You are on page 1of 60

Thank you for downloading Sexual Art from http://michaelrosen.

com

Sexual Art is also available as a paperback from


http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0936705035

Sexual Art License Agreement

Use of this PDF is subject to the following:


1. This PDF is for your personal use only and not for sale or redistribution in any manner.
Copying is allowed only for backup and archive purposes.
2. You may view this PDF on a computer monitor or other video display device, and may print
all or part of it on a printer that you own or lease.
3. You shall not (and shall not permit other persons or entities to) alter the pictures in any
manner, including removing, altering or obscuring the copyright notice.
4. You may not sell or redistribute prints you make in any manner.
5. You may not use the pictures, or any part thereof, in any derivative work in any medium.
6. Fair use, including quotes and reproduction in reviews, is OK.
Sexual Art
Photographs That Test the Limits

Michael A. Rosen

with an Afterword by David Steinberg

Shaynew Press
Box 425221
San Francisco, CA 94142
http://michaelrosen.com/
for Lucile
Thanks to my friends for help and encouragement. Special thanks to Mark I. Chester,
Charles Gatewood, and David Steinberg. And special thanks to David Glenn Rinehart,
a comrade for many years and the one responsible for the design and implementation
of this PDF book.

© 1994-2010 Michael A. Rosen, all rights reserved

World rights reserved, including the right of reproduction in whole or in


part in any form whatsoever. Published by Shaynew Press.

Other publications by Michael A. Rosen are available from


http:// michaelrosen.com. /

ISBN 978-0-936705-07-1

The records required by section 2257 of title 18USC are kept by


Michael A. Rosen, Box 425221, San Francisco, CA 94142-5221
Foreword
Many people believe in Evolution, but sadomasochistic sex scenes. Sexual
they don’t carry the concept to its logical Portraits: Photographs of Radical Sexuality
consequences. They think that we are comprises sharply focused, elegantly
at the conclusion of the Evolutionary composed, studio sexual portraits
process, rather than a step along involving S/M, erotic piercings, and
the way. I believe that we are today’s gender play.
manifestation of the ongoing process we But there is no sex in those books.
call Evolution. In Sexual Magic there is S/M, but there
The family system, with male is no sex; there is whipping, but there is,
dominance, was once central to the for example, no penetration. In Sexual
survival of the species, but it’s no Portraits there is radical sex, but there
longer crucial that the family unit stay is no sex; there are exposed, pierced
monogamous and intact. We know how genitals, but there are, for example, no
to control having or not having children stiff dicks. I wasn’t ready to take on the
and how to protect ourselves from additional challenges in producing and
sexually transmitted diseases. And women promoting the work that explicit sex
in the more progressive countries now brings. In Sexual Art: Photographs that
have equal rights before the law. Test the Limits, I present transgressive
If Evolution once dictated that sex images of explicit sex, and I feature what
was solely for reproduction, I believe I call non-standard penetration.
that Evolution now says it’s ok to have Can sexually explicit images be
fun with sex play and to push the art? I say, “yes,” and that such art is
limits of sensory experience—as long good for you! Sexual art is a means of
as the experience is consensual, non- expression that is protected by our First
exploitative and safe. Erotic power Amendment, but sexual art also can be
play, sadomasochistic sex, gender play, a healthy part of our lives. The function
and other extreme forms of sexual of art is not merely to decorate our nests
communication are all ok in this society and make us feel good, but rather to
at this time. Evolution now approves challenge our notions of what our world
of multiple sexual partners and sexual is about. I hope that my work shows
partners of the same gender. Who knows something of what the possibilities can
what Evolution has in store for us? be.
In Sexual Art: Photographs that It’s unfortunate that we live in an
Test the Limits, I continue the work of erotophobic society, where the opposite
my previous self-published books on of love (philia) is not a word for hate, but
radical sexuality. Sexual Magic: the S/M is the word phobia, which means fear.
Photographs presents impressionistic, For we fear what we do not know.
gritty, cinema verité images of actual —Michael A. Rosen, July 1994
About This Digital Version
This PDF is a digital version of Sexuality, and Lust & Romance: Rated
Sexual Art: Photographs That Test The X Fine Art Photographs—from Amazon
Limits, which was published as a high- and other online vendors, and Vanilla
quality paperback monograph in 1994. Sex: Explicit Fine Art Photographs from
I believe I coined the term, “sexual art.” blurb.com. Or from me at my website,
The 53 photographs michaelrosen.com.
are transgressive
images of explicit sex. Technical Notes/
Printing The Pictures
What’s Free, and The images for this
Why, and What’s For PDF were scanned
Sale from the original
First, what is it gelatin silver prints
that I’m giving away? that were used to make
The pictures all have the 1994 monograph.
a visible copyright For this project I made
notice. The license check prints the size of
agreement allows the ones in this PDF
printing the pictures, using Photoshop and
but forbids the removal my Epson 3800 printer
of the copyright notice. with Epson K3 ink via
So think of this as an advertisement for their ABW (Advanced Black-and-White)
myself and my work. For me, publication mode on inexpensive glossy paper. It’s
has always been about putting my point best to use a grayscale mode for grayscale
of view out in the world in the most pictures, if your ink jet printer has one,
effective manner. Last century, I chose rather than printing in color—although
printed books for sale; this century I’ve it is certainly possible to achieve good
added a free PDF option. All images in results printing grayscale files as a color
this body of work are for sale as modern image. The Epson 3800 uses two gray
archival inkjet prints, which will last inks, a black ink and very little color ink
longer than traditional gelatin silver in their ABW mode. Canon and HP offer
photographic prints. $150 for an 8x10, competitive systems.
$325 for an 11x14, as of June, 2010. I’ve always worked with Macintosh
Support this work. Buy my art prints. computers, currently a Mac Pro with
Buy my books—Sexual Art: Leopard (OS 10.5). After building this
Photographs That Test The Limits, PDF, I made test prints of pages using
Sexual Magic: the S/M Photographs, Adobe Reader and the Mac Preview
Sexual Portraits: Photographs of Radical application, also via the Epson ABW
driver. At Printer Settings/Basic, I chose What’s Next?
ABW, and the paper type. At Printer I continue to actively photograph
Settings/Advanced Color Settings, I healthy sexual behavior and publish
found that the most accurate setting is books of my photographs. I am always
one or two lighter than the default: the looking for individuals, couples or
settings are Darkest, Darker (default), groups—of all genders, races, ages and
Dark, Normal (best, in my opinion, persuasions—who want to share their
with my setup) and Lighter. I chose the sexual energy, from the vanilla-ish to
default for all other settings. the outrageous, with my camera. Email
My monitor is profiled and, hopefully, michael@michaelrosen.com. See more of
yours is, too. But I have no control my work at michaelrosen.com.
over what my pictures look like on your Watch for my forthcoming Crimes
monitor. And I really have no control over Against Nature.
what my pictures look like coming out of —Michael A. Rosen, June, 2010
your printer. Please don’t complain if you
don’t like your results; I offer no help.
Scott, 1992

Plate 1
Peter and Jack, 1992

Plate 2
Michelle, 1993

Plate 3
Yossie, 1992

Plate 4
Twenty-two Clothespins, 1994

Plate 5
Chicken Bone, 1992

Plate 6
Joyce and Tatiana, 1992

Plate 7
Tatiana and Joyce, 1992

Plate 8
Marian, 1993

Plate 9
Jenne with David and David, 1992

Plate 10
Lady Thorn and a friend, 1993

Plate 11
Geof and Doug, 1993

Plate 12
Ten Brass Rings, 1993

Plate 13
Pierced to a T, 1992

Plate 14
Selena/Andy, 1991

Plate 15
Jack, 1992

Plate 16
Greta, 1992

Plate 17
Greta, 1992

Plate 18
Melissa and Marian, 1993

Plate 19
Breast Bondage, 1985

Plate 2
Vice Grips, 1984

Plate 2
Kathleen, 1992

Plate 2
Molly, 1993

Plate 2
Brian, 1992

Plate 2
Jorge AND "ILL, 1993

Plate 2
Bill AND *ORGE, 1993

Plate 2
Honey Lee and Susie, 1987

Plate 2
John and Frank, 1992

Plate 2
Roland, 1993

Plate 
Robyn, 1992

Plate 3
Simultaneous Penetration, 1992

Plate 3
Simultaneous Penetration, 1984

Plate 3
Carol and Robert, 1993

Plate 3
Robert and Carol, 1993

Plate 3
Daddy Bear, 1993

Plate 3
Petra and a slave, 1993

Plate 3
Carol and Ruby, 1992

Plate 3
Chris and Cathy, 1992

Plate 3
Marty, 1994

Plate 
Packing, 1989

Plate 4
Buddies, 1993

Plate 4
Hooded Individual Sucks Condomed Cock, 1993

Plate 4
Kitty, 1991

Plate 4
Woody and Mark, 1992

Plate 4
Mistress Venus and David, 1992

Plate 4
Mistress Venus and David, 1992

Plate 4
Wolfie and Scarlet, 1992

Plate 
RavenLight and Ilene, 1993

Plate 
Lily, 1991

Plate 
Afterword
SEXUAL ART. logic; sex is not one of them. The heart
Combining these two words is a of the sexual matter lies beyond scientific
gesture as radical as it is simple: an investigation—in the realms of mystery,
affirmation that art can be sexual, that inflection, symbol, and nuance—the
sex itself can be the subject of art, with psyche, the heart, the deepest soul—
no apology necessary. even if we pretend otherwise. As much
That integrating the notions of sex as love, as much as beauty, as much
and art is so unusual and therefore as relationship and emotion of any
so radical speaks to the heart of our kind, sex needs the perspective of art
cultural confusion about sex. Why to shed light on its multiple meanings
should sex—one of the most beautiful, and significances. This is precisely the
profound, vital, basic, complex aspects kind of sexual perspective we have been
of being alive—be anything but fertile consistently denied.
territory for artistic exploration? And yet There has, of course, been extensive
we experience an on-going, exhausting literal photodocumentation of specific
tug of war, individually and societally, sexual acts. This mouth here, this penis
between our basic fascination with this there: voila, the sexual photograph.
primal force and the culturally-induced Sexual photos of this sort have become
resistance to surrendering to its power. commonplace, despite would-be censors.
Historically, artists who make sex the They have something to say about sex to
unapologetic focus of their work have be sure, but only at the most superficial
been ostracized and trivialized. Even now, level. Much more is left unsaid, and
the artful depiction of sex is a matter of the heart of the sexual matter goes
intense public controversy. unacknowledged most of all. Silence
The difficulty of photographing sex equals death in more ways than one.
when we barely know what sex is and What is unrepresented and undiscussed,
when we are so much afraid of it, is what we cannot give form through verbal
itself a statement of how important a or visual language, withers and dies. To
project this is. Submitting sex to artistic declare sex unrepresentable (except way
and photographic exploration is a way over there, among the shadows and the
of coming to understand the sexual garbage) effectively expunges the sexual
perplex that is not otherwise possible—a core from the psychic landscape.
way of speaking of sex that honors its We are told that there are aspects
richness and power, speaking of sex as of sex we may know and speak about,
it really is: wonderfully complex, subtle, but that many other sexual forms are
multidimensional, and paradoxical. unmentionable. Of the vast spectrum of
Some things can be well understood sexual possibility, only the narrowest of
by the rational processes of science and slices is designated “normal,” while the
rest is vilified as “perverted.” We are fed in an instant—moments at which entire
huge doses of processed sexual imagery, universes are contained in a smile,
cleansed of “impurities”—and nutrition. a gesture, a touch, the connection
Not surprisingly, we come away hungry, that flows from one eye to another.
often not even knowing what it is we On film these nuances can be frozen
have been denied. and then experienced over and over
With the heart of the sexual matter again, gradually revealing aspects of
condemned to silence, people image sex the original moment previously unseen
in the most trivial of ways: Sex equals or unappreciated. By looking at these
heterosexual, monogamous intercourse. photos, we get to see things about the
Sex equals the pursuit of orgasm. Sex subjects (and ourselves) we would never
equals neurons (the more the better) see otherwise. If we dare.
engaged in rapid fire. We need language
and imagery that help us to engage sex PHOTOGRAPHS THAT TEST THE
in all its richness, depth, and diversity, LIMITS.
despite the cultural prohibitions. We Michael Rosen’s honest, unsimplified
need images of the sort that are in this photographs of untidy, unsanitized,
book. unconventional sexuality intentionally
Photographing sex is no simple push us up against any number of limits
matter. How does one photograph we have set for the sexual matrix, as
sex with a complexity that is truly well as limits that have been set for us
artistic? What about sex is important by others. Happily, they push us against
to photograph? What about sex can be these limits with a friendly, rather than
photographed? What illumination can an aggressive, touch. Look at this,
artful photographic attention bring to they say. What do you think of this?
sex? Can the private intimacy of sex Have you ever imagined this? Have you
happen in front of a camera? How do ever felt like this? Most dearly, these
photographer and model(s) work toward photographs test the limits of what is
such a goal? allowed and what is forbidden, as art and
The part of sex that matters most as sexual practice. More significantly
cannot be directed to happen. The perhaps, these photos also test the
best you can do is to create hospitable limits of what is known and what is
circumstances and hope for the best. knowable about sex, and the limits of
Trust is essential. Respect. Leave all what can be communicated from one
judgment well outside the door. Sexual person to another about something as
feelings are tender, personal, and intensely individual and interior as the
painfully subject to ridicule. They expose sexual complexities. The power of these
themselves only when they sense they photographs lies in how much of what is
will be honored, appreciated, valued, and happening for the subjects is captured for
understood on their own terms. us to see.
Sexual magic appears and disappears As with sex itself, these photographs
constantly surprise us. The silenced them cannot be denied, despite the parts
sexual elements reappear, but do not of us that would rather hold on to less
confirm our expectations of them. Often troubling preconceptions. Love is here,
we can see ourselves in the subjects, as well as joy, intimacy, connection,
even when who they are or what they passion, tenderness, and beauty. Also
are doing is foreign to us. We find smiles fear, mystery, ecstasy, a vibrant aliveness,
and laughter where we expected snakes and hints of some very unscientific
and toads. We find warm, open, loving knowledge and wisdom. When we look
human beings where we thought there at the faces in Michael’s sexual portraits,
could only be demons and psychopaths. when we look at the connections in his
We find complex emotional matrices photographs of sexual activity in progress,
rather than one-dimensional simplicities. we see quite simply that people do all
A sense of universality emerges; the sorts of different sexual things, alone
sense of Otherness diminishes. This is and together. We also see that they have
an essential part of Michael’s mission, marvelous fun doing what they do. We
and an important facet of his skill: his see, in the end, that—despite all the
ability to humanize sexualities that are bugaboos—sex simply is.
more commonly reduced to alienating Nothing is true; everything is
stereotypes. We respond to these photos permitted. When we suspend the fixities,
with parts of ourselves that are not used the realm of what becomes available to
to being disturbed or exposed, parts that us—sexually and otherwise—is incredibly
live deep in the belly of the unconscious. vast. Fiercely, gently, proudly, quietly,
We are drawn in and taken aback the people in Michael’s images say to
simultaneously; intrigue and discomfort us, “Here I am. This is my body. This is
swirl in an unfamiliar mix. Perhaps we who I am as a sexual being.” We witness
resonate with some images more strongly one person after another claiming their
than we would have expected. We’re not sexuality as their own—retrieving the
sure what it is that these photos help us, birthright of their sexual natures from the
encourage us, perhaps force us, to feel. state, from the church, from parents and
We’re not sure whether it’s all right to be neighbors, from guilt and shame, from
fascinated by what we see. fear and pain, from the constraints of
What makes Michael’s photographs imposed gender and sexual convention—
so powerful and subversive is that the inviting us to do the same.
simple, friendly pleasure contained in —David Steinberg, July 1994
Asshole, 1993

Plate 5

You might also like