Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning
Learning Objectives
Objectives
Define conflict
Review the traditional, interactionist, and
human relations views of conflict
Contrast functional and dysfunctional
conflict
Outline the conflict process
Chapter 12 2
Learning
Learning Objectives.
Objectives.
Chapter 12 3
What
What is
is Conflict?
Conflict?
What
What is
is conflict.
conflict.
Awareness
Opposition
Insufficiency
Blockage
Incompatibility
5
Conflict
Conflict
Conflict Defined
– Is a process that begins when one party perceives that
another party has negatively affected, or is about to
negatively affect, something that the first party cares
about.
– Or simply disagreement between the two or more
persons on any point.
Transitions
Transitions in
in Conflict
Conflict Thought
Thought
Traditional View of Conflict
The belief that all conflict is harmful and must be
avoided.
Functional Conflict
Conflict that supports the goals
of the group and improves its
performance.
Dysfunctional Conflict
Conflict that hinders
group performance.
Types
Types of
of Conflict
Conflict
Task Conflict
Conflicts over content and
goals of the work.
Process Conflict
Conflict over how work gets done.
Types
Types of
of Conflicts
Conflicts
Relationship Conflict
Conflict based on interpersonal
relationships. These conflicts are almost
dysfunctional.
The
The Conflict
Conflict Process
Process
Stage
Stage I:I: Potential
Potential Opposition
Opposition or
or Incompatibility
Incompatibility
Communication
– Semantic difficulties, misunderstandings, and “noise”
Structure
– Size and specialization of jobs
– Jurisdictional clarity/ambiguity
– Member-goal incompatibility
– Leadership styles (close or participative)
– Reward systems (win-lose)
– Dependence/interdependence of groups
Personal Variables
– Differing individual value systems
– Personality types
Stage
Stage II:
II: Cognition
Cognition and
and Personalization
Personalization
Intentions
Decisions to act in a given way.
Cooperativeness:
Cooperativeness:
•• Attempting
Attemptingto
tosatisfy
satisfythe
theother
otherparty’s
party’s
concerns.
concerns.
Assertiveness:
Assertiveness:
•• Attempting
Attemptingto
tosatisfy
satisfyone’s
one’sown
ownconcerns.
concerns.
Dimensions
Dimensions of
of Conflict-Handling
Conflict-Handling Intentions
Intentions
Competing
A desire to satisfy one’s interests, regardless of the
impact on the other party to the conflict.
Collaborating
A situation in which the parties to a conflict each
desire to satisfy fully the concerns of all parties.
Avoiding
The desire to withdraw from or suppress a conflict.
Stage
Stage III:
III: Intentions
Intentions (cont’d)
(cont’d)
Accommodating
The willingness of one party in a conflict to place the
opponent’s interests above his or her own.
Compromising
A situation in which each party to a conflict is
willing to give up something.
Stage
Stage IV:
IV: Behavior
Behavior
Conflict Management
The use of resolution and stimulation techniques to
achieve the desired level of conflict.
Conflict-Intensity
Conflict-Intensity Continuum
Continuum
Stage
Stage V:
V: Outcomes
Outcomes
Functional Outcomes from Conflict
– Increased group performance
– Improved quality of decisions
– Stimulation of creativity and innovation
– Encouragement of interest and curiosity
– Provision of a medium for problem-solving
– Creation of an environment for self-evaluation and
change
Creating Functional Conflict
– Reward dissent (dispute) and punish conflict avoiders.
Stage
Stage V:
V: Outcomes
Outcomes
Dysfunctional Outcomes from Conflict
– Development of discontent(dissatisfaction)
– Reduced group effectiveness
– Retarded communication
– Reduced group cohesiveness
– Infighting among group members overcomes group
goals
Why
Why Intergroup
Intergroup conflict
conflict occur.
occur.
Interdependence.
Difference in Goal.
Limited Resource.
Reward Structure.
Difference in perception.
Different time horizons.
In accurate perception.
The increased demand of specialists.
Interpersonal factors.
Conflict
Conflict Management
Management Techniques
Techniques
Conflict
ConflictResolution
ResolutionTechniques
Techniques
•• Problem
Problemsolving
solving
•• Superordinate
Superordinategoals
goals
•• Expansion
Expansionof
ofresources
resources
•• Smoothing
Smoothing
•• Authoritative
Authoritativecommand
command
•• Altering
Alteringthe
thehuman
humanvariable
variable
Conflict
Conflict Resolution
Resolution Techniques
Techniques
Problem Solving.
Face to face meeting with conflicting parties for the purpose of
identifying the problem and resolving it through open discussion.
Super ordinate goals.
Creating a shared goal that cannot be attained without the
cooperation of each of the conflicting parties.
Expansion of Resources.
When a conflict is caused by the scarcity of resources,
expansion of resources can create win-win solution.
Conflict
Conflict Resolution
Resolution Techniques
Techniques
Smoothing
Playing down differences while emphasizing common
interests between the conflicting parties.
Authoritative command.
Management uses its formal authority to resolve the
conflicts.
Altering the human variables.
Uses behavioral change techniques as human
relations training and alter attitude and behaviors that
cause conflict.
i o
o n
n
aatti
o ttii
egg o
N
Negotiation
Negotiation
Negotiation
A process in which two or more parties exchange
goods or services and attempt to agree on the
exchange rate for them.
BATNA
The Best Alternative To a
Negotiated Agreement; the
lowest acceptable value
(outcome) to an individual
for a negotiated agreement.
Bargaining
Bargaining Strategies
Strategies
Distributive Bargaining
Negotiation that seeks to divide up a fixed amount
of resources; a win-lose situation.
Integrative Bargaining
Negotiation that seeks one or more settlements that
can create a win-win solution.
The
The
Negotiation
Negotiation
Process
Process
Issues
Issues in
in Negotiation
Negotiation
The Role of Personality Traits in Negotiation
– Traits do not appear to have a significantly direct effect
on the outcomes of either bargaining or negotiating
processes.
Gender Differences in Negotiations
– Women negotiate no differently from men, although
men apparently negotiate slightly better outcomes.
– Men and women with similar power bases use the
same negotiating styles.
– Women’s attitudes toward negotiation and their
success as negotiators are less favorable than men’s.