Hypothesis

There is no significant difference among the different treatments of banana peel and

carrot siomai in terms of taste, texture, aroma and appearance perceived by the respondents.

Objectives of the Study

This study was conducted to determine the acceptability of banana peel and carrot siomai.

The objectives are the following;

1. To determine the most acceptable treatments of banana peel carrot siomai in terms of

taste, texture, color and appearance.

2. To determine the marketability of banana peel as alternative stuffing in siomai.

3. To determine the projected return of investment.

4. To determine the shelf life of the product.

T1 T2
Taste 8.13 8.28
Texture 8.17 8.28
Appearance 8.20 8.25
Color 8.20 8.08
Aroma 8.32 8.27
Average 8.20 8.23

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Averag Varianc
Groups Count Sum e e
Column 1 5 41.02 8.204 0.00503
Column 2 5 41.16 8.232 0.00737

ANOVA
Source of
Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.00196 1 0.00196 0.316129 0.589346 5.317655
Within Groups 0.0496 8 0.0062
 Total 0.05156 9
Interpretation:
The table above reflected the computed F value (0.316129) that is lower than the critical
value (5.317655) at 0.05 significance level. This emphasized that there is a very low significant
difference between treatments. Hence, the null hypothesis, “there is no significant difference
among the different treatments of banana peel and carrot siomai in terms of taste, texture,
aroma and appearance perceived by the respondents” is accepted.

LSD: Not applicable.

Since the Least Significant Difference (LSD) test determines the lowest significant
difference between two means, it is only employed in cases where the null hypothesis is rejected.
It is sufficient to assume that the means of the various treatments are the same because the null
hypothesis is accepted.