0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3K views10 pages

Chapter 4

Chapter 4 presents data collected from 8 street food vendors in Tubod, focusing on their demographics, income, and responses to survey questions. The majority of respondents are female, aged 30-39, with a balanced income distribution and varying educational backgrounds. The chapter includes visual representations of the data and analyzes responses to marketing, pricing, product quality, and customer service strategies.

Uploaded by

katecasas659
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3K views10 pages

Chapter 4

Chapter 4 presents data collected from 8 street food vendors in Tubod, focusing on their demographics, income, and responses to survey questions. The majority of respondents are female, aged 30-39, with a balanced income distribution and varying educational backgrounds. The chapter includes visual representations of the data and analyzes responses to marketing, pricing, product quality, and customer service strategies.

Uploaded by

katecasas659
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 4

Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data

This chapter presented the data gathered from the 8 street food vendors in Tubod

Business Community Center, Lanao del Norte. The researchers carefully selected these vendors

to obtain relevant insights into their operations and challenges. The data were systematically

organized and presented through tables and a pie graph, which provided a clear visual

representation of the findings. This chapter also addressed and clarified the questions outlined in

the statement of the problem, ensuring a comprehensive analysis based on the collected

information.

Data Presentation

Part I. Demographic Profile of Respondents

Sex

The data indicates that out of a total of 8 respondents, 75% (6 individuals) are female,

making them the majority, while the remaining 25% (2 individuals) are male. This suggests that

the respondent group is composed of females, with a smaller representation of males.

Table 1. Sex of the Respondents


Sex Frequency Percentage
Female 6 75%
Male 2 25%
Total 8 100%
Age

Table 2 illustrated the age of the respondents. Out of the 8 respondents, 5 or 62.5% were

aged 30-39, 1 or 12.5% was aged 40-49, and 2 or 25% were aged 50-59. This implied that the

majority of the respondents were within the 30-39 age range.

Table 2. Age of the Respondents


Age Frequency Percentage
30-39 5 62.5%
40-49 1 12.5%
50-59 2 25%
Total 8 100%

Educational Attainment

The respondents' educational attainment reveals that 12.5% (1 individual) are elementary

graduates, 50% (4 individuals) have some college education, and 37.5% (3 individuals) are

college graduates. The majority have reached or completed college, with only a small percentage

having finished elementary education.

Table 3. Educational attainment of the Respondents


Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage
Elementary Graduate 1 12.5%
College Level 4 50%
College Graduate 3 37.5%
Total 8 100%
Monthly Income

The respondents' monthly income is equally distributed: half (50% or 4 individuals) earn

below ₱10,000.00, while the other half (50% or 4 individuals) earn between ₱10,001.00 and

₱20,000.00. This reflects a balanced income distribution among the 8 respondents.

Table 4. Monthly income of the Respondents

Monthly Income Frequency Percentage


Below 10,000.00 4 50%
10,001.00 – 20,000.00 4 50%
Total 8 100%

Part II. Data from the Survey using Likert Scale

The researchers used Likert scale in conducting their survey. The table below represents

the responses of each respondents to each questions.

Table 5. Presentation of the Respondents’ Response

Respondents Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 1 Question 2 Question 3

1 Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Strongly Disagree

Agree Agree Disagree

2 Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly

Disagree Agree Disagree Disagree

3 Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree


Agree

4 Strongly Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Strongly

Agree Disagree

5 Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly

Agree Disagree Disagree Disagree Disagree Disagree

6 Disagree Strongly Strongly Strongly Disagree Disagree

Agree Agree Agree

7 Agree Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly Strongly

Agree Disagree Agree

8 Agree Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Strongly

Agree Agree Agree

Table 5.1 Presentation of the Respondents’ Response

Respondents Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 1 Question 2 Question 3

1 Strongly Strongly Agree Strongly Strongly Agree

Agree Agree Agree Agree

2 Strongly Agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly

Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree

3 Agree Agree Agree Agree Strongly Agree

Agree

4 Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly

Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree

5 Agree Agree Strongly Strongly Agree Agree


Agree Agree

6 Agree Agree Agree Agree Strongly Agree

Agree

7 Agree Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Agree

Disagree Disagree

8 Agree Strongly Strongly Agree Strongly Strongly

Agree Agree Agree Agree

Table 5.2 Presentation of the Respondents’ Response

Respondents Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

1 Agree Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Strongly

Agree Agree Agree

2 Agree Agree Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly

Agree Agree Agree Agree

3 Agree Agree Agree Strongly Agree Agree

Agree

4 Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree

Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree

5 Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Strongly

Agree

6 Strongly Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Disagree

Agree Agree Agree

7 Agree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree Agree


Agree

8 Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly Strongly

Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree Agree

Table 6 showed the total number of responses in each question. The researchers analyzed the

data by making use google sheet to properly count the responses.

Table 6. Total number of responses in each Likert Question

No. of Questions Strongly Disagree Agree Strongly Agree


Disagree
(2) (3) (4)
(1)
Marketing Strategies

1 1 1 3 3

2 2 1 3 2

3 2 3 2 1

Pricing Strategies

1 1 1 2 4

2 4 3 0 1

3 3 2 1 2

Product Quality and


Variety
1 0 0 5 3

2 0 0 5 3

3 0 0 3 5

Customer Service
1 0 0 4 4

2 0 0 1 7

3 0 0 5 3

Table 6.1 Total number of responses in each Likert Question

No. of Questions Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree

1 0 0 6 2

2 0 1 4 3

3 0 0 4 4

4 0 0 3 5

5 0 0 6 2

6 0 1 4 3

Table 6.2 When data were converted to percentage

Respondents Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 1 Question 2 Question 3

Strongly 12.5% 25% 25% 12.5% 50% 37.5%

Disagree
Disagree 12.5% 12.5% 37.5% 12.5% 37.5% 25%

Agree 37.5% 37.5% 25% 25% 0 12.5%

Strongly 37.5% 25% 12.5% 50% 12.5% 25%

Agree

Respondents Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 1 Question 2 Question 3

Strongly 0 0 0 0 0 0

Disagree

Disagree 0 0 0 0 0 0

Agree 62.5% 62.5% 37.5% 50% 12.5% 62.5%

Strongly 37.5% 37.5% 62.5% 50% 87.5% 37.5%

Agree

Respondents Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5 Question 6

Strongly 0 0 0 0 0 0

Disagree

Disagree 0 12.5% 0 0 0 12.5%

Agree 75% 50% 50% 37.5% 75% 50%

Strongly 25% 37.5% 50% 62.5% 25% 37.5%

Agree

Data Interpretation
Sex Age Educational Attainment Monthly Income

12.5%

female
25%
male
13%
25% 30-39 50-39 40-49 Elementary Graduate College Level
38%
75% 62.5% 50% 50%

Below 10,000 10,001 - 20,000


50%
College Graduate

1. Market Strategies

Q1 Q2 Q3

Strongly Disagree 25% 25% Strongly Disagree Strongly Disagree


Disagree Disagree Disagree
13%
Agree Agree 22% 22% Agree
38% Strongly Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Agree
13% 13%

38%
22%
38% 33%

2. Pricing Strategies

Q1 Q2 Q3

Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree


13% Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree
13% 25%
13% 38%
50%
50% Strongly Agree
Strongly Agree
38% Strongly Agree 13%
25%

25%

3. Product Quality and Variety


Q1 Q2 Q3

Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree
38% 38% 38%

63% 63% 63%

Strongly Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Agree

4. Customer Service

Q1 Q2 Q3

13%

Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree 38% Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree

50% 50%
63%

Strongly Agree 88% Strongly Agree Strongly Agree

art II.

Q1 Q2 Q3

13%

Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree 38% Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree
45%
50% 50%
55%

50%
Strongly Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Agree

Q4 Q5 Q6

13%
25%
38% Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree 38% Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree

63%
75% 50%
Strongly Agree Strongly Agree Strongly Agree

You might also like