Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Full Chapter The King Arthur Baking Company S All Purpose Baker S Companion Revised and Updated King Arthur Baking Company PDF
Full Chapter The King Arthur Baking Company S All Purpose Baker S Companion Revised and Updated King Arthur Baking Company PDF
https://textbookfull.com/product/on-baking-a-textbook-of-baking-
and-pastry-fundamentals-3rd-updated-edition-labensky/
https://textbookfull.com/product/handbook-of-arthurian-romance-
king-arthur-s-court-in-medieval-european-literature-1st-edition-
leah-tether/
https://textbookfull.com/product/on-baking-a-textbook-of-baking-
and-pastry-fundamentals-fourth-edition-sarah-r-labensky/
Arthur Schopenhauer The World as Will and Presentation
1st Edition Arthur Schopenhauer
https://textbookfull.com/product/arthur-schopenhauer-the-world-
as-will-and-presentation-1st-edition-arthur-schopenhauer/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-gryphon-king-s-consort-
golden-kingdom-1-jenn-burke/
https://textbookfull.com/product/stephen-king-a-primary-
bibliography-of-the-world-s-most-popular-author-2013-revised-
edition-edition-brooks/
https://textbookfull.com/product/smith-s-textbook-of-
endourology-2-volume-set-arthur-d-smith/
https://textbookfull.com/product/richard-ii-king-of-
england-1377-1399-a-true-king-s-fall-1st-edition-kathryn-warner/
Copyright © 2021, 2003 by King Arthur Baking Company, Inc.
All food photography and styling by Liz Neily, unless otherwise
noted:
Crunchy Cornmeal Waffles by Posie Brien, Croissants de Boulanger
by Erica Allen,
and Black and White Cookies by Shilpa Iyer.
Previous edition published under the title The King Arthur Flour
Baker’s Companion:
The All-Purpose Baking Cookbook
All rights reserved
For information about permission to reproduce selections from this
book, write to
Permissions, The Countryman Press, 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY
10110
For information about special discounts for bulk purchases, please
contact
W. W. Norton Special Sales at specialsales@wwnorton.com or 800-
233-4830
978-1-68268-617-1
978-1-68268-618-8 (ebk.)
The King Arthur Baking Company
All-Purpose Baker’s Companion
INTRODUCTION
A NOTE ON MEASURING
HIGH-ALTITUDE BAKING
BREAKFASTS
QUICK BREADS
YEAST BREADS
SOURDOUGH
CAKES
INGREDIENTS
TOOLS
ILLUSTRATIONS INSERT
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
INDEX
Introduction
Measuring Flour
Our first plea is that you buy and use a scale (see Tools,
page 541).
For volume or weight measuring, have on hand a couple
of sets of measuring spoons. It’s easier to measure small
amounts—a teaspoon, a tablespoon—with spoons even if
you have a scale. There are some sets available that
measure from 1/8 teaspoon through ½ to 1 tablespoon.
There are also sets containing odd sizes. It’s useful to
have more than one set (see Tools, page 539).
Have two kinds of measuring cups, one that measures
flush at the top edge for dry ingredients and one that has
a lip at the top for liquids. There are some liquid
measures available that also have metric measurements
on one side. These can be useful when using cookbooks
from other parts of the world.
Other important measuring devices are thermometers and
timers (see Tools, pages 540 and 542). Because ovens
have their own personalities, a thermometer that helps
you know what’s going on inside is important. Oven
temperatures can vary considerably, as can oven
thermostats, which drive how long your oven “cools”
before the heating element kicks in again. Thermometers
can also measure the temperature of a dough, batters,
syrups, and finished goods.
Even with the most accurate of measurements, such
variables as humidity, altitude, the fat content of the milk
you use, and the mineral content of your water all are
going to affect your baking. Ultimately your eyes and
hands, when they have had enough experience, will make
many of your measuring decisions.
Measuring Hints
Measuring by Volume
Measuring by Weight
A TRANSLATION OF OLD-FASHIONED
AMERICAN MEASUREMENTS
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
of Insects get their living off this industrious creature. Another bee,
Stelis nasuta, breaks open the cells after they have been completely
closed and places its own eggs in them, and then again closes the
cells with mortar. The larvae of this Stelis develop more rapidly than
do those of the Chalicodoma, so that the result of this shameless
proceeding is that the young one of the legitimate proprietor—as we
human beings think it—is starved to death, or is possibly eaten up as
a dessert by the Stelis larvae, after they have appropriated all the
pudding.
The bees of the genus Anthidium are known to possess the habit of
making nests of wool or cotton, that they obtain from plants growing
at hand. We have one species of this genus of bees in Britain; it
sometimes may be seen at work in the grounds of our Museum at
Cambridge: it is referred to by Gilbert White, who says of it, in his
History of Selborne: "There is a sort of wild bee frequenting the
garden-campion for the sake of its tomentum, which probably it turns
to some purpose in the business of nidification. It is very pleasant to
see with what address it strips off the pubes, running from the top to
the bottom of a branch, and shaving it bare with the dexterity of a
hoop-shaver. When it has got a bundle, almost as large as itself, it
flies away, holding it secure between its chin and its fore legs." The
species of this genus are remarkable as forming a conspicuous
exception to the rule that in bees the female is larger than the male.
The species of Anthidium do not form burrows for themselves, but
either take advantage of suitable cavities formed by other Insects in
wood, or take possession of deserted nests of other bees or even
empty snail-shells. The workers in cotton, of which our British
species A. manicatum is one, line the selected receptacle with a
beautiful network of cotton or wool, and inside this place a finer layer
of the material, to which is added some sort of cement that prevents
the honied mass stored by the bees in this receptacle from passing
out of it. A. diadema, one of the species that form nests in hollow
stems, has been specially observed by Fabre; it will take the cotton
for its work from any suitable plant growing near its nest, and does
not confine itself to any particular natural order of plants, or even to
those that are indigenous to the South of France. When it has
brought a ball of cotton to the nest, the bee spreads out and
arranges the material with its front legs and mandibles, and presses
it down with its forehead on to the cotton previously deposited; in this
way a tube of cotton is constructed inside the reed; when withdrawn,
the tube proved to be composed of about ten distinct cells arranged
in linear fashion, and connected firmly together by means of the
outer layer of cotton; the transverse divisions between the chambers
are also formed of cotton, and each chamber is stored with a mixture
of honey and pollen. The series of chambers does not extend quite
to the end of the reed, and in the unoccupied space the Insect
accumulates small stones, little pieces of earth, fragments of wood
or other similar small objects, so as to form a sort of barricade in the
vestibule, and then closes the tube by a barrier of coarser cotton
taken frequently from some other plant, the mullein by preference.
This barricade would appear to be an ingenious attempt to keep out
parasites, but if so, it is a failure, at any rate as against Leucospis,
which insinuates its eggs through the sides, and frequently destroys
to the last one the inhabitants of the fortress. Fabre states that these
Anthidium, as well as Megachile, will continue to construct cells
when they have no eggs to place in them; in such a case it would
appear from his remarks that the cells are made in due form and the
extremity of the reed closed, but no provisions are stored in the
chambers.
The first cell thus made is stored with pollen and honey, and an egg
is deposited. Then a barrier has to be constructed to close this
chamber; the material used for the barrier is the pith of the stem, and
the Insect cuts the material required for the purpose from the walls of
the second chamber; the excavation of the second chamber is, in
fact, made to furnish the material for closing up the first cell. In this
way a chain of cells is constructed, their number being sometimes as
many as fifteen. The mode in which the bees, when the
transformations of the larvae and pupae have been completed,
escape from the chain of cells, has been the subject of much
discussion, and errors have arisen from inference being allowed to
take the place of observation. Thus Dufour, who noted this same
mode of construction and arrangement in another Hymenopteron
(Odynerus nidulator), perceived that there was only one orifice of
exit, and also that the Insect that was placed at the greatest distance
from this was the one that, being the oldest of the series, might be
expected to be the first ready to emerge; and as the other cocoons
would necessarily be in the way of its getting out, he concluded that
the egg that was last laid produced the first Insect ready for
emergence. Fabre tested this by some ingenious experiments, and
found that this was not the case, but that the Insects became ready
to leave their place of imprisonment without any reference to the
order in which the eggs were laid, and he further noticed some very
curious facts with reference to the mode of emergence of Osmia
tridentata. Each Insect, when it desires to leave the bramble stem,
tears open the cocoon in which it is enclosed, and also bites through
the barrier placed by the mother between it and the Insect that is
next it, and that separates it from the orifice of exit. Of course, if it
happen to be the outside one of the series it can then escape at
once; but if it should be one farther down in the Indian file it will not
touch the cocoon beyond, but waits patiently, possibly for days; if it
then still find itself confined it endeavours to escape by squeezing
past the cocoon that intervenes between it and liberty, and by biting
away the material at the sides so as to enlarge the passage; it may
succeed in doing this, and so get out, but if it fail to make a side
passage it will not touch the cocoons that are in its way. In the
ordinary course of events, supposing all to go well with the family, all
the cocoons produce their inmates in a state for emergence within a
week or two, and so all get out. Frequently, however, the emergence
is prevented by something having gone wrong with one of the outer
Insects, in which case all beyond it perish unless they are strong
enough to bite a hole through the sides of the bramble-stem. Thus it
appears that whether a particular Osmia shall be able to emerge or
not depends on two things—(1) whether all goes well with all the
other Insects between it and the orifice, and (2) whether the Insect
can bite a lateral hole or not; this latter point also largely depends on
the thickness of the outer part of the stem of the bramble. Fabre's
experiments on these points have been repeated, and his results
confirmed by Nicolas.
The fact that an Osmia would itself perish rather than attack the
cocoon of its brother or sister is certainly very remarkable, and it
induced Fabre to make some further experiments. He took some
cocoons containing dead specimens of Osmia, and placed them in
the road of an Osmia ready for exit, and found that in such case the
bee made its way out by demolishing without any scruple the
cocoons and dead larvae that intervened between it and liberty. He
then took some other reeds, and blocked the way of exit with
cocoons containing living larvae, but of another species of
Hymenoptera. Solenius vagus and Osmia detrita were the species
experimented on in this case, and he found that the Osmia
destroyed the cocoon and living larvae of the Solenius, and so made
its way out. Thus it appears that Osmia will respect the life of its own
species, and die rather than destroy it, but has no similar respect for
the life of another species.
In the genus Bombus the phenomena connected with the social life
are more similar to what we find among wasps than to what they are
in the genus Apis. The societies come to an end at the close of the
season, a few females live through the winter, and each of these
starts a new colony in the following spring. Males, females and
workers exist, but the latter are not distinguished by any good
characters from the females, and are, in fact, nothing but more or
less imperfect forms thereof; whereas in Apis the workers are
distinguished by structural characters not found in either of the true
sexes.
Supposing all to go well with the colony it increases very greatly, but
its prosperity is checked in the autumn; at this period large numbers
of males are produced as well as new queens, and thereafter the
colony comes to an end, only a few fertilised females surviving the
winter, each one to commence for herself a new colony in the
ensuing spring.
Although the species of Bombus are not comparable with the hive-
bee in respect of the perfection and intelligent nature of their work,
yet they are very industrious Insects, and the construction of the
dwelling-places of the subterranean species is said to be carried out
in some cases with considerable skill, a dome of wax being formed
as a sort of roof over the brood cells. Some work even at night. Fea
has recorded the capture of a species in Upper Burmah working by
moonlight, and the same industry may be observed in this country if
there be sufficient heat as well as light. Godart, about 200 years ago,
stated that a trumpeter-bee is kept in some nests to rouse the
denizens to work in the morning: this has been treated as a fable by
subsequent writers, but is confirmed in a circumstantial manner by
Hoffer, who observed the performance in a nest of B. ruderatus in his
laboratory. On the trumpeter being taken away its office was the
following morning filled by another individual The trumpeting was
done as early as three or four o'clock in the morning, and it is by no
means impossible that the earliness of the hour may have had
something to do with the fact that for 200 years no one confirmed the
old naturalist's observation.
The Bombus and Psithyrus live together on the best terms, and it
appears probable that the latter do the former no harm beyond
appropriating a portion of their food supplies. Schmiedeknecht says
they are commensals, not parasites; but it must be admitted that
singularly few descriptions of the habits and life-histories of these
interesting Insects have been recorded. Hoffer has, however, made
a few direct observations which confirm, and at the same time make
more definite, the vague ideas that have been generally prevalent
among entomologists. He found and took home a nest of Bombus
variabilis, which contained also a female of Psithyrus campestris, so
that he was able to make observations on the two. The Psithyrus
was much less industrious than the Bombus, and only left the nest
somewhat before noon, returning home again towards evening; after
about a month this specimen became still more inactive, and passed
entire days in the nest, occupying itself in consuming the stores of
honey of its hosts, of which very large quantities were absorbed, the
Psithyrus being much larger than the host-bee. The cells in which
the young of the Psithyrus are hatched are very much larger than
those of the Bombus, and, it may therefore be presumed, are formed
by the Psithyrus itself, for it can scarcely be supposed that the
Bombus carries its complaisance so far as to construct a cell
specially adapted to the superior stature of its uninvited boarder.
When a Psithyrus has been for some time a regular inhabitant of a
nest, the Bombus take its return home from time to time as a matter
of course, displaying no emotion whatever at its entry. Occasionally
Hoffer tried the introduction of a Psithyrus to a nest that had not
previously had one as an inmate. The new arrival caused a great
hubbub among the Bombus, which rushed to it as if to attack it, but
did not do so, and the alarm soon subsided, the Psithyrus taking up
the position in the nest usually affected by the individuals of the
species. On introducing a female Psithyrus to a nest of Bombus in
which a Psithyrus was already present as an established guest, the
latter asserted its rights and drove away the new comer. Hoffer also
tried the experiment of placing a Psithyrus campestris in the nest of
Bombus lapidarius—a species to which it was a stranger;
notwithstanding its haste to fly away, it was at once attacked by the
Bombus, who pulled it about but did not attempt to sting it.