Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As Seen In
WasteAdvantage
Environmental Strategies
esperanza dash
The City of Charlotte, NC Solid Waste Services Department: Serving Their Community Through Green Eyes
The CiTy of CharloTTe, NC meTro area has CoNsisTeNTly raNked iN The Top 10 for cities with the worst air quality. As the city sought to decrease their carbon footprint, they looked to Solid Waste Services (SWS) for answers. Air quality is a shared resource, and all sectors of society bear a responsibility for improving air quality and protecting our natural resources. Broad availability and the use of cleaner fuel vehicles are essential components to reducing mobile source emissions to provide a better air quality. Many reports and studies have shown that to ensure clean and reliable air along with affordable energy supply, new strategies must be developed to address issues with the amount of pollutants emitted in the air and its negative impact on public health and the environment. Nationally, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from fossil fuel combustion represented the largest source of total emissions from all emission sources in 2008 (EPA 2010). It represents the largest share of U.S. total greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) within North Carolina. Moreover, medium and heavy-duty trucks account for approximately 6 percent of total anthropogenic GHG in the U. S.
As the City of Charlotte looked to become leaders in safeguarding the environment, it consistently sought ways to reduce costs, stay competitive and promote sustainable programs. SWS believed that in order to accomplish this there was a need to re-evaluate the way business was conducted and create a better, more efficient business operating model. As an outcome, SWS created a potentially more efficient organizational structure for the department which included changing the old processes and implementing new methods used to provide service to Charlotte residents.
Reducing carbon footprint through fleet operations has become a growing trend, with nearly half of private and public sector fleets measuring emissions, up from 28 percent in 2008, according to the results of a recent industry survey. For several corporate fleets who have cut down on GHG emissions, their strategies range from idling reduction to improving driver behavior to maximize fuel efficiency. The most important environmental decision a fleet manager makes is the number and type of vehicles to have in the fleet. Minor changes in vehicle operation and selection can result in significant environmental, financial and operational benefits over time. Through the reorganization of the department and its operational changes, SWS was able to take 22 collection vehicles out of service. This potentially reduced emissions by 3,560 metric tons of CO2 per month, making it equivalent to 42,720 metric tons of CO2 reduced annually. By looking for sustainable opportunities, SWS began conducting a pilot study a year ago to determine if compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles were a viable option for the department. The trucks were purchased with the assistance of an NCDENR Mobile Source Emissions Grant approved for appropriation by Council in 2009. The CNG vehicle reduced 15 pounds of criteria pollutants and GHG emissions per vehicle per day. This resulted in a reduction of 7,200 pounds of criteria pollutants and GHG over a year for the two pilot CNG trucks. It also had an overall savings of $2.34 per gallon of fuel consumed and an overall savings of $34 a day per CNG vehicle, which equals approximately $8,840 a year. In addition, SWS had a fuel savings of $32,000 along with a maintenance Victoria Garland-Johnson, Solid Waste Services Key Business Executive (center), commends city crews for providing excepsavings of $39,000 for CNG trucks, which resulted in a tional service to the citizens they serve. Photos courtesy of Astrid Johnson, SWS Collections Administration. total savings of $71,000.
WasteAdvantage Magazine December 2011
91
Broad changes in organizational design and service strategy provided substantial decrease in GHG emissions and substantial fuel consumption savings in gallons, says Garland-Johnson.
As a fuel savings and GHG reduction initiative, SWS also provided safety outreach training to employees to introduce a reduced idling and fuel consumption best practice. SWS focused on education and outreach to achieve compliance with the idle reduction and loitering rule. Under this strategy, sanitation equipment operators will not idle their vehicles for extended periods of time. Drivers are instructed to simply turn off engines. The practice makes for allowances for cases when idling may be necessary. By doing this, it reduces fuel consumption costs and decreases emissions of carbon dioxide. SWS specifically targets reducing vehicle emissions across the department by taking advantage of low emission fuel technologies. In combination with more stringent user practices of anti-idling, proper vehicle maintenance, and operation and vehicle sharing, this has resulted in lower fuel consumption and vehicle emissions. In FY10, SWS consumed 675,319.91 gallons of diesel fuel. However, in FY11 after restructuring and reorganizing the department, SWS consumed 647,342.37 gallons of fuel with 27,977.55 less fuel.
Electricity for onsite use or sale to the grid can be generated using a variety of different technologies, including internal combustion engines, turbines, microturbines and fuel cells. The vast majority of projects use internal combustion (reciprocating) engines or turbines, with microturbine technology being used at smaller landfills and in niche applications. Technologies such as Stirling and organic Rankine cycle engines and fuel cells are still in development.
(www.epa.gov/lmop)
also noted the overall single-family recycling participation rate is now 50 percent, meaning approximately half of all households are setting recyclables out on their collection day. This is an increase of 19 percent as compared to last years participation rate of 42 percent. Also noted during the first year of single-stream recycling was that garbage tonnage decreased by approximately 7 percent. This diversion of about 10,342 tons of material from the landfill produced landfill disposal savings of approximately $274,000. These changes produced to opportunities that contributed to greening SWS bottom line.