You are on page 1of 30

Republic of the Philippines

Bulacan State University

College of Architecture and Fine Arts

City of Malolos, Bulacan

Tel (044) 919-7800 local 1049-1050

Email cafa@bulsu.edu.ph

PP 323

Professional Practice l: Building Laws

Final Project

“COMMON BUILDING VIOLATIONS IN BALAGTAS, BULACAN”

Submitted by:

BORELA, Jerard Isaac

CASTRO, Joenard, A

CUARENTAS, Kate Rhommuel, D.C.

DELA CRUZ, King Rich, P.

DELAS ALAS, Jay-em R.

DIAZ, Ace Jefferiel, P.

BSAR 3B

May 15, 2024


INTRODUCTION
Balagtas, a town located in the province of Bulacan, Philippines holds a
heritage and historical importance. Formerly called Bigaa it was later renamed
in tribute, to Francisco Balagtas, a Filipino poet. Balagtas stands as a
testament to the history of the country. Serves as a representation of its
changing architectural style. The town features homes, historical sites and
traditional buildings that showcase a fusion of American and indigenous
Filipino architectural influences.

Nevertheless with rapid urbanization taking place in Balagtas


challenges have arisen in the realms of architecture and urban planning.
Various infractions against established standards and rules have surfaced,
prompting concerns about preserving its identity maintaining the integrity of its
built environment and ensuring the well being of its inhabitants.

The main objective of this study is to examine the types and scope of
these violations within Balagtas. The research will focus on cases where local
or international architectural guidelines have been breached. These
transgressions range from modifications to heritage structures to non
adherence to zoning regulations building ordinances and environmental
policies. Each instance will be thoroughly. Analyzed to uncover their root
causes and understand their impact, on the community.

The impact of those violations on Balagtas's architectural integrity is


profound. Historical buildings, which function tangible hyperlinks to the
metropolis's beyond, are vulnerable to losing their authenticity and
significance. Unauthorized adjustments can lead to the irreversible lack of
architectural information and ancient price. Furthermore, non-compliant new
buildings can disrupt the harmonious aesthetic of the city, introducing
incongruous factors that detract from its cultural landscape.

This research will also explore the social and monetary effects of
architectural violations in Balagtas. Poorly regulated creation practices can
cause dangerous dwelling situations, negatively affecting the properly-being
of residents. Economically, the degradation of historical past sites can
decrease the metropolis's appeal to vacationers and buyers, potentially stifling
financial boom and development opportunities.

By examining styles of non-compliance and figuring out key


stakeholders involved, this study seeks to offer comprehensive insights into
the basis reasons of architectural violations in Balagtas. It will don't forget
factors including insufficient enforcement of regulations, lack of awareness
among developers and belongings owners, and the pressures of rapid
urbanization. The findings goal to inform policy tips and strategic moves that
could help mitigate these troubles.

Ultimately, this research aspires to strike a balance between


modernization and the upkeep of Balagtas's specific architectural historical
past. It underscores the importance of adopting sustainable and culturally
respectful architectural practices that honor the metropolis's ancient legacy
whilst accommodating contemporary wishes. Through this balanced approach,
the purpose is to make sure that destiny tendencies in Balagtas make
contributions definitely to its historical, aesthetic, and socio-monetary value,
safeguarding its identification for generations to come back. Insights and
guidelines derived from this observe could be critical in selling sustainable
and culturally respectful architectural practices, helping Balagtas navigate its
development in a way that honors its wealthy history and guarantees a
harmonious future.
This photo was taken on May 9, 2024 at 12:24pm, and the location of
the photo is at Balagtas, Bulacan Central Luzon. It is a photo of a post
that causes “Obstructions in Sidewalks”. The subject is in the sidewalk
between a Mototrade and Japan surplus and also in front of a Mall in Balagtas,
Bulacan near the marketplace of the municipality.
RULE NO VIII - LIGHT AND VENTILATION

According to National Building Code of the Philippines(NBCP P.D


No.1096) and in GUIDELINES ON EASEMENTS, VIEW
CORRIDORS/SIGHT LINES, STREETS/ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (RROW),
SIDEWALKS, ARCADES, BASEMENTS, LOTS, AND PUBLIC
BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES part D. Which are the guidelines in sidewalks
and, Arcades No.13 or the “Obstructions in Sidewalks'' which says that no
obstruction of any type, whether open or arcaded, is permitted on sidewalks
under any circumstances. This specifically refers to any kind of commercial
signage and building that blocks pedestrian traffic or sight lines along the
sidewalk.
This indicates a strict prohibition against any objects or structures that impede
the flow of pedestrian traffic on sidewalks. This includes physical barriers,
such as large signs, merchandise displays, or any other objects that may
block the path of pedestrians. This is the common problem that you can see in
the sidewalks that violate the National Building Code of the Philippines(NBCP).
Blockage pedestrian traffic or sight lines along the sidewalk. This reinforces
the strictness of the rule, indicating that there are no exemptions or
allowances for obstructions, regardless of the reason or justification. The aim
of this statement is to prioritize the accessibility and safety of sidewalks for
pedestrians by maintaining clear pathways and unobstructed sightlines. It
underscores the importance or urban planning and design that prioritizes
pedestrian needs and promotes walkability in public spaces.

Also, there is no use of setback in the structure near the sidewalk


which also violates the rule in SECTION 804. Sizes and Dimensions of Courts.
In this statement, it indicates that the required dimensions of courts and yards
depend on factors like building usage, construction type, and height. However,
regardless of these factors, all courts and yards must have a minimum
horizontal dimension of at least 2.00 meters. Additionally, every inner court
must have access to a street or yard, either through a passage with a
minimum width of 1.20 meters or via a door leading through a room or rooms.
One potential solution to address this issue is to establish a standard setback
requirement for structures that currently violate sidewalk regulations. By
mandating a setback, the sidewalk would effectively become wider, creating
additional space for pedestrians and allowing for the relocation of any
obstructions to comply with the standard position outlined in the law.
Implementing a standard setback requirement would involve determining a
uniform distance that structures must be set back from the edge of the
sidewalk. This setback distance could vary depending on factors such as the
type of building, its usage, and local zoning regulations. Once the setback
requirement is established,
property owners or tenants with
structures encroaching onto the
sidewalk would need to adjust their
buildings accordingly to comply
with the new setback distance.
This might involve physically
moving the structure back,
redesigning the building layout, or
implementing alternative solutions
to ensure compliance while
maintaining functionality. In
addition to providing a solution for
existing violations, incorporating a
standard setback requirement into
urban planning and development
regulations can help prevent future
encroachments onto sidewalks.
This proactive approach can
contribute to creating safer, more
accessible pedestrian
environments and enhance overall urban livability.

This photo was taken on May 9, 2024 at 12:53pm, and the location is at
Balagtas, Bulacan Central Luzon, in front of the wet market of balagtas and
also a public school. It is a photo of a sidewalk that is not elevated and doesn't
use a “Curb” for the safety of pedestrians.

BP 344: ACCESSIBILITY LAW


According to Batasang
Pambansa Bilang 344(BP 334:
ACCESSIBILITY LAW) in
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
FOR ACCESSIBILITY
ILLUSTRATION FOR
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, it
stated that Walkways and
sidewalks must be at least 1.20
meters wide. The ideal cross
gradient for the
walkways/sidewalks should be
1:100. or 1% and also sidewalks
and pathways should, if possible,
have a gradient that is no
steeper than 1:20 or
5%.

This indicates that the violation of the said sidewalks violates tons of rules and
regulations of the BP 344: ACCESSIBILITY LAW. According to BP 344,
sidewalks must adhere to a minimum width of 1.20 meters to ensure
adequate space for pedestrian movement, particularly for those with
disabilities or mobility impairments. The sidewalk in question falls short of this
requirement, providing only 1 meter of space. wheelchairs or walkers. In
addition to width requirements, BP 344 stipulates that sidewalks must
maintain a standard gradient of 5% or less. This gradient ensures ease of
traversal for pedestrians and minimizes the risk of slips, trips, and falls,
especially for those with mobility challenges. However, the photograph
suggests that the sidewalk does not adhere to this standard gradient,
potentially exposing pedestrians to hazards associated with uneven surfaces
and steep inclines.

To address the violation of the sidewalk's width requirement under BP


344, several solutions can be considered. One solution is to widen the
sidewalk to meet the minimum width of 1.20 meters mandated by BP 344.
This may involve reallocating space from adjacent properties, reducing the
width of road lanes, or redesigning the streetscape to accommodate a wider
pedestrian pathway. If the sidewalk has an excessive gradient, resurfacing the
surface to make it smoother and repositioning any sections with steep inclines
can help bring it into compliance with the standard gradient of 5% or less. This
may involve leveling uneven surfaces, filling in gaps, and ensuring a gradual
slope to minimize the risk of slips, trips, and falls. In addition Poor drainage
can contribute to uneven surfaces and erosion, leading to steep gradients on
sidewalks. Improving drainage infrastructure, such as installing drains or
redirecting runoff water away from the sidewalk, can help prevent erosion and
maintain a more consistent surface gradient.
These photos were taken on May 9, 2024 at 12:40 pm, located at
Balagtas Public (Wet) Market. The structure that is shown belongs to section
701 Group E, Division 2 - Wholesale and Retail Stores

According to SECTION 1001. General Requirements, RULE X –


BUILDING PROJECTION OVER PUBLIC STREETS, of the P.D. 1096. It is
stated that No part of any building or structure or any of its appendages, shall
project beyond the building line except as provided herein. Wherein there are
canopies extending beyond the building structure.

In order to guarantee safety, compliance, and quality throughout the


project, it would be helpful to adhere to PD 1096, the Philippine National
Building Code, which eliminates the canopies and transforms them into
firewalls. Furthermore, in the event that the building on the opposite side is
completely destroyed by fire and may collapse entirely, firewalls offer
protection for one structure or a section of a building.
These photos were taken on May 9, 2024 at 12:55 pm, located at Balagtas
Public (Wet) Market. The structure that is shown belongs to section 701
Group E, Division 2 - Wholesale and Retail Stores

According to SECTION
304. Issuance of
Building Permit, RULE
III - PERMITS AND
INSPECTION, of the P.D.
1096. It is stated that the
Owner/Permittee shall put
a Building Permit sign
which complies with the
prescribed dimensions
and information, which
shall remain posted on the construction site for the duration of the
construction. (Figs. III.4. and
III.5).

It is crucial that the Building Permit sign, which displays all relevant
information, be kept up to date during the construction phase in accordance
with the standards provided.
Addressing Urban Parking Violations: Legal Framework and
Enforcement Strategies in the Balagtas, Bulacan

On May 3, 2024, at precisely 8:13 am, a photograph was captured at


the RCBC Balagtas branch situated along MacArthur Highway in Balagtas,
Bulacan. The image vividly portrays an unconventional sight—a parking lot
occupying the space in front of the RCBC establishment, defying the standard
size and layout typically associated with such areas. This unique utilization of
space appears to have been prompted by the need to overcome the setback
posed by the adjacent sidewalk (bangketa). Furthermore, a noticeable
absence of proper setback and frontage regulations adds to the distinctive
character of the scene. This innovative adaptation of space not only serves a
functional purpose but also raises questions about urban planning, land use
policies, and the dynamic ways in which communities navigate and repurpose
their surroundings to meet their needs.
Parking violations in urban
areas pose significant challenges to
pedestrian safety, accessibility, and
the preservation of public space. This
research investigates the legal
framework and enforcement
strategies pertaining to three key
parking violations in the Philippines:
Violation in Improper Setback of
Commercial Building, Non-Standard
Parking Lot, and Violations in
Occupying the Sidewalk (Bangketa).

Violation in Improper Setback of Commercial Building:


Republic Act No. 7279 - Urban Development and Housing Act (UDHA)
of 1992:

Article III: Planning and Zoning – Land Use Planning – Principles and
Procedures for Implementation
Article IV: Strategies, Mechanisms and Incentives for Housing
Development
Republic Act No. 7160 - Local Government Code of 1991:
Title 1. Basic Principles
Section 2 Local Government Units
Title 3: Local Government Units and Special Bodies
Republic Act No. 9646 - Real Estate Service Act of the Philippines:
Article II: Practice of Real Estate Service
Non-Standard Parking Lot:
Republic Act No. 7160 - Local Government Code of 1991:

Title 1. Basic Principles


Section 2 Local Government Units
Title 3: Local Government Units and Special Bodies
Republic Act No. 7277 - Magna Carta for Disabled Persons:
Article VIII: Access to Public Transportation
Republic Act No. 4136 - Land Transportation and Traffic Code
Violations in Occupying the Sidewalk (Bangketa):
Republic Act No. 7160 - Local Government Code of 1991:

Title 1. Basic Principles


Section 2 Local Government Units
Title 3: Local Government Units and Special Bodies
Republic Act No. 7277 - Magna Carta for Disabled Persons:
Article VIII: Access to Public Transportation
Republic Act No. 4136 - Land Transportation and Traffic Code
Enforcement Measures:
Enforcement measures for these violations involve the deployment of
traffic personnel, imposition of penalties, and collaboration with law
enforcement agencies. These measures aim to deter violations, promote
compliance, and safeguard pedestrian safety and accessibility.

Conclusion:
By examining the legal framework and enforcement measures
pertaining to parking violations, this research underscores the importance of
addressing urban parking challenges to create safer, more accessible, and
pedestrian-friendly environments in Philippine cities. Effective enforcement,
public awareness campaigns, and community engagement are essential for
promoting responsible parking practices and enhancing urban livability.

To tackle urban parking challenges in the Philippines, a range of


solutions has been proposed. Designated parking areas are essential, marked
clearly and potentially with time limits to efficiently manage short-term parking.
Multi-level parking structures in residential and commercial areas can
optimize space usage, catering to specific needs like employee or resident
parking. Implementing parking permits and enforcement mechanisms is
crucial, involving traffic enforcers and technology to ensure fair access to
parking.

Pedestrian-friendly design elements, including broad sidewalks and


wheelchair ramps, prioritize safety and accessibility. Alternative transportation
infrastructure like bike lanes and bus stations encourages active transport and
reduces reliance on cars. Smart parking solutions, such as sensor-based
platforms, enhance efficiency and reduce congestion.

Public awareness campaigns educate drivers on regulations and


promote responsible parking. Mixed-use development projects with integrated
parking help distribute demand and optimize land use. Green parking design
principles minimize environmental impact.

Adaptive reuse of spaces for parking addresses demand while


repurposing underutilized areas. Park-and-ride facilities encourage public
transport use. Valet parking services optimize space and reduce congestion.
Smart growth principles foster sustainable urban development.

Community engagement ensures parking solutions are inclusive and


responsive to local needs. Capacity building and technical assistance
enhance urban design capabilities. By implementing these solutions, the
Philippines can create safer, more accessible, and sustainable cities.
VIOLATIONS REGARDING PWD RAMPS UNDER REPUBLIC ACT 7277 -
MAGNA CARTA FOR DISABLED PERSONS

On the morning of May 3, 2024, at the Don Pedro S. Cayetano Sports


Center, located at 540 Bantayan St, Balagtas, 3016 Bulacan, a photograph
was taken precisely at 9:At 8.00 am. Brandishing a solemn aspect, this picture
clearly shows a disturbing observation involving the PWD (Persons With
Disabilities) ramp which is situated not far from here. Compared with standard
specifications, the PWD ramp exhibits the photo, which is quite possibly
largely accident-prone due to being dissimilar for people who utilize it as a
way of accessibility. This deviation from the standard design and protocols of
safety is a cause for concern about the safety and usability of the
infrastructure that is designed to facilitate the accessibility of persons with
disabilities. This poses a great challenge, and reasons of treatments need to
be found immediately so this problem can be eliminated, because, otherwise,
personal safety and wellness of all users are at great risk, and this may lead
to the violation of principles of accessibility and inclusiveness of public spaces.
Republic Act 7277, commonly
known as the Magna Carta for
Disabled Persons, serves as a
guideline for ensuring
accessibility and rights for
persons with disabilities
(PWDs). Violations related to
PWD ramps often stem from
non-compliance with
accessibility norms outlined in
this law. Key provisions
pertaining to PWD ramps and
relevant regulations include:

Section 5 - Equal Opportunity for Employment: While emphasizing equal


accessibility to public places, this section underscores the importance of
providing ramps in buildings and streets. Poorly designed ramps that hinder
equal access may breach this provision.

Section 7 - Architectural Accessibility: Mandates that government buildings,


institutions, establishments, and public utilities be designed and constructed
to be accessible to PWDs. Violations, such as structural deficiencies or
incorrect ramp elevations, may constitute breaches of this requirement.

Section 32 - Penalties for Violations: Although this paragraph does not specify
offenses like ramp elevation, it implies that violations of accessibility rules
could lead to fines according to this provision.

Accessibility Requirements: Both public and private sectors are obligated to


make their buildings accessible to PWDs, ensuring easy access to premises.
Specifications for Ramps: Ramps must adhere to regulations concerning
width, shape, surface texture, and handrail installation size to ensure safety
and usability.
Non-Discrimination: Republic Act 7277 prohibits discrimination against
physically challenged individuals, considering barriers to public spaces as
acts of injustice and code violation.
Penalties: Violations may incur penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment,
depending on the nature of the offense.
Universal Design Principles: The law advocates for universal design, aiming
to create inclusive spaces accommodating everyone regardless of disability.
Building Code Compliance: Building codes in the Philippines include
provisions for accessibility and PWD facilities, specifying technical features of
ramps to ensure safety and accessibility.
Permit and Inspection Requirements: Remodeling or installing PWD ramps
often requires permits from local governments, subject to inspection to ensure
compliance with regulations.
Public Awareness and Education:
The legislation emphasizes public involvement and education on PWD rights
and requirements. Establishments are encouraged to train staff on
accommodating PWDs and using PWD ramps properly.
Enforcement Mechanisms:
Government agencies overseeing disability accessibility laws may investigate
complaints of violations. Penalties for non-compliance may include fines,
closure orders, or legal action, depending on the severity and frequency of
violations.
SOLUTIONS FOR IMPROVING RAMP ACCESSIBILITY
Platform Installation:
Platforms and landings strategically placed along ramps offer breaks in incline,
enhancing safety and comfort for users. Ideal for locations where extending
ramp length is impractical, platforms minimize steepness and provide rest
areas. This solution proves beneficial for multi-story facilities or outdoor
environments with varied terrain.
Benefits:
Platform installation reduces the steepness of ramps, ensuring safety and
comfort for users, while also offering convenient rest areas. By minimizing
slope, this solution addresses challenges posed by elevation changes within
limited space, promoting accessibility and usability in diverse environments.
Handrail and Guardrail Adjustment:
Evaluation and adjustment of handrails and guardrails along ramps ensure
adequate support and protection for users. Proper installation and alignment
of these safety features enhance stability and confidence during use,
especially important for individuals with limited mobility navigating changes in
elevation.
Benefits:
Adjusting handrails and guardrails improves functionality and safety of ramps,
facilitating stability and guidance for users. By aligning with regulatory
standards, these adjustments enhance accessibility and mitigate risks of
accidents or injuries, promoting inclusivity in built environments.

Surface Treatment:
Application of non-skid surface treatments to ramp surfaces enhances traction
and grip, reducing slip and trip hazards. Especially effective in outdoor
environments prone to weather variations, surface treatments improve safety
and usability for individuals with mobility impairments.

Benefits:
Surface treatments minimize slip and trip risks on ramps, making them safer
and more accessible for users. By providing better traction and grip, these
treatments enhance usability for individuals with mobility impairments,
encouraging independent navigation and promoting inclusivity.

These solutions address key aspects of ramp accessibility, ensuring


compliance with regulations and enhancing safety and usability for all users.
Through thoughtful design and implementation, ramps can become integral
components of inclusive built environments, fostering accessibility and
promoting equality for individuals with diverse mobility needs.
These photos were taken on May 03, 2024 at 08:45 AM, that is located at 428
Mc Arthur Hi-Way, Poblacion, Wawa, Balagtas Bulacan. The structure that is
shown belongs to section 701 Group E, Division 2 - Wholesale and Retail
Stores.

Violated Code: National Fire Code of the Philippines (IRR of RA 9514)


RULE 3 OF THE NATIONAL FIRE CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES (IRR OF
RA 9514)

According to the “Rule 3 of the National Fire Code of the Philippines (IRR of
RA 9514)”, Fire Wall. A wall designed to prevent the spread of fire, having a
fire resistance rating of not less than four (4) hours with sufficient structural
stability to remain standing even if construction on either side collapses under
fire conditions.

Moreover, as written on "The Glossary Section of the 2004 Revised


Implementing Rules and Regulations (RIRR) of P.D. No. 1096, the 1977
National Building Code of the Philippines (NBCP)" i.e. the main code insofar
as building design, construction, use and occupancy is concerned, defines the
“firewall” a reinforced masonry or reinforced concrete separator with the
appropriate fire-resistive rating and which shall be positioned between
dwelling units or between buildings/structures to maintain the fire integrity of
each building/structure. Firewalls, particularly those erected above or along
property lines, shall have absolutely no openings, except for permitted vent
wells and shall extend above the roof from 400 millimeters to 1000 millimeters.

The structure in the picture illustrate those that have failed the requirements
under Rule VIII, regarding Light and Ventilation, Section 808 of the National
Building Codes of the Philippines, within which no opening shall be permitted
upon or inside abutments including fire walls constructed on property lines,
except duly authorized vent wells. The above provision shall apply to new and
existing developments.

In order to ensure the safety of building occupants, it would be helpful to


adhere to PD 1096, the Philippine National Building Code, which all existing
openings on a firewall should be sealed completely to maintain the fire
integrity and significantly enhance the overall fire resistance of a structure.
These photos were taken on May 03, 2024 at 08:44 AM, that is located at 428
Mc Arthur Hi-Way, Poblacion, Wawa, Balagtas Bulacan. The structure that is
shown belongs to section 701 Group E, Division 2 - Wholesale and Retail
Stores.

Violated Code: Batasang Pambansa Bilang 344 (BP344) or Accessibility


Law RULE II - MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSIBILITY

According to "RULE II (2.7) of the BP 344" the Ramps shall be placed where
they will not pose as safety hazards. The slope of a ramp shall not exceed
1:12.

The length of ramps shall not exceed 6.0 m if the gradient is 1:12. When
longer ramps are required, they shall be separated by landings with a
minimum length of 1.50 meters. Also, a level area of not less than 1.80 m
shall be provided at the top and bottom of any ramp.
Ramps shall be equipped with curbs of about 50 mm high on exposed edges
and provided with handrails on both sides at 0.70 m and 0.90 m from the floor.

On the recent inspection, It revealed that the building doesn't comply with the
National Building Code of the Philippines and Accessibility Law. The main
issue is the lackness of or improperly designed ramps that can make it difficult
or even impossible for PWDs to enter or exit buildings and access public
spaces and compromise its overall accessibility and safety.

Furthermore, the potential solutions to address this issues is to incorporate


the minimum and standard requirements based from the Batasang Pambansa
344 (BP 344) such as providing handrails that are essential for people who
need to balance themselves while using a ramp which should be installed on
both sides of the ramp and have an appropriate height for users, adding
coloured textural indication at the top and bottom of the ramp which should be
placed to alert sightless people as to the location of the ramp, and
implementing a standard ramp requirements that would ensure consistent
accessibility for people with disabilities in buildings and public spaces and to
create safe and usable pathways.
VIOLATION ON NATIONAL BUILDING CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES
(Obstruction on sidewalks)

These pictures were captured on May 3, 2024, at 8:40 a.m. in Balagtas,

Bulacan, Central Luzon. They showed that an on-street terminal had been built on

the sidewalks in front of a school. This encroachment is against the law, as stated in

the Philippine National Building Code which forbids obstructions on sidewalks. The

law states that things like this on-street terminal shouldn't be able to block sidewalks.

To keep everyone safe especially the students we must take immediate action to

address this.
VIOLATION ON NATIONAL BUILDING CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES
(Obstruction on sidewalks)

The yellow tint indicates where the sidewalks are placed. In the Philippines,

violating the laws against obstruction on sidewalks can lead to problems. Since the

violation occurred near a school, it is unsafe for individuals particularly students to

cross to the opposite side of the road. It can result in accidents and make it difficult

for people with impairments and parents using strollers to get around. Therefore, if

you break the law, you may have to pay a fine or correct the situation.

GUIDELINES ON EASEMENTS, VIEW CORRIDORS/SIGHT LINES,

STREETS/ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (RROW), SIDEWALKS, ARCADES,

BASEMENTS, LOTS, AND PUBLIC BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES

D. SIDEWALKS (Obstruction on Sidewalks)

A. Under no circumstances shall obstruction of any kind be allowed on

sidewalks, whether open or arcaded. This specifically refers to all forms of


VIOLATION ON NATIONAL BUILDING CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES
(Obstruction on sidewalks)

commercial signs and commercial structures that impede sight lines or

pedestrian traffic along the sidewalk.

B. Planted areas forming part of the sidewalk or arcade shall not be fenced in to

allow passage of pedestrians and disabled in transit.

SOLUTION TO THE ISSUE

The greatest way to deal with the problem of sidewalks getting blocked or

overtaken is to give public transportation a dedicated area for their terminal. Then,

the government should impose rules with greater severity, fining or ticketing

offenders and making sure that they are corrected right away. Furthermore, in order

to educate the public, local governments ought to run awareness campaigns

regarding their laws. This can be achieved by outreach programs, signs, and

instructional campaigns. Last but not least, developing comprehensive strategies to

manage sidewalk obstruction concerns while satisfying the interests of all

stakeholders can be achieved by collaboration with pertinent parties, such as school

administrations and transportation agencies.


VIOLATION ON NATIONAL BUILDING CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES
(SECTION 1008. Corner Buildings with Chaflans)

Photographed at 9 a.m. on May 3, 2024, in Balagtas, Bulacan, Central Luzon.

These images give information about the RCBC Balagtas branch's violation on

regulation and urban architecture principles. The primary topic of this study is the

mismatch between the observed structure and the standards of the Philippine

National Building Code. The lack of the required triangle space in corner lots

emphasizes the complex relationship between architectural aesthetics and statutory

compliance.
VIOLATION ON NATIONAL BUILDING CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES
(SECTION 1008. Corner Buildings with Chaflans)

These images reveal that the building does not comply with Section 1008 of

the Philippines' National Building Code. It lacks a 'chaflan', which is a triangular area

at the corner. Failure to abide by this regulation may impair drivers' ability to see

around corners when turning, which could result in accidents. Additionally, because

they might not be seen by cars, it might be more difficult for pedestrians to cross the

street safely.

SECTION 1008. Corner Buildings with Chaflans

A. Every corner building or solid fence on a public street or alley less than 3.60

meters in width shall be truncated at the corner. The face of the triangle so

formed shall be at right angle to the bisector of the angle of the intersection of

the street lines, provided, that in no case shall the length of the chaflan be

less than 4.00 meters.


VIOLATION ON NATIONAL BUILDING CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES
(SECTION 1008. Corner Buildings with Chaflans)

B. Corner buildings or solid wall fences to be built abutting property lines on

corners of public alley or street intersections shall be provided with chaflans to

afford a clear view.

C. If the building is arcaded, no chaflan is required notwithstanding that the width

of the public street or alley is less than 3.60 meters.

SOLUTION TO THE ISSUE

When a building fails to

incorporate the requisite triangle

space at its corner as required

by Section 1008 of the

Philippine’s National Building

Code, the authorities should

advise the owner that they must

provide it. The only way to avoid

this kind of issue is to hire a

professional which can help you

to prevent such problems in the

future. Always remember that it's

crucial to hire a professional to

make sure that construction projects are properly planned, constructed, and carried

out in accordance with quality standards and regulatory regulations. There's comfort

in knowing that your project is in good hands when you hire a professional. Knowing

that skilled professionals are managing every element of the process creates a

sense of reassurance and confidence in the project's success.

You might also like