Scribd
Upload
29 views2 pages

Learning Paper - 2

Sir Eugene Espejo's report emphasizes the importance of evaluation models for assessing the effectiveness of programs and services, highlighting ISO standards for consistency and reliability. It discusses the Washington Accord's role in accrediting engineering education and the Bologna Process's aim to enhance higher education compatibility in Europe. Additionally, the QS Stars model is noted for its comprehensive evaluation of university performance across multiple dimensions.

Uploaded by

PETER CALONIA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
29 views2 pages

Learning Paper - 2

Sir Eugene Espejo's report emphasizes the importance of evaluation models for assessing the effectiveness of programs and services, highlighting ISO standards for consistency and reliability. It discusses the Washington Accord's role in accrediting engineering education and the Bologna Process's aim to enhance higher education compatibility in Europe. Additionally, the QS Stars model is noted for its comprehensive evaluation of university performance across multiple dimensions.

Uploaded by

PETER CALONIA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

In the report of Sir Eugene Espejo, he highlighted that Models

of Evaluation are essential frameworks that help organizations


assess the effectiveness, quality, and impact of programs, products, or
services. International
The Organization for
Standardization (ISO) provides a set of
international standards that can enhance evaluation
practices across various domains. ISO Standards: Using
ISO standards, such as ISO 9001 (Quality Management
Systems), organizations can ensure a consistent
approach to evaluation. This promotes reliability in the evaluation process,
allowing for comparable assessments across different periods and projects.
He also noted that ISO provides uniform criteria for evaluation, which helps
in aligning organizational goals with evaluation metrics. This not only
enhances accountability but also improves overall performance.

He also emphasized that the Washington Accord is a significant


international agreement that recognizes engineering education programs
that meet certain standards of quality and learning outcomes. As a model for
evaluation, the Washington Accord can provide valuable insights into
evaluating educational programs, especially in engineering and technology
fields. The Washington Accord establishes a set of standards for
accrediting engineering programs. This emphasizes the importance of
maintaining high standards of quality in education, ensuring that graduates
possess the necessary competencies.

It was also discussed that the Bologna Process is a collaborative


agreement among European countries aimed at creating a more coherent,
compatible, and competitive higher education system across Europe. Central
to the Bologna Process is the focus on student-centered learning, quality
assurance, and the establishment of a European Higher Education Area
(EHEA). By establishing clear frameworks for degrees, the Bologna Process
allows for easier recognition of qualifications across countries, facilitating
student mobility and making it simpler for employers to understand the
credentials of graduates.

The reported also mentioned that the QS Stars model employs a


comprehensive approach to evaluation by considering multiple dimensions of
university performance. This allows institutions to gain a deeper
understanding of their strengths and weaknesses across various integral
areas.

You might also like