The BCCI scam involved a bank that took over a million deposits from customers around the world but used the money as a personal piggy bank for its owners and favored clients, advancing them millions without proper documentation or exceeding lending limits. As losses mounted, the bank hatched a scheme to cover them up by using deposits from some customers to make interest payments on other loans to deceive auditors about its troubled loan portfolio. Uncensored audits and reports revealed it as one of the most complex deceptions in banking history involving offshore funds and favored clients of the bank's owners.
The BCCI scam involved a bank that took over a million deposits from customers around the world but used the money as a personal piggy bank for its owners and favored clients, advancing them millions without proper documentation or exceeding lending limits. As losses mounted, the bank hatched a scheme to cover them up by using deposits from some customers to make interest payments on other loans to deceive auditors about its troubled loan portfolio. Uncensored audits and reports revealed it as one of the most complex deceptions in banking history involving offshore funds and favored clients of the bank's owners.
The BCCI scam involved a bank that took over a million deposits from customers around the world but used the money as a personal piggy bank for its owners and favored clients, advancing them millions without proper documentation or exceeding lending limits. As losses mounted, the bank hatched a scheme to cover them up by using deposits from some customers to make interest payments on other loans to deceive auditors about its troubled loan portfolio. Uncensored audits and reports revealed it as one of the most complex deceptions in banking history involving offshore funds and favored clients of the bank's owners.
depositors around the world and became a personal piggy bank for its Arab and Pakistani owners and its favored customers. For its best customers, millions of dollars were advanced, often without documentation and sometimes in violation of the bank's own lending limits.
Scheme to Cover Losses, as losses mounted, the bank
apparently hatched a scheme to cover them up by making interest payments on loans with deposits from other customers. The idea was to deceive auditors from detecting the red ink in its loan portfolio. The scheme also involved offshore funds parked in lightly regulated several uncensored copies of the bank's independent audits were released on Capitol Hill along with copies of letters between the bank and its accounting firm, Price Waterhouse. There was also a report prepared by the bank's own senior officers last year who completed an internal investigation of the bank. Using codenames like "Sandstorm" for B.C.C.I. and "Fork" for its Cayman Islands affiliate, called the International Credit and Investment Company, Price Waterhouse sketched out in 45 pages what it termed "one of the most complex deceptions in banking history." Mr. Abedi tapped his contacts in Pakistan for the biggest, the Gulf Group, a shipping and trading conglomerate owned by the Gokal family of Karachi. The relationship began in 1972 when the company made substantial deposits in B.C.C.I. In 1976, according to Price Waterhouse documents, the Gulf Group began borrowing heavily from B.C.C.I. for trade financing and shipping loans.