have been
quicker to recognize the value of memoirs as a primary source. Given
the lack of archival sources in the Arab world, however, memoirs could
become an essential tool in our study of these countries. Significantly,
the governments that came to power in Tunisia after the fall of Ben ‘Ali
in 2011 refused to open the national archives, fearing that this could
lead to upheavals in the country. One report indicated that files were
burnt in several Tunisian ministries. In Libya, the archives are still
supposedly intact; it is not clear which side controls them.2 Even in
those authoritarian countries around the world that have opened their
archives, as in Russia, scholars regularly complement their work by
poring over memoirs to examine the undercurrents in society and how
those who were on the inside (or outside) perceived the regime.
Because excellent work has already been published about the Arab
world and authoritarianism, to a certain extent this allows us the “lux-
ury” of studying memoirs to complete the picture of political history. The
present book draws on more than 120 memoirs from the eight republics,
as well as recently published testimonies from Tunisia. These testimonies,
which began to be collected after the uprising there, give remarkable
insights into the hidden world of prisons and torture endured by the
many opponents of the previous regime, regardless of their political or
2
‘Abd al-Jalil al-Tamimi (ed.), Dawr al-qasr al-ri’asi fi al-nizam al-Nufimbiri
[The role of the presidential palace in the November regime] (Tunis: Tamimi
Foundation for Scientific Research and Information, April 2014), no. 41,
pp. 15–16. The November regime refers to November 1987 when Ben ‘Ali
took over the presidency in a bloodless coup.
4 Introduction
religious beliefs. No doubt there are memoirs that I have either missed or
could not access, but among those that I read, the all-important questions
I addressed are who wrote them, when and where they were published,
and who their primary audience was. For instance, questions about the
reason why so many Egyptian generals wrote their memoirs will be
addressed in a number of chapters to underline the actual significance
of publishing their memoirs. In addition, a large assortment of scholarly
studies in Arabic, English, and French have supplemented this study.
There is no doubt that memoirs have significant drawbacks, and
these are detailed in Chapter 1. Many were written after their well-
placed authors had left their positions, and sometimes their country.
What authors of memoirs remember, and why, changes over time, and
all these aspects are shaped by the politics of memory. Regrettably, the
memoirs studied here are not divided equally among the eight coun-
tries. From Sudan we have very few, while from Egypt there is an
abundance from a parade of political actors. Needless to say, the
book to some extent reflects this, but I have attempted to compensate
by taking a thematic approach.
I have chosen to focus primarily on how authoritarian systems
operated internally within each of the eight republics. Many memoirs
are centered on major events such as wars or peace negotiations, and
relations with the United States or the Soviet Union. Interesting as these
topics are, they shed little light on internal dynamics. Also, these
memoirs do not explore the role of the superpowers in the region in
strengthening the durability of the regimes internally.
Other limitations of this collection of memoirs have affected the
content of this book. For example, very few women in politics wrote
memoirs or were written about. This is due, in large part, to their
exclusion from key positions of power. In contrast, many biographies
of “famous women” were published in the twentieth century celebrat-
ing their achievements, but unfortunately they do not fit the scope of
this book.3 Second, almost no memoirs of labor movement members or
student union leaders were found that focus on authoritarianism and
its implications for these movements. As a result, I could not examine
issues of gender, education, or labor in great depth, and these are
3
For a comprehensive study of these biographies, see Marilyn Booth, May her
Likes be Multiplied: Biography and Gender Politics in Egypt (Berkeley:
University of California Press, 2001).
Introduction 5
Al-Kawakibi addresses his essay to the youth, so they could learn about
the far-reaching impact of tyranny before it is too late, “before despotism
annihilates the last remnants of vitality in them.” Fearing reprisal, he says
that his booklet is not about a particular ruler but is a discussion of a
general phenomenon. (This theme recurs in many of the memoirs studied
here, even those published long after the rulers have died or been ousted.)
Written more than a century ago, al-Kawakibi’s emphasis on the
4
For a survey of authoritarianism in the Arab world, see Zuhair Farid Mubarak,
Usul al-istibdad al-‘Arabi [The origins of Arab despotism] (Beirut: al-Intishar,
2010).
5
‘Abd al-Rahman al-Kawakibi, Taba’i‘ al-istibdad wa masari‘ al-isti‘bad [The
nature of tyranny and struggle against enslavement] (Cairo: Iqra’ Foundation,
2013), p. 64. Translation of the quote is from Sami A. Hanna and George H.
Gardner, Arab Socialism: A Documentary Survey (Salt Lake City: University of
Utah Press, 1969), p. 218.
6 Introduction
6
Al-Kawakibi, Taba’i‘ al-istibdad, pp. 24–40. Translation was taken from
Khaldun S. al-Husry, Three Reformers: A Study in Modern Arab Political
Thought (Beirut: Khayats, 1966), p. 63. For an interesting discussion of
al-Kawakibi’s book and views, see pp. 55–112.
7
See Suzanne Kassab, Contemporary Arab Thought: Cultural Critique in
Comparative Perspective (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010), p. 37.
8
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and Alastair Smith, The Dictator’s Handbook: Why
Bad Behavior is Almost Always Good Politics (New York: Public Affairs,
2011), p. 2.
Introduction 7
surely due to the state of fear that prevailed. Understanding the reasons
for writing memoirs, the expectations of their authors in publishing
them, and what they included or omitted are all important in under-
standing the personalities of these political actors.
Chapter 2 deals with the ruling party and governance from the per-
spective of these memoirists. Some of these republics, such as Iraq and
Syria, had a one-party system, while others, like Egypt and Tunisia, had
multi-party systems. But there were also countries like Libya, whose
leadership annulled political parties and parliament and created its
own unique system. Through the memoirs of party members, parlia-
mentary opponents, and ministers, the chapter analyzes the substantial
role of ruling parties in perpetuating the regimes. While the triangular
relationship between the leadership, the party, and the bureaucracy
differed from one republic to another, the overall structure of govern-
ance did not vary widely, except in the case of Libya.
Chapter 3 focuses on one of the core organizations in authoritarian
regimes: the military, which had been a vital factor in the histories of these
nations since they gained their independence from the colonial powers
Britain, France, and Italy. Most of the leaders had a military background,
to which they remained connected. Military conflicts and civil wars had
immense political ramifications for these republics, except in Tunisia,
whose leadership managed to keep the army out of politics. Armed
conflicts allowed the authoritarian regimes to stay in power longer by
rallying the population around them and subjugating their opposition.
Yet in spite of the prominence of the military, this chapter will convey
how, once the military leaders became presidents, their relationship with
the military was not always harmonious. An insight is gained by looking
at the lives and careers of military officers through the memoirs they
authored, which mostly indicated the cohesiveness of these institutions.
Chapter 4 dwells on the role of the security services, which were a
cornerstone in establishing these regimes and ensuring their durability.
Heads of security services in almost all the republics wrote memoirs,
mostly to justify their actions. Once again we find many common char-
acteristics. Among them was the fact that all the regimes, without excep-
tion, used imprisonment, torture, and trials as a means of coercing the
opposition in all its shapes and forms. Furthermore, all these regimes
feared the influence of religion and felt threatened by religious movements.
Memoirs of political prisoners portray the extreme suffering of anyone
who opposed or was suspected of opposing the regime, and document the
Introduction 9
extent of violence meted out to opponents and their extended families. The
chapter also reveals how these societies were deeply penetrated by infor-
mants, whose numbers swelled dramatically in most republics. While the
mass of information they gathered was colossal, this did not guarantee
that it was properly analysed or efficiently used; a case in point was the
assassination of Egyptian president Anwar al-Sadat, where the informa-
tion was available but the follow-up was flawed.
Chapter 5 discusses economy and finance. It is clear from memoirs
that economic issues were not high on the leaders’ agenda unless facing
a crisis. The majority of leaders focused on staying in power, and
decisions related to military and foreign affairs were far more impor-
tant in their eyes. Hence, most memoirs only delved slightly into
economic issues, but they still convey information about decision mak-
ing and the role of certain prominent businessmen. One feature was
that leaders in most of these republics were not interested in stemming
corruption. Corruption began to gather momentum in the late 1970s,
and became embedded in the political and bureaucratic systems of
these countries, which in turn benefited the economic elites and
strengthened their alliance with the political leadership.
Chapter 6 analyzes leadership and the cult of personality. Leaders of
the Arab republics shared many personality traits, particularly those who
held power for a long time. Each had a deep belief in himself and in his
elevated role toward his country and people. Many believed they were
carrying a divine risala (message) to their people. As they were sur-
rounded mostly by yes-men and sycophants, this conviction intensified
over time. Escaping assassination attempts and overcoming internal
resistance strengthened their determination and self-belief. Memoirs
clearly highlight another common characteristic: the lack of trust in any-
one or anything. While the leaders demanded utter loyalty from those
close to them, and cherished it, they were not always loyal to their friends
or to those who helped them early in their careers. For instance, Gamal
‘Abd al-Nasser, Mu‘ammar al-Qaddafi, and Saddam Hussein removed
most of the men who were alongside them when they assumed power.
Biographies and autobiographies of leaders underline that they chan-
ged with time. Events such as wars impacted them; assassination
attempts and betrayals by those close to them changed their views
and attitudes. Several became old and sick, which altered their behavior
and decision making. Many observers overlook the contribution of the
cult of personality to leadership, or accord it little weight, but the
10 Introduction
evidence is that this was, and remains, an important tool in the political
armory of authoritarianism and was skillfully used by some leaders. It
placed them above recrimination or reproach and made it extremely
hard to resist their ideas or decisions.
The final chapter addresses the burning issues that continue to con-
front these republics on their troubled path of transitioning from author-
itarianism post-2011. Because only a few memoirs discuss this, the
chapter engages in comparisons with other parts of the world to under-
stand this process. For Tunisia, the only country that is truly undergoing
a transition, I interviewed senior people from the previous regime, as well
as current politicians, academics, and businesspeople to gain an insight
into current issues and challenges. The chapter examines three facets of
transition: governance and state–religion relations; economic problems
and corruption; and confronting the past. The chapter also asks if Iraq
after 2003 could become a case study of post-authoritarianism among
these republics. I argue that in spite of the vast differences between Iraq
and the other republics that witnessed uprisings, lessons can still be
learned from Iraq post-Saddam Hussein. Comparative studies show
that when political change is not accompanied by substantial economic
change, there is a risk of reversion on the political front, as old vested
interests can regain control over the political process.
As for dealing with the history of these regimes, it is argued here that
genuine transition cannot take place unless there is reconciliation with the
past. The coercive security apparatus that existed in the Arab region, not
dissimilar from other parts of the world, has to be analyzed and under-
stood. The testimonies of political prisoners recently collected and pub-
lished in Tunisia augur well for its future in that regard. It has become
clear that the scars of the past that remain after decades of tyranny and
terror cannot be obliterated or ameliorated until we more fully compre-
hend the complexities of these despotic and damaging regimes.
Finally, it is hoped that this book will encourage other researchers to
make greater use of memoirs in understanding the anatomy of author-
itarianism in the Arab states, at least until their archives are made
available.
1 Political memoirs in the Arab
republics
Elie Kedourie’s seminal study about Arab political memoirs in the 1970s
stated: “That they apologize, or palliate or embellish or suppress, in no
way diminishes the value of what they write.”3 From ancient times, those
engaged in political life recorded their deeds and accomplishments in
personal memoirs. The motivation for “presenting one’s life” was seen
as an “act of thanking God and for others to emulate.”4 As Judith Tucker
observes about the role of biographies in the Middle East:
1
Benjamin Disraeli, Sybil, or the Two Nations (Oxford: Oxford World’s Classics,
2008), p. 15.
2
Peter Hennessy, Distilling the Frenzy: Writing the History of One’s Own Times
(London: Biteback Publishing, 2012), p. 19. Lord Hennessey is the Attlee Professor
of Contemporary British History at Queen Mary College, University of London.
3
Elie Kedourie, Arabic Political Memoirs and Other Studies (London: Frank Cass,
1974), p. 178.
4
Dwight F. Reynolds (ed.), Interpreting the Self: Autobiography in the Arabic
Literary Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001), p. 3.
11
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
doen.—Tegelijk reikte hij Sokrates den beker. En deze nam hem aan
en zeer blijmoedig, o Echekrates, zonder eenigszins te beven of van
kleur of gelaatsuitdrukking te veranderen, maar den mensch met
strak-open oogen aanziende, zooals hij dat gewoon was, vroeg hij:
Wat denkt gij van dezen drank, is het geoorloofd daarvan aan
iemand te plengen of niet?—Zooveel, zeî hij, o Sokrates, mengen wij
C als wij meenen dat voldoende is tot drinken.—Juist, zeide hij.
Maar allicht is het geoorloofd, en ook passend, tot de goden te
bidden, dat de verhuizing van hier eene gelukkige moge zijn. Dit doe
ik dan ook, en moge het zoo geschieden. Dadelijk na deze woorden
bracht hij den beker aan zijn mond en dronk hem vlug en rustig leêg.
En de meesten van ons waren zoolang vrij-wel in-staat onze tranen
in te houden, maar toen wij zagen dat hij dronk en gedronken had,
niet meer, maar bij mij vloeiden de tranen met geweld in stroomen,
zoodat ik mij omhulde en mij-zelven beweende; want over hem
D weende ik niet, maar om mijn eigen lot, van welk een vriend ik
beroofd was. Kritoon was nog eer dan ik uit den kring opgestaan,
omdat hij niet in-staat was zijn tranen te bedwingen. En Apollodoros,
die ook al vroeger niet ophield te weenen, brak toen in luide
jammerklachten los en ontstelde elk der aanwezigen, behalve
Sokrates zelven. Doch deze zeide: Wat-voor dingen doet gij nu, mijn
bewonderenswaardigen! Ik echter heb boven-al om die reden de
vrouwen weggezonden, opdat zij met zulke dingen niet storen
E zouden. Want ik heb gehoord, dat men in heilige stilte behoort te
sterven. Doch houdt u rustig en kloek!—En wij op het hooren
hiervan, schaamden ons en lieten af van weenen. Hij wandelde eerst
rond, en nadat, zooals hij zeide, zijn beenen zwaar werden, legde hij
zich achterover neder. Want zoo verzocht hem de slaaf. En deze,
dezelfde die hem het gif had toegediend, onderzocht tegelijk van-tijd-
tot-tijd zijn voeten en beenen, door die te betasten, en daarop kneep
hij hem sterk in den éenen voet en vraagde of hij het voelde.
Sokrates zeide van-niet. En daarna kneep hij in de scheenbeenen,
118 en zoo omhooggaande, liet hij ons zien, dat hij langzamerhand
koud en stijf werd. Ook Sokrates zelf betastte zich en zeide, dat,
wanneer het zijn hart zoû bereiken, hij dan zoû heengaan. Reeds
begonnen ongeveer de deelen van ’t onderlijf koud te worden, toen
hij zijn gelaat onthulde—want hij had zich omhuld—, en het laatste
woord zeide, dat hij gesproken heeft: o Kritoon, wij zijn Asklepios
een haan schuldig. Geef hem dien en vergeet het niet.—Dat zal
geschieden, zeide Kritoon. Maar bedenk of gij nog iets anders te
zeggen hebt.—Op deze vraag van Kritoon antwoordde hij niet meer,
maar kort daarop kreeg hij een lichten schok, en de mensch
onthulde hem, en zijn oogen stonden star. Toen Kritoon dat zag,
drukte hij hem mond en oogen toe.
Dit was het einde voor ons, o Echekrates, van onzen vriend, een
man, zooals wij zouden zeggen, van zijn tijdgenooten die wij leerden
kennen, den besten, en ook overigens den wijsten en
rechtvaardigsten.
AANTEEKENINGEN
60D. E u e n o s . Sofist en dichter, afkomstig van
het eiland Paros. Ook elders vermeldt
Platoon hem (Ap. 20B, Phaidros 267A), met
dezelfde goedmoedige ironie als hier.
89C. A r g e i e r s . Toen de Argeiers in 550 hun
zuidelijk grensgebied met de stad Thureai
aan de Lakedaimoniërs verloren, verboden
zij bij wet hun mannen lang haar, en hun
vrouwen gouden sieraden te dragen
zoolang die stad niet heroverd zoû zijn. Zie
Herodotos I 82.
I o l a o s . Neef van Herakles en diens
wagenmenner en trouwe metgezel. Toen
Herakles bij zijn strijd met de Hydra door
een reusachtige zeekrabbe werd
aangevallen, riep hij de hulp van Iolaos in.
Zie Platoons Euthydemos 297C.
90C. E u r i p o s . De om haar onstuimigheid
bekende enge zeestraat tusschen Boiotia
en het eiland Euboia op de hoogte der
steden Chalkis en Aulis.
95A. H a r m o n i a d e T h e b a a n s c h e .
Gemalin van Kadmos den Phoinikiër, den
mythischen stichter van Thebai.
97C. A n a x a g o r a s . Uit Klazomenai in Lydia.
500-428. Beroemd leerling der Ionische
natuurphilosofen. Hij vestigde zich te
Athenai en werd bevriend met den kring van
Perikles. Om zijn atheïstische stellingen
werd hij, evenals later Sokrates, van
„asebeia” beschuldigd en ontkwam alleen
door Perikles’ invloed aan de doodstraf. Hij
stierf te Lampsakos. Van zijn hoofdwerk
„Over de natuur” bestaan nog slechts
fragmenten.
108D. G l a u k o s . Waarschijnlijk wordt gedoeld op
Glaukos van Chios, den uitvinder van het
soldeeren van ijzer. Zie Herodotos I 25.
118A. Wij zijn A s k l e p i o s een haan schuldig.
Het gewone offer aan den god der
geneeskunde, wanneer men van een ziekte
is hersteld.
Colofon
Duidelijke zetfouten in de originele tekst zijn verbeterd. Wisselende spelling is
gecorrigeerd. Daarnaast is aangepast:
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.