Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nonparametric Statistics
Learning Objectives
1. Distinguish Parametric &
Nonparametric Test Procedures
2. Explain commonly used
Nonparametric Test Procedures
3. Perform Hypothesis Tests Using
Nonparametric Procedures
Parametric
Parametric
Nonparametric
Nonparametric
Wilcoxon
Wilcoxon
Rank
RankSum
Sum
Test
Test
ZZTest
Test
ttTest
Test
One-Way
One-Way
ANOVA
ANOVA
Kruskal-Wallis
Kruskal-Wallis
H-Test
H-Test
2.
3.
Nonparametric Test
Procedures
1.
2.
3.
Advantages of
Nonparametric Tests
1.
2.
Easier to Compute
3.
4.
5.
Disadvantages of
Nonparametric Tests
1. May Waste Information
Parametric model more efficient
if data Permit
2. Difficult to Compute by
hand for Large Samples
3. Tables Not Widely Available
Sign Test
Sign Test
1.
H0:
Ha:
=
Test Statistic:
P-Value:
Decision:
Conclusion:
EPI 809 / Spring 200
H0: = 3
Ha: < 3
=
Test Statistic:
P-Value:
Decision:
Conclusion:
EPI 809 / Spring 200
H0: = 3
Ha: < 3
= .05
Test Statistic:
P-Value:
Decision:
Conclusion:
EPI 809 / Spring 200
P-Value:
Decision:
Conclusion:
Is observing 2 or
more a small prob
event?
EPI 809 / Spring 200
P-Value:
P(S 2) = 1 - P(S 1)
= .9297
(Binomial Table, n = 7,
p = 0.50)
Decision:
Conclusion:
Is observing 2 or
more a small prob
event?
EPI 809 / Spring 200
P-Value:
P(x 2) = 1 - P(x 1)
= . 9297
(Binomial Table, n = 7,
p = 0.50)
Decision:
Do Not Reject at = .05
Conclusion:
Is observing 2 or
more a small prob
event?
EPI 809 / Spring 200
P-Value:
P(x 2) = 1 - P(x 1) =
= . 9297
(Binomial Table, n = 7,
p = 0.50)
Decision:
Do Not Reject at = .05
Conclusion:
There is No evidence for
Median < 3
Is observing 2 or
more a small prob
event?
EPI 809 / Spring 200
H0:
Ha:
=
n1 = n2 =
Critical Value(s):
Test Statistic:
Decision:
Conclusion:
Ranks
EPI
809 / Spring 200
Test Statistic:
Decision:
Conclusion:
Ranks
EPI
809 / Spring 200
Test Statistic:
Decision:
Conclusion:
Ranks
EPI
809 / Spring 200
Test Statistic:
Decision:
Conclusion:
28
Ranks
EPI
809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
Rank Sum
EPI 809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
85
82
94
97
...
...
Rank Sum
EPI 809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
85
82
94
97
...
...
Rank Sum
EPI 809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
85
82
94
97
...
...
Rank Sum
EPI 809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
85
82
4
94
97
...
...
Rank Sum
EPI 809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
85
82
4 3.5
94
97
...
...
Rank Sum
EPI 809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
85
5
82
4 3.5
94
97
...
...
Rank Sum
EPI 809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
85
5
82
4 3.5
94
97
...
...
Rank Sum
EPI 809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
85
5
82
4 3.5
94
97
...
...
Rank Sum
EPI 809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
85
5
82
4 3.5
94
8
97
...
...
Rank Sum
EPI 809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
85
5
82
4 3.5
94
8
97
9
...
...
Rank Sum
EPI 809 / Spring 200
Factory 2
Rate
Rank
85
5
82
4 3.5
94
8
97
9
...
...
19.5
EPI 809 / Spring 200
25.5
Test Statistic:
T2 = 5 + 3.5 + 8+ 9 = 25.5
(Smallest Sample)
Decision:
Conclusion:
28
Ranks
EPI
809 / Spring 200
Test Statistic:
T2 = 5 + 3.5 + 8+ 9 = 25.5
(Smallest Sample)
Decision:
Do Not Reject at = .10
Conclusion:
28
Ranks
EPI
809 / Spring 200
Test Statistic:
T2 = 5 + 3.5 + 8+ 9 = 25.5
(Smallest Sample)
Decision:
Do Not Reject at = .10
Conclusion:
There is No evidence for
unequal distrib
28
Ranks
EPI
809 / Spring 200