Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
1. 2. 3. 4. Dilemmas of Leading and Managing Understanding Your Leadership Style Building Emotional Intelligence Connecting Style and EQ
Aligning people
Leading
Setting Direction Aligning People Motivating and Inspiring
Managing
Planning and Budgeting Organizing and Staffing Controlling and Problem Solving
Source: John Kotter
Situation Startups
Resources
No preexisting rigidity in peoples thinking People are energized by new possibilities Ability to set your own foundation A strong team may be in place People are motivated to succeed Foundation for continued success (pipeline)
Sustaining Success
Need to balance leadership and management
Adapted from: Michael Watkins, Taking Charge in Your New Leadership Role
Situation
Resources
Everyone recognizes that change is necessary, less internal rivalry Small wins can go a long way Can be more directive The organization has significant pockets of strength People want to see themselves as successful
Turnaround
Realignment
More leadership break out of old ways
Convincing employees that change is necessary Restructuring the top team Building a coalition of support for a new vision
Adapted from: Michael Watkins, Taking Charge in Your New Leadership Role
1. Develop an Agenda
3. Leverage Yourself
Your Agenda
What is the agenda for my group? What are our top 3 priorities? What are our key success factors? Are there any changes in the firm or competitive environment on the horizon that might impact our agenda?
Do you see any patterns in how effective your relationships are and characteristics of the other party (level, function, demographics, style)? What can you do (strategy and tactics) to improve your network?
Dependencies Chart
No Commitment Let it Happen Help it Happen Make it Happen
Key Players
1.
2.
3. 4. 5.
Competence
Competent Jerk
Lovable Star
Below Average
Incompetent Jerk
Lovable Fool
Style
Personality
Values
Culture
Experience
Development
Organization
Style
Personality
Values
Culture
Experience
Development
Organization
Choosing a Style
No one style is best. Not all styles are equally effective.
fit Situation
Alignment of Style
Alignment and Fit Misfit
Situation
Self
Self
Style
Style Situation
Misfit: ~ Searching for new goals ~ Requires new identity ~ Inauthentic this is not me
Directive
Participative
Coaching
Pacesetting
Coaching
Cautions
Regular use can undermine morale Could stifle bottom-up creativity if seen as overbearing
Affiliative
Should not be used alone; lacks a performance focus Could lead to analysis-paralysis; endless meetings and no decisions Could crush flexibility and lead to micromanagement Not effective if leader has little to offer in the way of advice or if employees are not open
When a leader is not the expert and/or when team buy-in is needed When team is self-motivated, competent, and task-focused When employees are open to feedback and advice
1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3 3 3
4 4 4 4 4 4
5 5 5 5 5 5
Collective
Confrontation
Performance
Low
Burnout Context
Low
High
Performance Management
What is EQ?
The capacity for recognizing our own feelings and those of others, for motivating ourselves, for managing emotions well in ourselves and in our relationships.
Daniel Goleman
IQ
Competence
EQ
Connection
Management Skills
Self Awareness
Social Awareness
ACTIONS
motivating a colleague
inspiring a team
performance
Self Awareness
Social Awareness
ACTIONS
motivating a colleague
inspiring a team
performance
Self Awareness
Social Awareness
ACTIONS
motivating a colleague
inspiring a team
performance
Self-Awareness
SELF AWARENESS
Recognizing my emotions Insight into how my emotions
OTHERS
Self Awareness
Social Awareness
impact others
Know my own strengths and
weaknesses
Self-confident
ACTIONS
Self Management
Relationship Management
AWARENESS
SELF
OTHERS
Self Awareness
Social Awareness
ACTIONS
Self
Management
Relationship Management
C
Control
To what extent do you think you can influence whatever happens next? How likely are you to try to do something to improve the situation, regardless of your role? How far does it reach? How big or bad do you think it will be? How large a shadow does it cast over all your activities? How long do you think it will last or endure?
Stotlz, Adversity Quotient @ Work, 2000
O
Ownership
R
Reach
E
Endurance
C
Control
&
O
Ownership
Mutually reinforcing: The more Control you feel, it is more difficult to deflect accountability. As you take more Ownership, you feel a greater sense of Control over the situation.
R
Reach
&
E
Endurance
Interdependent: If you believe adversity is far-reaching, it is more likely that it will Endure. The longer you believe an adversity will last, there is greater likelihood that it will Reach into more aspects of your life.
Stotlz, Adversity Quotient @ Work, 2000
Self Awareness
Social Awareness
and perspectives and take an active interest in their concerns (Individual Focus)
Organizational Awareness read
ACTIONS
Self Management
Relationship Management
SELF AWARENESS
OTHERS
Self Awareness
Social Awareness
ACTIONS
Self Management
Relationship Management
Inspirational Leadership
Logos logic of the argument Pathos emotional impact of the argument Ethos values represented or expressed by leader
Logos
Ethos
Pathos
Visionary
Empathy, inspirational leadership, adaptability, influence
Affiliative
Empathy, positive outlook
Participative
Teamwork, empathy
Pacesetting
Achievement, organizational awareness
Coaching
Coach and mentor, empathy, self-awareness
Aware of
Our action Our intentions
Unaware of
Impact on others
Their impact on us
Their intentions
High
Imposing Positions
Mutual Learning
Advocacy
Withdrawal
Potential Inaction
Low
Low Inquiry High
Problem Solve:
What you need to understand is? Heres the answer
High Will
Guide
(Structure & Coach)
Delegate Challenge:
Low Will
Direct
Low Skill
Thank You