Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
The aim of present study was to evaluate the wound healing activity
of newly prepared polyherbal formulations ( i ,e Ointment, Gel and
Liquid ) in Excision and Incision wound models in rats. The wound-
healing activity was assessed by the rate of wound contraction,
Address for period of epithelialization and skin-breaking strength. In Excision
Correspondence wound model the polyherbal Ointment treated group exhibit
99.78±0.11% reduction in wound area on 20th day when compared to
Research Scholar, Shri standard Betadine Ointment and controls which was 98.55±0.44 %
Jagdishprasad and 90.12±0.27% and faster rate of epithelization (16.55 ± 0.46). In
Jhabarmal Tibrewala the incision wound model, there was a significant increase in tensile
University, Jhunjhunu, strength (538.10± 1.52) was observed in ointment treated group. In
Rajasthan-333001, all cases, there was a progressive decrease in wound area with time,
India. indicating an efficacy of the formulations in healing the induced
wounds. Our present study reveals that the new polyherbal
Tel:+91-9860002258 formulations posses potent wound healing activity, which could be a
E-mail: good choice of remedy for wound healing.
ansarpatel2007@
rediffmail.com Keywords: Incision wound model, Excision wound model,
Polyherbal Formulations, Betadine Ointment.
INTRODUCTION
Wounds may be defined as cut or healing of wounds is essential for the
breaks in continuity of any tissue. Proper restoration of disrupted anatomical
AJPCT[1][6][2013]498-506
Patel et al__________________________________________________ ISSN 2321 – 2748
AJPCT[1][6][2013]498-506
Patel et al__________________________________________________ ISSN 2321 – 2748
AJPCT[1][6][2013]498-506
Patel et al__________________________________________________ ISSN 2321 – 2748
gigantae. Int J P P Sci 2009; Vol. 1(1): 176- extracts of Plantain banana in Rats. Indian
181. J Exp Biol 2009; Vol. 47: 32- 40.
8. Agarwal PK, Sing A, Gurav K, et al.
Evaluation of wound healing activity of
AJPCT[1][6][2013]498-506
Patel et al__________________________________________________ ISSN 2321 – 2748
4 TH DAY
Percentagewoundcontraction
40
20
10
0
I II III
up p p IV p
V VI VI
I II
VI up I
X
ro ou u up u up p p
G Gr ro ro ro o ou rou o
G G G Gr Gr G Gr
Groups
Figure.1. % of wound contraction on 4 th Day.
8 TH DAY
oundcontraction
80
*** *** *** *** ***
***
60
40
Percentagew
20
I II III
p p IV V VI VI
I
VI
II IX
rou
ou up up
oup up p p up
G Gr Gr
o
Gr
o
Gr Gr
o ou ou Gro
Gr Gr
Groups
AJPCT[1][6][2013]498-506
Patel et al__________________________________________________ ISSN 2321 – 2748
12 TH DAY
oundcontraction
100
*** ***
80 *** *** *** ***
60
Percentagew
40
20
I II III
p p IV V VI VI
I
VI
II IX
rou
ou up up
oup up p p up
G Gr Gr
o
Gr
o
Gr Gr
o ou ou Gro
Gr Gr
Groups
16 TH DAY
oundcontraction
100
*** *** *** *** *** ***
80
60
Percentagew
40
20
I II III
p IV V VI VI
I
VI
II IX
rou oup up up oup up p p up
G r ro o r o u u o
G G Gr G Gr Gr
o
Gr
o Gr
Groups
AJPCT[1][6][2013]498-506
Patel et al__________________________________________________ ISSN 2321 – 2748
20 TH DAY
Percentagewoundcontraction 150
50
0
I II III
up p p IV p
V VI VI
I
VIII IX
ro ou u up u up p p up
r o ro ro ro u u ro
G G Gr G G G G
ro ro G
G
Groups
EPITHELIAZATION
25
Epithelializationindays
20
***
*** *** ** *** ***
15
10
I II II
up up up I IV p V VI VI
I
VIII IX
ro o ro up u up p p up
r o o o u o
G G G Gr Gr Gr Gro rou Gr
G
Groups
AJPCT[1][6][2013]498-506
Patel et al__________________________________________________ ISSN 2321 – 2748
200
0
I II III
up p IV p V VI VI
I
VI
II IX
o u up up u up p up
r ro o o u p
G G G
r ro G
r ro ro ro
u ro
G G G G G
Groups
AJPCT[1][6][2013]498-506