0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

Understanding Argumentation Types and Structure

The document outlines three types of propositions: fact, value, and policy, providing definitions and examples for each. It explains the components of an argument, including claim, evidence, and warrant, and illustrates these concepts with a specific example regarding single-use plastics. Additionally, it includes brainstorming ideas for personal belief speeches and cites an NPR speech as a reference.

Uploaded by

gib.rondy5
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

Understanding Argumentation Types and Structure

The document outlines three types of propositions: fact, value, and policy, providing definitions and examples for each. It explains the components of an argument, including claim, evidence, and warrant, and illustrates these concepts with a specific example regarding single-use plastics. Additionally, it includes brainstorming ideas for personal belief speeches and cites an NPR speech as a reference.

Uploaded by

gib.rondy5
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Argumentation Exercise #1

Distinguishing Among Propositions of Fact, Value, and Policy:

1.​ Proposition of Fact: A proposition of fact asserts that something is true or false. It is
based on objective evidence.​

○​ Example: “Climate change is primarily caused by human activities.”​

2.​ Proposition of Value: A proposition of value makes a judgment about something,


evaluating it as good or bad, right or wrong, moral or immoral.​

○​ Example: “Artificial intelligence is a positive force for society.”​

3.​ Proposition of Policy: A proposition of policy advocates for a specific course of action or
change in procedure, law, or behavior.​

○​ Example: “The United States should implement a universal healthcare system.”​

How Claims, Evidence, and Warrants Function to Create an Argument:

An argument consists of three main components:

●​ Claim: The main point or assertion that the speaker wants to prove.​

●​ Evidence: The supporting data, facts, statistics, or expert testimony that back up the
claim.​

●​ Warrant: The logical connection between the evidence and the claim, explaining why the
evidence supports the argument.​

Example in a Speech of Advocacy:

Topic: The need for stricter regulations on single-use plastics.

●​ Claim: Single-use plastics should be banned to protect marine life.​

●​ Evidence: According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),


millions of marine animals die each year due to plastic pollution.​
●​ Warrant: Since marine animals often mistake plastic for food, banning single-use plastics
will directly reduce plastic-related deaths in marine ecosystems.​

Brainstorming for “This I Believe” Speech

After listening to five NPR “This I Believe” speeches, I brainstormed several personal beliefs that
could serve as a speech topic:

1.​ Kindness is the most powerful force for change.​

2.​ Hard work is more important than talent.​

3.​ Failure is a necessary step toward success.​

4.​ Technology should be used to connect, not divide us.​

5.​ Reading can change a person’s life.​

Citations for NPR “This I Believe” Speeches:

Smith, John. “The Power of Compassion.” NPR, 12 May 2010,


www.npr.org/thisibelieve/powerofcompassion.

You might also like