Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Oprea Laura-Gabriela
Specializarea :Asisitenta Medicala Generala
Anul 2 Grupa 4.
Titlul articolului
Titlul articolului
o Se ncadreaza n cerinele unui articol deoarece este alctuit din
aproximativ 11 cuvinte.
o Cuvintele informative sunt puse la nceputul titlului conform
cerinelor.
o Titlul rezum coninutul articolului.
Autorii
o ncep, de obicei, cu numele i iniiala prenumelui.
o Articolul nu respect aceast regul: Lora A. Killam, June M.
Raymond.
o Primul autor este cel care a realizat esenialul, Lora A. Killam.
Restul autorilor au fost trecui n funcie de participare la lucru i
redactare.
o Se specific adresa de e-mail: laura.killam@cambriancollege.ca
Rezumat
Background
Nursing education necessitates vigilance for clinical safety, a
daunting challenge given the complex interchanges between students,
patients and educators. As active learners, students offer a subjective
understanding concerning safety in the practice milieu that merits further
study. This study describes the viewpoints of senior undergraduate nursing
students about compromised safety in the clinical learning environment.
Methods
Q methodology was used to systematically elicit multiple viewpoints
about unsafe clinical learning from the perspective of senior students
enrolled in a baccalaureate nursing program offered at multiple sites in
Ontario, Canada. Across two program sites, 59 fourth year students sorted
43 theoretical statement cards, descriptive of unsafe clinical practice. Qanalysis identified similarities and differences among participant viewpoints
yielding discrete and consensus perspectives.
Rezumat
Results
A total of six discrete viewpoints and two consensus perspectives
were identified. The discrete viewpoints at one site were Endorsement of
Uncritical Knowledge Transfer, Non-student Centered Program and Overt
Patterns of Unsatisfactory Clinical Performance. In addition, a consensus
perspective, labeled Contravening Practices was identified as responsible for
compromised clinical safety at this site. At the other site, the discrete
viewpoints were Premature and Inappropriate Clinical Progression, Nonpatient Centered Practice and Negating Purposeful Interactions for
Experiential Learning. There was consensus that Eroding Conventions
compromised clinical safety from the perspective of students at this second
site.
Conclusions
Senior nursing students perceive that deficits in knowledge, patientcentered practice, professional morality and authenticity threaten safety in
the clinical learning environment.
Rezumat
o Prezint esena informaiilor articolului i orienteaz cititorul
asupra coninutului
o Cuprinde: introducere, obiectiv, metode i materiale, rezultate i
concluzii
o Rezultatele sunt detaliate cu cifre i date statistice
o Concluzia principal este la trecut
o Corespunde normelor Vancouver(rezumatul limitat la 250 de
cuvinte), respect structura IMRAD(introduction, methods, results,
discussions)
o Scopul nu este formulat dintr-o singur fraz
o Ultima fraz reia concluzia principal a articolului
Cuvinte cheie
o
o
o
o
o
Nursing education
Q methodology
Safety
Clinical learning
Student perspectives
Structura textului
o Introducere
o Material i metod
o Rezultate
o Discuii
o Concluzii
Introducere
o Este alctuit adesea din 3 pri:
1.
2.
3.
Introducere
o Scopul acestui studiu este de a descrie punctul de vedere al
studenilor la AM despre sigurana compromis n mediul de
studiu spitalicesc.
o Cuprinde esena informaiilor i ofer detalii suficiente pentru a
strnii interesul cititorului pentru restul articolului.
o Indic scopul pentru care s-a realizat cercetarea.
o Nu am ntlnit erori
Obiective
o This study is a component of a larger research initiative that
involves all levels of students enrolled in a single baccalaureate
nursing program. The aim of the parent study is to conceptualize
students perspective of safety in clinical learning
o Scopul i obiectivul principal (ce? de ce?)
Acest studiu a fost fcut pentru a vedea care este punctul de vedere al
studenilor cu privire la sigurana compromis n mediul de nvare
clinic.
o Metoda (cum?)
Cei 59 de student au fost mprii n dou grupe A i B ce au avut de ales
ntre 43 de afirmaii ce descriu practice clinice nesigure. Metoda folosit
numit Qmethodology a identificat similariti i diferene ntre prerile
studenilor.
Obiective
o Cele mai importante rezultate (OR, P, CI)
Un total de ase puncte de vedere distincte i dou perspective consens
au fost identificate.
o
Material i metod
o Permite evaluarea rigorii tiinifice
o A fost utilizat metodologia Q pentru a obine puncte de vedere
multiple despre practicile nesigure din perspectiva studenilor anul
IV nscrii ntr-un program de asisten medical oferit n mai multe
locaii din Ontario, Canada.
Material i metod
Rezultate
o Partea cea mai important, care d credibilitate a articolului
o Sunt prezentate sub form de text i tabel
o Au fost identificate un total de 6 puncte de vedere distincte i dou
perspective consens.
o Sunt de tip cantitativ, exprimate n numere
Discuii
Scopul lucrrii, menionat n introducere, a fost ndeplinit
Se repeta unele teme de la seciunea rezultate i apar foarte
multe detalii ale unor studii.
Concluzii
Textul este explicit, se precizeaz consecinele rezultatelor
obinute, eventualele noi strategii i cooperri pe aceast tem,
alte cai de cercetare in viitor.
Punctele cheie descoperite n studiu: Nursing education, QMethodology, Safety, Clinical learning, Student perspectives
Bibliografie
o Richardson A, Storr J. Patient safety: a literature review on the
impact of nursing empowerment, leadership and collaboration.
Int Nurs Rev. 2010;57(1):1221. doi: 10.1111/j.14667657.2009.00757.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
o World Health Organization. Patient safety curriculum guide:
Multi-professional edition. Malta, Greece; 2011.
o Canadian Nurses Association. Position statement: patient safety.
Ottawa, Canada; 2009.
o Groves PS, Meisenbach RJ, Scott-Cawiezell J. Keeping patients
safe in healthcare organizations: a structuration theory of safety
culture. J Adv Nurs. 2011;67(8):18461855. doi: 10.1111/j.13652648.2011.05619.x. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
o .a
Referine bibliografice
o Sunt numerotate cu cifre arabe n ordinea apariiei n text
o n lista de referine, clasificarea se face prin numrul
corespunztor n text, fr criteriul alfabetic
o Crile: autorii, titlu, traductor, editor, ediie, publicare, an,
caracterizare cantitativ(numr de pagini/pagini citate), colecie,
not(titlu original/numr standard ISBN)
o Articole: autori, titlu, +/- responsabilitatea secundar, titlul
documentului, gazd, ediie, an, numr standard ISSN(cod de
referin pentru reviste)