GROUP 2- FILM CRITICISM
In the context of Sidney Lumet's film "12 Angry Men," Juror #2's character is
often analyzed through a reader-response approach, focusing on how his internal
struggles and interactions with other jurors shape the audience's interpretation of the
film's themes. His initial hesitancy and tendency to agree with the majority, coupled with
his eventual shift towards reason, makes him a focal point for exploring concepts like
conformity, doubt, and the power of individual conviction.
Juror #2 is about a man named Justin who becomes a juror in a murder case.
Later, he starts to think he might be the one who caused the death. It is an interesting
movie that really makes you think how you can handle the consequences of that certain
action even if it's unintentionally. It’s about a jury trying to decide if a young man is guilty
or innocent. Each scene builds more pressure, as his fear of telling the truth grows
stronger than his fear of staying silent. The case becomes more than just deciding guilt or
innocence because it becomes a personal battle with his conscience, this leaves a lasting
impact by showing how one moment can change everything. That’s what happens here,
and it feels powerful. The character of Juror #2 is relatable. He starts off unsure and
scared to speak up, just like many of us might feel in awkward situations and other feels
it's okay when you don't speak up but you feel guilty . This makes him easy to connect
with as we watch him grow throughout the film. Isn’t it inspiring when someone finds
their courage? The movie also highlights the importance of listening to others viewpoints.
Each juror has different backgrounds and opinions, which leads to some intense
discussions.
For instance, The relatable character of Juror #2, initially hesitant and
fearful to voice his opinion, mirrors the anxieties many experience in challenging
situations. His internal conflict the guilt of silence versus the fear of speaking up creates a
strong connection with the audience, making his eventual courageous stand all the more
inspiring. The film also underscores the crucial role of considering diverse viewpoints, as
the jurors' varied backgrounds and opinions fuel intense and thought-provoking
discussions.
As a viewer, I found "Juror #2" directed by Clint Eastwood intriguing because
it tackles the complex issue of a juror's moral dilemma. I appreciated Nicholas Hoult's
performance, which made me feel the weight of his character's struggle. However, I felt
the pacing dragged in parts, and some characters lacked depth, which made it hard to
connect with them. The ending left me confused and wanting more clarity, making me
think that while the film had a strong premise, it didn't fully deliver on its potential.
In conclusion power of individual of Sidney Lumet's film "12 Angry Men,"
Juror #2's leaves the audience with a sense of ambiguity and open-ended justice,
prompting reflection on individual responsibility and the complexities of the legal system.
While the film doesn't explicitly state what happens next, the final scene with Faith at
Justin's door suggests she can't accept their agreement, implying a reckoning with the
truth and a pursuit of justice, regardless of the personal cost. This ambiguity encourages
viewers to consider the nature of truth, justice, and the burden of individual choices.
SUBMITTED TO: FERDINAND L. RODRIGUEZ
