You are on page 1of 38

LECTURE 9

LANGUAGE PROCESSING

1
INTRODUCTION

• We might sometimes be aware that we are searching for a


word, composing a sentence, or straining to understand
someone else. Still, we are unaware of the mechanisms and
operations involved in producing and understanding language.

• Psycholinguistics seek to understand how language is done


(O’Grady, 1997).
2
LEVELS OF LANGUAGE
REPRESENTATION

• You are walking through the


streets of London and
encountering the sad sight of a
homeless person in a doorway.
• In an accent which resembles
London Cockney, the person says
to you:

❑“Got any change?” [gɒ(ʔ) ni


ˈʧaɪnʤ]
3
LEVELS OF LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION

• This is a bottom-up account based entirely upon linguistic data.

• So far, we have not considered the possible effects of context (e.g. world
knowledge or previous experience of homeless people).

4
SERIAL VS. PARALLEL PROCESSING

• Evidence suggests that a listener begins to process an utterance about


200 milliseconds after the speaker has begun to speak.

• So, we process an utterance while it is happening.

• Instead, it seems that we process linguistic information in parallel.

5
6

Serial Processing Parallel Processing


SERIAL VS. PARALLEL PROCESSING

• Let us assume that the listener is operating at the phonological level, attributing
a standard form to [ˈʧaɪnʤ], the last part of the utterance.

• By this point, they might have reached the segmentational level with GOTANY
and inserted possible word boundaries.

• They might have reached the syntactic level with GOT and be working out its
grammatical role.

• So, different parts of the utterance are being processed at different levels – all at7
the same time.
DEEP PROCESSING VS. SHALLOW
PROCESSING
• Deep Processing: encoding the meaning of a word and relating it to
similar words.
• For example, a teacher explains the word “exhaustion” to her students
by sharing her story about running a 15km marathon.

• Shallow Processing: structural and phonemic recognition and the


processing of sentences and word structures.

• For example, a student memorising the facts about the sultanate of8
Malacca for his upcoming history quiz.
LANGUAGE PROCESSING

• The different perspectives of language processing (serial, parallel, deep


and shallow) allow us to comprehend the multifaceted meaning
derivations by different individuals for the same input.

• Until now, there is no one ultimate language processing model that has
been acknowledged in the field of psycholinguistics; many models are still
being proposed and the existing models are still being debated about.

9
CLAUSAL HYPOTHESIS

• In language processing, the clausal hypothesis also contributes to


significant input.

• The hypothesis suggests clauses as the basic unit of analysis in


language comprehension, which includes finite and subordinate clauses.

• This hypothesis recommends ‘chunking’, where longer clauses are


divided into smaller chunks for easy comprehension. 10
CLAUSAL HYPOTHESIS

• Example:

• In the example above, the first sentence is chunked into two parts: “John
wanted” and “to leave work early”. Similarly, in the second, the sentence is
chunked into “The man was very tall” and “who John saw”.

• This chunking of clauses helps the language processing to go faster and11


smoother.
SPOKEN AND VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION

• Language processing is also aided by spoken and visual word


recognition, which are affected by several factors.

❑Word superiority effect


❑Word length effect
❑Frequency effect
❑Regularity effect
12
WORD SUPERIORITY EFFECT
• The word superiority effect indicates that we do not simply process a
word letter-by-letter but rather that recognizing a word makes the letters
in that word more readily available.

• Thus, the recognition of letters within a string of letters is easier and more
accurate if the string constitutes an existing word.

• For example, the letter ‘d’ is recognised in an existing word like ‘world’
rather than in a non-word ‘wlod’.
13
WORD LENGTH EFFECT

• It has been claimed that longer words take longer to recognize.

• The length of a word affects an individual’s memory for words he/she has
seen.

• It is easier and faster to process the word “cat” compared to the word
“interstratifications”.
14
FREQUENCY EFFECT

• High-frequency words are processed more easily and more reliably than
low-frequency words.

• The frequency is also interconnected with word length since research


noted that high-frequency words tend to be shorter than low-frequency
words.

• The connection between word frequency and its length is known as


‘Zipf’s law’, named after the researcher George Kingsley Zipf, who first
proposed it. 15
REGULARITY EFFECT
• This effect concerns the relationship between spelling and pronunciation.

• A regular spelling-sound correspondence means that a word follows the general rules
for arriving at a pronunciation based on the spelling, which makes the recognition
process faster.

• For instance, the letters ‘ie’ in English mostly stand for a long /i:/ sound like in “thief” or
“piece” – this is an example of regular spelling-sound correspondence.

• The letters ‘ave’ in English, on the other hand, can vary constantly. For instance, ‘ave’ in
‘save’ and ‘have’ are different – this is an example of irregular spelling-sound
correspondence. 16
FROM CONCEPT TO EXPRESSION

• After language processing, the next step is to focus on speech


production, which responses towards language processing.

• Speakers will have some notion, concept, or message they wish to


convey (Fodor, 1975).

• Speech Production – the process by which a speaker turns a mental


concept into a spoken utterance.

• Two kinds of data in constructing speech production models – SPEECH17


ERRORS and SPEECH DISFLUENCIES.
FROM CONCEPT TO EXPRESSION

• These data have provided evidence for the units used in generating
speech and the stages between the message the speaker wishes to
convey and its spoken expression.

18
SPEECH ERRORS

• We have experienced utterances that seem to have been mixed up on


their way out, either as speakers or as hearers.

• For instance, “You have missed all my history lectures” could be


produced as “You have hissed all my mystery lectures”.

• Such errors in production, called speech errors or slips of the tongue,


occur regularly in normal conversation. 19
SPEECH ERRORS

• Reverend William A. Spooner, the warden of New College, Oxford


University, England, from 1903 – 1924, became “famous” for producing
errors that confuse sounds, often called Spoonerisms.

Rev.William Spooner was well


known for his slips of the
tongue.
20
SPEECH ERRORS

• He suffered from dysgraphia, a form of dyslexia that causes the sufferer


to confuse sounds of words between closely related phonemes.

• This absent-minded figure was liable to mix up the syllables in his spoken
phrases, which produced unintentional comic effects (genuine mistakes).

• The genuine mistakes may be funny to the listener but embarrassing for
the speaker. 21
DISFLUENCIES

• Many utterances are characterised by hesitations, repetitions, false


starts, and “filler” words such as um, well, or you know (sometimes called
filled pauses).

• Such disfluencies are more common than we think – we tend not to


notice them.

22
DISFLUENCIES

• Such lapses in fluent speech production provide valuable insights into the
units of speech production and permit us to evaluate how much of
speech is mentally planned for its production.

• Pausing phenomena - this strategy is used to pre-plan utterances.

23
TYPES OF ERRORS

24

4 kinds of errors at this level


ANTICIPATION ERRORS

• In anticipation errors, sounds which come later in the utterance


inappropriately appear earlier than intended.

❑Consonant anticipation

❑Vowel anticipation
25
PRESERVATION ERRORS

• In preservation errors, a sound produced early in an utterance reappears


in an incorrect location later.

❑Consonant preservation

❑Vowel preservation
26
PHONEME EXCHANGE

• In phoneme exchange errors, phonemes are reversed.

27
PHONEME DELETION

• In phoneme deletion errors, phonemes are deleted.

28
ANATOMY OF REPAIR

• Repair involves the interruption of an erroneous utterance.

• There are three main phases identified in repair: interruption, editing and
repair (Levelt, 1983)

• A speaker can also use an editing expression (could be the vocalisation


of expressions like ‘uh’).

• The repair is when the speaker makes good the damage of the error from29
the point of restart onwards.
ANATOMY OF REPAIR

30
USE OF GESTURES

• In addition to spoken and written linguistic input, gestures also carry


content that needs to be processed for meaning.

• Among many types of gestures, content-related gestures have been


noted for their prominence in contributing to fluency in speech production.

• Observations revealed that when speakers are prevented from using


content-related gestures, they face reduced fluency and reduced31
vocabulary size (Krauss, 1998).
GESTURE-RELATED CONTENTS

• There are three types under this category:

❑Symbols
❑Indices
❑icons

32
SYMBOLS

• Sometimes called emblems, gestures as symbols ‘stand for’ something.

• They can be used instead of a complete utterance, though they can also
be used alongside information that is contained in the speech.

• They can be used for interpersonal control (e.g. ‘hello’, ‘be quiet’), to
express personal states (‘I approve’, ‘I don’t know’) and for evaluations of
others (‘he’s crazy). 33
SYMBOLS

34
INDICES
• Indexical or indicative gestures direct the
perceiver’s attention to a particular object.

• These gestures usually involve an instrument,


frequently a body part, as well as a locative action.

• For example, a common instrument for indicating is


the forefinger (the index finger), and a frequent
locative action is to point at something (Schegloff,
1984) 35
ICONIC GESTURES
• Speakers execute iconic gestures to depict what is being talked about.

• The gestures are a descriptive part of the primary message.

• The gestures can run alongside spoken information, with speech and
gesture concurrent.

• Alternatively, the gesture can be embedded in the utterance, forming a


component of what the speaker is saying in much the same way as
36
words do.
ICONIC GESTURES

37
ICONIC GESTURES

38

You might also like