Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
1. INTRODUCTION
In order to promote the design of the proposed new construction of the of the of RCC (G+3)
Storied Residential Building of Sri. Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, a subsoil
investigation work was planned by the authorities. With a view to design various foundation
structure under this project a thorough soil investigation was necessary. To complete this work
the service of SHREE RAM CONSULTANCY SERVICES was sought for.
The scope of the work consisted of making one boreholes of 1 50mm dia. and up to a
maximum depth of 18m. The scope of work also included conducting standard penetration
tests, collecting disturbed samples at regular intervals for identification and logging purposes,
collecting undisturbed tube samples at suitable intervals or at change of strata whichever is
earlier and testing these in laboratory.
This would also include the subsoil properties for each stratum so as to come up with the
design parameters for designing foundations, the depth of foundation. As the ground water
table location influences the bearing capacity of a foundation and the method of construction
of a foundation at the site, its location has also to be found.
Based on the above, this report presents the soil profile, laboratory and field test results. On
the basis of these results and their analysis thereof, the most suitable type of foundation is
suggested.
Page | 1
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
2. FIELD INVESTIGATIONS
2.1 GENERAL:
To design the foundation for these proposed structures to be constructed at this site,
Geotechnical Investigation was anticipated. The entire Investigation programme had been
divided mainly into two parts, 1) Field works & 2) Laboratory tests.
Field works unfold the characteristics of sub-surface deposits. The detail fieldwork of
site is presented in a tabular form below:
Water Level
BH Date of Date of
RL (m) Depth of BH Below
No. Commencement Completion
EGL (m)
1 100 18 13 22-04-2024 27-04-2024
2.2. BORING:
Boring was carried out by Shell and Auger method to sink nominal 150mm dia. bore holes to
depths using a mechanical winch. Undisturbed soil samples were collected at suitable intervals
or change of strata whichever is earlier by open drive sampling method (as per IS: 2132-1986,
reaffirmed- 1997).
2.3. SAMPLING:
The sampling equipment consists of a two-tier assembly of sample tubes 450 mm in length
fitted at its lower end, was driven by means of jarring link to its full length or as far down as
was found practicable. The ends of the tubes were sealed with wax and capped before sending
it to laboratory. Nominal 100 mm dia. undisturbed samples and at close intervals in depth
disturbed samples were collected. These were tagged and packed in polythene packets and
transported to the laboratory.
Page | 2
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
2.4. STANDERD PENETRATION TESTS:
In the bore hole at intervals of 1.5m or at change of strata (whichever is earlier) Standard
Penetration Tests were conducted. The split spoon sampler used in SPT is having an outer dia.
of 50.8 and inner dia. of 35mm, is driven with a monkey weighting 63.5kgs falling freely
through 75cms advances the spoon. Number of blows required to penetrate every 7.5cm to a
maximum depth of 45cm was recorded. The first 15cm of drive are considered to be seating
drive and are neglected. The total number of blows required for 7.5cm of penetration is
counted and termed as penetration resistance N". After the completion of the test, split spoon
sampler was opened and soil specimens were preserved in polythene bags for logging
purpose.
2.5 MEASUREMENT OF WATER TABLE:
Ground water level during the boring work and after 24 hours of removal casting was also
noted and shown in the profile.
3. LABORATORY TESTING
The following laboratory tests were performed on soil sample collected from the tentative
bore holes for identification, classification sub soil deposits and to determine their physical
and geotechnical properties
1. Grain Size Analysis.
2. Determination of Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit.
3. Determination of Natural Moisture Content.
4. Determination of Specific Gravity.
5. Determination of Bulk & Dry Unit Weight.
6. Direct Shear Test. (To determine shear strength)
7. One-Dimensional Consolidation Test (To determine settlement potentiality).
Page | 3
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
4. SUBSOIL CONDITIONAND PROPERTIES
4.1. SUB-SOIL CONDITION:
Topographically the bore hole is lying in a plain land of RL 100m. Soil profile were drawn on
the basis of analysis of soil samples obtained from borehole and presented in bore log. The
water table is situated at a shallow depth of 13m from effective ground level. The top portion
of soil strata is having a light yellow-ish brown coloured, moderate stiff and hard silty sandy
soil layer. A deep greyish brown coloured hard and stiff fine granular silty- sandy soil layer
found at a depth from 6m to the bottom most layer of the soil profile. The subsoils are of
moderate quality and characterized by soft clayey silt/ silty sand soil layer of medium
compressibility and plasticity followed by a moderately dense to dense fine silty sand layer.
The characteristics parameters of each individual strata as obtain from laboratory tests are also
presented. The results of SPT “N" values of each possible layer are also shown in the in
profile as well as presented in fig.
4.2. SUB-SOIL PROPERTIES:
The subsoils are of good quality. A light yellowish brown coloured moderate stiff and hard
silty-sandy soil layer of 3m from the top has been observed. Experimenting in laboratory with
the soil collected from the bore hole it has been observed that the soil profile is mostly
consists of a stiff and hard silty sandy soil at the top followed by a light greyish brown
coloured silty sandy soil layer mixed with laterite type soil layer was seen below a depth of
6m to the bottom most end of the existing soil profile. The soil below 6m from EGL is
cohesion less. The soil properties of each layer were determined in laboratory and presented in
here.
Page | 4
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
Details of Bore Hole
4.2.1. STRATUM-1
The depth of this layer is 6m from E.G.L. and the soil layer consists of a moderate stiff to
hard, reddish-brown coloured, silty-sandy soil layer steel grey patches. A dark grey coloured
fine silty sandy soil layer has been observed at the lower portion of the strata. Sand mixture,
kankars and concrete debris has been observed in this layer. The average "N" value of this
layer is 50. UDS is collected from this layer. The soil properties found of this layer so found
are presented below.
GRAIN SIZE
Bulk Density (gms/cc) 2.217 Sand % 48
Dry Density (gms/cc) 1.88 Silt % 43
Natural Water content (%) 58 Clay % 09
Void Ratio 0.41
Specific Gravity 2.64 CONSISTENCY LIMIT
Cohesion (kg/sqcm) 1 Liquid Limit % 38
Friction angle (Direct Shear) 260 Plastic Limit % 27
Page | 5
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
4.2.2. STRATUM-2
The top portion of this layer is having stiff and hard fine granular silty sandy soil layer (C-Φ).
From middle to bottom portion of the soil strata a dense to moderately dense fine silty sandy
soil layer and a silty clayey soil layer with sand mixed profile has been observed. The average
corrected N" value of this layer is 90. The soil properties found of this layer so found are
presented below.
GRAIN SIZE Specifie gravity - 2.65
Sand % 57
Silt % 36
Clay % 07
Page | 6
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
4.3. VARIATION OF “N" WITH DEPTH AND ITS CORRECTION (BH 1):
The field "N" values are presented under Fig. and also given in the bore logs. The corrected
"N" values are given in tabular form and also presented separately in Fig.
Starting Ending Avg. Field Corrected Stratum Computed
Depth (m) Depth (m) Depth (m) N N
Values Values
1.5 2 1.75 15 15 1 26
3 3.45 3.23 59 58 1 27
4.5 4.95 4.73 64 61 1
6 6.45 6.23 61 57 1
7.5 8 7.75 73 68 2
9 9.45 9.23 100+ 96 2
10.5 10.95 10.73 100+ 93 2
12 12.50 12.23 100+ 90 2
13.5 13.95 13.73 100+ 89 2
15 15.45 15.23 100+ 87 2 32
16.5 16.95 16.73 100+ 86 2 30
Stratum Corrected 'N' Values.
No. Average Maximum Minimum
1 48 61 15
2 87 96 68
Page | 7
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
4.4. VARIATION OF “N" WITH DEPTH AND ITS CORRECTION (BH 2):
The field "N" values are presented under Fig. and also given in the bore logs. The corrected
"N" values are given in tabular form and also presented separately in Fig.
Starting Ending Avg. Field Corrected Stratum Computed
Depth (m) Depth (m) Depth (m) N N
Values Values
1.5 2 1.75 23 23 1 25
3 3.45 3.23 53 51 1 26
4.5 4.95 4.73 65 61 1
6 6.45 6.23 70 65 1
7.5 8 7.75 75 69 1
9 9.45 9.23 83 75 2
10.5 10.95 10.73 95 87 2
12 12.45 12.23 100+ 92 2
13.5 13.95 13.73 100+ 90 2
15 15.45 15.23 100+ 89 2
16.5 16.95 16.73 100+ 88 2 31
18 18.45 18.23 100+ 87 2 30
Stratum Corrected 'N' Values.
No. Average Maximum Minimum
1 54 69 23
2 86 92 75
Page | 8
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
5. DISCUSSION AND CALCULATIONS
5.1. GENERAL BEARING CAPACITY CALCULATION:
5.1.1. Strength and deformation parameters:
For stratum - 1
Avg N = 48, estimated cohesion from "N" is 2 kg/sqcm
From, Direct Shear test results, avg C = 0.821 kg/sqcm & estimated Φ = 26°
In future water level may rise and the soil may get softened resulting to low shear
strength values. Considering this aspect, we reduce the C and values using standard practice
[Crevised= 0.67C & Φ = tan-1 (0.67tan Φ)]. Thus we have average Crevised(UC) 0.55kg/sqcm &
average Φrevised = 18.
Thus average C= 1.25kg/sqcm & average Φ= 80
Considering the above and to be in safer side, let us restrict the C to lkg/sqcm and ) Φ=80
The soil modulas Es-4.4N = 211.2
Undrained Young modulas Eu, =KxC= 600 x 1 =600 kg/sqcm
For stratum -2
The corrected average N= 86
And estimated C = 0.3Kg/sqem (From Direct Shear).
For normally consolidated sand, Es = 5(N+15) = 505
For over consolidated sand, Es = 400+10.5N = 1303
Poissions Ratio = 0.3
Frictional Angle = 300
Page | 9
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
5.1.2. Calculation of net safe bearing capacity:
Based on the corrected “N" value and strength properties evaluated from laboratory test, net
safe bearing capacities are calculated for a foundation depth of 1.5m, 2m, 2.5m using the
equation (Hansen 1970) as, recommended by IS (with Factor of Safety - 2.5). The ground
water table is taken as EGL.
Qns = C.Ne Se De + q.Nq.Sq.Dq + 0.5y B Ny. Sy. Dy .Rw
Where,
C=Cohession.
q=Overburden pressure.
Y= Bulk density.
Nc, Nq, Ny are the Bearing Capacity Factors.
B= Breath of foundation.
D= Depth factor.
5.1.3. Calculation of foundation settlement:
The foundation settlement is evaluated using IS:8009 (Part-l)-1976. Which states that,
Total settlement = Immediate Settlement + Consolidation Settlement. St= Si + Sc
The corrected total settlement = (Si + Sc) df x dr,
Immediate settlement, Si= (qB(1-2)I)/E.
Consolidation Settlement, Se = Ht(1+eo) Ce logıo(0+∆)/0.
Where,
Ht=Thickness of the compressible layer.
Cc = Compression Index
eo= initial void ratio.
0-initial overburden pressure
df= Depth Factor, dr = Rigidity Factor.
=0.5 (for clay).
I= Influence Factor (depends upon L/B ration of foundation.
Page | 10
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
Ultimate Capacity in uplift
Ultimate uplift capacity Q qt — Skin friction in sand + Skin friction in clay.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
From the field & laboratory analysis, it has been concluded that, the sub-soil horizons under;
site may be considered suitable for the design & construction of the proposed R.C.C. Bu
Foundation of the proposed structure may be adopted based on analysis & findings appended
Bore log profiles.
After obtaining the laboratory test results of the samples collected from the field and analysis:
parameters in a very careful manner, the net safe bearing capacities of isolated footing
foundation it depths are calculated and shown in table I.
'her bearing value, Bored cast in situ R.C.C. pile foundation with suitable dia & length
i based on theoretical estimation shown in Table No. 2 & 3, piles shall however be load teste
11. Adequate numbers of piles may be accommodated in a group so as to provide uniform an
ae worst condition of seismic forces.
However, the founding depth & type of foundation to be adopted may be decided by the
designer keeping in view various investigated data furnished in this report so as to ensure
structural stability of the proposed construction.
Page | 11
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
Foundation:
Table 1: Safe Bearing Capacities of Footing Foundations
Depth of footing from Footing size Net Safe Bearing
EGL (M') Capacities
(M) (Metric Ton /Sqm.)
( Shear criteria)
3.00 2.0x2.0 6.8
Foundation:
Table2.Safe Load carrying capacity of bored cast in situ uniform dia meter pile
Pile Stem Recommended Safe Load
Dia. (cm) Carrying Capacity (tone)
. L. . (m)
Length of Pile
Pile Cutoff
Length (m)
from G
Compression
40 19.5 13.8
50 15.0 25.34 17.3
60 31.51 20.8
The safe bearing capacities are based on the static analysis and include a safety facto
capacities may be used as a guide line for design. Design capacities should be confirmed on
Pile load test as per IS specification.
The above recommendations have been made on the basis of soil layers encountered
number of tests as reported herein. If any significant departure from the reported data is
actual construction, the Geotechnical consultants may be referred for advice.
Page | 12
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
CONCLUSION ANO RECOMMENDATION
From the field & laboratory analysis, it has been concluded that, the sub-soil horizons below
Conditions at site may be considered suitable for the design & construction of the proposed
R.C.C. Bu Foundation of the proposed structure may be adopted based on analysis & findings
appended Bore log profiles.
After obtaining the laboratory test results of the samples collected from the field and analysis:
parameters in a very careful manner, the net safe bearing capacities of isolated footing
foundation it depths are calculated and shown in table I.
'her bearing value, Bored cast in situ R.C.C. pile foundation with suitable dia & length
i based on theoretical estimation shown in Table No. 2 & 3, piles shall however be load teste
11. Adequate numbers of piles may be accommodated in a group so as to provide uniform an
ae worst condition of seismic forces.
However, the founding depth & type of foundation to be adopted may be decided by the
r keeping in view various investigated data furnished in this report so as to ensure structural
capacity of the proposed construction.
Page | 13
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
Foundation:
Table 1: Safe Bearing Capacities of Footing Foundations
Depth of footing from Footing size Net Safe Bearing
EGL (M') Capacities
(M) (Metric Ton /Sqm.)
( Shear criteria)
3.00 2.0x2.0 6.8
Foundation:
Table2.Safe Load carrying capacity of bored cast in situ uniform dia meter pile
Pile Stem Recommended Safe Load
Dia. (mm) Carrying Capacity (tone)
. L. . (m)
Length of Pile
Pile Cutoff
Length (m)
fromE G
Compression
450 19.5 13.8
500 18.0 25.34 17.3
600 31.51 20.8
The safe bearing capacities are based on the static analysis and include a safety factor
capacities may be used as a guide line for design. Design capacities should be confirmed on
Pile load test as per IS specification.
The above recommendations have been made on the basis of soil layers encountered
number of tests as reported herein. If any significant departure from the reported data is
actual construction, the Geotechnical consultants may be referred for advice.
Page | 14
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
Calculation:
Depth of foundation (M)Df = 3.0
il parameter
C= I).2f› kg/scm= 2.6 I/sqm ysub ( ton/m3) = 1.8
0- 6 , shear condition Local
Bearing capacity factor
1.45
6.22 0.36
shearing resistance for local failure = Ø ø = tan ' 2/3 tanØ
Safe Factor
1.2 Sy= (square ) 0.8
1.3 Sq=
Sy= (circular) 0.6
(square and circular)
Square and
circular)
- 1+ 0.2x B/L = 1.2 Sq — 1+ 0.2x B/L = 1.20 Sy = 1- 0.4x B/L = 0.6
-°ctangle) ( Rectangle) ( Rectangle)
( to be adopted )= 1.3 Sq ( to be adopted )= 1.2 Sy ( to be adopted )= 0.8
pth Factor
dq=dy=1*0.1 ( Df/B) tan(45+Ø/2) for Ø>10
:(1+0.2(Df/B)tan (45+Ø/2)
1.16
1.32
1 for Ø<10
1
dq=dy=( to be adopted)
Page | 15
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
Factor of safety =3
= (2/3x sc dc ic c Nc * sq dq iq y D (Nq - 1) + 0.5sy dy iy y B Ny Rw)
= 1/F (2/3x se dc ic c Nc + sq dq iq y D (Nq — 1) + sy dy iy y B Ny Rw}
20.49
Annex II
Location
Depth = 3.0 m L=B= 2M
Here, H= 4 m
eo= 0.66
Gma= 1.9
Cc 0.13
p 9.425
Let us take allowable bearing capacity 6.8 t/m 2
Ap 4.08 t/m 2
St 24
Depth correction factor = 0.66 For D=B
Therefore
Sfx Correction factor
Corrected
16 <40 mm safe
Therefore, Adopted allowable bearing capacity- 6.8 t/sqm
Page | 16
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
Annex III
Let us consider bored east in situ uniform dia. RCC pile
df = length of pile from existing ground level = 15
L = pile cut-off level = 1.0 metre
D = diameter = 70cm/ 100cm /120cm
Soit data
Average cohesion Ca, 0.78 Kgf/ cm 2
Ca=
Diameter of Pile 40 cm Length 15 m from EGL
1256
Ap (cm2)
Nc
9
0.65
Cp (Kgf/ cm 2 )
Aa (cm 2 ) = Ö/ 4 (D2u- D2 ) 0 cm2
0
C’a:(Kgf/ cm 2 )
0.5
0.78
106760 cm2
Ca (Kgf/ cm 2 )
As ( cm 2) = surface area of the stern
Qp = Ap Nc Cp + Aa Nc C’a
7.35 TON
41.50
Q,——
ri Ca As
Qu= 48.85 ton
19.5 ton
Safe load in compression
Qsc= Safe load in Uplift
13.8 ton 12 m from EGL
Qsu= Diometer of Pile =
50 cm Length=
C'a:(Kgf/ Qp = Ap Ne Cp + Aa Nc C’a
Ap cm 2 )
Nc = 11.48 Ton
Ca (Kgf/ o Ca As
Cp (Kgf/ cm 2 )
cm 2 )
Aa (cm 2 ) = Ö/ 4 (D2u- D2 )
Qu Qp+Of =
Page | 17
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
Safe load in compression ,
Qs =Safe load in uplift Qus =
Page | 18
Name of Work: Proposed new construction of the of RCC (G+3) Storied Residential Building of Sri.
Chandan Dey Roy at Melaghar, Sepahijala Tripura, Pin No- 799115.
Diameter of Pile = 60 cm Length- 12 m from EGL
Ap 2826 cm2
Nc 9
Cp (Kgf/ cm 2 ) 0 65
Aa (cm 2 ) = 3.14/ 4 (D2u- D2 ) 0 CM2
C'a:(Kgf/ cm 2 ) 0
a 0.5
Ca (Kgf/ cm 2 ) 0.78
As(cm 2) =surface area of the stem - 160140 cm2
Qp = Ap Nc Cp + Aa Nc C’a
16.53 Ton
62.25
a Ca As
78.79
Qu Qp+Qf =
31.51 ton
Safe load in compression , Qs =
20.8 ton
Safe load in uplift Qus =
Page | 19
