You are on page 1of 9

ARTICLES

Effects of heat treatments on microstructure and properties of


nickel–aluminum bronze fabricated by centrifugal casting
Gaoyong Lina)
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China;
and Key Laboratory of Nonferrous Metal Materials Science and Engineering, Ministry of Education,
Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Hongyang Wang, Yuyong Wei, Zongpeng Zhang, and Ke Zhou
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

(Received 12 June 2016; accepted 18 November 2016)

A kind of nickel–aluminum bronze (Cu–10Al–4Fe–4Ni) prepared by centrifugal casting (CC) and


gravity casting (GC), respectively, were investigated. The results indicate that CC alloy, which is
totally different from GC alloy, consists of a, jI, jII, jIII, jIV, and b9 phases and the
microstructures of CC alloy shows nonuniformities from external to internal layer mainly because
the distribution of iron and nickel are influenced by centrifugal force. Besides, it is noted that
comprehensive mechanical properties of CC alloy are superior to those of GC alloy. Additionally,
heat treatments were performed on CC alloy. The results demonstrate the optimal heat treatment
is aging at 450 °C/1 h by air cooling after solution treated at 890 °C/1 h by water quench. The
ultimate tensile strength and hardness are increased by about 10% and 56%, respectively, and
wear resistance is also greatly improved. However, the elongation is decreased by 53%.

I. INTRODUCTION working on microstructure evolution of as-cast NAB


Nickel–aluminum bronze known as NAB alloy con- alloy. And then they put forward that higher cooling rate
tains 9–12% (wt pct) aluminum with additions of less significantly led to the increase of the b9 phase and finer
than 6% (wt pct) of Ni and Fe. Currently NAB has been Widmanstatten structure in the resulting microstructures,
extensively used where high strength, excellent wear, and which improved hardness of NAB. According to these
corrosion resistance are required.1–4 However, it is literature studies, many aspects have been focused on
difficult for NAB to be fabricated by traditional gravity NAB except changing casting methods so as to minimize
casting (GC) process because of the narrow range of the difficulties of fabrication and improve microstructure
solidification, the complex nature caused by additions distribution and mechanical properties.
of high-melting elements (such as Fe and Ni) and the Special casting process combined with appropriate
casting difficulties associated with the formation of heat treatment can perfect comprehensive performances
alumina in the melt.5 In addition, mechanical properties of as-cast alloy in a large extent.8–11 Centrifugal casting
of traditional as-cast NAB alloy are always difficult to (CC) is a kind of special casting process which has with
meet growing requirements. Many researchers have many advantages. Alloys fabricated by CC can obtain
mainly studied the phase transformation, hot working, higher tensile strength, hardness, and better wear resistance
heat treatment, and corrosion behavior of NAB alloy. compared with GC alloys.12–16 Owing to dramatically
Suresh and Rammurty6 carried out an extensive in- centrifugal force, the blisters, dross, and oxidate slag that
vestigation on the solidification structure as well as the are lighter than the melt will be forced to the innermost
effects of heat treatment and mold types on micro- surface, which can be eliminated by the following
structure of NAB (Cu–9Al–4Ni–4Fe) alloy produced machining. Therefore, CC definitely plays an important
in a sand mold and a die mold, respectively. The results role in the reduction of shrinkage porosity and the density
showed that the structure became considerably homog- of as-cast alloys can be significantly improved. G. Chirita
enous. Besides, the hardness and tensile strength were et al.12 revealed that centrifugal force affected phase
increased significantly after heat treatment. What’s more, distribution and morphologies and improved mechanical
J. Anantapong et al.7 investigated the effects of hot properties of the whole casting, especially the outer layer
where the centrifugal force was the highest. Nowadays,
CC has been widely used to fabricate alloys (zinc alloys
and aluminum alloys).
Contributing Editor: Jürgen Eckert
a)
Address all correspondence to this author. In the present work, microstructure and mechanical
e-mail: mater218@163.com properties of a kind of NAB (Cu–10Al–4Fe–4Ni) fabri-
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2016.455 cated by CC were investigated. For comparison, this kind

Downloaded from http:/www.cambridge.org/core. SUNY Stony Brook, on


J.14 Dec 2016
Mater. at 13:22:58,
Res., Ó to
2016 subject the Cambridge
Materials Core terms
Research of use,
Society available at http:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
2016 1
http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.455
G. Lin et al.: Effects of heat treatments on microstructure and properties of nickel–aluminum bronze fabricated by centrifugal casting

of NAB manufactured by GC was also under consider-


ation. What’s more, different heat treatments of CC alloy
were carried out and the optimal heat treatment process
was confirmed.

II. EXPERIMENTAL
A. Materials
NAB with a nominal composition of Cu–10Al–4Fe–4Ni
was studied, which was fabricated by CC process at a
rotational speed of 600 rpm and GC process, respectively.
The ingot was 100 mm high with the inner diameter of
200 mm and the outer diameter of 300 mm.
To study the effects of different heat treatments on
mechanical properties of CC alloys, heat treatments were
performed at various temperatures for 1 h. The solution FIG. 1. Hardness of CC alloy and GC alloy from external to internal
treated specimens were quenched into water from 830 °C layer.
to 950 °C at a constant interval of 30 °C, respectively,
after which microstructure was studied and mechanical
properties were examined to determine the optimal solu- indicates a declining tendency with oscillations from
tion temperature. On this basis, the specimens under the outer layer to innermost layer while those of GC alloy
optimal solution temperature were aged at 450 °C, are basically consistent. It is noted that the highest peak
490 °C, 530 °C, 570 °C, 610 °C, respectively. And then hardness (227.1 HV) is obtained in CC alloy compared to
air cooling to room temperature was done. GC alloy (194.3 HV). Additionally, hardness of CC alloy
from external surface to internal surface firstly increases
B. Characterization to the peak value (227.1 HV) due to vast majority of
Microstructure was characterized by optical micro- hard b9 phase or various j precipitates and then sharply
scope (POLYVAR-MET, Photonic Microdevices Inc., decreases corresponding to lots of soft a phase. What’s
Murray Hill, New Jersey), Tecnai G2 F20 transmission more, the internal layer has a relatively low hardness
electron microscope (TEM; FEI Corporation, Eindhoven, value (186.5 HV). In the external layer, various j pre-
The Netherlands) and Sirion 200 field emission scanning cipitates are dominant because more iron and nickel are
electron microscope (SEM; FEI Corporation) equipped conducive to precipitation of jIV phase caused by cen-
with an energy spectrum analysis (EDS) for element trifugal force. However, there are many hard b9 phases in
analysis. the internal layer although j precipitates are almost
Tensile tests were performed on MTS 810 (MTS disappeared. The inhomogeneous distribution of hard
Systems Corp., Eden Prairie, Minnesota) at a speed of b9, various j, and soft a phase interact with each other
1  10 3 s 1. Macrohardness tests were conducted on and consequently contribute to the large-scale fluctuation
a Brinell hardness tester (HB-3000B, Shandong Hualai existed in the hardness curve of CC alloy.
Testing Equipment Co. Ltd., Shandong, China), while the The microstructures of the different regions (centrifugal
microhardness tests were examined by a Vickers hardness radius rA 5 140 mm, rB 5 130 mm, and rC 5 120 mm)
tester (HVS-1000, Shanghai Lianer Testing Equipment in CC alloy are shown in Fig. 2(a). For comparison,
Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) at a load of 0.98 N with a those of GC ingot are also presented [Fig. 2(b)]. It can
holding time of 10 s. To evaluate the wear behavior, be seen that the microstructure morphologies of three
reciprocating wear tests were performed using a regions in CC alloy are significantly different mainly
tribometer system (UMT-3, Bruker Corporation, caused by dramatically centrifugal force and heat transfer
Billerica, Massachusetts) under a load of 100 N at a during solidification. In the external layer (region A), light
speed of 240 rpm for 1 h. phase and the gray phase are almost equivalent in size and
shape, and a number of small rosette-shaped or spherical
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION black particles dispersedly distribute among the whole
area, which makes contribution to higher peak hardness
A. Effects of CC on Cu–10Al–4Fe–4Ni (227.1 HV). In terms of region B and region C, the light
Microhardness tests were performed at several random phase tends to be large columnar and dendritic-shaped
positions of Cu–10Al–4Fe–4Ni from external to internal because of rotational molding. Additionally, black par-
layers and the results are briefly described as curves ticles are almost invisible. However, it is noted that GC
shown in Fig. 1. Obviously, hardness of CC alloy alloy consists of light phase, gray phase and a smaller

Downloaded
2 from http:/www.cambridge.org/core. SUNY Stony Brook, on 14 Dec 2016 at 13:22:58,
J. Mater. subject
Res., 2016 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at http:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.455
G. Lin et al.: Effects of heat treatments on microstructure and properties of nickel–aluminum bronze fabricated by centrifugal casting

number of rosette-shaped or spherical black particles, crystalline regions, resulting in inhomogeneous micro-
which are evenly distributed. By comparing the micro- structures in the different layers. Moreover, as analyzed
structures of different positions, it can be confirmed that before, the content of iron in CC alloy is much higher.
the microstructures of CC alloy shows nonuniformity Therefore, more Fe-rich precipitates which appear at the
owing to dramatically centrifugal force, heat transfer early stages of solidification are likely to act as new nuclei.
during solidification, complex fluid dynamics, and free And precipitates can hinder the growth of a phase,
surface flows. eventually leading to a refinement of the microstructure.17
When the melt is poured into the mold, its rotational The microstructures in Fig. 2 are demonstrated at a
speed is far less than the mold and the turbulence occurs higher magnification in the SEM micrographs (Fig. 3),
because of drastic relative motion. Accordingly, arms of where the structures, morphologies, and distribution
the primary dendritic columnar grains detach increasingly of phases can be clearly identified. As shown in
which can provide sites for nucleation of a phase in the Figs. 3(a) and 3(b), CC alloy mainly consists of a phase,
external layer. As rotational speed of the melt increases, several j phases, and b9 phase. Besides, c2 phase has not
laminal flow originally arises from the external layer been found possibly because CC alloy has a higher
and expands to the internal layer gradually. This pro- content of iron so a large amount of aluminum is used
cess promotes the growth of large columnar or dendritic- to form Fe-rich j phases. All phases presented in the alloy
shaped grains. With the development of this process, are identified according to the morphologies, distribution
turbulence and laminal flow appear alternately in the and EDS results (Table I). It can be confirmed that the

FIG. 2. Microstructures of as-cast alloy, (a) CC alloy from external to internal layer, (b) GC alloy.

FIG. 3. SEM micrographs of as-cast alloys, (a and b) CC alloy and (c and d) GC alloy.

Downloaded from http:/www.cambridge.org/core. SUNY Stony Brook, on 14 Dec 2016 atJ.13:22:58,


Mater.subject
Res., to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at http:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
2016 3
http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.455
G. Lin et al.: Effects of heat treatments on microstructure and properties of nickel–aluminum bronze fabricated by centrifugal casting

large dendritic-shaped or spherical particles in a grains are Differences of microstructures are substantially related
jI precipitates. And the smaller, dendritic-shaped particles to dramatically centrifugal force and the heat transfer
dispersed in the periphery of a grains are jII precipitates. during solidification. In regard to CC process, the ingot
Besides, the lamellar or globular eutectoid decomposition solidifies from external to internal layer sequentially
products originating from grain boundaries of a phase and and should not be removed from the mold until its
growing into b phase are referred to as jIII precipitates. temperature is low enough to prevent the distortion.
Owing to the slow cooling rate, most of lamellar jIII Additionally, heat transfer of CC process mainly
phases turn into globular shape. As regards GC alloy consists of heat dissipation through the mold and slight
[Figs. 3(c) and (d)], jI phase is invisible because of less convection between the internal melt and ambient air in
content of iron and morphologies and distribution of other that the internal surface is formed by centrifugal force.
j phases are essentially similar to CC alloy. In terms of On the contrary, GC alloy is formed by core instead of
a phase, GC alloy has the Widmanstätten morphology centrifugal force. On the one hand, the core is capable of
different from small equiaxed grains in CC alloy. More- absorbing a certain amount of heat from the melt. On the
over, c2 phase and b9 phase can be seen in the in- other hand, it should be removed when the solidification
tergranular regions. is finished to avoid the corn being held tightly, which
Figure 4 shows TEM micrographs of as-cast CC alloy. results in the enhancement of heat dissipation area
Obviously, jIII phases distribute not only in the areas of and cooling intensity. Therefore, the cooling rate during
b phase but also in a grains [Fig. 4(a)]. And the small solidification of GC process is higher compared with
precipitates throughout a grains are definitively jIV phase that of CC process, leading to the differences of micro-
which is explicitly exhibited in Fig. 4(b). In addition, structures. What’s more, turbulence and vibration of CC
b9 phase is needle-shaped martensite consisted with the apparatus can promote the detachment of arms on the
previous works.17 primary dendritic columnar crystals, conducing to the
formation of finer equiaxed a grains.15
TABLE I. EDS of different phases observed in CC alloy and GC
alloy (wt%). B. Mechanical properties of as-cast alloys
Phase Alloy Cu Al Fe Ni Si Mechanical properties of two as-cast alloys are listed in
GC 85.12 8.79 3.08 3.01 ... Table II. The ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and hardness
Α(Cu)
CC 84.63 8.78 3.01 3.58 ... of CC alloy are 602 MPa and 136 HBS, respectively,
GC ... ... ... ... ... which are superior to 577 MPa and 130 HBS of GC alloy.
jI(FeAl3)
CC 10.85 10.49 71.50 4.35 2.81 However, the elongation of CC alloy is 17.7%, slightly
GC 12.79 18.71 59.96 4.27 4.27
jII(Al-Fe) lower than 19% (GC alloy). By comparison, CC process
CC 19.74 14.53 52.05 11.8 1.88
GC 52.98 16.90 15.06 15.06 ... can improve UTS and hardness at a cost of elongation.
a 1 jIII(Al–Ni)
CC 57.40 14.97 9.12 18.50 ... The discrepancies of comprehensive mechanical prop-
GC 58.80 22.72 11.61 5.72 1.15 erties have a close relationship with microstructure
c2(Cu9Al4)
CC ... ... ... ... ... morphologies of as-cast alloy. As mentioned before,
GC 72.38 13.53 6.38 7.72 ...
b9(Cu3Al)
CC 69.08 15.25 5.88 9.79 ...
soft a phase in CC alloy is finer.18 And c2 phase presented
in GC alloy has a deleterious effect on mechanical

FIG. 4. TEM micrographs of as-cast CC alloy, (a) jIV phase, (b) jIII phase in a grains, and (c) the morphology of b9 phase.

Downloaded
4 from http:/www.cambridge.org/core. SUNY Stony Brook, on 14 Dec 2016 at 13:22:58,
J. Mater. subject
Res., 2016 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at http:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.455
G. Lin et al.: Effects of heat treatments on microstructure and properties of nickel–aluminum bronze fabricated by centrifugal casting

properties. All these factors combined with devoid of while the other phases are seldom changed. As the
jI phases lead to significant reduction of mechanical temperature continues to rise, a phase gradually dissolves
properties for GC alloy. into b phase corresponding to the downswing of volume
Obviously, it is noted that the microhardness of fraction of a phase as plotted in Fig. 5. And at the same
a phase in GC alloy is 208 HV while it is reduced to time, the increasing hard b9 phase leads to significant
193 HV in CC alloy. It is mainly due to the solution elevation of the hardness. At 890 °C, it is noted that
strengthening. According to EDS results in Table I, overwhelming majority of various j phases have been
solution of a substantial fraction of iron and nickel is eliminated, counteracting the elevation of the hardness
observed in a phase during the rapid cooling. However, caused by the increasing hard b9 phase (218 HBS).
the microhardness of other phases in GC alloy are much In addition, when the temperature exceeds 890 °C, the
lower, especially b9 phase. This may result from different morphology of b phase seems to be apparent and the grain
quantities and morphologies of precipitates in b9 phase boundaries can be seen definitely in the alloy quenched
influenced by casting conditions. at 950 °C.
With the increase of temperature, the volume fraction
C. Effects of quenching temperatures on of b9 phase manifests a tendency to increase progressively,
microstructure and properties resulting in significant improvement of the hardness.
Hardness and volume fraction of a phase in CC However, excessive content of b9 phase has a deleterious
effect on toughness because b9 phase is needle-shaped
samples quenched at various temperatures are plotted in
martensite. Furthermore, quenching stress has a close
Fig. 5. Obviously, hardness of CC alloy shows a tendency
to increase significantly below 890 °C while disparity of relationship with quenching temperature and exorbitant
hardness becomes inconspicuous when temperature quenching temperature will promote the occurrence of
exceeds 890 °C. This phenomenon can be explained by quenching cracks. Consequently, the optimal quenching
the development of microstructure as the quenching temperature of CC alloy is determined as 890 °C. On the
temperature increases. one hand, the hardness cannot meet the demand when
Figure 6 shows microstructure of as-cast CC alloy the temperature is below 890 °C. On the other hand,
quenching stress increases significantly as the tempera-
quenched at various temperatures. In Fig. 6(b), it can
ture exceeds 890 °C.
be seen that vast majority of eutectoid decomposition
products, i.e., a 1 jIII have been absorbed by a matrix
D. Effects of aging temperature on microstructure
TABLE II. Mechanical properties of as-cast alloys fabricated by GC and properties
and CC process, respectively.
Figure 7 illustrates the hardness and volume fraction
Microhardness (HV) of a phase in CC alloy at various aging temperatures
Casting rb/rs Elongation Macrohardness based on the optimal quenching temperature. It can be
process (MPa) (%) (HBS) a b9 a 1 jIII jI
seen that the variation of hardness seems to be complicated.
GC 577/436 19 130 208 265 205 ... And the peak hardness is 212 HBS appearing at 450 °C,
CC 602/442 17.7 136 193 347 230 320 which is slightly lower than those of the as-quenched
alloy. This is mainly because the volume fraction of soft
a phase increases after aging process. According to
Figs. 5 and 7, the volume fraction of a phase is 42%
for as-quenched alloy (890 °C) whiles the aging alloy
increases to 52%. Nevertheless, the quenching stress
can be substantially eliminated during aging treatment,
ameliorating the fatigue, and corrosion resistance.
Microstructures of the age treated CC alloy are
exhibited in Fig. 8. As analyzed before, microstructure
of as-quenched CC alloy mainly consisted of a phase,
acicular martensitic b9 phase and a few j phases.
For the alloy aged at 450 °C, morphology of martensitic
b9 phase turns into lath-shaped which is further exhibited
in the TEM micrograph perspicuously [Fig. 9(a)]. As the
temperature increases, eutectoid transformation of mar-
tensite initiates and its morphology becomes increasingly
FIG. 5. Hardness and volume fraction of a phase at various quenching obscure. In addition, decomposition of b9 phase contrib-
temperatures in CC alloy. utes to the dramatic decrease of the hardness. At 530 °C,

Downloaded from http:/www.cambridge.org/core. SUNY Stony Brook, on 14 Dec 2016 atJ.13:22:58,


Mater.subject
Res., to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at http:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
2016 5
http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.455
G. Lin et al.: Effects of heat treatments on microstructure and properties of nickel–aluminum bronze fabricated by centrifugal casting

FIG. 6. Microstructure of as-cast CC alloy quenched at various temperatures, (a) as-cast alloy, (b) 830 °C, (c) 860 °C, (d) 890 °C, (e) 920 °C, and
(f) 950 °C.

in Fig. 9(b). When the temperature reaches 610 °C, the


eutectoid transformation has been accomplished and the
martensite is almost eliminated. What’s more, minor
coarsen a phase appears in Fig. 8(e) combined with
a phase in the increasing eutectional composition pro-
ducts, arising the anomaly increase of volume fraction
of a phase (Fig. 7). Therefore, the optimal aging tem-
perature is 450 °C according to the development of
microstructure and hardness.

E. Mechanical properties of CC alloys


Comparisons of mechanical properties and wear
resistance between as-cast CC alloy and heat-treated
FIG. 7. Hardness and volume fraction of a phase at various aging CC alloy are listed in Table III. After optimal heat
temperature in CC alloy. treatment (890 °C/1 h 1 450 °C/1 h), the UTS and
hardness of CC alloy are 663 MPa and 212 HBS,
numerous j phases precipitate predominantly in a grains, respectively, which is superior to as-cast alloy (602 MPa
deterring the downswing of the hardness. Obviously, most and 136 HBS). Compared to as-cast CC alloy, the friction
of martensite has been decomposed at 570 °C and the coefficient of heat-treated CC alloy greatly reduces to 0.38.
laminar eutectional composition products are presented It is obvious that this heat treatment can improve the UTS

Downloaded
6 from http:/www.cambridge.org/core. SUNY Stony Brook, on 14 Dec 2016 at 13:22:58,
J. Mater. subject
Res., 2016 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at http:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.455
G. Lin et al.: Effects of heat treatments on microstructure and properties of nickel–aluminum bronze fabricated by centrifugal casting

FIG. 8. Microstructure of CC alloy aged at various temperatures, (a) 450 °C, (b) 490 °C, (c) 530 °C, (d) 570 °C, and (e) 610 °C.

FIG. 9. TEM micrographs of aging treated CC alloy, (a) the morphology of lath martensite and (b) laminar eutectoid decomposition products.

and hardness as well as wear resistance significantly at Similarly, the deformation resistance is also enhanced
a cost of elongation. so plastic deformation reduces relatively during wear
By means of heat treatment, microstructure morpholo- tests. Consequently, the elevated mechanical properties
gies, distribution as well as volume fraction of soft and hard and deformation resistance can mitigate not only abrasive
phases are improved, increasing the hardness and UTS. wear by preventing the wear debris being pushed into

Downloaded from http:/www.cambridge.org/core. SUNY Stony Brook, on 14 Dec 2016 atJ.13:22:58,


Mater.subject
Res., to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at http:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
2016 7
http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.455
G. Lin et al.: Effects of heat treatments on microstructure and properties of nickel–aluminum bronze fabricated by centrifugal casting

TABLE III. Mechanical properties and wear resistance of as-cast CC alloy and heat-treated CC alloy.

Alloys Hardness (HBS) rb/rs (MPa) Elongation (%) Friction coefficient Wear rate [10 9/(N m)]

as-cast 136 602/442 17.7 0.46 5.1


890 °C/1 h 1 450 °C/1 h 212 663/538 8.4 0.38 3.6

FIG. 10. SEM micrographs of the worn surface, (a) as-cast CC alloy and (b) heat-treated CC alloy.

the matrix but also adhesive wear of friction pairs, which centrifugal force. Consequently, the hardness of CC
contributes to the reduction of friction coefficient. Fur- alloy also appears an inhomogeneity and decreases from
thermore, the initiation and propagation of cracks are external to internal layer.
inhibited to some extent, meliorating the wear resistance (3) By comparison, comprehensive mechanical prop-
of the alloy. erties of CC alloy are superior to those of GC alloy.
The SEM micrographs of the worn surface are pre- (4) According to the development of microstructure
sented in Fig. 10. As regards as-cast alloy, large pits and and mechanical properties, it can be conformed that the
shallow furrows can be seen on the worn surface while optimal heat treatment process is aging at 450 °C for 1 h
the wear debris is not obvious [Fig. 10(a)]. The large pits by air cooling after solution treated at 890 °C for 1 h by
mainly result from serious adhesive wear. According to water quench for CC alloy. Under this condition, the UTS
the morphologies of the worn surface, the wear mecha- increases by about 10% and hardness by about 56% than
nisms of as-cast alloy consist of adhesive wear and slight as-cast CC alloy, while the elongation decreases by 53%.
abrasive wear as well as fatigue wear. Compared with Besides, wear resistance is also improved significantly.
as-cast alloy, significant furrows and wear debris appears
in heat-treated CC alloy instead of large pits as shown in
REFERENCES
Fig. 10(b). Therefore, the wear mechanisms of heat-treated
alloy include abrasive wear, fatigue wear, and slight 1. M.S. Rizi and A.H. Kokabi: Microstructure evolution and
adhesive wear. microhardness of friction stir welded cast aluminum bronze.
J. Mater. Process Technol. 214(8), 1524–1529 (2014).
2. B. Sabbaghzadeh, R. Parvizi, A. Davoodi, and M.H. Moayed:
Corrosion evaluation of multi-pass welded nickel–aluminum
IV. CONCLUSIONS bronze alloy in 3.5% sodium chloride solution: A restorative
In this work, microstructure and mechanical properties application of gas tungsten arc welding process. Mater. Des.
of Cu–10Al–4Fe–4Ni prepared by CC and GC process 58, 346–356 (2014).
3. E. van der Heide, E.D. Stam, H. Giraud, G. Lovato, N. Akdut,
were investigated. The development of microstructure F. Clarysse, P. Caenen, and I. Heikillä: Wear of aluminium bronze
and properties of CC alloy heat-treated at various temper- in sliding contact with lubricated stainless steel sheet material.
atures were also evaluated. The conclusions can be Wear 261(1), 68–73 (2006).
summarized as follows. 4. J.A. Wharton, R.C. Barik, G. Kear, R.J.K. Wood, K.R. Stokes,
(1) Microstructure of CC alloy mainly consists of a, jI, and F.C. Walsh: The corrosion of nickel–aluminium bronze in
seawater. Corros. Sci. 47(12), 3336–3367 (2005).
jII, jIII, jIV, and b9 phase, while GC alloy comprises a, 5. S. Alam, R.I. Marshall, and S. Sasaki: Metallurgical and
jII, jIII, jIV, c2, and b9 phase. Morphologies of a phase tribological investigations of aluminium bronze bushes made by
in two alloys are quite different. GC alloy has the a novel centrifugal casting technique. Tribol. Int. 29(6), 487–492
Widmanstätten morphology while CC alloy tends to (1996).
be finer equiaxed grains. 6. N. Suresh and U. Ramamurty: Aging response and its effect on the
functional properties of Cu–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. J. Alloys
(2) Microstructure of CC alloy reveals nonuniformity Compd. 449(1–2), 113–118 (2008).
from external to internal layer. And Fe-rich precipitates 7. J. Anantapong, V. Uthaisangsuk, S. Suranuntchai, and
are prone to aggregate in the external layer caused by A. Manonukul: Effect of hot working on microstructure evolution

Downloaded
8 from http:/www.cambridge.org/core. SUNY Stony Brook, on 14 Dec 2016 at 13:22:58,
J. Mater. subject
Res., 2016 to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at http:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.455
G. Lin et al.: Effects of heat treatments on microstructure and properties of nickel–aluminum bronze fabricated by centrifugal casting

of as-cast nickel aluminum bronze alloy. Mater. Des. 60, 233–243 as-cast nickel–aluminum bronze. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 13(8),
(2014). 1337–1345 (1982).
8. M. Kaplan and A.K. Yildiz: The effects of production methods on 14. H. Kubo, H. Otsuka, S. Farjami, and T. Maruyama: Characteristics
the microstructures and mechanical properties of an aluminum of Fe–Mn–Si–Cr shape memory alloys in centrifugal casting.
bronze. Mater. Lett. 57(28), 4402–4411 (2003). Scr. Mater. 55(11), 1059–1062 (2006).
9. Y-S. Lee and S-K. Hyun: Centrifugal casting for unpressurized 15. Y.W. Sui, B.S. Li, A.H. Liu, J.J. Guo, and H.Z. Fu:
fabrication of lotus-type porous copper. Mater. Lett. 78, 92–94 (2012). Evolution of solidification microstructure of centrifugal cast
10. R.A. Mesquita, D.R. Leiva, A.R. Yavari, and W.J. Botta Filho: Ti–6Al–4V alloy. Mater. Sci. Technol. 25(12), 1458–1461
Microstructures and mechanical properties of bulk AlFeNd(Cu,Si) (2013).
alloys obtained through centrifugal force casting. Mater. Sci. Eng., 16. Y.S. Sun, G.W. Lorimer, and N. Ridley: Microstructure and its
A 452–453, 161–169 (2007). development in Cu–Al–Ni alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 21(2),
11. M. Yaşar and Y. Altunpak: The effect of aging heat treatment on 575–588 (1990).
the sliding wear behaviour of Cu–Al–Fe alloys. Mater. Des. 30(3), 17. F. Hasan, J. Iqbal, and N. Ridley: Microstructure of as-cast
878–884 (2009). aluminium bronze containing iron. Mater. Sci. Technol. 1(4),
12. G. Chirita, D. Soares, and F.S. Silva: Advantages of the centrifugal 312–315 (2013).
casting technique for the production of structural components with 18. W.S. Ping, L.D. Rong, G.J. Jie, L.C. Yun, S.Y. Qing, and
Al–Si alloys. Mater. Des. 29(1), 20–27 (2008). F.H. Zhi: Numerical simulation of microstructure evolution of
13. F. Hasan, A. Jahanafrooz, G.W. Lorimer, and N. Ridley: Ti–6Al–4V alloy in vertical centrifugal casting. Mater. Sci. Eng., A
The morphology, crystallography, and chemistry of phases in 426(1–2), 240–249 (2006).

Downloaded from http:/www.cambridge.org/core. SUNY Stony Brook, on 14 Dec 2016 atJ.13:22:58,


Mater.subject
Res., to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at http:/www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
2016 9
http://dx.doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.455

You might also like